81_FR_90576 81 FR 90336 - 36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

81 FR 90336 - 36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 240 (December 14, 2016)

Page Range90336-90338
FR Document2016-29973

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated July 21, 1996.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90336-90338]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 16-65]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 
July 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Young, DSCA/SE&E-RAN, (703) 697-
9107.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 16-65 with attached Policy Justification 
and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 9, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[[Page 90337]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14DE16.023


[[Page 90338]]


Transmittal No. 16-65
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section 
36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended
    (i) Prospective Purchaser: Government of Finland
    (ii) Total Estimated Value:

Major Defense Equipment *................  $57 million
Other....................................  $99 million
                                          ------------------------------
  TOTAL..................................  $156 million
 

    (iii) Description and Quantity or Quantities of Articles or 
Services under Consideration for Purchase:
    Major Defense Equipment (MDE):
Ninety (90) Multifunctional Information Distribution System Joint 
Tactical Radio System (MIDS-JTRS) Variant(s)
    Non-MDE includes:
    Follow-on equipment and support for Finland's F/A-18 Mid-Life 
Upgrade (MLU) program includes software test and integration center 
upgrades, flight testing, spare and repair parts, support and test 
equipment, transportation, publications and technical documentation, 
personnel training and training equipment, U.S. Government and 
contractor technical and logistics support services, and other related 
elements of logistics support.
    (iv) Military Department: Navy
    (v) Prior Related Cases, if any:
FMS case FI-P-SAA $2.4 billion--9 Jun 1992
FMS case FI-P-SAB $675 million--7 Feb 1994
FMS case FI-P-GAD $25 million--13 Jul 2001
FMS case FI-P-LBB $63 million--4 Aug 2001
FMS case FI-P-LBC $127 million--1 Jan 2004
FMS case FI-P-LBD $252 million--25 Jul 2007
FMS case FI-P-LBH $307 million--3 Apr 2009
FMS case FI-P-GAU $170 million--27 Jun 2013
    (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, Offered, or Agreed to be 
Paid: None
    (vii) Sensitivity of Technology Contained in the Defense Article or 
Defense Services Proposed to be Sold: See Annex Attached
    (viii) Date Report Delivered to Congress: December 2, 2016
    * as defined in Section 47(6) of the Arms Export Control Act.

POLICY JUSTIFICATION

Government of Finland--F-18 Mid-Life Upgrade Program

    The Government of Finland has requested a possible sale of follow-
on equipment and support for Finland's F/A-18 Mid-Life Upgrade (MLU) 
program, consisting of: Ninety (90) Multifunctional Information 
Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS-JTRS) variant(s). 
The proposed program support also includes software test and 
integration center upgrades, flight testing, spare and repair parts, 
support and test equipment, transportation, publications and technical 
documentation, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. 
Government and contractor technical and logistics support services, and 
other related elements of logistics support. Total estimated program 
cost is $156 million.
    This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and 
national security objectives of the United State by helping to improve 
the security of a friendly country which has been and continues to be 
an important force for political stability and economic progress in 
Europe.
    The Finnish Air Force (FAF) intend to purchase this MLU program 
equipment and services to extend the useful life of its F/A-18 fighter 
aircraft and enhance their survivability and communications 
connectivity. The FDF needs this upgrade to keep pace with technology 
advances in sensors, weaponry, and communications. Finland has 
extensive experience operating the F/A-18 aircraft and will have no 
difficulty incorporating the upgraded capabilities into its forces.
    The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the 
basic military balance in the region.
    The principal contractors will be Raytheon in Waltham, 
Massachusetts; Lockheed Martin in Bethesda, Maryland; The Boeing 
Company in St. Louis, Missouri; BAE North America in Arlington, 
Virginia; General Electric in Fairfield, Connecticut; General Dynamics 
in West Falls Church, Virginia; Northrop Grumman in Falls Church, 
Virginia; Rockwell Collins in Cedar rapids, Iowa; ViaSat in Carlsbad, 
California; and Data Link Solutions in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. There are no 
known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential 
sale.
    Implementation of this proposed sale will require multiple trips to 
Finland involving U.S. Government and contractor representatives for 
technical reviews, support, and training.
    There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a 
result of this proposed sale.
Transmittal No. 16-65
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section 
36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act
Annex
Item No. vii
    (vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
    1. The Multifunctional Information Distribution System Joint 
Tactical Radio System (MIDS-JTRS) is not classified but is considered a 
COMSEC Controlled Item (CCI). There are no training devices, associated 
documentation, or services to be provided with the sale of these MIDS-
JTRS units. No sensitive information is provided or associated with 
this sale.
    2. All defense articles and services listed in this transmittal 
have been authorized for release and export to the Government of 
Finland.

[FR Doc. 2016-29973 Filed 12-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P



                                                90336                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Notices

                                                Transmittal No. 16–72                                    three (3) AGM–158B Separation Test                   hardened, soft and area type targets. The
                                                Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Vehicles. Also included are two (2)                                  extended range over the baseline was
                                                Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the AGM–158B Weapon System Simulators,                                  obtained by going from a turbo jet to a
                                                Arms Export Control Act, as amended                      F–16 operational flight plan upgrade for             turbo-fan engine and by reconfiguring
                                                                                                         the Polish F- 16C/D, JASSM–ER                        the fuel tanks for added capacity.
                                                   (i) Prospective Purchaser: Poland                     integration, missile containers, spare               Classification of the technical data and
                                                   (ii) Total Estimated Value:                           and repair parts, support and test                   information on the AGM–158’s
                                                Major Defense Equipment *                  $ 110 million equipment, publications and technical                performance, capabilities, systems, sub-
                                                Other .................................... $ 90 million documentation, personnel training and                 systems, operations, and maintenance
                                                                                                         training equipment, U.S. Government                  will range from UNCLASSIFIED to
                                                  TOTAL .............................. $ 200 million
                                                                                                         and contractor engineering, technical                SECRET.
                                                   (iii) Description and Quantity or                     and logistics support services, and other               2. If a technologically advanced
                                                Quantities of Articles or Services under                 related elements of logistical and                   adversary were to obtain knowledge of
                                                Consideration for Purchase:                              program support. The total estimated                 the specific hardware and software
                                                   Major Defense Equipment (MDE):                        program value is $200 million.                       elements, the information could be used
                                                Seventy (70) AGM–158B Joint Air-to-                         The proposed sale will contribute to              to develop countermeasures that might
                                                   Surface Standoff Missiles Extended                    the foreign policy and the national                  reduce weapon system effectiveness or
                                                   Range (JASSM–ER)                                      security objectives of the United States             be used in the development of a system
                                                Two (2) AGM–158B Flight Test                             by helping to improve the security of a              with similar or advanced capabilities.
                                                   Vehicles—Live Fire with TIK & FTS                     NATO ally. Poland continues to be an                    3. A determination has been made
                                                Two (2) AGM–158B Mass Simulant                           important force for political stability              that Poland can provide substantially
                                                   Vehicles                                              and economic progress in Central                     the same degree of protection for the
                                                One (1) AGM–158B Flight Test                             Europe.                                              sensitive technology being released as
                                                   Vehicle—Captive Carry                                    The proposed sale will improve                    the U.S. Government. This proposed
                                                Three (3) AGM–158B Separation Test                       Poland’s capability to meet current and              sale is necessary to further the US
                                                   Vehicles                                              future threats of enemy air and ground               foreign policy and national security
                                                   Non-MDE includes:                                     weapons systems. Poland will use the                 objectives outlined in the Policy
                                                   Two (2) AGM–158B Weapon System                        enhanced capability as a deterrent to                Justification.
                                                Simulators, F–16 operational flight plan regional threats and to strengthen its                                  4. All defense articles and services
                                                upgrade for the Polish F- 16C/D,                         homeland defense. These weapon and                   listed in this transmittal are authorized
                                                JASSM–ER integration, missile                            capabilities upgrades will allow Poland              for release and export to Poland.
                                                containers, spare and repair parts,                      to strengthen its air-to-ground strike
                                                                                                                                                              [FR Doc. 2016–29954 Filed 12–13–16; 8:45 am]
                                                support and test equipment,                              capabilities and increase its
                                                                                                                                                              BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
                                                publications and technical                               contribution to future NATO operations.
                                                documentation, personnel training and                    Poland will have no difficulty absorbing
                                                training equipment, U.S. Government                      these missiles into its armed forces.                DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                                                and contractor engineering, technical                       The proposed sale of this equipment
                                                and logistics support services, and other and support will not alter the basic                                Office of the Secretary
                                                related elements of logistical and                       military balance in the region.
                                                                                                            The prime contractor will be the
                                                program support.                                                                                              [Transmittal No. 16–65]
                                                                                                         Lockheed Martin of Ft. Worth, Texas.
                                                   (iv) Military Department: Air Force
                                                                                                         There are no known offset agreements                 36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
                                                (X7–D–YAD)
                                                                                                         proposed in connection with this
                                                (v) Prior Related Cases, if any: PL–D–
                                                                                                         potential sale.                                      AGENCY:  Department of Defense, Defense
                                                   SAC, PL–D–YAB and amendments                             Implementation of this proposed sale
                                                (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid,                                                                       Security Cooperation Agency.
                                                                                                         will not require the assignment of any               ACTION: Notice.
                                                   Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None
                                                                                                         additional U.S. Government or
                                                (vii) Sensitivity of Technology
                                                                                                         contractor representatives to Poland.                SUMMARY:   The Department of Defense is
                                                   Contained in the Defense Article or                      There will be no adverse impact on
                                                   Defense Services Proposed to be Sold: U.S. defense readiness as a result of this                           publishing the unclassified text of a
                                                   See Annex Attached                                                                                         section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.
                                                                                                         proposed sale.                                       This is published to fulfill the
                                                (viii) Date Report Delivered to Congress:
                                                   November 28, 2016                                     Transmittal No. 16–72                                requirements of section 155 of Public
                                                   * as defined in Section 47(6) of the                                                                       Law 104–164 dated July 21, 1996.
                                                                                                         Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
                                                Arms Export Control Act.                                                                                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam
                                                                                                         Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(l) of the
                                                                                                         Arms Export Control Act                              Young, DSCA/SE&E–RAN, (703) 697–
                                                POLICY JUSTIFICATION                                                                                          9107.
                                                Poland—JASSM–ER with Support                             Annex                                                   The following is a copy of a letter to
                                                  The Government of Poland has                          Item No. vii                                          the Speaker of the House of
                                                requested a possible sale of seventy (70)                                                                     Representatives, Transmittal 16–65 with
                                                                                                           (vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
                                                AGM–158B Joint Air-to-Surface                              1. The AGM–158B JASSM ER is an                     attached Policy Justification and
                                                                                                                                                              Sensitivity of Technology.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                Standoff Missiles Extended Range                        extended range low-observable, highly
                                                (JASSM–ER), two (2) AGM–158B Flight                     survivable subsonic cruise missile                      Dated: December 9, 2016.
                                                Test Vehicles, two (2) AGM–158B Mass                    designed to penetrate next generation                 Aaron Siegel,
                                                Simulant Vehicles, one (1) AGM–158B                     air defense systems en-route to target. It            Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
                                                Flight Test Vehicle—Captive Carry,                      is designed to kill hard, medium-                     Officer, Department of Defense.




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:45 Dec 13, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00019   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM   14DEN1


                         DEFEMSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGCENCY
                                    @01 t27h S"AEET $OUTH, BTE 208
                                       ABLINGTON, VA terte—sicg




The Honorable Paul D. Ryan
Speakeral the Houss
(.S. House of Representatives
Washingion.MC 20515

Dear Mr. Spesker:

        Pursgant tn the reportmg requimements of Section 36(b)( 1 ) of the Arms Export Conotral

Aol onnemded, we ars forwacding berewith Transouttal No: 10—65, concerming the Department

of the.Navy‘s poppsed Lerers) of Offer «nActupianee for the—Gavemment of Finland for

defense articles and services eatimated to cost §156 inffion, Alter tms Tether is delverdd to: pour

office. we plan to issoe o news release rnotffy the public l this proposed ko

                                               incerely,
                                              QLQ& e
                                                "Abnuies Lalintmm
                                       2.      [b prtd)
                                        59¢   J Wo Rixey
                                              Vice Adnviral, LSX
                                              Tnreutnr

Eaclosunes:
1. ‘Transratital
2. Policy Justfication
3.   Renaitisity of Technology


                                                90338                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Notices

                                                Transmittal No. 16–65                                            consisting of: Ninety (90)                            Transmittal No. 16–65
                                                Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of                         Multifunctional Information                           Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
                                                Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the                        Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio              Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the
                                                Arms Export Control Act, as amended                              System (MIDS–JTRS) variant(s). The                    Arms Export Control Act
                                                                                                                 proposed program support also includes
                                                  (i) Prospective Purchaser: Government                          software test and integration center                  Annex
                                                of Finland                                                       upgrades, flight testing, spare and repair            Item No. vii
                                                  (ii) Total Estimated Value:
                                                                                                                 parts, support and test equipment,                       (vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
                                                Major Defense Equipment * ..                   $57 million       transportation, publications and
                                                Other ......................................   $99 million                                                                1. The Multifunctional Information
                                                                                                                 technical documentation, personnel                    Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio
                                                   TOTAL ...............................       $156 million      training and training equipment, U.S.                 System (MIDS–JTRS) is not classified
                                                                                                                 Government and contractor technical                   but is considered a COMSEC Controlled
                                                   (iii) Description and Quantity or
                                                                                                                 and logistics support services, and other             Item (CCI). There are no training
                                                Quantities of Articles or Services under
                                                Consideration for Purchase:                                      related elements of logistics support.                devices, associated documentation, or
                                                   Major Defense Equipment (MDE):                                Total estimated program cost is $156                  services to be provided with the sale of
                                                Ninety (90) Multifunctional Information                          million.                                              these MIDS–JTRS units. No sensitive
                                                   Distribution System Joint Tactical                               This proposed sale will contribute to              information is provided or associated
                                                   Radio System (MIDS–JTRS) Variant(s)                           the foreign policy and national security              with this sale.
                                                   Non-MDE includes:                                             objectives of the United State by helping                2. All defense articles and services
                                                   Follow-on equipment and support for                           to improve the security of a friendly                 listed in this transmittal have been
                                                Finland’s F/A–18 Mid-Life Upgrade                                                                                      authorized for release and export to the
                                                                                                                 country which has been and continues
                                                (MLU) program includes software test                                                                                   Government of Finland.
                                                                                                                 to be an important force for political
                                                and integration center upgrades, flight                          stability and economic progress in                    [FR Doc. 2016–29973 Filed 12–13–16; 8:45 am]
                                                testing, spare and repair parts, support                         Europe.                                               BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
                                                and test equipment, transportation,
                                                publications and technical                                          The Finnish Air Force (FAF) intend to
                                                documentation, personnel training and                            purchase this MLU program equipment                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                                                training equipment, U.S. Government                              and services to extend the useful life of
                                                and contractor technical and logistics                           its F/A–18 fighter aircraft and enhance               Office of the Secretary
                                                support services, and other related                              their survivability and communications
                                                                                                                                                                       [Docket ID DOD–2014–OS–0077]
                                                elements of logistics support.                                   connectivity. The FDF needs this
                                                   (iv) Military Department: Navy                                upgrade to keep pace with technology                  Proposed Collection; Comment
                                                   (v) Prior Related Cases, if any:                              advances in sensors, weaponry, and                    Request
                                                FMS case FI–P–SAA $2.4 billion—9 Jun                             communications. Finland has extensive
                                                   1992                                                          experience operating the F/A–18 aircraft              AGENCY:   Defense Security Service, DoD.
                                                FMS case FI–P–SAB $675 million—7                                 and will have no difficulty                           ACTION:   Notice.
                                                   Feb 1994                                                      incorporating the upgraded capabilities
                                                FMS case FI–P–GAD $25 million—13                                 into its forces.                                      SUMMARY:    In compliance with the
                                                   Jul 2001                                                                                                            Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
                                                                                                                    The proposed sale of this equipment                Defense Security Service (DSS)
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBB $63 million—4 Aug
                                                                                                                 and support will not alter the basic                  announces a proposed public
                                                   2001
                                                                                                                 military balance in the region.                       information collection and seeks public
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBC $127 million—1
                                                   Jan 2004                                                         The principal contractors will be                  comment on the provisions thereof.
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBD $252 million—25                                Raytheon in Waltham, Massachusetts;                   Comments are invited on: Whether the
                                                   Jul 2007                                                      Lockheed Martin in Bethesda,                          proposed collection of information is
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBH $307 million—3                                 Maryland; The Boeing Company in St.                   necessary for the proper performance of
                                                   Apr 2009                                                      Louis, Missouri; BAE North America in                 the functions of the agency, including
                                                FMS case FI–P–GAU $170 million—27                                Arlington, Virginia; General Electric in              whether the information shall have
                                                   Jun 2013                                                      Fairfield, Connecticut; General                       practical utility; the accuracy of the
                                                   (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid,                       Dynamics in West Falls Church,                        agency’s estimate of the burden of the
                                                Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None                                                                                    proposed information collection; ways
                                                                                                                 Virginia; Northrop Grumman in Falls
                                                   (vii) Sensitivity of Technology                                                                                     to enhance the quality, utility, and
                                                                                                                 Church, Virginia; Rockwell Collins in
                                                Contained in the Defense Article or                                                                                    clarity of the information to be
                                                                                                                 Cedar rapids, Iowa; ViaSat in Carlsbad,
                                                Defense Services Proposed to be Sold:                                                                                  collected; and ways to minimize the
                                                                                                                 California; and Data Link Solutions in                burden of the information collection on
                                                See Annex Attached                                               Cedar Rapids, Iowa. There are no known
                                                   (viii) Date Report Delivered to                                                                                     respondents, including through the use
                                                                                                                 offset agreements proposed in                         of automated collection techniques or
                                                Congress: December 2, 2016                                       connection with this potential sale.
                                                   * as defined in Section 47(6) of the                                                                                other forms of information technology.
                                                Arms Export Control Act.                                            Implementation of this proposed sale               DATES: Consideration will be given to all
                                                                                                                 will require multiple trips to Finland                comments received by February 13,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                POLICY JUSTIFICATION                                             involving U.S. Government and                         2017.
                                                Government of Finland—F–18 Mid-Life                              contractor representatives for technical
                                                                                                                                                                       ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments,
                                                Upgrade Program                                                  reviews, support, and training.                       identified by docket number and title,
                                                  The Government of Finland has                                     There will be no adverse impact on                 by any of the following methods:
                                                requested a possible sale of follow-on                           U.S. defense readiness as a result of this              • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                equipment and support for Finland’s F/                           proposed sale.                                        www.regulations.gov. Follow the
                                                A–18 Mid-Life Upgrade (MLU) program,                                                                                   instructions for submitting comments.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014        18:45 Dec 13, 2016       Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00021   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM   14DEN1



Document Created: 2016-12-14 00:48:24
Document Modified: 2016-12-14 00:48:24
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactPam Young, DSCA/SE&E-RAN, (703) 697- 9107.
FR Citation81 FR 90336 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR