81 FR 78944 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 218 (November 10, 2016)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 218 (November 10, 2016)
| Page Range | 78944-78947 | |
| FR Document | 2016-26813 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 78944-78947] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-26813] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules [[Page 78944]] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2015-0084; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-181-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening of comment period. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600 and A300 B4-600R series airplanes. This action revises the NPRM by adding additional inspections for cracking, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary, and adding airplanes to the applicability. We are proposing this SNPRM to detect and correct cracking on the frame (FR) 40 forward fittings, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. Since these actions impose an additional burden over those proposed in the NPRM, we are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these proposed changes. DATES: The comment period for the NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2015 (80 FR 7992) is reopened. We must receive comments on this SNPRM by December 27, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 0084; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2125; fax 425-227-1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0084; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-181-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600 and A300 B4- 600R series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2015 (80 FR 7992) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by reports indicating that, on airplanes that received a certain repair following crack findings, cracks can re-initiate. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the FR 40 forward fittings for airplanes previously repaired. Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued Since we issued the NPRM, we have determined that additional inspections for cracking are necessary and that additional airplanes are affected by the identified unsafe condition. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0232R1, dated December 16, 2015 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model A300 series airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes). The MCAI states: Cracks were found on the lower outboard radius of the centre wing frame 40 forward fitting on in-service aeroplanes. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to reduced structural integrity of the aeroplane. To address this unsafe condition, Airbus issued several inspection Service Bulletins (SB) and repair instructions. Consequently, EASA issued AD 2009-0094, which was later superseded by EASA AD 2011-0163 [which [[Page 78945]] corresponds to FAA AD 2012-25-06, Amendment 39-17287 (77 FR 75833, December 26, 2012) (``AD 2012-25-06'')] and [EASA] AD 2014-0199 [which corresponds to the FAA NPRM], to require repetitive inspections and corrective actions on the affected areas. Since those [EASA] ADs were issued, additional in-service findings induced Airbus to do a new fatigue analysis, using a detailed Finite Element Model study, which resulted in defining new inspection methods. Prompted by these results, Airbus issued SB A300-57-0261, SB A300-57-6117 and SB A300-57-9034 to introduce these inspections. These new inspection SBs supersede and render obsolete inspection SB A300-53-0268 and SB A300-57-6052 and the All Operators Transmissions (AOT) A300-53A0391, AOT A300-57A6111, AOT A300-53W002- 14 and AOT A300-57W003-14. For the reasons described above, EASA issued AD 2015-0232, superseding [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile] DGAC France AD 1998-038-010(B) R1 [which corresponds to FAA AD 98- 25-07, Amendment 39-10933 (63 FR 68167, December 10, 1998) (``AD 98- 25-07'')] and [DGAC France] AD 2003-189(B), and EASA AD 2011-0163 and [EASA] AD 2014-0199, to require the new inspections of the affected areas within new thresholds and intervals. This [EASA] AD is revised to clarify the compliance time(s), introducing a Note after paragraph (1), and to alleviate the reporting requirements of paragraph (3). Required actions include repetitive rototest, ultrasonic, high frequency eddy current, special detailed, and liquid penetrant inspections, as applicable, of the center wing FR 40 lower outboard radius for cracking, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. Related investigative actions include rototest, ultrasonic, high frequency eddy current, and liquid penetrant inspections following repairs of cracking. Corrective actions include oversizing fastener holes and installing new fasteners, doing spotfacing, doing crack-stop holes, and repairing cracking. The compliance times vary depending on airplane configuration. The initial compliance times range from 3 months to 56,300 flight cycles or 76,000 flight hours (whichever occurs first) after accomplishing certain actions. Repetitive intervals range from 1,400 flight cycles or 3,000 flight hours (whichever occurs first) to 37,500 flight cycles or 50,600 flight hours (whichever occurs first). You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 0084. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A300-57-6117, dated May 28, 2015; and Service Bulletin A300-57-0261, dated June 11, 2015. The service information describes procedures for repetitive ultrasonic inspections, rototest inspections, high frequency eddy current inspections, special detailed inspections, and liquid penetrant inspections, and related investigative and corrective actions. These documents are distinct since they apply to different airplane models. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this proposed AD. We considered the comment received. Request To Suspend Activities on the NPRM Pending New Service Information United Parcel Service (UPS) requested that we suspend activities on the NPRM pending the issuance of new service information. UPS stated that the new service information will address airplanes that were not identified in the NPRM and will include new inspections. We acknowledge the commenter's request. We have reviewed the new service information (Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6117, dated May 28, 2015; and Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0261, dated June 11, 2015) and have revised this SNPRM accordingly. We have updated paragraph (c) of this proposed AD to include all affected airplanes, and we have revised paragraphs (g) and (h) of this proposed AD to refer to the new service information. FAA's Determination and Requirements of This SNPRM This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these same type designs. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on this SNPRM. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this SNPRM affects 26 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this SNPRM. Estimated Costs ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cost per Cost on U.S. Action Labor cost product operators ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Inspection........... Up to 91 work- Up to $7,735 Up to $201,110 hours x $85 per inspection per inspection per hour = cycle. cycle. $7,735 per inspection cycle. Reporting............ 1 work-hour x $85............ $2,210 $85 per hour = $85. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Paperwork Reduction Act A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control number for the collection of information required by this proposed AD is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with this proposed AD has been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with this proposed AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200. [[Page 78946]] Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2015-0084; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM- 181-AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by December 27, 2016. (b) Affected ADs This AD affects AD 98-25-07, Amendment 39-10933 (63 FR 68167, December 10, 1998) (``AD 98-25-07''); and AD 2012-25-06, Amendment 39-17287 (77 FR 75833, December 26, 2012) (``AD 2012-25-06''). (c) Applicability This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes, certificated in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(5) of this AD, except airplanes on which Airbus Modification 10221 has been embodied in production. (1) Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes. (2) Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622 airplanes. (3) Model A300 B4-605R and B4-622R airplanes. (4) Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes. (5) Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by reports of cracks on the lower outboard radius of the center wing frame (FR) 40 forward fitting. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking on the FR 40 forward fittings, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Repetitive Inspections Except as provided by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, at the applicable times specified in paragraph E.(2), ``Compliance,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0261, dated June 11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6117, dated May 28, 2015; accomplish rototest, ultrasonic, high frequency eddy current, special detailed, and liquid penetrant inspections, as applicable, of the center wing FR 40 lower outboard radius for cracking, and do all applicable related investigative actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0261, dated June 11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6117, dated May 28, 2015; as applicable. Do all applicable related investigative actions before further flight. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the applicable times specified in paragraph E.(2), ``Compliance,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0261, dated June 11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6117, dated May 28, 2015. (h) Corrective Actions If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, any crack is found, before next flight, accomplish the applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0261, dated June 11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6117, dated May 28, 2015; as applicable; except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. (i) Service Information Exception (1) Where the service information specified in paragraph (g) of this AD specifies a compliance time ``from this service bulletin issuance date,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. (2) Where the service information specified in paragraph (h) of this AD specifies to contact Airbus for certain conditions, before further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus' EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). (j) No Terminating Action for This AD Accomplishing a corrective action required by paragraph (h) of this AD, or accomplishing a preventative action specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0260 or A300-57-6116, as applicable, does not terminate the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (k) Terminating Action for Certain Requirements of Other ADs (1) Accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the actions required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of AD 98-25-07. (2) Accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the actions required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of AD 2012-25-06. (l) Reporting Requirements Within 60 days after any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, report any findings, positive or negative, to Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World (https://w3.airbus.com/). (m) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: [[Page 78947]] Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2125; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200. (n) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0232R1, dated December 16, 2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0084. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 31, 2016. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2016-26813 Filed 11-9-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![78944
Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 218
Thursday, November 10, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER M–30, West Building Ground Floor, aspects of this proposed AD. We will
contains notices to the public of the proposed Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey consider all comments received by the
issuance of rules and regulations. The Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. closing date and may amend this
purpose of these notices is to give interested • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of proposed AD based on those comments.
persons an opportunity to participate in the Transportation, Docket Operations, We will post all comments we
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
M–30, West Building Ground Floor, receive, without change, to http://
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey www.regulations.gov, including any
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 personal information you provide. We
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through will also post a report summarizing each
Friday, except Federal holidays. substantive verbal contact we receive
Federal Aviation Administration For service information identified in about this proposed AD.
this SNPRM, contact Airbus SAS,
Discussion
14 CFR Part 39 Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac We issued a notice of proposed
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0084; Directorate rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
Identifier 2014–NM–181–AD]
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email part 39 by adding an AD that would
RIN 2120–AA64 account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; apply to certain Airbus Model A300 B4–
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You 2C, B4–103, and B4–203 airplanes; and
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus may view this referenced service Model A300 B4–600 and A300 B4–600R
Airplanes information at the FAA, Transport series airplanes. The NPRM published
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue in the Federal Register on February 13,
Administration (FAA), DOT. SW., Renton, WA. For information on 2015 (80 FR 7992) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The
ACTION: Supplemental notice of the availability of this material at the NPRM was prompted by reports
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); FAA, call 425–227–1221. indicating that, on airplanes that
reopening of comment period. received a certain repair following crack
Examining the AD Docket findings, cracks can re-initiate. The
SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier You may examine the AD docket on NPRM proposed to require repetitive
proposed airworthiness directive (AD) the Internet at http:// inspections for cracking of the FR 40
for certain Airbus Model A300 B4–2C, www.regulations.gov by searching for forward fittings for airplanes previously
B4–103, and B4–203 airplanes; and and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– repaired.
Model A300 B4–600 and A300 B4–600R 0084; or in person at the Docket
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
series airplanes. This action revises the Management Facility between 9 a.m.
NPRM by adding additional inspections and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, Since we issued the NPRM, we have
for cracking, and related investigative except Federal holidays. The AD docket determined that additional inspections
and corrective actions if necessary, and contains this proposed AD, the for cracking are necessary and that
adding airplanes to the applicability. regulatory evaluation, any comments additional airplanes are affected by the
We are proposing this SNPRM to detect received, and other information. The identified unsafe condition.
and correct cracking on the frame (FR) street address for the Docket Office The European Aviation Safety Agency
40 forward fittings, which could result (telephone: 800–647–5527) is in the (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
in reduced structural integrity of the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be for the Member States of the European
airplane. Since these actions impose an available in the AD docket shortly after Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
additional burden over those proposed receipt. Directive 2015–0232R1, dated December
in the NPRM, we are reopening the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan 16, 2015 (referred to after this as the
comment period to allow the public the Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
chance to comment on these proposed International Branch, ANM–116, Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
changes. Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, an unsafe condition for certain Airbus
DATES: The comment period for the 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA Model A300 series airplanes; and Model
NPRM published in the Federal 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2125; A300 B4–600, B4–600R and F4–600R
Register on February 13, 2015 (80 FR fax 425–227–1149. series airplanes, and Model A300 C4–
7992) is reopened. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
We must receive comments on this called Model A300–600 series
SNPRM by December 27, 2016. Comments Invited airplanes). The MCAI states:
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, We invite you to send any written Cracks were found on the lower outboard
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
using the procedures found in 14 CFR relevant data, views, or arguments about radius of the centre wing frame 40 forward
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following this proposed AD. Send your comments fitting on in-service aeroplanes.
to an address listed under the This condition, if not detected and
methods:
corrected, could lead to reduced structural
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
integrity of the aeroplane.
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the FAA–2015–0084; Directorate Identifier To address this unsafe condition, Airbus
instructions for submitting comments. 2014–NM–181–AD’’ at the beginning of issued several inspection Service Bulletins
• Fax: 202–493–2251. your comments. We specifically invite (SB) and repair instructions. Consequently,
• Mail: U.S. Department of comments on the overall regulatory, EASA issued AD 2009–0094, which was later
Transportation, Docket Operations, economic, environmental, and energy superseded by EASA AD 2011–0163 [which
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:02 Nov 09, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM 10NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_79162/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules 78945
corresponds to FAA AD 2012–25–06, The compliance times vary depending pending the issuance of new service
Amendment 39–17287 (77 FR 75833, on airplane configuration. The initial information. UPS stated that the new
December 26, 2012) (‘‘AD 2012–25–06’’)] and compliance times range from 3 months service information will address
[EASA] AD 2014–0199 [which corresponds
to the FAA NPRM], to require repetitive
to 56,300 flight cycles or 76,000 flight airplanes that were not identified in the
inspections and corrective actions on the hours (whichever occurs first) after NPRM and will include new
affected areas. accomplishing certain actions. inspections.
Since those [EASA] ADs were issued, Repetitive intervals range from 1,400 We acknowledge the commenter’s
additional in-service findings induced Airbus flight cycles or 3,000 flight hours request. We have reviewed the new
to do a new fatigue analysis, using a detailed (whichever occurs first) to 37,500 flight service information (Airbus Service
Finite Element Model study, which resulted cycles or 50,600 flight hours (whichever
in defining new inspection methods. Bulletin A300–57–6117, dated May 28,
occurs first). 2015; and Airbus Service Bulletin
Prompted by these results, Airbus issued SB
A300–57–0261, SB A300–57–6117 and SB You may examine the MCAI in the A300–57–0261, dated June 11, 2015)
A300–57–9034 to introduce these AD docket on the Internet at http:// and have revised this SNPRM
inspections. These new inspection SBs www.regulations.gov by searching for accordingly. We have updated
supersede and render obsolete inspection SB and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– paragraph (c) of this proposed AD to
A300–53–0268 and SB A300–57–6052 and 0084. include all affected airplanes, and we
the All Operators Transmissions (AOT)
A300–53A0391, AOT A300–57A6111, AOT Related Service Information Under 1 have revised paragraphs (g) and (h) of
A300–53W002–14 and AOT A300–57W003– CFR Part 51 this proposed AD to refer to the new
14. service information.
For the reasons described above, EASA Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
issued AD 2015–0232, superseding [Direction A300–57–6117, dated May 28, 2015; FAA’s Determination and Requirements
Générale de l’Aviation Civile] DGAC France and Service Bulletin A300–57–0261, of This SNPRM
AD 1998–038–010(B) R1 [which corresponds dated June 11, 2015. The service This product has been approved by
to FAA AD 98–25–07, Amendment 39–10933 information describes procedures for
(63 FR 68167, December 10, 1998) (‘‘AD 98– the aviation authority of another
repetitive ultrasonic inspections, country, and is approved for operation
25–07’’)] and [DGAC France] AD 2003– rototest inspections, high frequency
189(B), and EASA AD 2011–0163 and in the United States. Pursuant to our
[EASA] AD 2014–0199, to require the new eddy current inspections, special bilateral agreement with the State of
inspections of the affected areas within new detailed inspections, and liquid Design Authority, we have been notified
thresholds and intervals. penetrant inspections, and related of the unsafe condition described in the
This [EASA] AD is revised to clarify the investigative and corrective actions. MCAI and service information
compliance time(s), introducing a Note after These documents are distinct since they
paragraph (1), and to alleviate the reporting referenced above. We are proposing this
apply to different airplane models. This AD because we evaluated all pertinent
requirements of paragraph (3). service information is reasonably information and determined an unsafe
Required actions include repetitive available because the interested parties condition exists and is likely to exist or
rototest, ultrasonic, high frequency eddy have access to it through their normal develop on other products of these same
current, special detailed, and liquid course of business or by the means type designs.
penetrant inspections, as applicable, of identified in the ADDRESSES section.
the center wing FR 40 lower outboard Certain changes described above
radius for cracking, and related Comments expand the scope of the NPRM. As a
investigative and corrective actions if We gave the public the opportunity to result, we have determined that it is
necessary. Related investigative actions participate in developing this proposed necessary to reopen the comment period
include rototest, ultrasonic, high AD. We considered the comment to provide additional opportunity for
frequency eddy current, and liquid received. the public to comment on this SNPRM.
penetrant inspections following repairs Costs of Compliance
Request To Suspend Activities on the
of cracking.
Corrective actions include oversizing NPRM Pending New Service We estimate that this SNPRM affects
fastener holes and installing new Information 26 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
fasteners, doing spotfacing, doing crack- United Parcel Service (UPS) requested estimate the following costs to comply
stop holes, and repairing cracking. that we suspend activities on the NPRM with this SNPRM.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action Labor cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
Inspection ......... Up to 91 work-hours × $85 per hour = $7,735 per Up to $7,735 per inspection cycle Up to $201,110 per inspection
inspection cycle. cycle.
Reporting .......... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ........................... $85 ................................................ $2,210
Paperwork Reduction Act OMB control number. The control reporting associated with this proposed
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
number for the collection of information AD is mandatory. Comments concerning
A federal agency may not conduct or required by this proposed AD is 2120– the accuracy of this burden and
sponsor, and a person is not required to 0056. The paperwork cost associated suggestions for reducing the burden
respond to, nor shall a person be subject with this proposed AD has been should be directed to the FAA at 800
to penalty for failure to comply with a detailed in the Costs of Compliance Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
collection of information subject to the section of this document and includes DC 20591, ATTN: Information
requirements of the Paperwork time for reviewing instructions, as well Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200.
Reduction Act unless that collection of as completing and reviewing the
information displays a current valid collection of information. Therefore, all
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:02 Nov 09, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM 10NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_79162/page/2.svg)
![78946 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Authority for This Rulemaking § 39.13 [Amended] Service Bulletin A300–57–0261, dated June
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
Title 49 of the United States Code 57–6117, dated May 28, 2015.
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue the following new airworthiness
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, directive (AD): (h) Corrective Actions
section 106, describes the authority of Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2015–0084; If, during any inspection required by
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–181–AD. paragraph (g) of this AD, any crack is found,
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more before next flight, accomplish the applicable
(a) Comments Due Date corrective actions, in accordance with the
detail the scope of the Agency’s We must receive comments by December Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
authority. 27, 2016. Service Bulletin A300–57–0261, dated June
We are issuing this rulemaking under 11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, (b) Affected ADs
57–6117, dated May 28, 2015; as applicable;
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: This AD affects AD 98–25–07, Amendment except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this
General requirements.’’ Under that 39–10933 (63 FR 68167, December 10, 1998) AD.
(‘‘AD 98–25–07’’); and AD 2012–25–06,
section, Congress charges the FAA with (i) Service Information Exception
Amendment 39–17287 (77 FR 75833,
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in December 26, 2012) (‘‘AD 2012–25–06’’). (1) Where the service information specified
air commerce by prescribing regulations in paragraph (g) of this AD specifies a
for practices, methods, and procedures (c) Applicability
compliance time ‘‘from this service bulletin
the Administrator finds necessary for This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes, issuance date,’’ this AD requires compliance
safety in air commerce. This regulation certificated in any category, identified in within the specified compliance time after
is within the scope of that authority paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(5) of this AD, the effective date of this AD.
because it addresses an unsafe condition except airplanes on which Airbus (2) Where the service information specified
Modification 10221 has been embodied in in paragraph (h) of this AD specifies to
that is likely to exist or develop on production. contact Airbus for certain conditions, before
products identified in this rulemaking (1) Model A300 B2–1A, B2–1C, B2K–3C, further flight, repair using a method
action. B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–203 approved by the Manager, International
airplanes. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Regulatory Findings
(2) Model A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation
We determined that this proposed AD and B4–622 airplanes. Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus’ EASA
would not have federalism implications (3) Model A300 B4–605R and B4–622R Design Organization Approval (DOA).
under Executive Order 13132. This airplanes.
(4) Model A300 F4–605R and F4–622R (j) No Terminating Action for This AD
proposed AD would not have a
airplanes. Accomplishing a corrective action required
substantial direct effect on the States, on (5) Model A300 C4–605R Variant F by paragraph (h) of this AD, or accomplishing
the relationship between the national airplanes. a preventative action specified in Airbus
Government and the States, or on the Service Bulletin A300–57–0260 or A300–57–
distribution of power and (d) Subject
6116, as applicable, does not terminate the
responsibilities among the various Air Transport Association (ATA) of repetitive inspections required by paragraph
levels of government. America Code 57, Wings. (g) of this AD.
For the reasons discussed above, I (e) Reason (k) Terminating Action for Certain
certify this proposed regulation: This AD was prompted by reports of cracks Requirements of Other ADs
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory on the lower outboard radius of the center (1) Accomplishing the actions required by
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; wing frame (FR) 40 forward fitting. We are paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking actions required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures on the FR 40 forward fittings, which could AD 98–25–07.
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); result in reduced structural integrity of the (2) Accomplishing the actions required by
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in airplane. paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the
actions required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of
Alaska; and (f) Compliance
AD 2012–25–06.
4. Will not have a significant Comply with this AD within the
economic impact, positive or negative, compliance times specified, unless already (l) Reporting Requirements
on a substantial number of small entities done. Within 60 days after any inspection
under the criteria of the Regulatory required by paragraph (g) of this AD, or
(g) Repetitive Inspections within 60 days after the effective date of this
Flexibility Act.
Except as provided by paragraph (i)(1) of AD, whichever occurs later, report any
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 this AD, at the applicable times specified in findings, positive or negative, to Airbus
paragraph E.(2), ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation Service Bulletin A300–57–0261, dated June Application on Airbus World (https://
safety, Incorporation by reference, 11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300– w3.airbus.com/).
Safety. 57–6117, dated May 28, 2015; accomplish
rototest, ultrasonic, high frequency eddy (m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The Proposed Amendment
current, special detailed, and liquid The following provisions also apply to this
Accordingly, under the authority penetrant inspections, as applicable, of the AD:
delegated to me by the Administrator, center wing FR 40 lower outboard radius for (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part cracking, and do all applicable related (AMOCs): The Manager, International
39 as follows: investigative actions, in accordance with the Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Service Bulletin A300–57–0261, dated June approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
11, 2015; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300– using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
DIRECTIVES
57–6117, dated May 28, 2015; as applicable. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
Do all applicable related investigative actions request to your principal inspector or local
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
before further flight. Repeat the inspections Flight Standards District Office, as
continues to read as follows: thereafter at the applicable times specified in appropriate. If sending information directly
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. paragraph E.(2), ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Airbus to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:02 Nov 09, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM 10NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_79162/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules 78947
Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Federal Aviation Administration For information on the availability of
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149. 14 CFR Part 39 4148.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-
AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using [Docket No. FAA–2016–9382; Directorate Examining the AD Docket
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate Identifier 2016–CE–032–AD]
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
You may examine the AD docket on
RIN 2120–AA64 the Internet at http://
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding www.regulations.gov by searching for
Airworthiness Directives; Alexander and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
district office.
Schleicher GmbH & Co. Gliders 9382; or in person at the Docket
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective AGENCY: Federal Aviation Management Facility between 9 a.m.
actions from a manufacturer, the action must Administration (FAA), Department of and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
be accomplished using a method approved Transportation (DOT). except Federal holidays. The AD docket
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– contains this proposed AD, the
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM). regulatory evaluation, any comments
the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If received, and other information. The
approved by the DOA, the approval must
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new street address for the Docket Office
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal airworthiness directive (AD) for (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a Alexander Schleicher GmbH & Co. ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
person is not required to respond to, nor Model ASK 21 gliders. This proposed available in the AD docket shortly after
shall a person be subject to a penalty for AD results from mandatory continuing receipt.
failure to comply with a collection of airworthiness information (MCAI) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
information subject to the requirements of originated by an aviation authority of Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that another country to identify and correct Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
collection of information displays a current an unsafe condition on an aviation Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB product. The MCAI describes the unsafe telephone: (816) 329–4165; fax: (816)
Control Number for this information condition as cable slack in gliders
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
329–4090; email: jim.rutherford@
equipped with a rudder hand control faa.gov.
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
system leading to a short-term blockage
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
including the time for reviewing instructions, of the rudder control system and
completing and reviewing the collection of reduced control. We are issuing this Comments Invited
information. All responses to this collection proposed AD to correct the unsafe We invite you to send any written
of information are mandatory. Comments condition on these products. relevant data, views, or arguments about
concerning the accuracy of this burden and DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD. Send your comments
suggestions for reducing the burden should this proposed AD by December 27, to an address listed under the
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence 2016. ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, ADDRESSES: You may send comments by FAA–2016–9382; Directorate Identifier
AES–200. any of the following methods: 2016–CE–032–AD’’ at the beginning of
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to your comments. We specifically invite
(n) Related Information comments on the overall regulatory,
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing instructions for submitting comments. economic, environmental, and energy
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA • Fax: (202) 493–2251. aspects of this proposed AD. We will
Airworthiness Directive 2015–0232R1, dated • Mail: U.S. Department of consider all comments received by the
December 16, 2015, for related information. Transportation, Docket Operations, M– closing date and may amend this
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room proposed AD because of those
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., comments.
FAA–2015–0084. Washington, DC 20590. We will post all comments we
(2) For service information identified in • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of receive, without change, to http://
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Transportation, Docket Operations, M– regulations.gov, including any personal
Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room information you provide. We will also
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., post a report summarizing each
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. substantive verbal contact we receive
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, about this proposed AD.
airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com. except Federal holidays.
You may view this service information at the Discussion
For service information identified in
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 this proposed AD, contact Alexander The European Aviation Safety Agency
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
Schleicher GmbH & Co.,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
information on the availability of this
Segelflugzeugbau, Germany, Alexander for the Member States of the European
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Schleicher Str. 1, D–36163 Community, has issued EASA AD No.:
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October Poppenhausen (Wasserkuppe), 2016–0192, dated September 28, 2016
31, 2016. telephone: +49 6658 89–0; fax: +49 6658 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
Michael Kaszycki, 89–40; email: info@alexander- correct an unsafe condition for the
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane schleicher.de; Internet: http:// specified products. The MCAI states:
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. www.alexander-schleicher.de/en/ A temporary rudder control blockage was
[FR Doc. 2016–26813 Filed 11–9–16; 8:45 am] flugzeuge/ask-21/. You may review this reported, involving an ASK 21 sailplane
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P referenced service information at the equipped with a rudder hand control system.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:02 Nov 09, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM 10NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_79162/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-11-10 01:44:12
Document Modified: 2016-11-10 01:44:12
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening of comment period. | |
| Dates | The comment period for the NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2015 (80 FR 7992) is reopened. | |
| Contact | Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2125; fax 425-227-1149. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 78944 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR