81 FR 89045 - Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 237 (December 9, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 237 (December 9, 2016)
| Page Range | 89045-89047 | |
| FR Document | 2016-29542 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 89045-89047] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-29542] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People's Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. The Department has preliminarily determined that certain companies covered by this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective December 9, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482- 3683, respectively. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades and parts thereof. The diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under 6804.21.00. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See the Memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Five companies that received a separate rate in previous segments of the proceeding and are subject to this review reported that they did not have any exports of subject merchandise during the POR.\2\ U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for the POR indicated that these companies had no shipments.\3\ Additionally, we requested that CBP report any contrary information.\4\ To date, CBP has not responded to our inquiry with any contrary information and we have not received any evidence that these companies had any shipments of the subject merchandise sold to the United States during the POR. Further, consistent with our practice, we find that it is not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to these companies but, rather, to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of review.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See the February 11, 2016, no-shipment letters from Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited, the February 12, 2016, no-shipment letter from Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and the April 1, 2016, letter correcting the separate rate certification and certifying no shipment from Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. \3\ See the CBP data attached to the letter to all interested parties dated January 15, 2016. \4\ See CBP message numbers 6294301, 6294302, 6294305, 6294306, and 6294307 dated October 20, 2016, available at http://adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/. \5\ See, e.g., Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of Administrative Review and Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2013, 80 FR 34619 (June 17, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates The Department preliminarily determines that 24 respondents are eligible to receive separate rates in this review.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4-8, for more details. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates for Eligible Non-Selected Respondents Consistent with our practice, we assigned to eligible non-selected respondents the weighted-average margin calculated for Bosun Tools Co., Ltd. as the separate rate for the preliminary results of this review.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 89046]] PRC-Wide Entity The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.\8\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change (i.e., 82.05 percent).\9\ Aside from the no-shipments and separate rate companies discussed above, and the company for which the review is being rescinded, the Department considers all other companies for which a review was requested (which did not file a separate rate application) to be part of the PRC-wide entity.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). \9\ See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015). \10\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 736, 737 (January 7, 2016) (``All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below.''). Companies that are subject to this administrative review that are considered to be part of the PRC-wide entity are ASHINE Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd., Henan Huanghe Whirlwind Co., Ltd., Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International Co., Ltd., and Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., constructed export price was calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, normal value was calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity,\11\ we assigned a margin based on adverse facts available pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ We preliminarily treat Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd., as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2, n. 4 for details. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Exporter Margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bosun Tools Co., Ltd................................. 6.20 Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd............... 6.20 Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd........... 6.20 Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd 6.20 Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............ 6.20 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............ 6.20 Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd......... 6.20 Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd............. 6.20 Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd... 6.20 Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd........... 6.20 Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd................. 6.20 Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity........................ 82.05 Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation................ 6.20 Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd............. 6.20 Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd............. 6.20 Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd.............. 6.20 Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd............................. 6.20 Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd........... 6.20 Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd.......... 6.20 Sino Tools Co., Ltd.................................. 6.20 Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd..... 6.20 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. \12\..... 6.20 Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd................ 6.20 Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd.................. 6.20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., is the successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to disclose calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\13\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\14\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the cases briefs are filed.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for [[Page 89047]] Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\16\ Hearing requests should contain (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. Unless extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised by parties in their comments, within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of review, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\17\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Specifically, the Department will apply the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Final Modification for Reviews.\18\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \18\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). \19\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by exporters individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\20\ The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: December 5, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments V. Discussion of the Methodology A. Non-Market Economy Country Status B. Separate Rates C. Surrogate Country VI. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences A. Use of Facts Available B. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference C. Selection of the AFA Rate VII. Fair Value Comparisons A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis C. U.S. Price D. Normal Value E. Factor Valuations VIII. Currency Conversion IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-29542 Filed 12-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Notices 89045
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE
[11/22/2016 through 12/5/2016]
Date
Firm name Firm address accepted for Product(s)
investigation
Byers’ Choice, Ltd ............................ 4355 County Line Road, Chalfont, 11/30/2016 The firm manufactures ornamental figurines, known
PA 18914. as ‘‘The Carolers.’’
Pyott-Boone Electronics, Inc ............ 1459 Wittens Mill Road, North 11/30/2016 The firm manufactures amplifiers, passive units and
Tazewell, VA 24630. gas monitors.
Valtech Corporation ......................... 2113 Sanatoga Station Road, 12/1/2016 The firm manufactures thermoset plastic materials
Pottstown, PA 19464. with unique properties that are used in the produc-
tion of semiconductor or solar wafers.
Supreme Manufacturing Company 1755 East Birchwood Avenue, Des 12/5/2016 The firm manufactures rollers, brackets, housing and
d/b/a C&L Supreme. Plaines, IL 60018. other miscellaneous metal components for data
processing machines.
Any party having a substantial sales of subject merchandise at less than Border Protection (CBP) data for the
interest in these proceedings may normal value. Interested parties are POR indicated that these companies had
request a public hearing on the matter. invited to comment on these no shipments.3 Additionally, we
A written request for a hearing must be preliminary results. requested that CBP report any contrary
submitted to the Trade Adjustment DATES: Effective December 9, 2016. information.4 To date, CBP has not
Assistance for Firms Division, Room FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: responded to our inquiry with any
71030, Economic Development Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/ contrary information and we have not
Administration, U.S. Department of CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement received any evidence that these
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no and Compliance, International Trade companies had any shipments of the
later than ten (10) calendar days Administration, U.S. Department of subject merchandise sold to the United
following publication of this notice. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue States during the POR. Further,
Please follow the requirements set NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: consistent with our practice, we find
forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR (202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–3683,
315.9 for procedures to request a public that it is not appropriate to rescind the
respectively. review with respect to these companies
hearing. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance official number Scope of the Order but, rather, to complete the review and
and title for the program under which The merchandise subject to the order issue appropriate instructions to CBP
these petitions are submitted is 11.313, is diamond sawblades and parts thereof. based on the final results of review.5
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. The diamond sawblades subject to the Separate Rates
order are currently classifiable under
Miriam Kearse,
subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the The Department preliminarily
Lead Program Analyst. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the determines that 24 respondents are
[FR Doc. 2016–29480 Filed 12–8–16; 8:45 am] United States (HTSUS), and may also eligible to receive separate rates in this
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P enter under 6804.21.00. While the review.6
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the Separate Rates for Eligible Non-
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE written description is dispositive. A full Selected Respondents
description of the scope of the order is
International Trade Administration Consistent with our practice, we
contained in the Preliminary Decision
[A–570–900] Memorandum.1 assigned to eligible non-selected
respondents the weighted-average
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof Preliminary Determination of No margin calculated for Bosun Tools Co.,
From the People’s Republic of China: Shipments Ltd. as the separate rate for the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Five companies that received a preliminary results of this review.7
Duty Administrative Review; 2014– separate rate in previous segments of the
2015 proceeding and are subject to this Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and the
review reported that they did not have April 1, 2016, letter correcting the separate rate
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, certification and certifying no shipment from
any exports of subject merchandise
International Trade Administration, Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
during the POR.2 U.S. Customs and
Department of Commerce. 3 See the CBP data attached to the letter to all
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce interested parties dated January 15, 2016.
1 See the Memorandum from Deputy Assistant
4 See CBP message numbers 6294301, 6294302,
(the Department) is conducting an Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary 6294305, 6294306, and 6294307 dated October 20,
administrative review of the Paul Piquado entitled, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and
2016, available at http://adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/
antidumping duty order on diamond Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
adcvdweb/.
Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
5 See, e.g., Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
sawblades) from the People’s Republic 2015,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final
of China (the PRC). The period of review by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Rescission, In Part, of Administrative Review and
2 See the February 11, 2016, no-shipment letters Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2013, 80 FR
(POR) is November 1, 2014, through 34619 (June 17, 2015).
from Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd.,
October 31, 2015. The Department has Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., and 6 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4–8,
preliminarily determined that certain Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited, the for more details.
companies covered by this review made February 12, 2016, no-shipment letter from Qingdao 7 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Dec 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_89282/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Notices 89047
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. PRC-wide rate.20 The Department II. Background
Department of Commerce, filed intends to issue appropriate assessment III. Scope of the Order
electronically using ACCESS. An instructions directly to CBP 15 days IV. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
electronically filed document must be after publication of the final results of V. Discussion of the Methodology
received successfully in its entirety by review. A. Non-Market Economy Country Status
the Department’s ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. B. Separate Rates
Cash Deposit Requirements
Eastern Time within 30 days after the C. Surrogate Country
date of publication of this notice.16 The following cash deposit VI. Application of Facts Available and
Hearing requests should contain (1) the requirements will be effective upon Adverse Inferences
party’s name, address, and telephone publication of the final results of this A. Use of Facts Available
number; (2) the number of participants; administrative review for shipments of B. Application of Facts Available With an
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. the subject merchandise from the PRC Adverse Inference
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, C. Selection of the AFA Rate
Issues raised in the hearing will be VII. Fair Value Comparisons
limited to those raised in the respective for consumption on or after the
A. Determination of Comparison Method
case briefs. Unless extended, the publication date, as provided by section B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Department intends to issue the final 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject Analysis
results of this review, including the merchandise exported by the companies C. U.S. Price
results of its analysis of issues raised by listed above that have separate rates, the D. Normal Value
parties in their comments, within 120 cash deposit rate will be that established E. Factor Valuations
days after the publication of these in the final results of review (except, if VIII. Currency Conversion
the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero IX. Recommendation
preliminary results, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR cash deposit will be required); (2) for [FR Doc. 2016–29542 Filed 12–8–16; 8:45 am]
351.213(h)(1). previously investigated or reviewed PRC BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
and non-PRC exporters not listed above
Assessment Rates that received a separate rate in a prior
Upon issuing the final results of segment of this proceeding, the cash DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
review, the Department will determine, deposit rate will continue to be the
and CBP shall assess, antidumping existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all International Trade Administration
duties on all appropriate entries covered PRC exporters of subject merchandise [A–201–805]
by this review.17 If a respondent’s that have not been found to be entitled
weighted-average dumping margin is to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy
above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) in will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and Steel Pipe From Mexico; Preliminary
the final results of this review, we will (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject Results, Preliminary Determination of
calculate an importer-specific merchandise which have not received No Shipments, and Partial Rescission
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio their own rate, the cash deposit rate will of Antidumping Duty Administrative
of the total amount of dumping be the rate applicable to the PRC Review; 2014–2015
calculated for the importer’s examined exporter that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
sales and the total entered value of those
when imposed, shall remain in effect International Trade Administration,
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
until further notice. Department of Commerce.
351.212(b)(1). Specifically, the
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Department will apply the assessment Notification to Importers
rate calculation method adopted in (the Department) is conducting an
Final Modification for Reviews.18 Where This notice serves as a preliminary administrative review of the
an importer- (or customer-) specific ad reminder to importers of their antidumping duty order on certain
valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we responsibility under 19 CFR circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
will instruct CBP to liquidate 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate from Mexico. The period of review
appropriate entries without regard to regarding the reimbursement of (POR) is November 1, 2014, through
antidumping duties.19 antidumping duties prior to liquidation October 31, 2015. This review covers
For entries that were not reported in of the relevant entries during this POR. eight producers/exporters of the subject
the U.S. sales databases submitted by Failure to comply with this requirement merchandise, including two
exporters individually examined during could result in the Department’s respondents selected for individual
this review, the Department will presumption that reimbursement of examination: Maquilacero, S.A. de C.V.
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at antidumping duties occurred and the (Maquilacero) and Regiomontana de
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the subsequent assessment of doubled Perfiles y Tubos, S.A. de C.V.
Department determines that an exporter antidumping duties. (Regiopytsa). We preliminarily
We are issuing and publishing these determine that Maquilacero and
under review had no shipments of the
results in accordance with sections Regiopytsa made sales of subject
subject merchandise, any suspended
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 merchandise at less than normal value
entries that entered under that
CFR 351.213. during the POR. Additionally, we
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the Dated: December 5, 2016. preliminarily determine that Lamina y
Paul Piquado, Placa Comercial, S.A. de C.V. (Lamina y
Placa) and Mueller Comercial de
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
16 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
17 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Compliance. Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mueller) had
18 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of no shipments during the POR.
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool)
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty the Preliminary Decision Memorandum timely withdrew its request for review
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for I. Summary of Burner Systems International (BSI);
Reviews). consequently, we rescind the
19 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 20 Id. administrative review with regard to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Dec 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_89282/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 09:03:54
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 09:03:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective December 9, 2016. | |
| Contact | Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482- 3683, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 89045 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR