81 FR 79068 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 9400 To Include a Cross-Reference

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 218 (November 10, 2016)

Page Range		79068-79069
FR Document		2016-27150
Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79068-79069]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79240; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2016-146]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Rule 9400 To Include a Cross-Reference

November 4, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'')\1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given 
that, on October 25, 2016, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. 
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 9400, entitled ``Expedited 
Client Suspension Proceeding'' to include a cross-reference for 
clarification.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of 
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is filing this proposal to amend Rule 9400, entitled 
``Expedited Client Suspension Proceeding'' to include a cross-reference 
Chapter III, Section 16, entitled ``Disruptive Quoting and Trading 
Activity Prohibited'' within Rule 9400. The Exchange filed a rule 
change to adopt an options rule, identical to equities Rule 2170, which 
relates to disruptive quoting and trading activity.\3\ In that rule 
change, it stated that ``[t]he Exchange will initiate disciplinary 
action for violations of Chapter III, Section 16, pursuant to Rule 
9400.'' \4\ At that time, the Exchange inadvertently did not include 
the cross-references to Chapter III, Section 16 within Rule 9400. The 
Exchange proposes to add references to Chapter III, Section 16 within 
Rule 9400 for clarity. This rule change is non-controversial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities and Exchange Release No. 78208 (June 30, 
2016), 81 FR 44366 (July 7, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-092).
    \4\ See Securities and Exchange Release No. 78208 (June 30, 
2016), 81 FR 44366, 44370 (July 7, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-092). Rule 
9400 is located within the Code of Procedure rules which apply to 
both equities and options violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    The Exchange filed a rule change to adopt an options rule to 
clearly prohibit disruptive quoting and trading activity on the 
Exchange and to permit the Exchange to take prompt action to suspend 
members or their clients that violate such rule pursuant to Rule 
9400.\5\ The Exchange had previously adopted Rule 9400 to set forth 
procedures for issuing suspension orders, immediately prohibiting a 
member from conducting continued disruptive quoting and trading 
activity on the Exchange.\6\ Rule 9400 provides the Exchange the 
authority to order a member to cease and desist from providing access 
to the Exchange to a client of the member that is conducting disruptive 
quoting and trading activity in violation of Rule 2170. The Exchange 
also previously adopted Rule 2400 to specifically define and prohibit 
disruptive equities quoting and trading activity on the Exchange.\7\ 
Chapter III, Section 16 is identical to Rule 2400, however applicable 
to options. Similarly, Chapter III, Section 16 prohibits members from 
engaging in or facilitating disruptive options quoting and trading 
activity on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See note 3.
    \6\ See Securities and Exchange Release No. 77913 (May 25, 
2016), 81 FR 35081 (June 1, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-074).
    \7\ See note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to simply add the cross-references for the 
options rules alongside the equity rule for clarity. This rule change 
is consistent with the intent of the rule proposal which adopted 
Chapter III, Section 16.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that the rules of the 
Exchange are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, it [sic] is designed to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general 
to protect investors and the public interest by making clear within 
Rule 9400 that violations of Chapter III, Section 16 are subject to 
disciplinary action pursuant to Rule 9400 as stated in the Exchange's 
rule filing.\11\ This cross-reference will provide clarity to members 
and ease of reference to the

[[Page 79069]]

corresponding options rule. The proposed rule change is non-
controversial. The addition of the cross-reference is for clarity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ See note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This non-controversial rule 
change will merely add the reference to the options rule next to the 
current reference for the equity rule to make clear, as noted in the 
rule changes, that violations of either rule relating to disruptive 
quoting and trading activity, will be disciplined pursuant to Rule 
9400.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the 
Act \14\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date 
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \15\ permits the Commission to 
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes 
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest because it would allow 
the Exchange to immediately add the cross-reference within Rule 9400 
which would provide clarity to members. The Exchange notes that a rule 
change to permit Rule 9400 to apply to violations of Chapter III, 
Section 16 was previously filed with the Commission. However, that 
filing failed to amend the rule text of Rule 9400 and only discussed 
the intended application of Rule 9400 to violations of Chapter III, 
Section 16 in the purpose section of the Form 19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the rule governs what actions the Exchange can 
take.\16\ However, because the description in the original filing sets 
forth what the Exchange intended the rule to cover, and this proposed 
rule change corrects an oversight by the Exchange in the previous 
filing, the Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay 
\17\ is consistent with the protection of investors and the public 
interest and designates the proposal operative on filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Section 6(b)(1) of the Act. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-146 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-146. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-146 and should 
be submitted on or before December 1, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-27150 Filed 11-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
79068 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Notices

No. 1 further clarified CBOE’s I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Background
background discussion of how quotes Statement of the Terms of Substance of The Exchange filed a rule change to
and orders are cancelled pursuant to the the Proposed Rule Change adopt an options rule to clearly prohibit
QRM Mechanism in order to harmonize disruptive quoting and trading activity
the description of the existing rule with The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 9400, entitled ‘‘Expedited Client on the Exchange and to permit the
the text of Rule 8.18. Both of these Exchange to take prompt action to
changes are consistent with the proposal Suspension Proceeding’’ to include a
cross-reference for clarification. suspend members or their clients that
as initially filed, and simply add detail violate such rule pursuant to Rule
to the filing to resolve internal The text of the proposed rule change 9400.5 The Exchange had previously
inconsistencies. The changes do not is available on the Exchange’s Web site adopted Rule 9400 to set forth
introduce material, new, or novel at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at procedures for issuing suspension
concepts. Accordingly, the Commission the principal office of the Exchange, and orders, immediately prohibiting a
finds good cause, pursuant to Section at the Commission’s Public Reference member from conducting continued
19(b)(2) of the Act,53 to approve the Room. disruptive quoting and trading activity
proposed rule change, as modified by on the Exchange.6 Rule 9400 provides
Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the Exchange the authority to order a
basis. member to cease and desist from
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
VI. Conclusion Change providing access to the Exchange to a
client of the member that is conducting
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to In its filing with the Commission, the disruptive quoting and trading activity
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,54 that the Exchange included statements in violation of Rule 2170. The Exchange
proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2016– concerning the purpose of and basis for also previously adopted Rule 2400 to
053), as modified by Amendment No. 1, the proposed rule change and discussed specifically define and prohibit
be, and hereby is, approved on an any comments it received on the disruptive equities quoting and trading
accelerated basis. proposed rule change. The text of these activity on the Exchange.7 Chapter III,
For the Commission, by the Division of statements may be examined at the Section 16 is identical to Rule 2400,
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated places specified in Item IV below. The however applicable to options.
authority.55 Exchange has prepared summaries, set Similarly, Chapter III, Section 16
Brent J. Fields, forth in sections A, B, and C below, of prohibits members from engaging in or
Secretary. the most significant aspects of such facilitating disruptive options quoting
[FR Doc. 2016–27153 Filed 11–9–16; 8:45 am] statements. and trading activity on the Exchange.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
The Exchange proposes to simply add
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s the cross-references for the options rules
Statement of the Purpose of, and alongside the equity rule for clarity.
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule This rule change is consistent with the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Change intent of the rule proposal which
COMMISSION
1. Purpose adopted Chapter III, Section 16.8
[Release No. 34–79240; File No. SR– 2. Statutory Basis
NASDAQ–2016–146] The Exchange is filing this proposal to
amend Rule 9400, entitled ‘‘Expedited The Exchange believes that its
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Client Suspension Proceeding’’ to proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of include a cross-reference Chapter III, of the Act,9 in general, and furthers the
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Section 16, entitled ‘‘Disruptive Quoting objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule and Trading Activity Prohibited’’ within in particular, in that the rules of the
9400 To Include a Cross-Reference Rule 9400. The Exchange filed a rule Exchange are designed to prevent
change to adopt an options rule, fraudulent and manipulative acts and
November 4, 2016. identical to equities Rule 2170, which practices, it [sic] is designed to promote
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the relates to disruptive quoting and trading just and equitable principles of trade, to
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 activity.3 In that rule change, it stated remove impediments to and perfect the
(‘‘Act’’)1, and Rule 19b-4 2 thereunder, that ‘‘[t]he Exchange will initiate mechanism of a free and open market
notice is hereby given that, on October disciplinary action for violations of and a national market system, and, in
25, 2016, The NASDAQ Stock Market Chapter III, Section 16, pursuant to Rule general to protect investors and the
LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed 9400.’’ 4 At that time, the Exchange public interest by making clear within
with the Securities and Exchange inadvertently did not include the cross- Rule 9400 that violations of Chapter III,
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) references to Chapter III, Section 16 Section 16 are subject to disciplinary
the proposed rule change as described within Rule 9400. The Exchange action pursuant to Rule 9400 as stated
in Items I and II below, which Items proposes to add references to Chapter in the Exchange’s rule filing.11 This
have been prepared by the Exchange. III, Section 16 within Rule 9400 for cross-reference will provide clarity to
The Commission is publishing this clarity. This rule change is non- members and ease of reference to the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

notice to solicit comments on the controversial.
5 See note 3.
proposed rule change from interested 6 See Securities and Exchange Release No. 77913
persons. 3 See Securities and Exchange Release No. 78208
(May 25, 2016), 81 FR 35081 (June 1, 2016) (SR–
(June 30, 2016), 81 FR 44366 (July 7, 2016) (SR–
NASDAQ–2016–074).
53 15
NASDAQ–2016–092).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 4 See Securities and Exchange Release No. 78208
7 See note 3.
54 See id. 8 See note 3.
(June 30, 2016), 81 FR 44366, 44370 (July 7, 2016)
55 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
(SR–NASDAQ–2016–092). Rule 9400 is located
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
within the Code of Procedure rules which apply to
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. both equities and options violations. 11 See note 4.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:43 Nov 09, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Notices 79069

corresponding options rule. The of Rule 9400 to violations of Chapter III, submission, all subsequent
proposed rule change is non- Section 16 in the purpose section of the amendments, all written statements
controversial. The addition of the cross- Form 19b–4. with respect to the proposed rule
reference is for clarity. The text of the rule governs what change that are filed with the
actions the Exchange can take.16 Commission, and all written
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s However, because the description in the communications relating to the
Statement on Burden on Competition original filing sets forth what the proposed rule change between the
The Exchange does not believe that Exchange intended the rule to cover, Commission and any person, other than
the proposed rule change will impose and this proposed rule change corrects those that may be withheld from the
any burden on competition not an oversight by the Exchange in the public in accordance with the
necessary or appropriate in furtherance previous filing, the Commission provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
of the purposes of the Act. This non- believes that waiving the 30-day available for Web site viewing and
controversial rule change will merely operative delay 17 is consistent with the printing in the Commission’s Public
add the reference to the options rule protection of investors and the public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
next to the current reference for the interest and designates the proposal Washington, DC 20549, on official
equity rule to make clear, as noted in operative on filing. business days between the hours of
the rule changes, that violations of At any time within 60 days of the 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
either rule relating to disruptive quoting filing of the proposed rule change, the filing also will be available for
and trading activity, will be disciplined Commission summarily may inspection and copying at the principal
pursuant to Rule 9400. temporarily suspend such rule change if office of the Exchange. All comments
it appears to the Commission that such received will be posted without change;
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s action is necessary or appropriate in the the Commission does not edit personal
Statement on Comments on the public interest, for the protection of identifying information from
Proposed Rule Change Received From investors, or otherwise in furtherance of submissions. You should submit only
Members, Participants, or Others the purposes of the Act. If the information that you wish to make
No written comments were either Commission takes such action, the available publicly. All submissions
solicited or received. Commission will institute proceedings should refer to File Number SR–
to determine whether the proposed rule NASDAQ–2016–146 and should be
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
change should be approved or submitted on or before December 1,
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
disapproved. 2016.
Commission Action
IV. Solicitation of Comments For the Commission, by the Division of
Because the foregoing proposed rule Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
change does not: (i) significantly affect Interested persons are invited to authority.18
the protection of investors or the public submit written data, views and Brent J. Fields,
interest; (ii) impose any significant arguments concerning the foregoing, Secretary.
burden on competition; and (iii) become including whether the proposed rule
[FR Doc. 2016–27150 Filed 11–9–16; 8:45 am]
operative for 30 days from the date on change is consistent with the Act.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
which it was filed, or such shorter time Comments may be submitted by any of
as the Commission may designate, it has the following methods:
become effective pursuant to Section Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 12 and Rule 19b– COMMISSION
4(f)(6) thereunder.13 • Use the Commission’s Internet
A proposed rule change filed comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ [Release No. 34–79239; File No. SR–MSRB–
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the rules/sro.shtml); or 2016–14]
Act 14 normally does not become • Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Self-Regulatory Organizations;
operative for 30 days after the date of its Municipal Securities Rulemaking
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 15 NASDAQ–2016–146 on the subject line.
Board; Notice of Filing and Immediate
permits the Commission to designate a Paper Comments Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
shorter time if such action is consistent
• Send paper comments in triplicate Change To Establish Fees Related to
with the protection of investors and the the MSRB Academic Historical
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
public interest. The Exchange believes Transaction Data Product
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
that waiving the 30-day operative delay
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
is consistent with the protection of November 4, 2016.
investors and the public interest All submissions should refer to File Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
because it would allow the Exchange to Number SR–NASDAQ–2016–146. This Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
immediately add the cross-reference file number should be included on the ‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule
within Rule 9400 which would provide subject line if email is used. To help the 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
clarity to members. The Exchange notes Commission process and review your given that on October 25, 2016 the
that a rule change to permit Rule 9400 comments more efficiently, please use Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
to apply to violations of Chapter III, only one method. The Commission will (the ‘‘MSRB’’ or ‘‘Board’’) filed with the
post all comments on the Commission’s
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Section 16 was previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
Commission. However, that filing failed Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
to amend the rule text of Rule 9400 and rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the change as described in Items I, II, and
only discussed the intended application III below, which Items have been
16 See Section 6(b)(1) of the Act. 15 U.S.C.

78f(b)(1).
prepared by the MSRB. The
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 17 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:43 Nov 09, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1
Document Created: 2016-11-10 01:44:03
Document Modified: 2016-11-10 01:44:03
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		81 FR 79068