81 FR 85997 - 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: FHA Single Family Model Mortgage Documents
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 229 (November 29, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 229 (November 29, 2016)
| Page Range | 85997-85999 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28756 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 85997-85999] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28756] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5913-C-34] 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: FHA Single Family Model Mortgage Documents AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner, HUD. ACTION: Correction; notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice corrects the document HUD published at 81 FR 84608, November 23, 2016. HUD is amending both paragraphs on page 4. HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment. DATES: Comments Due Date: January 30, 2017. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Colette Pollard, Reports Management Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 4176, Washington, DC 20410-5000; telephone 202-402-3400 (this is not a toll-free number) or email at [email protected] for a copy of the proposed forms or other available information. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Stevens, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; email [email protected]; or telephone 202- 402-2673. This is not a toll-free number. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A. A. Overview of Information Collection Title of Information Collection: FHA Single Family Model Mortgage Documents. OMB Approval Number: 2502--New. Type of Request: Approval of a new collection of information. Form Number: N/A. Description of the need for the information and proposed use: This notice advises of FHA's review and proposed revisions to the Single Family Model Forward Mortgage document. Similar to FHA's review of its multifamily mortgage transactional documents, healthcare facilities transactional documents, and hospital transactional documents, FHA is reviewing its Single Family mortgage transactional documents to determine where revisions and updates may be needed. This notice presents one document that FHA has identified for [[Page 85998]] review and update, and additional documents may be the subject of future notices for comment. Proposed Changes to the Model Forward Mortgage Document The following describes the changes proposed to be made to the Single Family Model Forward Mortgage document, which can be found, with the proposed changes to the document's terms highlighted, at HUD's Web site at http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/sfh/SFH_policy_drafts. Forward Mortgage The majority of the proposed changes are conforming or technical in nature (e.g., correction of internal references and typographical errors). Included in this category is the proposed change to Section 19. As provided in FHA's Instructions for Model Mortgages (located at http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/sfh/model_documents) the FHA Model Forward Mortgage document is based largely on the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association (the ``Government Sponsored Enterprises'' or ``GSEs'') security instrument covenants, with certain FHA-specific revisions. When incorporating the GSE covenants into the Model Forward Mortgage document, the second paragraph of Section 19 was unintentionally omitted, but reference to that paragraph was retained in the section heading, resulting in an apparent internal discrepancy in the Model Forward Mortgage. Because the omission of this paragraph was not identified as an FHA-Specific Modification (as that term is used in the Instructions for Model Mortgages), mortgagees have been free to adopt the analogous GSE covenant provision to resolve this discrepancy. Therefore, although the proposed change to Section 19 appear substantive, it should bring the Model Forward Mortgage into closer conformity with current FHA-insured mortgages and industry standard. In addition to these technical changes, FHA is proposing one set of substantive changes to the Model Forward Mortgage, reflected in the judicial and non-judicial versions of Section 22 (hereinafter ``Sections 22'') and Section 20. Prior to the September, 2014 publication of the current Model Forward Mortgage, the former Model Forward Mortgage contained the following provision: ``[i]n many circumstances regulations issued by the Secretary will limit Lender rights, in the case of payment defaults, to require immediate payment in full and foreclose if not paid. This Security Instrument does not authorize acceleration or foreclosure if not permitted by regulations of the Secretary.'' (hereinafter ``Paragraph 9(d)''). Because Paragraph 9(d) is not necessarily entailed by FHA regulatory or statutory authority, its omission was a natural consequence of the adoption of the GSE security instrument covenants. Mortgagees are obliged to fulfill their contractual and regulatory obligations to the Department, including commencing foreclosure upon satisfaction of certain regulatory preconditions, regardless of whether certain of those obligations are recited in or incorporated by reference into a separate mortgage contract with a borrower. Since publication of the current FHA Model Forward Mortgage, however, FHA has been informed that Paragraph 9(d) has been viewed by borrowers as providing certain defenses to foreclosure actions, and has, on occasion, been successfully used to assert such defenses under circumstances where mortgagees allegedly fail to satisfy certain preconditions to foreclosure reflected in the Department's regulations. The Department's regulations form the contract of mortgage insurance between FHA and the mortgagee, which has always been regarded as separate and distinct from the private mortgage contract between mortgagee and borrower. However, the Department also acknowledges the incidental benefits of incentivizing mortgagee compliance with FHA requirements by incorporation of a similar, separate contractual right in the private mortgage contract between the mortgagee and borrower. The reintroduction of language in the proposed change to Sections 22 similar to that contained in the previous Paragraph 9(d) may serve to again further this goal. The Department is also proposing a revision to Section 20, which generally provides that the borrower is not a third-party beneficiary to the contract of mortgage insurance between the lender and FHA. Legally, FHA borrowers have never been deemed third-party beneficiaries of the mortgage insurance contract between FHA and the mortgagee, and therefore, have had no authority to enforce any provisions thereof. However, as reflected in the proposed changes to Sections 22, the borrower and lender will enjoy contractual rights and obligations under the private mortgage contract that happen to mirror elements of the mortgage insurance contract because they both separately rely on HUD's regulations. By asserting rights under the private mortgage contract, even those that incorporate elements of the regulations forming the mortgage insurance contract, borrowers would not be enforcing the contract of mortgage insurance and FHA regulations as such, but rather enforcing the private contractual terms incorporated into the mortgage contract that mirror those regulations. While aiming to clearly delineate the lines between the private mortgage contract and the contract of mortgage insurance through the language contained in Section 20, the Department does not wish to cause any confusion concerning the borrower's ability to enforce his or her rights that have been granted through the incorporation of certain regulatory provisions. Therefore, for clarity, the Department is proposing a revision to Section 20 that eliminates any confusion regarding the borrower's ability to assert rights under the private mortgage contract with the mortgagee as provided in the proposed changes to Section 22. The proposed revision to Section 20 does not jeopardize the settled fact that borrowers are not third-party beneficiaries of the mortgage insurance contract and do not have the authority to enforce any provisions thereof. This is a consequence of well-established legal principals governing contractual relationships and privity, which will remain unchanged notwithstanding the proposed revision. HUD expects, therefore, that the proposed change renders Section 20 more apparently consistent with the proposed changes to Sections 22, but does not intend to create third-party rights under the mortgage insurance contract. The following information regarding respondents and number of responses is based on information related to the actual legal mortgage document, not the model mortgage document. Affected Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit. Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,535. Estimated Number of Responses: 164,447. Frequency of Response: On Occasion. Average Hours per Response: .05. Total Estimated Burdens: 822 hours. B. Solicitation of Public Comment This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the [[Page 85999]] proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. Dated: November 23, 2016. Janet M. Golrick, Associate General Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Housing Associate Deputy Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. 2016-28756 Filed 11-28-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2016 / Notices 85997
II. Proposed Method of Determining percent of AMI, due to the higher HUD is seeking approval from the Office
Income Limit housing costs in this MSA. of Management and Budget (OMB) for
HUD calculates low-, very low-, and HUD’s income limits were developed the information collection described
extremely low-income limits for the by HUD’s Office of Policy Development below. In accordance with the
public housing program. These income and Research, and are updated Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
limits are used for assessing program annually. Information about HUD’s requesting comment from all interested
eligibility. Very low-income (VLI) limits income limits and HUD’s methodology parties on the proposed collection of
are preliminarily calculated as 50 for adjusting income limits as part of the information. The purpose of this notice
percent of the estimated area median income limit calculation can be found is to allow for 60 days of public
family income. VLI limits include at: https://www.huduser.gov//datasets/ comment.
several adjustments to align the income il/il16/index_il2016.html. DATES: Comments Due Date: January 30,
limits with program requirements III. Request for Comments 2017.
including: HUD is seeking comments on the ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
1. High Housing Cost Adjustment. The methodology described above. invited to submit comments regarding
4-Person VLI limit is increased if it Specifically, HUD seeks comments on this proposal. Comments should refer to
would otherwise be less than the the following questions: the proposal by name and/or OMB
amount at which 35 percent of it equals 1. Does the methodology adequately Control Number and should be sent to:
85 percent of the annualized two- consider local housing costs and make Colette Pollard, Reports Management
bedroom Section 8 40th percentile FMR appropriate adjustments for higher Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
(this adjusts income limits upward for housing costs? and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
areas where rental housing costs are 2. What other factors should HUD SW., Room 4176, Washington, DC
unusually high in relation to median consider when determining whether to 20410–5000; telephone 202–402–3400
income). make adjustments to the income limit? (this is not a toll-free number) or email
2. Low Housing Cost Adjustment. If Please provide specific examples of at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov for a copy of
the 4-person VLI limit exceeds 80 circumstances that are not captured in the proposed forms or other available
percent of the U.S. median family HUD’s proposed methodology. information. Persons with hearing or
income, and the two bedroom 40th speech impairments may access this
percentile FMR is affordable (less than IV. Environmental Impact Certification number through TTY by calling the toll-
or equal to 30 percent of the preliminary This notice does not direct, provide free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
VLI limit), the VLI limit will be reduced for assistance or loan and mortgage 8339.
to the greater of 80 percent of U.S. insurance for, or otherwise govern or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
median family income or the amount at regulate real property acquisition, Kevin Stevens, 451 7th Street SW.,
which 30 percent of it equals the two- disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, Washington, DC 20410; email
bedroom 40th percentile FMR. This alteration, demolition, or new KevinL.Stevens@hud.gov; or telephone
adjusts income limits downward for construction; or establish, revise, or 202–402–2673. This is not a toll-free
areas of unusually high median family provide for standards for construction or number. Persons with hearing or speech
incomes. construction materials, manufactured impairments may access this number
3. State Non-Metro Median Family housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, through TTY by calling the toll-free
Income Adjustment. The 4-person VLI under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this notice is Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
limit is also adjusted if it would categorically excluded from SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
otherwise be lower than 50 percent of environmental review under the notice informs the public that HUD is
the State non-metro median family National Environmental Policy Act of seeking approval from OMB for the
income; and 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321). information collection described in
4. Ceilings and Floors for Changes. In Dated: November 17, 2016. Section A.
lieu of holding income limits harmless,
Jemine Bryon,
HUD does not allow income limits to A. Overview of Information Collection
General Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Public
decrease or increase more than 5 Title of Information Collection: FHA
and Indian Housing.
percent. The VLI limits are calculated Single Family Model Mortgage
[FR Doc. 2016–28593 Filed 11–28–16; 8:45 am]
for every FMR area, so there may be Documents.
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
subareas for metropolitan statistical OMB Approval Number: 2502—New.
areas (MSAs). Type of Request: Approval of a new
For the purpose of determining the collection of information.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
income limit, including any Form Number: N/A.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
adjustments, HUD will use the VLI limit Description of the need for the
as the basis of the 120 percent income [Docket No. FR–5913–C–34] information and proposed use:
limit (by multiplying the VLI limit by a This notice advises of FHA’s review
factor of 2.4). For those areas without an 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information and proposed revisions to the Single
adjustment, the result is an income limit Collection: FHA Single Family Model Family Model Forward Mortgage
of 120 percent of AMI. For areas where Mortgage Documents document. Similar to FHA’s review of
HUD has made an adjustment to the VLI its multifamily mortgage transactional
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
limit, the result of the multiplier will be Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing documents, healthcare facilities
higher or lower than 120 percent of Commissioner, HUD. transactional documents, and hospital
AMI, depending on the adjustments ACTION: Correction; notice. transactional documents, FHA is
made. For example, for the Los Angeles reviewing its Single Family mortgage
MSA, HUD’s income limit methodology SUMMARY: This notice corrects the transactional documents to determine
results in a high housing cost document HUD published at 81 FR where revisions and updates may be
adjustment, therefore, the income limit 84608, November 23, 2016. HUD is needed. This notice presents one
for families residing in this area is 167 amending both paragraphs on page 4. document that FHA has identified for
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Nov 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_86226/page/1.svg)
![85998 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2016 / Notices
review and update, and additional case of payment defaults, to require they both separately rely on HUD’s
documents may be the subject of future immediate payment in full and foreclose regulations. By asserting rights under
notices for comment. if not paid. This Security Instrument the private mortgage contract, even
does not authorize acceleration or those that incorporate elements of the
Proposed Changes to the Model
foreclosure if not permitted by regulations forming the mortgage
Forward Mortgage Document
regulations of the Secretary.’’ insurance contract, borrowers would not
The following describes the changes (hereinafter ‘‘Paragraph 9(d)’’). Because be enforcing the contract of mortgage
proposed to be made to the Single Paragraph 9(d) is not necessarily insurance and FHA regulations as such,
Family Model Forward Mortgage entailed by FHA regulatory or statutory but rather enforcing the private
document, which can be found, with the authority, its omission was a natural contractual terms incorporated into the
proposed changes to the document’s consequence of the adoption of the GSE mortgage contract that mirror those
terms highlighted, at HUD’s Web site at security instrument covenants. regulations.
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/ Mortgagees are obliged to fulfill their While aiming to clearly delineate the
HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/sfh/ contractual and regulatory obligations to lines between the private mortgage
SFH_policy_drafts. the Department, including commencing contract and the contract of mortgage
Forward Mortgage foreclosure upon satisfaction of certain insurance through the language
regulatory preconditions, regardless of contained in Section 20, the Department
The majority of the proposed changes whether certain of those obligations are does not wish to cause any confusion
are conforming or technical in nature recited in or incorporated by reference concerning the borrower’s ability to
(e.g., correction of internal references into a separate mortgage contract with a enforce his or her rights that have been
and typographical errors). Included in borrower. granted through the incorporation of
this category is the proposed change to Since publication of the current FHA certain regulatory provisions. Therefore,
Section 19. As provided in FHA’s Model Forward Mortgage, however, for clarity, the Department is proposing
Instructions for Model Mortgages FHA has been informed that Paragraph a revision to Section 20 that eliminates
(located at http://portal.hud.gov/ 9(d) has been viewed by borrowers as any confusion regarding the borrower’s
hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/ providing certain defenses to ability to assert rights under the private
housing/sfh/model_documents) the foreclosure actions, and has, on mortgage contract with the mortgagee as
FHA Model Forward Mortgage occasion, been successfully used to provided in the proposed changes to
document is based largely on the assert such defenses under
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Section 22. The proposed revision to
circumstances where mortgagees Section 20 does not jeopardize the
Corporation and Federal National allegedly fail to satisfy certain
Mortgage Association (the ‘‘Government settled fact that borrowers are not third-
preconditions to foreclosure reflected in party beneficiaries of the mortgage
Sponsored Enterprises’’ or ‘‘GSEs’’) the Department’s regulations. The
security instrument covenants, with insurance contract and do not have the
Department’s regulations form the authority to enforce any provisions
certain FHA-specific revisions. When contract of mortgage insurance between
incorporating the GSE covenants into thereof. This is a consequence of well-
FHA and the mortgagee, which has established legal principals governing
the Model Forward Mortgage document, always been regarded as separate and
the second paragraph of Section 19 was contractual relationships and privity,
distinct from the private mortgage which will remain unchanged
unintentionally omitted, but reference contract between mortgagee and
to that paragraph was retained in the notwithstanding the proposed revision.
borrower. However, the Department also HUD expects, therefore, that the
section heading, resulting in an acknowledges the incidental benefits of
apparent internal discrepancy in the proposed change renders Section 20
incentivizing mortgagee compliance more apparently consistent with the
Model Forward Mortgage. Because the with FHA requirements by
omission of this paragraph was not proposed changes to Sections 22, but
incorporation of a similar, separate does not intend to create third-party
identified as an FHA-Specific contractual right in the private mortgage
Modification (as that term is used in the rights under the mortgage insurance
contract between the mortgagee and contract.
Instructions for Model Mortgages), borrower. The reintroduction of
mortgagees have been free to adopt the The following information regarding
language in the proposed change to respondents and number of responses is
analogous GSE covenant provision to Sections 22 similar to that contained in
resolve this discrepancy. Therefore, based on information related to the
the previous Paragraph 9(d) may serve actual legal mortgage document, not the
although the proposed change to to again further this goal.
Section 19 appear substantive, it should model mortgage document.
The Department is also proposing a Affected Respondents: Businesses or
bring the Model Forward Mortgage into revision to Section 20, which generally other for-profit.
closer conformity with current FHA- provides that the borrower is not a Estimated Number of Respondents:
insured mortgages and industry third-party beneficiary to the contract of 2,535.
standard. mortgage insurance between the lender Estimated Number of Responses:
In addition to these technical changes, and FHA. Legally, FHA borrowers have 164,447.
FHA is proposing one set of substantive never been deemed third-party Frequency of Response: On Occasion.
changes to the Model Forward beneficiaries of the mortgage insurance Average Hours per Response: .05.
Mortgage, reflected in the judicial and contract between FHA and the Total Estimated Burdens: 822 hours.
non-judicial versions of Section 22 mortgagee, and therefore, have had no
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(hereinafter ‘‘Sections 22’’) and Section authority to enforce any provisions B. Solicitation of Public Comment
20. Prior to the September, 2014 thereof. However, as reflected in the This notice is soliciting comments
publication of the current Model proposed changes to Sections 22, the from members of the public and affected
Forward Mortgage, the former Model borrower and lender will enjoy parties concerning the collection of
Forward Mortgage contained the contractual rights and obligations under information described in Section A on
following provision: ‘‘[i]n many the private mortgage contract that the following:
circumstances regulations issued by the happen to mirror elements of the (1) Whether the proposed collection
Secretary will limit Lender rights, in the mortgage insurance contract because of information is necessary for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Nov 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_86226/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2016 / Notices 85999
proper performance of the functions of ACTION: Notice; request for comments. collaborated with, or would like to
the agency, including whether the collaborate with; their organizational
information will have practical utility; SUMMARY: We (U.S. Fish and Wildlife
type, size, and location; and where in
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s Service) will ask the Office of
the U.S. Pacific Northwest region they
estimate of the burden of the proposed Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve the information collection (IC) operate. The survey results will provide
collection of information; information about where, how, and with
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, described below. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and whom organizations working on coastal
utility, and clarity of the information to
as part of our continuing efforts to ecosystem issues focus their efforts, and
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of reduce paperwork and respondent will be used to facilitate opportunities
the collection of information on those burden, we invite the general public and for improved coordination and
who are to respond; including through other Federal agencies to take this collaboration to enhance the collective
the use of appropriate automated opportunity to comment on this IC. We impact of organizations working to
collection techniques or other forms of may not conduct or sponsor and a protect and restore the health of U.S.
information technology, e.g., permitting person is not required to respond to a Pacific Northwest coastal watersheds,
electronic submission of responses. collection of information unless it estuaries, and associated ecosystems,
HUD encourages interested parties to displays a currently valid OMB control and the communities that value, use,
submit comment in response to these number. and depend on these resources.
questions. DATES: To ensure that we are able to
consider your comments on this IC, we II. Data
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. must receive them by January 30, 2017. OMB Control Number: 1018–None.
Dated: November 23, 2016. ADDRESSES: Send your comments on the
IC to the Information Collection Title: Pacific Northwest Coastal
Janet M. Golrick, Landscape Conservation Design Social
Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and
Associate General Deputy Assistant, Secretary Network Survey.
for Housing Associate Deputy Federal Wildlife Service, MS BPHC, 5275
Housing Commissioner. Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– Service Form Number: None.
[FR Doc. 2016–28756 Filed 11–28–16; 8:45 am]
3803 (mail); or tina_campbell@fws.gov Type of Request: New.
(email). Please include ‘‘1018–PNW’’ in
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
the subject line of your comments. Description of Respondents:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
Businesses, nongovernmental
request additional information about organizations, local and county
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR governments, State and tribal
this IC, contact Tina Campbell at tina_
campbell@fws.gov (email) or 703–358– governments, Federal agencies, and
Fish and Wildlife Service
2676 (telephone). educational institutions.
[FWS–R1–SA–2016–N206; FF01SNPLC0–
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
FXSC141001NPLC0–178]
I. Abstract Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Proposed Information Collection;
Pacific Northwest Coastal Landscape We will collect information on
Conservation Design Social Network organizations’ approaches to landscape
scale conservation; their capacities,
Survey
priorities, strategies, and approaches to
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, collaboration; what other organizations
Interior. they have sought advice from,
Completion
Number of Number of time per Total annual
Activity respondents responses response burden hours
(minutes)
Survey .............................................................................................................. 200 180 30 90
Totals ........................................................................................................ 200 180 30 90
Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden • Ways to minimize the burden of the While you can ask us in your comment
Cost: None. collection of information on to withhold your personal identifying
III. Comments respondents. information from public review, we
Comments that you submit in cannot guarantee that we will be able to
We invite comments concerning this do so.
information collection on: response to this notice are a matter of
• Whether or not the collection of public record. We will include or Dated: November 22, 2016.
summarize each comment in our request
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
information is necessary, including Tina A. Campbell,
whether or not the information will to OMB to approve this IC. Before
Chief, Division of Policy, Performance, and
have practical utility; including your address, phone number, Management Programs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
• The accuracy of our estimate of the email address, or other personal Service.
burden for this collection of identifying information in your [FR Doc. 2016–28648 Filed 11–28–16; 8:45 am]
information; comment, you should be aware that
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility, your entire comment, including your
and clarity of the information to be personal identifying information, may
collected; and be made publicly available at any time.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Nov 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_86226/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-11-29 00:33:34
Document Modified: 2016-11-29 00:33:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Correction; notice. | |
| Contact | Kevin Stevens, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; email [email protected]; or telephone 202- 402-2673. This is not a toll-free number. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 85997 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR