81 FR 89024 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 237 (December 9, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 237 (December 9, 2016)
| Page Range | 89024-89026 | |
| FR Document | 2016-29594 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 89024-89026] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-29594] [[Page 89024]] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0318; FRL-9956-25-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM) from large confined animal facilities (LCAFs). We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Any comments must arrive by January 9, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2016-0318 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972- 3848, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of these rules? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules or rule revisions? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules D. Public Comment and Proposed Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this proposal with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ICAPCD............................ 217 Large Confined Animal 02/09/2016 04/21/2016 Facilities (LCAF) Permits Required. ICAPCD............................ 101 Definitions................. 02/09/2016 04/21/2016 ICAPCD............................ 202 Exemptions.................. 02/09/2016 04/21/2016 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 18, 2016, the EPA determined that the submittal for ICAPCD Rules 217, 101 and 202 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of these rules? There are no previous versions of Rule 217 in the SIP, although the ICAPCD adopted an earlier version of Rule 217 on October 10, 2006, and CARB submitted it to us on August 24, 2007. CARB withdrew this version of Rule 217 on May 17, 2011. We approved earlier versions of Rules 101 and 202 into the SIP on October 2, 2014 (79 FR 59433) and May 9, 2011 (76 FR 26615), respectively. While we can act on only the most recently submitted version, we have reviewed materials provided with previous submittals. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules or rule revisions? VOCs contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, smog and PM, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. PM, including PM equal to or less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5 ) and PM equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10 ), contributes to effects that are harmful to human health and the environment, including premature mortality, aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, decreased lung function, visibility impairment, and damage to vegetation and ecosystems. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that control PM emissions. These rules also help to control ammonia, which contributes to PM formation. Rule 217 is designed to limit VOC and ammonia emissions from LCAFs, including dairies, beef feedlots, poultry houses, swine facilities and other confined animal facilities. The rule applies to operations at or above certain size thresholds specified in the rule.\1\ These operations must obtain an ICAPCD permit, submit an emissions mitigation plan and implement mitigation measures. Rule 217 lists mitigation measure requirements for each type of LCAF. The measures are grouped into categories.\2\ The LCAF owner/operator must implement the [[Page 89025]] requirements within each category.\3\ Rules 101--Definitions, and 202-- Exemptions, were revised to be consistent with the LCAF thresholds for dairy cows, chicken and ducks established in Rule 217. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Table 1 of Rule 217 provides large confined animal facility (LCAF) thresholds for each type of livestock for which the rule applies. For example, the beef feedlot LCAF threshold is 3,500 beef cattle, the dairy LCAF threshold is 500 milking cows, and the poultry LCAF threshold is 400,000 chickens or ducks. \2\ For example, the mitigation measure requirements for beef feedlots are grouped into the following categories: A. Feed, B. Silage, C. Housing, D. Solid Manure/Separated Solids, E. Liquid Manure and F. Land Application. \3\ For example, Rule 217 Table 2.1 (C. Housing) states ``An owner/operator of a beef feedlot CAF shall implement mitigation measures 1, 2, 3, and 4 and at least one (1) additional mitigation measure in each of the animal housing structures (e.g., each corral, etc.):'' and lists the mitigation measures below, numbered 1-7. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about these rules. II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document, and for each non-CTG major source of VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2)). The ICAPCD regulates sources in an ozone nonattainment area classified as moderate for the 1997 and the 2008 8- hour ozone standards (40 CFR 81.305). Therefore, we are evaluating whether this rule implements RACT-level controls for this area source category. Rules 101 and 202 support the requirements in Rule 217 but do not contain emission limitations directly, so we are not evaluating them for rule stringency. Generally, SIP rules must also implement Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM), including RACT, in moderate PM2.5 nonattainment areas (see CAA sections 172(c)(1) and 189(a)(1)(C)). The ICAPCD regulates sources in a PM2.5 nonattainment area classified as moderate for the 2006 24-hour and the 2012 annual standards. (40 CFR 81.305). RACM evaluations are generally performed in context of a broader implementation plan. Therefore, we are not proposing to determine whether this rule fulfills RACM requirements at this time, although we did evaluate Rule 217 with respect to RACT-level controls in the TSD. Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 4. ``State Implementation Plans for Serious PM-10 Nonattainment Areas, and Attainment Date Waivers for PM-10 Nonattainment Areas Generally; Addendum to the General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994). B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? We believe these rules are consistent with CAA requirements and relevant guidance regarding enforceability, RACT and SIP revisions. The TSD has more information on our evaluation. C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agency modifies the rules. D. Public Comment and Proposed Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to fully approve the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until January 9, 2017. Unless we receive convincing new information during the comment period, we intend to publish a final approval action that will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include, in a final EPA rule, regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the ICAPCD rules described in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land [[Page 89026]] or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: November 21, 2016. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2016-29594 Filed 12-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![89024 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, making effective comments, please visit
AGENCY identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
OAR–2016–0318 at http:// commenting-epa-dockets.
40 CFR Part 52 www.regulations.gov, or via email to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0318; FRL–9956–25– submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 3848, levin.nancy@epa.gov.
Region 9] online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Approval of California Air Plan cannot be removed or edited from Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
Revisions, Imperial County Air Regulations.gov. For either manner of and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Pollution Control District submission, the EPA may publish any Table of Contents
comment received to its public docket.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Do not submit electronically any I. The State’s Submittal
Agency (EPA). information you consider to be A. What rules did the State submit?
ACTION: Proposed rule.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
Confidential Business Information (CBI) C. What is the purpose of the submitted
or other information whose disclosure is rules or rule revisions?
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection restricted by statute. Multimedia II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
revisions to the Imperial County Air accompanied by a written comment. B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) The written comment is considered the criteria?
portion of the California State official comment and should include C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Implementation Plan (SIP). These discussion of all points you wish to Improve the Rules
revisions concern emissions of volatile make. The EPA will generally not D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
organic compounds (VOCs) and III. Incorporation by Reference
consider comments or comment
particulate matter (PM) from large IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
contents located outside of the primary
confined animal facilities (LCAFs). We submission (i.e. on the web, cloud or I. The State’s Submittal
are proposing to approve local rules to other file sharing system). For
regulate these emission sources under A. What rules did the State submit?
additional submission methods, please
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We contact the person identified in the FOR Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
are taking comments on this proposal FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. this proposal with the dates that they
and plan to follow with a final action. For the full EPA public comment policy, were adopted by the local air agency
DATES: Any comments must arrive by information about CBI or multimedia and submitted by the California Air
January 9, 2017. submissions and general guidance on Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
ICAPCD ............ 217 Large Confined Animal Facilities (LCAF) Permits Required ........................ 02/09/2016 04/21/2016
ICAPCD ............ 101 Definitions ..................................................................................................... 02/09/2016 04/21/2016
ICAPCD ............ 202 Exemptions ................................................................................................... 02/09/2016 04/21/2016
On May 18, 2016, the EPA determined C. What is the purpose of the submitted including dairies, beef feedlots, poultry
that the submittal for ICAPCD Rules rules or rule revisions? houses, swine facilities and other
217, 101 and 202 met the completeness confined animal facilities. The rule
VOCs contribute to the production of
criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, applies to operations at or above certain
ground-level ozone, smog and PM,
which must be met before formal EPA size thresholds specified in the rule.1
which harm human health and the
review. These operations must obtain an
environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA
requires states to submit regulations that ICAPCD permit, submit an emissions
B. Are there other versions of these
control VOC emissions. PM, including mitigation plan and implement
rules?
PM equal to or less than 2.5 microns in mitigation measures. Rule 217 lists
There are no previous versions of diameter (PM2.5) and PM equal to or less mitigation measure requirements for
Rule 217 in the SIP, although the than 10 microns in diameter (PM10), each type of LCAF. The measures are
ICAPCD adopted an earlier version of contributes to effects that are harmful to grouped into categories.2 The LCAF
Rule 217 on October 10, 2006, and human health and the environment, owner/operator must implement the
CARB submitted it to us on August 24, including premature mortality,
2007. CARB withdrew this version of aggravation of respiratory and 1 Table 1 of Rule 217 provides large confined
Rule 217 on May 17, 2011. We approved cardiovascular disease, decreased lung animal facility (LCAF) thresholds for each type of
earlier versions of Rules 101 and 202 function, visibility impairment, and livestock for which the rule applies. For example,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
into the SIP on October 2, 2014 (79 FR damage to vegetation and ecosystems. the beef feedlot LCAF threshold is 3,500 beef cattle,
59433) and May 9, 2011 (76 FR 26615), Section 110(a) of the CAA requires the dairy LCAF threshold is 500 milking cows, and
respectively. While we can act on only states to submit regulations that control the poultry LCAF threshold is 400,000 chickens or
PM emissions. These rules also help to ducks.
the most recently submitted version, we 2 For example, the mitigation measure
have reviewed materials provided with control ammonia, which contributes to
requirements for beef feedlots are grouped into the
previous submittals. PM formation.
following categories: A. Feed, B. Silage, C. Housing,
Rule 217 is designed to limit VOC and D. Solid Manure/Separated Solids, E. Liquid
ammonia emissions from LCAFs, Manure and F. Land Application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Dec 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM 09DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_89261/page/1.svg)
![89026 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
or in any other area where the EPA or compliance date for the monitoring that is placed in the public docket and
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a requirements for low-energy absorbers. made available on the Internet. If you
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of DATES: Comments. Comments must be submit an electronic comment, the EPA
Indian country, the rule does not have received on or before January 23, 2017. recommends that you include your
tribal implications and will not impose Public Hearing. If anyone contacts the name and other contact information in
substantial direct costs on tribal EPA requesting to speak at a public the body of your comment and with any
governments or preempt tribal law as hearing by December 14, 2016, we will disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 hold a public hearing on December 27, cannot read your comment due to
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 2016 on the EPA campus at 109 T.W. technical difficulties and cannot contact
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle you for clarification, the EPA may not
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Park, North Carolina. be able to consider your comment.
Environmental protection, Air ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your Electronic files should not include
pollution control, Incorporation by comments, identified by Docket ID No. special characters or any form of
reference, Intergovernmental relations, EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0522, at http:// encryption and be free of any defects or
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting www.regulations.gov. Follow the online viruses. For additional information
and recordkeeping requirements, instructions for submitting comments. about the EPA’s public docket, visit the
Volatile organic compounds. Once submitted, comments cannot be EPA Docket Center homepage at http://
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. edited or removed from Regulations.gov. www.epa.gov/dockets.
Dated: November 21, 2016. The EPA may publish any comment Docket. The EPA has established a
received to its public docket. Do not docket for this rulemaking under Docket
Alexis Strauss,
submit electronically any information ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0522. All
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. documents in the docket are listed in
you consider to be Confidential
[FR Doc. 2016–29594 Filed 12–8–16; 8:45 am] the Regulations.gov index. Although
Business Information (CBI) or other
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
information whose disclosure is listed in the index, some information is
restricted by statute. Multimedia not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be information whose disclosure is
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION restricted by statute. Certain other
accompanied by a written comment.
AGENCY material, such as copyrighted material,
The written comment is considered the
40 CFR Part 63 official comment and should include is not placed on the Internet and will be
discussion of all points you wish to publicly available only in hard copy.
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0522; FRL–9956–00– make. The EPA will generally not Publicly available docket materials are
OAR] consider comments or comment available either electronically in
contents located outside of the primary Regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
RIN 2060–AT14 submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or EPA Docket Center, Room 3334, EPA
other file sharing system). For WJC West Building, 1301 Constitution
Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing and Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The
Phosphate Fertilizer Production Risk additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy, Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
and Technology Review a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
information about CBI or multimedia
AGENCY: Environmental Protection submissions, and general guidance on Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
Agency (EPA). making effective comments, please visit telephone number for the Public
ACTION: Reconsideration; proposed rule. http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
commenting-epa-dockets. the telephone number for the EPA
SUMMARY: This action proposes Instructions. Direct your comments to Docket Center is (202) 566–1742.
amendments to the National Emission Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012– Public Hearing. A public hearing will
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 0522. The EPA’s policy is that all be held, if requested by December 14,
(NESHAP) for the Phosphoric Acid comments received will be included in 2016, to accept oral comments on this
Manufacturing and Phosphate Fertilizer the public docket without change and proposed action. If a hearing is
Production source categories. The may be made available online at http:// requested, it will be held at the EPA’s
proposed amendments are in response www.regulations.gov, including any North Carolina campus located at 109
to two petitions for reconsideration filed personal information provided, unless T.W. Alexander Drive, Research
by industry stakeholders on the rule the comment includes information Triangle Park, NC 27711. The hearing, if
revisions to NESHAP for the Phosphoric claimed to be CBI or other information requested, will begin at 10:00 a.m. (local
Acid Manufacturing and Phosphate whose disclosure is restricted by statute. time) and will continue until the earlier
Fertilizer Production source categories Do not submit information that you of 5:00 p.m. or 1 hour after the last
that were promulgated on August 19, consider to be CBI or otherwise registered speaker has spoken. To
2015 (80 FR 50386) (hereafter the protected through http:// request a hearing, to register to speak at
‘‘August 2015 Final Rule’’). We are www.regulations.gov or email. The a hearing, or to inquire if a hearing will
proposing to revise the compliance date http://www.regulations.gov Web site is be held, please contact Ms. Pamela
by which affected sources must include an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which Garrett at (919) 541–7966 or by email at
emissions from oxidation reactors when means the EPA will not know your garrett.pamela@epa.gov. The last day to
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
determining compliance with the total identity or contact information unless pre-register to speak at a hearing, if one
fluoride (TF) emission limits for you provide it in the body of your is held, will be December 22, 2016.
superphosphoric acid (SPA) process comment. If you send an email Additionally, requests to speak will be
lines. We are also proposing to add a comment directly to the EPA without taken the day of the hearing at the
new option, and clarify an existing going through http:// hearing registration desk, although
option, to the monitoring requirements www.regulations.gov, your email preferences on speaking times may not
for low-energy absorbers. In addition, address will be automatically captured be able to be fulfilled. Please note that
we are proposing to revise the and included as part of the comment registration requests received before the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Dec 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM 09DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_89261/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 09:03:52
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 09:03:52
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Any comments must arrive by January 9, 2017. | |
| Contact | Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972- 3848, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 89024 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR