81 FR 84491 - Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2017 Atlantic Shark Commercial Fishing Season
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 226 (November 23, 2016)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 226 (November 23, 2016)
| Page Range | 84491-84501 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28154 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 84491-84501] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28154] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 635 [Docket No. 160620545-6999-02] RIN 0648-XE696 Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2017 Atlantic Shark Commercial Fishing Season AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Final rule; fishing season notification. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule establishes the opening date for all Atlantic shark fisheries, including the fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. This final rule also establishes the quotas for the 2017 fishing season based on over- and/or underharvests experienced during 2016 and previous fishing seasons. The large coastal shark (LCS) retention limit for directed shark limited access permit holders will start at 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip in the Gulf of Mexico region and at 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip in the Atlantic region. These retention limits for directed shark limited access permit holders may decrease or increase during the year after considering the specified inseason action regulatory criteria to provide, to the extent practicable, equitable fishing opportunities for commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas. These actions could affect fishing opportunities for commercial shark fishermen in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. DATES: This rule is effective on January 1, 2017. The 2017 Atlantic commercial shark fishing season opening dates and quotas are provided in Table 1 under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. ADDRESSES: Highly Migratory Species Management Division, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gu[yacute] DuBeck or Karyl Brewster- Geisz at 301-427-8503. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Atlantic commercial shark fisheries are managed under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and its amendments are implemented by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries, the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments established, among other things, commercial shark retention limits, commercial quotas for species and management groups, accounting measures for under- and overharvests for the shark fisheries, and adaptive management measures such as flexible opening dates for the fishing season and inseason adjustments to shark trip limits, which provide management flexibility in furtherance of equitable fishing opportunities, to the extent practicable, for commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas. On August 29, 2016 (81 FR 59167), NMFS published a rule proposing the 2017 opening dates for the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries, commercial shark fishing quotas based on shark landings information reported as of July 15, 2016, and the commercial shark retention limits for each region and sub-region. The August 2016 proposed rule (81 FR 59167; August 29, 2016) for the 2017 season contains details that are not repeated here. The comment period on the proposed rule ended on September 28, 2016. During the comment period, NMFS received approximately 300 written and oral comments on the proposed rule. Those comments, along with the Agency's responses, are summarized below. As further detailed in the Response to Comments section below, after considering all the comments, NMFS is opening the fishing seasons for all shark management groups except the blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region on January 1, 2017, as proposed in the August 29, 2016, proposed rule. The blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region will open on February 1, 2017, which is a change from the proposed rule. For directed shark limited access permit holders, the blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead management groups in the entire Gulf of Mexico region will start the fishing season with a retention limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. The aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups in the Atlantic region will start the fishing season with a retention limit of 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for directed shark limited access permit holders, which is a change from the proposed rule. The retention limit for incidental shark limited access permit [[Page 84492]] holders for all regions has not changed from the proposed rule and remains at 3 LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip and a combined total of 16 small coastal sharks (SCS) and pelagic sharks, combined per trip consistent with Sec. 635.24(a)(3) and (4). This final rule serves as notification of the 2017 opening dates for the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries and 2017 quotas, based on shark landings data updated as of October 14, 2016, and considering the ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria at Sec. 635.27(b)(3). These criteria consider factors such as the available annual quotas for the current fishing season, estimated season length and average weekly catch rates from previous years, length of the season and fishermen participation in past years, impacts to accomplishing objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments, temporal variation in behavior or biology target species (e.g., seasonal distribution or abundance), impact of catch rates in one region on another, and effects of delayed season openings. This action does not establish or change the annual base commercial quotas established under the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments for any shark management group. The base quotas were established under previous actions, and any changes to those base quotas would be performed through a separate action. Rather, this action adjusts the annual commercial quotas for 2017 based on over- and/or underharvests that occurred in 2016 and previous fishing seasons, consistent with existing regulations and establishes the opening dates for the fisheries. Only the adjusted blacktip quota in the Gulf of Mexico region has changed since the proposed rule, based on updated landings information as of October 14, 2016; all other quotas remain the same as proposed. Response to Comments NMFS received approximately 300 written and oral comments on the proposed rule from fishermen, dealers, and other interested parties. All written comments can be found at http://www.regulations.gov/ by searching for RIN 0648-XE696. NMFS received approximately 10 oral comments through phone conversations or at the HMS Advisory Panel meeting on September 8, 2016. All of the oral comments are represented with the written comments below. A. LCS Management Group Comments Comment 1: NMFS received comments regarding the proposed opening dates for the western Gulf of Mexico LCS fisheries on January 1. Some commenters supported the proposed January 1 opening date for both Gulf of Mexico sub-regions, while other commenters supported a delayed western Gulf of Mexico opening date of February 1 to coincide with the religious holiday of Lent. Response: After considering public comment, NMFS has determined that changing the opening date to February 1 for the blacktip shark, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico region, in combination with the change in retention limit (see discussion in Comment 2), will promote equitable fishing opportunities throughout this region. In reaching this determination, NMFS considered, in particular, the regulatory criterion regarding the length of the season in previous years for the different species and/or management groups and whether fishermen had been able to participate in the fishery in those years (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(iii)). In 2016, NMFS opened the season on January 1 and closed it on March 12, 2016 (81 FR 12602; March 10, 2016). The State of Louisiana annually plans a state- water closure from April 1 through June 30. However, once NMFS announced that it was closing the Federal fishery, the State of Louisiana closed its waters as well, 2 weeks before its initially planned closure. Shark fishermen and dealers in the western Gulf of Mexico who were not expecting the closure did not have as much of an opportunity to fish as those few fishermen who fished earlier. Based on 2016 landings data, the majority of the shark landings from the western Gulf of Mexico region did not begin to occur until February, which is when other non-shark fisheries close. If NMFS were to open the fishery on January 1, 2017, it is likely that once again the fishery would need to close earlier than April 1 and a number of fishermen who would otherwise participate in the shark fishery based on traditional expectations would not have the opportunity. Furthermore, based on the review of the landings data, delaying the opening until February 1 will provide more equitable fishing opportunities. Thus, opening the season in February, in combination with the higher retention limit (see change discussion in Comment 2), should give all fishermen in the sub-region an equitable opportunity to harvest the quota before the state-water closure. Comment 2: NMFS received comments regarding the proposed commercial retention limit for the blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region. Specifically, some commenters from the western Gulf of Mexico sub- region preferred a retention limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip instead of the proposed 30 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. Response: NMFS has determined that the default retention limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip at the start of the season will ensure equitable fishing opportunities in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region. In the proposed rule, NMFS proposed a lower trip limit (30 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip) in order to slow the harvest level due to the potential for a reduced hammerhead shark quota based on the 2016 sub-regional overharvest and given that the Aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark quotas are linked. The lower proposed trip limit was also intended to ensure the management groups remain open until at least April 2017, which is when the State of Louisiana closes state waters to shark fishing and when that State has asked that we close Federal shark fisheries to match state regulations if quotas are limited (see the criteria listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(vii) and 635.24(a)(8)(iii)). With the change in the western Gulf of Mexico LCS fisheries opening date to February 1 (see Comment 1), and because there are no sub-regional blacktip shark, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management group quota adjustments due to overharvest, NMFS no longer believes a lower retention limit is needed to slow the harvest level to ensure the management groups will remain open until at least April 2017. Rather, NMFS will start the commercial retention limit at 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip as of February 1, 2017, which is the retention limit preferred in public comments. However, NMFS may utilize the inseason retention limit adjustment during the fishing season if needed to ensure the quotas are not harvested too quickly and the management groups remain open at least until April 2017. Comment 3: NMFS received several comments regarding the proposed opening date and retention limits for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead management groups in the Atlantic region. Regarding the opening dates, some commenters from the southern and northern part of the Atlantic region supported the proposed opening date of January 1 for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead management groups and retention limits. Some of these commenters requested that NMFS modify the retention limits on an [[Page 84493]] inseason basis to ensure the majority of the quota remains available later in the year since there are no other fisheries open in Florida at the end of the year. Other commenters suggested that NMFS delay the opening of the Atlantic region fishery until the western Gulf of Mexico LCS fisheries closes to ensure better market prices for the shark products. Additionally, comments from some of the fishermen in the southern part of the region preferred lowering the proposed retention limit of 36 to a lower retention limit of three to five LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip on January 1 with the potential for later inseason retention limit adjustments to ensure the opportunity to fish for sharks in October through December because they participate in other, non-shark fisheries at the beginning of the year and in the shark fisheries later in the year. NMFS also received comments that the LCS retention limit in the Atlantic region should stay at 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip all season long and that NMFS should not later consider increasing the retention limit to 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip since the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups quotas have not increased. Response: After considering the ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria in light of the comments, which reflected general support of the proposed opening date, NMFS has decided to open the fisheries in the Atlantic region on January 1, 2017, as proposed, but with a lower retention limit than proposed. Specifically, on January 1, 2017, the LCS fisheries in the Atlantic region will open with a retention limit of 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for directed shark limited access permit holders. NMFS has determined that a lower retention limit at the start of the season will allow NMFS to more easily and closely monitor the quota and catch rates in the beginning of the year to help ensure equitable fishing opportunities later in the year, while still allowing the majority of quota to be harvested later in the year (see the criteria listed at Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(iii)). NMFS chose 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip because that is the commercial retention limit for the fishery from October 19, 2016, through the rest of the 2016 fishing season (81 FR 72007; October 19, 2016), and would not cause additional changes in fishing practices, thus minimizing any economic or compliance issues within the fishery. Also, this change seemed a reasonable amount between that of an incidental level (3 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip) and maximum retention levels (between 36 and 55 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip). The January 1 opening date, in combination with this reduced retention limit, should allow fishermen in the southern and northern portions of the Atlantic region the opportunity to fish at the beginning of the year, while providing all fishermen in the Atlantic region fishing opportunities later in the year, when the majority of fishing occurs, as the majority of the quota should still be available. The proposed rule stated that, if it appears that the quota is being harvested too quickly to allow fishermen throughout the entire region an opportunity to fish, NMFS will consider reducing the commercial retention limit after a portion of the quota is harvested (e.g., 20 percent) and later consider raising the commercial retention limit to 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip around July 15 to allow greater fishing opportunities later in the year. After considering public comment, NMFS anticipates that it would consider increasing the commercial retention limit around July 15, 2017, as this was the date used for prior season opening dates and was the date NMFS increased the retention limit in 2016 (81 FR 44798; July 11, 2016). Regarding the request to delay the fishery in the Atlantic region until the shark fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico close, NMFS decided to not delay the LCS fisheries opening date in the Atlantic region until the western Gulf of Mexico fisheries are closed since this would not promote equitable fishing opportunities throughout the Atlantic region. In past fishing seasons, the LCS fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico have closed as early as March 17 or as late as July 17, and never on the same date year to year. Without knowing when the western or eastern Gulf of Mexico LCS fisheries will close, NMFS could not evaluate the ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)) when choosing an opening date for the Atlantic region based on the commenters' request. Thus, NMFS is not making a change in response to this comment and will open the Atlantic LCS fisheries on January 1. NMFS will consider adjusting the commercial retention limit during the season as appropriate to ensure equitable fishing opportunities. Regarding the comments that having the LCS fisheries in the Atlantic and western Gulf of Mexico regions open at the same time will impact the market prices, while NMFS considers economic impacts as required, market prices are not one of the criteria NMFS evaluates when choosing an opening date. However, in the past, the LCS fisheries in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico regions have been open at the same time, and during those times, NMFS has noticed impacts on the ex-vessel prices in either region. For example, in 2016, when both regional LCS fisheries were open in January, the ex-vessel price for Atlantic aggregated LCS was at its lowest when compared to the rest of the year, but was higher than the western Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS ex-vessel prices. Comment 4: NMFS received comments regarding the overharvest of the western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional hammerhead shark quota. Some commenters were concerned that NMFS did not propose to adjust the western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional hammerhead shark quota even though the quota was overharvested by 41 percent in 2016. Response: Based on landings through October 14, 2016, NMFS is not adjusting the western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional hammerhead shark quota in this final rule. As stated in the proposed rule, even though the reported landings in the western Gulf of Mexico exceeded the 2016 sub-regional quota, the total regional Gulf of Mexico reported landings have not exceeded the 2016 regional quota as of October 14, 2016. The regulations implemented through Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (80 FR 50073; August 18, 2015), provide that sub-regional quota overages (e.g., western Gulf of Mexico sub-region) are only deducted from the next year's quota if the total regional quota (e.g., Gulf of Mexico region) is exceeded. Thus, at this time, because the overall regional quota has not been overharvested, NMFS is not adjusting the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region quota to account for the overharvest. However, because the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region remains open at the time of this final rulemaking and quota is still available in that sub-region, NMFS expects that landings will continue to occur. If landings in the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region exceed 8.5 mt dw (18,594 lb dw) (i.e., the remainder of the total regional Gulf of Mexico quota), then NMFS will take additional action to reduce the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region quota to account for overharvests in 2018. B. General Comments Comment 5: NMFS received some comments in support of the proposed rule regulating commercial shark fishing, while other commenters [[Page 84494]] opposed the regulations that allow for increased adjusted quotas as a result of underharvest. Specifically, those in opposition were concerned with the accuracy and the potential for under reporting of shark landings. Response: As discussed in the proposed rule, shark stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring may have any underharvest carried over in the following year, up to 50 percent of the base quota (81 FR 59167; August 29, 2016). Since the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group and smoothhound shark management groups in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic regions have been determined not to be overfished and to have no overfishing occurring, available underharvest from the 2016 fishing season for these management groups may be applied to the respective 2017 quotas to the extent allowable, and NMFS is doing so in this final rule. All commercial shark landings and quotas are monitored with the HMS electronic dealer reporting system, which has been in use since January 1, 2013. This improvement in commercial quota monitoring technology and the weekly, as opposed to biweekly, reporting on paper provides more information on each dealer transaction, including a requirement of reporting all shark landings to the species level, and ensures that quotas are not exceeded. Overall, this improvement helps with monitoring of commercial landings of all shark species and with closing management groups in a more efficient and timely manner. Comment 6: NMFS received approximately 280 comments in support of more conservative shark management measures by, for example, implementing lower commercial shark fishing quotas or prohibiting all commercial shark fishing to stop shark finning. Response: These comments are outside the scope of this rulemaking because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. The quotas and general management measures were established in previous rulemakings, which were the final rules to implement Amendment 2 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (73 FR 35778, June 24, 2008; corrected on 73 FR 40658; July 15, 2008), Amendment 5a to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (78 FR 40318; July 3, 2013), Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (80 FR 50073; August 18, 2015), and Amendment 9 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (80 FR 73128; November 24, 2015). Management of the Atlantic shark fisheries is based on the best available science to achieve optimum yield while also rebuilding overfished shark stocks and preventing overfishing. NMFS currently is considering conservation and management to rebuild the dusky shark stock and prevent overfishing in Amendment 5b to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (81 FR 71672; October 18, 2016). The comment period for that rulemaking ends on December 22, 2016. Comment 7: NMFS received a comment suggesting that we change the start of the fishing year for all shark species from January to September. Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking because the fishing year is defined in the regulations as January 1 to December 31. The rule did not reanalyze the overall start date of the shark fishing year, which was established in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP. Comment 8: NMFS received a comment suggesting that we not implement these regulations until such time that adequate shark research can be accomplished. Response: Management of the Atlantic shark fisheries is based on the best available science to achieve optimum yield while preventing overfishing and to rebuild overfished shark stocks. Domestic shark stock assessments are generally conducted through the Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) process, in which NMFS participates. This process is also used by the South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Fishery Management Councils and is designed to provide transparency throughout the stock assessment process. Generally, SEDAR stock assessments have three stages (data availability, assessment models, and peer review). Meetings in these stages may be face-to-face or by webinar or conference call. All meetings are open to the public. All reports from all stages of the process are available online at http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/sedar/. The SEDAR process can take several months to over a year depending on whether the species has been assessed before, if a species needs a full review of a previous assessment, or if the assessment is more of an update to previous assessments. Because the process takes so long and because of the large number of shark stocks that need to be assessed, there are times where we have reviewed stock assessments that were completed and peer reviewed outside of the SEDAR process and have determined the assessment to be appropriate for management. We have done that for both porbeagle and scalloped hammerhead sharks. Additionally, there are some shark stocks that are assessed internationally via the process established by ICCAT. In all cases, we ensure the data and models used are appropriate, all sources of mortality are considered, and that the end result constitutes the best available science, consistent with National Standard 2 and other requirements. Comment 9: NMFS received comments asserting that sharks are worth more to eco-tourism than commercial fishermen. Response: In adjusting quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and setting opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons, NMFS considers specific regulatory criteria, including the available annual quotas for the current fishing season, estimated season length and average weekly catch rates from previous years, length of the season and fishermen participation in past years, impacts to accomplishing objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments, temporal variation in behavior or biology target species (e.g., seasonal distribution or abundance), impact of catch rates in one region on another, and effects of delayed season openings. NMFS does not consider the economic impacts of sharks to eco-tourism compared to commercial shark fishing. Such impacts are appropriately considered when establishing the base quotas. Comment 10: NMFS received a comment expressing concern about the high mercury levels in shark meat. Specifically, the commenter is concerned that NMFS still allows fishing for sharks even though the health impacts are well known about high levels of mercury in shark meat. Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. Comment 11: NMFS received comments regarding the stock status of hammerhead shark and other shark species. Some commenters requested more protective management for hammerhead sharks and other shark species due to their threatened or endangered stock status listing by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking, because [[Page 84495]] the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. NMFS published Amendment 5a on July 3, 2013 (78 FR 40318) which implemented quotas for the hammerhead shark complex, including scalloped hammerhead sharks, linked the hammerhead shark quota to the aggregated LCS quota, and established a hammerhead shark recreational minimum size limit to reduce fishing mortality and rebuild the scalloped hammerhead stock. That rulemaking addressed this issue and it is not further addressed in this rulemaking. Comment 12: NMFS received a comment requesting that NMFS implement individual fishing quotas for each of the three species of hammerhead sharks within the hammerhead shark management group. Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking, because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. The current hammerhead shark quota was established in Amendment 5a to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP based on the best available science (78 FR 40318; July 3, 2013). In that rulemaking, NMFS decided to include all hammerhead shark landings in one quota because the three hammerhead sharks are difficult to differentiate, with the most evident differences being small differences in the shape of the front of the head. Once the head has been removed and the carcass has been dressed, species identification becomes more difficult. NMFS intends to conduct stock assessments on scalloped, smooth, and great hammerhead sharks in the future, as soon as practicable given timing, resource limits, and data availability and NMFS could consider individual fishing quotas for each of the three species of hammerhead sharks in the future if warranted and supportable. Comment 13: NMFS received comments regarding state-water landings and discards of sharks with no observer coverage and fewer requirements and training than Federal fishermen. The commenters supported the need to have consistency between state, Council, and Federal regulations. Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking, because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. Many states allow landings of sharks by state-permitted fishermen. However, these fishermen must comply with the state fishing regulations, which in some cases are the same as Federal regulations or, in other cases, are more restrictive. NMFS will continue to work closely with the states to ensure consistent regulations for shark fishing, to the extent practicable. Comment 14: NMFS received comments that all quota linkages should be removed since it has contributed to underfishing for the past several years. Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking, because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. The current LCS and SCS quota linkages were implemented in the final rules for Amendment 5a and Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and NMFS is citing the rationale provided in the previous rulemakings. The issue of removing quota linkages is not being re-considered or re-addressed in this rulemaking now. As explained in those rulemakings, quota linkages were created for shark species that are in separate management groups, but that have the potential to be caught together on the same shark fishing trip (e.g. aggregated LCS and hammerhead sharks). If the quota for one management group has been harvested and the management group is closed, that species could still be caught as bycatch by fishermen targeting other shark species, possibly resulting in excess mortality and negating some of the conservation benefit of management group closures. In addition, shark quota linkages were put into place as part of the rebuilding plans for shark species that are overfished in order to reduce excess mortality of the overfished species during commercial fishing for other shark species. Thus, NMFS closes the linked shark management groups together. Comment 15: NMFS received comments requesting that we consider increasing the Federal fishery closure trigger for the shark management groups from 80 percent to greater than 90 percent to prevent quota underharvests and to promote harvesting quotas fully for the greater profitability for fishermen and for increased access to shark products for consumers. Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking, because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. The 80-percent Federal fishery closure trigger for the shark management groups was implemented in the final rule for Amendment 2 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and NMFS is citing the rationale provided in the previous rulemakings. The issue of changing this closure trigger is not being re-considered or re-addressed in this rulemaking now. As explained in Amendment 2, NMFS' goal is to allow shark fishermen to harvest the full quota without exceeding it in order to maximize economic benefits to stakeholders while achieving conservation goals, including preventing overfishing and rebuilding overfished stocks. Based on past experiences with monitoring quotas for HMS species, the 80-percent threshold works well, allowing for all or almost all of the quota to be harvested without exceeding the quota. As such, NMFS expects that, in general, the quotas would be harvested between the time that the 80-percent threshold is reached and the time that the season actually closes. In addition, NMFS must also account for late reporting by shark dealers even with the improved electronic dealer system. Closing shark fisheries when 80 percent of quotas have been harvested provides a buffer to include landings received after the reporting deadline in an attempt to avoid overharvests. Comment 16: NMFS received a comment to present all shark landings by species in addition to management group, particularly for hammerhead sharks given the listing of hammerhead sharks on Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking, because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2017 shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates and commercial retention limits for the 2017 shark seasons. NMFS presents the shark landings by species and region in the annual Stock Assessment and Fisheries Evaluation (SAFE) Report that is released in December of each year, consistent with confidentiality requirements. CITES is an international treaty designed to control and regulate international trade of certain animal and plant species that are now or potentially may be threatened with extinction and are affected by trade. Some shark [[Page 84496]] species (e.g., oceanic whitetip sharks, great, scalloped, and smooth hammerhead sharks, and porbeagle sharks) are now listed on Appendix II, which imposes strict trade monitoring and could impact the ability of dealers to sell these species to international costumers. Additionally, starting in October 2017, silky and thresher sharks will be listed on Appendix II. Due to this listing, any U.S. fishermen or dealer who wishes to export these shark products will have to obtain a CITES permit in order to export or re-export these products. Changes From the Proposed Rule NMFS made four changes to the proposed rule, as described below. 1. NMFS changed the final blacktip shark quota in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region from the 331.8 mt dw (730,803 lb dw) in the proposed rule to 331.6 mt dw (730,425 lb dw), a difference of 378 lb dw, based on updated landings through October 14, 2016. The 2017 shark season proposed rule (81 FR 59167; August 29, 2016) was based on dealer reports available through July 15, 2016. NMFS explained in the proposed rule that it would adjust the proposed quotas based on dealer reports as of mid-October or mid-November 2015. Based on updated landings data through October 14, 2016, the overall available adjustment amount for the blacktip shark management group in the western Gulf of Mexico sub- region was 100.1 mt dw (220,164 lb dw), resulting in a small reduction in the amount of quota that could be carried over to 2017. Landings information beyond October 14, 2016, was not available while NMFS was writing this rule. Any landings between October 14 and December 31, 2016, will be accounted for in the 2018 shark fisheries quotas, as appropriate. 2. NMFS changed the retention limit for directed shark limited access permit holders at the start of the commercial shark fishing season for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups in the Atlantic region from 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip to 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. As explained above, NMFS changed the retention limit after considering the ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)), public comment, and the 2016 landings data in order to promote equitable fishing opportunities throughout the Atlantic region. 3. NMFS changed the retention limit for directed shark limited access permit holders for the aggregated LCS, blacktip shark, and hammerhead shark management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico sub- region from 30 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip to 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. As explained above, NMFS changed the retention limit after considering the ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)), public comment, and the 2016 landings data in order to promote equitable fishing opportunities throughout the Gulf of Mexico region. 4. NMFS changed the fishing season opening date for the western Gulf of Mexico from January 1, to February 1, 2017. NMFS changed the opening date based upon public comments that indicated a preference for a delayed opening when market conditions would be more optimal in that sub-region. 2017 Annual Quotas This final rule adjusts the 2017 commercial quotas due to over- and/or underharvests in 2016 and previous fishing seasons, based on landings data through October 14, 2016. Based on overharvest in 2012 and 2015, NMFS had previously reduced the Atlantic blacknose shark base annual quota by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw) in 2016, 2017, and 2018. However, in 2016, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,725 lb dw). In the proposed rule for this action, NMFS noted that preliminary reported landings of blacknose sharks were at 78 percent (12.2 mt dw) of their 2016 quota levels (15.7 mt dw) in the Atlantic region. Given this large underharvest, NMFS notified the public that rather than spread out the previous years' overharvests over several years, it proposed to use the 2016 underharvest to cover the remaining 2012 and 2015 overharvest. Since NMFS received no comments on this proposal, 3.0 mt dw of the 2016 quota will be used to account for the past years' overharvests. An underharvest of 0.5 mt dw occurs in 2016 after this accounting but, pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS cannot carry forward underharvest because blacknose sharks have been declared to be overfished with overfishing occurring in the Atlantic region. Therefore, the 2017 Atlantic blacknose shark quota is equal to the annual base quota without adjustment. The 2017 annual quotas by species and management group are summarized in Table 1. Any dealer reports that are received by NMFS after October 14, 2016, will be used to adjust the 2018 quotas, if necessary. A description of the quota calculations is provided in the proposed rule and is not repeated here. Any changes are described in the ``Changes from the Proposed Rule'' section. Table 1--Annual Quotas for the Atlantic Shark Fisheries [All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. 1 mt dw = 2,204.6 lb dw] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary 2016 2017 Base annual 2017 Final annual Region or sub-region Management group 2016 annual quota landings \1\ Adjustments \2\ quota quota (A)............... (B)............... (C)............... (D)............... (D+C) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastern Gulf of Mexico.......... Blacktip Sharks... 28.9 mt dw (63,189 18.7 mt dw (41,116 10.9 mt dw (23,920 25.1 mt dw (55,439 36.0 mt dw (79,359 lb dw). lb dw). lb dw) \3\. lb dw). lb dw) Aggregated Large 85.5 mt dw 54.2 mt dw .................. 85.5 mt dw 85.5 mt dw Coastal Sharks. (188,593 lb dw). (119,592 lb dw). (188,593 lb dw). (188,593 lb dw) Hammerhead Sharks. 13.4 mt dw (29,421 6.8 mt dw (14,955 .................. 13.4 mt dw (29,421 13.4 mt dw (29,421 lb dw). lb dw). lb dw). lb dw) Western Gulf of Mexico.......... Blacktip Sharks... 266.5 mt dw 165.7 mt dw 100.1 mt dw 231.5 mt dw 331.6 mt dw (587,396 lb dw). (365,385 lb dw). (220,164 lb dw) (510,261 lb dw). (730,425 lb dw) \3\. Aggregated Large 72.0 mt dw 66.1 mt dw .................. 72.0 mt dw 72.0 mt dw Coastal Sharks. (158,724 lb dw). (145,791 lb dw). (158,724 lb dw). (158,724 lb dw) Hammerhead Sharks. 11.9 mt dw (26,301 16.8 mt dw (37,128 .................. 11.9 mt dw (23,301 11.9 mt dw (23,301 lb dw). lb dw). lb dw). lb dw) [[Page 84497]] Gulf of Mexico.................. Non-Blacknose 107.3 mt dw 60.6 mt dw .................. 112.6 mt dw 112.6 mt dw Small Coastal (236,603 lb dw). (133,648 lb dw). (248,215 lb dw). (248,215 lb dw) Sharks. Smoothhound Sharks 336.4 mt dw 0 mt dw (0 lb dw). 168.2 mt dw 336.4 mt dw 504.6 mt dw (741,627). (370,814 lb dw). (741,627). (1,112,441 lb dw) Atlantic........................ Aggregated Large 168.9 mt dw 113.2 mt dw .................. 168.9 mt dw 168.9 mt dw Coastal Sharks. (372,552 lb dw). (249,661 lb dw). (372,552 lb dw). (372,552 lb dw) Hammerhead Sharks. 27.1 mt dw (59,736 12.5 mt dw (27,542 .................. 27.1 mt dw (59,736 27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb dw). lb dw). lb dw). lb dw) Non-Blacknose 264.1 mt dw 50.7 mt dw .................. 264.1 mt dw 264.1 mt dw Small Coastal (582,333 lb dw). (111,793 lb dw). (582,333 lb dw). (582,333 lb dw) Sharks. Blacknose Sharks 15.7 mt dw (34,653 12.2 mt dw (26,928 .................. 17.2 mt dw (37,921 17.2 mt dw (37,921 (South of 34[deg] lb dw). lb dw). lb dw). lb dw) \4\ N. lat. only). Smoothhound Sharks 1,201.7 mt dw 287.4 mt dw 600.9 mt dw 1,201.7 mt dw 1,802.6 mt dw (2,647,725 lb dw). (633,605 lb dw). (1,323,862 lb dw). (2,647,725 lb dw). (3,971,587 lb dw) No regional quotas.............. Non-Sandbar LCS 50.0 mt dw 14.6 mt dw (32,167 .................. 50.0 mt dw 50.0 mt dw Research. (110,230 lb dw). lb dw). (110,230 lb dw). (110,230 lb dw) Sandbar Shark 90.7 mt dw 41.5 mt dw (91,568 .................. 90.7 mt dw 90.7 mt dw Research. (199,943 lb dw). lb dw). (199,943 lb dw). (199,943 lb dw) Blue Sharks....... 273.0 mt dw < 1.0 mt dw (< .................. 273.0 mt dw 273.0 mt dw (601,856 lb dw). 2,000 lb dw). (601,856 lb dw). (601,856 lb dw) Porbeagle Sharks.. 0 mt dw (0 lb dw). 0 mt dw (0 lb dw). .................. 1.7 mt dw (3,748 1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb dw). lb dw) Pelagic Sharks 488.0 mt dw 77.4 mt dw .................. 488.0 mt dw 488.0 mt dw Other Than (1,075,856 lb dw). (170,675 lb dw). (1,075,856 lb dw). (1,075,856 lb dw) Porbeagle or Blue. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Landings are from January 1, 2016, through October 14, 2016, and are subject to change. \2\ Underharvest adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring. Also, the underharvest adjustments cannot exceed 50 percent of the base quota. \3\ This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2016. This final rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 111.0 mt dw (244,084 lb dw). Since any underharvest would be divided based on the sub-regional quota percentage split, 10.9 mt dw (9.8 percent of the overall regional quota adjustment) is being added to the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark base quota, and 100.1 mt dw (90.2 percent of the overall regional quota adjustment) is being added to the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark base quota. \4\ Based on overharvest in 2012 and 2015, NMFS had previously reduced the Atlantic blacknose shark base annual quota by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw) in 2016, 2017, and 2018. However, in 2016, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,725 lb dw). NMFS will use the 2016 underharvest to cover the remaining overharvest amount of 3.0 mt dw (6,536 lb dw). Thus the 2017 Atlantic blacknose shark quota will be equal to base annual quota. Fishing Season Notification for the 2017 Atlantic Commercial Shark Fishing Seasons Based on the seven ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria listed in Sec. 635.27(b)(3), NMFS is opening the 2016 Atlantic commercial shark fishing seasons on January 1, 2017, except for the aggregated LCS, blacktip shark, and hammerhead shark management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region which will open on February 1, 2017 (Table 2). Regarding the LCS retention limit, as shown in Table 2, for directed shark limited access permit holders, the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management groups will start the commercial fishing season at 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip, and the Atlantic aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups will start the commercial fishing season at 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. In the Atlantic region, as described above, NMFS will closely monitor the quota at the beginning of the year. If it appears that the quota is being harvested too quickly to allow fishermen throughout the entire region an opportunity to fish (e.g., if approximately 20 percent of the quota is caught at the beginning of the year), NMFS will consider reducing the commercial retention limit, then consider raising it later in the season. Based on prior years' fishing activity, to allow greater fishing opportunities later in the year, NMFS anticipates considering raising the commercial retention limit to the default limit of 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip around July 15, 2017. Any retention limit reductions and increases will be based on consideration of the trip limit adjustment criteria at 50 CFR 635.24(a)(8). All of the shark management groups will remain open until December 31, 2017, or until NMFS determines that the fishing season landings for any shark management group has reached, or is projected to reach, 80 percent of the available quota; however, consistent with Sec. 635.28(b)(5), NMFS may close the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group before landings reach, or are expected to reach, 80 percent of the quota. Additionally, [[Page 84498]] NMFS has previously established non-linked and linked quotas; linked quotas are explicitly designed to concurrently close multiple shark management groups that are caught together to prevent incidental catch mortality from exceeding the total allowable catch. The linked and non- linked quotas are shown in Table 2. NMFS will file for publication with the Office of the Federal Register a notice of closure for that shark species, shark management group including any linked quotas, and/or region that will be effective no fewer than 5 days from date of filing. From the effective date and time of the closure until NMFS announces, via the publication of a notice in the Federal Register, that additional quota is available and the season is reopened, the fisheries for the shark species or management group are closed, even across fishing years. Table 2--Quota Linkages, Season Opening Dates, and Commercial Retention Limit by Regional or Sub-Regional Shark Management Group ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commercial retention limits for directed Season opening shark limited access Region or sub-region Management group Quota linkages dates permit holders (inseason adjustments are available) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastern Gulf of Mexico......... Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip Aggregated Large Linked........... Coastal Sharks. Hammerhead Sharks Western Gulf of Mexico......... Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... February 1, 2017. 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip Aggregated Large Linked........... Coastal Sharks. Hammerhead Sharks Gulf of Mexico................. Non-Blacknose Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. N/A Small Coastal Sharks. Atlantic....................... Aggregated Large Linked........... January 1, 2017.. 25 LCS other than Coastal Sharks. sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. [If quota is landed quickly (e.g., if approximately 20 percent of quota is caught at the beginning of the year), NMFS anticipates considering an inseason reduction (e.g., to 3 or fewer LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip), and later considering an inseason increase to 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip around July 15, 2017] Hammerhead Sharks Non-Blacknose Linked (South of January 1, 2017.. N/A Small Coastal 34 [deg]N. lat. Sharks. only). Blacknose Sharks (South of 34 [deg]N. lat. only). No regional quotas............. Non-Sandbar LCS Linked........... January 1, 2017.. N/A Research. Sandbar Shark Research. Blue Sharks...... Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. N/A Porbeagle Sharks. Pelagic Sharks Other Than Porbeagle or Blue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Classification The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that the final rule is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law. This final rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866. In compliance with section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), NMFS prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) for this final rule, which analyzed the adjustments to the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark, Gulf of Mexico smoothhound shark, and Atlantic smoothhound shark management group quotas based on underharvests from the previous fishing season(s). The FRFA analyzes the anticipated economic impacts of the final actions and any significant economic impacts on small entities. The FRFA is below. Section 604(a)(1) of the RFA requires an explanation of the purpose of the rulemaking. The purpose of this final rulemaking is, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments, to establish the 2017 Atlantic commercial shark fishing quotas, retention limits, and fishing seasons. Without this rule, the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries would close on December 31, 2016, and would not reopen until another action was taken. This final rule will be implemented according to the regulations implementing the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments. Thus, NMFS expects few, if any, economic impacts to fishermen other than those already analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments. While there may be some direct negative economic impacts associated with the opening dates for fishermen in certain areas, there could also be positive effects for other fishermen in the region. The opening [[Page 84499]] dates were chosen to allow for an equitable distribution of the available quotas among all fishermen across regions and states, to the extent practicable. Section 604(a)(2) of the RFA requires NMFS to summarize significant issues raised by the public in response to the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), provide a summary of NMFS' assessment of such issues, and provide a statement of any changes made as a result of the comments. The IRFA was done as part of the proposed rule for the 2017 Atlantic Commercial Shark Season Specifications. NMFS did not receive any comments specific to the IRFA. However, NMFS received comments related to the overall economic impacts of the proposed rule, and those comments and NMFS' assessment of and response to them are summarized above (see Comments 3 and 9 above). As described in the responses to those comments relating to the season opening dates, consistent with Sec. 635.27(b)(3), the opening date for the all of the commercial shark fisheries will be implemented as proposed (January 1, 2017), except for the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region, which will open on February 1, 2017. Section 604(a)(4) of the RFA requires NMFS to provide an estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule would apply. The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria for all major industry sectors in the United States, including fish harvesters. Provision is made under SBA's regulations for an agency to develop its own industry-specific size standards after consultation with Advocacy and an opportunity for public comment (see 13 CFR 121.903(c)). Under this provision, NMFS may establish size standards that differ from those established by the SBA Office of Size Standards, but only for use by NMFS and only for the purpose of conducting an analysis of economic effects in fulfillment of the agency's obligations under the RFA. To utilize this provision, NMFS must publish such size standards in the Federal Register (FR), which NMFS did on December 29, 2015 (80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015). In this final rule effective on July 1, 2016, NMFS established a small business size standard of $11 million in annual gross receipts for all businesses in the commercial fishing industry (NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance purposes (80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015). NMFS considers all HMS permit holders to be small entities because they had average annual receipts of less than $11 million for commercial fishing. As of October 2016, the proposed rule would apply to the approximately 223 directed commercial shark permit holders, 271 incidental commercial shark permit holders, 103 smoothhound shark permit holders, and 111 commercial shark dealers. Not all permit holders are active in the fishery in any given year. Active directed commercial shark permit holders are defined as those with valid permits that landed one shark based on HMS electronic dealer reports. Of the 494 directed and incidental commercial shark permit holders, only 40 permit holders landed sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region and only 99 landed sharks in the Atlantic region. Of the 103 smoothhound shark permit holders, only 59 permit holders landed smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic region and none landed smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region. NMFS has determined that the proposed rule would not likely affect any small governmental jurisdictions. Section 604(a)(5) of the RFA requires NMFS to describe the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the final rule, including an estimate of the classes of small entities which would be subject to the requirements of the report or record. None of the actions in this final rule would result in additional reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements beyond those already analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments. Section 604(a)(6) of the RFA requires NMFS to describe the steps taken to minimize the economic impact on small entities, consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statutes. Additionally, the RFA (5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)-(4)) lists four general categories of ``significant'' alternatives that would assist an agency in the development of significant alternatives that would accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small entities. These categories of alternatives are: (1) Establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements under the rule for such small entities; (3) use of performance rather than design standards; and (4) exemptions from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities. In order to meet the objectives of this rule, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS cannot exempt small entities or change the reporting requirements only for small entities because all the entities affected are small entities. Thus, there are no alternatives discussed that fall under the first, second, and fourth categories described above. NMFS does not know of any performance or design standards that would satisfy the aforementioned objectives of this rulemaking while, concurrently, complying with the Magnuson-Stevens Act; therefore, there are no alternatives considered under the third category. This rulemaking does not establish management measures to be implemented, but rather implements previously adopted and analyzed measures as adjustments, as specified in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments and the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the 2011 shark quota specifications rule (75 FR 76302; December 8, 2010). Thus, in this rulemaking, NMFS adjusted the base quotas established and analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments by subtracting the underharvest or adding the overharvest, as specified and allowable in existing regulations. Under current regulations (Sec. 635.27(b)(2)), all shark fisheries close on December 31 of each year, or when NMFS determines that the fishing season landings for any shark management group has reached, or is projected to reach, 80 percent of the available quota, and do not open until NMFS takes action, such as this rulemaking to re-open the fisheries. Thus, not implementing these management measures would negatively affect shark fishermen and related small entities, such as dealers, and also would not provide management flexibility in furtherance of equitable fishing opportunities, to the extent practicable, for commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas. Based on the 2015 ex-vessel price, fully harvesting the unadjusted 2017 Atlantic shark commercial baseline quotas could result in total fleet revenues of $8,265,467 (see Table 3). For the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group, NMFS will increase the baseline sub- regional quotas due to the underharvests in 2016. The increase for the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group would result in a $24,099 gain in total revenues for fishermen in that sub-region, while the increase for the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group would result in a $221,815 gain in total revenues for fishermen in that sub-region. For the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic smoothhound shark management groups, NMFS will [[Page 84500]] increase the baseline quotas due to the underharvest in 2016. This would cause a potential gain in revenue of $270,323 for the fleet in the Gulf of Mexico region and a potential gain in revenue of $965,095 for the fleet in the Atlantic region. All of these changes in gross revenues are similar to the changes in gross revenues analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments. The FRFAs for those amendments concluded that the economic impacts on these small entities are expected to be minimal. In the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments and the EA for the 2011 shark quota specifications rule, NMFS stated it would be conducting annual rulemakings and considering the potential economic impacts of adjusting the quotas for under- and overharvests at that time. Table 3--Average Ex-Vessel Prices per lb dw for Each Shark Management Group, 2015 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average ex- Average ex- Region Species vessel meat vessel fin price price ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gulf of Mexico............................. Blacktip Shark..................... $0.51 $9.95 Aggregated LCS..................... 0.55 9.96 Hammerhead Shark................... 0.61 11.98 Non-Blacknose SCS.................. 0.35 6.72 Smoothhound Shark*................. 0.65 1.58 Atlantic................................... Aggregated LCS..................... 0.80 4.73 Hammerhead Shark................... 0.65 10.25 Non-Blacknose SCS.................. 0.73 4.36 Blacknose Shark.................... 0.97 4.00 Smoothhound Shark*................. 0.65 1.58 No Region.................................. Shark Research Fishery (Aggregated 0.68 9.24 LCS). Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar 0.76 10.62 only). Blue shark......................... 0.60 2.93 Porbeagle shark.................... 1.50 2.93 Other Pelagic sharks............... 1.50 2.93 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Ex-vessel prices for smoothhound sharks come from HMS dealers who submitted landings data voluntarily before it was a requirement on March 15, 2016. For this final rule, NMFS reviewed the ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(i) through (vii) to determine when opening each fishery will provide equitable opportunities for fishermen while also considering the ecological needs of the different species. Over- and/or underharvests of 2016 and previous fishing season quotas were examined for the different species/complexes to determine the effects of the 2017 final quotas on fishermen across regional fishing areas. The potential season lengths and previous catch rates were examined to ensure that equitable fishing opportunities would be provided to fishermen. Lastly, NMFS examined the seasonal variation of the different species/complexes and the effects on fishing opportunities. In addition to these criteria, NMFS also considered other relevant factors, such as recent landings data and public comments, before arriving at the final opening dates for the 2017 Atlantic shark management groups. For the 2017 fishing season, NMFS is opening the shark management groups on January 1, 2017, except for the aggregated LCS, blacktip shark, and hammerhead shark management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region, which will open on February 1, 2017. The direct and indirect economic impacts will be neutral on a short- and long-term basis for the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark, eastern Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS, eastern Gulf of Mexico hammerhead shark, Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose shark SCS, Atlantic non- blacknose shark SCS, Atlantic blacknose shark, sandbar shark, blue shark, porbeagle shark, and pelagic shark (other than porbeagle or blue sharks) management groups, because NMFS did not change the opening dates of these fisheries from the status quo. For the aggregated LCS, blacktip shark, and hammerhead shark management groups in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region, the delayed opening to February 1, 2017, anticipates minor positive short- and long-term economic impacts, because, according to public comments, ex-vessel prices for sharks are expected to be higher at that time in that sub-region. Opening the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups in the Atlantic region on January 1 will result in short-term, direct, moderate, beneficial economic impacts, as fishermen and dealers in the southern portion of the Atlantic region will be able to fish for and sell aggregated LCS and hammerhead sharks starting in January. These fishermen will be able to fish earlier in the 2017 fishing season compared to the 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, and 2015 fishing seasons, which did not start until June or July. Based on public comment, some Atlantic fishermen in the southern and northern part of the region prefer a January 1 opening for the fishery as long as the majority of the quota is available later in the year. With the implementation of the HMS electronic reporting system in 2013, NMFS now monitors the quota on a more real-time basis compared to the paper reporting system that was in place before 2013. This ability, along with the inseason retention limit adjustment criteria in Sec. 635.24(a)(8), should allow NMFS the flexibility to further provide equitable fishing opportunities for fishermen across all regions, to the extent practicable. Depending on how quickly the quota is being harvested, NMFS will consider reducing the commercial retention limit, then consider raising it later in the season to ensure that fishermen farther north have sufficient quota for a fishery later in the 2017 fishing season. The direct impacts to shark fishermen in the Atlantic region of reducing the trip limit depend on the needed reduction in the trip limit and the timing of such a reduction. Therefore, such a reduction in the trip limit for directed shark limited access permit holders is only anticipated to have minor adverse direct economic impacts to fishermen in the short- term; long-term impacts are not anticipated as these reductions would not be permanent. [[Page 84501]] In the northern portion of the Atlantic region, a January 1 opening for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups, with inseason trip limit adjustments to ensure quota is available later in the season, will have direct, minor, beneficial economic impacts in the short-term for fishermen as they will potentially have access to the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark quotas earlier than in past seasons. Fishermen in this area have stated that, depending on the weather, some aggregated LCS species might be available to retain in January. Thus, fishermen will be able to target or retain aggregated LCS while targeting non-blacknose SCS. There will be indirect, minor, beneficial economic impacts in the short- and long-term for shark dealers and other entities that deal with shark products in this region as they will also have access to aggregated LCS products earlier than in past seasons. Thus, opening the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups in January and using inseason trip limit adjustments to ensure the fishery is open later in the year in 2017 will cause beneficial cumulative economic impacts, because it allows for a more equitable distribution of the quotas among constituents in this region, consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments. Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule, and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of this rulemaking process, NMFS has prepared a listserv summarizing fishery information and regulations for Atlantic shark fisheries for 2017. This listserv also serves as the small entity compliance guide. Copies of the compliance guide are available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: November 17, 2016. Samuel D. Rauch III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2016-28154 Filed 11-22-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 84491
■ d. Revising the last sentence of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
paragraph (l)(2). and its amendments are implemented
National Oceanic and Atmospheric by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For
The revisions read as follows:
Administration the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries,
§ 62.23 WYO companies authorized. the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
50 CFR Part 635 its amendments established, among
(a) * * * Arrangements entered into other things, commercial shark retention
by WYO companies or other insurers [Docket No. 160620545–6999–02]
limits, commercial quotas for species
under this subpart must be in the form RIN 0648–XE696 and management groups, accounting
and substance of the standard measures for under- and overharvests
arrangement, titled ‘‘Financial Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; for the shark fisheries, and adaptive
Assistance/Subsidy Arrangement.’’ Each 2017 Atlantic Shark Commercial management measures such as flexible
year, at least six months before the Fishing Season opening dates for the fishing season and
effective date of the ‘‘Financial AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries inseason adjustments to shark trip
Assistance/Subsidy Arrangement,’’ Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and limits, which provide management
FEMA must publish in the Federal Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), flexibility in furtherance of equitable
Register and make available to the WYO Commerce. fishing opportunities, to the extent
companies the terms for subscription or ACTION: Final rule; fishing season
practicable, for commercial shark
re-subscription to the ‘‘Financial notification. fishermen in all regions and areas.
Assistance/Subsidy Arrangement.’’ On August 29, 2016 (81 FR 59167),
SUMMARY: This final rule establishes the NMFS published a rule proposing the
* * * * * 2017 opening dates for the Atlantic
opening date for all Atlantic shark
(f) * * * In furtherance of this end, fisheries, including the fisheries in the commercial shark fisheries, commercial
the Federal Insurance Administrator has Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. This shark fishing quotas based on shark
established ‘‘A Plan to Maintain final rule also establishes the quotas for landings information reported as of July
Financial Control for Business Written the 2017 fishing season based on over- 15, 2016, and the commercial shark
Under the Write Your Own Program.’’ and/or underharvests experienced retention limits for each region and sub-
during 2016 and previous fishing region. The August 2016 proposed rule
* * * * *
seasons. The large coastal shark (LCS) (81 FR 59167; August 29, 2016) for the
(i) * * * retention limit for directed shark limited 2017 season contains details that are not
(1) WYO companies will adjust claims access permit holders will start at 45 repeated here. The comment period on
in accordance with general company LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip the proposed rule ended on September
standards, guided by NFIP Claims in the Gulf of Mexico region and at 25 28, 2016.
manuals. The Arrangement provides LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip During the comment period, NMFS
that claim adjustments shall be binding in the Atlantic region. These retention received approximately 300 written and
limits for directed shark limited access oral comments on the proposed rule.
upon the FIA.
permit holders may decrease or increase Those comments, along with the
* * * * * Agency’s responses, are summarized
during the year after considering the
(l) * * * specified inseason action regulatory below. As further detailed in the
(2) * * * Participating WYO criteria to provide, to the extent Response to Comments section below,
practicable, equitable fishing after considering all the comments,
companies must also maintain evidence
opportunities for commercial shark NMFS is opening the fishing seasons for
of compliance with paragraph (l)(3) of
fishermen in all regions and areas. all shark management groups except the
this section for review during the audits blacktip, aggregated LCS, and
and reviews required by the WYO These actions could affect fishing
opportunities for commercial shark hammerhead shark management groups
Financial Control Plan. in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-
fishermen in the northwestern Atlantic
* * * * * region on January 1, 2017, as proposed
Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico
in the August 29, 2016, proposed rule.
Appendix A to Part 62 [Removed] and Caribbean Sea.
The blacktip, aggregated LCS, and
DATES: This rule is effective on January
hammerhead shark management groups
■ 3. Remove Appendix A to Part 62. 1, 2017. The 2017 Atlantic commercial in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-
shark fishing season opening dates and region will open on February 1, 2017,
Appendix B to Part 62 [Removed]
quotas are provided in Table 1 under which is a change from the proposed
■ 4. Remove Appendix B to Part 62. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. rule. For directed shark limited access
ADDRESSES: Highly Migratory Species permit holders, the blacktip, aggregated
Dated: November 17, 2016. Management Division, 1315 East-West LCS, and hammerhead management
W. Craig Fugate, Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. groups in the entire Gulf of Mexico
Administrator, Federal Emergency FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guý region will start the fishing season with
Management Agency. DuBeck or Karyl Brewster-Geisz at 301– a retention limit of 45 LCS other than
[FR Doc. 2016–28224 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am] 427–8503. sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. The
BILLING CODE 9110–11–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark
management groups in the Atlantic
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Background region will start the fishing season with
The Atlantic commercial shark a retention limit of 25 LCS other than
fisheries are managed under the sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens directed shark limited access permit
Fishery Conservation and Management holders, which is a change from the
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006 proposed rule. The retention limit for
Consolidated Highly Migratory Species incidental shark limited access permit
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Nov 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_84717/page/1.svg)
![84496 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
species (e.g., oceanic whitetip sharks, be accounted for in the 2018 shark underharvests in 2016 and previous
great, scalloped, and smooth fisheries quotas, as appropriate. fishing seasons, based on landings data
hammerhead sharks, and porbeagle 2. NMFS changed the retention limit through October 14, 2016. Based on
sharks) are now listed on Appendix II, for directed shark limited access permit overharvest in 2012 and 2015, NMFS
which imposes strict trade monitoring holders at the start of the commercial had previously reduced the Atlantic
and could impact the ability of dealers shark fishing season for the aggregated blacknose shark base annual quota by
to sell these species to international LCS and hammerhead shark 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw) in 2016, 2017,
costumers. Additionally, starting in management groups in the Atlantic and 2018. However, in 2016, the
October 2017, silky and thresher sharks region from 36 LCS other than sandbar Atlantic blacknose shark quota was
will be listed on Appendix II. Due to sharks per vessel per trip to 25 LCS underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,725 lb
this listing, any U.S. fishermen or dealer other than sandbar sharks per vessel per dw). In the proposed rule for this action,
who wishes to export these shark trip. As explained above, NMFS NMFS noted that preliminary reported
products will have to obtain a CITES changed the retention limit after landings of blacknose sharks were at 78
permit in order to export or re-export considering the ‘‘opening commercial percent (12.2 mt dw) of their 2016 quota
these products. fishing season’’ criteria (§ 635.27(b)(3)), levels (15.7 mt dw) in the Atlantic
public comment, and the 2016 landings region. Given this large underharvest,
Changes From the Proposed Rule data in order to promote equitable NMFS notified the public that rather
NMFS made four changes to the fishing opportunities throughout the than spread out the previous years’
proposed rule, as described below. Atlantic region. overharvests over several years, it
3. NMFS changed the retention limit proposed to use the 2016 underharvest
1. NMFS changed the final blacktip for directed shark limited access permit
shark quota in the western Gulf of to cover the remaining 2012 and 2015
holders for the aggregated LCS, blacktip overharvest. Since NMFS received no
Mexico sub-region from the 331.8 mt dw shark, and hammerhead shark
(730,803 lb dw) in the proposed rule to comments on this proposal, 3.0 mt dw
management groups in the western Gulf of the 2016 quota will be used to
331.6 mt dw (730,425 lb dw), a of Mexico sub-region from 30 LCS other
difference of 378 lb dw, based on account for the past years’ overharvests.
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip An underharvest of 0.5 mt dw occurs in
updated landings through October 14, to 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
2016. The 2017 shark season proposed 2016 after this accounting but, pursuant
vessel per trip. As explained above, to § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS cannot carry
rule (81 FR 59167; August 29, 2016) was NMFS changed the retention limit after
based on dealer reports available forward underharvest because blacknose
considering the ‘‘opening commercial sharks have been declared to be
through July 15, 2016. NMFS explained fishing season’’ criteria (§ 635.27(b)(3)),
in the proposed rule that it would adjust overfished with overfishing occurring in
public comment, and the 2016 landings the Atlantic region. Therefore, the 2017
the proposed quotas based on dealer data in order to promote equitable
reports as of mid-October or mid- Atlantic blacknose shark quota is equal
fishing opportunities throughout the to the annual base quota without
November 2015. Based on updated Gulf of Mexico region.
landings data through October 14, 2016, adjustment.
4. NMFS changed the fishing season
the overall available adjustment amount opening date for the western Gulf of The 2017 annual quotas by species
for the blacktip shark management Mexico from January 1, to February 1, and management group are summarized
group in the western Gulf of Mexico 2017. NMFS changed the opening date in Table 1. Any dealer reports that are
sub-region was 100.1 mt dw (220,164 lb based upon public comments that received by NMFS after October 14,
dw), resulting in a small reduction in indicated a preference for a delayed 2016, will be used to adjust the 2018
the amount of quota that could be opening when market conditions would quotas, if necessary. A description of the
carried over to 2017. Landings be more optimal in that sub-region. quota calculations is provided in the
information beyond October 14, 2016, proposed rule and is not repeated here.
was not available while NMFS was 2017 Annual Quotas Any changes are described in the
writing this rule. Any landings between This final rule adjusts the 2017 ‘‘Changes from the Proposed Rule’’
October 14 and December 31, 2016, will commercial quotas due to over- and/or section.
TABLE 1—ANNUAL QUOTAS FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK FISHERIES
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. 1 mt dw = 2,204.6 lb dw]
Preliminary 2017 2017
Region or Management 2016 Adjustments 2
2016 Base annual Final annual
sub-region group annual quota landings 1 quota quota
(A) (B) (C) (D) (D+C)
Eastern Gulf of Blacktip Sharks ... 28.9 mt dw 18.7 mt dw 10.9 mt dw 25.1 mt dw 36.0 mt dw
Mexico. (63,189 lb dw). (41,116 lb dw). (23,920 lb dw) 3. (55,439 lb dw). (79,359 lb dw)
Aggregated Large 85.5 mt dw 54.2 mt dw ............................. 85.5 mt dw 85.5 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (188,593 lb dw). (119,592 lb dw). (188,593 lb dw). (188,593 lb dw)
Hammerhead 13.4 mt dw 6.8 mt dw (14,955 ............................. 13.4 mt dw 13.4 mt dw
Sharks. (29,421 lb dw). lb dw). (29,421 lb dw). (29,421 lb dw)
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Western Gulf of Blacktip Sharks ... 266.5 mt dw 165.7 mt dw 100.1 mt dw 231.5 mt dw 331.6 mt dw
Mexico. (587,396 lb dw). (365,385 lb dw). (220,164 lb (510,261 lb dw). (730,425 lb dw)
dw) 3.
Aggregated Large 72.0 mt dw 66.1 mt dw ............................. 72.0 mt dw 72.0 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (158,724 lb dw). (145,791 lb dw). (158,724 lb dw). (158,724 lb dw)
Hammerhead 11.9 mt dw 16.8 mt dw ............................. 11.9 mt dw 11.9 mt dw
Sharks. (26,301 lb dw). (37,128 lb dw). (23,301 lb dw). (23,301 lb dw)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Nov 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_84717/page/6.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 84497
TABLE 1—ANNUAL QUOTAS FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK FISHERIES—Continued
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. 1 mt dw = 2,204.6 lb dw]
Preliminary 2017 2017
Region or Management 2016 Adjustments 2
2016 Base annual Final annual
sub-region group annual quota landings 1 quota quota
(A) (B) (C) (D) (D+C)
Gulf of Mexico ........ Non-Blacknose 107.3 mt dw 60.6 mt dw ............................. 112.6 mt dw 112.6 mt dw
Small Coastal (236,603 lb dw). (133,648 lb dw). (248,215 lb dw). (248,215 lb dw)
Sharks.
Smoothhound 336.4 mt dw 0 mt dw (0 lb dw) 168.2 mt dw 336.4 mt dw 504.6 mt dw
Sharks. (741,627). (370,814 lb dw). (741,627). (1,112,441 lb
dw)
Atlantic ................... Aggregated Large 168.9 mt dw 113.2 mt dw ............................. 168.9 mt dw 168.9 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (372,552 lb dw). (249,661 lb dw). (372,552 lb dw). (372,552 lb dw)
Hammerhead 27.1 mt dw 12.5 mt dw ............................. 27.1 mt dw 27.1 mt dw
Sharks. (59,736 lb dw). (27,542 lb dw). (59,736 lb dw). (59,736 lb dw)
Non-Blacknose 264.1 mt dw 50.7 mt dw ............................. 264.1 mt dw 264.1 mt dw
Small Coastal (582,333 lb dw). (111,793 lb dw). (582,333 lb dw). (582,333 lb dw)
Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks 15.7 mt dw 12.2 mt dw ............................. 17.2 mt dw 17.2 mt dw
(South of 34° N. (34,653 lb dw). (26,928 lb dw). (37,921 lb dw). (37,921 lb dw) 4
lat. only).
Smoothhound 1,201.7 mt dw 287.4 mt dw 600.9 mt dw 1,201.7 mt dw 1,802.6 mt dw
Sharks. (2,647,725 lb (633,605 lb dw). (1,323,862 lb (2,647,725 lb (3,971,587 lb
dw). dw). dw). dw)
No regional quotas Non-Sandbar LCS 50.0 mt dw 14.6 mt dw ............................. 50.0 mt dw 50.0 mt dw
Research. (110,230 lb dw). (32,167 lb dw). (110,230 lb dw). (110,230 lb dw)
Sandbar Shark 90.7 mt dw 41.5 mt dw ............................. 90.7 mt dw 90.7 mt dw
Research. (199,943 lb dw). (91,568 lb dw). (199,943 lb dw). (199,943 lb dw)
Blue Sharks ......... 273.0 mt dw < 1.0 mt dw (< ............................. 273.0 mt dw 273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb dw). 2,000 lb dw). (601,856 lb dw). (601,856 lb dw)
Porbeagle Sharks 0 mt dw (0 lb dw) 0 mt dw (0 lb dw) ............................. 1.7 mt dw (3,748 1.7 mt dw (3,748
lb dw). lb dw)
Pelagic Sharks 488.0 mt dw 77.4 mt dw ............................. 488.0 mt dw 488.0 mt dw
Other Than (1,075,856 lb (170,675 lb dw). (1,075,856 lb (1,075,856 lb
Porbeagle or dw). dw). dw)
Blue.
1 Landings are from January 1, 2016, through October 14, 2016, and are subject to change.
2 Underharvest adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring.
Also, the underharvest adjustments cannot exceed 50 percent of the base quota.
3 This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2016. This final rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 111.0 mt
dw (244,084 lb dw). Since any underharvest would be divided based on the sub-regional quota percentage split, 10.9 mt dw (9.8 percent of the
overall regional quota adjustment) is being added to the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark base quota, and 100.1 mt dw (90.2 percent of the
overall regional quota adjustment) is being added to the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark base quota.
4 Based on overharvest in 2012 and 2015, NMFS had previously reduced the Atlantic blacknose shark base annual quota by 1.5 mt dw (3,268
lb dw) in 2016, 2017, and 2018. However, in 2016, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,725 lb dw). NMFS
will use the 2016 underharvest to cover the remaining overharvest amount of 3.0 mt dw (6,536 lb dw). Thus the 2017 Atlantic blacknose shark
quota will be equal to base annual quota.
Fishing Season Notification for the 2017 other than sandbar sharks per vessel per considering raising the commercial
Atlantic Commercial Shark Fishing trip, and the Atlantic aggregated LCS retention limit to the default limit of 36
Seasons and hammerhead shark management LCS other than sandbar sharks per
Based on the seven ‘‘opening groups will start the commercial fishing vessel per trip around July 15, 2017.
commercial fishing season’’ criteria season at 25 LCS other than sandbar Any retention limit reductions and
listed in § 635.27(b)(3), NMFS is sharks per vessel per trip. In the increases will be based on consideration
opening the 2016 Atlantic commercial Atlantic region, as described above, of the trip limit adjustment criteria at 50
shark fishing seasons on January 1, NMFS will closely monitor the quota at CFR 635.24(a)(8).
2017, except for the aggregated LCS, the beginning of the year. If it appears All of the shark management groups
blacktip shark, and hammerhead shark that the quota is being harvested too will remain open until December 31,
management groups in the western Gulf quickly to allow fishermen throughout 2017, or until NMFS determines that the
of Mexico sub-region which will open the entire region an opportunity to fish fishing season landings for any shark
on February 1, 2017 (Table 2). (e.g., if approximately 20 percent of the management group has reached, or is
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Regarding the LCS retention limit, as quota is caught at the beginning of the projected to reach, 80 percent of the
shown in Table 2, for directed shark year), NMFS will consider reducing the available quota; however, consistent
limited access permit holders, the Gulf commercial retention limit, then with § 635.28(b)(5), NMFS may close the
of Mexico blacktip shark, aggregated consider raising it later in the season. Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
LCS, and hammerhead shark Based on prior years’ fishing activity, to management group before landings
management groups will start the allow greater fishing opportunities later reach, or are expected to reach, 80
commercial fishing season at 45 LCS in the year, NMFS anticipates percent of the quota. Additionally,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Nov 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_84717/page/7.svg)
![84498 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS has previously established non- in Table 2. NMFS will file for until NMFS announces, via the
linked and linked quotas; linked quotas publication with the Office of the publication of a notice in the Federal
are explicitly designed to concurrently Federal Register a notice of closure for Register, that additional quota is
close multiple shark management that shark species, shark management available and the season is reopened,
groups that are caught together to group including any linked quotas, and/ the fisheries for the shark species or
prevent incidental catch mortality from or region that will be effective no fewer management group are closed, even
exceeding the total allowable catch. The than 5 days from date of filing. From the across fishing years.
linked and non-linked quotas are shown effective date and time of the closure
TABLE 2—QUOTA LINKAGES, SEASON OPENING DATES, AND COMMERCIAL RETENTION LIMIT BY REGIONAL OR SUB-
REGIONAL SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP
Commercial retention limits for directed
Region or sub-region Management group Quota linkages Season opening dates shark limited access permit holders
(inseason adjustments are available)
Eastern Gulf of Mex- Blacktip Sharks .......... Not Linked .................. January 1, 2017 ......... 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per ves-
ico. sel per trip
Aggregated Large Linked.
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks.
Western Gulf of Mex- Blacktip Sharks .......... Not Linked .................. February 1, 2017 ....... 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per ves-
ico. sel per trip
Aggregated Large Linked.
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks.
Gulf of Mexico ............ Non-Blacknose Small Not Linked .................. January 1, 2017 ......... N/A
Coastal Sharks.
Atlantic ....................... Aggregated Large Linked ........................ January 1, 2017 ......... 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per ves-
Coastal Sharks. sel per trip. [If quota is landed quickly
(e.g., if approximately 20 percent of quota
is caught at the beginning of the year),
NMFS anticipates considering an inseason
reduction (e.g., to 3 or fewer LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip),
and later considering an inseason increase
to 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip around July 15, 2017]
Hammerhead Sharks.
Non-Blacknose Small Linked (South of 34 January 1, 2017 ......... N/A
Coastal Sharks. °N. lat. only).
Blacknose Sharks
(South of 34 °N. lat.
only).
No regional quotas .... Non-Sandbar LCS Re- Linked ........................ January 1, 2017 ......... N/A
search.
Sandbar Shark Re-
search.
Blue Sharks ............... Not Linked .................. January 1, 2017 ......... N/A
Porbeagle Sharks.
Pelagic Sharks Other
Than Porbeagle or
Blue.
Classification management group quotas based on commercial shark fisheries would close
The NMFS Assistant Administrator underharvests from the previous fishing on December 31, 2016, and would not
has determined that the final rule is season(s). The FRFA analyzes the reopen until another action was taken.
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated anticipated economic impacts of the This final rule will be implemented
HMS FMP and its amendments, other final actions and any significant according to the regulations
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens economic impacts on small entities. The implementing the 2006 Consolidated
Act, and other applicable law. FRFA is below. HMS FMP and its amendments. Thus,
This final rule is exempt from review Section 604(a)(1) of the RFA requires NMFS expects few, if any, economic
under Executive Order 12866. an explanation of the purpose of the impacts to fishermen other than those
In compliance with section 604 of the rulemaking. The purpose of this final already analyzed in the 2006
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), NMFS rulemaking is, consistent with the Consolidated HMS FMP and its
prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006 amendments. While there may be some
Analysis (FRFA) for this final rule, Consolidated HMS FMP and its direct negative economic impacts
which analyzed the adjustments to the amendments, to establish the 2017 associated with the opening dates for
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark, Gulf of Atlantic commercial shark fishing fishermen in certain areas, there could
Mexico smoothhound shark, and quotas, retention limits, and fishing also be positive effects for other
Atlantic smoothhound shark seasons. Without this rule, the Atlantic fishermen in the region. The opening
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Nov 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_84717/page/8.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 84501
In the northern portion of the Atlantic DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et seq., and the Atlantic Tunas
region, a January 1 opening for the Convention Act (ATCA), 16 U.S.C. 971
aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark National Oceanic and Atmospheric et seq. ATCA authorizes the Secretary of
management groups, with inseason trip Administration Commerce (Secretary) to promulgate
limit adjustments to ensure quota is regulations, as may be necessary and
available later in the season, will have 50 CFR Part 635 appropriate, to implement
direct, minor, beneficial economic recommendations of the International
[Docket No. 160531477–6999–02]
impacts in the short-term for fishermen Commission for the Conservation of
as they will potentially have access to RIN 0648–BG10 Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT).
the aggregated LCS and hammerhead Background
shark quotas earlier than in past Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Removal of Vessel Upgrade This final rule removes vessel
seasons. Fishermen in this area have upgrading restrictions for vessels issued
Restrictions for Swordfish Directed
stated that, depending on the weather, swordfish directed and Atlantic tunas
Limited Access and Atlantic Tunas
some aggregated LCS species might be Longline category LAPs. A brief
Longline Category Permits
available to retain in January. Thus, summary of the background of this final
fishermen will be able to target or retain AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries rule is provided below. The details were
aggregated LCS while targeting non- Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and described in the proposed rule for this
blacknose SCS. There will be indirect, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), action (81 FR 48731, July 26, 2016) and
minor, beneficial economic impacts in Commerce. are not repeated here. Additional
the short- and long-term for shark ACTION: Final rule. information regarding Atlantic HMS
dealers and other entities that deal with management can be found in the 2006
shark products in this region as they SUMMARY: This final rule removes vessel Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
will also have access to aggregated LCS upgrading restrictions for vessels issued amendments, the annual HMS Stock
products earlier than in past seasons. swordfish directed and Atlantic tunas Assessment and Fishery Evaluation
Thus, opening the aggregated LCS and Longline category limited access (SAFE) Reports, and online at http://
hammerhead shark management groups permits (LAPs). Currently, regulations www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/. The
in January and using inseason trip limit allow for upgrading vessels or comments received on the proposed
adjustments to ensure the fishery is transferring permits to another vessel rule for this action, and NMFS’
only if the vessel upgrade or permit responses to those comments, are
open later in the year in 2017 will cause
transfer results in an increase of no summarized below in the section
beneficial cumulative economic
more than 35 percent in length overall, labeled ‘‘Response to Comments.’’
impacts, because it allows for a more
gross registered tonnage, and net In 1999, NMFS issued initial LAPs in
equitable distribution of the quotas
tonnage, as measured relative to the the Atlantic swordfish and shark
among constituents in this region, baseline vessel specifications (i.e., the fisheries (64 FR 29090, March 28, 1999).
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated specifications of the vessel first issued To be eligible to fish with pelagic
HMS FMP and its amendments. a Highly Migratory Species (HMS) LAP). longline gear, a vessel had to be issued
Section 212 of the Small Business This final rule eliminates these a swordfish directed or incidental LAP,
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of restrictions on upgrades and permit a shark directed or incidental LAP, and
1996 states that, for each rule or group transfers. This action affects vessel an Atlantic tunas Longline category
of related rules for which an agency is owners issued swordfish directed and permit. After initial issuance of these
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency Atlantic tunas Longline category LAPs permits, no new permits were issued by
shall publish one or more guides to and fishing in the Atlantic Ocean, NMFS, but permits could be transferred
assist small entities in complying with including the Gulf of Mexico and to other vessels. Swordfish and shark
the rule, and shall designate such Caribbean Sea. directed LAPs included restrictions on
publications as ‘‘small entity DATES: This rule is effective on vessel upgrading and permit transfers.
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall December 23, 2016. Vessel upgrades and permit transfers
explain the actions a small entity is were allowed only if the upgrade or
ADDRESSES: Other documents relevant
required to take to comply with a rule permit transfer to another vessel did not
to this final rule are available from the
or group of rules. As part of this result in an increase in horsepower of
Atlantic HMS Management Division
more than 20 percent or an increase of
rulemaking process, NMFS has prepared Web site at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ more than 10 percent in length overall,
a listserv summarizing fishery sfa/hms/ or by contacting Steve Durkee gross registered tonnage, or net tonnage
information and regulations for Atlantic by phone at 202–670–6637 or Rick relative to the respective specifications
shark fisheries for 2017. This listserv Pearson by phone at 727–824–5399. of the first vessel issued the initial LAP
also serves as the small entity FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (the baseline vessel). Additionally,
compliance guide. Copies of the Steve Durkee by phone at 202–670–6637 vessels could only be upgraded one
compliance guide are available from or Rick Pearson by phone at 727–824– time. These vessel upgrading
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). 5399. restrictions were put into place to limit
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. capacity in the swordfish fishery.
1801 et seq. Atlantic swordfish and tuna fisheries Incidental LAPs for these species did
are managed under the 2006 not have vessel upgrading restrictions.
Dated: November 17, 2016.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Consolidated HMS Fishery Management Upgrading restrictions for Atlantic tunas
Samuel D. Rauch III, Plan (FMP) and its amendments. Longline category LAPs were not
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Implementing regulations at 50 CFR part explicitly implemented in the 1999 rule.
Regulatory Programs, National Marine 635 are issued under the authority of the However, as a practical effect, Atlantic
Fisheries Service. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery tunas Longline category LAPs were
[FR Doc. 2016–28154 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am] Conservation and Management Act limited by the same upgrading
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801 restrictions as the swordfish and shark
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Nov 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_84717/page/11.svg)
Document Created: 2016-11-23 05:30:26
Document Modified: 2016-11-23 05:30:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule; fishing season notification. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on January 1, 2017. The 2017 Atlantic commercial shark fishing season opening dates and quotas are provided in Table 1 under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. | |
| Contact | Gu[yacute] DuBeck or Karyl Brewster- Geisz at 301-427-8503. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 84491 | |
| RIN Number | 0648-XE69 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR