81 FR 84629 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Exception in Exchange Rule 1000(f) for Sub-MPV Split-Price Orders
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 226 (November 23, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 226 (November 23, 2016)
| Page Range | 84629-84631 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28189 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 84629-84631] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28189] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-79345; File No. SR-Phlx-2016-82] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Exception in Exchange Rule 1000(f) for Sub- MPV Split-Price Orders November 17, 2016. I. Introduction On August 3, 2016, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Exchange'' or ``Phlx'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to provide an additional exception to the mandatory use of the Exchange's Floor Broker Management System (``FBMS'') pursuant to Rule 1000(f)(iii) to permit Floor Brokers to execute certain sub-minimum price increment (``sub-MPV'') split-price orders in the trading crowd. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on August 22, 2016.\3\ On October 3, 2016, the Commission extended the time period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change to November 20, 2016.\4\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order institutes proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\ to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78593 (August 16, 2016), 81 FR 56724 (``Notice''). \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79023 (October 3, 2016), 81 FR 69877 (October 7, 2016). \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change Currently, Phlx Rule 1000(f) requires that all Exchange options transactions be executed in one of the following three ways: ``(i) [a]utomatically by the Exchange Trading System pursuant to Rule 1080 and other applicable options rules; (ii) by and among members in the Exchange's options trading crowd none of whom is a Floor Broker; or (iii) through the Options [FBMS] for trades involving at least one Floor Broker.'' \6\ Although a Floor Broker may represent orders in the trading crowd, a Floor Broker is not permitted to execute an order in the trading crowd unless one of three exceptions applies.\7\ The exceptions to the mandatory use of FBMS \8\ are set forth in Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii). These exceptions allow a Floor Broker to execute a transaction in the trading crowd (rather than through FBMS) if: (i) there is a problem with Exchange's systems; (ii) the Floor Broker is executing the trade pursuant to Phlx Rule 1059 (``Accommodation Transactions'') or Phlx Rule 1079 (``Flex Index, Equity and Currency Options''); or (iii) the transaction involves a multi-leg order with more than 15 legs.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Phlx Rule 1000(f). \7\ See Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii). \8\ The original FBMS (``FBMS 1'') began operating in 2005. The Exchange retired FBMS 1 on March 31, 2016 after operating it concurrently with the Exchange's enhanced FBMS (``FBMS 2''), which was made available on March 7, 2014. As of March 31, 2016, FBMS 2 is available to all Floor Brokers in all options and is the only FBMS currently in use. The Exchange represents that it has contracted with a third-party to build an alternative system (``FBMS 3'') to replace FBMS 2, and anticipates that FBMS 3 will be ready by November 30, 2016. See Notice, supra note 3, at 56725. \9\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726; see also Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(A)-(C). According to the Exchange, each time a Floor Broker uses one the current exceptions to Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii), the Floor Broker is required by Phlx Rule 1063(e)(ii), to record the information required by Phlx Rule 1063(e)(i) on paper trade tickets. The Exchange further represents that a Floor Broker may only represent an order for execution that has been time stamped with the time of entry on the trading floor. In addition, according to the Exchange, once an execution occurs, the trade ticket must be stamped with the time of execution of such order. See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phlx Rule 1014(g)(i)(B) provides a priority rule regarding open outcry split price transactions in equity options and options overlying ETFs to permit a member who is responding to an order for at least 100 contracts who buys (sells) at least 50 contracts at a particular price to have priority over all other orders in purchasing (selling) up to an equivalent number of contracts of the same order at the next lower (higher) price without being required to yield to existing customer interest in the limit order book.\10\ Absent Phlx Rule 1014(g)(i)(B), such orders would be required to yield priority. The Exchange states that ``the purpose behind the split-price priority exception was `to bring about the execution of large orders, which by virtue of their size and the need to execute them at multiple prices may be difficult to execute [[Page 84630]] without a limited exception to the priority rules.' '' \11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726 (citing Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51820 (June 10, 2005), 70 FR 35759 (June 21, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2005-28)) (approving pilot). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55993 (June 29, 2007), 72 FR 37301 (July 9, 2007) (SR-Phlx-2007-44) (permanent approval). \11\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to the Exchange, split-price orders are currently processed using either FBMS 2 or paper tickets, depending on whether the split-price order can be evenly split using simple calculations or whether the transaction involves non-even integers and sub-MPV price points, thus requiring a more complicated computation to determine the number of contracts to trade at two different price points.\12\ The Exchange represents that FBMS 2 does not have the capability to calculate specific volumes at different prices for transactions resulting from split-price orders.\13\ To compensate for this system limitation, the Exchange is proposing to amend Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii) to add a new exception from the mandatory use of FBMS that would expressly authorize Floor Brokers to execute certain split-price orders in the trading crowd. Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing in Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(D) to allow the following split-price orders to be executed in the trading crowd: (1) simple orders not expressed in the applicable sub-MPV and that cannot be evenly split into two whole numbers to create a price at the midpoint of the MPV; and (2) complex and multi-leg orders with at least one option leg with an odd-numbered volume that must trade at a sub-MPV price or one leg that qualifies under (1) above.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726. Today, when the computation is more complicated, surveillance staff allows a Floor Broker to execute split-price orders involving non-even integers and sub-MPV price points in open outcry using paper tickets pursuant to Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(A). See id. \13\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726. \14\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 56724. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also proposes that, in addition to split-price orders executed pursuant to proposed Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(D), Phlx surveillance staff would approve all executions submitted under Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii) to validate that such executions abide by applicable priority and trade-through rules.\15\ The Exchange also proposes to round prices if necessary to execute the trade at the MPV, but only to the benefit of a customer order, or, where multiple customer orders are involved, for the customer order that is earliest in time.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See proposed Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii). \16\ See proposed Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii); see also Notice, supra note 3, at 56727. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-Phlx- 2016-82 and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\17\ to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. Institution of such proceedings is appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy issues raised by the proposed rule change. Institution of proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, as described in greater detail below, the Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to comment on the proposed rule change to inform the Commission's analysis of whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\18\ the Commission is providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration. The Commission is instituting proceeding to allow for additional analysis of, and input from commenters with respect to, the consistency of the proposed rule change with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\19\ which requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed, among other things, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers,\20\ and with the Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ Id. Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act also provides that proceedings to determine whether to disapprove a proposed rule change must be concluded within 180 days of the date of publication of the notice of the filing of the proposed rule change. The time for conclusion of the proceedings may be extended for up to 60 days if the Commission finds good cause for such extension and publishes its reasons for so finding. See id. \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \21\ The Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Markets Plan is available at http://www.optionsclearing.com/components/docs/clearing/services/options_order_protection_plan.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, under the Commission's rules of procedure, a self- regulatory organization that proposes to amend its rules bears the burden of demonstrating that its proposal is consistent with the Act.\22\ In this regard: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ Rule 700(b)(3), 17 CFR 201.700(b)(3). the description of the proposed rule change, its purpose and operation, its effect, and a legal analysis of its consistency with the applicable requirements must all be sufficiently detailed and specific to support an affirmative Commission finding. Any failure of the self-regulatory organization to provide the information elicited by Form 19b-4 may result in the Commission not having a sufficient basis to make an affirmative finding that a proposed rule change is consistent with the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to the self-regulation organization.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ Id. IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments The Commission requests that interested persons provide written submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have with respect to the proposed rule change. In particular, the Commission invites written views of interested persons concerning whether the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) or any other provision of the Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder. Although there do not appear to be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval which would be facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, the Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4, any request for an opportunity to make an oral presentation.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants the Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory organization. See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 30 (1975). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments regarding whether the proposal should be approved or disapproved by December 14, 2016. Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal to any other person's submission must file that rebuttal by December 28, 2016. The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency and merit of the Exchange's statements in support of the proposed rule change, in addition to any other comments they may wish to submit about the proposed rule change. The Commission notes that Phlx states that ``rounding of prices is used only where necessary to execute a trade at the MPV, and only to the benefit of a customer order. . . .'' \25\ The Commission seeks commenters' views on the Exchange's statements, which are set forth in the Notice,\26\ regarding how [[Page 84631]] the Exchange would round prices for split-price orders, particularly when no customer orders are involved, in addition to any other comments they may wish to submit about the proposed rule change. The Commission seeks comment on whether this aspect of the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5), which requires, among other things, that a proposed rule change not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 56724. \26\ See Notice, supra note 3. \27\ 15 U.S.C.78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission is concerned that the Exchange has not made clear what the time of execution would be for split-price orders executed manually by Floor Brokers pursuant to the exception proposed in Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(D) or how Floor Brokers would use paper tickets to execute split-price orders under the proposed exception. The Commission seeks commenters' views on the sufficiency of the Exchange's statements regarding the execution of a split-price order by a Floor Broker pursuant to the proposed exception under Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(D). In addition, the Commission seeks comment on whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Options Order Protection and Locked/ Crossed Market Plan. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-Phlx-2016-82 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2016-82. The file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2016-82 and should be submitted on or before December 14, 2016. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by December 28, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-28189 Filed 11-22-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices 84629
DATES: The public meeting will be held SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE orders in the trading crowd, a Floor
on Wednesday, December 7, 2016. COMMISSION Broker is not permitted to execute an
Written statements should be received order in the trading crowd unless one of
[Release No. 34–79345; File No. SR–Phlx–
on or before Monday, December 5, 2016. 2016–82] three exceptions applies.7 The
exceptions to the mandatory use of
ADDRESSES: Written statements may be
Self-Regulatory Organizations; FBMS 8 are set forth in Phlx Rule
submitted by any of the following
NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Order Instituting 1000(f)(iii). These exceptions allow a
methods:
Proceedings To Determine Whether To Floor Broker to execute a transaction in
Electronic Statements Approve or Disapprove a Proposed the trading crowd (rather than through
Rule Change To Adopt a New FBMS) if: (i) there is a problem with
• Use the Commission’s Internet Exception in Exchange Rule 1000(f) for Exchange’s systems; (ii) the Floor Broker
submission form (http://www.sec.gov/ Sub-MPV Split-Price Orders is executing the trade pursuant to Phlx
info/smallbus/acsec.shtml); or Rule 1059 (‘‘Accommodation
November 17, 2016.
• Send an email message to rule- Transactions’’) or Phlx Rule 1079 (‘‘Flex
comments@sec.gov. Please include File I. Introduction Index, Equity and Currency Options’’);
Number 265–27 on the subject line; or On August 3, 2016, NASDAQ PHLX or (iii) the transaction involves a multi-
LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Phlx’’) filed with leg order with more than 15 legs.9
Paper Statements
the Securities and Exchange Phlx Rule 1014(g)(i)(B) provides a
• Send paper statements to Brent J. Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant priority rule regarding open outcry split
Fields, Federal Advisory Committee to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities price transactions in equity options and
Management Officer, Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule options overlying ETFs to permit a
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule member who is responding to an order
Washington, DC 20549–1090. change to provide an additional for at least 100 contracts who buys
exception to the mandatory use of the (sells) at least 50 contracts at a
All submissions should refer to File No. Exchange’s Floor Broker Management particular price to have priority over all
265–27. This file number should be System (‘‘FBMS’’) pursuant to Rule other orders in purchasing (selling) up
included on the subject line if email is 1000(f)(iii) to permit Floor Brokers to to an equivalent number of contracts of
used. To help us process and review execute certain sub-minimum price the same order at the next lower (higher)
your statement more efficiently, please increment (‘‘sub-MPV’’) split-price price without being required to yield to
use only one method. The Commission orders in the trading crowd. The existing customer interest in the limit
will post all statements on the Advisory proposed rule change was published for order book.10 Absent Phlx Rule
Committee’s Web site at http:// comment in the Federal Register on 1014(g)(i)(B), such orders would be
www.sec.gov./info/smallbus/ August 22, 2016.3 On October 3, 2016, required to yield priority. The Exchange
acsec.shtml. the Commission extended the time states that ‘‘the purpose behind the
Statements also will be available for period within which to approve the split-price priority exception was ‘to
Web site viewing and printing in the proposed rule change, disapprove the bring about the execution of large
Commission’s Public Reference Room, proposed rule change, or institute orders, which by virtue of their size and
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC proceedings to determine whether to the need to execute them at multiple
20549, on official business days approve or disapprove the proposed prices may be difficult to execute
rule change to November 20, 2016.4 The
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
Commission received no comments on 7 See Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii).
3:00 p.m. All statements received will
the proposal. This order institutes 8 The original FBMS (‘‘FBMS 1’’) began operating
be posted without change; we do not in 2005. The Exchange retired FBMS 1 on March
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of
edit personal identifying information 31, 2016 after operating it concurrently with the
the Act 5 to determine whether to
from submissions. You should submit Exchange’s enhanced FBMS (‘‘FBMS 2’’), which
disapprove the proposed rule change. was made available on March 7, 2014. As of March
only information that you wish to make
31, 2016, FBMS 2 is available to all Floor Brokers
available publicly. II. Description of the Proposed Rule in all options and is the only FBMS currently in
Change use. The Exchange represents that it has contracted
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie with a third-party to build an alternative system
Z. Davis, Senior Special Counsel, at Currently, Phlx Rule 1000(f) requires (‘‘FBMS 3’’) to replace FBMS 2, and anticipates that
(202) 551–3460, Office of Small that all Exchange options transactions FBMS 3 will be ready by November 30, 2016. See
Business Policy, Division of Corporation be executed in one of the following Notice, supra note 3, at 56725.
Finance, Securities and Exchange three ways: ‘‘(i) [a]utomatically by the 9 See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726; see also Phlx
Exchange Trading System pursuant to Rule 1000(f)(iii)(A)–(C). According to the Exchange,
Commission, 100 F Street NE., each time a Floor Broker uses one the current
Washington, DC 20549–3628. Rule 1080 and other applicable options exceptions to Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii), the Floor
rules; (ii) by and among members in the Broker is required by Phlx Rule 1063(e)(ii), to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Exchange’s options trading crowd none record the information required by Phlx Rule
accordance with Section 10(a) of the of whom is a Floor Broker; or (iii) 1063(e)(i) on paper trade tickets. The Exchange
further represents that a Floor Broker may only
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 through the Options [FBMS] for trades represent an order for execution that has been time
U.S.C.—App. 1, and the regulations involving at least one Floor Broker.’’ 6 stamped with the time of entry on the trading floor.
thereunder, Keith F. Higgins, Designated Although a Floor Broker may represent In addition, according to the Exchange, once an
Federal Officer of the Committee, has execution occurs, the trade ticket must be stamped
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
with the time of execution of such order. See
ordered publication of this notice. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Notice, supra note 3, at 56726.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 10 See Notice, supra note 3, at 56726 (citing
Dated: November 18, 2016. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78593
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51820 (June
Brent J. Fields, (August 16, 2016), 81 FR 56724 (‘‘Notice’’). 10, 2005), 70 FR 35759 (June 21, 2005) (SR–Phlx–
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79023
Committee Management Officer. 2005–28)) (approving pilot). See also Securities
(October 3, 2016), 81 FR 69877 (October 7, 2016). Exchange Act Release No. 55993 (June 29, 2007), 72
[FR Doc. 2016–28257 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am] 5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
FR 37301 (July 9, 2007) (SR–Phlx–2007–44)
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 6 See Phlx Rule 1000(f). (permanent approval).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Nov 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_84855/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices 84631
the Exchange would round prices for Commission and any person, other than thereunder,4 which renders it effective
split-price orders, particularly when no those that may be withheld from the upon filing with the Commission. The
customer orders are involved, in public in accordance with the Commission is publishing this notice to
addition to any other comments they provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be solicit comments on the proposed rule
may wish to submit about the proposed available for Web site viewing and change from interested persons.
rule change. The Commission seeks printing in the Commission’s Public
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
comment on whether this aspect of the Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
proposal is consistent with Section Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Washington, DC 20549, on official
6(b)(5), which requires, among other the Proposed Rule Change
business days between the hours of
things, that a proposed rule change not 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such The Exchange filed a proposal to add
be designed to permit unfair filing also will be available for proposed Rule 8.18 to require the
discrimination between customers, inspection and copying at the principal publication of the Exchange’s
issuers, brokers, or dealers.27 office of the Exchange. All comments disciplinary complaints and
The Commission is concerned that the received will be posted without change; disciplinary decisions issued and to
Exchange has not made clear what the the Commission does not edit personal remove the part of Interpretation and
time of execution would be for split- identifying information from Policy .01 to Rule 8.11 that currently
price orders executed manually by Floor submissions. You should submit only governs the publication of disciplinary
Brokers pursuant to the exception information that you wish to make complaints and information related to
proposed in Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(D) or publicly available. All submissions disciplinary complaints.
how Floor Brokers would use paper should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– The text of the proposed rule change
tickets to execute split-price orders 2016–82 and should be submitted on or is available at the Exchange’s Web site
under the proposed exception. The before December 14, 2016. Rebuttal at www.batstrading.com, at the
Commission seeks commenters’ views comments should be submitted by principal office of the Exchange, and at
on the sufficiency of the Exchange’s December 28, 2016. the Commission’s Public Reference
statements regarding the execution of a Room.
split-price order by a Floor Broker For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
pursuant to the proposed exception authority.28 Statement of the Purpose of, and
under Phlx Rule 1000(f)(iii)(D). In
Brent J. Fields, Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
addition, the Commission seeks
Secretary. Change
comment on whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Options [FR Doc. 2016–28189 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am] In its filing with the Commission, the
Order Protection and Locked/Crossed BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Exchange included statements
Market Plan. concerning the purpose of and basis for
Comments may be submitted by any the proposed rule change and discussed
of the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE any comments it received on the
COMMISSION proposed rule change. The text of these
Electronic Comments statements may be examined at the
[Release No. 34–79343; File No. SR-
• Use the Commission’s Internet places specified in Item IV below. The
BatsEDGA–2016–27]
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Exchange has prepared summaries, set
rules/sro.shtml); or Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
• Send an email to rule- EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing the most significant parts of such
comments@sec.gov. Please include File and Immediate Effectiveness of an statements.
Number SR–Phlx–2016–82 on the Amendment to Rule 8.11, Effective
subject line. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Date of Judgment and the Adoption of Statement of the Purpose of, and
Paper Comments Rule 8.18, Release of Disciplinary Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
• Send paper comments in triplicate Complaints, Decisions and Other Change
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Information
1. Purpose
Commission, 100 F Street NE., November 17, 2016.
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Reorganization of Exchange Rules
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
All submissions should refer to File Governing Release of Disciplinary
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Number SR–Phlx–2016–82. The file Complaints, Decisions and Other
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
number should be included on the Information Based on FINRA Rule 8313
notice is hereby given that on November
subject line if email is used. To help the 3, 2016, Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule
Commission process and review your ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the 8.11 currently provides, in part, that the
comments more efficiently, please use Securities and Exchange Commission Exchange shall cause details regarding
only one method. The Commission will (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule all formal disciplinary actions where a
post all comments on the Commission’s change as described in Items I and II final decision has been issued, except as
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ below, which Items have been prepared provided in Rule 8.15(a), to be
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the by the Exchange. The Exchange has published on its Web site. Interpretation
submission, all subsequent designated this proposal as a ‘‘non- and Policy .01 also provides that the
amendments, all written statements Exchange shall not issue any press
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
controversial’’ proposed rule change
with respect to the proposed rule pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the release or other statement to the press
change that are filed with the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) concerning any formal or informal
Commission, and all written disciplinary matter unless the Chief
communications relating to the 28 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57). Regulatory Officer recommends a press
proposed rule change between the 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). release to the Executive Committee or
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
27 15 U.S.C.78f(b)(5). 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:35 Nov 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_84855/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-11-23 05:29:45
Document Modified: 2016-11-23 05:29:45
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 84629 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR