81 FR 83771 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana; Revisions to the New Source Review State Implementation Plan; Air Permit Procedure Revisions
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 225 (November 22, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 225 (November 22, 2016)
| Page Range | 83771-83775 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28003 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 83771-83775] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28003] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-OAR-2016-0206; FRL-9954-83-Region 6] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana; Revisions to the New Source Review State Implementation Plan; Air Permit Procedure Revisions AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to partially approve and partially disapprove severable portions of four revisions to the Louisiana New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ). Specifically, we are proposing to partially approve and partially [[Page 83772]] disapprove provisions contained within the Chapter 5 air construction permit rules as initially submitted on November 15, 1993, November 10, 1994, November 9, 2007, and November 3, 2014. The EPA is proposing this action under section 110 and parts C and D of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06- OAR-2016-0206, at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact Stephanie Kordzi, 214- 665-7520, [email protected]. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Kordzi, (214) 665-7520, [email protected] or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA. I. Background The Act at Section 110(a)(2)(C) requires states to develop and submit to the EPA for approval into the SIP, preconstruction review programs applicable to new and modified stationary sources of air pollutants for attainment and nonattainment areas that cover both major and minor new sources and modifications, collectively referred to as the NSR SIP. The CAA NSR SIP program is composed of three separate programs: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), Non-attainment NSR (NNSR), and Minor NSR. PSD is established in part C of title I of the CAA and applies in areas that meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), i.e., ``attainment areas'', as well as areas where there is insufficient information to determine if the area meets the NAAQS, i.e., ``unclassifiable areas.'' The NNSR SIP program is established in part D of title I of the CAA and applies in areas that are not in attainment of the NAAQS, i.e., ``nonattainment areas.'' The Minor NSR SIP program addresses construction or modification activities that do not emit, or have the potential to emit, beyond certain major source thresholds and thus do not qualify as ``major'' and applies regardless of the designation of the area in which a source is located. The EPA regulations governing the criteria that states must satisfy for the EPA approval of the NSR programs as part of the SIP are contained in 40 CFR Sections 51.160-51.166. In addition, there are several provisions in 40 CFR part 51 that apply generally to all SIP revisions. As stated above, 40 CFR Section 51.160 establishes the enforceable procedures that all NSR programs must include. Sections 51.160-51.164 require that a SIP revision demonstrate that the adopted rules will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. Section 51.165 provides the minimum regulatory criteria for NNSR permitting programs and Section 51.166 provides the minimum regulatory criteria for approvable PSD permitting programs. Based upon our evaluation of the submittals, the EPA has concluded that three of the regulatory citations identified in this action do not meet the requirements of the CAA section 110(l). Below are summaries of the individual SIP submittals from the Secretary of the LDEQ. A. The November 15, 1993, Louisiana SIP Submittal On November 15, 1993, the LDEQ submitted revisions to the SIP. This SIP submittal incorporated revisions to the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) during the year 1993. It includes from Chapter 5, final revised regulation Sections 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 507, 511, 513, 515, 517, 519, 521, 523, 525, 527, 529, 531, and 533. The EPA acted on most of the rule language contained in these sections in its August 4, 2016, final notice. See 81 FR 51341 (August 4, 2016). The EPA is proposing action at this time on the portions of the November 15, 1993 submittal that were not included in our August 4, 2016 final action. This action is on those portions that were not included in that notice. The EPA is proposing approval of LAC 33:III, Chapter 5, Sections 525.A., 525.A.1., 525.A.3., 525.B., 525.B.1., 525.B.2, 527.A., 527.A.1., 527.A.2., 527.A.3., 527.B., 527.BN.1., 527.B.2., 529.A., 529.A.1., 529.A.2, 531.B.2 and 531.B.3. The LDEQ withdrew LAC 33:III, Chapter 5, Sections 525.A.2., 525.B.2.c., 525.B.3., 525.B.4., 525.B.5., 525.B.6., 525.B.7., 525.B.8., 527.B.5., 529.B.1., 529.B.2., 529.B.3., 529.B.4., in its letter of July 14, 2016, due to the provisions applying only to Part 70 sources. The EPA is proposing disapproval of section 501.B.1.d. which adds ``upsets'' to the list of activities exempt from permitting requirements. The basis for our disapproval is that the rule references the definition of ``upset'' in LAC 33:III.507.J.1 which is not part of the SIP submittal; the definition of ``upset'' is part of Louisiana's Title V program rules and mirrors the definition of ``emergency condition'' found at 40 CFR 70.6(g)(1), a rule which the EPA has proposed for removal from its Part 70 rules. See 81 FR 38645 (June 4, 2016). The EPA is also proposing disapproval of the provisions for public notice that are inconsistent with federal laws and found in sections 513.A.1. and 531.A.1. B. November 10, 1994, Submittal On November 10, 1994, the LDEQ submitted revisions to the SIP. This SIP submittal incorporated revisions to the LAC published in the Louisiana Register on November 20, 1994. It includes final revised regulations at LAC 33:III, Chapter 5, Sections 501, 507, 517, 521, 527, and 533. The EPA acted on most of the rule language contained in these sections in its final notice 81 FR 51341 (August 4, 2016). This action is on those portions that were not included in that notice. The EPA is proposing to take action on sections 527.A.2., 527.A.2.c., 527.B., 527.B.1., 527.B.2.a., and 527.B.2.b. The EPA returned sections 507 and 533 rules due to their association with part 70 sources requirements to LDEQ on August 4, 2015. [[Page 83773]] C. The November 9, 2007, Louisiana SIP Submittal On November 9, 2007, the LDEQ submitted the 2006 General Revisions to the Louisiana SIP. This SIP submittal incorporated revisions to the LAC during the year 2006 and revisions to the LAC not previously federally approved. It includes from Chapter 5, final revised regulation sections 501, 504, 509, 513, and 531. The EPA acted on most of the rule language contained in these sections in its final notice 80 FR 68451 (November 5, 2015) and final notice 81 FR 51341 (August 4, 2016). This action is on those portions that were not included in those notices. The EPA proposes approval for section 531.B.3. This action proposes for disapproval the provisions for public notice that are inconsistent with federal laws and found in sections 513.A.1. D. The November 3, 2014, Louisiana SIP Submittal On November 3, 2014, the LDEQ submitted the 2011-2013 Permit Rule revisions to the SIP. This SIP submittal incorporated revisions to the LAC during the years 2011-2012. It includes from Chapter 5, final revised regulation sections 501, 502, 503, 504, 523, and 537. The EPA acted on most of the rule language contained in these sections in its final notice 81 FR 51341 (August 4, 2016). This action is on that portion that was not included in that notice. This action proposes disapproval of the provisions regarding section 501.B.1.d. which adds ``upsets'' to the list of activities exempt from permitting requirements. The basis for our disapproval is that the rule references the definition of ``upset'' in LAC 33:III.507.J.1 which is not part of the SIP submittal; the definition of ``upset'' is part of Louisiana's Title V program rules and mirrors the definition of ``emergency condition'' found at 40 CFR 70.6(g)(1), a rule which the EPA has proposed for removal from its Part 70 rules. See 81 FR 38645 (June 4, 2016). II. The EPA's Evaluation We evaluated the SIP submissions of the specific citations of the Louisiana Air Permit Procedure Revisions identified above and revised in the November 15, 1993, November 10, 1994, November 9, 2007, and November 3, 2014, submissions. A. Revisions to the NSR Air Permit Procedures We evaluated the SIP submissions and are proposing approval of the Louisiana Permit Procedures Revisions, as identified, beginning with the November 15, 1993, through the November 3, 2014, submissions. Prior to this action, the EPA proposed full approval of the major PSD and NNSR and minor NSR permitting program update. Those actions were finalized on November 5, 2015 (80 FR 68451) and August 4, 2016 (81 FR 51341). Our evaluation of the proposed NSR revisions found, with the exception of the items proposed for disapproval and discussed below, the proposed revisions address requirements that enhance the SIP. These changes proposed for approval, in general: (1) Clarify the rules; (2) make the rules more consistent with Federal rules; (3) establish permit modification procedures; (4) establish reopening procedures: and (5) establish notification procedures of PSD permit actions to states outside of Louisiana.Proposed Disapproval: The EPA is proposing disapproval of the SIP revisions to section 501.B.1.d. submitted by the State of Louisiana on November 15, 1993, and updated on November 3, 2014. More specifically, Louisiana submitted a revision to LAC 33:III.501.B.1 that revises the list of specific activities that are exempt from the requirement to obtain a permit to add: ``d. any upset, as defined in LAC 33:III.507.J.1; however, the permitting authority shall be advised of such occurrences without delay, in accordance with all applicable upset or emergency provisions of Louisiana Air Quality regulations and of LAC 33.I. Chapter 39; . . .'' EPA's interpretation of the CAA requirements for SIPs, including minor NSR permitting programs, is that upsets are generally not the kind of activities that are amenable to NSR permitting due to their nature of being unforeseeable, unpredictable, beyond the control of the owner or operator of the source. However, the reference to the definition of ``upset'' in LAC 33:III.507.J.1 is problematic because that definition is not in the Louisiana SIP or currently before EPA for review, rather it is part of Louisiana's Title V regulations that are inconsistent with EPA's proposed rulemaking found in 81 FR 38645 (June 4, 2016), to amend its Title V regulations to remove the ``emergency provision'' found in 40 CFR 70.6(g) and 71.6(g). The ``emergency provision'' definition in 40 CFR 70.6(g)(1) mirrors LDEQ's definition of ``upset'' found in LAC 33:III.507.J.1, which is referenced in section 501.B.1.d. If finalized, that rulemaking would require LDEQ to also remove the affirmative defense language from its Title V rules, including the language at LAC 33:III.507.J which is part of Louisiana's approved Title V program. Proposed Approval: The EPA is proposing approval of sections 525.A.1. and 525.A.3. rules for incorporating minor modification procedures consistent with federal law. Section 525.A.1. pertains to the minor NSR permit program only. Proposed Approval: The EPA is proposing approval of sections 527.A., 527.A.1., 527.A.2., 527.A.2.a., 527.A.2.b., 527.A.2.c., 527.B., 527 B.1., B.2., B.3., and B.4., rules that incorporate significant modification procedures consistent with federal law. Proposed Approval: The EPA is proposing approval of sections 529.A., 529.A.1., 529.A.1.a., 529.A.1.b., and 529.A.2. for permit reopening for cause procedures consistent with federal law. Proposed Approval: The EPA is proposing approval of sections 531.B.2. and 531.B.3. for state permit notification procedures consistent with federal law. Proposed Disapproval: The EPA is proposing disapproval of Section 513A.1. based on this rule language referencing and relying on the discretionary public notice rule found in section 531.A.1 which is being proposed for partial disapproval. However, as stated above, the currently approved SIP contains adequate public notice provisions for minor NSR sources. Proposed Disapproval: The EPA is proposing disapproval of section 531.A. based on the information in its March 3, 2003, letter to LDEQ, which is included in the docket. The EPA notified the LDEQ that 40 CFR 51.161(a) requires opportunity for public comment and applies to all proposed decisions concerning new and modified sources. As currently written, Louisiana's revised rule section 531.A. submitted on November 15, 1993, states: ``531.A. Public Notice 1. At the discretion of the permitting authority, public notice may be provided prior to issuance of any new or revised permit under this Chapter.'' This discretionary language does not conform to the Federal requirements at Section 51.161. Section 51.161(a) provides: ``The legally enforceable procedures in Sec. 51.160 must also require the State or local agency to provide opportunity for public comment on information submitted by owners and operators. The public information must include the agency's analysis of the effect of construction or modification on ambient air quality, including the agency's proposed approval or disapproval.'' (Emphasis added.) Section 51.161(a), clearly mandates that legally enforceable procedures require the State or local agency to provide [[Page 83774]] opportunity for public comment. Thus the current language in 531.A. is not approvable under 40 CFR 51.161 as it allows the permitting agency discretion whether to provide for public notice. B. Does the proposed approval of the Louisiana Minor and Nonattainment NSR Air Permit Procedure Revisions interfere with attainment, reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the Act? We have determined that the regulations submitted to the EPA and being proposed for approval as SIP revisions meet the requirements of CAA section 110(l). The EPA's conclusion is based upon a line-by-line comparison of the proposed revisions with the federal requirements. The goal is to demonstrate that the proposed revisions will not interfere with the attainment of the NAAQS, Rate of Progress, RFP or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. Most of the changes were not substantial. Our analysis shows that in most cases, the state regulatory language is consistent with and in support of the intent of the federal rules and definitions. The EPA is therefore proposing to approve these submittals. III. Proposed Action We are proposing to partially approve and partially disapprove the Louisiana SIP revisions submitted by the State of Louisiana in accordance with the EPA regulations at 40 CFR 51.160-51.164 and under Section 110 and part C of the Act, and for the reasons presented above and included in our accompanying TSD. Table 1 below summarizes the changes that are in the SIP revision submittals. The accompanying Technical Support Document (TSD) includes a detailed evaluation of the submittals and our rationale. The TSD may be accessed online at www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2016-0206. Table 1_Summary of Each NSR SIP Submittal Affected by This Action Proposed Approval ____________________________________ Date submitted to Section EPA as SIP Affected regulation amendment ____________________________________ Section 525_Minor Modifications ____________________________________ Section 525.A................. 11/15/1993 Sections 525.A., 525.A.1., 525.A.3. Section 525.B................. 11/15/1993 Sections 525.B., 525.B.1. and 525.B.2. ____________________________________ Section 527_Significant Modifications ____________________________________ Section 527.A................. 11/15/1993 Sections 527.A., 527.A.1., 527.A.2., and 527.A.3. 11/10/1994 Sections 527.A.2., 527.A.2.c. Section 527.B................. 11/15/1993 Sections 527.B., 527.B.1., 527.B.2.a., and 527.B.2.b. 11/10/1994 Section 527.B. ____________________________________ Section 529_Reopenings for Cause ____________________________________ Section 529.A................. 11/15/1993 Sections 529.A., 529.A.1. and 529A.2. Section 529.B................. 11/15/1993 Sections 529.B., 529.B.1., 529.B.2., 529.B.3., and 529.B.4. ____________________________________ Section 531_Public Notice and Affected State Notice ____________________________________ Section 531.B................. 11/15/1993 Section 531.B.2. and 531.B.3. 11/9/2007 Section 531.B.3. ____________________________________ Table 2_Summary of Each NSR SIP Submittal Affected by This Action Proposed Disapproval ____________________________________ Date submitted to Section EPA as SIP Affected regulation amendment ____________________________________ Section 501_Scope and Applicability ____________________________________ Section 501.B................... 11/15/1993 Section 501.B.1.d. 11/3/2014 Section 501.B.1.d. ____________________________________ Section 513_General Permits, Temporary Sources, and Relocation of Portable Facilities ____________________________________ Section 513.A................... 11/15/1993 Section 513.A.1. 11/9/2007 Section 513.A.1. ____________________________________ Section 531_Public Notice and Affected State Notice ____________________________________ Section 531.A................... 11/15/1993 Section 531.A.1. ____________________________________ IV. Incorporation by Reference In this action, we are proposing to include in a final rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are proposing to incorporate by reference revisions to the Louisiana regulations as described in the Proposed Action section above. We have made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office. [[Page 83775]] V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to act on state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This proposed action is not a significant regulatory action and was therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This proposed action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA because the portion of the rules that are proposed for approval do not contain any information collection activities and incorporate notification requirements to government entities consistent with federal law, significant and minor permit modification criteria, and permit reopening criteria. Further, this action proposes to disapprove specific submitted revisions regarding discretionary public notice and upset that are not consistent with federal laws for the regulation and permitting of air emission sources. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action proposes to approve regulatory citations that incorporate notification requirements to government entities consistent with federal law, significant and minor permit modification criteria, and permit reopening criteria. This action proposes to disapprove revisions regarding discretionary public notice and an exemption of upsets from permitting requirements that are no longer consistent with federal law for the regulation and permitting of air emission sources. Therefore it will have no impact on small entities. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. This action proposes to approve specific citations that incorporate notification requirements to government entities consistent with federal law, significant and minor permit modification criteria, and permit reopening criteria. This action proposes to disapprove submitted revisions regarding discretionary public notice and upset exemptions that are no longer consistent with federal law for the regulation and permitting of air emission sources. It therefore will have no impact on small governments. E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. This action proposes to approve specific citations that incorporate notification requirements to government entities consistent with federal law, significant and minor permit modification criteria, and permit reopening criteria. This action proposes to disapprove submitted revisions regarding discretionary public notice and upset exemptions that are no longer consistent with federal law for the regulation and permitting of air emission sources. There are no requirements or responsibilities added or removed from Indian Tribal Governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it proposes to approve specific citations that incorporate notification requirements to government entities consistent with federal law, significant and minor permit modification criteria, and permit reopening criteria. This action proposes to disapprove submitted revisions regarding discretionary public notice and upset exemptions that are no longer consistent with federal law for the regulation and permitting of air emission sources. H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income or indigenous populations. This action is not subject to Executive Order 12898 because it proposes to approve specific citations that incorporate notification requirements to government entities consistent with federal law, significant and minor permit modification criteria, and permit reopening criteria. This action proposes to disapprove submitted revisions regarding discretionary public notice and upset exemptions that are no longer consistent with federal law for the regulation and permitting of air emission sources. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: November 16, 2016. Ron Curry, Regional Administrator, Region 6. [FR Doc. 2016-28003 Filed 11-21-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules 83771
PROCESSES AUTHORIZED FOR THE TREATMENT OF WINE, JUICE, AND DISTILLING MATERIAL—Continued
Process Use Reference or limitation
* * * * * * *
Spinning cone column 2 .................................... To reduce the ethyl alcohol content of wine Use shall not alter vinous character. For
and to remove off flavors in wine. standard wine, the same amount of essence
must be added back to any lot of wine as
was originally removed.
* * * * * * *
Thin film evaporation under reduced To separate wine into a low alcohol wine frac- Use shall not alter vinous character. Water
preasure 2. tion and into a higher alcohol distillate. separated with alcohol during processing
may be recovered by refluxing in a closed
continuous system and returned to the wine.
The addition of water other than that origi-
nally present in the wine prior to processing,
will render standard wine other than stand-
ard wine.
1 In cross-flow filtration, the wine is passed across the filter membrane (tangentially) at positive pressure relative to the permeate side. A pro-
portion of the wine which is smaller than the membrane pore size passes through the membrane as permeate or filtrate; everything else is re-
tained on the feed side of the membrane as retentate.
2 When used to remove ethyl alcohol (dealcoholization), this process must be done on distilled spirits plant premises. However, reverse osmo-
sis and nanofilitration, under certain limited conditions, may be used on bonded winery premises if ethyl alcohol is only temporarily created within
a closed system.
* * * * * (b) Removal of accidentally added accidentally added to the wine was
■10. Paragraph (b) of § 24.250 is water with TTB approval. If a proprietor removed as a result of the treatment or
amended to read as follows: accidentally adds water to standard process.
wine and the accidentally added water (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85–859, 72 Stat. 1383–
§ 24.250 Application for use of new
treating material or process.
represents more than 10 percent of the 1384, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5382))
original volume of the wine, then the
(b) Documentary evidence from the proprietor must request permission from Signed: June 16, 2016.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration that TTB prior to treating the wine. A John J. Manfreda,
the material is consistent with the food proprietor may submit an application Administrator.
additive requirements under the Federal requesting permission to treat the wine Approved: October 25, 2016.
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for its to remove the water and return the wine Timothy E. Skud,
intended purpose in the amounts to its original condition. The removal of Deputy Assistant Secretary. (Tax, Trade, and
proposed for the particular treatment water may not be conducted until the Tariff Policy).
contemplated; appropriate TTB officer has approved [FR Doc. 2016–27581 Filed 11–21–16; 8:45 am]
* * * * * the request. The application, which is to BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
■ 11. Section 24.251 is added to read as be submitted to the appropriate TTB
follows: officer, must be in writing, must provide
§ 24.251 Salvaging accidentally diluted evidence of the exact amount of water ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
wine. accidentally added to the wine and an AGENCY
(a) Removal of accidentally added explanation of how the water was
water without prior TTB approval. If a accidentally added, and must specify 40 CFR Part 52
proprietor accidentally adds to standard the method the proprietor will use to
remove the water from the wine. In [EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0206; FRL–9954–83–
wine water in excess of limitations Region 6]
specified in subparts F and L of this approving any request under this
part, the accidentally diluted wine may section, the appropriate TTB officer may Approval and Promulgation of
be returned to its original condition require the proprietor to take steps to Implementation Plans; Louisiana;
through the use of reverse osmosis and prevent future accidental additions of Revisions to the New Source Review
distillation without prior application to water to wine. In evaluating any request State Implementation Plan; Air Permit
TTB provided that: under this section, the appropriate TTB Procedure Revisions
(1) The accidentally added water officer may consider as a factor whether
represents no more than 10 percent of the proprietor has demonstrated good AGENCY: Environmental Protection
the original volume of the wine; commercial practices, taking into Agency (EPA).
(2) The wine is returned to its original account the proprietor’s prior history of ACTION: Proposed rule.
condition by removing an amount of accidental addition of water to wine and
water equal to the amount that was of compliance with other regulations in SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
part 24. Agency (EPA) is proposing to partially
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
accidentally added to the wine;
(3) The vinous character of the wine (c) Records. The proprietor must, with approve and partially disapprove
is not altered; respect to removals of water from wine severable portions of four revisions to
(4) The proprietor transfers the wine authorized under this section, maintain the Louisiana New Source Review
in bond to a distilled spirits plant for records that document the accidental (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP)
treatment; and addition of water, the use of any submitted by the Louisiana Department
(5) Records are maintained in treatment or process to remove the of Environmental Quality (LDEQ).
accordance with paragraph (c) of this water from the wine, and the fact that Specifically, we are proposing to
section. only the amount of water that was partially approve and partially
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Nov 21, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM 22NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_83996/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules 83775
V. Statutory and Executive Order enforceable duty on any state, local or notice and upset exemptions that are no
Reviews tribal governments or the private sector. longer consistent with federal law for
Under the CAA, the Administrator is This action proposes to approve specific the regulation and permitting of air
required to approve a SIP submission citations that incorporate notification emission sources.
that complies with the provisions of the requirements to government entities
consistent with federal law, significant H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
and minor permit modification criteria, Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
and permit reopening criteria. This Distribution or Use
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to act on state law as action proposes to disapprove submitted
revisions regarding discretionary public This action is not subject to Executive
meeting Federal requirements and does Order 13211 because it is not a
not impose additional requirements notice and upset exemptions that are no
longer consistent with federal law for significant regulatory action under
beyond those imposed by state law. Executive Order 12866.
the regulation and permitting of air
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory emission sources. It therefore will have I. National Technology Transfer and
Planning and Review and Executive no impact on small governments.
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Advancement Act
Regulatory Review E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not involve
This proposed action is not a This action does not have federalism technical standards.
significant regulatory action and was implications. It will not have substantial
therefore not submitted to the Office of direct effects on the states, on the J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Management and Budget for review. relationship between the national Actions To Address Environmental
government and the states, or on the Justice in Minority Populations and
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) distribution of power and Low-Income Populations
This proposed action does not impose responsibilities among the various
an information collection burden under levels of government. EPA believes the human health or
the PRA because the portion of the rules environmental risk addressed by this
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination action will not have potential
that are proposed for approval do not With Indian Tribal Governments
contain any information collection disproportionately high and adverse
activities and incorporate notification This action does not have tribal human health or environmental effects
requirements to government entities implications as specified in Executive on minority, low-income or indigenous
consistent with federal law, significant Order 13175. This action proposes to populations. This action is not subject
and minor permit modification criteria, approve specific citations that to Executive Order 12898 because it
and permit reopening criteria. Further, incorporate notification requirements to proposes to approve specific citations
this action proposes to disapprove government entities consistent with that incorporate notification
specific submitted revisions regarding federal law, significant and minor requirements to government entities
discretionary public notice and upset permit modification criteria, and permit
consistent with federal law, significant
that are not consistent with federal laws reopening criteria. This action proposes
and minor permit modification criteria,
for the regulation and permitting of air to disapprove submitted revisions
and permit reopening criteria. This
emission sources. regarding discretionary public notice
and upset exemptions that are no longer action proposes to disapprove submitted
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) consistent with federal law for the revisions regarding discretionary public
I certify that this action will not have regulation and permitting of air notice and upset exemptions that are no
a significant economic impact on a emission sources. There are no longer consistent with federal law for
substantial number of small entities requirements or responsibilities added the regulation and permitting of air
under the RFA. This action will not or removed from Indian Tribal emission sources.
impose any requirements on small Governments. Thus, Executive Order List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
entities. This action proposes to approve 13175 does not apply to this action.
regulatory citations that incorporate Environmental protection, Air
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
notification requirements to government pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Children From Environmental Health
entities consistent with federal law, Incorporation by reference,
Risks and Safety Risks
significant and minor permit Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
modification criteria, and permit EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
reopening criteria. This action proposes as applying only to those regulatory
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
to disapprove revisions regarding actions that concern environmental
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
discretionary public notice and an health or safety risks that the EPA has
reason to believe may organic compounds.
exemption of upsets from permitting
requirements that are no longer disproportionately affect children, per Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
consistent with federal law for the the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory Dated: November 16, 2016.
regulation and permitting of air action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Ron Curry,
emission sources. Therefore it will have Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 Regional Administrator, Region 6.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
no impact on small entities.
because it proposes to approve specific [FR Doc. 2016–28003 Filed 11–21–16; 8:45 am]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act citations that incorporate notification BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
(UMRA) requirements to government entities
This action does not contain any consistent with federal law, significant
unfunded mandate as described in and minor permit modification criteria,
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does and permit reopening criteria. This
not significantly or uniquely affect small action proposes to disapprove submitted
governments. The action imposes no revisions regarding discretionary public
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Nov 21, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM 22NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_83996/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 08:29:25
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 08:29:25
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2016. | |
| Contact | Stephanie Kordzi, (214) 665-7520, [email protected] or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 83771 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR