81_FR_84827 81 FR 84601 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request

81 FR 84601 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 226 (November 23, 2016)

Page Range84601-84603
FR Document2016-28211

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84601-84603]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

    In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed 
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of 
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects 
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the 
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of 
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.

Proposed Project: Evaluation of the Cooperative Agreements to Benefit 
Homeless Individuals (CABHI) Program (OMB No. 0930-0339)--REVISION

    SAMHSA is conducting a cross-site evaluation of the FY2016 cohort 
of the CABHI grant program. The CABHI Evaluation builds on a previous 
evaluation of SAMHSA's 2009-2012 homeless services grant programs 
(i.e., Grants for the Benefit of Homeless Individuals, Services in 
Supportive Housing, and CABHI), under which the approved data 
collection tools were developed and implemented. SAMHSA is requesting 
approval from OMB to revise the burden inventory, which has been 
calculated based on the number of FY2016 CABHI grantees, and to modify

[[Page 84602]]

the data collection mode of a project director interview.
    In 2016, SAMHSA awarded 30 CABHI grants across three levels: States 
(up to $1.5 million per year), Local Governments (up to $800,000 per 
year), and Communities (up to $400,000 per year). The grantees are 
united by the goal of enhancing and expanding infrastructure and 
capacity for mental health and substance abuse treatment and related 
support services for individuals experiencing chronic homelessness or 
veterans, families, or youth experiencing homelessness as a result of 
these conditions. This is accomplished through the provision of 
permanent supportive housing, behavioral health treatment, and recovery 
support services, and enrollment in health insurance, Medicaid, or 
other mainstream benefit programs.
    The primary task of the CABHI evaluation is to conduct a 
comprehensive process and outcome evaluation, addressing questions 
related to the implementation of the CABHI grant projects and the 
extent to which they were able to meet the program's goals. Process 
evaluation primarily represents what is done to and for the client 
(e.g., services provided); this aspect of the evaluation will also 
include a focus on structure, or the resources available in the service 
delivery system, which represent the capacity to deliver quality care, 
but not the care itself. The outcome evaluation will focus on outputs, 
which are the most immediate or proximal results of project activities 
(e.g., changes in partner collaboration, the number of clients enrolled 
in mainstream benefits), and client outcomes, particularly those 
related to behavioral health and homelessness and housing instability. 
The data collection tools included in this request collect a wide range 
of quantitative and qualitative data on characteristics of the grantee 
organization and its partnerships; the system within which the project 
is embedded; relationships with stakeholders; characteristics of the 
target population; services received, including implementation of EBPs; 
staffing patterns; costs of services; barriers and facilitators of 
project implementation; and project sustainability efforts. Data 
collection efforts that will support the evaluation are described 
below.
    The Project Director (PD) Phone Interview/Web Survey is designed to 
systematically collect key grant project characteristics which will 
directly inform the process evaluation component and will also provide 
essential data by documenting the partnerships and services each 
grantee includes in their project. The interview includes two 
components, a semi-structured telephone interview and a Web survey, 
which represents a change from the original approval. The interview was 
developed to be conducted as a telephone interview; however, some 
sections are better suited for self-administration through a Web-based 
survey (e.g., reporting which services the project is providing to 
clients) and the instrument has been modified accordingly. The PD Phone 
Interview/Web Survey is composed of the following sections: Grantee 
Agency and Project Characteristics, Target Population, Stakeholders/
Partners, Services, Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs), Housing, Project 
Organization and Implementation, Sustainability, Local Evaluation, 
Technical Assistance, and Lessons Learned. A total of 39 respondents 
are expected to complete the PD Phone Interview/Web Survey; this 
includes one respondent from all of the CABHI grantees (n=30) and the 
State sub-recipients (n=9). This data collection will occur one time 
during Year 1 and one time during Year 3 of the evaluation.
    Site Visits will consist of in-person, semi-structured discussions 
with grant project directors, State sub-recipient coordinators, project 
evaluators, financial staff, behavioral health treatment staff, case 
managers, housing providers, other support services staff, primary 
partner staff and other key stakeholders, and project client 
participants. The purpose of the Site Visits is to collect detailed 
qualitative information and economic data on project activities 
conducted by the grantees and their partners, which will directly 
inform the process evaluation. The qualitative data will also provide 
essential information for the outcome evaluation component by 
documenting the interventions provided to clients and the 
implementation, barriers, facilitators, challenges and successes for 
each grant project visited. Each CABHI grant project (n=30) will be 
visited once during Year 2 and once during Year 3 of the evaluation. No 
changes have been made to the Site Visit instruments.
    The EBP Self-Assessment is a Web-based survey designed to collect 
information on the services implemented in CABHI grant projects that 
have a demonstrable evidence base, providing a description of the EBP 
interventions received by project clients. The EBP Self-Assessment tool 
is divided into two parts. Part 1 collects information on general 
implementation of the projects' primary EBPs (i.e., those received by 
the most project clients). Thirty-six respondents (9 State sub-
recipients, 12 Local Governments, and 15 Communities) are expected to 
complete Part 1 of the EBP Self-Assessment, which may be completed up 
to 3 times based on the number of primary EBPs being implemented by the 
project. Part 2 collects detailed implementation data on a selected 
group of EBPs (i.e., Assertive Community Treatment, Integrated Dual 
Disorders Treatment, Illness Management and Recovery, Supported 
Employment, Critical Time Intervention, and Supplemental Security 
Income [SSI]/Social Security Disability Insurance [SSDI] Outreach, 
Access, and Recovery) and will be administered only to projects using 
the selected EBPs and only for the EBPs they are implementing. Thirty-
six respondents (9 State sub-recipients, 12 Local Governments, and 15 
Communities) are expected to complete Part 2 of the EBP Self-
Assessment, which may be completed up to 3 times based on the number of 
Part 2 EBPs being implemented by the project. Respondents for both Part 
1 and 2 may include grant project directors, State sub-recipient 
coordinators, or other staff knowledgeable about the project's EBPs. 
The EBP Self-Assessment will be administered in Year 2 of the 
evaluation. No changes have been made to the EBP Self-Assessment 
instrument.
    The Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) Self-Assessment is a Web-
based survey completed by the CABHI grant projects to understand the 
extent to which they are implementing key dimensions of PSH and capture 
the variability of the PSH model among the projects. Information is 
collected on the following dimensions: Choice of housing, separation of 
housing and services; decent, safe, and affordable housing; housing 
integration; tenancy rights; access to housing; flexible, voluntary 
services; service philosophy; and team-based behavioral health. Thirty-
six respondents (9 State sub-recipients, 12 Local Governments, and 15 
Communities) are expected to complete the PSH Self-Assessment one time, 
and may include grant project directors, State sub-recipient 
coordinators, or other staff knowledgeable about the project's PSH 
model. The PSH Self-Assessment will be administered in Year 2 of the 
evaluation. No changes have been made to the PSH Self-Assessment 
instrument.

[[Page 84603]]



                                             Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Number of    Responses  per   Total  number     Hours per     Total  burden
       Instrument/activity          respondents      respondent    of  responses     response          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PD Phone Interview/Web Survey...              39               1              39             2.1              82
Site Visits:
    Opening Session/Project              \a\ 300               1             300             2.5             750
     Director Interview.........
    Case Manager, Treatment,             \b\ 540               1             540               2           1,080
     Housing Staff/Provider
     Interview..................
    Stakeholder Interview.......         \c\ 270               1             270             1.5             405
    Evaluator Interview.........          \d\ 60               1              60               1              60
    Client Focus Group..........         \e\ 450               1             450             1.5             675
    Cost Interview..............          \f\ 60               1              60               2             120
Evidence-Based Practice Self-                 36               3             108            0.58              63
 Assessment Part 1..............
Evidence-Based Practice Self-                 36               3             108            0.25              27
 Assessment Part 2..............
Permanent Supportive Housing                  36               1              36            0.67              24
 Self-Assessment................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total...................       \g\ 1,650  ..............           1,971  ..............           3,286
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ 10 respondents x 30 site visits = 300 respondents.
\b\ 18 respondents x 30 site visits = 540 respondents.
\c\ 9 respondents x 30 site visits = 270 respondents.
\d\ 2 respondents x 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
\e\ 15 respondents x 30 site visits = 450 respondents.
\f\ 2 respondents x 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
\g\ This is an unduplicated count of total respondents.

    Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57-B, Rockville, MD 20857 OR email a copy to 
summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received by 
January 23, 2017.

Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016-28211 Filed 11-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4162-20-P



                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices                                                84601

                                                  Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology,                Contact Person: Kate Fothergill, Ph.D.,               Dated: November 17, 2016.
                                                  Physiology, and Biological Chemistry                    Scientific Review Officer, Center for                 Melanie J. Pantoja,
                                                  Research; 93.862, Genetics and                          Scientific Review, National Institutes of             Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
                                                  Developmental Biology Research; 93.88,                  Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3142,              Committee Policy.
                                                  Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96,             Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–2309,
                                                  Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859,                                                                         [FR Doc. 2016–28144 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          fothergillke@mail.nih.gov.
                                                  Biomedical Research and Research Training,                                                                    BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
                                                  National Institutes of Health, HHS)                       This notice is being published less than 15
                                                                                                          days prior to the meeting due to the timing
                                                    Dated: November 17, 2016.                             limitations imposed by the review and                 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                  Melanie J. Pantoja,                                     funding cycle.                                        HUMAN SERVICES
                                                  Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory               Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
                                                  Committee Policy.                                       Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member                 Substance Abuse and Mental Health
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–28149 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]            Conflict: AIDS and AIDS Related Research.             Services Administration
                                                  BILLING CODE 4140–01–P                                    Date: December 9, 2016.
                                                                                                            Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                       Agency Information Collection
                                                                                                            Agenda: To review and evaluate grant                Activities: Proposed Collection;
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                                applications.                                         Comment Request
                                                  HUMAN SERVICES                                            Place: National Institute of Health, 6701
                                                                                                          Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,                    In compliance with Section
                                                  National Institutes of Health                           (Telephone Conference Call).                          3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
                                                                                                            Contact Person: Jose H Guerrier, Ph.D.,             Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
                                                  Center for Scientific Review; Notice of                 Scientific Review Officer, Center for                 opportunity for public comment on
                                                  Closed Meetings                                         Scientific Review, National Institutes of
                                                                                                                                                                proposed collections of information, the
                                                                                                          Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5218,
                                                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the                                                                            Substance Abuse and Mental Health
                                                                                                          MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
                                                  Federal Advisory Committee Act, as                                                                            Services Administration (SAMHSA)
                                                                                                          1137, guerriej@csr.nih.gov.
                                                  amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is                                                                            will publish periodic summaries of
                                                                                                            This notice is being published less than 15         proposed projects. To request more
                                                  hereby given of the following meetings.
                                                                                                          days prior to the meeting due to the timing
                                                    The meetings will be closed to the                                                                          information on the proposed projects or
                                                                                                          limitations imposed by the review and
                                                  public in accordance with the                                                                                 to obtain a copy of the information
                                                                                                          funding cycle.
                                                  provisions set forth in sections                                                                              collection plans, call the SAMHSA
                                                  552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,              (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance             Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
                                                                                                          Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;            1243.
                                                  as amended. The grant applications and
                                                                                                          93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
                                                  the discussions could disclose                                                                                  Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
                                                                                                          93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
                                                  confidential trade secrets or commercial                                                                      the proposed collections of information
                                                                                                          93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
                                                  property such as patentable material,                   Institutes of Health, HHS).                           are necessary for the proper
                                                  and personal information concerning                                                                           performance of the functions of the
                                                  individuals associated with the grant                     Dated: November 17, 2016.                           agency, including whether the
                                                  applications, the disclosure of which                   Michelle Trout,                                       information shall have practical utility;
                                                  would constitute a clearly unwarranted                                                                        (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
                                                                                                          Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
                                                  invasion of personal privacy.                           Committee Policy.                                     of the burden of the proposed collection
                                                    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific              [FR Doc. 2016–28143 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]          of information; (c) ways to enhance the
                                                  Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
                                                                                                          BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
                                                                                                                                                                quality, utility, and clarity of the
                                                  Conflict: AIDS and Related Research.                                                                          information to be collected; and (d)
                                                    Date: December 5–6, 2016.                                                                                   ways to minimize the burden of the
                                                    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                                                                               collection of information on
                                                    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant                  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                  applications.                                           HUMAN SERVICES                                        respondents, including through the use
                                                    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701                                                                  of automated collection techniques or
                                                  Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,                    National Institutes of Health                         other forms of information technology.
                                                  (Virtual Meeting).                                                                                            Proposed Project: Evaluation of the
                                                    Contact Person: Kenneth A Roebuck, Ph.D.,             National Cancer Institute; Amended
                                                  Scientific Review Officer, Center for
                                                                                                                                                                Cooperative Agreements to Benefit
                                                                                                          Notice of Meeting
                                                  Scientific Review, National Institutes of                                                                     Homeless Individuals (CABHI) Program
                                                  Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5106,                  Notice is hereby given of a change in               (OMB No. 0930–0339)—REVISION
                                                  MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–                the meeting of the National Cancer
                                                  1166, roebuckk@csr.nih.gov.                                                                                      SAMHSA is conducting a cross-site
                                                                                                          Institute Special Emphasis Panel,                     evaluation of the FY2016 cohort of the
                                                    This notice is being published less than 15           November 18, 2016, 03:00 p.m. to
                                                  days prior to the meeting due to the timing                                                                   CABHI grant program. The CABHI
                                                                                                          November 18, 2016, 05:00 p.m.,                        Evaluation builds on a previous
                                                  limitations imposed by the review and
                                                  funding cycle.
                                                                                                          National Cancer Institute Shady Grove,                evaluation of SAMHSA’s 2009–2012
                                                    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific              9609 Medical Center Drive, 3W030,                     homeless services grant programs (i.e.,
                                                  Review Special Emphasis Panel; Social                   Rockville, MD 20850 which was                         Grants for the Benefit of Homeless
                                                  Sciences and Population Studies: Special                published in the Federal Register on                  Individuals, Services in Supportive
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Topics.                                                 October 17, 2016, 81 FR 71516.                        Housing, and CABHI), under which the
                                                    Date: December 8, 2016.                                 The meeting notice is amended to                    approved data collection tools were
                                                    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
                                                    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
                                                                                                          change the date and time from                         developed and implemented. SAMHSA
                                                  applications.                                           November 18, 2016, 3:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m.                is requesting approval from OMB to
                                                    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701            to December 15, 2016, 12:30 p.m.–2:30                 revise the burden inventory, which has
                                                  Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,                    p.m. The meeting is closed to the                     been calculated based on the number of
                                                  (Telephone Conference Call).                            public.                                               FY2016 CABHI grantees, and to modify


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:04 Nov 22, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00055   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM   23NON1


                                                  84602                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices

                                                  the data collection mode of a project                   component and will also provide                       divided into two parts. Part 1 collects
                                                  director interview.                                     essential data by documenting the                     information on general implementation
                                                     In 2016, SAMHSA awarded 30 CABHI                     partnerships and services each grantee                of the projects’ primary EBPs (i.e., those
                                                  grants across three levels: States (up to               includes in their project. The interview              received by the most project clients).
                                                  $1.5 million per year), Local                           includes two components, a semi-                      Thirty-six respondents (9 State sub-
                                                  Governments (up to $800,000 per year),                  structured telephone interview and a                  recipients, 12 Local Governments, and
                                                  and Communities (up to $400,000 per                     Web survey, which represents a change                 15 Communities) are expected to
                                                  year). The grantees are united by the                   from the original approval. The                       complete Part 1 of the EBP Self-
                                                  goal of enhancing and expanding                         interview was developed to be                         Assessment, which may be completed
                                                  infrastructure and capacity for mental                  conducted as a telephone interview;                   up to 3 times based on the number of
                                                  health and substance abuse treatment                    however, some sections are better suited              primary EBPs being implemented by the
                                                  and related support services for                        for self-administration through a Web-                project. Part 2 collects detailed
                                                  individuals experiencing chronic                        based survey (e.g., reporting which                   implementation data on a selected
                                                  homelessness or veterans, families, or                  services the project is providing to                  group of EBPs (i.e., Assertive
                                                  youth experiencing homelessness as a                    clients) and the instrument has been                  Community Treatment, Integrated Dual
                                                  result of these conditions. This is                     modified accordingly. The PD Phone                    Disorders Treatment, Illness
                                                  accomplished through the provision of                   Interview/Web Survey is composed of                   Management and Recovery, Supported
                                                  permanent supportive housing,                           the following sections: Grantee Agency                Employment, Critical Time
                                                  behavioral health treatment, and                        and Project Characteristics, Target                   Intervention, and Supplemental
                                                  recovery support services, and                          Population, Stakeholders/Partners,                    Security Income [SSI]/Social Security
                                                  enrollment in health insurance,                         Services, Evidence-Based Practices                    Disability Insurance [SSDI] Outreach,
                                                  Medicaid, or other mainstream benefit                   (EBPs), Housing, Project Organization                 Access, and Recovery) and will be
                                                  programs.                                               and Implementation, Sustainability,                   administered only to projects using the
                                                     The primary task of the CABHI                        Local Evaluation, Technical Assistance,               selected EBPs and only for the EBPs
                                                  evaluation is to conduct a                              and Lessons Learned. A total of 39                    they are implementing. Thirty-six
                                                  comprehensive process and outcome                       respondents are expected to complete                  respondents (9 State sub-recipients, 12
                                                  evaluation, addressing questions related                the PD Phone Interview/Web Survey;                    Local Governments, and 15
                                                  to the implementation of the CABHI                      this includes one respondent from all of              Communities) are expected to complete
                                                  grant projects and the extent to which                  the CABHI grantees (n=30) and the State               Part 2 of the EBP Self-Assessment,
                                                  they were able to meet the program’s                    sub-recipients (n=9). This data                       which may be completed up to 3 times
                                                  goals. Process evaluation primarily                     collection will occur one time during                 based on the number of Part 2 EBPs
                                                  represents what is done to and for the                  Year 1 and one time during Year 3 of the              being implemented by the project.
                                                  client (e.g., services provided); this                  evaluation.                                           Respondents for both Part 1 and 2 may
                                                  aspect of the evaluation will also                         Site Visits will consist of in-person,             include grant project directors, State
                                                  include a focus on structure, or the                    semi-structured discussions with grant                sub-recipient coordinators, or other staff
                                                  resources available in the service                      project directors, State sub-recipient                knowledgeable about the project’s EBPs.
                                                  delivery system, which represent the                    coordinators, project evaluators,                     The EBP Self-Assessment will be
                                                  capacity to deliver quality care, but not               financial staff, behavioral health                    administered in Year 2 of the
                                                  the care itself. The outcome evaluation                 treatment staff, case managers, housing               evaluation. No changes have been made
                                                  will focus on outputs, which are the                    providers, other support services staff,              to the EBP Self-Assessment instrument.
                                                  most immediate or proximal results of                   primary partner staff and other key                      The Permanent Supportive Housing
                                                  project activities (e.g., changes in                    stakeholders, and project client                      (PSH) Self-Assessment is a Web-based
                                                  partner collaboration, the number of                    participants. The purpose of the Site                 survey completed by the CABHI grant
                                                  clients enrolled in mainstream benefits),               Visits is to collect detailed qualitative             projects to understand the extent to
                                                  and client outcomes, particularly those                 information and economic data on                      which they are implementing key
                                                  related to behavioral health and                        project activities conducted by the                   dimensions of PSH and capture the
                                                  homelessness and housing instability.                   grantees and their partners, which will               variability of the PSH model among the
                                                  The data collection tools included in                   directly inform the process evaluation.               projects. Information is collected on the
                                                  this request collect a wide range of                    The qualitative data will also provide                following dimensions: Choice of
                                                  quantitative and qualitative data on                    essential information for the outcome                 housing, separation of housing and
                                                  characteristics of the grantee                          evaluation component by documenting                   services; decent, safe, and affordable
                                                  organization and its partnerships; the                  the interventions provided to clients                 housing; housing integration; tenancy
                                                  system within which the project is                      and the implementation, barriers,                     rights; access to housing; flexible,
                                                  embedded; relationships with                            facilitators, challenges and successes for            voluntary services; service philosophy;
                                                  stakeholders; characteristics of the target             each grant project visited. Each CABHI                and team-based behavioral health.
                                                  population; services received, including                grant project (n=30) will be visited once             Thirty-six respondents (9 State sub-
                                                  implementation of EBPs; staffing                        during Year 2 and once during Year 3                  recipients, 12 Local Governments, and
                                                  patterns; costs of services; barriers and               of the evaluation. No changes have been               15 Communities) are expected to
                                                  facilitators of project implementation;                 made to the Site Visit instruments.                   complete the PSH Self-Assessment one
                                                  and project sustainability efforts. Data                   The EBP Self-Assessment is a Web-                  time, and may include grant project
                                                  collection efforts that will support the                based survey designed to collect                      directors, State sub-recipient
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  evaluation are described below.                         information on the services                           coordinators, or other staff
                                                     The Project Director (PD) Phone                      implemented in CABHI grant projects                   knowledgeable about the project’s PSH
                                                  Interview/Web Survey is designed to                     that have a demonstrable evidence base,               model. The PSH Self-Assessment will be
                                                  systematically collect key grant project                providing a description of the EBP                    administered in Year 2 of the
                                                  characteristics which will directly                     interventions received by project                     evaluation. No changes have been made
                                                  inform the process evaluation                           clients. The EBP Self-Assessment tool is              to the PSH Self-Assessment instrument.




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:04 Nov 22, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00056   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM   23NON1


                                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices                                                                             84603

                                                                                                                                     ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
                                                                                                                                                                    Responses                   Total
                                                                                                                                               Number of                                                      Hours per                   Total
                                                                               Instrument/activity                                                                      per                  number of
                                                                                                                                              respondents                                                     response                burden hours
                                                                                                                                                                    respondent               responses

                                                  PD Phone Interview/Web Survey ........................................                                    39                          1            39                      2.1                82
                                                  Site Visits:
                                                       Opening Session/Project Director Interview .................                                   a 300                             1           300                      2.5               750
                                                       Case Manager, Treatment, Housing Staff/Provider
                                                         Interview ....................................................................               b 540                             1           540                        2             1,080
                                                       Stakeholder Interview ...................................................                      c 270                             1           270                      1.5               405
                                                       Evaluator Interview .......................................................                     d 60                             1            60                        1                60
                                                       Client Focus Group .......................................................                     e 450                             1           450                      1.5               675
                                                       Cost Interview ...............................................................                      f 60                         1            60                        2               120
                                                  Evidence-Based Practice Self-Assessment Part 1 ..............                                             36                          3           108                     0.58                63
                                                  Evidence-Based Practice Self-Assessment Part 2 ..............                                             36                          3           108                     0.25                27
                                                  Permanent Supportive Housing Self-Assessment ...............                                              36                          1            36                     0.67                24

                                                              Total .......................................................................         g 1,650       ........................         1,971   ........................          3,286
                                                     a 10  respondents × 30 site visits = 300 respondents.
                                                     b 18 respondents × 30 site visits = 540 respondents.
                                                     c 9 respondents × 30 site visits = 270 respondents.
                                                     d 2 respondents × 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
                                                     e 15 respondents × 30 site visits = 450 respondents.
                                                     f 2 respondents × 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
                                                     g This is an unduplicated count of total respondents.




                                                    Send comments to Summer King,                                           respondents to respond) and cost, and                              OMB Number: 1660–0006.
                                                  SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,                                         the actual data collection instruments                             Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA
                                                  5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57–B,                                          FEMA will use.                                                   Form 086–0–1, Flood Insurance
                                                  Rockville, MD 20857 OR email a copy                                       DATES: Comments must be submitted on                             Application; FEMA From 086–0–2,
                                                  to summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.                                            or before December 23, 2016.                                     Flood Insurance Cancellation/
                                                  Written comments should be received                                       ADDRESSES: Submit written comments                               Nullification Request Form; FEMA
                                                  by January 23, 2017.                                                      on the proposed information collection                           Form 086–0–3, Flood Insurance General
                                                  Summer King,                                                              to the Office of Information and                                 Change Endorsement; FEMA Form 086–
                                                  Statistician.
                                                                                                                            Regulatory Affairs, Office of                                    0–4, V-Zone Risk Factor Rating Form
                                                                                                                            Management and Budget. Comments
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–28211 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]                                                                                               and Instructions; FEMA Form 086–0–5,
                                                                                                                            should be addressed to the Desk Officer
                                                  BILLING CODE 4162–20–P                                                                                                                     Flood Insurance Preferred Risk Policy
                                                                                                                            for the Department of Homeland
                                                                                                                            Security, Federal Emergency                                      and Newly Mapped Application.
                                                                                                                            Management Agency, and sent via                                    Abstract: In order to provide for the
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                                                    electronic mail to oira.submission@                              availability of policies for flood
                                                  SECURITY                                                                  omb.eop.gov.                                                     insurance, policies are marketed
                                                                                                                            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                 through the facilities of licensed
                                                  Federal Emergency Management
                                                                                                                            Requests for additional information or                           insurance agents or brokers in the
                                                  Agency
                                                                                                                            copies of the information collection                             various States. Applications from agents
                                                  [Docket ID: FEMA–2016–0006; OMB No.                                       should be made to Director, Records                              or brokers are forwarded to a servicing
                                                  1660–0006]                                                                Management Division, 500 C Street SW.,                           company designated as fiscal agent by
                                                                                                                            Washington, DC 20472–3100, or email                              the Federal Insurance Administration.
                                                  Agency Information Collection
                                                  Activities: Submission for OMB                                            address FEMA-Information-Collections-                            Upon receipt and examination of the
                                                                                                                            Management@fema.dhs.gov.                                         application and required premium, the
                                                  Review; Comment Request; National
                                                  Flood Insurance Program Policy Forms                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This                                  servicing company issues the
                                                                                                                            proposed information collection                                  appropriate Federal flood insurance
                                                  AGENCY: Federal Emergency                                                 previously published in the Federal                              policy.
                                                  Management Agency, DHS.                                                   Register on March 27, 2016 at 81 FR                                Affected Public: Individuals or
                                                  ACTION: Notice.                                                           14459 with a 60 day public comment                               households; State, local or Tribal
                                                                                                                            period. No comments were received.
                                                  SUMMARY:   The Federal Emergency                                                                                                           Government; Business or other for
                                                                                                                            The purpose of this notice is to notify
                                                  Management Agency (FEMA) will                                                                                                              profit; Not-for-profit institutions; and
                                                                                                                            the public that FEMA will submit the
                                                  submit the information collection                                         information collection abstracted below                          Farms.
                                                  abstracted below to the Office of                                         to the Office of Management and Budget                             Estimated Number of Respondents:
                                                  Management and Budget for review and
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                            for review and clearance.                                        601,067.
                                                  clearance in accordance with the
                                                                                                                            Collection of Information                                          Estimated Total Annual Burden
                                                  requirements of the Paperwork
                                                  Reduction Act of 1995. The submission                                                                                                      Hours: 91,016 hours.
                                                                                                                              Title: National Flood Insurance
                                                  will describe the nature of the                                           Program Policy Forms.                                              Estimated Cost: The cost to
                                                  information collection, the categories of                                   Type of Information Collection:                                respondents is $6,500 for engineer or
                                                  respondents, the estimated burden (i.e.,                                  Revision of a currently approved                                 architect services.
                                                  the time, effort and resources used by                                    information collection.


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014        18:04 Nov 22, 2016         Jkt 241001       PO 00000       Frm 00057    Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703      E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM      23NON1



Document Created: 2016-11-23 05:30:19
Document Modified: 2016-11-23 05:30:19
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 84601 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR