81 FR 8043 - Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 31 (February 17, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 31 (February 17, 2016)
| Page Range | 8043-8044 | |
| FR Document | 2016-03252 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 8043-8044] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-03252] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-475-818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 7, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review of certain pasta (pasta) from Italy and gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 47467 (August 7, 2015) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, these final results differ from the Preliminary Results with respect to Rummo S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio (the Rummo Group).\2\ For the final weighted-average dumping margins, see the ``Final Results of Review'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The Rummo Group consists of Rummo S.p.A., Lenta Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, and Rummo S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio. In this review, we found that the facts have not changed with respect to Rummo and its affiliates and therefore, we followed the same methodology as we did in the most recent completed review (AR 17) by collapsing the affiliated companies as the Rummo Group. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Final Results of 17th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 8604 (February 18, 2015) (AR 17 Final Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective: February 17, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang (La Molisana) or George McMahon (the Rummo Group), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 7, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. On August 10, 2015, La Molisana submitted a request for a hearing, which was withdrawn on October 27, 2015.\3\ On October 5, 2015, Petitioners, La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana) \4\ and the Rummo Group submitted their case briefs. October 9, 2015, the Department revised the briefing schedule.\5\ On October 15, 2015, Petitioners, La Molisana and the Rummo Group submitted their rebuttal briefs. As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now February 9, 2016.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Rummo filed a request for a hearing on September 9, 2015, which the Department rejected on September 9, 2015, as being untimely filed. \4\ On October 6, 2015, La Molisana submitted a correction to an item stated in its October 5, 2015 case brief. \5\ The Department also postponed the briefing schedule in several Memoranda to All Interested Parties, dated August 12, 2015, September 8, 2015, September 11, 2015, and September 28, 2015. \6\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from Italy; 2013-2014'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and incorporated herein by reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded is attached to this notice as Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have recalculated La Molisana's and the Rummo Group's weighted-average dumping margins. However, La Molisana's adjustments did not affect the calculated final margin.\8\ [[Page 8044]] As a result of the aforementioned recalculation of the Rummo Group's rate, the weighted-average dumping margin for the two non-selected companies has changed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from Joy Zhang, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation Memorandum--La Molisana,'' dated February 9, 2016, and Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from George McMahon, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation Memorandum--the Rummo Group,'' dated February 9, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, the Department determines the following weighted-average dumping margins \9\ for the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ The margin for the non-examined companies was based on the calculated weighted-average margin of La Molisana (the sole mandatory respondent receiving an above de minimis margin in these final results). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer and/or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ La Molisana S.p.A........................................... 12.90 Rummo S.p.A., Lenta Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, and 0.00 Rummo S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio (collectively, the Rummo Group)..................................................... Pastificio Andalini S.p.A................................... 12.90 Delverde Industrie Alimentari S.p.A......................... 12.90 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\10\ For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), the Department will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ In these final results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all- others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by the section 129 determination. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: February 9, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary I. Background Scope of the Order II. List of Comments III. Analysis of Comments La Molisana Comment 1: Pasta Shape Comment 2: General and Administrative (G&A) Ratio Comment 3: Indirect Selling Expenses Comment 4: Direct Materials Calculation Comment 5: Direct Selling Expenses Comment 6: Applying Differential Pricing Analysis The Rummo Group Comment 7: Treatment of Pasta Castiglioni's Home Market Control Numbers Comment 8: Treatment of Matching U.S. Sales with Home Market Sales Comment 9: Treatment of the Manufacturers, Rummo and Pasta Castiglioni Comment 10: Treatment of the Rummo Group's Freight Revenue Comment 11: Application of a Cap for Certain U.S. Market Freight Revenue (FRTREVU) Comment 12: Application of a Countervailing Duty Offset (CVDU) to Rummo Comment 13: Treatment of Negative Margins Associated with the Differential Pricing (DP) Methodology IV. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-03252 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 8043
Investigations.1 The published Federal final weighted-average dumping Scope of the Order
Register notice contained a clerical error margins, see the ‘‘Final Results of Imports covered by the order are
stating that ‘‘{p}ursuant to sections Review’’ section below. shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta.
751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6) of the Act, the DATES: Effective: February 17, 2016. The merchandise subject to review is
Department intends to initiate the next currently classifiable under items
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
five-year sunset reviews of the 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Zhang (La Molisana) or George
antidumping duty order on CTL plate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
McMahon (the Rummo Group), AD/CVD
from the PRC and the Agreements on United States (HTSUS). Although the
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine not HTSUS subheadings are provided for
Compliance, International Trade
later than November 2019.’’ 2 The Notice convenience and customs purposes, the
Administration, U.S. Department of
should have read that the Department written description of the merchandise
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
intends to initiate the above-referenced subject to the order is dispositive.7
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
next five-year sunset reviews not later
telephone: (202) 482–1168 or (202) 482– Analysis of Comments Received
than November 2020.
This notice serves to correct the 1167, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
All issues raised in the case and
incorrect initiation date of the next five- rebuttal briefs by parties to this
year sunset reviews in the Continuation Background administrative review are addressed in
Notice. This correction is published in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
accordance with section 777(i) of the On August 7, 2015, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published A list of the issues that parties raised
Act. and to which we responded is attached
the Preliminary Results. In accordance
Dated: February 10, 2016.
with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we to this notice as Appendix. The Issues
Paul Piquado, invited parties to comment on our and Decision Memorandum is a public
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Preliminary Results. On August 10, document and is on-file electronically
Compliance. 2015, La Molisana submitted a request via Enforcement and Compliance’s
[FR Doc. 2016–03255 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] for a hearing, which was withdrawn on Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P October 27, 2015.3 On October 5, 2015, Centralized Electronic Service System
Petitioners, La Molisana S.p.A. (La (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
Molisana) 4 and the Rummo Group registered users at http://
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE submitted their case briefs. October 9, access.trade.gov and in the Central
2015, the Department revised the Records Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the
International Trade Administration main Department of Commerce
briefing schedule.5 On October 15, 2015,
[A–475–818] Petitioners, La Molisana and the building. In addition, a complete
Rummo Group submitted their rebuttal version of the Issues and Decision
Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results briefs. As explained in the Memorandum can be accessed directly
of Antidumping Duty Administrative memorandum from the Acting Assistant on the Internet at http://
Review; 2013–2014 Secretary for Enforcement and enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
Compliance, the Department has The signed Issues and Decision
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Memorandum and the electronic
International Trade Administration, exercised its discretion to toll all
administrative deadlines due to the versions of the Issues and Decision
Department of Commerce. Memorandum are identical in content.
SUMMARY: On August 7, 2015, the recent closure of the Federal
Department of Commerce (the Government. All deadlines in this Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Department) published the preliminary segment of the proceeding have been
Based on a review of the record and
results of the antidumping duty extended by four business days. The
comments received from interested
administrative review of certain pasta revised deadline for the final results of
parties regarding our Preliminary
(pasta) from Italy and gave interested this review is now February 9, 2016.6
Results, we have recalculated La
parties an opportunity to comment on Molisana’s and the Rummo Group’s
the Preliminary Results.1 S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio. In this review, we found
weighted-average dumping margins.
The period of review (POR) is July 1, that the facts have not changed with respect to
Rummo and its affiliates and therefore, we followed However, La Molisana’s adjustments did
2013, through June 30, 2014. As a result the same methodology as we did in the most recent not affect the calculated final margin.8
of our analysis of the comments and completed review (AR 17) by collapsing the
information received, these final results affiliated companies as the Rummo Group. See 7 For a full description of the scope of the order,
differ from the Preliminary Results with Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Final Results of see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
17th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
respect to Rummo S.p.A. Molino e 2012–2013, 80 FR 8604 (February 18, 2015) (AR 17
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Pastificio (the Rummo Group).2 For the Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from
Final Results). Italy; 2013–2014’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
3 Rummo filed a request for a hearing on
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
1 See Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order on September 9, 2015, which the Department rejected Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the on September 9, 2015, as being untimely filed. Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
People’s Republic of China and Continuation of 4 On October 6, 2015, La Molisana submitted a
Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice
Suspended Antidumping Duty Investigations on correction to an item stated in its October 5, 2015 (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the case brief. incorporated herein by reference.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Russian Federation and Ukraine, 80 FR 79306 5 The Department also postponed the briefing 8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also
(December 21, 2015) (‘‘Continuation Notice’’). schedule in several Memoranda to All Interested Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B.
2 Id. at 79307.
Parties, dated August 12, 2015, September 8, 2015, Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from Joy
1 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary September 11, 2015, and September 28, 2015. Zhang, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ‘‘Certain Pasta
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 6 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron from Italy: Calculation Memorandum—La
Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 47467 (August 7, 2015) Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Molisana,’’ dated February 9, 2016, and
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B.
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from
2 The Rummo Group consists of Rummo S.p.A., Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ George McMahon, Case Analyst, Office III, titled
Lenta Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, and Rummo dated January 27, 2016. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:05 Feb 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM 17FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_8074/page/1.svg)
![8044 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices
As a result of the aforementioned Cash Deposit Requirements APO materials, or conversion to judicial
recalculation of the Rummo Group’s The following cash deposit protective order, is hereby requested.
rate, the weighted-average dumping requirements will be effective upon Failure to comply with the regulations
margin for the two non-selected publication of the notice of final results and the terms of an APO is a
companies has changed. of administrative review for all sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
Final Results of the Review shipments of subject merchandise
notice in accordance with sections
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
As a result of this review, the 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
for consumption on or after the
Department determines the following CFR 351.213(h).
publication of the final results of this
weighted-average dumping margins 9 for administrative review, as provided by Dated: February 9, 2016.
the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash Paul Piquado,
2014: deposit rate for respondents noted above Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
will be the rate established in the final Compliance.
Weighted- results of this administrative review; (2)
average Appendix
Producer and/or exporter dumping
for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues
margin
(percent) in this administrative review but and Decision Memorandum
covered in a prior segment of the Summary
La Molisana S.p.A. ..................... 12.90 proceeding, the cash deposit rate will I. Background
Rummo S.p.A., Lenta Scope of the Order
continue to be the company specific rate II. List of Comments
Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, published for the most recently
and Rummo S.p.A. Molino e III. Analysis of Comments
Pastificio (collectively, the
completed segment of this proceeding;
La Molisana
Rummo Group) ....................... 0.00 (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. ............ 12.90 in this review, a prior review, or the Comment 1: Pasta Shape
original investigation, but the Comment 2: General and Administrative
Delverde Industrie Alimentari
(G&A) Ratio
S.p.A. ...................................... 12.90 manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
Comment 3: Indirect Selling Expenses
will be the rate established for the most Comment 4: Direct Materials Calculation
Duty Assessment recently completed segment of this Comment 5: Direct Selling Expenses
proceeding for the manufacturer of the Comment 6: Applying Differential Pricing
The Department shall determine and subject merchandise; and (4) the cash Analysis
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) deposit rate for all other manufacturers
The Rummo Group
shall assess antidumping duties on all or exporters will continue to be 15.45
appropriate entries.10 For any percent, the all-others rate established Comment 7: Treatment of Pasta Castiglioni’s
individually examined respondents Home Market Control Numbers
in the antidumping investigation as
Comment 8: Treatment of Matching U.S.
whose weighted-average dumping modified by the section 129 Sales with Home Market Sales
margin is above de minimis, we determination. These cash deposit Comment 9: Treatment of the Manufacturers,
calculated importer-specific ad valorem requirements, when imposed, shall Rummo and Pasta Castiglioni
duty assessment rates based on the ratio remain in effect until further notice. Comment 10: Treatment of the Rummo
of the total amount of dumping Group’s Freight Revenue
calculated for the importer’s examined Notification to Importers Regarding the Comment 11: Application of a Cap for
sales to the total entered value of those Reimbursement of Duties Certain U.S. Market Freight Revenue
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR This notice also serves as a final (FRTREVU)
Comment 12: Application of a Countervailing
351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final reminder to importers of their Duty Offset (CVDU) to Rummo
results of this administrative review, if responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Comment 13: Treatment of Negative Margins
any importer-specific assessment rates to file a certificate regarding the Associated with the Differential Pricing
calculated in the final results are above reimbursement of antidumping and/or (DP) Methodology
de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), countervailing duties prior to IV. Recommendation
the Department will issue instructions liquidation of the relevant entries [FR Doc. 2016–03252 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am]
directly to CBP to assess antidumping during the POR. Failure to comply with BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
duties on appropriate entries. this requirement could result in the
We intend to issue assessment Department’s presumption that
instructions directly to CBP 15 days reimbursement of antidumping and/or DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
after publication of the final results of countervailing duties occurred and the
this review. subsequent assessment of doubled International Trade Administration
antidumping duties. [A–570–601]
‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation Administrative Protective Order
Memorandum—the Rummo Group,’’ dated Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
February 9, 2016. This notice also serves as a reminder Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,
9 The margin for the non-examined companies to parties subject to administrative From the People’s Republic of China:
was based on the calculated weighted-average protective orders (APO) of their
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty
margin of La Molisana (the sole mandatory responsibility concerning the return or
respondent receiving an above de minimis margin New Shipper Review; 2014–2015
in these final results). destruction of proprietary information
10 In these final results, the Department applied disclosed under APO in accordance AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which International Trade Administration,
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the continues to govern business Department of Commerce
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and DATES: Effective February 17, 2016.
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
proprietary information in this segment
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 of the proceeding. Timely written FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(February 14, 2012). notification of the return/destruction of Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:05 Feb 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM 17FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_8074/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-17 01:16:55
Document Modified: 2016-02-17 01:16:55
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective: February 17, 2016. | |
| Contact | Joy Zhang (La Molisana) or George McMahon (the Rummo Group), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 8043 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR