81_FR_90578 81 FR 90338 - Proposed Collection; Comment Request

81 FR 90338 - Proposed Collection; Comment Request

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 240 (December 14, 2016)

Page Range90338-90339
FR Document2016-30023

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Defense Security Service (DSS) announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90338-90339]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2014-OS-0077]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Defense Security Service, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 
Defense Security Service (DSS) announces a proposed public information 
collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments 
are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information shall have practical utility; the 
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed 
information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the 
burden of the information collection on respondents, including through 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 
13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

[[Page 90339]]

     Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief 
Management Officer, Directorate for Oversight and Compliance, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, Mailbox #24, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.

    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    Any associated form(s) for this collection may be located within 
this same electronic docket and downloaded for review/testing. Follow 
the instructions at http://www.regulations.gov for submitting comments. 
Please submit comments on any given form identified by docket number, 
form number, and title.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this 
proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and 
associated collection instruments, please write to the Defense Security 
Service, ATTN: Mr. Corey Beckett, Chief Finanical Officer, 27130 
Telegraph Road, Quantico, VA 22134.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: National Industrial 
Security Program Cost Collection Survey; DSS Form 232; OMB Control 
Number 0704-0458.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
as a result of Executive Order 12829, ``National Industrial Security 
Program,'' which requires the Department of Defense to account each 
year for the costs associated with implementation of the National 
Industrial Security Program and report those costs to the Director of 
the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO).
    Affected Public: Business or other for profit; Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Annual Burden Hours: 507.
    Number of Respondents: 1,014.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,014.
    Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Collection of this data is required to comply with the reporting 
requirements of Executive Order 12829, ``National Industrial Security 
Program.'' This collection of information requests the assistance of 
the Facility Security Officer to provide estimates of annual security 
labor cost in burdened, current year dollars and the estimated 
percentage of security labor dollars to the total security costs for 
the facility. Security labor is defined as personnel whose positions 
exist to support operations and staff in the implementation of 
government security requirements for the protect ion of classified 
information. Guards who are required as supplemental controls are 
included in security labor. This data will be incorporated into a 
report produced to ISOO for the estimated cost of securing classified 
information within industry. The survey will be distributed 
electronically via a Web-based commercial survey tool.

    Dated: December 9, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2016-30023 Filed 12-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P



                                                90338                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Notices

                                                Transmittal No. 16–65                                            consisting of: Ninety (90)                            Transmittal No. 16–65
                                                Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of                         Multifunctional Information                           Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
                                                Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the                        Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio              Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the
                                                Arms Export Control Act, as amended                              System (MIDS–JTRS) variant(s). The                    Arms Export Control Act
                                                                                                                 proposed program support also includes
                                                  (i) Prospective Purchaser: Government                          software test and integration center                  Annex
                                                of Finland                                                       upgrades, flight testing, spare and repair            Item No. vii
                                                  (ii) Total Estimated Value:
                                                                                                                 parts, support and test equipment,                       (vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
                                                Major Defense Equipment * ..                   $57 million       transportation, publications and
                                                Other ......................................   $99 million                                                                1. The Multifunctional Information
                                                                                                                 technical documentation, personnel                    Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio
                                                   TOTAL ...............................       $156 million      training and training equipment, U.S.                 System (MIDS–JTRS) is not classified
                                                                                                                 Government and contractor technical                   but is considered a COMSEC Controlled
                                                   (iii) Description and Quantity or
                                                                                                                 and logistics support services, and other             Item (CCI). There are no training
                                                Quantities of Articles or Services under
                                                Consideration for Purchase:                                      related elements of logistics support.                devices, associated documentation, or
                                                   Major Defense Equipment (MDE):                                Total estimated program cost is $156                  services to be provided with the sale of
                                                Ninety (90) Multifunctional Information                          million.                                              these MIDS–JTRS units. No sensitive
                                                   Distribution System Joint Tactical                               This proposed sale will contribute to              information is provided or associated
                                                   Radio System (MIDS–JTRS) Variant(s)                           the foreign policy and national security              with this sale.
                                                   Non-MDE includes:                                             objectives of the United State by helping                2. All defense articles and services
                                                   Follow-on equipment and support for                           to improve the security of a friendly                 listed in this transmittal have been
                                                Finland’s F/A–18 Mid-Life Upgrade                                                                                      authorized for release and export to the
                                                                                                                 country which has been and continues
                                                (MLU) program includes software test                                                                                   Government of Finland.
                                                                                                                 to be an important force for political
                                                and integration center upgrades, flight                          stability and economic progress in                    [FR Doc. 2016–29973 Filed 12–13–16; 8:45 am]
                                                testing, spare and repair parts, support                         Europe.                                               BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
                                                and test equipment, transportation,
                                                publications and technical                                          The Finnish Air Force (FAF) intend to
                                                documentation, personnel training and                            purchase this MLU program equipment                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                                                training equipment, U.S. Government                              and services to extend the useful life of
                                                and contractor technical and logistics                           its F/A–18 fighter aircraft and enhance               Office of the Secretary
                                                support services, and other related                              their survivability and communications
                                                                                                                                                                       [Docket ID DOD–2014–OS–0077]
                                                elements of logistics support.                                   connectivity. The FDF needs this
                                                   (iv) Military Department: Navy                                upgrade to keep pace with technology                  Proposed Collection; Comment
                                                   (v) Prior Related Cases, if any:                              advances in sensors, weaponry, and                    Request
                                                FMS case FI–P–SAA $2.4 billion—9 Jun                             communications. Finland has extensive
                                                   1992                                                          experience operating the F/A–18 aircraft              AGENCY:   Defense Security Service, DoD.
                                                FMS case FI–P–SAB $675 million—7                                 and will have no difficulty                           ACTION:   Notice.
                                                   Feb 1994                                                      incorporating the upgraded capabilities
                                                FMS case FI–P–GAD $25 million—13                                 into its forces.                                      SUMMARY:    In compliance with the
                                                   Jul 2001                                                                                                            Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
                                                                                                                    The proposed sale of this equipment                Defense Security Service (DSS)
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBB $63 million—4 Aug
                                                                                                                 and support will not alter the basic                  announces a proposed public
                                                   2001
                                                                                                                 military balance in the region.                       information collection and seeks public
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBC $127 million—1
                                                   Jan 2004                                                         The principal contractors will be                  comment on the provisions thereof.
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBD $252 million—25                                Raytheon in Waltham, Massachusetts;                   Comments are invited on: Whether the
                                                   Jul 2007                                                      Lockheed Martin in Bethesda,                          proposed collection of information is
                                                FMS case FI–P–LBH $307 million—3                                 Maryland; The Boeing Company in St.                   necessary for the proper performance of
                                                   Apr 2009                                                      Louis, Missouri; BAE North America in                 the functions of the agency, including
                                                FMS case FI–P–GAU $170 million—27                                Arlington, Virginia; General Electric in              whether the information shall have
                                                   Jun 2013                                                      Fairfield, Connecticut; General                       practical utility; the accuracy of the
                                                   (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid,                       Dynamics in West Falls Church,                        agency’s estimate of the burden of the
                                                Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None                                                                                    proposed information collection; ways
                                                                                                                 Virginia; Northrop Grumman in Falls
                                                   (vii) Sensitivity of Technology                                                                                     to enhance the quality, utility, and
                                                                                                                 Church, Virginia; Rockwell Collins in
                                                Contained in the Defense Article or                                                                                    clarity of the information to be
                                                                                                                 Cedar rapids, Iowa; ViaSat in Carlsbad,
                                                Defense Services Proposed to be Sold:                                                                                  collected; and ways to minimize the
                                                                                                                 California; and Data Link Solutions in                burden of the information collection on
                                                See Annex Attached                                               Cedar Rapids, Iowa. There are no known
                                                   (viii) Date Report Delivered to                                                                                     respondents, including through the use
                                                                                                                 offset agreements proposed in                         of automated collection techniques or
                                                Congress: December 2, 2016                                       connection with this potential sale.
                                                   * as defined in Section 47(6) of the                                                                                other forms of information technology.
                                                Arms Export Control Act.                                            Implementation of this proposed sale               DATES: Consideration will be given to all
                                                                                                                 will require multiple trips to Finland                comments received by February 13,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                POLICY JUSTIFICATION                                             involving U.S. Government and                         2017.
                                                Government of Finland—F–18 Mid-Life                              contractor representatives for technical
                                                                                                                                                                       ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments,
                                                Upgrade Program                                                  reviews, support, and training.                       identified by docket number and title,
                                                  The Government of Finland has                                     There will be no adverse impact on                 by any of the following methods:
                                                requested a possible sale of follow-on                           U.S. defense readiness as a result of this              • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                equipment and support for Finland’s F/                           proposed sale.                                        www.regulations.gov. Follow the
                                                A–18 Mid-Life Upgrade (MLU) program,                                                                                   instructions for submitting comments.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014        18:45 Dec 13, 2016       Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00021   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM   14DEN1


                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Notices                                                90339

                                                   • Mail: Department of Defense, Office                   Needs and Uses: The information                    distributed electronically via a Web-
                                                of the Deputy Chief Management                          collection requirement is necessary as a              based commercial survey tool.
                                                Officer, Directorate for Oversight and                  result of Executive Order 12829,                        Dated: December 9, 2016.
                                                Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive,                     ‘‘National Industrial Security Program,’’             Aaron Siegel,
                                                Mailbox #24, Alexandria, VA 22350–                      which requires the Department of
                                                                                                                                                              Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
                                                1700.                                                   Defense to account each year for the
                                                                                                                                                              Officer, Department of Defense.
                                                   Instructions: All submissions received               costs associated with implementation of
                                                                                                                                                              [FR Doc. 2016–30023 Filed 12–13–16; 8:45 am]
                                                must include the agency name, docket                    the National Industrial Security Program
                                                                                                        and report those costs to the Director of             BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
                                                number and title for this Federal
                                                Register document. The general policy                   the Information Security Oversight
                                                for comments and other submissions                      Office (ISOO).
                                                                                                           Affected Public: Business or other for             DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                                                from members of the public is to make
                                                these submissions available for public                  profit; Not-for-profit institutions.
                                                                                                           Annual Burden Hours: 507.                          Office of the Secretary
                                                viewing on the Internet at http://                         Number of Respondents: 1,014.
                                                www.regulations.gov as they are                            Responses per Respondent: 1.                       [Transmittal No. 16–54]
                                                received without change, including any                     Annual Responses: 1,014.
                                                personal identifiers or contact                            Average Burden per Response: 30                    36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
                                                information.                                            minutes.
                                                   Any associated form(s) for this                         Frequency: Annually.                               AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation
                                                collection may be located within this                      Collection of this data is required to             Agency, Department of Defense.
                                                same electronic docket and downloaded                   comply with the reporting requirements
                                                for review/testing. Follow the                          of Executive Order 12829, ‘‘National                  ACTION:   Notice.
                                                instructions at http://                                 Industrial Security Program.’’ This
                                                www.regulations.gov for submitting                      collection of information requests the                SUMMARY:  The Department of Defense is
                                                comments. Please submit comments on                     assistance of the Facility Security                   publishing the unclassified text of a
                                                any given form identified by docket                     Officer to provide estimates of annual                section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.
                                                number, form number, and title.                         security labor cost in burdened, current              This is published to fulfill the
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To                     year dollars and the estimated                        requirements of section 155 of Public
                                                request more information on this                        percentage of security labor dollars to               Law 104–164 dated July 21, 1996.
                                                proposed information collection or to                   the total security costs for the facility.            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:      Pam
                                                obtain a copy of the proposal and                       Security labor is defined as personnel                Young, DSCA/SE&E–RAN, (703) 697–
                                                associated collection instruments,                      whose positions exist to support                      9107.
                                                please write to the Defense Security                    operations and staff in the
                                                Service, ATTN: Mr. Corey Beckett, Chief                 implementation of government security                    The following is a copy of a letter to
                                                Finanical Officer, 27130 Telegraph                      requirements for the protect ion of                   the Speaker of the House of
                                                Road, Quantico, VA 22134.                               classified information. Guards who are                Representatives, Transmittal 16–54 with
                                                                                                        required as supplemental controls are                 attached Policy Justification and
                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                  Title; Associated Form; and OMB                       included in security labor. This data                 Sensitivity of Technology.
                                                Number: National Industrial Security                    will be incorporated into a report                      Dated: December 9, 2016.
                                                Program Cost Collection Survey; DSS                     produced to ISOO for the estimated cost               Aaron Siegel,
                                                Form 232; OMB Control Number 0704–                      of securing classified information                    Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
                                                0458.                                                   within industry. The survey will be                   Officer, Department of Defense.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:45 Dec 13, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00022   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM   14DEN1



Document Created: 2016-12-14 00:48:39
Document Modified: 2016-12-14 00:48:39
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesConsideration will be given to all comments received by February 13, 2017.
ContactTo request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Defense Security Service, ATTN: Mr. Corey Beckett, Chief Finanical Officer, 27130 Telegraph Road, Quantico, VA 22134.
FR Citation81 FR 90338 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR