81 FR 81033 - Adjustments to Cost Recovery Fees Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas, and Sulfur Activities on the Outer Continental Shelf
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 222 (November 17, 2016)
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 222 (November 17, 2016)
| Page Range | 81033-81049 | |
| FR Document | 2016-27500 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 81033-81049] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-27500] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement 30 CFR Part 250 [Docket ID: BSEE-2016-0003; 17XE1700DX EEEE500000 EX1SF0000.DAQ000] RIN 1014-AA31 Adjustments to Cost Recovery Fees Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas, and Sulfur Activities on the Outer Continental Shelf AGENCY: Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) currently charges a fee for 31 different services (hereafter ``cost recovery fees'') it provides to non-Federal recipients. The services were identified by BSEE's predecessor agency, the Minerals Management Service (MMS). This proposed rule would revise and clarify the existing fees; add new fees for certain services; revise and codify the existing conditions for refunding fees; and clarify the acceptable methods of fee payment. This proposed rule would enable BSEE to recover its full costs associated with providing these services to recipients of special benefits beyond those accruing to the general public. DATES: BSEE will consider all comments received by January 17, 2017. BSEE may not consider comments received after this date. Submit comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on the information collection burden in this proposed rule by December 19, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule by any of the following methods. Please use the Regulatory Identifier Number (RIN) 1014-AA31 as an identifier to your message. See also Public Availability of Comments under Procedural Matters.Submit comments electronically. Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for ``BSEE-2016-0003.'' Follow the instructions to submit public comments and view supporting and related materials available for this rulemaking. BSEE will post all relevant comments. Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the Interior (DOI); Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement; Attention: Regulations and Standards Branch; 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166. Please reference Adjustment of Service Fees Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas, and Sulfur Activities on the Outer Continental Shelf, AA31 in your comments and include your name and return address. Comments on the information collection contained in this proposed rule are separate from those on the substance of the proposed rule. Send comments on the information collection burden in this rule to: OMB, Interior Desk Officer, 202-395-5806 (fax); email [email protected]. Please also send a copy to BSEE at [email protected], fax number (703) 787-1546, or by the address listed above. Public Availability of Comments--Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Monaco, Budget Analyst, Office of Budget at (703) 787-1658, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background A. BSEE Statutory and Regulatory Authority B. Summary of Existing Cost Recovery Fees Regulations and Basis for Proposed Amendments C. Request for Comments on Potential Future Fees II. Procedural Matters I. Background A. BSEE Statutory and Regulatory Authority In accordance with the Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1952, 31 U.S.C. 9701 and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-25,\1\ BSEE is required to assess a charge against each identifiable non-Federal recipient of special benefits derived from BSEE services beyond those received by the public at large. The charge BSEE assesses is legally sufficient if it recovers BSEE's full cost to provide the service. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-25 Revised, User Charges, July 8, 1993, and Transmittal Memorandum 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OMB Circular A-25 requires a Federal agency to conduct a biennial review of its user charges to determine whether adjustments are necessary and to review other agency programs to determine whether new fees should be established for any services it provides. BSEE reviewed its 31 services and pre-production site visits along with the associated cost recovery fees to determine whether the cost of providing each of the services supports the existing fee structure in the existing regulations. BSEE's methodology for calculating its direct and indirect costs to perform the 31 services and the pre-production site visits is found later in this document. Results from the direct and indirect cost calculations indicate that 17 fees should be increased, eight fees reduced, and six fees subdivided into two tiers by complexity, with six of the subdivided fees increasing above the existing undivided fee, and six decreasing. The results also indicate that the existing pre-production site visit fees for two of the facility production safety system applications should be decreased for visits to facilities offshore and increased for visits to facilities while in a shipyard. Finally, the results suggest that new pre- production site visit fees should be implemented for the four facility production safety system applications that did not previously include site visit fees. The details of these proposed fees are shown in the Service Fee Table later in this document. The fees are codified in BSEE's regulations at 30 CFR 250.125(a). This proposed rule would: (1) Amend 31 of the cost recovery fees in existing Sec. 250.125; (2) establish two tiers of fees within the Deepwater Operations Plans (DWOPs), New Pipeline Applications, Pipeline Modification Applications for both Lease Term and Right-of-way (ROW) Pipelines, ROW Pipeline Grant Applications, and Unitization Revisions fee categories; (3) add four new pre-production site visit cost recovery fees to the existing two pre-production site visit fees to support the review and approval, if necessary, of production [[Page 81034]] safety system applications; (4) revise the two existing pre-production site visit cost recovery fees; (5) amend and codify conditions for granting fee payment refunds in the existing Notice to Lessees and Operators (NTL) No. 2009-N09; \2\ (6) amend Sec. 250.126 to provide clarification on the payment of cost recovery fees and the acceptable payment methods; and 7) include descriptions of the two complexity- based levels of service fees in 30 CFR 250.292 (DWOPs), Sec. 250.1000 (Applications to install or modify lease term pipelines), Sec. 250.1015 (Applications for pipeline ROW grants)), and Sec. 250.1303 (Requests for voluntary unitization). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Minerals Management Service, MMS Policy on Refund Requests for Service Fees, NTL No. 2009-N09, November 1, 2009. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to BSEE's in-depth review of the bureau's existing cost recovery fees, the need for adjustments is further supported by the fact that, with the exception of adjustments for inflation, BSEE's cost recovery fees have not been adjusted since the 2005 and 2006 rulemakings establishing the fees (see 70 FR 49871 (August 25, 2005) and 71 FR 40904 (July 19, 2006)). Over the last ten years, offshore operations have moved into deeper, more complex, and more hostile environments. This evolution of offshore operations has resulted in increasingly technical and more complex requests submitted by operators. Reviewing and approving these requests requires extensive communication and collaboration between offshore operators, BSEE engineers, and BSEE subject matter experts (SMEs) who are knowledgeable about the safety and environmental aspects of the current technologies and operational challenges, which require additional time and more experienced, senior-level individuals at higher pay grades to review and approve. In addition, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012 authorized BSEE to ``establish higher minimum rates of basic pay for employees of the Department of the Interior in the Gulf of Mexico Region in the Geophysicist (GS-1313), Geologist (GS-1350), and Petroleum Engineer (GS-0881) job series at grades 5 through 15 at rates no greater than 25 percent above the minimum rates of basic pay normally scheduled . . .'' Public Law 112-74, sec. 121(c) (Dec. 23, 2011). In August 2015, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) increased the special pay for the job series identified in Public Law 112-74, sec. 121(c) (Dec. 23, 2011) to 35 percent above basic pay and also used its authority to establish the same 35 percent special pay rate for the Inspectors (GS-1801) job series. These special pay rates have allowed the Bureau to be competitive with the oil and gas industry in attracting and retaining qualified personnel, but have increased the bureau's personnel costs. For these reasons, BSEE's costs to provide certain services have increased over the levels set out in the existing regulations including, but not limited to, the costs to process applications for permits to drill and applications for permits to modify. For other services, the proposed fees may be lower than the existing fees due to an overall reduced cost to provide those services (i.e., efficiencies). The proposed adjustments are based on an analysis of BSEE's costs for providing services from fiscal year (FY) 2013 to FY 2015. The proposed fee adjustments are necessary to more accurately align fees with the cost of BSEE's services provided to the non-Federal recipients. BSEE invites comments on each of the proposed fee adjustments described later in this document. B. Summary of Existing Cost Recovery Fees Regulations and Basis for Proposed Amendments Existing Sec. Sec. 250.125 and 250.126 set out the amount of cost recovery fees for each BSEE service and provide instructions for making payments. Section 250.125(a) lists the 31 cost recovery fees currently imposed by BSEE for specific services. Section 250.125(b) requires that payment of the applicable fee(s) must accompany the request for service and provides that all fees are non-refundable. Section 250.125(c) requires the submission of a written request and accompanying payment within 72 hours of a BSEE verbal approval. Section 250.126 requires that all cost recovery fees be paid electronically through www.pay.gov. BSEE proposes to amend Sec. 250.125 by revising the fees for specific services based on its in-depth review and incorporating guidance from NTL No. 2009-N09 regarding conditions for granting fee payment refunds. BSEE proposes amendments to Sec. 250.126 to provide clarification on the payment of cost recovery fees and the acceptable payment methods. BSEE also proposes to amend the following other sections of 30 CFR part 250 that are subject to the proposed Sec. 250.125 amendments in this document: Sec. 250.292 (DWOPs); Sec. 250.1000 (Applications to install or modify lease term pipelines); Sec. 250.1015 (Applications for pipeline ROW grants); and Sec. 250.1303 (Requests for voluntary unitization). What Fees Would This Proposed Rule Adjust? BSEE is proposing adjustments to its 31 existing cost recovery fees to fully account for the costs of providing the services listed in the Service Fee Table below. Additionally, BSEE is proposing to amend Sec. 250.125(a) to: 1. Subdivide into two categories and add different fee levels for six types of cost recovery fees (DWOPs, New Pipeline Applications, Pipeline Modification Applications for both Lease Term and ROW Pipelines, ROW Pipeline Grant Applications, and Unitization Revisions) to accurately reflect the varying levels of complexity of the requested services and the corresponding levels of costs to BSEE from providing those services; \3\ and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The complexity-based fees for these services are specified in proposed Sec. Sec. 250.125(a)(2), (15)-(17), (19), and (28) and in the Service Fee Table in this document. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Add four new pre-production site visit fees and revise the two existing pre-productions site visit fees to support the review and approval of production safety system applications, if a site visit is deemed necessary. These new and revised site visit fees are proposed to be included in Sec. Sec. 250.125(a)(5)-(10). The following table lists the type of service to be performed by BSEE when it receives a plan, application, permit, or other request; the associated regulatory citation for each type of request; the existing and proposed fee; and the proposed acceptable payment type for each service. The proposed payment types are credit card and electronic check through the Automated Clearing House (ACH-debit). Because the current U.S. Treasury limit on credit card payments is $24,999.99, an ACH-debit must be used for payments of $25,000 or more. In the Service Fee Table below, the existing regulations are in regular font; proposed text is in italic font; and new fees are in bold font. The fifth column, payment type, is provided to explain the options for payment for a particular service. [[Page 81035]] Service Fee Table ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Service--processing of the following: 30 CFR citation Existing fee Proposed fee Payment type ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Suspension of Operations/ Sec. $2,123............... $3,055............... Credit Card or Suspension of Production (SOO/ 250.171(e). ACH-debit. SOP) Request. (2) Deepwater Operations Plan. Sec. $3,599............... 250.292(q). (a) Deepwater Operations Plan-- ................ ..................... $14,290.............. Credit Card or Simple. ACH-debit. (b) Deepwater Operations Plan- ................ ..................... $70,333.............. ACH-debit Only. Complex (New Technology). (3) Application for Permit to Sec. $2,113............... $10,420.............. Credit Card or Drill (APD; Form BSEE-0123). 250.410(d); ACH-debit. Sec. 250.513(b); Sec. 250.1617(a). (4) Application for Permit to Sec. $125................. $1,680............... Credit Card or Modify (APM; Form BSEE-0124). 250.465(b); ACH-debit. Sec. 250.513(b); Sec. 250.613(b); Sec. 250.1618(a); Sec. 250.1704(g). (5) New Facility Production Sec. 250.842.. $5,426............... $3,976............... Credit Card or Safety System Application for $14,280 additional $13,534 additional ACH-debit. Facility with More than 125 fee will be charged fee will be charged Components. if BSEE conducts a if BSEE conducts a pre-production pre-production inspection of a inspection of a facility offshore, facility offshore, and $7,426 for an and $14,567 for an inspection of a inspection of a facility while in a facility while in a shipyard. shipyard. A component is a A component is a piece of equipment piece of equipment or an ancillary or an ancillary system that is system that is protected by one or protected by one or more of the safety more of the safety devices required by devices required by American Petroleum API RP 14C (as Institute (API) incorporated by Recommended Practice reference in Sec. (RP) 14C (as 250.198). incorporated by reference in Sec. 250.198). (6) New Facility Production Sec. 250.842.. $1,314............... $548................. Credit Card or Safety System Application for $8,967 additional fee $8,508 additional fee ACH-debit. Facility with 25-125 will be charged if will be charged if Components. BSEE conducts a pre- BSEE conducts a pre- production production inspection of a inspection of a facility offshore, facility offshore, and $5,141 for an and $9,818 for an inspection of a inspection of a facility while in a facility while in a shipyard. shipyard. (7) New Facility Production Sec. 250.842.. $652................. $463................. Credit Card or Safety System Application for $4,338 additional fee ACH-debit. Facility with Fewer than 25 will be charged if Components. BSEE conducts a pre- production inspection of a facility offshore, and $1,967 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (8) Production Safety System Sec. 250.842.. $605................. $1,278............... Credit Card or Application--Modification $9,313 additional fee ACH-debit. with More than 125 Components will be charged if Reviewed. BSEE conducts a pre- production inspection of a facility offshore, and $8,100 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (9) Production Safety System Sec. 250.842.. $217................. $439................. Credit Card or Application--Modification $6,765 additional fee ACH-debit. with 25-125 Components will be charged if Reviewed. BSEE conducts a pre- production inspection of a facility offshore, and $7,326 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (10) Production Safety System Sec. 250.842.. $92.................. $386................. Credit Card or Application--Modification $4,513 additional fee ACH-debit. with Fewer than 25 Components will be charged if Reviewed. BSEE conducts a pre- production inspection of a facility offshore, and $2,141 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (11) Platform Application-- Sec. $22,734.............. $28,311.............. ACH-debit Only. Installation--Under the 250.905(l). Platform Verification Program. (12) Platform Application-- Sec. $3,256............... $1,914............... Credit Card or Installation--Fixed Structure 250.905(l). ACH-debit. Under the Platform Approval Program. (13) Platform Application-- Sec. $1,657............... $1,914............... Credit Card or Installation--Caisson/Well 250.905(l). ACH-debit. Protector. (14) Platform Application-- Sec. $3,884............... $1,975............... Credit Card or Modification/Repair. 250.905(l). ACH-debit. (15) New Pipeline Application ................ $3,541............... (Lease Term). [[Page 81036]] (a) New Pipeline Application Sec. ..................... $1,584............... Credit Card or (Lease Term)--Shallow Water 250.1000(b). ACH-debit. (less than 1000 ft.). (b) New Pipeline Application ................ ..................... $3,663............... Credit Card or (Lease Term)--Deepwater ACH-debit. (greater than 1000 ft.). (16) Pipeline Application-- ................ $2,056............... Modification (Lease Term). (a) Pipeline Application-- Sec. ..................... $651................. Credit Card or Modification (Lease Term)-- 250.1000(b). ACH-debit. Minor. (b) Pipeline Application-- ................ ..................... $1,696............... Credit Card or Modification (Lease Term)-- ACH-debit. Major. (17) Pipeline Application-- ................ $4,169............... Modification (ROW). (a) Pipeline Application-- Sec. ..................... $455................. Credit Card or Modification (ROW)--Minor. 250.1000(b). ACH-debit. (b) Pipeline Application-- ................ ..................... $1,800............... Credit Card or Modification (ROW)--Major. ACH-debit. (18) Pipeline Repair Sec. $388................. $557................. Credit Card or Notification. 250.1008(e). ACH-debit. (19) Pipeline ROW Grant ................ $2,771............... Application. (a) Pipeline ROW Grant Sec. ..................... $1,662............... Credit Card or Application--Shallow Water 250.1015(a). ACH-debit. (less than 1000 ft.). (b) Pipeline ROW Grant ................ ..................... $3,796............... Credit Card or Application--Deepwater ACH-debit. (greater than 1000 ft.). (20) Pipeline Conversion of Sec. $236................. $494................. Credit Card or Lease Term to ROW. 250.1015(a). ACH-debit. (21) Pipeline ROW Assignment.. Sec. $201................. $397................. Credit Card or 250.1018(b). ACH-debit. (22) 500 Feet From Lease/Unit Sec. $3,892............... $5,440............... Credit Card or Line Production Request. 250.1156(a). ACH-debit. (23) Gas Cap Production Sec. 250.1157. $4,953............... $11,962.............. Credit Card or Request. ACH-debit. (24) Downhole Commingling Sec. $5,779............... $14,064.............. Credit Card or Request. 250.1158(a). ACH-debit. (25) Complex Surface Sec. $4,056............... $8,205............... Credit Card or Commingling and Measurement 250.1202(a); ACH-debit. Application. Sec. 250.1203(b); Sec. 250.1204(a). (26) Simple Surface Sec. $1,371............... $3,514............... Credit Card or Commingling and Measurement 250.1202(a); ACH-debit. Application. Sec. 250.1203(b); Sec. 250.1204(a). (27) Voluntary Unitization Sec. $12,619.............. $27,288.............. ACH-debit Only. Proposal or Unit Expansion. 250.1303(d). (28) Unitization Revision..... ................ $896................. (a) Unitization Revision-- Sec. ..................... $1,683............... Credit Card or Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and 250.1303(d). ACH-debit. Successor Unit Operator/Sub- operator. (b) Unitization Revision-- ................ ..................... $3,255............... Credit Card or Exhibit C. ACH-debit. (29) Application to Remove a Sec. 250.1727. $4,684............... $2,846............... Credit Card or Platform or Other Facility. ACH-debit. (30) Application to Sec. $1,142............... $857................. Credit Card or Decommission a Pipeline 250.1751(a) or ACH-debit. (Lease Term). Sec. 250.1752(a). (31) Application to Sec. $2,170............... $980................. Credit Card or Decommission a Pipeline (ROW). 250.1751(a) or ACH-debit. Sec. 250.1752(a) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How did BSEE determine the costs to be recovered by the proposed fees? Federal agency policy covering full cost recovery through user charges is outlined in OMB Circular A-25. According to OMB Circular A- 25, BSEE should assess fees to recover the bureau's full costs of providing the services to the offshore oil and gas industry, rather than market price, because BSEE is acting on behalf of the United States to issue offshore oil and gas permits, approve DWOPs, and provide the other listed services. Therefore, BSEE used the full cost recovery approach, described in paragraph 6.d.1 of OMB Circular A-25, to assess the cost of each process. For each of the services provided by BSEE, the process begins with the submission of an application, plan, permit, or other request by an operator. BSEE typically provides the service requested when an operator submits a request and the associated user fee. The output of each service is BSEE's issuance of the permit or application/plan approval or denial. In order to determine the current cost of BSEE's services, BSEE assessed and itemized its services through data collection and dialogue with BSEE personnel in its Gulf of Mexico Regional Office (GOMR) and other BSEE SMEs. This process included the identification of each task undertaken by BSEE to review and approve each type of plan, application, permit, or other request. These tasks include: The initiating event or BSEE's receipt of a request for service; the identification of personnel to perform the review of the plan, application, permit, or other request; the review of the plan, application, permit, or other request; and the issuance of the permit or approval/denial of the application/plan. This information and the time spent performing each task were used to calculate BSEE's service costs, consistent with the procedures in OMB Circular A-25, as explained in the following discussion. [[Page 81037]] How were the direct costs calculated? The direct costs assessed as part of the full cost recovery analysis are direct labor costs, e.g., direct salary costs and fringe benefits for BSEE staff performing the requested services. Direct labor costs were established using the average work time provided by BSEE staff members for each task. The average time was then multiplied by the 2016 Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) General Schedule (GS) pay grade hourly rate for the employee responsible for completing that task. The GS pay grade was calculated at a step 5 level, which was estimated to be the average step within each pay grade. A range of GS pay grades are involved in certain actions (i.e., specific tasks might be accomplished by either a GS-7, 9, or 11 employee). In this case, BSEE averaged the hourly rate for a step 5 at all the grade levels that could accomplish the task to create an average hourly rate for that specific task. The following 2016 OPM GS rate tables were used to identify the appropriate hourly rate for the employee responsible for completing each task: (1) For any task completed by a petroleum engineer, OPM's 2016 special rate tables 711 and 712 were utilized. These tables provide petroleum engineers in GOMR and the Pacific OCS Region (POCSR) with a 35 percent increase above OPM's ``Base'' pay rate. (2) For any task completed by a geologist or geophysicist, OPM's 2016 special rate table 711 was utilized. This table provides geologists and geophysicists in Jefferson, LA and Camarillo, CA with a 35 percent increase above OPM's ``Base'' pay rate. Jefferson, LA includes the GOMR New Orleans District where the majority of these positions are located. (3) For all other tasks not covered by (1) or (2) above, the GS ``REST OF UNITED STATES'' 2016 rate table was used. Along with direct labor salary costs, OMB Circular A-25 requires the collection of direct labor costs classified as fringe benefits, which usually includes paid leave, medical insurance, and retirement. Historically, BSEE has calculated the fringe benefits as 28 percent of the direct salary costs and refers to that percentage as the ``fringe benefit factor.'' The fringe benefit factor was applied to all labor categories and grades for all cost recovery fee calculations. How were the indirect costs calculated? In accordance with OMB Circular A-25, indirect costs include personnel fringe benefits, all physical overhead costs, and management and supervisory costs. In accordance with OMB Circular A-25, BSEE assessed indirect costs for all headquarters, Regional, and District personnel and operations involved in the provision of services that are the subject of this proposed rule. These indirect costs include salaries and fringe benefits of personnel providing ancillary support functions, material and supply costs, utilities, and other costs that are allocated across all services provided by BSEE. BSEE has an extensive activity-based costing code table and cost capture database (Cost and Performance Management Tool (CPMT)) that categorizes all BSEE costs as either direct or indirect. Data from CPMT, going back to FY 2007, were analyzed to develop an appropriate methodology for estimating the indirect costs component of the cost recovery fees. Indirect costs were estimated using the historical ratio of indirect to direct costs observed at the headquarters, Regional, or District levels. From FY 2007 through FY 2015, the ratio was consistently between 51 and 56 percent. An average ratio of 53.51 percent was used. This percentage was applied to each service's direct cost to derive an indirect cost estimate for each service. The following table provides the indirect to direct cost data and ratios for BSEE and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's (BOEM) predecessor agencies, MMS and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, from FY 2007-FY 2011 and for BSEE from FY 2013-FY 2015.\4\ FY 2012 data were not included due to inaccurate tracking that occurred as BSEE and BOEM were established at the beginning of that fiscal year. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ BSEE and BOEM were created on October 1, 2011 as part of the DOI reorganization and division of responsibilities formerly exercised by MMS. Direct and Indirect Cost Data \1\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Indirect/ Direct total Indirect total direct cost Fiscal year cost ($ cost ($ ratio millions) millions) (percent) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2007............................................................ 205.62 110.75 53.86 2008............................................................ 203.42 114.35 56.22 2009............................................................ 219.36 120.14 54.77 2010............................................................ 222.91 114.88 51.54 2011............................................................ 244.25 135.10 55.31 2013............................................................ 113.27 58.26 51.43 2014............................................................ 138.21 74.50 53.91 2015............................................................ 159.97 81.68 51.06 Average..................................................... .............. .............. 53.51 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why are two fee levels proposed for some service categories? Two fee levels are proposed for certain applications, plans, permits, and other requests for BSEE services (e.g., simple DWOP vs. complex DWOP, or shallow water pipeline application (lease term) vs. deepwater pipeline application (lease term)) based on the varying levels of complexity, and resulting costs, associated with processing those requests. The six categories of BSEE services for which two tiers of complexity-based fees are proposed are identified in the following list, along with clarification for operators on which fee is more appropriate with regard to an application, plan, permit, or other request for these services: 1. DWOP: The complexity of processing a DWOP varies and depends on whether it includes new or unusual technology, as well as the scope and scale of the proposed development project. a. DWOP--Complex: An operator would submit payment for this service when a DWOP meets any of the following criteria: [[Page 81038]] The plan contains new or unusual technology, as defined in 30 CFR 250.200(b), and the new or unusual technology: --requires a high degree of specialized knowledge; --exceeds the limits of existing engineering standards; --conflicts with existing engineering standards; or --warrants an additional level of review due to the risk associated with implementation; or The plan includes installation of a new floating production facility. b. DWOP--Simple: An operator would submit payment for this service for all DWOPs that do not meet the criteria for Deepwater Operation Plans--Complex. This includes, but is not limited to: A new or unusual technology as defined in 30 CFR 250.200(b) that does not require a high degree of specialized knowledge. A new or unusual technology that is a modification or repair to an existing floating production facility or project. A subsea tieback to a new or existing floating production facility. A material change, addition or revision to an existing, previously approved project. A subsea tieback/additional well(s) for which only minor or no updates for subsea production safety system are necessary. Addition of a new subsea development to a new or existing floating production facility. 2. New Pipeline Application (Lease Term): The complexity of processing an application varies and is dependent on the water depth of the pipeline. a. New Pipeline Application (Lease Term)--Shallow Water: An operator would submit payment for this service when the pipeline in a New Pipeline Application (Lease Term) is located in its entirety in water depths less than or equal to 1,000 feet (ft.). b. New Pipeline Application (Lease Term)--Deepwater: An operator would submit payment for this service when any portion of the pipeline in a New Pipeline Application (Lease Term) is located in water depths greater than 1,000 ft. 3. Pipeline Application--Modification (Lease Term): The complexity of processing an application varies and is dependent on the complexity of the modification. a. Pipeline Application--Modification (Lease Term)--Major: An operator would submit payment for this service when a Pipeline Application--Modification (Lease Term) contains a route modification request. Actions which constitute a ``route modification'' include, but are not limited to, changing a pipeline route, installing a new portion of pipeline, decommissioning a portion of pipeline, and changing service or flow direction of a pipeline. b. Pipeline Application--Modification (Lease Term)--Minor: An operator would submit payment for this service for all other Pipeline Applications--Modification (Lease Term) requests (i.e., for all Pipeline Applications--Modification (Lease Term) requests that do not contain a route modification). 4. Pipeline Application--Modification (ROW): The complexity of processing an application varies and is dependent on the complexity of the modification. a. Pipeline Application--Modification (ROW)--Major. An operator would submit payment for this service when a Pipeline Application-- Modification (ROW) contains a route modification request. Actions that constitute a ``route modification'' include, but are not limited to, changing a pipeline route, installing a new portion of pipeline, decommissioning a portion of pipeline, and changing service or flow direction of a pipeline. b. Pipeline Application--Modification (ROW)--Minor: An operator would submit payment for this service for all other Pipeline Applications--Modification (ROW) requests (i.e., for all Pipeline Applications--Modification (ROW) requests that do not contain a route modification). An example is an ROW Grant Modification request for cessation of operations. 5. Pipeline ROW Grant Application: The complexity of processing an application varies and is dependent on the water depth of the pipeline. a. Pipeline ROW Grant Application--Shallow Water: An operator would submit payment for this service when the pipeline in a Pipeline ROW Grant Application is located in its entirety in water depths less than or equal to 1,000 ft. b. Pipeline ROW Grant Application--Deepwater: An operator would submit payment for this service when any portion of the pipeline in a Pipeline ROW Grant Application is located in water depths greater than 1,000 ft. 6. Unitization Revision: BSEE currently charges one fee for the review of a Unitization Revision; however, the complexity of processing the application and resulting cost vary based on the specific exhibits being revised in the signed unit agreement. Typical unitization applications contain an Exhibit A, which is the lease plat identifying the unit area; Exhibit B, which is a listing of the component leases and ownership of each; and Exhibit C, which is a listing of the participation and allocation by lease. Payment for unitization revision services are as follows: a. Unitization Revision--Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and Designation of Successor Unit Operator/Sub-operator: The Unit Operator would submit payment for this service when a Unitization Revision is submitted for approval that revises Exhibit A and/or Exhibit B of the signed unit agreement or designates a Successor Unit Operator and/or Successor Unit Sub-operator. b. Unitization Revision--Exhibit C: The Unit Operator would submit payment for this service when a Unitization Revision is submitted for approval that revises Exhibit C of the signed unit agreement. Why are there proposed new and adjusted fees for some services that involve BSEE site visits? In accordance with existing Sec. 250.800, production must not commence until the production safety system has been approved and a pre-production inspection has been requested by the lessee. If a BSEE application reviewer decides that a pre-production inspection is necessary as part of the production safety system application review and approval process, then a team of engineers and inspectors visits the facility offshore (e.g., a mobile offshore drilling unit) or at a shipyard. Existing Sec. Sec. 250.125(a)(5) and (6) establish fees for visiting a facility offshore or in a shipyard for two of the six production safety system applications, when necessary, as part of the BSEE review and approval process. Visits to an offshore facility or a shipyard can become necessary in order to verify that safety devices are in the proper locations or to identify if they are missing when compared with the associated application submitted for approval. Any necessary corrections to production safety systems can typically be handled more easily while construction work is ongoing in a shipyard, rather than when the facility is offshore. BSEE's costs for travel to offshore facilities and shipyard locations and for services, as part of the application review process, can be recovered in accordance with OMB Circular A-25. Estimates for BSEE's costs for these services include costs for transportation, lodging, and labor hours for each labor category involved. As illustrated in the Service Fee Table, under Sec. Sec. 250.125(a)(7)-(a)(10), BSEE proposes four new fees for production safety system visits to [[Page 81039]] offshore facilities or shipyards. BSEE also proposes to amend the two existing fees for production safety system inspection visits to offshore facilities or shipyards under Sec. Sec. 250.125(a)(5) and 250.125(a)(6). The proposed new and amended fees would affect: 1. New Facility Production Safety System Application for Facility with more than 125 components; 2. New Facility Production Safety System Application for Facility with 25-125 components; 3. New Facility Production Safety System Application for Facility with fewer than 25 components; 4. Production Safety System Application--Modification with more than 125 components reviewed; 5. Production Safety System Application--Modification with 25-125 components reviewed; and 6. Production Safety System Application--Modification with fewer than 25 components reviewed. Why are the adjustments to BSEE's cost recovery fees necessary? As previously mentioned, offshore operations have changed dramatically over the last ten years, which has led to adjustments in the review and approval process for a large portion of the services BSEE provides to industry. BSEE proposes the listed fee levels based on the assessment of the bureau's full costs to provide the associated services using the methodology described above. However, this full-cost methodology is not entirely comparable to the methodologies used in the 2005 and 2006 rulemakings that initially established the fees. The following examples provide the general rationale for some of the fee adjustments as compared to the fees in existing regulations. 1. BSEE's assessment of its costs for processing complex DWOPs indicates that six employees, ranging in grades from GS-5 through GS- 14, will spend between 310 and 1,094 hours reviewing, analyzing, and processing these plans. As previously discussed, the increased complexity of offshore operations has required additional senior-level employees to spend added time reviewing and approving these plans. This is particularly true with regard to the increased processing time of DWOPs and the associated increased costs to BSEE. In addition, the existing $3,599 fee for processing both complex and simple DWOPs does not account for the special pay that many BSEE employees receive for reviewing and approving these plans and the higher indirect cost ratio. The fee assessed for DWOP review has also not been adjusted since a 2006 rulemaking that established the existing fee. The adjusted fee is the result of calculations performed with input from BSEE Regional Offices and takes into account the increased complexity of submitted DWOPs due to the use of new or unusual technologies and the increased scope or scale of proposed plans. Based on its assessment, BSEE proposes to subdivide the DWOP processing fees and assess a $70,333 fee for processing complex DWOPs in 250.125(a)(2)(ii). 2. Similarly, BSEE proposes subdividing the fees for processing unitization revisions based on its assessment of the bureau's direct and indirect costs. Typically, seven BSEE positions, ranging in grades from GS-5 through GS-15, spend between 6.6 and 29.7 hours processing unitization revisions impacting exhibits A and B, while six BSEE positions spend between 8.5 to 71.9 hours processing unitization revisions impacting exhibit C. As is the case with the existing DWOP fee, the existing $896 fee for processing unitization revisions does not account for the special pay that many BSEE employees receive for reviewing and approving these documents and the higher indirect cost ratio. Based on its assessment, BSEE proposes a $1,683 fee for processing a unitization revision related to exhibits A and B and a $3,255 fee for processing a unitization revision related to exhibit C in 250.125(a)(28)(i) and (ii). 3. BSEE is also proposing to reduce some existing fees based on its assessment of the bureau's full costs to process applications and requests. For example, BSEE's assessment indicated that five BSEE employees, ranging in grades from GS-5 through GS-14, will spend between 5.8 and 12.5 hours processing an application for a minor lease term pipeline modification, resulting in $651 in full bureau costs. Since the existing fee of $2,056 was established, efficiencies have resulted in lower costs to process applications and requests (e.g., a technician now performs certain steps in the process previously performed by an engineer). Based on this assessment, BSEE proposes to subdivide and reduce the existing fee for processing both major and minor applications for lease term pipeline modifications in Sec. 250.125(a)(16)(i). C. Request for Comments on Potential Future Fees Due to the large number of revised applications received by BSEE and the associated costs to BSEE to process them, BSEE is currently evaluating the need for additional fees for revised applications for permits to drill (R-APD) and revised applications for permits to modify (R-APM). Accordingly, BSEE requests comments on whether separate fee levels for R-APD and R-APM should be proposed in a future rulemaking. BSEE also requests comments on the factors that should be the basis for determining the separate fee levels for R-APDs and R-APMs (e.g., complexity, water depth, etc.). II. Procedural Matters Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and 13563) E.O. 12866 provides that OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), will review all significant rules. BSEE has determined that this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by section 3(f) of E.O. 12866 because: --It is not expected to have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; --It would not adversely affect in a material way the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; --It would not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; --It would not alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights or obligations of their recipients; and --It would not raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in E.O. 12866. Accordingly, BSEE has not prepared an economic analysis, and OIRA has not reviewed this proposed rule. E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. E.O. 13563 directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives. It also emphasizes that regulations must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. BSEE is developing this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements. [[Page 81040]] Regulatory Flexibility Act The DOI certifies that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. (RFA). The RFA, at 5 U.S.C. 603, requires agencies to prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis to determine whether a regulation would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Further, under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, at section 212 of Public Law 104-121 (March 29, 1996), an agency is required to produce compliance guidance for small entities if the rule would have a significant economic impact. The Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis prepared by BSEE assessed the impact of this proposed rule on small entities, as defined by the applicable Small Business Administration (SBA) size standards. BSEE has determined that this proposed rule potentially affects operators and holders of Federal oil and gas leases, as well as right- of-way holders, on the OCS. This includes an estimated 99 businesses with active operations. Businesses that operate under this rule fall under the SBA's North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes 211111 (Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction) and 213111 (Drilling Oil and Gas Wells). For these NAICS classifications, a small business is defined as one with fewer than 1,251 employees (for NAICS 211111) and fewer than 1,001 (for NAICS 213111). Based on these criteria, 54 of the potentially impacted businesses are considered small and 45 are considered large businesses. BSEE considers that a rule has an impact on a ``substantial number of small entities'' when the total number of small entities impacted by the rule is equal to or exceeds 10 percent of the relevant universe of impacted entities. Approximately 55% of the businesses that would be affected by this rule are considered small; therefore, BSEE has determined that this rule would impact a substantial number of small businesses under the RFA. BSEE's analysis estimates the incremental costs for small operators, lease holders, and right-of-way holders in the offshore oil and natural gas industry. Costs already incurred as a result of existing fees were not considered as costs of this proposed rule because they are part of the baseline. Among the 54 small businesses involved in offshore operations, the average annual corporate sales volume, from the latest available data, for the year 2014, is $186 million, which is approximately $192 million in 2016 dollars. The following ``Change in Cost per Small Entity'' table provides an analysis and derivation of the estimated average cost, per small firm, that would be incurred per year as a result of the proposed rule. The first column of the table displays the list of services provided, as they appeared earlier in the Service Fee Table. The second column displays an estimate of the total counts of these services expected over the three fiscal year period 2016-2018. The third and fourth columns show the existing fee, and the proposed fee, respectively, for each service provided. The fifth column then displays, for each service, the expected change in total costs over the three-year period, on the basis of the data in the previous columns (the change in fees and the counts of services). The sixth column reflects the estimated proportion of the change in cost per small firm based on BSEE's data regarding counts of services across firms from FY 2013 to FY 2015. Finally, the seventh column reflects the estimated change in cost per small firm per fiscal year, by taking the annualized product of columns five and six. The estimated additional costs of the proposed rule from service fee changes totals approximately $8,875 per small firm per year, or an estimated 0.0046 percent of an average small business's sales. Change in Cost per Small Entity by Proposed Rule Provision \1\ [Negatives in parentheses] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated (Est.) total Change in Est. counts for all Existing fee Proposed fee total cost for proportion of Est. change in Service provided operators in per incidence per incidence all firms in cost per small cost per small FY 2016- FY FY 2016- FY firm firm, per FY 2018 2018 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Suspension of Operations/Suspension of Production (SOO/ 468 $2,123 $3,055 $436,176 0.0085 $1,235 SOP) Request........................................... 2a Deepwater Operations Plan--Simple.................... 19 3,599 14,290 203,129 0.0074 502 2b Deepwater Operations Plan--Complex................... 11 3,599 70,333 734,074 0.0074 1,813 3 Application for Permit to Drill (APD; Form BSEE-0123). 244 2,113 10,420 2,026,908 0.0082 5,544 4 Application for Permit to Modify (APM; Form BSEE-0124) 540 125 1,680 839,700 0.0094 2,622 5 New Facility Production Safety System Application for 3 5,426 3,976 (4,350) 0.0085 (12) facility with more than 125 components................. Pre-Production inspection Facility Offshore............ 3 14,280 13,534 (2,238) 0.0085 (6) Pre-Production inspection Facility in a Shipyard....... 3 7,426 14,567 21,423 0.0085 61 6 New Facility Production Safety System Application for 12 1,314 548 (9,192) 0.0085 (26) facility with 25-125 components........................ Pre-Production inspection Facility Offshore............ 3 8,967 8,508 (1,377) 0.0085 (4) Pre-Production inspection Facility in a Shipyard....... 3 5,141 9,818 14,031 0.0085 40 [[Page 81041]] 7 New Facility Production Safety System Application for 29 652 463 (5,481) 0.0085 (15) facility with fewer than 25 components................. Pre-Production inspection Facility Offshore............ 3 .............. 4,338 13,014 0.0085 37 Pre-Production inspection Facility in a Shipyard....... 3 .............. 1,967 5,901 0.0085 17 8 Production Safety System Application--Modification 404 605 1,278 271,892 0.0085 768 with more than 125 components reviewed................. Pre-Production inspection Facility Offshore............ 3 .............. 9,313 27,939 0.0085 79 Pre-Production inspection Facility in a Shipyard....... 3 .............. 8,100 24,300 0.0085 69 9 Production Safety System Application--Modification 1,424 217 439 316,128 0.0085 893 with 25-125 components reviewed........................ Pre-Production inspection Facility Offshore............ 3 .............. 6,765 20,295 0.0085 57 Pre-Production inspection Facility in a Shipyard....... 3 .............. 7,326 21,978 0.0085 62 10 Production Safety System Application--Modification 880 92 386 258,720 0.0085 731 with fewer than 25 components reviewed................. Pre-Production inspection Facility Offshore............ 3 .............. 4,513 13,539 0.0085 38 Pre-Production inspection Facility in a Shipyard....... 3 .............. 2,141 6,423 0.0085 18 11 Platform Application--Installation--Under the 5 22,734 28,311 27,885 0.0111 103 Platform Verification Program.......................... 12 Platform Application--Installation--Fixed Structure 27 3,256 1,914 (36,234) 0.0106 (128) Under the Platform Approval Program.................... 13 Platform Application--Installation--Caisson/Well 41 1,657 1,914 10,537 0.0126 44 Protector.............................................. 14 Platform Application--Modification/Repair............ 108 3,884 1,975 (206,172) 0.0075 (514) 15a New Pipeline Application (Lease Term)--Shallow water 12 3,541 1,584 (23,484) 0.0038 (30) (less than 1000 ft.)................................... 15b New Pipeline Application (Lease Term)--Deepwater 369 3,541 3,663 45,018 0.0038 58 (greater than 1000 ft.)................................ 16a Pipeline Application--Modification (Lease Term)-- 361 2,056 651 (507,205) 0.0040 (673) Minor.................................................. 16b Pipeline Application--Modification (Lease Term)-- 11 2,056 1,696 (3,960) 0.0040 (5) Major.................................................. 17a Pipeline Application--Modification (ROW)--Minor..... 631 4,169 455 (2,343,534) 0.0083 (6,462) 17b Pipeline Application--Modification (ROW)--Major..... 21 4,169 1,800 (49,749) 0.0083 (137) 18 Pipeline Repair Notification......................... 397 388 557 67,093 0.0081 181 19a Pipeline ROW Grant Application--Shallow water (less 121 2,771 1,662 (134,189) 0.0092 (409) than 1000 ft.)......................................... 19b Pipeline ROW Grant Application--Deepwater (greater 77 2,771 3,796 78,925 0.0092 241 than 1000 ft.)......................................... 20 Pipeline Conversion of Lease Term to ROW............. 35 236 494 9,030 0.0116 35 21 Pipeline ROW Assignment.............................. 800 201 397 156,800 0.0092 478 22 500 Feet From Lease/Unit Line Production Request..... 69 3,892 5,440 106,812 0.0093 330 23 Gas Cap Production Request........................... 87 4,953 11,962 609,783 0.0035 709 24 Downhole Commingling Request......................... 138 5,779 14,064 1,143,330 0.0048 1,828 25 Complex Surface Commingling and Measurement 164 4,056 8,205 680,436 0.0082 1,863 Application............................................ [[Page 81042]] 26 Simple Surface Commingling and Measurement 251 1,371 3,514 537,893 0.0082 1,473 Application............................................ 27 Voluntary Unitization Proposal or Unit Expansion..... 50 12,619 27,288 733,450 0.0021 522 28a Unitization Revision--Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and 154 896 1,683 121,198 0.0076 309 Successor Unit Operator/Suboperator.................... 28b Unitization Revision--Exhibit C..................... 21 896 3,255 49,539 0.0076 126 29 Application to Remove a Platform or Other Facility... 687 4,684 2,846 (1,262,706) 0.0089 (3,729) 30 Application to Decommission a Pipeline (Lease Term).. 707 1,142 857 (201,495) 0.0050 (333) 31 Application to Decommission a Pipeline (ROW)......... 503 2,170 980 (598,570) 0.0077 (1,526) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total \2\........................................... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 8,874 As a Percent of the Average Sales Revenue of .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 0.0046 Small Firms ($192 million)..................... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Estimated dollar amounts are in 2016 dollars. \2\ Numbers may not add up due to rounding. BSEE has concluded the additional costs of the proposed rule would impose an insignificant, negligible burden on small entities. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act The proposed rule is not a major rule under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This proposed rule: (a) Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (b) Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; and (c) Would not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The requirements would apply to all entities operating on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) regardless of company designation as a small business. For more information on costs affecting small businesses, see the Regulatory Flexibility Act portion of this document. Your comments are important. The Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were established to receive comments from small businesses about federal agency enforcement actions. The Ombudsman will annually evaluate the enforcement activities and rate each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on the actions of BSEE, call 1-888- 734-3247. You may comment to the SBA without fear of retaliation. Allegations of discrimination/retaliation filed with the SBA will be investigated for appropriate action. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This proposed rule would not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The proposed rule would not have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, a statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., is not required. Takings Implication Assessment (E.O. 12630) Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this proposed rule does not have significant takings implications. The proposed rule is not a governmental action capable of interference with constitutionally protected property rights. Therefore, a Takings Implication Assessment is not required. Federalism (E.O. 13132) Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this proposed rule does not have federalism implications. This proposed rule would not substantially and directly affect the relationship between the Federal and State governments. To the extent that State and local governments have a role in OCS activities, this proposed rule would not affect that role. A federalism assessment is not required. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) This proposed rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988. Specifically, this proposed rule: (1) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (2) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal standards. Consultation With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175) Under the criteria in E.O. 13175 and the Department's tribal consultation policy, we have evaluated this proposed rule and have determined that it has no substantial direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes, or on the relationship or distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, and that consultation under the Department's tribal consultation policy is not required. [[Page 81043]] Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 This proposed rule contains a collection of information that will be submitted to OMB for review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, BSEE invites the public and other Federal agencies to comment on any aspect of the non-hour cost burden. If you wish to comment on the information collection (IC) aspects of this proposed rule, you may send your comments directly to OMB and send a copy of your comments to the Regulations and Standards Branch (see the ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule). Please reference Adjustments to Cost Recovery Fees Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas, and Sulfur Activities on the Outer Continental Shelf, 1014--NEW, in your comments. BSEE specifically requests comments concerning: The need for the information, its practical utility, the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate, and ways to minimize the burden. You may obtain a copy of the supporting statement for the new collection of information by contacting the Bureau's Information Collection Clearance Officer at (703) 787-1607. To see a copy of the entire IC request (ICR) submitted to OMB, go to http://www.reginfo.gov (select Information Collection Review, Currently Under Review). The PRA provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information contained in these proposed regulations 30 to 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it by December 19, 2016. The title of the collection of information for this rule is 30 CFR part 250, Adjustments to Cost Recovery Fees. The proposed regulations pertain to BSEE updating its 31 cost recovery fees, including additional fees for site visits if deemed necessary. These proposed changes are designed to recover the full cost BSEE incurs for providing these services. Potential respondents comprise Federal OCS oil, gas, and sulfur operators and lessees, as well as pipeline ROW holders. Responses to this collection of information are required to obtain or retain a benefit and are mandatory. The frequency of response varies depending upon the requirement. The IC does not include questions of a sensitive nature. BSEE will protect proprietary information according to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and DOI's implementing regulations (43 CFR part 2), 30 CFR 250.197, Data and information to be made available to the public or for limited inspection, and 30 CFR part 252, OCS Oil and Gas Information Program. OMB approved the IC burden of the existing 30 CFR part 250 regulations under Control Numbers 1014-0022, Subpart A (84,391 hour burden, $1,371,458 non-hour cost burden; expiration 8/31/17); 1014- 0024, Subpart B ($39,589 non-hour cost burden; expiration 11/30/2018); 1014-0025 Applications for Permit to Drill ($862,104 non-hour cost burden, expiration 4/30/2017); 1014-0026, Applications for Permit to Modify ($361,625 non-hour cost burden, expiration 5/31/2017); 1014- 0003, Subpart H ($323,481 non-hour cost burden; expiration 12/31/2017); 1014-0011, Subpart I, ($392,874 non-hour cost burden, expiration 5/31/ 2017); 1014-0016, Subpart J ($1,508,968 non-hour cost burden, expiration 8/31/2018); 1014-0019, Subpart K ($1,361,176 non-hour cost burden, expiration 1/31/2019); 1014-0002, Subpart L ($322,479 non-hour cost burden, expiration 10/31/16); 1014-0015, Subpart M ($138,188 non- hour cost burden, expiration 12/31/2017); and 1014-0010, Subpart Q ($1,686,396 non-hour cost burden, expiration 10/31/2016), respectively. If this proposed rule is finalized and codified, the various non- hour cost burdens and one new hour burden will be removed from this collection of information and consolidated with their primary information collection burden under their respective OMB Control Numbers. Hour burdens are included in the regulatory requirements of various OMB-approved ICRs, of which only one is changing and discussed in this ICR. Hour Burden Table ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reporting and Citation 30 CFR 250 recordkeeping Hour burden Average number of Annual burden requirements annual responses hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subpart A ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 125; 126; 292; 1000; 1015; 1303 Cost recovery fees, Cost Recovery Fees and related items 0. applications, are covered individually throughout confirmation Part 250 receipts, etc., verbal approvals pertaining to fees. -------------------------------------- 125(c)......................... Request refund, 3 min............ 200 requests..... 10. including a reason for the refund, within 150 days of the initial payment. Total...................... ...................... ................. 200 responses.... 10 hours. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BSEE currently receives approximately $7,000,000 in cost recovery fees (non-hour cost burdens) annually. This proposed rulemaking would increase that total by approximately $9,000,000 for a total of $16,000,000 in cost recovery fees. The following table provides a breakdown of the non-hour cost burdens for this proposed rulemaking. [Existing non-hour cost burden/cost recovery fees are in regular font; proposed non-hour cost burden/cost recovery fees and text are in italic font; new fees are in bold font] [[Page 81044]] Non-Hour Cost Burden Table ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Service/cost Non-hour cost Citation 30 CFR part 250 recovery fee burdens ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 171(e)...................... Suspension of $2,123 x 646 Operations and/or requests = Suspension of $1,371,458. Production (SOO/ $3,055 x 646 SOP) Request. requests = $1,973,530. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart B ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 292(q)...................... Deepwater Operations $3,599 x 11 plans = Plan [simple and $39,589. complex]. $14,290 x 7 simple DWOPs = $100,030. $70,333 x 4 complex DWOPs = $281,332. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Applications for Permit to Drill ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 410(d); 513(b); 1617(a)..... Application for $2,113 x 408 Permit to Drill applications = [initial permit]. $862,104. $10,420 x 408 applications = $4,251,360. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Application for Permit to Modify ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 465(b); 513(b); 613(b); Application for $125 x 2,893 1618(a); 1704(g). Permit to Modify applications = [initial permit]. $361,625. $1,680 x 2,893 applications = $4,860,240. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart H ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 842......................... New Facility $5,426 x 1 Production Safety application = System Application $5,426. for facility with $3,976 x 1 more than 125 application = components. $3,976. Pre-production $14,280 x 1 offshore Inspection--offshor = $14,280. e. $13,534 x 1 offshore = $13,534. Pre-production $7,426 x 1 shipyard Inspection--shipyar = $7,426. d. $14,567 x 1 shipyard = $14,567. 842......................... New Facility $1,314 x 4 Production Safety applications = System Application $5,256. for facility with $548 x 4 25-125 components. applications = $2,192. Pre-production $8,967 x 1 offshore Inspection--offshor visit = $8,967. e. $8,508 x 1 offshore visit = $8,508. Pre-production $5,141 x 1 shipyard Inspection--shipyar = $5,141. d. $9,818 x 1 shipyard = $9,818. 842......................... New Facility $652 x 10 Production Safety applications = System Application $6,520. for facility with $463 x 10 fewer than 25 applications = components. $4,630. Pre-production $4,338 x 1 offshore Inspection--offshor visit = $4,338. e. Pre-production $1,967 x 1 shipyard Inspection--shipyar = $1,967. d. 842......................... Production Safety $605 x 174 System Application-- applications = Modification with $105,270. more than 125 $1,278 x 174 components reviewed. applications = $222,372. Pre-production $9,313 x 1 shipyard Inspection--offshor visit = $9,313. e. Pre-production $8,100 x 1 shipyard Inspection--shipyar visit = $8,100. d. 842......................... Production Safety $217 x 615 System Application-- applications = Modification with $133,455. 25-125 components $439 x 615 reviewed. applications = $269,985. Pre-production $6,765 x 1 offshore Inspection--offshor = $6,765. e. Pre-production $7,326 x 1 shipyard Inspection--shipyar = $7,326. d. 842......................... Production Safety $92 x 345 System Application-- applications = Modification with $31,740. fewer than 25 $386 x 345 components reviewed. applications = $133,170. Pre-production $4,513 x 1 offshore Inspection--offshor = $4,513. e. Pre-production $2,141 x 1 shipyard Inspection--shipyar = $2,141. d. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 905(l)...................... Platform $22,734 x 3= Application--Instal $68,202. lation--Under the $28,311 x 3 = Platform $84,933. Verification Program. 905(l)...................... Platform $3,256 x 12 = Application--Instal $39,072. lation--Fixed $1,914 x 12 = Structure Under the $22,968. Platform Approval Program. 905(l)...................... Platform $1,657 x 20 = Application--Instal $33,140. lation--Caisson/ $1,914 x 20 = Well Protector. $38,280. 905(1)...................... Platform $3,884 x 65 Application--Modifi applications = cation/Repair. $252,460. $1,975 x 65 applications = $128,375. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart J ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1000(b)..................... Submit application $3,541 x 61 L/T P/L and all required applications = information and $216,001. notices to install new lease term pipeline (L/T P/L).. Submit application $1,584 x 2 and all required applications = information and $3,168. notices to modify a L/T P/L--Shallow Water (less than 1,000 ft.). Submit application $3,663 x 59 and all required applications = information and $216,117. notices to modify a L/T P/L--Deepwater (greater than 1,000 ft.). [[Page 81045]] 1000(b)..................... Submit application $2,056 x 102 L/T P/L and all required applications = information and $209,712. notices to modify a L/T P/L. Submit application $651 x 99 minor and all required modifications = information and $64,449. notices to modify a L/T P/L--Minor. Submit application $1,696 x 3 major and all required modifications = information and $5,088. notices to modify a L/T P/L--Major. 1000(b)..................... Pipeline Application $4,169 x 190 Modification (ROW). applications = $792,110. Pipeline Application $455 x 184 minor Modification (ROW)-- applications = Minor. $83,720. Pipeline Application $1,800 x 6 major Modification (ROW)-- applications = Major. $10,800. 1008(e)..................... Pipeline Repair $388 x 156 = Notification. $60,528. Pipeline Repair $557 x 156 Notification. notifications = $86,892. 1015(a)..................... Pipeline ROW Grant $2,771 x 62 Application. applications = $171,802. Pipeline ROW Grant $1,662 x 38 ROWs in Application--Shallo shallow water = w Water (less than $63,156. 1,000 ft.). Pipeline ROW Grant $3,796 x 24 ROWs in Application--Deepwa Deepwater = ter (greater than $91,104. 1,000 ft.). 1015(a)..................... Pipeline Conversion $236 x 15 of Lease Term to applications = ROW. $3,540. $494 x 15 applications = $7,410. 1018(b)..................... Pipeline ROW $201 x 275 P/L ROW Assignment. requests = $55,275. $397 x 275 P/L ROW requests = $109,175. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart K ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1156(a)..................... 500 Feet From Lease/ $3,892 x 20 requests Unit Line = $77,840. Production Request. $5,440 x 20 requests = $108,800. 1157........................ Gas Cap Production $4,953 x 22 requests Request. = $108,966. $11,962 x 22 requests = $263,164. 1158(a)..................... Downhole Commingling $5,779 x 30 requests Request. = $173,370. $14,064 x 30 requests = $421,920. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart L ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1202(a); 1203(b); 1204(a)... Complex Surface $4,056 x 67 Commingling and applications = Measurement $271,752. Application. $8,205 x 67 applications = $549,735. 1202(a); 1203(b); 1204(a)... Simple Surface $1,371 x 37 Commingling and applications = Measurement $50,727. Application. $3,514 x 37 applications = $130,018. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart M ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1303(d)..................... Voluntary $12,619 x 8 requests Unitization = $100,952. Proposal or Unit Expansion. $27,288 x 8 requests =$218,304. Unitization Revision $896 x 41 revisions = $36,736. Unitization $1,683 x 36 Exhibit Revision--Exhibit A/B = $60,588. A, Exhibit B, and Successor Unit Operator/Sub- operator. Unitization $3,255 x 5 Exhibit C Revision--Exhibit C. = $16,275. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subpart Q ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1727........................ Application to $4,684 x 240 Remove a Platform applications = or Other Facility. $1,124,160. $2,846 x 240 applications = $683,040. 1751(a); 1752(a)............ Application to $1,142 x 213 Decommission a applications = Pipeline (Lease $243,246. Term). $857 x 213 applications = $182,541. 1751(a); 1752(a)............ Application to $2,170 x 147 Decommission a applications = Pipeline (ROW). $318,990. $980 x 147 applications = $144,060. NEW NON-HOUR COST BURDEN.... .................... $44,463. REVISED NON-HOUR COST BURDEN .................... $15,943,324. ------------------------------------------- TOTAL NEW and Revised .................... $15,987,787. Non-Hour Cost Burdens. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Although the total new and revised Non-Hour Cost Burdens are estimated to be $16 million based on 3-year averages of the number of plans, applications, and permits, due to recent declines in the number of these submissions, BSEE anticipates that collections will more closely approximate $11 million in FY 2018. For further information on this non-hour burden estimation process, refer to 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(1) and (2), or contact the BSEE Information Collection Clearance Officer at (703) 787-1607. [[Page 81046]] National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 This proposed rule meets the criteria set forth in 516 Departmental Manual (DM) 15.4C(1) for a categorical exclusion because it involves modification of existing regulations, the impacts of which would be limited to administrative or economic effects with minimal environmental impacts. BSEE also analyzed this proposed rule to determine if extraordinary circumstances, set forth in 43 CFR 46.215, exist that would require BSEE to prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement for actions otherwise eligible for a categorical exclusion. BSEE concluded that this proposed rule does not trigger any of the criteria for extraordinary circumstances and, therefore, has not prepared an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement. Data Quality Act In developing this proposed rule, we did not conduct or use a study, experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Data Quality Act (Pub. L. 106-554 Sec. 515). Effects on the Nation's Energy Supply (E.O. 13211) This proposed rule is not a significant energy action under the definition in E.O. 13211 because: --It is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866; --It is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy; and --It has not been designated as a significant energy action by the Administrator of OIRA. Clarity of This Regulation We are required by E.O. 12866, E.O. 12988, E.O. 13563, and by the Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means that each rule we publish must: --Be logically organized; --Use the active voice to address readers directly; --Use clear language rather than jargon; --Be divided into short sections and sentences; and --Use lists and tables wherever possible. If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc. List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 250 Administrative practice and procedure, Continental Shelf, Environmental impact statements, Environmental protection, Government contracts, Investigations, Oil and gas exploration, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur. Dated: October 31, 2016. Amanda C. Leiter, Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) proposes to amend 30 CFR part 250 as follows: PART 250--OIL AND GAS AND SULFUR OPERATIONS IN THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF 0 1. Authority citation for part 250 continues to read as follow: Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1751; 31 U.S.C. 9701, 33 U.S.C. 1321(j)(1)(C), 43 U.S.C. 1334. 0 2. Revise Sec. 250.125 by: 0 a. Revising the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows; 0 b. Redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (d); 0 c. Removing paragraph (b) and adding new paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: Sec. 250.125 Service fees. (a) * * * Service Fee Table ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Service--processing of the following: Fee amount 30 CFR citation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Suspension of Operations/ $3,055........................... Sec. 250.171(e). Suspension of Production (SOO/SOP) Request. (2) Deepwater Operations Plan: (i) Deepwater Operations Plan-- $14,290.......................... Sec. 250.292(q). Simple. (ii) Deepwater Operations Plan-- $70,333.......................... Complex (New Technology). (3) Application for Permit to Drill $10,420.......................... Sec. 250.410(d); Sec. 250.513(b); (APD; Form BSEE-0123). Sec. 250.1617(a). (4) Application for Permit to $1,680........................... Sec. 250.465(b); Sec. 250.513(b); Modify (APM; Form BSEE-0124). Sec. 250.613(b); Sec. 250.1618(a); Sec. 250.1704(g). (5) New Facility Production Safety $3,976 $13,534 additional fee System Application for Facility will be charged if BSEE conducts with More than 125 Components. a pre-production inspection of a facility offshore, and $14,567 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. A component is a piece of equipment or an ancillary system that is protected by one or more of the safety devices required by API RP 14C (as incorporated by reference in Sec. 250.198). (6) New Facility Production Safety $548 $8,508 additional fee will Sec. 250.842. System Application for Facility be charged if BSEE conducts a with 25-125 Components. pre-production inspection of a facility offshore, and $9,818 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (7) New Facility Production Safety $463 $4,338 additional fee will Sec. 250.842. System Application for Facility be charged if BSEE conducts a with Fewer than 25 Components. pre-production inspection of a facility offshore, and $1,967 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. [[Page 81047]] (8) Production Safety System $1,278 $9,313 additional fee will Sec. 250.842. Application--Modification with be charged if BSEE conducts a More than 125 Components Reviewed. pre-production inspection of a facility offshore, and $8,100 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (9) Production Safety System $439 $6,765 additional fee will Sec. 250.842. Application--Modification with 25- be charged if BSEE conducts a 125 Components Reviewed. pre-production inspection of a facility offshore, and $7,326 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (10) Production Safety System $386 $4,513 additional fee will Sec. 250.842. Application--Modification with be charged if BSEE conducts a Fewer than 25 Components Reviewed. pre-production inspection of a facility offshore, and $2,141 for an inspection of a facility while in a shipyard. (11) Platform Application-- $28,311.......................... Sec. 250.905(l). Installation--Under the Platform Verification Program. (12) Platform Application-- $1,914........................... Sec. 250.905(l). Installation--Fixed Structure Under the Platform Approval Program. (13) Platform Application-- $1,914........................... Sec. 250.905(l). Installation--Caisson/Well Protector. (14) Platform Application-- $1,975........................... Sec. 250.905(l). Modification/Repair. (15) New Pipeline Application (Lease Term): (i) New Pipeline Application $1,584........................... Sec. 250.1000(b). (Lease Term)--Shallow Water (less than 1,000 ft.). (ii) New Pipeline Application $3,663 (Lease Term)--Deepwater (greater than 1,000 ft.). (16) Pipeline Application-- Modification (Lease Term): (i) Pipeline Application-- $651............................. Sec. 250.1000(b). Modification (Lease Term)-- Minor. (ii) Pipeline Application-- $1,696 Modification (Lease Term)-- Major. (17) Pipeline Application-- Modification Right-of-Way (ROW): (i) Pipeline Application-- $455............................. Sec. 250.1000(b). Modification (ROW)--Minor. (ii) Pipeline Application-- $1,800 Modification (ROW)--Major. (18) Pipeline Repair Notification.. $557............................. Sec. 250.1008(e). (19) Pipeline ROW Grant Application: (i) Pipeline ROW Grant $1,662........................... Sec. 250.1015(a). Application--Shallow Water (less than 1,000 ft.). (ii) Pipeline ROW Grant $3,796 Application--Deepwater (greater than 1,000 ft.). (20) Pipeline Conversion of Lease $494............................. Sec. 250.1015(a). Term to ROW. (21) Pipeline ROW Assignment....... $397............................. Sec. 250.1018(b). (22) 500 Feet From Lease/Unit Line $5,440........................... Sec. 250.1156(a). Production Request. (23) Gas Cap Production Request.... $11,962.......................... Sec. 250.1157. (24) Downhole Commingling Request.. $14,064.......................... Sec. 250.1158(a). (25) Complex Surface Commingling $8,205........................... Sec. 250.1202(a); Sec. 250.1203(b); and Measurement Application. Sec. 250.1204(a). (26) Simple Surface Commingling and $3,514........................... Sec. 250.1202(a); Sec. 250.1203(b); Measurement Application. Sec. 250.1204(a). (27) Voluntary Unitization Proposal $27,288.......................... Sec. 250.1303(d). or Unit Expansion. (28) Unitization Revision: (i) Unitization Revision-- $1,683........................... Sec. 250.1303(d). Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and Successor Unit Operator/Sub- operator. (ii) Unitization Revision-- $3,225........................... Exhibit C. (29) Application to Remove a $2,846........................... Sec. 250.1727. Platform or Other Facility. (30) Application to Decommission a $857............................. Sec. 250.1751(a) or Sec. Pipeline (Lease Term). 250.1752(a). (31) Application to Decommission a $980............................. Sec. 250.1751(a) or Sec. Pipeline (ROW). 250.1752(a). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (b) Fees specified in paragraph (a) must be paid electronically using one of the methods required by Sec. 250.126. Proof of payment of the fees listed in paragraph (a) must accompany the submission of the application or other request for service. Once a fee is paid, it is nonrefundable, except as provided in paragraph (c). If your application is returned to you as incomplete, you are not required to submit a new fee with the amended application. [[Page 81048]] (c) BSEE will issue a refund in certain situations. (1) You are eligible for a refund if you submit: (i) More than one payment with a single request; (ii) An incorrect fee or fee amount; or (iii) A payment without submitting any application or other request and the matter does not proceed further. (2) If you meet the criteria for a refund, you must submit a completed Refund Request form, which can be found at http://www.bsee.gov/About-BSEE/Fees-for-Services/. On the Refund Request form, in the ``*Memo (reason requesting refund)'' section, you must list the reason for the refund. You must use the information from your original proof of payment to prepare your refund request. (3) You must submit all refund requests to BSEE within 150 days of the initial service fee payment. If you do not submit your request within the 150-day timeframe, BSEE will not issue a refund. (4) If you have any questions pertaining to refund eligibility or to the preparation of the refund request, contact the appropriate Regional Office. * * * * * 0 3. Revise Sec. 250.126 to read as follows: Sec. 250.126 Electronic payment instructions. (a) You must file all payments under any provision of this part electronically, as provided in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section. (1) If you submit an application through the eWell Web site at https://ewell.bsee.gov/ewell/, you must use the interactive payment feature in that system, which directs you through pay.gov to make a payment. A copy of your pay.gov payment confirmation or pay.gov receipt serves as proof of your payment. (2) For applications not submitted through eWell, you may make a payment through the Fees for Services page on the BSEE Web site at http://www.bsee.gov/About-BSEE/Fees-for-Services/ or directly through the pay.gov Web site. A copy of your pay.gov payment confirmation or pay.gov receipt serves as proof of your payment and must accompany the submission of the application or other request for service. (b) Payments at or below the current U.S. Treasury credit card limit may be made using a credit card or through the automated clearing house (ACH-debit). Payments above the current U.S. Treasury credit card limit must be made through ACH-debit. (c) BSEE does not accept wire transfer electronic payments. 0 4. In Sec. 250.292, revise paragraph (q) to read as follows: Sec. 250.292 What must the DWOP contain? * * * * * (q) Payment of the service fee listed in Sec. 250.125. The service fee is divided into two levels based on the complexity of the plan, as shown in the following table. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Application type Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Complex plans................. Plans containing: i. ``new or unusual technology'' as defined by Sec. 250.200 and such technology: A. requires a high degree of specialized knowledge; B. exceeds the limits of existing engineering standards; C. conflicts with existing engineering standards; or D. warrants an additional level of review due to the risk associated with implementation. ii. installation of a new floating production facility. (2) Simple plans.................. All other plans. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 5. Revise Sec. 250.1000 by: 0 a. Redesignating paragraphs (c) through (e) as paragraphs (e) through (g); and 0 b. Adding new paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows: Sec. 250.1000 General requirements * * * * * (c) The service fee for a New Pipeline Application (Lease Term) is divided into two levels based on water depth, as shown in the following table: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Application type Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Shallow water applications.... Applications for new lease term pipelines that will be located in their entirety within water depths of 1,000 feet or less. (2) Deepwater applications........ Applications for new lease term pipelines, any portion of which will be located in water depths greater than 1,000 feet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (d) The service fee for a Pipeline Application--Modification (Lease Term) and a Pipeline Application--Modification (Right-of-way) are divided into two levels based on complexity, as shown in the following table: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Application type Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Major Applications............ Applications containing a route modification. (2) Minor Applications............ All other applications. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * 0 6. In Sec. 250.1015, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows: Sec. 250.1015 Applications for pipeline right-of-way grants (a) You must submit to the Regional Supervisor an original and three copies of an application for a new or modified pipeline ROW grant. The application must address those items required by Sec. Sec. 250.1007(a) or (b) of this subpart, as applicable. It must also state the primary purpose for which you will use the ROW grant. If the ROW has been used before the application is made, the application must state the date such use began, by whom, and the date the applicant obtained control of the ROW. When you file your application, you must pay the rental required under Sec. 250.1012 of this subpart, as well as the [[Page 81049]] service fees listed in Sec. 250.125 of this part for a pipeline ROW grant to install a new pipeline, or to convert an existing lease term pipeline into an ROW pipeline. An application to modify an approved ROW grant must be accompanied by the additional rental required under Sec. 250.1012, if applicable. You must file a separate application for each ROW. The service fee for a pipeline ROW grant application is divided into two levels based on water depth, as shown in the following table: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Application type Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Shallow water applications.... Applications for a pipeline ROW grant for pipelines that will be located in their entirety within water depths of 1,000 feet or less. (2) Deepwater applications........ Applications for a pipeline ROW grant for pipelines, any portion of which will be located in water depths greater than 1,000 feet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * 0 7. In Sec. 250.1303, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows: Sec. 250.1303 How do I apply for voluntary unitization? * * * * * (d) You must pay the service fee listed in Sec. 250.125 of this part with your request for a voluntary unitization proposal or the expansion of a previously approved voluntary unit to include additional acreage. Additionally, you must pay the service fee listed in Sec. 250.125 with your request for unitization revision. The service fee for a request for unitization revision is divided into two levels, as shown in the following table: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Application type Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Exhibits A and B.............. Applications for revisions to Exhibit A and/or Exhibit B or designation of Successor Unit Operators and/or Successor Unit Sub- operators. (2) Exhibit C..................... Applications for revisions to Exhibit C. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [FR Doc. 2016-27500 Filed 11-16-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-VH-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 81033
Alternative Name/Name message. See also Public Availability of U.S.C. 9701 and the Office of
Comments under Procedural Matters. Management and Budget (OMB)
Geneva Red 7—Geneva Red • Submit comments electronically. Go Circular A–25,1 BSEE is required to
Madeline Angevine—Madeleine to http://www.regulations.gov and assess a charge against each identifiable
Angevine search for ‘‘BSEE–2016–0003.’’ Follow non-Federal recipient of special benefits
the instructions to submit public derived from BSEE services beyond
Signed: September 29, 2016. comments and view supporting and those received by the public at large.
John J. Manfreda, related materials available for this The charge BSEE assesses is legally
Administrator. rulemaking. BSEE will post all relevant sufficient if it recovers BSEE’s full cost
Approved: November 3, 2016. comments. to provide the service.
Timothy E. Skud, • Mail or hand-carry comments to the OMB Circular A–25 requires a Federal
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Department of the Interior (DOI); Bureau agency to conduct a biennial review of
Tariff Policy). of Safety and Environmental its user charges to determine whether
[FR Doc. 2016–27573 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am]
Enforcement; Attention: Regulations adjustments are necessary and to review
and Standards Branch; 45600 Woodland other agency programs to determine
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
Road, Sterling, VA 20166. Please whether new fees should be established
reference Adjustment of Service Fees for any services it provides. BSEE
Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas, reviewed its 31 services and pre-
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and Sulfur Activities on the Outer production site visits along with the
Continental Shelf, AA31 in your associated cost recovery fees to
Bureau of Safety and Environmental determine whether the cost of providing
comments and include your name and
Enforcement each of the services supports the
return address.
• Comments on the information existing fee structure in the existing
30 CFR Part 250 collection contained in this proposed regulations. BSEE’s methodology for
[Docket ID: BSEE–2016–0003; 17XE1700DX rule are separate from those on the calculating its direct and indirect costs
EEEE500000 EX1SF0000.DAQ000] substance of the proposed rule. Send to perform the 31 services and the pre-
comments on the information collection production site visits is found later in
RIN 1014–AA31 burden in this rule to: OMB, Interior this document. Results from the direct
Desk Officer, 202–395–5806 (fax); email and indirect cost calculations indicate
Adjustments to Cost Recovery Fees
OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov. Please that 17 fees should be increased, eight
Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas,
also send a copy to BSEE at fees reduced, and six fees subdivided
and Sulfur Activities on the Outer
regs@bsee.gov, fax number (703) 787– into two tiers by complexity, with six of
Continental Shelf
1546, or by the address listed above. the subdivided fees increasing above the
AGENCY: Bureau of Safety and • Public Availability of Comments— existing undivided fee, and six
Environmental Enforcement, Interior. Before including your address, phone decreasing. The results also indicate
ACTION: Proposed rule.
number, email address, or other that the existing pre-production site
personal identifying information in your visit fees for two of the facility
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Safety and comment, you should be aware that production safety system applications
Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) your entire comment—including your should be decreased for visits to
currently charges a fee for 31 different personal identifying information—may facilities offshore and increased for
services (hereafter ‘‘cost recovery fees’’) be made publicly available at any time. visits to facilities while in a shipyard.
it provides to non-Federal recipients. While you can ask us in your comment Finally, the results suggest that new pre-
The services were identified by BSEE’s to withhold your personal identifying production site visit fees should be
predecessor agency, the Minerals information from public review, we implemented for the four facility
Management Service (MMS). This cannot guarantee that we will be able to production safety system applications
proposed rule would revise and clarify do so. that did not previously include site visit
the existing fees; add new fees for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: fees. The details of these proposed fees
certain services; revise and codify the Kimberly Monaco, Budget Analyst, are shown in the Service Fee Table later
existing conditions for refunding fees; Office of Budget at (703) 787–1658, in this document.
and clarify the acceptable methods of Kimberly.Monaco@bsee.gov. The fees are codified in BSEE’s
fee payment. This proposed rule would regulations at 30 CFR 250.125(a). This
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
enable BSEE to recover its full costs proposed rule would: (1) Amend 31 of
associated with providing these services Table of Contents the cost recovery fees in existing
to recipients of special benefits beyond § 250.125; (2) establish two tiers of fees
I. Background within the Deepwater Operations Plans
those accruing to the general public.
A. BSEE Statutory and Regulatory (DWOPs), New Pipeline Applications,
DATES: BSEE will consider all comments Authority
received by January 17, 2017. BSEE may B. Summary of Existing Cost Recovery Fees
Pipeline Modification Applications for
not consider comments received after Regulations and Basis for Proposed both Lease Term and Right-of-way
this date. Submit comments to the Amendments (ROW) Pipelines, ROW Pipeline Grant
Office of Management and Budget C. Request for Comments on Potential Applications, and Unitization Revisions
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(OMB) on the information collection Future Fees fee categories; (3) add four new pre-
II. Procedural Matters production site visit cost recovery fees
burden in this proposed rule by
December 19, 2016. to the existing two pre-production site
I. Background visit fees to support the review and
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
A. BSEE Statutory and Regulatory approval, if necessary, of production
on the proposed rule by any of the
following methods. Please use the Authority
1 Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Regulatory Identifier Number (RIN) In accordance with the Independent Circular A–25 Revised, User Charges, July 8, 1993,
1014–AA31 as an identifier to your Offices Appropriation Act, 1952, 31 and Transmittal Memorandum 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_81255/page/1.svg)
![81040 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Act and 213111 (Drilling Oil and Gas Wells). The following ‘‘Change in Cost per
The DOI certifies that this proposed For these NAICS classifications, a small Small Entity’’ table provides an analysis
rule would not have a significant business is defined as one with fewer and derivation of the estimated average
economic effect on a substantial number than 1,251 employees (for NAICS cost, per small firm, that would be
of small entities under the Regulatory 211111) and fewer than 1,001 (for incurred per year as a result of the
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. NAICS 213111). Based on these criteria, proposed rule. The first column of the
(RFA). The RFA, at 5 U.S.C. 603, 54 of the potentially impacted table displays the list of services
requires agencies to prepare an initial businesses are considered small and 45 provided, as they appeared earlier in the
regulatory flexibility analysis to are considered large businesses. BSEE Service Fee Table. The second column
determine whether a regulation would considers that a rule has an impact on displays an estimate of the total counts
have a significant economic impact on a ‘‘substantial number of small entities’’ of these services expected over the three
a substantial number of small entities. when the total number of small entities fiscal year period 2016–2018. The third
Further, under the Small Business impacted by the rule is equal to or
and fourth columns show the existing
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of exceeds 10 percent of the relevant
fee, and the proposed fee, respectively,
1996, at section 212 of Public Law 104– universe of impacted entities.
Approximately 55% of the businesses for each service provided. The fifth
121 (March 29, 1996), an agency is column then displays, for each service,
required to produce compliance that would be affected by this rule are
considered small; therefore, BSEE has the expected change in total costs over
guidance for small entities if the rule
determined that this rule would impact the three-year period, on the basis of the
would have a significant economic
impact. a substantial number of small data in the previous columns (the
The Initial Regulatory Flexibility businesses under the RFA. change in fees and the counts of
Analysis prepared by BSEE assessed the BSEE’s analysis estimates the services). The sixth column reflects the
impact of this proposed rule on small incremental costs for small operators, estimated proportion of the change in
entities, as defined by the applicable lease holders, and right-of-way holders cost per small firm based on BSEE’s data
Small Business Administration (SBA) in the offshore oil and natural gas regarding counts of services across firms
size standards. BSEE has determined industry. Costs already incurred as a from FY 2013 to FY 2015. Finally, the
that this proposed rule potentially result of existing fees were not seventh column reflects the estimated
affects operators and holders of Federal considered as costs of this proposed rule change in cost per small firm per fiscal
oil and gas leases, as well as right-of- because they are part of the baseline. year, by taking the annualized product
way holders, on the OCS. This includes Among the 54 small businesses of columns five and six. The estimated
an estimated 99 businesses with active involved in offshore operations, the additional costs of the proposed rule
operations. Businesses that operate average annual corporate sales volume, from service fee changes totals
under this rule fall under the SBA’s from the latest available data, for the approximately $8,875 per small firm per
North American Industry Classification year 2014, is $186 million, which is year, or an estimated 0.0046 percent of
System (NAICS) codes 211111 (Crude approximately $192 million in 2016 an average small business’s sales.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction) dollars.
CHANGE IN COST PER SMALL ENTITY BY PROPOSED RULE PROVISION 1
[Negatives in parentheses]
Estimated Change in
(Est.) total Est.
Proposed fee total cost for Est. change in
counts for all Existing fee proportion
Service provided per all firms in cost per small
operators in per incidence of cost
incidence FY 2016– firm, per FY
FY 2016– per small firm
FY 2018
FY 2018
1 Suspension of Operations/Suspen-
sion of Production (SOO/SOP) Re-
quest ..................................................... 468 $2,123 $3,055 $436,176 0.0085 $1,235
2a Deepwater Operations Plan—Simple 19 3,599 14,290 203,129 0.0074 502
2b Deepwater Operations Plan—Com-
plex ....................................................... 11 3,599 70,333 734,074 0.0074 1,813
3 Application for Permit to Drill (APD;
Form BSEE–0123) ............................... 244 2,113 10,420 2,026,908 0.0082 5,544
4 Application for Permit to Modify
(APM; Form BSEE–0124) .................... 540 125 1,680 839,700 0.0094 2,622
5 New Facility Production Safety Sys-
tem Application for facility with more
than 125 components ........................... 3 5,426 3,976 (4,350) 0.0085 (12)
Pre-Production inspection Facility
Offshore ................................................ 3 14,280 13,534 (2,238) 0.0085 (6)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Pre-Production inspection Facility in
a Shipyard ............................................ 3 7,426 14,567 21,423 0.0085 61
6 New Facility Production Safety Sys-
tem Application for facility with 25–125
components .......................................... 12 1,314 548 (9,192) 0.0085 (26)
Pre-Production inspection Facility
Offshore ................................................ 3 8,967 8,508 (1,377) 0.0085 (4)
Pre-Production inspection Facility in
a Shipyard ............................................ 3 5,141 9,818 14,031 0.0085 40
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_81255/page/8.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 81041
CHANGE IN COST PER SMALL ENTITY BY PROPOSED RULE PROVISION 1—Continued
[Negatives in parentheses]
Estimated Change in
(Est.) total Est.
Proposed fee total cost for Est. change in
counts for all Existing fee proportion
Service provided per all firms in cost per small
operators in per incidence of cost
incidence FY 2016– firm, per FY
FY 2016– per small firm
FY 2018
FY 2018
7 New Facility Production Safety Sys-
tem Application for facility with fewer
than 25 components ............................. 29 652 463 (5,481) 0.0085 (15)
Pre-Production inspection Facility
Offshore ................................................ 3 ........................ 4,338 13,014 0.0085 37
Pre-Production inspection Facility in
a Shipyard ............................................ 3 ........................ 1,967 5,901 0.0085 17
8 Production Safety System Applica-
tion—Modification with more than 125
components reviewed .......................... 404 605 1,278 271,892 0.0085 768
Pre-Production inspection Facility
Offshore ................................................ 3 ........................ 9,313 27,939 0.0085 79
Pre-Production inspection Facility in
a Shipyard ............................................ 3 ........................ 8,100 24,300 0.0085 69
9 Production Safety System Applica-
tion—Modification with 25–125 compo-
nents reviewed ..................................... 1,424 217 439 316,128 0.0085 893
Pre-Production inspection Facility
Offshore ................................................ 3 ........................ 6,765 20,295 0.0085 57
Pre-Production inspection Facility in
a Shipyard ............................................ 3 ........................ 7,326 21,978 0.0085 62
10 Production Safety System Applica-
tion—Modification with fewer than 25
components reviewed .......................... 880 92 386 258,720 0.0085 731
Pre-Production inspection Facility
Offshore ................................................ 3 ........................ 4,513 13,539 0.0085 38
Pre-Production inspection Facility in
a Shipyard ............................................ 3 ........................ 2,141 6,423 0.0085 18
11 Platform Application—Installation—
Under the Platform Verification Pro-
gram ..................................................... 5 22,734 28,311 27,885 0.0111 103
12 Platform Application—Installation—
Fixed Structure Under the Platform Ap-
proval Program ..................................... 27 3,256 1,914 (36,234) 0.0106 (128)
13 Platform Application—Installation—
Caisson/Well Protector ......................... 41 1,657 1,914 10,537 0.0126 44
14 Platform Application—Modification/
Repair ................................................... 108 3,884 1,975 (206,172) 0.0075 (514)
15a New Pipeline Application (Lease
Term)—Shallow water (less than 1000
ft.) ......................................................... 12 3,541 1,584 (23,484) 0.0038 (30)
15b New Pipeline Application (Lease
Term)—Deepwater (greater than 1000
ft.) ......................................................... 369 3,541 3,663 45,018 0.0038 58
16a Pipeline Application—Modification
(Lease Term)—Minor ........................... 361 2,056 651 (507,205) 0.0040 (673)
16b Pipeline Application—Modification
(Lease Term)—Major ........................... 11 2,056 1,696 (3,960) 0.0040 (5)
17a Pipeline Application—Modification
(ROW)—Minor ...................................... 631 4,169 455 (2,343,534) 0.0083 (6,462)
17b Pipeline Application—Modification
(ROW)—Major ...................................... 21 4,169 1,800 (49,749) 0.0083 (137)
18 Pipeline Repair Notification .............. 397 388 557 67,093 0.0081 181
19a Pipeline ROW Grant Application—
Shallow water (less than 1000 ft.) ....... 121 2,771 1,662 (134,189) 0.0092 (409)
19b Pipeline ROW Grant Application—
Deepwater (greater than 1000 ft.) ........ 77 2,771 3,796 78,925 0.0092 241
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
20 Pipeline Conversion of Lease Term
to ROW ................................................. 35 236 494 9,030 0.0116 35
21 Pipeline ROW Assignment ............... 800 201 397 156,800 0.0092 478
22 500 Feet From Lease/Unit Line Pro-
duction Request ................................... 69 3,892 5,440 106,812 0.0093 330
23 Gas Cap Production Request .......... 87 4,953 11,962 609,783 0.0035 709
24 Downhole Commingling Request ..... 138 5,779 14,064 1,143,330 0.0048 1,828
25 Complex Surface Commingling and
Measurement Application ..................... 164 4,056 8,205 680,436 0.0082 1,863
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_81255/page/9.svg)
![81042 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
CHANGE IN COST PER SMALL ENTITY BY PROPOSED RULE PROVISION 1—Continued
[Negatives in parentheses]
Estimated Change in
(Est.) total Est.
Proposed fee total cost for Est. change in
counts for all Existing fee proportion
Service provided per all firms in cost per small
operators in per incidence of cost
incidence FY 2016– firm, per FY
FY 2016– per small firm
FY 2018
FY 2018
26 Simple Surface Commingling and
Measurement Application ..................... 251 1,371 3,514 537,893 0.0082 1,473
27 Voluntary Unitization Proposal or
Unit Expansion ..................................... 50 12,619 27,288 733,450 0.0021 522
28a Unitization Revision—Exhibit A,
Exhibit B, and Successor Unit Oper-
ator/Suboperator ................................... 154 896 1,683 121,198 0.0076 309
28b Unitization Revision—Exhibit C ...... 21 896 3,255 49,539 0.0076 126
29 Application to Remove a Platform or
Other Facility ........................................ 687 4,684 2,846 (1,262,706) 0.0089 (3,729)
30 Application to Decommission a
Pipeline (Lease Term) .......................... 707 1,142 857 (201,495) 0.0050 (333)
31 Application to Decommission a
Pipeline (ROW) .................................... 503 2,170 980 (598,570) 0.0077 (1,526)
Total 2 ................................................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 8,874
As a Percent of the Average
Sales Revenue of Small
Firms ($192 million) ............... ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 0.0046
1 Estimated dollar amounts are in 2016 dollars.
2 Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
BSEE has concluded the additional will annually evaluate the enforcement not substantially and directly affect the
costs of the proposed rule would impose activities and rate each agency’s relationship between the Federal and
an insignificant, negligible burden on responsiveness to small business. If you State governments. To the extent that
small entities. wish to comment on the actions of State and local governments have a role
BSEE, call 1–888–734–3247. You may in OCS activities, this proposed rule
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
comment to the SBA without fear of would not affect that role. A federalism
Fairness Act
retaliation. Allegations of assessment is not required.
The proposed rule is not a major rule discrimination/retaliation filed with the
under the Small Business Regulatory SBA will be investigated for appropriate Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
Enforcement Fairness Act, 5 U.S.C. action.
804(2). This proposed rule: This proposed rule complies with the
(a) Would not have an annual effect Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requirements of E.O. 12988.
on the economy of $100 million or This proposed rule would not impose Specifically, this proposed rule:
more; an unfunded mandate on State, local, or (1) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
(b) Would not cause a major increase tribal governments or the private sector requiring that all regulations be
in costs or prices for consumers, of more than $100 million per year. The reviewed to eliminate errors and
individual industries, Federal, State, or proposed rule would not have a ambiguity and be written to minimize
local government agencies, or significant or unique effect on State, litigation; and
geographic regions; and local, or tribal governments or the
(c) Would not have significant adverse private sector. Therefore, a statement (2) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
effects on competition, employment, containing the information required by requiring that all regulations be written
investment, productivity, innovation, or the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 in clear language and contain clear legal
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to U.S.C. 1501 et seq., is not required. standards.
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The requirements would apply to all Takings Implication Assessment (E.O. Consultation With Indian Tribal
entities operating on the Outer 12630) Governments (E.O. 13175)
Continental Shelf (OCS) regardless of Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this Under the criteria in E.O. 13175 and
company designation as a small proposed rule does not have significant the Department’s tribal consultation
business. For more information on costs takings implications. The proposed rule
affecting small businesses, see the policy, we have evaluated this proposed
is not a governmental action capable of
Regulatory Flexibility Act portion of this rule and have determined that it has no
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
interference with constitutionally
document. protected property rights. Therefore, a substantial direct effects on federally
Your comments are important. The Takings Implication Assessment is not recognized Indian tribes, or on the
Small Business and Agriculture required. relationship or distribution of power
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and responsibilities between the Federal
and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were Federalism (E.O. 13132) Government and Indian tribes, and that
established to receive comments from Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this consultation under the Department’s
small businesses about federal agency proposed rule does not have federalism tribal consultation policy is not
enforcement actions. The Ombudsman implications. This proposed rule would required.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_81255/page/10.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 81043
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 of information unless it displays a under Control Numbers 1014–0022,
This proposed rule contains a currently valid OMB control number. Subpart A (84,391 hour burden,
collection of information that will be OMB is required to make a decision $1,371,458 non-hour cost burden;
submitted to OMB for review and concerning the collection of information expiration 8/31/17); 1014–0024, Subpart
approval under the Paperwork contained in these proposed regulations B ($39,589 non-hour cost burden;
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 30 to 60 days after publication of this expiration 11/30/2018); 1014–0025
et seq.). As part of our continuing effort document in the Federal Register. Applications for Permit to Drill
to reduce paperwork and respondent Therefore, a comment to OMB is best ($862,104 non-hour cost burden,
burdens, BSEE invites the public and assured of having its full effect if OMB expiration 4/30/2017); 1014–0026,
other Federal agencies to comment on receives it by December 19, 2016. Applications for Permit to Modify
any aspect of the non-hour cost burden. The title of the collection of ($361,625 non-hour cost burden,
If you wish to comment on the information for this rule is 30 CFR part
expiration 5/31/2017); 1014–0003,
information collection (IC) aspects of 250, Adjustments to Cost Recovery Fees.
Subpart H ($323,481 non-hour cost
this proposed rule, you may send your The proposed regulations pertain to
BSEE updating its 31 cost recovery fees, burden; expiration 12/31/2017); 1014–
comments directly to OMB and send a 0011, Subpart I, ($392,874 non-hour
copy of your comments to the including additional fees for site visits
if deemed necessary. These proposed cost burden, expiration 5/31/2017);
Regulations and Standards Branch (see
changes are designed to recover the full 1014–0016, Subpart J ($1,508,968 non-
the ADDRESSES section of this proposed
cost BSEE incurs for providing these hour cost burden, expiration 8/31/2018);
rule). Please reference Adjustments to
Cost Recovery Fees Relating to the services. 1014–0019, Subpart K ($1,361,176 non-
Regulation of Oil, Gas, and Sulfur Potential respondents comprise hour cost burden, expiration 1/31/2019);
Activities on the Outer Continental Federal OCS oil, gas, and sulfur 1014–0002, Subpart L ($322,479 non-
Shelf, 1014—NEW, in your comments. operators and lessees, as well as hour cost burden, expiration 10/31/16);
BSEE specifically requests comments pipeline ROW holders. Responses to 1014–0015, Subpart M ($138,188 non-
concerning: The need for the this collection of information are hour cost burden, expiration 12/31/
information, its practical utility, the required to obtain or retain a benefit and 2017); and 1014–0010, Subpart Q
accuracy of the agency’s burden are mandatory. The frequency of ($1,686,396 non-hour cost burden,
estimate, and ways to minimize the response varies depending upon the expiration 10/31/2016), respectively.
burden. You may obtain a copy of the requirement. The IC does not include If this proposed rule is finalized and
supporting statement for the new questions of a sensitive nature. BSEE codified, the various non-hour cost
collection of information by contacting will protect proprietary information burdens and one new hour burden will
the Bureau’s Information Collection according to the Freedom of Information be removed from this collection of
Clearance Officer at (703) 787–1607. To Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and DOI’s
information and consolidated with their
see a copy of the entire IC request (ICR) implementing regulations (43 CFR part
primary information collection burden
submitted to OMB, go to http:// 2), 30 CFR 250.197, Data and
under their respective OMB Control
www.reginfo.gov (select Information information to be made available to the
public or for limited inspection, and 30 Numbers.
Collection Review, Currently Under
Review). CFR part 252, OCS Oil and Gas Hour burdens are included in the
The PRA provides that an agency may Information Program. regulatory requirements of various
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is OMB approved the IC burden of the OMB-approved ICRs, of which only one
not required to respond to, a collection existing 30 CFR part 250 regulations is changing and discussed in this ICR.
HOUR BURDEN TABLE
Average
Citation
30 CFR 250 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Hour burden number of annual Annual burden hours
responses
Subpart A
125; 126; 292; 1000; Cost recovery fees, applications, confirma- Cost Recovery Fees and related items are cov- 0.
1015; 1303. tion receipts, etc., verbal approvals per- ered individually throughout Part 250
taining to fees.
125(c) ......................... Request refund, including a reason for the 3 min. ......................... 200 requests .............. 10.
refund, within 150 days of the initial pay-
ment.
Total .................... ......................................................................... .................................... 200 responses ........... 10 hours.
BSEE currently receives approximately $9,000,000 for a total of [Existing non-hour cost burden/cost
approximately $7,000,000 in cost $16,000,000 in cost recovery fees. The recovery fees are in regular font;
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
recovery fees (non-hour cost burdens) following table provides a breakdown of proposed non-hour cost burden/cost
annually. This proposed rulemaking the non-hour cost burdens for this recovery fees and text are in italic font;
would increase that total by proposed rulemaking. new fees are in bold font]
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_81255/page/11.svg)
![81044 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
NON–HOUR COST BURDEN TABLE
Citation 30 CFR part 250 Service/cost recovery fee Non-hour cost burdens
Subpart A
171(e) ................................... Suspension of Operations and/or Suspension of Pro- $2,123 × 646 requests = $1,371,458.
duction (SOO/SOP) Request. $3,055 × 646 requests = $1,973,530.
Subpart B
292(q) ................................... Deepwater Operations Plan [simple and complex] ........ $3,599 × 11 plans = $39,589.
$14,290 × 7 simple DWOPs = $100,030.
$70,333 × 4 complex DWOPs = $281,332.
Applications for Permit to Drill
410(d); 513(b); 1617(a) ........ Application for Permit to Drill [initial permit] .................... $2,113 × 408 applications = $862,104.
$10,420 × 408 applications = $4,251,360.
Application for Permit to Modify
465(b); 513(b); 613(b); Application for Permit to Modify [initial permit] ............... $125 × 2,893 applications = $361,625.
1618(a); 1704(g). $1,680 × 2,893 applications = $4,860,240.
Subpart H
842 ....................................... New Facility Production Safety System Application for $5,426 × 1 application = $5,426.
facility with more than 125 components. $3,976 × 1 application = $3,976.
Pre-production Inspection—offshore ............................... $14,280 × 1 offshore = $14,280.
$13,534 × 1 offshore = $13,534.
Pre-production Inspection—shipyard .............................. $7,426 × 1 shipyard = $7,426.
$14,567 × 1 shipyard = $14,567.
842 ....................................... New Facility Production Safety System Application for $1,314 × 4 applications = $5,256.
facility with 25–125 components. $548 × 4 applications = $2,192.
Pre-production Inspection—offshore ............................... $8,967 × 1 offshore visit = $8,967.
$8,508 × 1 offshore visit = $8,508.
Pre-production Inspection—shipyard .............................. $5,141 × 1 shipyard = $5,141.
$9,818 × 1 shipyard = $9,818.
842 ....................................... New Facility Production Safety System Application for $652 × 10 applications = $6,520.
facility with fewer than 25 components. $463 × 10 applications = $4,630.
Pre-production Inspection—offshore ......................... $4,338 μ 1 offshore visit = $4,338.
Pre-production Inspection—shipyard ......................... $1,967 μ 1 shipyard = $1,967.
842 ....................................... Production Safety System Application—Modification $605 × 174 applications = $105,270.
with more than 125 components reviewed. $1,278 × 174 applications = $222,372.
Pre-production Inspection—offshore ......................... $9,313 μ 1 shipyard visit = $9,313.
Pre-production Inspection—shipyard ......................... $8,100 μ 1 shipyard visit = $8,100.
842 ....................................... Production Safety System Application—Modification $217 × 615 applications = $133,455.
with 25–125 components reviewed. $439 × 615 applications = $269,985.
Pre-production Inspection—offshore ......................... $6,765 μ 1 offshore = $6,765.
Pre-production Inspection—shipyard ......................... $7,326 μ 1 shipyard = $7,326.
842 ....................................... Production Safety System Application—Modification $92 × 345 applications = $31,740.
with fewer than 25 components reviewed. $386 × 345 applications = $133,170.
Pre-production Inspection—offshore ......................... $4,513 μ 1 offshore = $4,513.
Pre-production Inspection—shipyard ......................... $2,141 μ 1 shipyard = $2,141.
Subpart I
905(l) .................................... Platform Application—Installation—Under the Platform $22,734 × 3= $68,202.
Verification Program. $28,311 × 3 = $84,933.
905(l) .................................... Platform Application—Installation—Fixed Structure $3,256 × 12 = $39,072.
Under the Platform Approval Program. $1,914 × 12 = $22,968.
905(l) .................................... Platform Application—Installation—Caisson/Well Pro- $1,657 × 20 = $33,140.
tector. $1,914 × 20 = $38,280.
905(1) ................................... Platform Application—Modification/Repair ...................... $3,884 × 65 applications = $252,460.
$1,975 × 65 applications = $128,375.
Subpart J
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
1000(b) ................................. Submit application and all required information and no- $3,541 × 61 L/T P/L applications = $216,001.
tices to install new lease term pipeline (L/T P/L)..
Submit application and all required information and no- $1,584 × 2 applications = $3,168.
tices to modify a L/T P/L—Shallow Water (less than
1,000 ft.).
Submit application and all required information and no- $3,663 × 59 applications = $216,117.
tices to modify a L/T P/L—Deepwater (greater than
1,000 ft.).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_81255/page/12.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 81049
service fees listed in § 250.125 of this approved ROW grant must be pipeline ROW grant application is
part for a pipeline ROW grant to install accompanied by the additional rental divided into two levels based on water
a new pipeline, or to convert an existing required under § 250.1012, if applicable. depth, as shown in the following table:
lease term pipeline into an ROW You must file a separate application for
pipeline. An application to modify an each ROW. The service fee for a
Application type Description
(1) Shallow water applications ............................ Applications for a pipeline ROW grant for pipelines that will be located in their entirety within
water depths of 1,000 feet or less.
(2) Deepwater applications ................................. Applications for a pipeline ROW grant for pipelines, any portion of which will be located in
water depths greater than 1,000 feet.
* * * * * (d) You must pay the service fee listed Additionally, you must pay the service
■ 7. In § 250.1303, revise paragraph (d) in § 250.125 of this part with your fee listed in § 250.125 with your request
to read as follows: request for a voluntary unitization for unitization revision. The service fee
§ 250.1303 How do I apply for voluntary proposal or the expansion of a for a request for unitization revision is
unitization? previously approved voluntary unit to divided into two levels, as shown in the
* * * * * include additional acreage. following table:
Application type Description
(1) Exhibits A and B ............................................ Applications for revisions to Exhibit A and/or Exhibit B or designation of Successor Unit Oper-
ators and/or Successor Unit Sub-operators.
(2) Exhibit C ........................................................ Applications for revisions to Exhibit C.
[FR Doc. 2016–27500 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am] information and analysis, as well as along with more information about
BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P reopening comment on any other aspect dockets generally, is available at http://
of the proposal or the underlying www.epa.gov/dockets.
support documents that were previously FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION available for comment. The EPA Dana Friedman, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
AGENCY continues to seek comment on possible Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
mitigation strategies, namely, use Programs, Environmental Protection
40 CFR Part 180 deletions, which might allow the EPA to Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0653; FRL–9954–65] retain a small subset of existing Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
chlorpyrifos food uses. Commenters number: (703) 347–8827; email address:
Chlorpyrifos; Tolerance Revocations; need not resubmit comments previously friedman.dana@epa.gov.
Notice of Data Availability and Request submitted. EPA will consider those SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
for Comment comments, as well as comments in
response to this notice, in taking a final I. How should I submit Confidential
AGENCY: Environmental Protection action. Business Information (CBI) to the
Agency (EPA). Agency?
DATES: Submit comments on or before
ACTION: Proposed rule.
January 17, 2017. Do not submit this information to EPA
SUMMARY: EPA is announcing and ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, electronically. Clearly mark the part or
inviting comment on additional identified by docket identification (ID) all of the information that you claim to
information obtained and developed by number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0653, by be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
EPA in conjunction with the proposed one of the following methods: CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark
tolerance revocation for chlorpyrifos. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as
This information includes the revised www.regulations.gov. Follow the online CBI and then identify electronically
human health risk assessment and the instructions for submitting comments. within the disk or CD–ROM the specific
drinking water assessment. It also Do not submit electronically any information that is claimed as CBI. In
includes EPA’s issue paper and information you consider to be addition to one complete version of the
supporting analyses presented to the Confidential Business Information (CBI) comment that includes information
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and or other information whose disclosure is claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Scientific restricted by statute. that does not contain the information
Advisory Panel’s (SAP) meeting in April • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental claimed as CBI must be submitted for
2016 that addressed chlorpyrifos Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ inclusion in the public docket.
biomonitoring data and adverse DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. Information so marked will not be
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
neurodevelopmental outcomes, public NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. disclosed except in accordance with
comments received during the meeting, • Hand Delivery: To make special procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
the FIFRA SAP’s meeting minutes and arrangements for hand delivery or
the FIFRA SAP report. EPA is delivery of boxed information, please II. Purpose of This Document
specifically soliciting comments on the follow the instructions at http:// EPA is reopening the comment period
validity and propriety of the use of all www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. on the proposed rule: Entitled
the new information, data, and analyses. Additional instructions on ‘‘Chlorpyrifos; Tolerance Revocations’’
EPA is accepting comment on the commenting or visiting the docket, (80 FR 69080, November 6, 2015) (FRL–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_81255/page/17.svg)
Document Created: 2016-11-17 03:00:16
Document Modified: 2016-11-17 03:00:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | BSEE will consider all comments received by January 17, 2017. BSEE may not consider comments received after this date. Submit comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on the information collection burden in this proposed rule by December 19, 2016. | |
| Contact | Kimberly Monaco, Budget Analyst, Office of Budget at (703) 787-1658, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 81033 | |
| RIN Number | 1014-AA31 | |
| CFR Associated | Administrative Practice and Procedure; Continental Shelf; Environmental Impact Statements; Environmental Protection; Government Contracts; Investigations; Oil and Gas Exploration; Penalties; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR