81 FR 87412 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 233 (December 5, 2016)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 233 (December 5, 2016)
| Page Range | 87412-87417 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28337 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 87412-87417] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28337] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2013-0215; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-132-AD; Amendment 39-18665; AD 2016-19-16] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes; and certain Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report indicating that a cam latch on the main cargo door (MCD) broke during flight. This AD requires various inspections and related investigative and corrective actions, if necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective January 9, 2017. [[Page 87413]] The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of January 9, 2017. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013- 0215. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013- 0215; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647- 5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Farina, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-150L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5344; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes; and certain Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2013 (78 FR 18922) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by a report indicating that a cam latch on the MCD broke during flight. The NPRM proposed to require performing repetitive inspections of the MCD cam latches; replacing cam latches, certain bolts, and door hinge fittings; performing related investigative and corrective actions, if necessary; and rigging the MCD. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct discrepancies of the cam latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts, which could reduce the structural integrity of the MCD, and result in potential loss of the cargo door and rapid decompression of the airplane. Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued Since we issued the NPRM, we have reviewed Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707- 300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes). (We referred to Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, dated February 6, 2012; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, dated January 30, 2012; as the appropriate sources of service information for accomplishing the actions specified in the NPRM.) Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015; clarify the inspection conditions and the corrective actions for certain conditions. Certain inspections of the cam latches and latch pins were changed from detailed inspections to general visual inspections. Also, a detailed inspection of mating parts and immediately adjacent cam latches and latch pins for any cracks or any gouges in critical areas was added to certain corrective actions specified in the service information. Also, the corrective actions for latch pin extensions that are between 0.84 and 0.89 inch or between 0.91 and 0.94 inch were changed. Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015; specify replacement of any discrepant latch pin and a detailed inspection of the mating cam latch for any cracks or gouges in lieu of the repetitive detailed inspections described in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, dated February 6, 2012; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, dated January 30, 2012. Explanation of Certain Changes to This AD In light of the issuance of the revised service information discussed previously, we have revised paragraphs (c), (g), and (h) of this AD to refer to Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727- 52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015. We have also added new paragraph (l) of this AD to give credit for doing actions before the effective date of this AD using Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, dated February 6, 2012; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727- 52A0150, dated January 30, 2012. In addition, we have removed the Optional Terminating Action, which was paragraph (m) in the proposed AD, and moved that information into paragraph (g)(2) of this AD to align with the revised service information. We have redesignated subsequent paragraphs accordingly. In addition, since certain inspections and conditions were revised in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015; we have revised the description of the actions required by this AD to correspond with the terminology used in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015. As a result, certain paragraphs in the proposed AD have been rearranged, and the corresponding paragraph identifiers have been redesignated in this AD, as listed in the following table: Revised Paragraph Identifiers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Corresponding requirement in Action in the NPRM this AD ------------------------------------------------------------------------ paragraph (g)............................. paragraph (g)(1). paragraph (h)............................. paragraph (g)(2). paragraph (i)............................. paragraph (h). paragraph (j)............................. paragraph (h). paragraph (k)............................. paragraph (k). paragraph (l)............................. paragraph (i). paragraph (m)............................. paragraph (g)(2). paragraph (n)............................. paragraph (j). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ We have also revised the Costs of Compliance section in this final rule to reflect the number of work-hours specified in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015. We have also included the costs for the repetitive inspections required before the MCD rigging check as well as replacement of the alloy cross bolts; these costs were inadvertently omitted from the NPRM. In addition, we have included the costs for the concurrent actions in Boeing [[Page 87414]] 707/720 Service Bulletin 3477, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993; and Boeing Service Bulletin 727-52-0142, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. FedEx Express had no objection to the NPRM. Request for Clarification of Requirements Boeing stated that it was difficult to align the requirements proposed in paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j) and (l) of the proposed AD with the actions described in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, dated February 6, 2012; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, dated January 30, 2012. Boeing commented that it is not clear which requirements in the proposed AD go with which section of table 1 and table 2 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, dated January 30, 2012. Boeing expressed concern that the proposed AD does not include all of the items in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, dated January 30, 2012. Boeing suggested that the proposed AD be rewritten so operators are not confused with unclear compliance requirements, which might cause situations of non-compliance. Boeing also requested that paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3)(i), and (h)(3)(ii) of the proposed AD be rewritten to improve clarity because words were omitted that might lead to confusion or misinterpretation of the requirements in the proposed AD. We agree that the description of the parts to be inspected and the required tasks should be consistent throughout this final rule and should match what is described in the Boeing service information. With the exception of paragraph (l)(2) of this AD, we are requiring only actions that are described in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015. We have revised paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (j) of this AD accordingly. For clarity we have moved the ``Concurrent Actions'' paragraph of the proposed AD (paragraph (l) of the proposed AD) before the ``Exceptions to Service Information Specifications'' paragraph (paragraph (k) of the proposed AD). In this AD, the ``Concurrent Actions'' paragraph is redesignated as paragraph (i) of this AD. Request To Revise Intervals for Repetitive Inspections The United States Air Force Joint STARS (Joint STARS) program stated that its concern is that the NPRM addresses only airplanes that are frequently used to haul cargo. For operators that do not haul cargo and typically only open the MCD for C-check inspections, the general visual inspections required every 330 flight cycles or 150 days is excessive. This commenter stated that these repetitive inspections do not fit into the current Joint STARS maintenance program and would result in airplane downtime and additional cost. This commenter noted that detailed inspections every 3,000 flight cycles or 24 months, and high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections every 6,000 flight cycles or 48 months, would fit into its current maintenance schedule and not cause a significant impact. We agree that the required intervals for repetitive inspections may not be appropriate for some operators because they infrequently use the cargo door. However, we disagree with revising the intervals for the repetitive inspections required by this AD. We need to evaluate the requests for different inspection intervals on a case-by-case basis, based on the operator and its use of the MCD. Operators may request a change in the intervals for the repetitive inspections by following the procedures in paragraph (m) of this AD and requesting approval of an alternative method of compliance. We also note that the FAA has limited oversight of public aircraft operations (PAO). The government entity conducting the PAO is responsible for oversight of the operations, including aircraft airworthiness. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727- 52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015. This service information describes procedures for doing a general visual inspection for broken or missing cam latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts; torqueing the cross bolts in the latch pins; measuring the extension of the latch pins; replacing all alloy steel cross bolts through the latch pins with CRES cross bolts; doing a general visual inspection of all cam latches for lip deformation; doing a HFEC or magnetic particle inspection of cam latch 1 and cam latch 2 for cracks and replacing all cracked or broken parts; checking the rig of the MCD and re-rigging as applicable; and doing related investigative and corrective actions. This service information also describes procedures for doing repetitive inspections for certain conditions specified in the service information, which terminate after the MCD rigging is done as specified in this service information. This service information also describes procedures for doing MCD post-rigging inspections and corrective actions. These service bulletins are distinct because they apply to different airplane models. We also reviewed Boeing 707/720 Service Bulletin 3477, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993; and Boeing Service Bulletin 727-52-0142, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. This service information describes procedures for doing general a general visual inspection of the hinge fittings and the cam latches on the MCD, and related investigative and corrective actions. These service bulletins are distinct because they apply to different airplane models. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 18 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: [[Page 87415]] Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost per Action Labor cost Parts cost product Cost on U.S. operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspection/torque/measurement 4 work-hours x $85 $0.............. $340........... $6,120. per hour = $340. Repetitive inspections pre- Up to 3 work-hours x $0.............. Up to $255 per Up to $4,590 per MCD rigging. $85 per hour = $255 inspection inspection cycle. per inspection cycle. cycle. MCD rigging/adjustment....... 48 work-hours x $85 Up to $8,821 \1\ Up to $12,901.. Up to $232,218. per hour = $4,080. Replacement of alloy cross 1 work-hour x $85 per $0.............. $85............ $1,530. bolts. hour = $85. Repetitive inspections post- 3 work-hours x $85 = $0.............. $255 per $4,590 per inspection MCD rigging. $255 per inspection inspection cycle. cycle. cycle. Concurrent \2\ inspection.... 8 work-hours x $85 $0.............. $680........... $12,240. per hour = $680. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Special tooling is available from the airplane manufacturer; $8,821 is the purchase price and $180 per day is the rental rate. \2\ The concurrent inspection is required by AD 91-22-04, Amendment 39-8064 (56 FR 55223, October 25, 1991). We estimate the following costs to do any necessary related investigative actions and certain replacements that will be required based on the results of the inspections. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these actions: On-Condition Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Related investigative actions...... Up to 3 work-hours x $85 $0 Up to $255. per hour = $255. Replacement of broken/missing parts 1 work-hour x $85 per hour $0 $85 per latch/pin. = $85 per latch/pin. Concurrent replacement \1\......... 26 work-hours x $85 = $15,324 $17,534. $2,210. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The concurrent replacement of parts is required by AD 91-22-04, Amendment 39-8064 (56 FR 55223, October 25, 1991). Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): 2016-19-16 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18665; Docket No. FAA- 2013-0215; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-132-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective January 9, 2017. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability The Boeing Company airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD. (1) Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes, as identified in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015. (2) Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by a report that a cam latch on the main cargo door (MCD) broke during flight. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct discrepancies of the cam latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts. Such discrepancies could reduce the structural integrity of the MCD, and result in potential loss of the cargo door and rapid decompression of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. [[Page 87416]] (g) MCD Pre-Rig Inspections, Bolt Torque, Latch Pin Measurement, Cross Bolt Replacement, and Related Investigative and Corrective Actions (1) Except as provided by paragraph (k)(l) of this AD, at the applicable times specified in table 1 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707- 300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727- 52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727- 100C, and 727-200F series airplanes): Do the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(iv) of this AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707- 300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes). (i) A general visual inspection of the MCD for broken or missing cam latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts. (ii) Torque the cross bolts in the latch pins. (iii) Measure the extension of the latch pins. (iv) Perform a general visual inspection of all cam latches for lip deformation. (2) Except as required by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, after accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(iv) of this AD: Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, replace all alloy steel cross bolts through the latch pins with corrosion resistant steel (CRES) cross bolts, repeat the applicable inspections, and do the check of the MCD rig and the latch mechanism adjustment test, at the applicable times and intervals specified in table 1 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' and in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes). Accomplishment of the check of the MCD rig terminates the repetitive inspections required by this paragraph. (h) MCD Post-Rigging Inspections and Corrective Actions (1) Except as required by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD: At the applicable times specified in table 2 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes): Do general visual inspections for any broken or missing cam latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts; a detailed inspection of the cam latches and latch pins for any cracks, or any gouges in critical areas; and an HFEC or magnetic particle inspection of cam latch 1 and cam latch 2 for cracks in critical areas; and do all applicable corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes). Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight. (2) Repeat the inspections required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD at the applicable times specified in table 2 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707- 300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727- 52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727- 100C, and 727-200F series airplanes). (i) Concurrent Actions (1) For airplanes identified in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015: Before or concurrently with accomplishment of the general visual inspections specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(iv) of this AD, do a general visual inspection of the hinge fittings and the cam latches on the MCD, and perform related investigative and corrective actions as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 707/720 Service Bulletin 3477, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. (2) For airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015: Before or concurrently with accomplishment of the general visual inspections specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(iv) of this AD, do a general visual inspection of the hinge fittings and the cam latches on the MCD, and perform related investigative and corrective actions as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 727-52-0142, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. (j) Parts Installation Prohibition As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an alloy steel bolt as a cross bolt through any latch pin fitting assembly in the lower sill of the MCD on any airplane. (k) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications The following exceptions apply to this AD. (1) Where Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes); specifies a compliance time relative to the issue date of that service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. (2) Where Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes); specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action: At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015 (for Model 727C, 727-100C, and 727-200F series airplanes); repair using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD. (l) Credit for Previous Actions This paragraph provides credit for the corresponding actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were done before the effective date of this AD using Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, dated February 6, 2012 (for Model 707-300, 707-300B, and 707-300C series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, dated January 30, 2012 (for Model 727C, 727- 100C, and 727-200F series airplanes). (m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (n) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact Patrick Farina, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-150L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562- 627-5344; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (o)(3) and (o)(4) of this AD. (o) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference [[Page 87417]] (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (i) Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, 2015. (ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2015. (iii) Boeing 707/720 Service Bulletin 3477, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. (iv) Boeing Service Bulletin 727-52-0142, Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544- 5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 14, 2016. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2016-28337 Filed 12-2-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![87412 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
electronic data submission requirement; ■ 4. In § 980.501, revise the first by the importer. Whenever pistachios
and (5) this rule provides a 60-day sentence of paragraph (a) introductory are offered for sampling and testing, the
comment period, and any comments text and paragraph (a)(4), and add importer shall furnish any labor and pay
received will be considered prior to paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: any costs incurred for storing, moving,
finalization of this rule. and opening containers as may be
§ 980.501 Safeguard procedures for necessary for proper sampling and
List of Subjects potatoes, onions, and tomatoes exempt
from grade, size, quality and maturity
testing. The importer shall furnish the
7 CFR Part 944 requirements. USDA inspector with the customs entry
Avocados, Food grades and standards, (a) Each person who imports or number and such other identifying
Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit, receives any of the commodities listed information for each lot as he or she
Olives, Oranges. in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this may request. Importers may make
section shall file (electronically or arrangements for required sampling by
7 CFR Part 980 contacting the Inspection Service office
paper) an ‘‘Importer’s Exempt
Food grades and standards, Imports, Commodity Form’’ (FV–6) with the closest to where the pistachios will be
Marketing agreements, Onions, Potatoes, Marketing Order and Agreement made available for sampling. For
Tomatoes. Division, Specialty Crops Program, questions regarding sampling, a list of
AMS, USDA. * * * Federal or Federal-State Inspection
7 CFR Part 999
(4) Pearl onions; or Program offices, or for further
Dates, Filberts, Food grades and assistance, importers may contact:
(5) Tomatoes to be used in
standards, Imports, Nuts, Pistachios, Specialty Crops Inspection Division,
noncommercial outlets for experimental
Prunes, Raisins, Reporting and Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
purposes.
recordkeeping requirements, Walnuts. 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room
For the reasons set forth in the * * * * *
1536–S, Washington, DC 20250;
preamble, 7 CFR parts 944, 980, and 999 PART 999—SPECIALTY CROPS; Telephone: (202) 720–5870; Fax: (202)
are amended as follows: IMPORT REGULATIONS 720–0393.
■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR * * * * *
parts 944, 980, and 999 continues to ■ 5. Amend § 999.1 as follows:
Dated: November 29, 2016.
read as follows: ■ a. Revise paragraph (c)(1);
■ b. Remove paragraph (e); and Elanor Starmer,
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (f) through Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
(i) as (e) through (h), respectively. Service.
PART 944—FRUITS; IMPORT
REGULATIONS [FR Doc. 2016–29022 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
§ 999.1 Regulations governing the
BILLING CODE P
importation of dates.
■ 2. Revise § 944.401 paragraph (e) to
read as follows: * * * * *
(c) Inspection and certification
§ 944.401 Olive Regulation 1. requirements—(1) Inspection. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
* * * * * Inspection shall be performed by USDA Federal Aviation Administration
(e) Inspection shall be performed by inspectors in accordance with the
USDA inspectors in accordance with Regulations Governing the Inspection 14 CFR Part 39
said regulations governing the and Certification of Processed Fruits
inspection and certification of processed and Vegetables and Related Products [Docket No. FAA–2013–0215; Directorate
fruits and vegetables and related (part 52 of this title). The cost of each Identifier 2012–NM–132–AD; Amendment
products (part 52 of this title). The cost such inspection and related certification 39–18665; AD 2016–19–16]
of each such inspection and related shall be borne by the applicant. RIN 2120–AA64
certification shall be borne by the Applicants shall provide USDA
applicant therefore. Applicants shall inspectors with the entry number and Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
provide USDA inspectors with the entry such other identifying information for Company Airplanes
number and such other identifying each lot as the inspector may request.
information for each lot as the inspector AGENCY: Federal Aviation
* * * * *
may request. Administration (FAA), DOT.
■ 6. Amend § 999.600 as follows:
* * * * * ■ a. Remove paragraph (d)(1); and
ACTION: Final rule.
■ 3. Amend § 980.212 as follows: ■ b. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(2) and
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
■ a. Revise paragraph (b) introductory (3) as (d)(1) and (2), respectively, and airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
text; and revise the newly designated paragraph
■ b. Remove and reserve paragraphs
The Boeing Company Model 707–300,
(d)(1). 707–300B, and 707–300C series
(b)(2) and (3).
§ 999.600 Regulation governing the airplanes; and certain Model 727C, 727–
§ 980.212 Import regulations; tomatoes. importation of pistachios. 100C, and 727–200F series airplanes.
* * * * * * * * * * This AD was prompted by a report
(b) Grade, size, quality and maturity (d) Sampling. (1) All sampling for indicating that a cam latch on the main
requirements. On and after the effective aflatoxin testing shall be performed by cargo door (MCD) broke during flight.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
date hereof no person may import fresh USDA-authorized inspectors in This AD requires various inspections
tomatoes except pear shaped, cherry, accordance with USDA rules and and related investigative and corrective
hydroponic and greenhouse tomatoes as regulations governing the inspection actions, if necessary. We are issuing this
defined herein, unless they are and certification of fresh fruits, AD to address the unsafe condition on
inspected and meet the following vegetables, and other products (7 CFR these products.
requirements: part 51). The cost of each such sampling DATES: This AD is effective January 9,
* * * * * and related certification shall be borne 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:57 Dec 02, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM 05DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_87645/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 87415
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
Inspection/torque/measurement ........... 4 work-hours × $85 per hour = $340 .. $0 .......................... $340 ...................... $6,120.
Repetitive inspections pre-MCD rigging Up to 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $0 .......................... Up to $255 per in- Up to $4,590 per
$255 per inspection cycle. spection cycle. inspection cycle.
MCD rigging/adjustment ....................... 48 work-hours × $85 per hour = Up to $8,821 1 ...... Up to $12,901 ....... Up to $232,218.
$4,080.
Replacement of alloy cross bolts ......... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ...... $0 .......................... $85 ........................ $1,530.
Repetitive inspections post-MCD rig- 3 work-hours × $85 = $255 per in- $0 .......................... $255 per inspec- $4,590 per inspec-
ging. spection cycle. tion cycle. tion cycle.
Concurrent 2 inspection ........................ 8 work-hours × $85 per hour = $680 .. $0 .......................... $680 ...................... $12,240.
1 Specialtooling is available from the airplane manufacturer; $8,821 is the purchase price and $180 per day is the rental rate.
2 The concurrent inspection is required by AD 91–22–04, Amendment 39–8064 (56 FR 55223, October 25, 1991).
We estimate the following costs to do will be required based on the results of determining the number of aircraft that
any necessary related investigative the inspections. We have no way of might need these actions:
actions and certain replacements that
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
Related investigative actions ..................................... Up to 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ............. $0 Up to $255.
Replacement of broken/missing parts ....................... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per latch/pin ..... $0 $85 per latch/pin.
Concurrent replacement 1 .......................................... 26 work-hours × $85 = $2,210 ................................ $15,324 $17,534.
1 The concurrent replacement of parts is required by AD 91–22–04, Amendment 39–8064 (56 FR 55223, October 25, 1991).
Authority for This Rulemaking (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory FAA–2013–0215; Directorate Identifier
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 2012–NM–132–AD.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under (a) Effective Date
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures This AD is effective January 9, 2017.
section 106, describes the authority of (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation (b) Affected ADs
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more in Alaska, and None.
detail the scope of the Agency’s (4) Will not have a significant (c) Applicability
authority. economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities The Boeing Company airplanes,
We are issuing this rulemaking under certificated in any category, as identified in
the authority described in Subtitle VII, under the criteria of the Regulatory
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: Flexibility Act.
(1) Model 707–300, 707–300B, and 707–
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 300C series airplanes, as identified in Boeing
section, Congress charges the FAA with 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3536, Revision 1,
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation dated September 16, 2015.
air commerce by prescribing regulations safety, Incorporation by reference, (2) Model 727C, 727–100C, and 727–200F
for practices, methods, and procedures Safety. series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert
the Administrator finds necessary for Service Bulletin 727–52A0150, Revision 1,
Adoption of the Amendment
safety in air commerce. This regulation dated November 5, 2015.
is within the scope of that authority Accordingly, under the authority
(d) Subject
because it addresses an unsafe condition delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as Air Transport Association (ATA) of
that is likely to exist or develop on America Code 52, Doors.
products identified in this rulemaking follows:
action. (e) Unsafe Condition
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
This AD was prompted by a report that a
Regulatory Findings DIRECTIVES
cam latch on the main cargo door (MCD)
This AD will not have federalism ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
broke during flight. We are issuing this AD
implications under Executive Order to detect and correct discrepancies of the cam
continues to read as follows: latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts.
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Such discrepancies could reduce the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
the relationship between the national structural integrity of the MCD, and result in
§ 39.13 [Amended] potential loss of the cargo door and rapid
government and the States, or on the
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding decompression of the airplane.
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various the following new airworthiness (f) Compliance
levels of government. directive (AD): Comply with this AD within the
For the reasons discussed above, I 2016–19–16 The Boeing Company: compliance times specified, unless already
certify that this AD: Amendment 39–18665; Docket No. done.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:57 Dec 02, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM 05DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_87645/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 87417
(IBR) of the service information listed in this fuel tank panels, and repair if necessary. Directive 2015–0216, dated October 28,
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR We are issuing this AD to address the 2015 (referred to after this as the
part 51. unsafe condition on these products. Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
(2) You must use this service information
DATES: This AD is effective January 9, Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 2017. an unsafe condition for certain Dassault
(i) Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin The Director of the Federal Register Aviation Model FALCON 7X airplanes.
A3536, Revision 1, dated September 16, approved the incorporation by reference The MCAI states:
2015. of a certain publication listed in this AD Several rear fuselage tanks of the Falcon 7X
(ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727– as of January 9, 2017. were assembled on the production line with
52A0150, Revision 1, dated November 5, a lateral panel, which had been excessively
ADDRESSES: For service information
2015. chemically-milled in some areas.
(iii) Boeing 707/720 Service Bulletin 3477, identified in this final rule, contact
Investigation results determined that the
Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation,
remaining thickness is insufficient to meet
(iv) Boeing Service Bulletin 727–52–0142, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South the certification requirements. Dassault
Revision 2, dated April 15, 1993. Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone 201– Aviation identified the individual aeroplanes
(3) For service information identified in 440–6700; Internet http:// that are potentially affected by this
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may production deficiency. Due to this reduced
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services view this referenced service information thickness, the risk of damaging and
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, at the FAA, Transport Airplane puncturing a fuel tank wall panel as a result
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– of a high energy lightning strike is increased.
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the This condition, if not detected and
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. corrected, could lead to loss of electrical
(4) You may view this service information availability of this material at the FAA, power and/or other essential functions,
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, call 425–227–1221. It is also available possibly resulting in reduced control of the
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For on the Internet at http:// aeroplane or ignition of a fuel tank.
information on the availability of this www.regulations.gov by searching for To address this potential unsafe condition,
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– Dassault Aviation published Service Bulletin
(5) You may view this service information 5466. (SB) 7X–245 to provide inspection and repair
that is incorporated by reference at the instructions.
National Archives and Records Examining the AD Docket For the reasons described above, this
Administration (NARA). For information on [EASA] AD requires a one-time inspection of
You may examine the AD docket on
the availability of this material at NARA, call the fuel tank wall panels and, depending on
202–741–6030, or go to: http:// the Internet at http://
findings, accomplishment of a repair.
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- www.regulations.gov by searching for
locations.html. and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– You may examine the MCAI in the
5466; or in person at the Docket AD docket on the Internet at http://
Issued in Renton, Washington, on www.regulations.gov by searching for
September 14, 2016. Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
Michael Kaszycki, 5466.
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
contains this AD, the regulatory Comments
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
evaluation, any comments received, and
[FR Doc. 2016–28337 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
other information. The street address for We gave the public the opportunity to
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P the Docket Office (telephone 800–647– participate in developing this AD. We
5527) is Docket Management Facility, received no comments on the NPRM or
U.S. Department of Transportation, on the determination of the cost to the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION public.
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Federal Aviation Administration Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Conclusion
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
We reviewed the relevant data and
14 CFR Part 39 Washington, DC 20590.
determined that air safety and the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom public interest require adopting this AD
[Docket No. FAA–2016–5466; Directorate Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
Identifier 2015–NM–183–AD; Amendment as proposed except for minor editorial
39–18724; AD 2016–24–07]
International Branch, ANM–116, changes. We have determined that these
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, minor changes:
RIN 2120–AA64 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA • Are consistent with the intent that
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137; was proposed in the NPRM for
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault fax 425–227–1149.
Aviation Airplanes correcting the unsafe condition; and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: • Do not add any additional burden
AGENCY: Federal Aviation upon the public than was already
Discussion
Administration (FAA), Department of proposed in the NPRM.
Transportation (DOT). We issued a notice of proposed We also determined that these
ACTION: Final rule. rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR changes will not increase the economic
part 39 by adding an AD that would burden on any operator or increase the
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new apply to certain Dassault Aviation scope of this AD.
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model FALCON 7X airplanes. The
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X NPRM published in the Federal Related Service Information Under 1
airplanes. This AD was prompted by Register on April 13, 2016 (81 FR CFR Part 51
investigation results that determined 21770) (‘‘the NPRM’’). We reviewed Dassault Service
that a certain thickness of the fuel tank The European Aviation Safety Agency Bulletin 7X–245, dated June 8, 2015.
panels is insufficient to meet the (EASA), which is the Technical Agent The service information describes
certification requirements. This AD for the Member States of the European procedures for measuring fuel tank
requires inspecting the thickness of the Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness panel thickness, and repair if necessary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:57 Dec 02, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM 05DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_87645/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-03 00:25:49
Document Modified: 2016-12-03 00:25:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This AD is effective January 9, 2017. | |
| Contact | Patrick Farina, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-150L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5344; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 87412 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR