81 FR 85928 - Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 229 (November 29, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 229 (November 29, 2016)
| Page Range | 85928-85930 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28704 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 85928-85930] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28704] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-872] Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of finished carbon steel flanges (steel flanges) from India. The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES: Effective November 29, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Maloof or Davina Friedmann, AD/ CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5649 or (202) 482-0698, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 28, 2016, the Department published the notice of initiation of this investigation.\1\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the memorandum that is dated concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 81 FR 49625 (July 28, 2016) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Affirmative Determination: Countervailing Duty Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India,'' dated November 21, 2016 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is steel flanges from India. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix I. Scope Comments We received no comments from interested parties regarding the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. Methodology The Department is conducting this countervailing duty (CVD investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy (i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient) and that the subsidy is specific.\3\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination and Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 703(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, we calculated a CVD rate for each individually-investigated producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily determine that countervailable subsidies are being provided with respect to the manufacture, production, or exportation of the subject merchandise. For a full description of the programs which have preliminarily determined to be countervailable, as well as those not used during the POI, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. In accordance with sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, for companies not individually examined, we apply an ``all-others'' rate, which is normally calculated by weight-averaging the individual company subsidy rates of each of the companies investigated. Under section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, the all-others rate should exclude zero and de minimis rates or any rates based entirely on facts otherwise available pursuant to section 776 of the Act. Neither of the mandatory respondents' rates in this preliminary determination were zero or de minimis or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Notwithstanding the language of section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we have not calculated the ``all-others'' rate by weight-averaging the rates of the two individually investigated respondents, because doing so risks disclosure of proprietary information. Instead, we have calculated the all-others rate using a simple average of the final rates for the two mandatory company respondents.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``CALCULATION OF THE ALL-OTHERS RATE'' (for further explanation of the business propretiary information concerns); see also Memorandum to the File, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges: Preliminary Determination Margin Calculation for All- Others,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 85929]] We preliminarily determine the countervailable subsidy rates to be: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, 2.76 UMA Shanker Khandelwal & Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal......................................... R.N. Gupta & Company Limited......................... 3.66 All-Others........................................... 3.21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act, we are directing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all entries of steel flanges from India that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of the publication of this notice in the Federal Register, and to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise in the amounts indicated above. Verification As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act, we intend to verify the information submitted by the respondents prior to making our final determination. U.S. International Trade Commission In accordance with section 703(f) of the Act, we will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information relating to this investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or under an administrative protective order, without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. In accordance with section 705(b)(2) of the Act, if our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will make its final determination within 45 days after the Department makes its final determination. Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose calculations performed for this preliminary determination to the parties within five days of the date of public announcement of this determination in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven days after the date on which the final verification report is issued in this proceeding, and rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\5\ A table of contents, list of authorities used, and an executive summary of issues should accompany any briefs submitted to the Department, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). This summary should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically-filed request must be received successfully, and in its entirety, by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number; the number of participants; and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date, time, and specific location to be determined. Parties will be notified of the date, time, and location of any hearing. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 703(f) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: November 23, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The scope of this investigation covers finished carbon steel flanges. Finished carbon steel flanges differ from unfinished carbon steel flanges (also known as carbon steel flange forgings) in that they have undergone further processing after forging, including, but not limited to, beveling, bore threading, center or step boring, face machining, taper boring, machining ends or surfaces, drilling bolt holes, and/or deburring or shot blasting. Any one of these post-forging processes suffices to render the forging into a finished carbon steel flange for purposes of this investigation. However, mere heat treatment of a carbon steel flange forging (without any other further processing after forging) does not render the forging into a finished carbon steel flange for purposes of this investigation. While these finished carbon steel flanges are generally manufactured to specification ASME 816.5 or ASME 816.47 series A or series 8, the scope is not limited to flanges produced under those specifications. All types of finished carbon steel flanges are included in the scope regardless of pipe size (which may or may not be expressed in inches of nominal pipe size), pressure class (usually, but not necessarily, expressed in pounds of pressure, e.g., 150, 300, 400, 600, 900, 1500, 2500, etc.), type of face (e.g., flat face, full face, raised face, etc.), configuration (e.g., weld neck, slip on, socket weld, lap joint, threaded, etc.), wall thickness (usually, but not necessarily, expressed in inches), normalization, or whether or not heat treated. These carbon steel flanges either meet or exceed the requirements of the ASTM A105, ASTM A694, ASTM A181, ASTM A350 and ASTM A707 standards (or comparable foreign specifications). The scope includes any flanges produced to the above-referenced ASTM standards as currently stated or as may be amended. The term ``carbon steel'' under this scope is steel in which: (a) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements: (b) The carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (c) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, as indicated: (i) 0.87 percent of aluminum; (ii) 0.0105 percent of boron; (iii) 10.10 percent of chromium; (iv) 1.55 percent of columbium; (v) 3.10 percent of copper; (vi) 0.38 percent of lead; (vii) 3.04 percent of manganese; (viii) 2.05 percent of molybdenum; (ix) 20.15 percent of nickel; (x) 1.55 percent of niobium; (xi) 0.20 percent of nitrogen; (xii) 0.21 percent of phosphorus; (xiii) 3.10 percent of silicon; (xiv) 0.21 percent of sulfur; (xv) 1.05 percent of titanium; (xvi) 4.06 percent of tungsten; (xvii) 0.53 percent of vanadium; or (xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium. Finished carbon steel flanges are currently classified under subheadings 7307.91.5010 and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also be entered under HTSUS subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for [[Page 85930]] convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Alignment VI. Injury Test VII. Subsidies Valuation VIII. Loan Benchmark and Interest Rates IX. Use of Facts Otherwise Available X. Analysis of Programs XI. Calculation of All-Others Rate XII. International Trade Commission XIII. Disclosure and Public Comment XIV. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2016-28704 Filed 11-28-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![85928 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2016 / Notices
Department hereby orders the 2016. Interested parties are invited to Methodology
continuation of the AD orders on comment on this preliminary The Department is conducting this
chlorinated isocyanurates from Spain determination. countervailing duty (CVD investigation
and the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border in accordance with section 701 of the
Protection will continue to collect AD DATES: Effective November 29, 2016.
Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act). For each of
cash deposits at the rates in effect at the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the subsidy programs found
time of entry for all imports of subject Emily Maloof or Davina Friedmann, countervailable, we preliminarily
merchandise. AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and determine that there is a subsidy (i.e., a
The effective date of the continuation Compliance, International Trade financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’
of the AD orders will be the date of Administration, U.S. Department of that gives rise to a benefit to the
publication in the Federal Register of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution recipient) and that the subsidy is
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; specific.3 For a full description of the
section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR telephone: (202) 482–5649 or (202) 482– methodology underlying our
351.218(c)(2), the Department intends to 0698, respectively. preliminary conclusions, see the
initiate the next five-year review of Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
these orders not later than 30 days prior SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
to the fifth anniversary of the effective Preliminary Determination and
Background Suspension of Liquidation
date of this continuation notice.
These five-year sunset reviews and On July 28, 2016, the Department In accordance with section
this notice are in accordance with published the notice of initiation of this 703(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, we calculated
section 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act investigation.1 For a complete a CVD rate for each individually-
and published pursuant to section description of the events that followed investigated producer/exporter of the
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR the initiation of this investigation, see subject merchandise. We preliminarily
351.218(f)(4). the memorandum that is dated determine that countervailable subsidies
concurrently with this determination are being provided with respect to the
Administrative Protective Order manufacture, production, or exportation
and hereby adopted by this notice.2 A
This notice also serves as the only list of topics included in the of the subject merchandise. For a full
reminder to parties subject to Preliminary Decision Memorandum is description of the programs which have
administrative protective order (APO) of included as Appendix II to this notice. preliminarily determined to be
their responsibility concerning the The Preliminary Decision Memorandum countervailable, as well as those not
return/destruction or conversion to is a public document and is on file used during the POI, see the Preliminary
judicial protective order of proprietary electronically via Enforcement and Decision Memorandum. In accordance
information disclosed under APO in Compliance’s Antidumping and with sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of
accordance with 19 CFR351.305(a)(3). Countervailing Duty Centralized the Act, for companies not individually
Failure to comply is a violation of the Electronic Service System (ACCESS). examined, we apply an ‘‘all-others’’ rate,
APO which may be subject to sanctions. ACCESS is available to registered users which is normally calculated by weight-
This five-year (sunset) review and at https://access.trade.gov, and to all averaging the individual company
notice are in accordance with section parties in the Central Records Unit, subsidy rates of each of the companies
751(c) and published pursuant to 777(i) Room B8024 of the main Department of investigated.
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Commerce building. In addition, a Under section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the
complete version of the Preliminary Act, the all-others rate should exclude
Dated: November 23, 2016.
Decision Memorandum can be found at zero and de minimis rates or any rates
Paul Piquado, based entirely on facts otherwise
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision available pursuant to section 776 of the
Compliance. Act. Neither of the mandatory
[FR Doc. 2016–28702 Filed 11–28–16; 8:45 am]
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision respondents’ rates in this preliminary
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Memorandum are identical in content. determination were zero or de minimis
or based entirely on facts otherwise
Scope of the Investigation available. Notwithstanding the language
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE of section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we
The product covered by this have not calculated the ‘‘all-others’’ rate
International Trade Administration investigation is steel flanges from India. by weight-averaging the rates of the two
[C–533–872] For a complete description of the scope individually investigated respondents,
of the investigation, see Appendix I. because doing so risks disclosure of
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From proprietary information. Instead, we
Scope Comments
India: Preliminary Affirmative have calculated the all-others rate using
Countervailing Duty Determination We received no comments from a simple average of the final rates for the
interested parties regarding the scope of two mandatory company respondents.4
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, the investigation as it appeared in the
Department of Commerce. Initiation Notice. 3 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
1 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India:
the Act regarding specificity.
(the Department) preliminarily Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 81 4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
determines that countervailable FR 49625 (July 28, 2016) (Initiation Notice). ‘‘CALCULATION OF THE ALL–OTHERS RATE’’
subsidies are being provided to 2 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, ‘‘Decision
(for further explanation of the business propretiary
producers and exporters of finished Memorandum for the Preliminary Affirmative information concerns); see also Memorandum to the
Determination: Countervailing Duty Investigation of File, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Investigation of Finished
carbon steel flanges (steel flanges) from Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India,’’ dated Carbon Steel Flanges: Preliminary Determination
India. The period of investigation (POI) November 21, 2016 (Preliminary Decision Margin Calculation for All-Others,’’ dated
is April 1, 2015, through March 31, Memorandum). concurrently with this memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Nov 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_86157/page/1.svg)
![85930 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2016 / Notices
convenience and customs purposes; the of CTL plate from Germany.1 On include freight revenue reported as a
written description of the scope is November 14, 2016, Nucor Corporation billing adjustment in the freight revenue
dispositive. (Nucor), a petitioner in this cap.
Appendix II investigation, alleged that the • The Department recalculated U.S.
Department made significant ministerial credit expenses incorrectly by deducting
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary errors in the Preliminary freight revenue from the U.S. price used
Decision Memorandum in the calculation. However, the
Determination.2
I. Summary reported U.S. price did not include
II. Background Scope of the Investigation freight revenue.
III. Scope Comments The product covered by this • The Department made an
IV. Scope of the Investigation investigation is CTL plate from adjustment to U.S. price for inventory
V. Alignment
Germany. For a full description of the carrying expenses without converting
VI. Injury Test
VII. Subsidies Valuation scope of this investigation, see the the reported amount from euros to U.S.
VIII. Loan Benchmark and Interest Rates ‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ in dollars.
IX. Use of Facts Otherwise Available Appendix I of this notice. We agree that the alleged errors were
X. Analysis of Programs made. Moreover, pursuant to 19 CFR
Significant Ministerial Error
XI. Calculation of All-Others Rate 351.224(g)(2), these ministerial errors
XII. International Trade Commission A ministerial error is defined in 19 are significant because the correction of
XIII. Disclosure and Public Comment CFR 351.224(f) as ‘‘an error in addition, these errors results in a change from a
XIV. Conclusion subtraction, or other arithmetic weighted-average dumping margin of
[FR Doc. 2016–28704 Filed 11–28–16; 8:45 am] function, clerical error resulting from zero or de minimis to a weighted-
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P inaccurate copying, duplication, or the average dumping margin of greater than
like, and any other similar type of de minimis. Therefore, we are correcting
unintentional error which the Secretary the ministerial errors alleged by Nucor
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE considers ministerial.’’ Further, 19 CFR and we are amending our preliminary
351.224(e) provides that the Department determination accordingly.4
International Trade Administration ‘‘will analyze any comments received
and, if appropriate, correct any Amended Preliminary Determination
[A–428–844] significant ministerial error by We are amending the preliminary
amending the preliminary determination of sales at less-than-fair-
Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To- determination.’’ A significant value for CTL plate from Germany to
Length Plate From the Federal ministerial error is defined as a reflect the correction of ministerial
Republic of Germany: Amended ministerial error, the correction of errors made in the margin calculation of
Preliminary Determination of Sales at which, singly or in combination with that determination for Salzgitter. In
Less Than Fair Value other errors, would result in: (1) A addition, because we calculated a de
change of at least five absolute minimis weighted-average dumping
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, percentage points in, but not less than margin for Salzgitter in the Preliminary
International Trade Administration, 25 percent of, the weighted-average Determination, the preliminary ‘‘All-
Department of Commerce. dumping margin calculated in the Others’’ Rate was based on the
SUMMARY: On November 14, 2016, the original (erroneous) preliminary estimated weighted-average dumping
Department of Commerce (the determination; or (2) a difference margin calculated for Dillinger, the
Department) published in the Federal between a weighted-average dumping other mandatory respondent in this
Register the Preliminary Determination margin of zero or de minimis and a investigation. Thus, we are also
of the antidumping duty investigation of weighted-average dumping margin of amending the ‘‘All-Others’’ rate to
certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to- greater than de minimis or vice versa.3 account for the change in the Salzgitter
length plate (CTL plate) from the Ministerial Error Allegations margin. Accordingly, we are amending
Federal Republic of Germany the calculation of the all-others rate to
Nucor alleges that the Department base it on the weighted-average of the
(Germany). The Department is
made three ministerial errors in its margins calculated for Dillinger and
amending the Preliminary
calculation of the preliminary Salzgitter using publicly-ranged data.
Determination of the investigation to determination margin for Ilsenburger
correct three ministerial errors. Because we cannot apply our normal
Grobblech GmbH, Salzgitter methodology of calculating a weighted-
DATES: Effective November 29, 2016. Mannesmann Grobblech GmbH, average margin due to requests to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH, and protect business-proprietary
Belliveau or David J. Goldberger, AD/ Salzgitter Mannesmann International information, we find this rate to be the
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement GmbH (collectively, Salzgitter): best proxy of the actual weighted-
• In making the adjustment to U.S.
and Compliance, International Trade average margin determined for these
price for reported freight revenue and
Administration, U.S. Department of respondents.5 As a result of the
capping that adjustment by the reported
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
freight expense, the Department did not
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 4 See Memorandum to the File entitled
‘‘Amended Preliminary Determination Margin
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(202) 482–4952 or (202) 482–4136, 1 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- Calculation for Salzgitter’’ (Amended Preliminary
respectively. Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Determination Memorandum) for further discussion
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than of our calculations for this amended preliminary
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fair Value and Postponement of Final determination.
Determination, 81 FR 79446 (November 14, 2016) 5 See, e.g., Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of
Background (Preliminary Determination). Turkey: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
2 See letter from Nucor entitled, ‘‘Nucor’s
On November 14, 2016, the Fair Value, 80 FR 61362, 61363 (October 13, 2015).
Ministerial Error Comments Regarding Salzgitter,’’ For further discussion of the amended calculation
Department published in the Federal dated November 14, 2016 (Nucor Letter). of the all-others rate, see Amended Preliminary
Register the Preliminary Determination 3 See 19 CFR 351.224(g)(1) and (2). Determination Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Nov 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_86157/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-11-29 00:33:32
Document Modified: 2016-11-29 00:33:32
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective November 29, 2016. | |
| Contact | Emily Maloof or Davina Friedmann, AD/ CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5649 or (202) 482-0698, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 85928 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR