81_FR_81274 81 FR 81052 - State of Nebraska; Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program

81 FR 81052 - State of Nebraska; Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 222 (November 17, 2016)

Page Range81052-81052
FR Document2016-27683

Nebraska has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for final authorization of revisions to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA is proposing to grant final authorization to Nebraska.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 81052]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R07-RCRA-2016-0637; FRL-9955-24-Region 7]


State of Nebraska; Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Nebraska has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) for final authorization of revisions to its hazardous waste 
program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA is 
proposing to grant final authorization to Nebraska.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by 
December 19, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
RCRA-2016-0637, to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA 
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Haugen, EPA Region 7, Enforcement 
Coordination Office, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219, 
phone number: (913) 551-7877, or email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal 
Register, EPA is authorizing the revisions by a direct final rule. EPA 
did not make a proposal prior to the direct final rule because we 
believe this action is not controversial and do not expect comments 
that oppose it. We have explained the reasons for this authorization in 
the preamble of the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments 
are received in response to this action, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this 
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives 
adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of 
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional 
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules 
section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: November 3, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2016-27683 Filed 11-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                  81052               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules

                                                  IV. What analysis and data are being                    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides                  consider comments or comment
                                                  noticed?                                                and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping                contents located outside of the primary
                                                     1. EPA is seeking comment on the                     requirements.                                         submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
                                                  following updates to the chlorpyrifos                     Dated: November 10, 2016.                           other file sharing system). For
                                                  human health risk assessment: (1) Use                   Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
                                                                                                                                                                additional submission methods, the full
                                                  of the crack and crevice scenario to                                                                          EPA public comment policy,
                                                                                                          Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
                                                  derive an exposure level for women in                                                                         information about CBI or multimedia
                                                                                                          [FR Doc. 2016–27552 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  the Columbia study; (2) using the                                                                             submissions, and general guidance on
                                                                                                          BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                making effective comments, please visit
                                                  LOAEL from the Columbia study and
                                                  PBPK modeling to derive an endpoint                                                                           http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
                                                  for use in quantitative risk assessment;                                                                      commenting-epa-dockets.
                                                                                                          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                  (3) use of the 10X uncertainty factor for               AGENCY                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
                                                  intraspecies variability; (4) use of the                                                                      Haugen, EPA Region 7, Enforcement
                                                  10X FQPA safety factor for LOAEL to                     40 CFR Part 271                                       Coordination Office, 11201 Renner
                                                  NOAEL extrapolation (please include                                                                           Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219,
                                                                                                          [EPA–R07–RCRA–2016–0637; FRL–9955–
                                                  your rationale for any alternative values                                                                     phone number: (913) 551–7877, or email
                                                                                                          24-Region 7]
                                                  suggested for this factor). Its analysis is                                                                   address: haugen.lisa@epa.gov.
                                                  included in the Chlorpyrifos: Revised                   State of Nebraska; Authorization of                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
                                                  Human Health Risk Assessment for                        State Hazardous Waste Management                      final rules section of the Federal
                                                  Registration Review (2016), which is                    Program                                               Register, EPA is authorizing the
                                                  available in the chlorpyrifos tolerance                                                                       revisions by a direct final rule. EPA did
                                                  revocation docket (EPA–HQ–OPP–                          AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                     not make a proposal prior to the direct
                                                  2015–0653).                                             Agency (EPA).                                         final rule because we believe this action
                                                     2. EPA is also making available for                  ACTION: Proposed rule.                                is not controversial and do not expect
                                                  comment the issue paper and associated                                                                        comments that oppose it. We have
                                                                                                          SUMMARY:   Nebraska has applied to the
                                                  materials presented to the April 2016                                                                         explained the reasons for this
                                                                                                          Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
                                                  FIFRA SAP and the final report of the                                                                         authorization in the preamble of the
                                                                                                          for final authorization of revisions to its
                                                  SAP. The FIFRA SAP materials and                                                                              direct final rule. If no relevant adverse
                                                                                                          hazardous waste program under the
                                                  final report are available in the FIFRA                                                                       comments are received in response to
                                                                                                          Resource Conservation and Recovery
                                                  SAP docket (EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–                                                                                  this action, no further activity is
                                                                                                          Act (RCRA). EPA is proposing to grant
                                                  0062).                                                                                                        contemplated in relation to this action.
                                                     3. EPA is also seeking comment on                    final authorization to Nebraska.
                                                                                                                                                                If EPA receives relevant adverse
                                                  Chlorpyrifos Registration Review                        DATES: Comments on this proposed
                                                                                                                                                                comments, the direct final rule will be
                                                  Drinking Water Assessment, a highly                     action must be received in writing by                 withdrawn and all public comments
                                                  refined drinking water assessment that                  December 19, 2016.                                    received will be addressed in a
                                                  updates and completes the agency’s                      ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,                      subsequent final rule based on this
                                                  examination of exposure through                         identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–                  proposed action. EPA will not institute
                                                  drinking water for all registered uses of               RCRA–2016–0637, to http://                            a second comment period on this action.
                                                  chlorpyrifos. This assessment integrates                www.regulations.gov. Follow the online                Any parties interested in commenting
                                                  regionally specific (i.e., spatially                    instructions for submitting comments.                 on this action should do so at this time.
                                                  relevant) estimated drinking water                      Once submitted, comments cannot be                    Please note that if EPA receives adverse
                                                  concentrations and an extensive                         edited or removed from Regulations.gov.               comment on part of this rule and if that
                                                  evaluation of available surface water                   The EPA may publish any comment                       part can be severed from the remainder
                                                  monitoring data for chlorpyrifos and                    received to its public docket. Do not                 of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
                                                  chlorpyrifos-oxon. The assessment                       submit electronically any information                 those parts of the rule that are not the
                                                  considers both agricultural and non-                    you consider to be Confidential                       subject of an adverse comment. For
                                                  agricultural uses of chlorpyrifos, a                    Business Information (CBI) or other                   additional information, see the direct
                                                  sensitivity analysis for model estimated                information whose disclosure is                       final rule which is located in the rules
                                                  concentrations, and statistical                         restricted by statute. Multimedia                     section of this Federal Register.
                                                  evaluation of surface water monitoring                  submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
                                                                                                          accompanied by a written comment.                       Dated: November 3, 2016.
                                                  data.
                                                                                                          The written comment is considered the                 Mark Hague,
                                                  List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180                     official comment and should include                   Regional Administrator, Region 7.
                                                   Environmental protection,                              discussion of all points you wish to                  [FR Doc. 2016–27683 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  Administrative practice and procedure,                  make. The EPA will generally not                      BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:46 Nov 16, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00038   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM   17NOP1



Document Created: 2016-11-17 03:00:35
Document Modified: 2016-11-17 03:00:35
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule.
DatesComments on this proposed action must be received in writing by December 19, 2016.
ContactLisa Haugen, EPA Region 7, Enforcement Coordination Office, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219,
FR Citation81 FR 81052 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR