81 FR 8592 - Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Toyota

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 33 (February 19, 2016)

Page Range		8592-8594
FR Document		2016-03443

This document grants in full the Toyota Motor North America, Inc.'s, (Toyota) petition for an exemption of the Lexus RX vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the 49 CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard).

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 33 (Friday, February 19, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8592-8594]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft 
Prevention Standard; Toyota

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Toyota Motor North America, 
Inc.'s, (Toyota) petition for an exemption of the Lexus RX vehicle line 
in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft 
Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has 
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as 
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and 
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking 
requirements of the 49 CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft 
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard).

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with 
the 2017 model year (MY).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, International 
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43-439, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's phone number is 
(202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated December 1, 2015, Toyota 
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft 
Prevention Standard for the Lexus RX vehicle line beginning with MY 
2017. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant 
to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, 
based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment 
for the entire vehicle line.
    Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to 
grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its 
petition, Toyota provided a detailed description and diagram of the 
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft 
device for the Lexus RX vehicle line. Toyota stated that its MY 2017 
Lexus RX vehicle line and RX hybrid vehicle model (HV) will be 
installed with a ``smart entry and start'' system and an engine 
immobilizer device as standard equipment. Toyota further explained that 
the ``smart entry and start'' system on its Lexus RX vehicle line will 
have slightly different components than those on its RX HV model. Key 
components of the ``smart entry and start'' system on the Lexus RX 
vehicle line will include an engine immobilizer, a certification 
electronic control unit (ECU), engine switch, steering lock ECU, 
security indicator, door control receiver, electrical key, an 
electronic control module (ECM) and an ID code box. The key components 
installed on its RX HV model will also include a power switch and a 
power source HV-ECU. Toyota stated that it will also install an audible 
and visual alarm system on its Lexus RX vehicle line as standard 
equipment and that there will be position switches installed on the 
vehicle to protect the hood and doors from unauthorized tampering/
opening. Toyota further explained locking of the doors can be 
accomplished through use of a conventional key, wireless switch 
incorporated within the keyfob or its

[[Page 8593]]

smart entry system, and that unauthorized tampering with the hood or 
door without using one of these methods will cause the position 
switches to trigger the alarm system.
    Toyota's submission is considered a complete petition as required 
by 49 CFR 543.7 in that it meets the general requirements contained in 
Sec.  543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec.  543.6.
    In addressing the specific content requirements of Sec.  543.6, 
Toyota provided information on the reliability and durability of its 
proposed device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, 
Toyota conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Toyota 
provided a detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., high and low 
temperature, strength, impact, vibration, electro-magnetic 
interference, etc.). Toyota stated that it believes that its device is 
reliable and durable because it complied with its own specific design 
standards and the antitheft device is installed on other vehicle lines 
for which the agency has granted a parts-marking exemption. Toyota 
stated that the antitheft device is already installed as standard 
equipment on its MY 2003 Lexus RX vehicle line and the MY 2006 RX HV 
model. The theft rate for the Toyota Lexus RX vehicle line using an 
average of three model years' data (MYs 2011-2013) is 0.3679, which is 
well below the 3.5826 median theft rate. As an additional measure of 
reliability and durability, Toyota stated that its vehicle key 
cylinders are covered with casting cases to prevent the key cylinder 
from easily being broken. Toyota further explained that the numerous 
key cylinder combinations and key plates it uses for its gutter keys 
would make it very difficult to unlock the doors without using a valid 
key. If a valid key is used, the key cylinders spin out and its locks 
will not work.
    Toyota stated that its Lexus RX vehicles' ``smart entry and start'' 
system allows the driver to press the engine switch button located on 
the instrument panel to start the vehicle. Once the driver pushes the 
engine switch button, the certification ECU verifies the electrical 
key. When the key is verified, the certification ECU, ID code box and 
steering lock ECU receive confirmation of the valid key, and the 
certification ECU allows the ECM to start the engine. With the RX HV 
model ``smart entry and start'' system, once the driver pushes the 
power switch button, the certification ECU verifies the key, the 
certification ECU, ID code box and steering lock ECU receive 
confirmation of a valid key, and then the certification ECU will allow 
the ECM to start the vehicle.
    Toyota stated that with its ``smart entry and start'' system, the 
immobilizer device is activated when the engine switch is pushed from 
the ``ON'' ignition status to any other ignition status, the 
certification ECU performs the calculation of the immobilizer and the 
immobilizer signals the ECM to activate the device. On the RX HV model, 
the ``smart entry and start'' system's immobilizer device is activated 
when the power switch is pushed from the ``ON'' ignition status to any 
other ignition status, the certification ECU performs the calculation 
of the immobilizer and the immobilizer signals the HV-ECU to activate 
the device. Deactivation of its smart key-installed systems occurs when 
the doors are unlocked and the device recognizes the key code. 
Deactivation of the conventional key system occurs when the door is 
unlocked and the key is turned to the ``ON'' position.
    Toyota also compared its proposed device to other devices NHTSA has 
determined to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle 
theft as would compliance with the parts-marking requirements (i.e., 
Toyota Camry, Corolla, Prius, RAV4, Highlander, Sienna, Lexus LS, and 
Lexus GS vehicle lines) which have all been granted parts-marking 
exemptions by the agency. The theft rates for the Toyota Camry, 
Corolla, Prius, RAV4, Highlander, Sienna, Lexus LS, and Lexus GS 
vehicle lines using an average of three model years' data (2011-2013) 
are 1.3030, 1.3988, 0.2464, 0.4100, 0.4603, 0.5124, 0.4879 and 0.9116 
respectively. Therefore, Toyota has concluded that the antitheft device 
proposed for its Lexus RX vehicle line is no less effective than those 
devices on the lines for which NHTSA has already granted full exemption 
from the parts-marking requirements. Toyota stated that it believes 
that installing the immobilizer as standard equipment reduces the theft 
rate and expects the Lexus RX vehicle line to experience comparable 
effectiveness, and ultimately be more effective than parts-marking 
labels.
    Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Toyota on its device, 
the agency believes that the antitheft device for the Lexus RX vehicle 
line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor 
vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the 
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). The agency concludes that the 
device will provide the five types of performance listed in Sec.  
543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; attracting attention to the efforts 
of unauthorized persons to enter or operate a vehicle by means other 
than a key; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by 
unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by 
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and durability of 
the device.
    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7 (b), the agency grants 
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part 
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon 
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely 
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as 
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency 
finds that Toyota has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the 
antitheft device for the Toyota Lexus RX vehicle line is likely to be 
as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as 
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention 
Standard (49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information 
Toyota provided about its device.
    For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full 
Toyota's petition for exemption for the Toyota Lexus RX vehicle line 
from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The agency 
notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that 
are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 
49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the 
disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the 
release of future product nameplates, the beginning model year for 
which the petition is granted and a general description of the 
antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law enforcement 
agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts marking 
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
    If Toyota decides not to use the exemption for this line, it should 
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must 
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts 541.5 
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
    NHTSA notes that if Toyota wishes in the future to modify the 
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit 
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted 
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the

[[Page 8594]]

line's exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the 
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of 
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in 
that exemption.''
    The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part 
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself. 
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the 
submission of a modification petition for every change to the 
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many 
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the 
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which 
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency 
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 
1.95.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2016-03443 Filed 2-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P

8592 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices

Q. How do I file my request? Attachment 1 to Frequently Asked marking requirements of the 49 CFR
A. You can file a request by going to FRA’s Questions part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and clicking on
FAST Act—SECTION 11405—BRIDGE
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention
the Bridge Inspection Report link. There you Standard).
INSPECTION REPORTS
will find the ‘‘Bridge Inspection Report
Public Version Request Form’’ (FRA F Section 417(d) of the Rail Safety DATES: The exemption granted by this
6180.167). Please complete this pdf fillable Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 20103 notice is effective beginning with the
form by providing all of the information note) is amended—(1) by striking ‘‘The 2017 model year (MY).
listed in the question above and click on the Secretary’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘(1) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
‘‘submit’’ box when completed. This will IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and (2) by Carlita Ballard, International Policy,
automatically create an email that will send adding at the end the following: ‘‘(2)
AVAILABILITY OF BRIDGE CONDITION.—
Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs,
the completed form directly to FRA. A link NHTSA, W43–439, 1200 New Jersey
to the form has also been provided at the end ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A State or political
of these questions below. subdivision of a State may file a request with Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
If you are unable to submit the form to FRA the Secretary for a public version of a bridge Ballard’s phone number is (202) 366–
directly, please fill out the ‘‘Bridge Inspection inspection report generated under subsection 5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–2990.
Report Public Version Request Form’’ (FRA F (b)(5) for a bridge located in such State or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
6180.167) and attached it in an email to political subdivision’s jurisdiction. petition dated December 1, 2015, Toyota
FRABridgeInspectionReportRequest@dot.gov. ‘‘(B) PUBLIC VERSION OF REPORT.—If requested an exemption from the parts-
Requests will only be accepted through this the Secretary determines that the request is
reasonable, the Secretary shall require a
marking requirements of the Theft
email address with the proper form Prevention Standard for the Lexus RX
completely filled out and attached. railroad to submit a public version of the
most recent bridge inspection report, such as vehicle line beginning with MY 2017.
Q. How will FRA handle a request? a summary form, for a bridge subject to a The petition requested an exemption
A. FRA will evaluate the request and, if request under subparagraph (A). The public from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
found to be compliant with law, FRA will version of a bridge inspection report shall part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
promptly request that the railroad include the date of last inspection, length of Prevention Standard, based on the
responsible for the bridge provide a public bridge, location of bridge, type of bridge, type installation of an antitheft device as
version of the most recent inspection of structure, feature crossed by bridge, and standard equipment for the entire
report(s) to FRA. Once FRA has received the railroad contact information, along with a
general statement on the condition of the
vehicle line.
report(s), FRA will review the report(s) to Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a
ensure that at least the minimum information bridge.
‘‘(C) PROVISION OF REPORT.—The manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
required by law has been provided. Once
Secretary shall provide to a State or political grant an exemption for one vehicle line
determined to be satisfactory, the report(s)
will be sent to the requester electronically by subdivision of a State a public version of a per model year. In its petition, Toyota
reply to the request unless the requester bridge inspection report submitted under provided a detailed description and
provides an alternate email address to send subparagraph (B). diagram of the identity, design, and
the report to. ‘‘(D) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The location of the components of the
Secretary, upon the reasonable request of antitheft device for the Lexus RX
Q. What information must a railroad include State or political subdivision of a State, shall
in the public version of the bridge inspection vehicle line. Toyota stated that its MY
provide technical assistance to such State or
report provided to FRA? 2017 Lexus RX vehicle line and RX
political subdivision of a State to facilitate
the understanding of a bridge inspection hybrid vehicle model (HV) will be
A. The FAST Act requires the following
information to be included in a public report.’’ installed with a ‘‘smart entry and start’’
version of a bridge inspection report: [FR Doc. 2016–03441 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am] system and an engine immobilizer
1. The date of the last inspection; BILLING CODE 4910–06–P device as standard equipment. Toyota
2. Length of bridge; further explained that the ‘‘smart entry
3. Location of bridge; and start’’ system on its Lexus RX
4. Type of bridge (superstructure); DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vehicle line will have slightly different
5. Type of structure (substructure); components than those on its RX HV
6. Features crossed by the bridge; National Highway Traffic Safety model. Key components of the ‘‘smart
7. Railroad contact information; and Administration entry and start’’ system on the Lexus RX
8. A general statement on the condition of
the bridge. vehicle line will include an engine
Petition for Exemption From the immobilizer, a certification electronic
Q. How much time does a railroad have to Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention control unit (ECU), engine switch,
provide the public version of a bridge Standard; Toyota steering lock ECU, security indicator,
inspection report to FRA?
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic door control receiver, electrical key, an
A. FRA interprets the statute to require a electronic control module (ECM) and an
Safety Administration, Department of
railroad to provide a requested report ID code box. The key components
containing at least the minimum specified Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption. installed on its RX HV model will also
information within a reasonable amount of
time. FRA believes that a reasonable time for include a power switch and a power
a railroad to provide a requested report is SUMMARY: This document grants in full source HV–ECU. Toyota stated that it
within 30 days of receipt of FRA’s request. the Toyota Motor North America, Inc.’s, will also install an audible and visual
(Toyota) petition for an exemption of alarm system on its Lexus RX vehicle
Q. How long will it take FRA to produce a
the Lexus RX vehicle line in accordance line as standard equipment and that
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

public version of a bridge inspection report
to a requester? with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from there will be position switches installed
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This on the vehicle to protect the hood and
A. FRA will handle these requests as
petition is granted because the agency doors from unauthorized tampering/
expeditiously as possible and generally
expects to respond to most requests by has determined that the antitheft device opening. Toyota further explained
providing the requester with a public version to be placed on the line as standard locking of the doors can be
of a bridge inspection report within 45 days equipment is likely to be as effective in accomplished through use of a
of receipt of the request. reducing and deterring motor vehicle conventional key, wireless switch
(Link to Form will be located here) theft as compliance with the parts- incorporated within the keyfob or its

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Feb 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM 19FEN1

8594 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices

line’s exemption is based. Further, Part directed to Kerry Dennis at Internal Approved: February 12, 2016.
543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Kerry Dennis,
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, IRS Tax Analyst.
permit the use of an antitheft device DC 20224, or through the internet at [FR Doc. 2016–03446 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
similar to but differing from the one Kerry.Dennis@irs.gov. BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
specified in that exemption.’’ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The agency wishes to minimize the Title: TD 9451—Guidance Necessary
administrative burden that Part To Facilitate Business Election Filing; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted Finalization of Controlled Group AFFAIRS
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The Qualification Rules (TD 9329).
agency did not intend in drafting Part OMB Number: 1545–2019. [OMB Control No. 2900–NEW]
543 to require the submission of a Regulation Project Number:
modification petition for every change Agency Information Collection (VA
Abstract: This document contains a Financial Services Center (VA–FSC)
to the components or design of an final regulation that provides guidance
antitheft device. The significance of Vendor File Request Form); Activity
to taxpayers for determining which Under OMB Review
many such changes could be de corporations are included in a
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests controlled group of corporations. AGENCY: Financial Services Center,
that if the manufacturer contemplates Current Actions: There are no changes Department of Veterans Affairs.
making any changes, the effects of to these existing regulations. ACTION: Notice.
which might be characterized as de Type of Review: Extension of a
minimis, it should consult the agency currently approved collection. SUMMARY: In compliance with the
before preparing and submitting a Affected Public: Business or other for- Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
petition to modify. profit organizations. (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), this notice
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority Estimated Number of Respondents: announces that the Department of
delegated in 49 CFR 1.95. 225,375. Veterans Affairs—Financial Services
Raymond R. Posten, Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 Center (VA–FSC) will submit the
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. hour, 40 minutes. collection of information abstracted
[FR Doc. 2016–03443 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am] Estimated Total Annual Burden below to the Office of Management and
Hours: 375,000. Budget (OMB) for review and comment.
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
The following paragraph applies to all The PRA submission describes the
of the collections of information covered nature of the information collection and
by this notice: its expected cost and burden and
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY includes the actual data collection
An agency may not conduct or
Internal Revenue Service sponsor, and a person is not required to instrument.
respond to, a collection of information DATES: Comments must be submitted on
Proposed Collection; Comment unless the collection of information or before March 21, 2016.
Request for Regulation Project displays a valid OMB control number.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
Books or records relating to a collection
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), on the collection of information through
of information must be retained as long
Treasury. www.Regulations.gov, or to Office of
as their contents may become material
ACTION: Notice and request for Information and Regulatory Affairs,
in the administration of any internal
comments. Office of Management and Budget, Attn:
revenue law. Generally, tax returns and
VA Desk Officer; 725 17th St. NW.,
tax return information are confidential,
SUMMARY: The Department of the Washington, DC 20503 or sent through
as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort electronic mail to oira_submission@
Request for Comments: Comments
to reduce paperwork and respondent omb.eop.gov. Please refer to ‘‘OMB
submitted in response to this notice will
burden, invites the general public and Control No. 2900–NEW (VA–FSC
be summarized and/or included in the
other Federal agencies to take this Vendor File Request Form)’’ in any
request for OMB approval. All
opportunity to comment on proposed correspondence.
comments will become a matter of
and/or continuing information FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
public record. Comments are invited on:
collections, as required by the Crystal Rennie, Enterprise Records
(a) Whether the collection of
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Service (005R1B), Department of
information is necessary for the proper
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
performance of the functions of the
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 632–
agency, including whether the
soliciting comments concerning 7492 or email crystal.rennie@va.gov.
information shall have practical utility;
Guidance Necessary To Facilitate Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
Business Election Filing; Finalization of NEW (VA–FSC Vendor File Request
of the burden of the collection of
Controlled Group Qualification Rules. Form)’’ in any correspondence.
information; (c) ways to enhance the
DATES: Written comments should be quality, utility, and clarity of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
received on or before April 19, 2016 to information to be collected; (d) ways to Title: VA–FSC Vendor File Request
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

be assured of consideration. minimize the burden of the collection of Form.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments information on respondents, including OMB Control Number: 2900–NEW.
to Kerry Dennis, Internal Revenue through the use of automated collection Type of Review: New collection.
Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution techniques or other forms of information Abstract: The mission of the
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224. technology; and (e) estimates of capital Nationwide Vendor File Division of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: or start-up costs and costs of operation, Department of Veterans Affairs—
Requests for additional information or maintenance, and purchase of services Financial Services Center (VA–FSC) is
copies of the regulation should be to provide information. to add, modify, or delete vendor records

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Feb 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM 19FEN1

Document Created: 2018-02-02 14:31:46
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 14:31:46

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Grant of petition for exemption.
Dates		The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with the 2017 model year (MY).
Contact		Ms. Carlita Ballard, International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43-439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
FR Citation		81 FR 8592

81 FR 8592 - Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Toyota

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 33 (February 19, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration