81_FR_90535 81 FR 90295 - World Trade Center Health Program; Petition 012-Atherosclerosis; Finding of Insufficient Evidence

81 FR 90295 - World Trade Center Health Program; Petition 012-Atherosclerosis; Finding of Insufficient Evidence

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 240 (December 14, 2016)

Page Range90295-90297
FR Document2016-29816

On April 11, 2016, the Administrator of the World Trade Center (WTC) Health Program received two petitions (combined into Petition 012) to add atherosclerosis to the List of WTC-Related Health Conditions (List). The Program conducted a literature search for the term in response to the Petition and found no relevant studies regarding atherosclerosis among 9/11-exposed populations. Accordingly, the Administrator finds that insufficient evidence exists to request a recommendation of the WTC Health Program Scientific/Technical Advisory Committee (STAC), to publish a proposed rule, or to publish a determination not to publish a proposed rule.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 90295-90297]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29816]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

42 CFR Part 88

[NIOSH Docket 094]


World Trade Center Health Program; Petition 012--Atherosclerosis; 
Finding of Insufficient Evidence

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS.

ACTION: Denial of petition for addition of a health condition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 11, 2016, the Administrator of the World Trade Center 
(WTC) Health Program received two petitions (combined into Petition 
012) to add atherosclerosis to the List of WTC-Related Health 
Conditions (List). The Program conducted a literature search for the 
term in response to the Petition and found no relevant studies 
regarding atherosclerosis among 9/11-exposed populations. Accordingly, 
the Administrator finds that insufficient evidence exists to request a 
recommendation of the WTC Health Program Scientific/Technical Advisory 
Committee (STAC), to publish a proposed rule, or to publish a

[[Page 90296]]

determination not to publish a proposed rule.

DATES: The Administrator of the WTC Health Program is denying this 
petition for the addition of a health condition as of December 14, 
2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Weiss, Program Analyst, 1090 
Tusculum Avenue, MS: C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226; telephone (855) 818-
1629 (this is a toll-free number); email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

A. WTC Health Program Statutory Authority
B. Petition 012
C. Review of Scientific and Medical Information and Administrator 
Determination
D. Administrator's Final Decision on Whether To Propose the Addition 
of Atherosclerosis to the List
E. Approval To Submit Document to the Office of the Federal Register

A. WTC Health Program Statutory Authority

    Title I of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 
2010 (Pub. L. 111-347, as amended by Pub. L. 114-113), added Title 
XXXIII to the Public Health Service (PHS) Act,\1\ establishing the WTC 
Health Program within the Department of Health and Human Services 
(HHS). The WTC Health Program provides medical monitoring and treatment 
benefits to eligible firefighters and related personnel, law 
enforcement officers, and rescue, recovery, and cleanup workers who 
responded to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York 
City, at the Pentagon, and in Shanksville, Pennsylvania (responders), 
and to eligible persons who were present in the dust or dust cloud on 
September 11, 2001, or who worked, resided, or attended school, 
childcare, or adult daycare in the New York City disaster area 
(survivors).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Title XXXIII of the PHS Act is codified at 42 U.S.C. 300mm 
to 300mm-61. Those portions of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and 
Compensation Act of 2010 found in Titles II and III of Public Law 
111-347 do not pertain to the WTC Health Program and are codified 
elsewhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All references to the Administrator of the WTC Health Program 
(Administrator) in this notice mean the Director of the National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) or his or her 
designee.
    Pursuant to section 3312(a)(6)(B) of the PHS Act, interested 
parties may petition the Administrator to add a health condition to the 
List in 42 CFR 88.1. Within 90 days after receipt of a petition to add 
a condition to the List, the Administrator must take one of the 
following four actions described in section 3312(a)(6)(B) and 42 CFR 
88.17: (1) Request a recommendation of the STAC; (2) publish a proposed 
rule in the Federal Register to add such health condition; (3) publish 
in the Federal Register the Administrator's determination not to 
publish such a proposed rule and the basis for such determination; or 
(4) publish in the Federal Register a determination that insufficient 
evidence exists to take action under (1) through (3) above. However, in 
accordance with 42 CFR 88.17(a)(4), the Administrator is required to 
consider a new petition for a previously-evaluated health condition 
determined not to qualify for addition to the List only if the new 
petition presents a new medical basis--evidence not previously reviewed 
by the Administrator--for the association between 9/11 exposures and 
the condition to be added.
    In addition to the regulatory provisions, the WTC Health Program 
has developed policies to guide the review of submissions and petitions 
\2\ and the analysis of evidence supporting the potential addition of a 
non-cancer health condition to the List.\3\ In accordance with the 
aforementioned non-cancer health condition addition policy, the 
Administrator directs the WTC Health Program to conduct a review of the 
scientific literature to determine if the available scientific 
information has the potential to provide a basis for a decision on 
whether to add the health condition to the List. A literature review 
includes a search for peer-reviewed, published epidemiologic studies 
(including direct observational studies in the case of health 
conditions such as injuries) about the health condition among 9/11-
exposed populations; such studies are considered ``relevant.'' Relevant 
studies identified in the literature search are further reviewed for 
their quantity and quality to provide a basis for deciding whether to 
propose adding the health condition to the List. Where the available 
evidence has the potential to provide a basis for a decision, the 
scientific and medical evidence is further assessed to determine 
whether a causal relationship between 9/11 exposures and the health 
condition is supported. A health condition may be added to the List if 
peer-reviewed, published, direct observational or epidemiologic studies 
provide substantial support \4\ for a causal relationship between 9/11 
exposures and the health condition in 9/11-exposed populations. If the 
evidence assessment provides only modest support \5\ for a causal 
relationship between 9/11 exposures and the health condition, the 
Administrator may then evaluate additional peer-reviewed, published 
epidemiologic studies, conducted among non-9/11-exposed populations, 
evaluating associations between the health condition of interest and 9/
11 agents.\6\ If that additional assessment establishes substantial 
support for a causal relationship between a 9/11 agent or agents and 
the health condition, the health condition may be added to the List.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See WTC Health Program [2014], Policy and Procedures for 
Handling Submissions and Petitions to Add a Health Condition to the 
List of WTC-Related Health Conditions, May 14, http://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHPPPPetitionHandlingProcedures14May2014.pdf.
    \3\ See WTC Health Program [2016], Policy and Procedures for 
Adding Non-Cancer Conditions to the List of WTC-Related Health 
Conditions, May 11, http://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHP_PP_Adding_NonCancer_Conditions_Revision_11_May_2016.pdf.
    \4\ The substantial evidence standard is met when the Program 
assesses all of the available, relevant information and determines 
with high confidence that the evidence supports its findings 
regarding a causal association between the 9/11 exposure(s) and the 
health condition.
    \5\ The modest evidence standard is met when the Program 
assesses all of the available, relevant information and determines 
with moderate confidence that the evidence supports its findings 
regarding a causal association between the 9/11 exposure(s) and the 
health condition.
    \6\ 9/11 agents are chemical, physical, biological, or other 
agents or hazards reported in a published, peer-reviewed exposure 
assessment study of responders or survivors who were present in the 
New York City disaster area, at the Pentagon site, or at the 
Shanksville, Pennsylvania site, as those locations are defined in 42 
CFR 88.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Petition 012

    On April 11, 2016, the Administrator received a petition from a New 
York City Police Department (NYPD) responder who worked at Ground Zero, 
and a second, related petition which requested the addition of 
``atherosclerosis (plaque in arteries),'' and ``atherosclerosis--
arterial plaque,'' respectively, to the List; the petitions provided 
references to the same medical basis, a study by Mani et al. [2013]. 
The petitions together are considered Petition 012 as permitted by 42 
CFR 88.17(a)(3).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Petition 012, WTC Health Program: Petitions Received, 
http://www.cdc.gov/wtc/received.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with WTC Health Program policy, the medical basis for 
a potential addition to the List may be demonstrated by reference to a 
peer-reviewed, published, epidemiologic study about the health 
condition among 9/11-exposed populations or to clinical case reports of 
health conditions in WTC responders or survivors.\8\ Both of

[[Page 90297]]

the submissions considered in the current petition, Petition 012, 
presented the same single reference to support the request to add 
``Atherosclerosis (plaque in arteries)'' to the List. The reference, a 
study by Mani et al. [2013],\9\ is a pilot study of the ability of 
diagnostic imaging to evaluate differences in atherosclerosis profiles 
in WTC responders exposed to high levels (as found in the initial dust 
cloud) and low levels (found after September 13, 2001) of particulate 
matter. The study evaluated the feasibility of using dynamic contrast 
enhanced MRI, a relatively new imaging method, to evaluate 
atherosclerosis among 31 law enforcement personnel who responded at 
Ground Zero (19 with self-reported high exposures and 12 with self-
reported low exposures). The study population examined in Mani et al. 
[2013] is small and is not fully representative of the greater 9/11 
population, including other non-law enforcement responders and 
survivors. Although the study has attributes of an epidemiologic study, 
the small subset of law enforcement personnel sampled and the non-
random manner in which the sample was obtained prevent extrapolation of 
the findings of Mani et al. [2013] to the whole 9/11-exposed 
population. Moreover, the study does not investigate the causal link 
between 9/11 exposures and atherosclerosis. Therefore, the 
Administrator has determined that while the inclusion of this peer-
reviewed and published study in the submissions provides sufficient 
medical basis to be considered a valid petition, Mani et al. [2013] is 
not an epidemiologic study, cannot be considered relevant, and is not 
further reviewed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See supra note 2.
    \9\ Mani V, Wong S, Sawit S, et al. [2013], Relationship between 
Particulate Matter Exposure and Atherogenic Profile in ``Ground 
Zero'' Workers as Shown by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Imaging, Int 
J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:827-833.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Review of Scientific and Medical Information and Administrator 
Determination

    In response to Petition 012, and pursuant to Program policy,\10\ 
the Program conducted a review of the scientific literature on 
atherosclerosis to determine if the available evidence has the 
potential to provide a basis for a decision on whether to add 
atherosclerosis to the List.\11\ The literature search identified one 
citation for atherosclerosis; \12\ upon review, however, it was found 
not to be relevant because it was not a study of atherosclerosis among 
the 9/11-exposed population.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Supra note 3.
    \11\ Databases searched include: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, 
PubMed, and Scopus.
    \12\ Landrigan PJ, Wright RO, Cordero JF, et al. [2015], The 
NIEHS Superfund Research Program: 25 Years of Translational Research 
for Public Health, Environ Health Perspect 123(10):909-918. This 
manuscript describes the successes of the Superfund Research 
Program; although the key terms ``atherosclerosis'' and ``World 
Trade Center'' are both mentioned, they are not discussed in 
relation to each other.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the literature review did not identify any relevant studies 
of atherosclerosis in the 9/11-exposed population, in accordance with 
the Program policy discussed above, the Program was unable to further 
evaluate Petition 012.

D. Administrator's Final Decision on Whether To Propose the Addition of 
Atherosclerosis to the List

    Finding no relevant studies with regard to Petition 012, the 
Administrator has accordingly determined that insufficient evidence is 
available to take further action at this time, including either 
proposing the addition of atherosclerosis to the List (pursuant to PHS 
Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(ii) and 42 CFR 88.17(a)(2)(ii)) or publishing a 
determination not to publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register 
(pursuant to PHS Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(iii) and 42 CFR 
88.17(a)(2)(iii)). The Administrator has also determined that 
requesting a recommendation from the STAC (pursuant to PHS Act, sec. 
3312(a)(6)(B)(i) and 42 CFR 88.17(a)(2)(i)) is unwarranted.
    For the reasons discussed above, the request made in Petition 012 
to add atherosclerosis to the List of WTC-Related Health Conditions is 
denied.
    Studies have not yet demonstrated whether 9/11 exposures, including 
inhalational dust/debris exposures or psychological exposures of the 
duration and magnitude experienced on and in the aftermath of September 
11, 2001, could cause the development of atherosclerosis in an 
individual WTC responder or survivor several years later. The 
Administrator looks forward to more definitive studies that directly 
evaluate the causal association between 9/11 exposures, especially 
inhalational dust exposures, and atherosclerosis.

E. Approval To Submit Document to the Office of the Federal Register

    The Secretary, HHS, or her designee, the Director, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Administrator, Agency for 
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), authorized the 
undersigned, the Administrator of the WTC Health Program, to sign and 
submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for 
publication as an official document of the WTC Health Program. Thomas 
R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H., Director, CDC, and Administrator, ATSDR, 
approved this document for publication on December 2, 2016.

    Dated: December 8, 2016.
John Howard,
Administrator, World Trade Center Health Program and Director, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-29816 Filed 12-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P



                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules                                                             90295

                                                       Category                                   NAICS 1 code                                                        Examples of potentially affected entities

                                                  Industry    ..............   447110, 447190 ......................................          Fuel Retailers.
                                                  Industry    ..............   454310 .....................................................   Other fuel dealers.
                                                  Industry    ..............   486910 .....................................................   Natural gas liquids pipelines, refined petroleum products pipelines.
                                                  Industry    ..............   493190 .....................................................   Other warehousing and storage—bulk petroleum storage.
                                                     1 2012   North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).


                                                     This table is not intended to be                                    B. Request for Comment                                     compliance tool calculations. The report
                                                  exhaustive, but rather provides a guide                                   To support the use of natural gasoline                  also suggests that other aspects of the
                                                  for readers regarding entities likely to be                            as an EFF blendstock while meeting the                     final blend may need to be taken into
                                                  regulated by this action. This table lists                             EPA’s evaporative emission control and                     account for the compliance tool to
                                                  the types of entities that the EPA is now                              public health protection goals, the EPA                    provide a satisfactory estimate of
                                                  aware could potentially be regulated by                                proposed that a fuel volatility                            ethanol blend volatility when natural
                                                  this action. Other types of entities not                               compliance tool could be used to                           gasoline is used as a blendstock. The
                                                  listed in the table could also be                                      demonstrate compliance with the                            EPA requests comment on all aspects of
                                                  regulated. To determine whether your                                   proposed volatility standards for EFF.                     this report and the proposed fuel
                                                  entity is regulated by this action, you                                The proposed compliance tool was                           volatility compliance tool as well as
                                                  should carefully examine the                                           based on a fuel volatility model that was                  how it might be modified to better
                                                  applicability criteria in the referenced                               developed using data on the volatility of                  estimate the effect of natural gasoline on
                                                  regulations. If you have any questions                                 gasoline—ethanol fuel blends.3 This                        the volatility of ethanol fuel blends. The
                                                  regarding the applicability of this action                             fuel volatility model, which is well                       EPA will consider the information
                                                  to a particular entity, consult the person                             accepted by industry, is used to estimate                  contained in the report made available
                                                  listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION                                  the volatility of ethanol blends made                      by this notice and the resulting public
                                                  CONTACT section.
                                                                                                                         with gasoline and/or blendstock for                        comments from this notice in
                                                                                                                         oxygenate blending.4 At proposal, we                       developing a final rule from the REGS
                                                  B. What is the Agency’s authority for
                                                                                                                         explained why we believed that the                         proposed rule.
                                                  taking this action?
                                                                                                                         proposed compliance tool would also be                       Dated: December 1, 2016.
                                                    This action is issued under the                                      a satisfactory means of estimating                         Christopher Grundler,
                                                  authority of CAA sections 208, 211 and                                 ethanol blend volatility when natural                      Director, Office of Transportation and Air
                                                  301.                                                                   gasoline is used as a blendstock even                      Quality.
                                                  II. Request for Comment                                                though we only had limited data that                       [FR Doc. 2016–29896 Filed 12–13–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                         evaluated its suitability for this purpose.                BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                  A. Background                                                          In sum, we reasoned that blendstock for
                                                    In the Renewables Enhancement and                                    oxygenate blending and natural gasoline
                                                  Growth Support (REGS) Rule,1 EPA is                                    blend linearly and would thus, behave                      DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                  proposing enhancements to its                                          as a single component in compliance                        HUMAN SERVICES
                                                  Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS)                                         tool calculations. The report that this
                                                  program and other related fuel                                         notice adds to the docket for the REGS                     42 CFR Part 88
                                                  regulations to support market growth of                                proposed rule, and for which we seek
                                                                                                                         public comment, contains the results of                    [NIOSH Docket 094]
                                                  ethanol and other renewable fuels in the
                                                  U.S. These proposed changes will                                       a test program that compares empirical                     World Trade Center Health Program;
                                                  provide the opportunity for increasing                                 data on E51–83 blend volatility when                       Petition 012—Atherosclerosis; Finding
                                                  the production and use of renewable                                    natural gasoline is used as a blendstock                   of Insufficient Evidence
                                                  fuels by allowing the market to operate                                to the volatility estimated by the
                                                  in the most efficient and economical                                   proposed compliance tool.5 These test                      AGENCY:  Centers for Disease Control and
                                                  way to introduce greater volumes of                                    data in this report indicate that the                      Prevention, HHS.
                                                  renewable fuels under the program. The                                 proposed compliance tool may                               ACTION: Denial of petition for addition of
                                                  proposed provisions for ethanol flex                                   significantly underestimate the                            a health condition.
                                                  fuel (EFF) 2 in the REGS rule would                                    volatility of some higher level ethanol
                                                  provide additional flexibility to use                                  blends when natural gasoline is used as                    SUMMARY:   On April 11, 2016, the
                                                  natural gasoline as an EFF blendstock                                  a blendstock. These data, therefore,                       Administrator of the World Trade
                                                  while maintaining the environmental                                    contradict the assumption that                             Center (WTC) Health Program received
                                                  performance of these fuels. The use of                                 blendstock for oxygenate blending and                      two petitions (combined into Petition
                                                  lower cost natural gasoline to make EFF                                natural gasoline blend linearly and                        012) to add atherosclerosis to the List of
                                                  may reduce the price to consumers of                                   behave as a single component in                            WTC-Related Health Conditions (List).
                                                  these fuels, thereby encouraging the use                                                                                          The Program conducted a literature
                                                  of additional ethanol and furthering the                                 3 SAE technical paper 2007–01–4006, ‘‘A Model            search for the term in response to the
                                                                                                                         for Estimating Vapor Pressures of Commingled               Petition and found no relevant studies
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                  goals for the RFS program.                                             Ethanol Fuels,’’ Sam R. Reddy. See the discussion
                                                                                                                         in Section IV.F.3. of the REGS proposed rule
                                                                                                                                                                                    regarding atherosclerosis among 9/11-
                                                    1 81 FR 80828, November 16, 2016.                                    beginning on page 81 FR 80867.                             exposed populations. Accordingly, the
                                                    2 Inthe REGS rule, EPA is proposing that all EFF                       4 A blendstock for oxygenate blending (BOB) is           Administrator finds that insufficient
                                                  blends that contain 16 to 83 volume percent ethanol                    formulated to manufacture compliant gasoline after         evidence exists to request a
                                                  (E16–E83) would be subject to the same set of                          the addition of ethanol.                                   recommendation of the WTC Health
                                                  regulatory controls rather than continuing to treat                      5 Property Analysis of Ethanol—Natural

                                                  E16–E50 blends as gasoline. E85 is a trade name                        Gasoline—BOB Blends to Make Flex Fuel, National
                                                                                                                                                                                    Program Scientific/Technical Advisory
                                                  that has historically been used for blends that                        Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) technical               Committee (STAC), to publish a
                                                  contain 51 to 83 volume percent ethanol (E51–E83).                     report 5400–67243, November 2016.                          proposed rule, or to publish a


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014        16:32 Dec 13, 2016        Jkt 241001      PO 00000      Frm 00041      Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1


                                                  90296              Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules

                                                  determination not to publish a proposed                 the Administrator must take one of the                causal relationship between 9/11
                                                  rule.                                                   following four actions described in                   exposures and the health condition is
                                                  DATES: The Administrator of the WTC                     section 3312(a)(6)(B) and 42 CFR 88.17:               supported. A health condition may be
                                                  Health Program is denying this petition                 (1) Request a recommendation of the                   added to the List if peer-reviewed,
                                                  for the addition of a health condition as               STAC; (2) publish a proposed rule in the              published, direct observational or
                                                  of December 14, 2016.                                   Federal Register to add such health                   epidemiologic studies provide
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        condition; (3) publish in the Federal                 substantial support 4 for a causal
                                                  Rachel Weiss, Program Analyst, 1090                     Register the Administrator’s                          relationship between 9/11 exposures
                                                  Tusculum Avenue, MS: C–46,                              determination not to publish such a                   and the health condition in 9/11-
                                                  Cincinnati, OH 45226; telephone (855)                   proposed rule and the basis for such                  exposed populations. If the evidence
                                                  818–1629 (this is a toll-free number);                  determination; or (4) publish in the                  assessment provides only modest
                                                  email NIOSHregs@cdc.gov.                                Federal Register a determination that                 support 5 for a causal relationship
                                                                                                          insufficient evidence exists to take                  between 9/11 exposures and the health
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                          action under (1) through (3) above.                   condition, the Administrator may then
                                                  Table of Contents                                       However, in accordance with 42 CFR                    evaluate additional peer-reviewed,
                                                                                                          88.17(a)(4), the Administrator is                     published epidemiologic studies,
                                                  A. WTC Health Program Statutory Authority
                                                  B. Petition 012
                                                                                                          required to consider a new petition for               conducted among non-9/11-exposed
                                                  C. Review of Scientific and Medical                     a previously-evaluated health condition               populations, evaluating associations
                                                      Information and Administrator                       determined not to qualify for addition to             between the health condition of interest
                                                      Determination                                       the List only if the new petition presents            and 9/11 agents.6 If that additional
                                                  D. Administrator’s Final Decision on                    a new medical basis—evidence not                      assessment establishes substantial
                                                      Whether To Propose the Addition of                  previously reviewed by the                            support for a causal relationship
                                                      Atherosclerosis to the List                         Administrator—for the association                     between a 9/11 agent or agents and the
                                                  E. Approval To Submit Document to the                   between 9/11 exposures and the                        health condition, the health condition
                                                      Office of the Federal Register                      condition to be added.                                may be added to the List.
                                                  A. WTC Health Program Statutory                            In addition to the regulatory
                                                                                                          provisions, the WTC Health Program                    B. Petition 012
                                                  Authority
                                                                                                          has developed policies to guide the                      On April 11, 2016, the Administrator
                                                     Title I of the James Zadroga 9/11                    review of submissions and petitions 2                 received a petition from a New York
                                                  Health and Compensation Act of 2010                     and the analysis of evidence supporting               City Police Department (NYPD)
                                                  (Pub. L. 111–347, as amended by Pub.                    the potential addition of a non-cancer                responder who worked at Ground Zero,
                                                  L. 114–113), added Title XXXIII to the                  health condition to the List.3 In                     and a second, related petition which
                                                  Public Health Service (PHS) Act,1                       accordance with the aforementioned                    requested the addition of
                                                  establishing the WTC Health Program                     non-cancer health condition addition                  ‘‘atherosclerosis (plaque in arteries),’’
                                                  within the Department of Health and                     policy, the Administrator directs the                 and ‘‘atherosclerosis—arterial plaque,’’
                                                  Human Services (HHS). The WTC                           WTC Health Program to conduct a                       respectively, to the List; the petitions
                                                  Health Program provides medical                         review of the scientific literature to                provided references to the same medical
                                                  monitoring and treatment benefits to                    determine if the available scientific                 basis, a study by Mani et al. [2013]. The
                                                  eligible firefighters and related                       information has the potential to provide              petitions together are considered
                                                  personnel, law enforcement officers,                    a basis for a decision on whether to add              Petition 012 as permitted by 42 CFR
                                                  and rescue, recovery, and cleanup                       the health condition to the List. A                   88.17(a)(3).7
                                                  workers who responded to the                            literature review includes a search for                  In accordance with WTC Health
                                                  September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in                peer-reviewed, published epidemiologic                Program policy, the medical basis for a
                                                  New York City, at the Pentagon, and in                  studies (including direct observational               potential addition to the List may be
                                                  Shanksville, Pennsylvania (responders),                 studies in the case of health conditions              demonstrated by reference to a peer-
                                                  and to eligible persons who were                        such as injuries) about the health                    reviewed, published, epidemiologic
                                                  present in the dust or dust cloud on                    condition among 9/11-exposed                          study about the health condition among
                                                  September 11, 2001, or who worked,                      populations; such studies are                         9/11-exposed populations or to clinical
                                                  resided, or attended school, childcare,                 considered ‘‘relevant.’’ Relevant studies             case reports of health conditions in
                                                  or adult daycare in the New York City                   identified in the literature search are               WTC responders or survivors.8 Both of
                                                  disaster area (survivors).                              further reviewed for their quantity and
                                                     All references to the Administrator of               quality to provide a basis for deciding                 4 The substantial evidence standard is met when

                                                  the WTC Health Program                                                                                        the Program assesses all of the available, relevant
                                                                                                          whether to propose adding the health                  information and determines with high confidence
                                                  (Administrator) in this notice mean the                 condition to the List. Where the                      that the evidence supports its findings regarding a
                                                  Director of the National Institute for                  available evidence has the potential to               causal association between the 9/11 exposure(s) and
                                                  Occupational Safety and Health                          provide a basis for a decision, the                   the health condition.
                                                                                                                                                                  5 The modest evidence standard is met when the
                                                  (NIOSH) or his or her designee.                         scientific and medical evidence is
                                                                                                                                                                Program assesses all of the available, relevant
                                                     Pursuant to section 3312(a)(6)(B) of                 further assessed to determine whether a               information and determines with moderate
                                                  the PHS Act, interested parties may                                                                           confidence that the evidence supports its findings
                                                  petition the Administrator to add a                       2 See WTC Health Program [2014], Policy and         regarding a causal association between the 9/11
                                                  health condition to the List in 42 CFR                  Procedures for Handling Submissions and Petitions     exposure(s) and the health condition.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                                                                          to Add a Health Condition to the List of WTC-           6 9/11 agents are chemical, physical, biological, or
                                                  88.1. Within 90 days after receipt of a                 Related Health Conditions, May 14, http://            other agents or hazards reported in a published,
                                                  petition to add a condition to the List,                www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHPPPPetitionHandling          peer-reviewed exposure assessment study of
                                                                                                          Procedures14May2014.pdf.                              responders or survivors who were present in the
                                                    1 Title XXXIII of the PHS Act is codified at 42         3 See WTC Health Program [2016], Policy and         New York City disaster area, at the Pentagon site,
                                                  U.S.C. 300mm to 300mm-61. Those portions of the         Procedures for Adding Non-Cancer Conditions to        or at the Shanksville, Pennsylvania site, as those
                                                  James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act          the List of WTC-Related Health Conditions, May 11,    locations are defined in 42 CFR 88.1.
                                                                                                                                                                  7 See Petition 012, WTC Health Program: Petitions
                                                  of 2010 found in Titles II and III of Public Law 111–   http://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHP_PP_Adding_
                                                  347 do not pertain to the WTC Health Program and        NonCancer_Conditions_Revision_11_May_                 Received, http://www.cdc.gov/wtc/received.html.
                                                  are codified elsewhere.                                 2016.pdf.                                               8 See supra note 2.




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:32 Dec 13, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00042   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1


                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules                                                 90297

                                                  the submissions considered in the                       however, it was found not to be relevant               document to the Office of the Federal
                                                  current petition, Petition 012, presented               because it was not a study of                          Register for publication as an official
                                                  the same single reference to support the                atherosclerosis among the 9/11-exposed                 document of the WTC Health Program.
                                                  request to add ‘‘Atherosclerosis (plaque                population.                                            Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H.,
                                                  in arteries)’’ to the List. The reference,                Since the literature review did not                  Director, CDC, and Administrator,
                                                  a study by Mani et al. [2013],9 is a pilot              identify any relevant studies of                       ATSDR, approved this document for
                                                  study of the ability of diagnostic                      atherosclerosis in the 9/11-exposed                    publication on December 2, 2016.
                                                  imaging to evaluate differences in                      population, in accordance with the                        Dated: December 8, 2016.
                                                  atherosclerosis profiles in WTC                         Program policy discussed above, the
                                                                                                                                                                 John Howard,
                                                  responders exposed to high levels (as                   Program was unable to further evaluate
                                                                                                                                                                 Administrator, World Trade Center Health
                                                  found in the initial dust cloud) and low                Petition 012.
                                                                                                                                                                 Program and Director, National Institute for
                                                  levels (found after September 13, 2001)                 D. Administrator’s Final Decision on                   Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for
                                                  of particulate matter. The study                        Whether To Propose the Addition of                     Disease Control and Prevention, Department
                                                  evaluated the feasibility of using                      Atherosclerosis to the List                            of Health and Human Services.
                                                  dynamic contrast enhanced MRI, a                                                                               [FR Doc. 2016–29816 Filed 12–13–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  relatively new imaging method, to                          Finding no relevant studies with
                                                                                                                                                                 BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
                                                  evaluate atherosclerosis among 31 law                   regard to Petition 012, the Administrator
                                                  enforcement personnel who responded                     has accordingly determined that
                                                  at Ground Zero (19 with self-reported                   insufficient evidence is available to take
                                                                                                          further action at this time, including                 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                  high exposures and 12 with self-
                                                  reported low exposures). The study                      either proposing the addition of
                                                                                                                                                                 Fish and Wildlife Service
                                                  population examined in Mani et al.                      atherosclerosis to the List (pursuant to
                                                  [2013] is small and is not fully                        PHS Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(ii) and 42
                                                                                                                                                                 50 CFR Part 17
                                                  representative of the greater 9/11                      CFR 88.17(a)(2)(ii)) or publishing a
                                                  population, including other non-law                     determination not to publish a proposed                [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0076;
                                                  enforcement responders and survivors.                   rule in the Federal Register (pursuant to              4500030115]
                                                  Although the study has attributes of an                 PHS Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(iii) and 42
                                                                                                                                                                 RIN 1018–BB33
                                                  epidemiologic study, the small subset of                CFR 88.17(a)(2)(iii)). The Administrator
                                                  law enforcement personnel sampled and                   has also determined that requesting a                  Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
                                                  the non-random manner in which the                      recommendation from the STAC                           and Plants; Listing Determinations for
                                                  sample was obtained prevent                             (pursuant to PHS Act, sec.                             Five Poecilotheria Tarantula Species
                                                  extrapolation of the findings of Mani et                3312(a)(6)(B)(i) and 42 CFR                            From Sri Lanka
                                                  al. [2013] to the whole 9/11-exposed                    88.17(a)(2)(i)) is unwarranted.
                                                  population. Moreover, the study does                       For the reasons discussed above, the                AGENCY:   Fish and Wildlife Service,
                                                  not investigate the causal link between                 request made in Petition 012 to add                    Interior.
                                                  9/11 exposures and atherosclerosis.                     atherosclerosis to the List of WTC-                    ACTION: Proposed rule.
                                                  Therefore, the Administrator has                        Related Health Conditions is denied.
                                                  determined that while the inclusion of                     Studies have not yet demonstrated                   SUMMARY:    We, the U.S. Fish and
                                                  this peer-reviewed and published study                  whether 9/11 exposures, including                      Wildlife Service (Service), announce a
                                                  in the submissions provides sufficient                  inhalational dust/debris exposures or                  proposal to list the following five
                                                  medical basis to be considered a valid                  psychological exposures of the duration                tarantula species under the Endangered
                                                  petition, Mani et al. [2013] is not an                  and magnitude experienced on and in                    Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act):
                                                  epidemiologic study, cannot be                          the aftermath of September 11, 2001,                   Poecilotheria fasciata, P. ornata, P.
                                                  considered relevant, and is not further                 could cause the development of                         smithi, P. subfusca, and P. vittata. This
                                                  reviewed below.                                         atherosclerosis in an individual WTC                   document also serves as the 12-month
                                                                                                          responder or survivor several years                    finding on a petition to list these
                                                  C. Review of Scientific and Medical                     later. The Administrator looks forward                 species. After review of the best
                                                  Information and Administrator                           to more definitive studies that directly               available scientific and commercial
                                                  Determination                                           evaluate the causal association between                information, we find that listing each of
                                                     In response to Petition 012, and                     9/11 exposures, especially inhalational                these species is warranted and propose
                                                  pursuant to Program policy,10 the                       dust exposures, and atherosclerosis.                   listing all of them as endangered
                                                  Program conducted a review of the                                                                              species.
                                                                                                          E. Approval To Submit Document to the
                                                  scientific literature on atherosclerosis to             Office of the Federal Register                         DATES:  We will accept comments
                                                  determine if the available evidence has                                                                        received or postmarked on or before
                                                  the potential to provide a basis for a                    The Secretary, HHS, or her designee,
                                                                                                          the Director, Centers for Disease Control              February 13, 2017. Comments submitted
                                                  decision on whether to add                                                                                     electronically using the Federal
                                                  atherosclerosis to the List.11 The                      and Prevention (CDC) and
                                                                                                          Administrator, Agency for Toxic                        eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES
                                                  literature search identified one citation                                                                      below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
                                                  for atherosclerosis; 12 upon review,                    Substances and Disease Registry
                                                                                                          (ATSDR), authorized the undersigned,                   Eastern Time on the closing date. We
                                                                                                                                                                 must receive requests for public
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                    9 Mani V, Wong S, Sawit S, et al. [2013],             the Administrator of the WTC Health
                                                                                                          Program, to sign and submit the                        hearings, in writing, at the address
                                                  Relationship between Particulate Matter Exposure
                                                  and Atherogenic Profile in ‘‘Ground Zero’’ Workers                                                             shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
                                                  as Shown by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR                                                                       CONTACT by January 30, 2017.
                                                                                                          25 Years of Translational Research for Public
                                                  Imaging, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:827–833.           Health, Environ Health Perspect 123(10):909–918.       ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
                                                    10 Supra note 3.
                                                                                                          This manuscript describes the successes of the         by one of the following methods:
                                                    11 Databases searched include: CINAHL, Embase,
                                                                                                          Superfund Research Program; although the key
                                                  PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus.                           terms ‘‘atherosclerosis’’ and ‘‘World Trade Center’’
                                                                                                                                                                   (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
                                                    12 Landrigan PJ, Wright RO, Cordero JF, et al.        are both mentioned, they are not discussed in          eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                  [2015], The NIEHS Superfund Research Program:           relation to each other.                                www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:32 Dec 13, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00043   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1



Document Created: 2016-12-14 00:48:14
Document Modified: 2016-12-14 00:48:14
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionDenial of petition for addition of a health condition.
DatesThe Administrator of the WTC Health Program is denying this petition for the addition of a health condition as of December 14, 2016.
ContactRachel Weiss, Program Analyst, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS: C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226; telephone (855) 818- 1629 (this is a toll-free number); email [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 90295 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR