81 FR 85987 - Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-NEW

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 229 (November 29, 2016)

Page Range		85987-85990
FR Document		2016-28717
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval for the following new collection of information: 1625-NEW, State Registration Data. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the public. Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below.
Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85987-85990]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2014-0713]


Information Collection Request to Office of Management and 
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625--NEW

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request 
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval for the 
following new collection of information: 1625-NEW, State Registration 
Data. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the 
public. Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting 
comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before January 30, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket 
number [USCG-2014-0713] to the Coast Guard using the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public 
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section for

[[Page 85988]]

further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from: 
Commandant (CG-612), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. Coast 
Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE., Stop 7710, Washington, DC 
20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of 
Information Management, telephone 202-475-3532, or fax 202-372-8405, 
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to 
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard 
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information 
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on 
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection, 
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one 
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be 
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper 
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard 
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the 
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection; 
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information 
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the 
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. In response to 
your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not to seek approval 
for the Collection. We will consider all comments and material received 
during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments 
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of 
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2014-0713], and 
must be received by January 30, 2017.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions. Documents mentioned in this Notice, and all public 
comments, are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and 
can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions. Additionally, 
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will 
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    The Coast Guard published a 60-day notice (79 FR 60483, October 7, 
2014) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That Notice elicited five 
public comment submissions.
    Comment (1): A requestor asks the Coast Guard to consider mandating 
to states that personal watercraft (PWC) data collection is separately 
maintained. This will ensure accuracy in the entirety of boat 
classification data collection and significantly aid PWC manufacturers 
in market assessment.
    Answer: The Coast Guard is maintaining the personal watercraft 
category in our proposed data collection (see 33 CFR174.19(a)(11)); we 
proposed to collect statistics on personal watercraft by length 
category.
    Comment (2) is: A commenter stated that the Coast Guard's 
tabulation of State numbered vessels as a result of this Information 
Collection Request (ICR) cannot be used to measure risk as stated in 
the supplemental Paperwork Reduction Act submission that accompanies 
this ICR, especially since there are numerous recreational boating 
accidents and fatalities that occur in vessels not required to be 
numbered and not reflected in this collection of information.
    Answer: Information in the proposed collection will be used to 
measure risk; Registration data frequently serves as the denominator of 
fatality rates (usually expressed in number of deaths per 100,000 
registered vessels). The existence of registration data allows the 
Coast Guard to normalize data and provide meaningful statistics and 
recommendations for the National Recreational Boating Safety (RBS) 
Program. The revised collection proposed to break down registration by 
motorization so that an additional measure, motorized vessel fatality 
rate, could be used (number of deaths on motorized vessels per 100,000 
motorized registered vessels). This measure would provide a much 
sounder denominator since all States do not collect registration data 
on non-motorized vessels.
    Comment (3) is: A commenter noted that in accordance with 33 CFR 
174.123, each State that has an approved numbering system must prepare 
and submit Coast Guard form CGHQ-3923, Report of Certificates of Number 
Issued to Boats, to the Coast Guard. Although OMB No. 1625--NEW 
reflects the revised vessel type terminology resulting from the Coast 
Guard's 2012 issuance of the Final Rule on Changes to Standard 
Numbering System, Vessel Identification System, and Boating Accident 
Report Database (Docket No. USCG-2003-14963), it does not accurately 
reflect the CFR's terminology in its title or instructions (i.e., all 
references to the approved numbering system, state numbered boats and 
certificates of number have been replaced with registrations and 
registered).
    Answer: This is true. The proposed form focuses on registered 
vessels, which allows the Coast Guard to examine a larger scope of 
vessels that fall under the National Recreational Boating Safety 
Program. The Coast Guard will consider changes to the form title in 33 
CFR 174.123 to more accurately reflect the data collection under this 
Information Collection Request.
    Comment (4) is: A commenter noted that OMB No. 1625--NEW is dated 
June 2014, inferring that is already in use (or may be required for 
use). Because States are currently in various stages of implementation 
of the Final Rule (with final implementation required by January 1, 
2017), States cannot be compelled to begin using OMB No. 1625--NEW 
prior to January 1, 2017. Any required deviation from the use of CGHQ-
3923 prior to January 1, 2017 will result in additional (and in some 
cases, significant) burden and cost to the States.
    Answer: The form is not in use. The June 2014 date was filled in as 
a placeholder. The form was drafted and sent for comment early so that 
the public could comment on the proposed content, and the States could 
prepare for changes after the data collection is finalized. The form 
will not be required for use prior to January 1, 2017.
    Comment (5) is: At this time, the state of Ohio is still in the 
process of transitioning to the new requirements

[[Page 85989]]

cited in 33 CFR 174.19 (which we are required to implement by January 
1, 2017). That being the case, what are the Coast Guard's intentions 
with regard to the version of the reporting form we will need to use to 
make our annual reporting in 2015 and beyond? Will we have the option 
to use the ``older'' version of the reporting form until such time that 
we have transitioned to the new requirements? And, if required to use 
the new form prior to that transition, how will the Coast Guard view 
any incomplete data that might not be able to be generated in the new 
format prior to completion of the transition?
    Answer: The form will not be required for use prior to January 1, 
2017.
    Comment (6) is: Knowing that hull type, and more importantly engine 
drive information can be important details in better identifying and 
understanding the boating demographics within a state, what is the 
rationale for omitting this information in this revised collection 
form?
    Answer: The Coast Guard has not used the hull material or engine 
information collected in prior registration collections. Because we 
have not used the data, we removed it from the form so as to reduce the 
burden of data reporting on the States.
    Comment (7) is: Do the estimates of the form completion burden 
account for any initial burden in transitioning to this revised 
reporting scheme? What is the basis for estimates of burden in items 12 
and 13 of the Supporting Statement for the collection?
    Answer: No. The burden estimate took into account the collection of 
information, which is based on the number of respondents, frequency of 
form submission and an estimate of the time taken to fill out the form.
    Comment (8) is: Is there any relationship between this revision and 
anticipated efforts to bring CFR into agreement with the Uniform 
Certificate of Titling Act for Vessels (UCOTA-V)?
    Answer: There is not a relationship between this revision and the 
UCOTA-V efforts.
    Comment (9) is: Under Puerto Rico law, a Ship or vessel means any 
system of transportation on water that has a motor installed, 
including, but without been limited to jet skis, motorized rafts, power 
sailboats, motor boats, or powered driven boats of any sort, including 
homemade vessels powered by motor, but excluding hydroplanes. A 
watercraft means a mode of transportation which does not have a motor 
installed, such as rowboats, canoes, kayaks, sailboats with or without 
oars, water skis, surfboards with or without sail, rafts, inflatable 
systems, and any device that moves on the surface of the water without 
being propelled by a motor, although it could be fit for installation 
or adaptation of some type of motor. Therefore, the proposed change 
creates an overburden of conflicting definitions or wording to deal 
with in this case. Also, the removal of the proposed definitions leaves 
the accident investigation protocol without proper wording to aid in 
the determination of felonies, infractions, or misdemeanors committed.
    Answer: This comment is outside the scope of this Notice requesting 
comments on this information collection. Please adhere to the 
definitions in 33 CFR 173.3 for use in this information collection.
    Comment (10) is: SS173.57: Same comment as in the previous 
paragraph. Mainly, when evaluating marine events involving either 
vessels, watercrafts, or both. It may also affect the terms and 
conditions of the memorandum of Agreement between the Government of the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the USCG under 14 U.S.C. SS2,89,141; 46 
CFR SS13109 and 33 CFR SS100.01 as to comply with 46 U.S.C. 13103(c)(2) 
on the matter of marine events and boat accident reports procedures.
    Answer: This collection of information does not relate to marine 
events or boat accident report procedures. Therefore, this comment is 
outside the scope of this Notice requesting comments on the collection.
    Comment (11) is: The definitions in 33 CFR 181.3 do not include the 
manufacturing of handmade vessels and is inconsistent with SS181.23(b). 
It should include person engaged in the manufacture of a boat for his 
or her own use (operation) and not for sale.
    Answer: This collection of information is for all registered 
vessels. If a homemade vessel is registered, it should be included in 
the statistics.
    Comment (12) is: If a state has already transitioned--or will soon 
transition--its numbering system and the content of the certificates of 
number over to the requirements cited in 33 CFR 174.19 (i.e., before 
the Jan. 1, 2017 implementation deadline), what version of the form is 
it suppose to use? If, as a result of the ICR, the OMB formally 
approves the collection and issues an OMB Control Number to this 
revised form 3923 before the Jan. 1, 2017 deadline for states to 
implement the new requirements, will a state that does not make the 
transition until the deadline be able to submit its data on the ``old'' 
version of the form?
    Answer: The proposed form would not be required for use until 
January 1, 2017. States would be asked to submit information on the 
historic form. If a State has already transitioned to the new terms 
ahead of the January 1, 2017 deadline, the Coast Guard will accept 
registration data on either form.
    Comment (13) is: If there are variations in the version of the 
forms employed by the states and submitted to the Coast Guard, how will 
the Coast Guard reconcile those differences in the computation and 
report-out of registration data?
    Answer: The Coast Guard will merge datasets if both the historic 
and proposed forms are used.
    In addition to the above comments submitted to the docket, the 
following comments and questions were received by Coast Guard program 
staff members:
    Comment (14) is: Is this just the periodic request to approve the 
continuation of the collection of registration data?
    Answer: Yes.
    Comment (15) is: Has the Notice been issued primarily (at this 
time) as part of the process to get OMB to issue a control number?
    Answer: Yes.
    Comment (16) is: Is this in preparation for collection of 
registration data under the ``new'' vessel terms authorized by the 
Final Rule on State Numbering System (SNS), Vessel Identification 
System (VIS), and Boating Accident Report Database (BARD) (eff. Jan 
2017)?
    Answer: Yes. This form makes use of the ``primary operation'' and 
``vessel type'' in 33 Code of Federal Regulation 174.19.
    Comment (17) is: Is there a revised collection form that will 
accompany it?
    Answer: Yes. There is a revised collection form that is greatly 
simplified. The proposed revision provides instructions, a breakdown of 
recreational vessel types by motorization and length category, a 
breakdown of commercial vessel types, and an administration section.
    Comment (18) is: Will there be any other supporting documentation 
posted to regulations.gov for this Notice?
    Answer: Yes. Additional files were posted on October 17, 2014. 
These include the proposed registration form and supporting statement.
    The Coast Guard is publishing an additional 60-day Notice for 
public commenting due to the time that has elapsed since the initial 
60-day Notice has published.

Information Collection Request

    Title: State Registration Data.
    OMB Control Number: 1625--NEW.

[[Page 85990]]

    Summary: This Notice provides information on the collection of 
registration data from the State reporting authorities.
    Need: Title 46 U.S.C. 12302 and 33 CFR 174.123 authorizes the 
collection of this information.
    Forms: CG-3923, State Registration Data.
    Respondents: 56 State reporting authorities respond.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Hour Burden Estimate: This is a new information collection request. 
The estimated burden is 42 hours a year.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: November 22, 2016.
Thomas P. Michelli,
 Chief Information Officer, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2016-28717 Filed 11-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2016 / Notices 85989

cited in 33 CFR 174.19 (which we are without oars, water skis, surfboards Answer: The proposed form would
required to implement by January 1, with or without sail, rafts, inflatable not be required for use until January 1,
2017). That being the case, what are the systems, and any device that moves on 2017. States would be asked to submit
Coast Guard’s intentions with regard to the surface of the water without being information on the historic form. If a
the version of the reporting form we will propelled by a motor, although it could State has already transitioned to the
need to use to make our annual be fit for installation or adaptation of new terms ahead of the January 1, 2017
reporting in 2015 and beyond? Will we some type of motor. Therefore, the deadline, the Coast Guard will accept
have the option to use the ‘‘older’’ proposed change creates an overburden registration data on either form.
version of the reporting form until such of conflicting definitions or wording to Comment (13) is: If there are
time that we have transitioned to the deal with in this case. Also, the removal variations in the version of the forms
new requirements? And, if required to of the proposed definitions leaves the employed by the states and submitted to
use the new form prior to that accident investigation protocol without the Coast Guard, how will the Coast
transition, how will the Coast Guard proper wording to aid in the Guard reconcile those differences in the
view any incomplete data that might not determination of felonies, infractions, or computation and report-out of
be able to be generated in the new misdemeanors committed. registration data?
format prior to completion of the Answer: This comment is outside the Answer: The Coast Guard will merge
transition? scope of this Notice requesting datasets if both the historic and
Answer: The form will not be required comments on this information proposed forms are used.
for use prior to January 1, 2017. collection. Please adhere to the In addition to the above comments
Comment (6) is: Knowing that hull definitions in 33 CFR 173.3 for use in submitted to the docket, the following
type, and more importantly engine drive this information collection. comments and questions were received
information can be important details in Comment (10) is: SS173.57: Same by Coast Guard program staff members:
better identifying and understanding the comment as in the previous paragraph. Comment (14) is: Is this just the
boating demographics within a state, Mainly, when evaluating marine events periodic request to approve the
what is the rationale for omitting this involving either vessels, watercrafts, or continuation of the collection of
information in this revised collection both. It may also affect the terms and registration data?
form? conditions of the memorandum of Answer: Yes.
Answer: The Coast Guard has not Comment (15) is: Has the Notice been
Agreement between the Government of
used the hull material or engine issued primarily (at this time) as part of
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and
information collected in prior the process to get OMB to issue a
the USCG under 14 U.S.C. SS2,89,141;
registration collections. Because we control number?
46 CFR SS13109 and 33 CFR SS100.01
have not used the data, we removed it Answer: Yes.
as to comply with 46 U.S.C. 13103(c)(2)
from the form so as to reduce the burden Comment (16) is: Is this in preparation
on the matter of marine events and boat
of data reporting on the States. for collection of registration data under
Comment (7) is: Do the estimates of accident reports procedures.
the ‘‘new’’ vessel terms authorized by
the form completion burden account for Answer: This collection of
the Final Rule on State Numbering
any initial burden in transitioning to information does not relate to marine
System (SNS), Vessel Identification
this revised reporting scheme? What is events or boat accident report
System (VIS), and Boating Accident
the basis for estimates of burden in procedures. Therefore, this comment is
Report Database (BARD) (eff. Jan 2017)?
items 12 and 13 of the Supporting outside the scope of this Notice
Answer: Yes. This form makes use of
Statement for the collection? requesting comments on the collection.
the ‘‘primary operation’’ and ‘‘vessel
Answer: No. The burden estimate took Comment (11) is: The definitions in type’’ in 33 Code of Federal Regulation
into account the collection of 33 CFR 181.3 do not include the 174.19.
information, which is based on the manufacturing of handmade vessels and Comment (17) is: Is there a revised
number of respondents, frequency of is inconsistent with SS181.23(b). It collection form that will accompany it?
form submission and an estimate of the should include person engaged in the Answer: Yes. There is a revised
time taken to fill out the form. manufacture of a boat for his or her own collection form that is greatly
Comment (8) is: Is there any use (operation) and not for sale. simplified. The proposed revision
relationship between this revision and Answer: This collection of provides instructions, a breakdown of
anticipated efforts to bring CFR into information is for all registered vessels. recreational vessel types by
agreement with the Uniform Certificate If a homemade vessel is registered, it motorization and length category, a
of Titling Act for Vessels should be included in the statistics. breakdown of commercial vessel types,
(UCOTA–V)? Comment (12) is: If a state has already and an administration section.
Answer: There is not a relationship transitioned—or will soon transition— Comment (18) is: Will there be any
between this revision and the UCOTA– its numbering system and the content of other supporting documentation posted
V efforts. the certificates of number over to the to regulations.gov for this Notice?
Comment (9) is: Under Puerto Rico requirements cited in 33 CFR 174.19 Answer: Yes. Additional files were
law, a Ship or vessel means any system (i.e., before the Jan. 1, 2017 posted on October 17, 2014. These
of transportation on water that has a implementation deadline), what version include the proposed registration form
motor installed, including, but without of the form is it suppose to use? If, as and supporting statement.
been limited to jet skis, motorized rafts, a result of the ICR, the OMB formally
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

The Coast Guard is publishing an
power sailboats, motor boats, or approves the collection and issues an additional 60-day Notice for public
powered driven boats of any sort, OMB Control Number to this revised commenting due to the time that has
including homemade vessels powered form 3923 before the Jan. 1, 2017 elapsed since the initial 60-day Notice
by motor, but excluding hydroplanes. A deadline for states to implement the has published.
watercraft means a mode of new requirements, will a state that does
transportation which does not have a not make the transition until the Information Collection Request
motor installed, such as rowboats, deadline be able to submit its data on Title: State Registration Data.
canoes, kayaks, sailboats with or the ‘‘old’’ version of the form? OMB Control Number: 1625—NEW.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Nov 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1
Document Created: 2016-11-29 00:33:12
Document Modified: 2016-11-29 00:33:12
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Sixty-day notice requesting comments.
Dates		Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before January 30, 2017.
Contact		Contact Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of Information Management, telephone 202-475-3532, or fax 202-372-8405, for questions on these documents.
FR Citation		81 FR 85987
81 FR 85987 - Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-NEW

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 229 (November 29, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
