81_FR_89292 81 FR 89055 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015

81 FR 89055 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 237 (December 9, 2016)

Page Range89055-89056
FR Document2016-29568

On August 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 53441 (August 12, 2016) (Preliminary Results). This review covers Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya) and Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation (SMTC). We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Result and received no comments or requests for a hearing. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that sales of subject merchandise by Nan Ya were not made at prices less than normal value during the period of review (POR). We continue to find that SMTC had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 237 (Friday, December 9, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 89055-89056]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29568]



[[Page 89055]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-837]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From 
Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On August 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate 
film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 
See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from 
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 53441 
(August 12, 2016) (Preliminary Results). This review covers Nan Ya 
Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya) and Shinkong Materials Technology 
Corporation (SMTC). We invited interested parties to comment on the 
Preliminary Result and received no comments or requests for a hearing. 
Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that sales of 
subject merchandise by Nan Ya were not made at prices less than normal 
value during the period of review (POR). We continue to find that SMTC 
had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.

DATES: Effective December 9, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On August 12, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results.\1\ The POR is July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. We invited 
interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received 
no comments or requests for a hearing from any party. The Department 
conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping duty order are all gauges 
of raw, pretreated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or coextruded. 
Excluded are metalized films and other finished films that have had at 
least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a 
performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 
inches thick. Imports of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and 
strip are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The 
written description of the scope of the antidumping duty order is 
dispositive.

Final Results of Review

    As noted above, the Department received no comments concerning the 
Preliminary Results on the record of this segment of the proceeding. As 
there are no changes from, or comments upon, the Preliminary Results, 
the Department finds that there is no reason to modify its analysis and 
calculations. Thus, we continue to find that sales of subject 
merchandise by Nan Ya were not made at less than normal value during 
the POR. Further, we continue to find that SMTC had no shipments of 
subject merchandise during the POR. For further details of the issues 
addressed in this proceeding, see the Preliminary Results and the 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ The final weighted-
average dumping margin for the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 
2015, for Nan Ya is zero percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination 
of No Shipments: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 
from Taiwan; 2013-2014,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 
dated August 5, 2016 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which can be 
accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
information and information provided by SMTC and its affiliate Shinkong 
Synthetic Fibers Corporation (SSFC), we determine that SMTC had no 
shipments of subject merchandise, and, therefore, no reviewable 
transactions, during the POR.\3\ For a full discussion of this 
determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS).\4\ ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit in room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, 
a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be 
accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In the Preliminary Results for the 2008-2009 antidumping 
duty administrative review, we determined that for the purposes of 
calculating an antidumping margin, SMTC, and its parent company 
Shinkong Synthetic Fibers Corporation (SSFC) should be treated as a 
single entity. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 
from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 49902 (August 16, 2010), (unchanged in the Final 
Results for the 2008-2009 antidumping duty administrative review 
(Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from Taiwan: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 9745 
(February 22, 2011))).
    \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries in this review, in accordance with 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 
days after publication of these final results of review. Because we 
calculated a zero margin in the final results of this review for Nan 
Ya, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212 we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 
rate for Nan Ya will be zero percent, the rate established in the final 
results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not covered in this review, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not

[[Page 89056]]

a firm covered in this or any previous review or in the original less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash-
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period 
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous 
review or the investigation, the cash-deposit rate will continue to be 
the all-others rate of 2.40 percent which is the all-others rate 
established by the Department in the LTFV investigation.\5\ These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final Determination, 67 FR 
at 44175, unchanged in Correction Notice, 67 FR at 46566.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation, which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: December 5, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-29568 Filed 12-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Notices                                                89055

                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                    administrative review in accordance                   POR.3 For a full discussion of this
                                                                                                            with section 751(a)(2) of the Act.                    determination, see the Preliminary
                                                  International Trade Administration                                                                              Decision Memorandum, which is a
                                                                                                            Scope of the Order
                                                                                                                                                                  public document and is on file
                                                  [A–583–837]                                                  The products covered by the                        electronically via Enforcement and
                                                                                                            antidumping duty order are all gauges of              Compliance’s Antidumping and
                                                  Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,                          raw, pretreated, or primed PET film,                  Countervailing Duty Centralized
                                                  Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From                          whether extruded or coextruded.                       Electronic Service System (ACCESS).4
                                                  Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping                      Excluded are metalized films and other                ACCESS is available to registered users
                                                  Duty Administrative Review and Final                      finished films that have had at least one             at http://access.trade.gov and is
                                                  Determination of No Shipments; 2014–                      of their surfaces modified by the                     available to all parties in the Central
                                                  2015                                                      application of a performance-enhancing                Records Unit in room B8024 of the main
                                                                                                            resinous or inorganic layer of more than              Commerce building. In addition, a
                                                  AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                                                                            0.00001 inches thick. Imports of                      complete version of the Preliminary
                                                  International Trade Administration,
                                                                                                            polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,               Decision Memorandum can be accessed
                                                  Department of Commerce.
                                                                                                            and strip are currently classifiable in the           directly on the Internet at http://
                                                  SUMMARY: On August 12, 2016, the                                                                                enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
                                                                                                            Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
                                                  Department of Commerce (the                                                                                     The signed and electronic versions of
                                                                                                            United States (HTSUS) under item
                                                  Department) published the preliminary                                                                           the Decision Memorandum are identical
                                                                                                            number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS
                                                  results of the administrative review of                                                                         in content.
                                                                                                            subheadings are provided for
                                                  the antidumping duty (AD) order on
                                                                                                            convenience and customs purposes. The                 Assessment Rates
                                                  polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
                                                                                                            written description of the scope of the
                                                  and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan in                                                                                The Department will determine, and
                                                                                                            antidumping duty order is dispositive.
                                                  accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of                                                                         CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
                                                  the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the                   Final Results of Review                               all appropriate entries in this review, in
                                                  Act). See Polyethylene Terephthalate                                                                            accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of
                                                  Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from                       As noted above, the Department                     the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). The
                                                  Taiwan: Preliminary Results of                            received no comments concerning the                   Department intends to issue assessment
                                                  Antidumping Duty Administrative                           Preliminary Results on the record of this             instructions directly to CBP 15 days
                                                  Review and Preliminary Determination                      segment of the proceeding. As there are               after publication of these final results of
                                                  of No Shipments; 2014–2015, 81 FR                         no changes from, or comments upon,                    review. Because we calculated a zero
                                                  53441 (August 12, 2016) (Preliminary                      the Preliminary Results, the Department               margin in the final results of this review
                                                  Results). This review covers Nan Ya                       finds that there is no reason to modify               for Nan Ya, in accordance with 19 CFR
                                                  Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya) and                         its analysis and calculations. Thus, we               351.212 we will instruct CBP to
                                                  Shinkong Materials Technology                             continue to find that sales of subject                liquidate the appropriate entries
                                                  Corporation (SMTC). We invited                            merchandise by Nan Ya were not made                   without regard to antidumping duties.
                                                  interested parties to comment on the                      at less than normal value during the
                                                                                                            POR. Further, we continue to find that                Cash Deposit Requirements
                                                  Preliminary Result and received no
                                                  comments or requests for a hearing.                       SMTC had no shipments of subject                        The following cash deposit
                                                  Therefore, for the final results, we                      merchandise during the POR. For                       requirements will be effective upon
                                                  continue to find that sales of subject                    further details of the issues addressed in            publication of the final results of this
                                                  merchandise by Nan Ya were not made                       this proceeding, see the Preliminary                  administrative review for all shipments
                                                  at prices less than normal value during                   Results and the accompanying                          of the subject merchandise entered, or
                                                  the period of review (POR). We continue                   Preliminary Decision Memorandum.2                     withdrawn from warehouse, for
                                                  to find that SMTC had no shipments of                     The final weighted-average dumping                    consumption on or after the publication
                                                  subject merchandise during the POR.                       margin for the period July 1, 2014,                   date, as provided for by section
                                                                                                            through June 30, 2015, for Nan Ya is                  751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
                                                  DATES: Effective December 9, 2016.
                                                                                                            zero percent.                                         deposit rate for Nan Ya will be zero
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                                                                percent, the rate established in the final
                                                  Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD                             Final Determination of No Shipments
                                                                                                                                                                  results of this review; (2) for previously
                                                  Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and                     Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs               reviewed or investigated companies not
                                                  Compliance, International Trade                           and Border Protection (CBP)                           covered in this review, the cash deposit
                                                  Administration, U.S. Department of                        information and information provided                  rate will continue to be the company-
                                                  Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue                        by SMTC and its affiliate Shinkong                    specific rate published for the most
                                                  NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:                     Synthetic Fibers Corporation (SSFC), we               recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
                                                  (202) 482–5255.                                           determine that SMTC had no shipments
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                of subject merchandise, and, therefore,                 3 In the Preliminary Results for the 2008–2009

                                                                                                                                                                  antidumping duty administrative review, we
                                                  Background                                                no reviewable transactions, during the                determined that for the purposes of calculating an
                                                                                                                                                                  antidumping margin, SMTC, and its parent
                                                    On August 12, 2016, the Department                        2 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary         company Shinkong Synthetic Fibers Corporation
                                                  published the Preliminary Results.1 The                   Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative            (SSFC) should be treated as a single entity. See
                                                  POR is July 1, 2014, through June 30,                     Review and Preliminary Determination of No            Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            Shipments: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet,    from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
                                                  2015. We invited interested parties to                                                                          Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 49902 (August
                                                                                                            and Strip from Taiwan; 2013–2014,’’ from Christian
                                                  comment on the Preliminary Results.                       Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping     16, 2010), (unchanged in the Final Results for the
                                                  We received no comments or requests                       and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul           2008–2009 antidumping duty administrative review
                                                  for a hearing from any party. The                         Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and      (Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip
                                                                                                            Compliance, dated August 5, 2016 (Preliminary         from Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
                                                  Department conducted this                                                                                       Administrative Review, 76 FR 9745 (February 22,
                                                                                                            Decision Memorandum), which can be accessed
                                                                                                            directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/         2011))).
                                                    1 See   Preliminary Results.                            index.html.                                             4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3.




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014     18:13 Dec 08, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00014   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM   09DEN1


                                                  89056                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Notices

                                                  a firm covered in this or any previous                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  rebuttal briefs. The issues are identified
                                                  review or in the original less-than-fair-                                                                       in the Appendix to this notice. The
                                                  value (LTFV) investigation but the                      International Trade Administration                      Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
                                                  manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate                  [C–533–825]
                                                                                                                                                                  public document and is on file
                                                  will be the rate established for the most                                                                       electronically via Enforcement and
                                                  recent period for the manufacturer of                   Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,                        Compliance’s Antidumping and
                                                  the merchandise; and (4) if neither the                 Sheet, and Strip From India: Final                      Countervailing Duty Centralized
                                                  exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm                 Results of Countervailing Duty                          Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
                                                  covered in this or any previous review                  Administrative Review; 2014                             ACCESS is available to registered users
                                                  or the investigation, the cash-deposit                                                                          at http://access.trade.gov and in the
                                                                                                          AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                   Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
                                                  rate will continue to be the all-others                 International Trade Administration,
                                                  rate of 2.40 percent which is the all-                                                                          the main Department of Commerce
                                                                                                          Department of Commerce.                                 building. In addition, a complete
                                                  others rate established by the
                                                                                                          SUMMARY: On August 3, 2016, the                         version of the Issues and Decision
                                                  Department in the LTFV investigation.5
                                                                                                          Department published the preliminary                    Memorandum can be accessed directly
                                                  These cash deposit requirements, when                   results of the administrative review of                 on the Internet at http://trade.gov/
                                                  imposed, shall remain in effect until                   the countervailing duty order on                        enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed
                                                  further notice.                                         polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,                 Issues and Decision Memorandum and
                                                  Reimbursement of Duties                                 and strip (PET film) from India. This                   electronic versions of the Issues and
                                                                                                          review covers two companies: Jindal                     Decision Memorandum are identical in
                                                    This notice also serves as a final                    Poly Films Limited (Jindal), and SRF                    content.
                                                  reminder to importers of their                          Limited. The period of review (POR) is
                                                                                                                                                                  Changes Since the Preliminary Results
                                                  responsibility under 19 CFR                             January 1, 2014, through December 31,
                                                  351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate                     2014. Based on an analysis of the                         The Department published the
                                                  regarding the reimbursement of                          comments received, the Department has                   preliminary results of this
                                                  antidumping duties prior to liquidation                 made changes to the subsidy rate                        administrative review of PET film from
                                                  of the relevant entries during this                     determined for Jindal. The final subsidy                India on August 3, 2016.3 Based on the
                                                  review period. Failure to comply with                   rates are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of              comments received from Petitioners, in
                                                  this requirement could result in the                    Administrative Review’’ section below.                  these final results, we corrected a
                                                  Secretary’s presumption that                            DATES: Effective December 9, 2016.                      ministerial error made in the context of
                                                  reimbursement of antidumping duties                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi                   our analysis of the Export Promotion
                                                  occurred and the subsequent assessment                  Blum, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,                    Capital Goods Scheme (EPCGS).4
                                                  of double antidumping duties.                           Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.                        Methodology
                                                                                                          Department of Commerce, 1401
                                                  Administrative Protective Order                         Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,                       The Department conducted this
                                                    This notice also serves as a reminder                 DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0197.                    review in accordance with section
                                                  to parties subject to administrative                                                                            751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                                                                          Scope of the Order
                                                  protective order (APO) of their                                                                                 amended (the Act). For each of the
                                                                                                             For the purposes of the order, the                   subsidy programs found
                                                  responsibility concerning the return or
                                                                                                          products covered are all gauges of raw,                 countervailable, we find that there is a
                                                  destruction of proprietary information                  pretreated, or primed polyethylene                      subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
                                                  disclosed under APO in accordance                       terephthalate film, sheet and strip,                    financial contribution that gives rise to
                                                  with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which                        whether extruded or coextruded.                         a benefit to the recipient, and that the
                                                  continues to govern business                            Excluded are metallized films and other                 subsidy is specific.5 For a description of
                                                  proprietary information in this segment                 finished films that have had at least one               the methodology underlying all of the
                                                  of the proceeding. Timely written                       of their surfaces modified by the                       Department’s conclusions, see the Issues
                                                  notification of the return/destruction of               application of a performance-enhancing                  and Decision Memorandum.
                                                  APO materials or conversion to judicial                 resinous or inorganic layer of more than
                                                  protective order is hereby requested.                   0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET                    Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
                                                  Failure to comply with the regulations                  film are classifiable in the Harmonized                 the Final Results of Countervailing Duty
                                                  and terms of an APO is a violation,                     Tariff Schedule of the United States                    Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate
                                                                                                                                                                  Film, Sheet, and Strip from India; 2013,’’ dated
                                                  which is subject to sanction.                           (HTSUS) under item number                               concurrently with this notice and herein
                                                    We are issuing and publishing this                    3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are                    incorporated by reference (Issues and Decision
                                                  notice in accordance with sections                      provided for convenience and customs                    Memorandum).

                                                  751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19               purposes. The written description of the                   3 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and

                                                                                                          scope of the order is dispositive.                      Strip From India: Preliminary Results And Partial
                                                  CFR 351.213(h).                                                                                                 Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative
                                                                                                          Analysis of Comments Received                           Review; 2014, 81 FR 51186 (August 3, 2016)
                                                    Dated: December 5, 2016.                                                                                      (Preliminary Results 2014).
                                                  Paul Piquado,                                              The issues raised by Petitioners 1 and                  4 For a discussion of these issues, see the Issues


                                                  Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and                 Jindal in their case briefs are addressed               and Decision Memorandum, and Memorandum to
                                                                                                          in the Issues and Decision                              the File from Elfi Blum, International Trade
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Compliance.                                                                                                     Compliance Analyst, titled ‘‘Final Results of 2014
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–29568 Filed 12–8–16; 8:45 am]             Memorandum.2 Neither party submitted                    Countervailing Duty Administrative Review:
                                                                                                                                                                  Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
                                                  BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                    1 DuPont Teijin Films, Inc., Mitsubishi Polyester     from India—Jindal Polyfilms Limited,’’ each dated
                                                                                                          Film, Inc. and SKC, Inc. (collectively, Petitioners).   concurrently with these final results.
                                                                                                            2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy            5 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
                                                    5 See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final
                                                                                                          Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and                 regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
                                                  Determination, 67 FR at 44175, unchanged in             Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,        of the Act regarding benefit; and, section 771(5A)
                                                  Correction Notice, 67 FR at 46566.                      Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and                 of the Act regarding specificity.



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:13 Dec 08, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00015   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM    09DEN1



Document Created: 2018-02-14 09:04:08
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 09:04:08
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective December 9, 2016.
ContactJacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5255.
FR Citation81 FR 89055 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR