81 FR 86977 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 232 (December 2, 2016)

Page Range		86977-86979
FR Document		2016-28620

We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of a 13.4-inch crack in the left wing front spar web inboard of pylon number 2 between front spar station inboard (FSSI) 655.75 and FSSI 660, found following a fuel leak. This proposed AD would require repetitive detailed, ultrasonic, and high frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the front spar web between FSSI 628 and FSSI 713, and repairs if necessary. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 232 (Friday, December 2, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 232 (Friday, December 2, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 86977-86979]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9394; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-162-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 
The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F airplanes. 
This proposed AD was prompted by a report of a 13.4-inch crack in the 
left wing front spar web inboard of pylon number 2 between front spar 
station inboard (FSSI) 655.75 and FSSI 660, found following a fuel 
leak. This proposed AD would require repetitive detailed, ultrasonic, 
and high frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the front 
spar web between FSSI 628 and FSSI 713, and repairs if necessary. We 
are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these 
products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 17, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740; telephone 
562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this 
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the 
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also 
available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching 
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9394.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9394; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments 
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket 
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6428; fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed 
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9394; 
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-162-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received a report indicating that a fuel leak in one 
airplane led to the discovery of a 13.4-inch crack in the left wing 
front spar web inboard of pylon number 2 between FSSI 655.75 and FSSI 
660. The airplane had accumulated 13,909 total flight cycles and 
107,151 total flight hours. This condition, if not corrected, could 
result in fuel leaks and a consequent fire.

[[Page 86978]]

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-57A2357, dated 
September 12, 2016. The service information describes procedures for 
repetitive detailed, ultrasonic, and high frequency eddy current 
inspections, and repairs of cracking of the front spar web between FSSI 
628 and FSSI 713. This service information is reasonably available 
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal 
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant 
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is 
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified 
in the service information described previously, except as discussed 
under ``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service 
Information.'' For information on the procedures and compliance times, 
see this service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching 
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9394.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-57A2357, dated September 12, 
2016, specifies to contact the manufacturer for certain instructions, 
but this proposed AD would require using repair methods, modification 
deviations, and alteration deviations in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the 
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial 
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have 
authorized to make those findings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 137 airplanes of U.S. 
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed 
AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                Cost on U.S.
          Action                   Labor cost           Parts cost      Cost per product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections..............  55 work-hours x $85 per                $0  $4,675 per            $640,475 per
                            hour = $4,675 per                          inspection cycle.     inspection cycle.
                            inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide 
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed 
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2016-9394; Directorate Identifier 
2016-NM-162-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by January 17, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-
400D, and 747-400F airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of a 13.4-inch crack in the 
left wing front spar web inboard of pylon number 2 between front 
spar station inboard (FSSI) 655.75 and FSSI 660, found following a 
fuel leak. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in 
the front spar web, which could lead to fuel leaks and a consequent 
fire.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Detailed, Ultrasonic, and High Frequency Eddy Current 
Inspections

    At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., 
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-57A2357, dated 
September 12, 2016, except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD, 
do detailed, ultrasonic, and high frequency eddy current

[[Page 86979]]

inspections for any cracking in the front spar web, in accordance 
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 747-57A2357, dated September 12, 2016. Repeat the 
inspections thereafter at the applicable time specified in paragraph 
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-57A2357, 
dated September 12, 2016.

(h) Repair of Any Cracking

    If any crack is found during any inspection required by 
paragraph (g) of this AD, before further flight, repair using a 
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in 
paragraph (j) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the inspections 
specified by paragraph (g) of this AD at all unrepaired areas.

(i) Service Information Exceptions

    Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 747-57A2357, dated September 12, 2016, specifies a 
compliance time ``after the original date of this service 
bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified 
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local 
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 
attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. 
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the 
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the 
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must 
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must 
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) Except as required by paragraph (i) of this AD: For service 
information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for 
Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and 
(j)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step 
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply 
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the 
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is 
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and 
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted 
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection 
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC 
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done 
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy 
condition.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Nathan Weigand, 
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6428; 
fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services 
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740; 
telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
425-227-1221.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 17, 2016.
Phil Forde,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-28620 Filed 12-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2016 / Proposed Rules 86977

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION www.regulations.gov by searching for
request to your principal inspector or local and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
Flight Standards District Office, as Federal Aviation Administration 9394.
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 14 CFR Part 39 Examining the AD Docket
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport [Docket No. FAA–2016–9394; Directorate You may examine the AD docket on
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Identifier 2016–NM–162–AD] the Internet at http://
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; RIN 2120–AA64
www.regulations.gov by searching for
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149. and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 9394; or in person at the Docket
AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using Company Airplanes Management Facility between 9 a.m.
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
principal inspector, or lacking a principal AGENCY: Federal Aviation except Federal holidays. The AD docket
inspector, the manager of the local flight Administration (FAA), DOT. contains this proposed AD, the
standards district office/certificate holding ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking regulatory evaluation, any comments
district office. (NPRM). received, and other information. The
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any street address for the Docket Office
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new (phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
actions from a manufacturer, the action must airworthiness directive (AD) for all The ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
be accomplished using a method approved Boeing Company Model 747–400, 747–
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– available in the AD docket shortly after
400D, and 747–400F airplanes. This receipt.
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or proposed AD was prompted by a report
EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
of a 13.4-inch crack in the left wing
by the DOA, the approval must include the Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
front spar web inboard of pylon number
DOA-authorized signature. Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
2 between front spar station inboard
(FSSI) 655.75 and FSSI 660, found Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: If
any service information contains procedures following a fuel leak. This proposed AD (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
or tests that are identified as RC, those would require repetitive detailed, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6428;
procedures and tests must be done to comply ultrasonic, and high frequency eddy fax: 425–917–6590; email:
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are current inspections for cracking of the nathan.p.weigand@faa.gov.
not identified as RC are recommended. Those front spar web between FSSI 628 and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
procedures and tests that are not identified FSSI 713, and repairs if necessary. We
as RC may be deviated from using accepted are proposing this AD to address the Comments Invited
methods in accordance with the operator’s unsafe condition on these products.
maintenance or inspection program without We invite you to send any written
DATES: We must receive comments on
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided relevant data, views, or arguments about
the procedures and tests identified as RC can this proposed AD by January 17, 2017.
this proposal. Send your comments to
be done and the airplane can be put back in ADDRESSES: You may send comments, an address listed under the ADDRESSES
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or using the procedures found in 14 CFR section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
changes to procedures or tests identified as 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 2016–9394; Directorate Identifier 2016–
RC require approval of an AMOC. methods: NM–162–AD’’ at the beginning of your
(j) Related Information • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to comments. We specifically invite
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the comments on the overall regulatory,
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing instructions for submitting comments.
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA economic, environmental, and energy
• Fax: 202–493–2251. aspects of this proposed AD. We will
Airworthiness Directive 2016–0106, dated
June 6, 2016, for related information. This
• Mail: U.S. Department of consider all comments received by the
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Transportation, Docket Operations, closing date and may amend this
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by M–30, West Building Ground Floor, proposed AD because of those
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA– Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey comments.
2016–9431. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
(2) For service information identified in • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail We will post all comments we
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness address above between 9 a.m. and 5 receive, without change, to http://
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice p.m., Monday through Friday, except www.regulations.gov, including any
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; Federal holidays. personal information you provide. We
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 For service information identified in will also post a report summarizing each
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial substantive verbal contact we receive
airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com. Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data about this proposed AD.
You may view this service information at the Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Discussion
Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
90740; telephone 562–797–1717; We have received a report indicating
Internet https:// that a fuel leak in one airplane led to the
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view discovery of a 13.4-inch crack in the left
Issued in Renton, Washington, on this referenced service information at wing front spar web inboard of pylon
November 16, 2016. the FAA, Transport Airplane number 2 between FSSI 655.75 and
Phil Forde, Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., FSSI 660. The airplane had accumulated
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Renton, WA. For information on the 13,909 total flight cycles and 107,151
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. availability of this material at the FAA, total flight hours. This condition, if not
[FR Doc. 2016–28621 Filed 12–1–16; 8:45 am] call 425–227–1221. It is also available corrected, could result in fuel leaks and
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P on the internet at http:// a consequent fire.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:02 Dec 01, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM 02DEP1

86978 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2016 / Proposed Rules

Related Service Information Under develop in other products of the same specifies to contact the manufacturer for
1 CFR Part 51 type design. certain instructions, but this proposed
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service AD would require using repair methods,
Proposed AD Requirements
Bulletin 747–57A2357, dated September modification deviations, and alteration
12, 2016. The service information This proposed AD would require deviations in one of the following ways:
describes procedures for repetitive accomplishing the actions specified in • In accordance with a method that
detailed, ultrasonic, and high frequency the service information described we approve; or
eddy current inspections, and repairs of previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between this Proposed AD • Using data that meet the
cracking of the front spar web between certification basis of the airplane, and
FSSI 628 and FSSI 713. This service and the Service Information.’’ For
information on the procedures and that have been approved by the Boeing
information is reasonably available
compliance times, see this service Commercial Airplanes Organization
because the interested parties have
information at http:// Designation Authorization (ODA) whom
access to it through their normal course
www.regulations.gov by searching for we have authorized to make those
of business or by the means identified
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– findings.
in the ADDRESSES section.
9394. Costs of Compliance
FAA’s Determination
Differences Between This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we We estimate that this proposed AD
and the Service Information
evaluated all the relevant information affects 137 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
and determined the unsafe condition Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747– estimate the following costs to comply
described previously is likely to exist or 57A2357, dated September 12, 2016, with this proposed AD:

ESTIMATED COSTS
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators

Inspections ........ 55 work-hours × $85 per hour = $4,675 per inspec- $0 $4,675 per inspection $640,475 per inspection
tion cycle. cycle. cycle.

We have received no definitive data responsibilities among the various The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
that would enable us to provide cost levels of government. 2016–9394; Directorate Identifier 2016–
estimates for the on-condition actions For the reasons discussed above, I NM–162–AD.
specified in this proposed AD. certify this proposed regulation: (a) Comments Due Date
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory We must receive comments by January 17,
Authority for This Rulemaking action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 2017.
Title 49 of the United States Code (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue the DOT Regulatory Policies and (b) Affected ADs
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, None.
section 106, describes the authority of 1979), (c) Applicability
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and This AD applies to all The Boeing
Aviation Programs, describes in more Company Model 747–400, 747–400D, and
detail the scope of the Agency’s (4) Will not have a significant
747–400F airplanes, certificated in any
authority. economic impact, positive or negative,
category.
We are issuing this rulemaking under on a substantial number of small entities
the authority described in Subtitle VII, under the criteria of the Regulatory (d) Subject
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: Flexibility Act. Air Transport Association (ATA) of
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that America Code 57, Wings.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
section, Congress charges the FAA with (e) Unsafe Condition
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference, This AD was prompted by a report of a
air commerce by prescribing regulations 13.4-inch crack in the left wing front spar
Safety.
for practices, methods, and procedures web inboard of pylon number 2 between
the Administrator finds necessary for The Proposed Amendment front spar station inboard (FSSI) 655.75 and
safety in air commerce. This regulation FSSI 660, found following a fuel leak. We are
Accordingly, under the authority issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking
is within the scope of that authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
because it addresses an unsafe condition in the front spar web, which could lead to
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part fuel leaks and a consequent fire.
that is likely to exist or develop on 39 as follows:
products identified in this rulemaking (f) Compliance
action. PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Comply with this AD within the
DIRECTIVES compliance times specified, unless already
Regulatory Findings done.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

We determined that this proposed AD ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 (g) Repetitive Detailed, Ultrasonic, and High
would not have federalism implications continues to read as follows: Frequency Eddy Current Inspections
under Executive Order 13132. This Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. At the applicable time specified in
proposed AD would not have a paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
substantial direct effect on the States, on § 39.13 [Amended]
Alert Service Bulletin 747–57A2357, dated
the relationship between the national ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding September 12, 2016, except as provided by
Government and the States, or on the the following new airworthiness paragraph (i) of this AD, do detailed,
distribution of power and directive (AD): ultrasonic, and high frequency eddy current

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:02 Dec 01, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM 02DEP1

Document Created: 2018-02-14 09:02:06
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 09:02:06

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Dates		We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 17, 2017.
Contact		Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917- 6428; fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 86977
RIN Number		2120-AA64
CFR Associated		Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety

81 FR 86977 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 232 (December 2, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration