81_FR_91084 81 FR 90843 - Chemical Data Reporting; Requirements for Inorganic Byproduct Chemical Substances; Notice of Intent To Negotiate

81 FR 90843 - Chemical Data Reporting; Requirements for Inorganic Byproduct Chemical Substances; Notice of Intent To Negotiate

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 241 (December 15, 2016)

Page Range90843-90848
FR Document2016-30177

EPA is giving notice that it intends to establish a Negotiated Rulemaking Committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act (NRA). The objective of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will be to negotiate a proposed rule that would limit chemical data reporting requirements under section 8(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), as amended by the Frank. R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, for manufacturers of any inorganic byproduct chemical substances, when such byproduct chemical substances are subsequently recycled, reused, or reprocessed. The purpose of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will be to conduct discussions in a good faith attempt to reach consensus on proposed regulatory language. This negotiation process is required by section 8(a)(6) of TSCA. The Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will consist of representatives of parties with a definable stake in the outcome of the proposed requirements.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90843-90848]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0597; FRL-9954-68]


Chemical Data Reporting; Requirements for Inorganic Byproduct 
Chemical Substances; Notice of Intent To Negotiate

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee 
and Negotiate a Proposed Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is giving notice that it intends to establish a Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act

[[Page 90844]]

(FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act (NRA). The objective of the 
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will be to negotiate a proposed rule 
that would limit chemical data reporting requirements under section 
8(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), as amended by the 
Frank. R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, for 
manufacturers of any inorganic byproduct chemical substances, when such 
byproduct chemical substances are subsequently recycled, reused, or 
reprocessed. The purpose of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will be 
to conduct discussions in a good faith attempt to reach consensus on 
proposed regulatory language. This negotiation process is required by 
section 8(a)(6) of TSCA. The Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will 
consist of representatives of parties with a definable stake in the 
outcome of the proposed requirements.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0597, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: 
Susan Sharkey, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 564-8789; email address: [email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture 
(including manufacture as a byproduct chemical substance) or import 
chemical substances listed on the TSCA Inventory. The following list of 
North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes are not 
intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers 
determine whether this action may apply to them:
     Chemical manufacturers and importers (NAICS codes 325 and 
324110; e.g., chemical manufacturing and processing and petroleum 
refineries).
     Chemical users and processors who may manufacture a 
byproduct chemical substance (NAICS codes 22, 322, 331, and 3344; e.g., 
utilities, paper manufacturing, primary metal manufacturing, and 
semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing).
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this 
action to a particular entity, consult the technical person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of 
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk 
or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM 
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting 
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Background

A. What action is the Agency taking?

    As required by the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1996 (NRA), EPA is 
giving notice that the Agency intends to establish a Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee. The objective of this Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee will be to develop a proposed rule providing for limiting 
chemical data reporting requirements, under TSCA section 8(a), for 
manufacturers of any inorganic byproduct chemical substances, when such 
byproduct chemical substances are subsequently recycled, reused, or 
reprocessed. This negotiation process, which includes the establishment 
of a federal advisory committee, is required by section 8(a)(6) of the 
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), as amended by the Frank. R. 
Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (``Lautenberg 
Act'').

B. What is the Agency's authority for this action?

    This notice announcing EPA's intent to establish a Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee to negotiate a proposed regulation was developed 
under the authority of sections 563 and 564 of the Negotiated 
Rulemaking Act (NRA) (5 U.S.C. 561, Pub. L. 104-320). This Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee will be a statutory committee under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 9(a)(1)). Any 
proposed regulation resulting from the negotiation process would be 
developed under the authority of TSCA section 8 (15 U.S.C. 2607), as 
amended by the Lautenberg Act (Pub. L. 114-182).

III. Negotiated Rulemaking

A. Why is the Agency pursuing a negotiated rulemaking?

    In the Lautenberg Act, Congress mandated that EPA undertake a 
negotiation process, pursuant to the NRA, aimed at developing a rule to 
limit TSCA section 8(a) chemical data reporting requirements for 
manufacturers of any inorganic byproduct chemical substances, when such 
byproduct chemical substances are subsequently recycled, reused, or 
reprocessed.
    EPA sees potential benefits from undertaking this negotiated 
rulemaking process. A regulatory negotiation process will allow EPA to 
engage directly with informed, interested, and affected parties, all of 
whom are working together to resolve their differences. Because a 
negotiating committee includes representatives from the major 
stakeholder groups affected by or interested in the rule, the number of 
public comments on any proposed rule may be reduced and those comments 
that are received may be more moderate. EPA anticipates that few 
substantive changes would be

[[Page 90845]]

needed to any proposed rule resulting from the negotiated rulemaking 
process. Finally, EPA recognizes an observation of the Administrative 
Conference of the United States: ``Experience indicates that if the 
parties in interest were to work together to negotiate the text of a 
proposed rule, they might be able in some circumstances to identify the 
major issues, gauge their importance to the respective parties, 
identify the information and data necessary to resolve the issues, and 
develop a rule that is acceptable to the respective interests, all 
within the contours of the substantive statute.'' ACUS Recommendation 
82-4.

B. What is the concept of negotiated rulemaking?

    Negotiated rulemaking is a process in which a proposed rule is 
developed by a committee composed of representatives of all those 
interests that will be significantly affected by the rule. Decisions 
are made by consensus, which the NRA defines as the unanimous 
concurrence among interests represented on a Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee, unless the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee itself 
unanimously agrees to use a different definition. To start the process, 
the Agency identifies all interests potentially affected by the 
rulemaking under consideration. To help in this identification process, 
the Agency publishes a notice in the Federal Register, such as this 
one, which identifies a preliminary list of interests and requests 
public comment on that list. Following receipt of the comments, the 
Agency establishes a committee representing these various interests to 
negotiate a consensus on the terms of a proposed rule. Representation 
on the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee may be direct, that is, each 
member represents a specific interest, or may be indirect, through 
coalitions of parties formed for this purpose. The Agency is a member 
of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee representing the Federal 
government's own set of interests. The Negotiated Rulemaking Committee 
is facilitated by a trained mediator, who facilitates the negotiation 
process. The role of this mediator, or facilitator, is to apply proven 
consensus building techniques to the advisory committee setting.
    If a regulatory negotiation advisory committee reaches consensus on 
the provisions of a proposed rule, the Agency, consistent with its 
legal obligations, would use such consensus as the basis of a proposed 
rule, to be published in the Federal Register. This provides the 
required public notice and allows for a public comment period. All 
participants and interested parties would retain their rights to 
comment and to seek judicial review. EPA anticipates, however, that any 
preproposal consensus agreed upon by this Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee would effectively address all major issues prior to 
publication of a proposed rulemaking.

C. What is the Agency commitment?

    In initiating this regulatory negotiation process, EPA is making a 
commitment to provide adequate resources to ensure timely and 
successful completion of the process. This commitment includes making 
the process a priority activity for all representatives, components, 
officials, and personnel of the Agency who need to be involved in the 
rulemaking, from the time of initiation until such time as a final rule 
is issued or the process is expressly terminated. EPA will provide 
administrative support for the process and will take steps to ensure 
that the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee has the dedicated resources it 
requires to complete its work in a timely fashion. These include the 
provision or procurement of such support services as: Properly equipped 
space adequate for public meetings and caucuses; logistical support; 
distribution of background information; the service of a facilitator; 
and such additional research and other technical assistance as may be 
necessary. If there is consensus within the Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee, EPA will use the consensus to the maximum extent possible, 
consistent with the legal obligations of the Agency, as the basis for a 
rule proposed by the Agency for public notice and comment. The Agency 
is committed to working in good faith to seek consensus on a proposal 
that is consistent with the legal mandate of TSCA.

D. What is the negotiating consensus?

    A key principle of negotiated rulemaking is that agreement is by 
consensus of all the interests. Thus, no one interest or group of 
interests is able to control the process. Again, the NRA defines 
consensus as the unanimous concurrence among interests represented on a 
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, unless the Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee itself unanimously agrees to use a different definition. In 
addition, experience has demonstrated that using a trained mediator to 
facilitate this process will assist all potential parties, including 
EPA, to identify their interests in the rule and so to be able to 
reevaluate previously stated positions on issues involved in this 
rulemaking effort.

IV. Chemical Data Reporting for Inorganic Byproduct Chemical Substances

A. Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Framework

    Under TSCA, EPA regulates the manufacture, processing, 
distribution, use, and disposal of chemical substances in the United 
States. The TSCA Inventory of Chemical Substances (TSCA Inventory) 
lists the chemical substances which are manufactured or processed in 
the United States (also called ``existing chemical substances''). 
Chemical substances not on the TSCA Inventory are known as ``new 
chemical substances'' and are required to be reviewed through EPA's new 
chemical program (under TSCA section 5) prior to the commencement of 
manufacture or processing. There are over 85,000 chemical substances 
listed on the TSCA Inventory.
    In 1986, EPA created the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) 
regulation under TSCA section 8 to collect, every four years, limited 
information on the manufacture (which includes import) of organic 
chemical substances listed on the TSCA Inventory, thereby providing 
more up-to-date production volume information on the chemical 
substances in U.S. commerce. In 2005, EPA amended the IUR to require 
the reporting of information on inorganic chemical substances and to 
collect additional manufacturing, processing, and use information. EPA 
has since made additional changes to the reporting requirements, and in 
2011 changed the name of the reporting rule to Chemical Data Reporting. 
CDR regulations are currently codified at 40 CFR part 711. EPA believes 
CDR is the only current reporting obligation under TSCA section 8(a) 
that is likely to affect the manufacturers of inorganic byproduct 
chemical substances. Information collected under CDR is used to support 
Agency programs, providing exposure-related data for chemical 
substances subject to TSCA in U.S. commerce. This information is also 
made publicly available, to the extent possible while continuing to 
protect submitted information claimed as confidential business 
information.
    Manufacturers of inorganic chemical substances first reported under 
the IUR in 2006. They also reported under the CDR in 2012 and 2016. 
Specific reporting requirements for these manufacturers were phased in, 
to allow for the industry to better understand the reporting 
requirements and for EPA to

[[Page 90846]]

gain a better understanding of the industry. In recent years, the 
regulatory requirement to report byproduct chemical substances (and the 
availability of exemptions from that requirement) has been a frequent 
topic of discussion.

B. Inorganic Byproduct Chemical Substances Under CDR

    A byproduct chemical substance is a chemical substance produced 
without a separate commercial intent during the manufacture, 
processing, use, or disposal of another chemical substance or mixture. 
Such byproduct chemical substances may, or may not, in themselves have 
commercial value. They are nonetheless produced for the purpose of 
obtaining a commercial advantage. Because byproduct chemical substances 
are manufactured for a commercial purpose, such manufacturing is 
reportable under CDR unless covered by a specific reporting exemption. 
CDR contains a specific reporting exemption for the manufacture of 
byproduct chemical substances, limited to cases where those byproduct 
chemical substances are not used for any commercial purposes (or are 
only used for certain limited commercial purposes) after they are 
manufactured. 40 CFR 711.10(c). Inorganic byproduct chemical substances 
are often recycled. The recycling of a byproduct chemical substance may 
qualify as a commercial purpose beyond the limited commercial purposes 
encompassed by 40 CFR 711.10(c). If so, then the CDR exemption for the 
manufacturer of a byproduct chemical substance is unavailable.
    Beginning in 2006, EPA became aware of a variety of questions 
raised by the manufacturers of inorganic byproduct chemical substances 
about their obligations to report their manufacture of those byproduct 
chemical substances. EPA has since provided detailed guidance to 
address a variety of questions that have been raised. See 75 FR 49675-6 
(2010); 76 FR 50832-3, 50849-50851 (2011). In 2011, EPA also stated 
that it would examine CDR information related to byproduct chemical 
substances to identify whether there are segments of byproduct chemical 
substance manufacturing for which EPA can determine that there is no 
need for the CDR information to continue to be collected, either for 
2016 or for future reporting cycles. 76 FR 50832-3 (2011). EPA did not 
amend the CDR requirements for the 2016 reporting cycle. Documents 
providing information to assist inorganic byproduct chemical substance 
manufacturers with reporting under CDR requirements include: 
Instructions for the 2016 TSCA CDR (Ref. 1); CDR Byproduct and 
Recycling Scenarios (Ref. 2); TSCA CDR Fact Sheet for the Printed 
Circuit Board Industry (Ref. 3); and TSCA CDR Fact Sheet for Reporting 
Manufactured Chemical Substances from Metal Mining and Related 
Activities (Ref. 4).
    On June 22, 2016, TSCA was amended by the Lautenberg Act. TSCA now 
includes a requirement that EPA enter into a negotiated rulemaking, 
pursuant to the NRA, to develop and publish a proposed rule to limit 
the reporting requirements under TSCA section 8(a), for manufacturers 
of any inorganic byproduct chemical substances, when such byproduct 
chemical substances, whether by the byproduct chemical substance 
manufacturer or by any other person, are subsequently recycled, reused, 
or reprocessed. The objective of the negotiated rulemaking process is 
to develop and publish a proposed rule by June 22, 2019. In the event a 
proposed rule is developed through the negotiated rulemaking process, a 
final rule ``resulting from such negotiated rulemaking'' must be issued 
by December 22, 2019. 15 U.S.C. 2607(a)(6).
    EPA construes its obligation to propose and finalize a rule under 
TSCA section 8(a)(6) as being contingent on the Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee reaching a consensus. EPA's interpretation is based on 
several factors. First, TSCA section 8(a)(6)(A) does not give any 
direction on how CDR reporting requirements for the specified byproduct 
chemical substance manufacturers should be limited, other than 
directing that the particular limitations should be negotiated. Second, 
EPA's obligation to finalize a rule under TSCA section 8(a)(6)(B) 
presupposes that such rule would be one ``resulting from such 
negotiated rulemaking.'' While EPA would have authority to issue an 
amendment to the CDR even if negotiation failed to achieve a consensus, 
such a rule would not be a rule resulting from the negotiated 
rulemaking. Accordingly, TSCA section 8(a)(6)(B) presupposes that the 
negotiated rulemaking process reached a consensus in directing EPA to 
issue a final rule. If the obligation to issue a final rule is so 
contingent, then it stands to reason that the prior obligation to issue 
a proposal is similarly contingent. Third, the time allotted for 
issuing a final rule (i.e., six months) is relatively short, consistent 
with a presupposition that the proposal in question would be the 
product of a successful negotiation. As noted in Unit III., the process 
of responding to comment on a proposal would likely be simplified if 
that proposal is itself the result of a previously negotiated 
consensus. For the reasons described above, if consensus cannot be 
reached, and there is no agreement upon which to base a proposal, then 
there is no further statutory obligation to issue a proposal or a final 
rule.

V. Proposed Negotiating Procedures

A. Interests Involved

    Section 562 of the NRA defines the term ``interest'' as one of 
``multiple parties which have a similar point of view or which are 
likely to be affected in a similar manner.'' We anticipate that the 
following key interests are likely to be significantly affected by the 
rule to be addressed by the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee while 
negotiating how to limit CDR requirements for manufacturers of any 
inorganic byproduct chemical substances, when such byproduct chemical 
substances are subsequently recycled, reused, or reprocessed:
    [ssquf] Inorganic chemical manufacturers and processors, including 
metal mining and related activities;
    [ssquf] Recyclers, including scrap recyclers;
    [ssquf] Industry advocacy groups;
    [ssquf] Environmental advocacy groups;
    [ssquf] Federal, State, or Tribal governments; and
    [ssquf] Employee advocacy groups, such as labor unions.

B. Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Formation

    The Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will be formed and operated in 
full compliance with the requirements of FACA in a manner consistent 
with the requirements of the NRA.

C. Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Membership

    The Agency intends to conduct the negotiated rulemaking proceedings 
with particular attention to ensuring full and adequate representation 
of those interests that may be significantly affected by a rule 
providing for limiting CDR requirements for inorganic byproduct 
chemical substances. We have listed those interests likely to be 
significantly affected by a rule in Unit V.A., and the following list 
identifies the parties that the Agency has initially identified as 
representing interests likely to be significantly affected by a rule:

 Aluminum Association
 American Chemistry Council
 American Coal Ash Association

[[Page 90847]]

 Environmental Defense Fund
 Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries
 IPC--Association Connecting Electronics Industries
 North American Metals Council
 National Mining Association
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 Utility Solid Waste Activities Group

    The listed parties have been preliminarily identified by EPA as 
being either a potential member of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, 
or a potential member of a coalition that would in turn nominate a 
candidate to represent one of the significantly affected interests 
listed in Unit V.A. This list is not presented as a complete or 
exclusive list from which Negotiated Rulemaking Committee members will 
be selected, nor does inclusion on the list mean that a party on the 
list has agreed to participate as a member of the Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee or as a member of a coalition. This list merely indicates 
those parties that represent interests that EPA has tentatively 
identified as being significantly affected by a rule providing for 
limiting CDR requirements for inorganic byproduct chemical substances.
    EPA anticipates that the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will be 
comprised of approximately 10-25 members representing significantly 
affected interests. The EPA Administrator will select members carefully 
to ensure that there is a balanced representation of such interests on 
the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. EPA anticipates that the 
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will contain representatives from 
industry, environmental groups, and state, local, and tribal 
governments.
    One purpose of this document is to determine whether the negotiated 
rulemaking will significantly affect interests that are not listed in 
Unit V.A., as well as whether the list of parties the Agency has listed 
identifies accurately and comprehensively a group of stakeholders 
representing the significantly affected interests listed in Unit V.A. 
EPA requests comment and suggestions on the list of significantly 
affected interests, as well as the list of proposed representatives of 
those interests. EPA recognizes that any regulatory actions it takes 
under this program may at times affect various segments of society in 
different ways, and that this may in some cases produce unique 
interests in a rule based on demographic factors. Particular attention 
will be given by the Agency to ensure that any unique interests that 
have been identified in this regard, and that may be significantly 
affected by any rule resulting from the negotiation, are represented.
    This document affords potential participants the opportunity to 
request representation in the negotiations. Request such representation 
by submitting a comment as described under ADDRESSES in this notice.
    Section 565(b) of the NRA requires the Agency to limit membership 
on a Negotiated Rulemaking Committee to 25 members, unless the Agency 
determines that more members are necessary in order for the Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee to function or to achieve balanced membership. The 
Agency believes that the negotiating group should not exceed 25 
members, which would make it difficult to conduct effective 
negotiations. EPA is aware that there are many more than 25 potential 
participants to consider for the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. The 
Agency does not believe, nor does the NRA contemplate, that each 
significantly affected interest must participate directly in the 
negotiations; however, each significantly affected interest can be 
adequately represented. To have a successful negotiation, it is 
important for significantly affected interests to identify and form 
coalitions that adequately represent those interests. These coalitions, 
to provide adequate representation, must agree to support, both 
financially and technically, a member to the Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee whom they will choose to represent their interest. The Agency 
believes it is very important to recognize that interested parties who 
are not selected to membership on the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee 
can still make valuable contributions to this negotiated rulemaking 
effort in any of several ways:
     The party could request to be placed on the Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee mailing list, submitting written comments, as 
appropriate;
     The party could attend the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee 
meetings, which are open to the public, caucus with his or her 
interest's member on the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, or even 
address the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee (usually allowed at the end 
of an issue's discussion or the end of the session, as time permits); 
or
     The party could assist a workgroup that might be 
established by the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee.
    An advisory committee may convene informal workgroups to assist the 
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee in ``staffing'' various discrete and 
technical matters (e.g., researching or preparing summaries of the 
technical literature or comments on particular matters such as economic 
issues) so as to facilitate Negotiated Rulemaking Committee 
deliberations. They also might assist in estimating costs and drafting 
regulatory text on issues associated with the analysis of the 
affordability and benefits addressed, and formulating drafts of the 
various provisions and their justification previously developed by the 
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. Given their staffing function, 
workgroups usually consist of participants who have expertise or 
particular interest in the technical matter(s) being studied. Because 
it recognizes the importance of this staffing work for the Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee, EPA will provide appropriate administrative and 
technical expertise for such workgroups.
    EPA requests comment regarding particular appointments to 
membership on the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. Members can be 
individuals or organizations. If the effort is to be successful, 
participants should be able to fully and adequately represent the 
viewpoints of their respective interests. Those who wish to be 
appointed as members of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee should 
submit a request to EPA by submitting a comment as described under 
ADDRESSES in this notice. The list of potential Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee members provided earlier in this document includes those who 
have been initially identified by EPA as being either a potential 
member of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, or a potential member of 
a coalition that would in turn nominate a candidate to represent one of 
the significantly affected interests on the Negotiated Rulemaking 
Committee.
    EPA values and welcomes diversity. In an effort to obtain 
nominations of diverse candidates, EPA encourages nominations of women 
and men of all racial and ethnic groups.

D. Good Faith Negotiation

    Negotiated Rulemaking Committee members should be willing to 
negotiate in good faith and have the authority, from her or his 
constituency, to do so. The first step is to ensure that each member 
has good communications with her or his constituencies. An intra-
interest network of communication should be established to bring 
information from the support organization to the member at the table, 
and to take information from the table back to the support 
organization. Second, each organization or coalition should, therefore, 
designate as its

[[Page 90848]]

representative an official with credibility and authority to insure 
that needed information is provided and decisions are made in a timely 
fashion.
    Negotiated rulemaking efforts can require a very significant 
contribution of time by the appointed members. The convening meeting of 
the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee is expected to be held in March 
2017, and the work of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee is expected 
to conclude approximately in September 2017.
    Other qualities that can be very helpful are negotiating experience 
and skills, as well as sufficient technical knowledge to participate in 
substantive negotiations. Certain concepts are central to negotiating 
in good faith. One is the willingness to bring key issues to the 
bargaining table in an attempt to reach a consensus, instead of keeping 
issues in reserve. The second is a willingness to keep the issues at 
the table and not take them to other forums. Finally, good faith 
includes a willingness to move away from the type of positions usually 
taken in a more traditional rulemaking process, and instead explore 
openly with other parties all ideas that may emerge from the 
discussions of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee.

E. Facilitator

    The facilitator will not be involved with the substantive 
development of any proposed rule. Rather, the facilitator's role 
generally includes facilitating the meetings of the Negotiated 
Rulemaking Committee in an impartial manner and impartially assisting 
the members of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee in conducting 
discussions and negotiations.

F. EPA Representative

    The EPA representative will be a full and active participant in the 
consensus building negotiations. The Agency's representative will meet 
regularly with various senior Agency officials, briefing them on the 
negotiations and receiving their suggestions and advice, in order to 
effectively represent the Agency's views regarding the issues before 
the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. EPA's representative also will 
ensure that the entire spectrum of federal governmental interests 
affected by the rulemaking, including the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) and other Departments and agencies, are kept informed of 
the negotiations and encouraged to make their concerns known in a 
timely fashion.

VI. Comments Requested

    EPA requests comment on the extent to which the issues, interests, 
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee representatives, and procedures 
described in this document are adequate and appropriate.

VII. References

    The following is a listing of the documents that are specifically 
referenced in this document. The docket includes these documents and 
other information considered by EPA, including documents referenced 
within the documents that are included in the docket, even if the 
referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For 
assistance in locating these other documents, please consult the 
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

1. EPA (2016). Instructions for Reporting 2016 TSCA CDR, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/instructions_for_reporting_2016_tsca_cdr_13may2016.pdf. Retrieved 
October 21, 2016.
2. EPA (2012). CDR Byproduct and Recycling Scenarios, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/2012_cdr_byproducts_scenaros_0.pdf. Retrieved October 21, 2016.
3. EPA (2016). TSCA CDR Fact Sheet: Byproducts Reporting for the 
Printed Circuit Board Industry, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-02/documents/final_cdr_fact_sheet_printed_circuit_board_2_22_16.pdf. Retrieved 
October 21, 2016.
4. EPA (2016). TSCA CDR Fact Sheet: Reporting Manufactured Chemical 
Substances from Metal Mining and Related Activities, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/cdr_fact_sheet_metal_mining_5may2016.pdf. Retrieved October 21, 
2016.

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: December 7, 2016.
Jim Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016-30177 Filed 12-14-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices                                                90843

                                               contain the information claimed as CBI                  Vine Climbing Subgroup 13–07F (except                 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh,
                                               must be submitted for inclusion in the                  Fuzzy Kiwifruit); and Tomato Subgroup                 NC 27604. Active Ingredient: Bifenthrin.
                                               public docket. Information so marked                    8–10A. Contact: RD.                                   Product Type: Insecticide. Proposed
                                               will not be disclosed except in                           2. EPA Registration Number: 279–                    Use: Cranberry. Contact: RD.
                                               accordance with procedures set forth in                 3108. Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–                         8. EPA Registration Number: 73049–
                                               40 CFR part 2.                                          OPP–2016–0352. Applicant: FMC                         45. Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                                  2. Tips for preparing your comments.                 Corporation, Agricultural Products                    2016–0659. Applicant: Valent
                                               When preparing and submitting your                      Group, 1735 Market St., Philadelphia,                 BioSciences Corporation, 870
                                               comments, see the commenting tips at                    PA 19103. Active Ingredient: Bifenthrin.              Technology Way, Libertyville, IL 60048.
                                               http://www.epa.gov/dockets/                             Product Type: Insecticide. Proposed                   Active Ingredient:
                                               comments.html.                                          Use: Caneberries (Subgroup 13–07A);                   Aminoethoxyvinylglycine
                                                  3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to               Cranberry; Fruit, Citrus Group 10–10;                 Hydrochloride (AVG). Product Type:
                                               achieve environmental justice, the fair                 Low Growing Berries (Subgroup 13–                     Plant Growth Regulator (PGR). Proposed
                                               treatment and meaningful involvement                    07G) except Cranberry; Nut, Tree Group                Use: Blueberries at flowering. Contact:
                                               of any group, including minority and/or                 14–12; Peach Subgroup 12–12B; Pepper/                 BPPD.
                                               low-income populations, in the                          Eggplant (Subgroup 8–10B); Pome Fruit                   9. EPA Registration Number: 73049–
                                               development, implementation, and                        Group 11–10 (except Mayhaw);                          58. Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                               enforcement of environmental laws,                      Pomegranate; Small Fruit Vine Climbing                2016–0659. Applicant: Valent
                                               regulations, and policies. To help                      except Fuzzy Kiwifruit (Subgroup 13–                  BioSciences Corporation, 870
                                               address potential environmental justice                 07F); and Tomato (Subgroup 8–10A).                    Technology Way, Libertyville, IL 60048.
                                               issues, EPA seeks information on any                    Contact: RD.                                          Active Ingredient:
                                               groups or segments of the population                      3. EPA Registration Number: 279–                    Aminoethoxyvinylglycine
                                               who, as a result of their location,                     3313. Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–                       Hydrochloride (AVG). Product Type:
                                               cultural practices, or other factors, may               OPP–2016–0352. Applicant: FMC                         Plant Growth Regulator (PGR). Proposed
                                               have atypical or disproportionately high                Corporation, Agricultural Products                    Use: Muskmelon seed production and
                                               and adverse human health impacts or                     Group, 1735 Market St., Philadelphia,                 olive trees at flowering. Contact: BPPD.
                                               environmental effects from exposure to                  PA 19103. Active Ingredient: Bifenthrin.                10. EPA Registration Numbers:
                                               the pesticides discussed in this                        Product Type: Insecticide. Proposed                   80289–1, 80289–7, 80289–8, 80289–18,
                                               document, compared to the general                       Use: Brassica, Leafy Greens Subgroup 4–               80289–20, and 80289–21. Docket ID
                                               population.                                             16B; Caneberries (Subgroup 13–07A);                   Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0573.
                                                                                                       Fruit, Citrus Group 10–10; Nut, Tree                  Applicant: Isagro S.p.A. d/b/a Isagro
                                               II. Registration Applications
                                                                                                       Group 14–12; Peach Subgroup 12–12B;                   USA, Inc., 430 Davis Dr., Suite 240,
                                                  EPA has received applications to                     Pepper/Eggplant (Subgroup 8–10B);                     Morrisville, NC 27560. Active
                                               register new uses for pesticide products                Pome Fruit Group 11–10 (except                        Ingredient: Tetraconazole. Product
                                               containing currently registered active                  Mayhaw); Pomegranate; Small Fruit                     Type: Fungicide. Proposed Use: Dried
                                               ingredients. Pursuant to the provisions                 Vine Climbing except Fuzzy Kiwifruit
                                               of FIFRA section 3(c)(4) (7 U.S.C.                                                                            Shelled Pea and Bean (except Soybean)
                                                                                                       (Subgroup 13–07F); and Tomato                         (Crop Subgroup 6C), Barley, Rapeseed
                                               136a(c)(4)), EPA is hereby providing                    (Subgroup 8–10A). Contact: RD.
                                               notice of receipt and opportunity to                                                                          (Crop Subgroup 20A), and Wheat.
                                                                                                         4. EPA Registration Numbers: 279–                   Contact: RD.
                                               comment on these applications. Notice                   3315 and 279–3329. Docket ID Number:
                                               of receipt of these applications does not               EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0352. Applicant:                        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
                                               imply a decision by EPA on these                        FMC Corporation, Agricultural Products                  Dated: December 2, 2016.
                                               applications. For actions being                         Group, 1735 Market St., Philadelphia,                 Rob McNally,
                                               evaluated under EPA’s public                            PA 19103. Active Ingredient: Bifenthrin,              Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
                                               participation process for registration                  zeta-Cypermethrin. Product Type:                      Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
                                               actions, there will be an additional                    Insecticide. Proposed Use: Avocado.                   Programs.
                                               opportunity for public comment on the                   Contact: RD.                                          [FR Doc. 2016–30178 Filed 12–14–16; 8:45 am]
                                               proposed decisions. Please see EPA’s                      5. EPA Registration Number: 11678–                  BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                               public participation Web site for                       66. Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                               additional information on this process                  2016–0352. Applicant: ADAMA
                                               (http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-                         Makhteshim, 3120 Highwoods Blvd.,                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                               registration/public-participation-                      Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27604. Active                  AGENCY
                                               process-registration-actions). EPA                      Ingredient: Bifenthrin. Product Type:
                                               received the following applications to                  Insecticide. Proposed Use: Cranberry.                 [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0597; FRL–9954–68]
                                               register new uses for pesticide products                Contact: RD.                                          Chemical Data Reporting;
                                               containing currently registered active                    6. EPA File Symbol: 46597–U. Docket
                                                                                                                                                             Requirements for Inorganic Byproduct
                                               ingredients:                                            ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0605.
                                                  1. EPA Registration Number: 279–                                                                           Chemical Substances; Notice of Intent
                                                                                                       Applicant: Chemstar Corp., 120
                                               3055. Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–                                                                               To Negotiate
                                                                                                       Interstate West Parkway, Suite 100,
                                               OPP–2016–0352. Applicant: FMC                           Lithia Springs, GA 30122. Active                      AGENCY: Environmental Protection
                                               Corporation, Agricultural Products                      Ingredient: Hypochlorous Acid. Product                Agency (EPA).
                                               Group, 1735 Market St., Philadelphia,                   Type: Antimicrobial. Proposed Use:                    ACTION: Notice of Intent to Establish
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                               PA 19103. Active Ingredient: Bifenthrin.                End-use product for antimicrobial fruit               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee and
                                               Product Type: Insecticide. Proposed                     and vegetable wash. Contact: AD.                      Negotiate a Proposed Rule.
                                               Use: Avocado; Low Growing Berry                           7. EPA Registration Numbers: 66222–
                                               Subgroup 13–07G; Peach Subgroup 12–                     99, 66222–236, and 66222–261. Docket                  SUMMARY:  EPA is giving notice that it
                                               12B; Pepper/Eggplant Subgroup 8–10B;                    ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0352.                      intends to establish a Negotiated
                                               Pome Fruit Group 11–10 (except                          Applicant: Makhteshim Agan of North                   Rulemaking Committee under the
                                               Mayhaw); Pomegranate; Small Fruit                       America, Inc. (d/b/a ADAMA), 3120                     Federal Advisory Committee Act


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:19 Dec 14, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00072   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM   15DEN1


                                               90844                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices

                                               (FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            Committee. The objective of this
                                               Act (NRA). The objective of the                                                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will
                                                                                                       I. General Information
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will                                                                          be to develop a proposed rule providing
                                               be to negotiate a proposed rule that                    A. Does this action apply to me?                      for limiting chemical data reporting
                                               would limit chemical data reporting                        You may be potentially affected by                 requirements, under TSCA section 8(a),
                                               requirements under section 8(a) of the                  this action if you manufacture                        for manufacturers of any inorganic
                                               Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA),                    (including manufacture as a byproduct                 byproduct chemical substances, when
                                               as amended by the Frank. R. Lautenberg                  chemical substance) or import chemical                such byproduct chemical substances are
                                               Chemical Safety for the 21st Century                    substances listed on the TSCA                         subsequently recycled, reused, or
                                               Act, for manufacturers of any inorganic                 Inventory. The following list of North                reprocessed. This negotiation process,
                                               byproduct chemical substances, when                     American Industrial Classification                    which includes the establishment of a
                                               such byproduct chemical substances are                  System (NAICS) codes are not intended                 federal advisory committee, is required
                                               subsequently recycled, reused, or                       to be exhaustive, but rather provides a               by section 8(a)(6) of the Toxic
                                               reprocessed. The purpose of the                         guide to help readers determine whether               Substances Control Act (TSCA), as
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will                    this action may apply to them:                        amended by the Frank. R. Lautenberg
                                               be to conduct discussions in a good                        • Chemical manufacturers and                       Chemical Safety for the 21st Century
                                               faith attempt to reach consensus on                     importers (NAICS codes 325 and                        Act (‘‘Lautenberg Act’’).
                                               proposed regulatory language. This                      324110; e.g., chemical manufacturing                  B. What is the Agency’s authority for
                                               negotiation process is required by                      and processing and petroleum                          this action?
                                               section 8(a)(6) of TSCA. The Negotiated                 refineries).
                                               Rulemaking Committee will consist of                       • Chemical users and processors who                  This notice announcing EPA’s intent
                                               representatives of parties with a                       may manufacture a byproduct chemical                  to establish a Negotiated Rulemaking
                                               definable stake in the outcome of the                   substance (NAICS codes 22, 322, 331,                  Committee to negotiate a proposed
                                               proposed requirements.                                  and 3344; e.g., utilities, paper                      regulation was developed under the
                                               DATES: Comments must be received on                     manufacturing, primary metal                          authority of sections 563 and 564 of the
                                               or before January 17, 2017.                             manufacturing, and semiconductor and                  Negotiated Rulemaking Act (NRA) (5
                                               ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,                        other electronic component                            U.S.C. 561, Pub. L. 104–320). This
                                               identified by docket identification (ID)                manufacturing).                                       Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will
                                               number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0597, by                           If you have any questions regarding                be a statutory committee under the
                                               one of the following methods:                           the applicability of this action to a                 Federal Advisory Committee Act
                                                  • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://                particular entity, consult the technical              (FACA) (5 U.S.C. App. 2, section
                                               www.regulations.gov. Follow the online                  person listed under FOR FURTHER                       9(a)(1)). Any proposed regulation
                                               instructions for submitting comments.                   INFORMATION CONTACT.                                  resulting from the negotiation process
                                               Do not submit electronically any                                                                              would be developed under the authority
                                                                                                       B. What should I consider as I prepare                of TSCA section 8 (15 U.S.C. 2607), as
                                               information you consider to be                          my comments for EPA?
                                               Confidential Business Information (CBI)                                                                       amended by the Lautenberg Act (Pub. L.
                                               or other information whose disclosure is                   1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this              114–182).
                                               restricted by statute.                                  information to EPA through http://                    III. Negotiated Rulemaking
                                                  • Mail: Document Control Office                      www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
                                               (7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention                 mark the part or all of the information               A. Why is the Agency pursuing a
                                               and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental                        that you claim to be CBI. For CBI                     negotiated rulemaking?
                                               Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania                    information in a disk or CD–ROM that                     In the Lautenberg Act, Congress
                                               Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.                    you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the              mandated that EPA undertake a
                                                  • Hand Delivery: To make special                     disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then                        negotiation process, pursuant to the
                                               arrangements for hand delivery or                       identify electronically within the disk or            NRA, aimed at developing a rule to limit
                                               delivery of boxed information, please                   CD–ROM the specific information that                  TSCA section 8(a) chemical data
                                               follow the instructions at http://                      is claimed as CBI. In addition to one                 reporting requirements for
                                               www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.                      complete version of the comment that                  manufacturers of any inorganic
                                                  Additional instructions on                           includes information claimed as CBI, a                byproduct chemical substances, when
                                               commenting or visiting the docket,                      copy of the comment that does not                     such byproduct chemical substances are
                                               along with more information about                       contain the information claimed as CBI                subsequently recycled, reused, or
                                               dockets generally, is available at http://              must be submitted for inclusion in the                reprocessed.
                                               www.epa.gov/dockets.                                    public docket. Information so marked                     EPA sees potential benefits from
                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For                    will not be disclosed except in                       undertaking this negotiated rulemaking
                                               technical information contact: Susan                    accordance with procedures set forth in               process. A regulatory negotiation
                                               Sharkey, Chemical Control Division                      40 CFR part 2.                                        process will allow EPA to engage
                                               (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention                    2. Tips for preparing your comments.               directly with informed, interested, and
                                               and Toxics, Environmental Protection                    When preparing and submitting your                    affected parties, all of whom are
                                               Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,                     comments, see the commenting tips at                  working together to resolve their
                                               Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone                    http://www.epa.gov/dockets/                           differences. Because a negotiating
                                               number: (202) 564–8789; email address:                  comments.html.                                        committee includes representatives
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                               Sharkey.susan@epa.gov.                                  II. Background                                        from the major stakeholder groups
                                                  For general information contact: The                                                                       affected by or interested in the rule, the
                                               TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422                        A. What action is the Agency taking?                  number of public comments on any
                                               South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY                         As required by the Negotiated                       proposed rule may be reduced and those
                                               14620; telephone number: (202) 554–                     Rulemaking Act of 1996 (NRA), EPA is                  comments that are received may be
                                               1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@                      giving notice that the Agency intends to              more moderate. EPA anticipates that
                                               epa.gov.                                                establish a Negotiated Rulemaking                     few substantive changes would be


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:19 Dec 14, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00073   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM   15DEN1


                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices                                           90845

                                               needed to any proposed rule resulting                   allows for a public comment period. All               previously stated positions on issues
                                               from the negotiated rulemaking process.                 participants and interested parties                   involved in this rulemaking effort.
                                               Finally, EPA recognizes an observation                  would retain their rights to comment
                                                                                                                                                             IV. Chemical Data Reporting for
                                               of the Administrative Conference of the                 and to seek judicial review. EPA
                                                                                                                                                             Inorganic Byproduct Chemical
                                               United States: ‘‘Experience indicates                   anticipates, however, that any
                                                                                                                                                             Substances
                                               that if the parties in interest were to                 preproposal consensus agreed upon by
                                               work together to negotiate the text of a                this Negotiated Rulemaking Committee                  A. Chemical Data Reporting (CDR)
                                               proposed rule, they might be able in                    would effectively address all major                   Framework
                                               some circumstances to identify the                      issues prior to publication of a proposed               Under TSCA, EPA regulates the
                                               major issues, gauge their importance to                 rulemaking.                                           manufacture, processing, distribution,
                                               the respective parties, identify the                                                                          use, and disposal of chemical
                                               information and data necessary to                       C. What is the Agency commitment?
                                                                                                                                                             substances in the United States. The
                                               resolve the issues, and develop a rule                     In initiating this regulatory                      TSCA Inventory of Chemical Substances
                                               that is acceptable to the respective                    negotiation process, EPA is making a                  (TSCA Inventory) lists the chemical
                                               interests, all within the contours of the               commitment to provide adequate                        substances which are manufactured or
                                               substantive statute.’’ ACUS                             resources to ensure timely and                        processed in the United States (also
                                               Recommendation 82–4.                                    successful completion of the process.                 called ‘‘existing chemical substances’’).
                                               B. What is the concept of negotiated                    This commitment includes making the                   Chemical substances not on the TSCA
                                               rulemaking?                                             process a priority activity for all                   Inventory are known as ‘‘new chemical
                                                                                                       representatives, components, officials,               substances’’ and are required to be
                                                  Negotiated rulemaking is a process in
                                                                                                       and personnel of the Agency who need                  reviewed through EPA’s new chemical
                                               which a proposed rule is developed by
                                                                                                       to be involved in the rulemaking, from                program (under TSCA section 5) prior to
                                               a committee composed of
                                                                                                       the time of initiation until such time as             the commencement of manufacture or
                                               representatives of all those interests that
                                                                                                       a final rule is issued or the process is              processing. There are over 85,000
                                               will be significantly affected by the rule.
                                                                                                       expressly terminated. EPA will provide                chemical substances listed on the TSCA
                                               Decisions are made by consensus,
                                                                                                       administrative support for the process                Inventory.
                                               which the NRA defines as the
                                                                                                       and will take steps to ensure that the                  In 1986, EPA created the Inventory
                                               unanimous concurrence among interests
                                                                                                       Negotiated Rulemaking Committee has                   Update Reporting (IUR) regulation
                                               represented on a Negotiated Rulemaking
                                               Committee, unless the Negotiated                        the dedicated resources it requires to                under TSCA section 8 to collect, every
                                               Rulemaking Committee itself                             complete its work in a timely fashion.                four years, limited information on the
                                               unanimously agrees to use a different                   These include the provision or                        manufacture (which includes import) of
                                               definition. To start the process, the                   procurement of such support services                  organic chemical substances listed on
                                               Agency identifies all interests                         as: Properly equipped space adequate                  the TSCA Inventory, thereby providing
                                               potentially affected by the rulemaking                  for public meetings and caucuses;                     more up-to-date production volume
                                               under consideration. To help in this                    logistical support; distribution of                   information on the chemical substances
                                               identification process, the Agency                      background information; the service of a              in U.S. commerce. In 2005, EPA
                                               publishes a notice in the Federal                       facilitator; and such additional research             amended the IUR to require the
                                               Register, such as this one, which                       and other technical assistance as may be              reporting of information on inorganic
                                               identifies a preliminary list of interests              necessary. If there is consensus within               chemical substances and to collect
                                               and requests public comment on that                     the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee,                  additional manufacturing, processing,
                                               list. Following receipt of the comments,                EPA will use the consensus to the                     and use information. EPA has since
                                               the Agency establishes a committee                      maximum extent possible, consistent                   made additional changes to the
                                               representing these various interests to                 with the legal obligations of the Agency,             reporting requirements, and in 2011
                                               negotiate a consensus on the terms of a                 as the basis for a rule proposed by the               changed the name of the reporting rule
                                               proposed rule. Representation on the                    Agency for public notice and comment.                 to Chemical Data Reporting. CDR
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee may                     The Agency is committed to working in                 regulations are currently codified at 40
                                               be direct, that is, each member                         good faith to seek consensus on a                     CFR part 711. EPA believes CDR is the
                                               represents a specific interest, or may be               proposal that is consistent with the legal            only current reporting obligation under
                                               indirect, through coalitions of parties                 mandate of TSCA.                                      TSCA section 8(a) that is likely to affect
                                               formed for this purpose. The Agency is                  D. What is the negotiating consensus?                 the manufacturers of inorganic
                                               a member of the Negotiated Rulemaking                                                                         byproduct chemical substances.
                                               Committee representing the Federal                        A key principle of negotiated                       Information collected under CDR is
                                               government’s own set of interests. The                  rulemaking is that agreement is by                    used to support Agency programs,
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee is                      consensus of all the interests. Thus, no              providing exposure-related data for
                                               facilitated by a trained mediator, who                  one interest or group of interests is able            chemical substances subject to TSCA in
                                               facilitates the negotiation process. The                to control the process. Again, the NRA                U.S. commerce. This information is also
                                               role of this mediator, or facilitator, is to            defines consensus as the unanimous                    made publicly available, to the extent
                                               apply proven consensus building                         concurrence among interests                           possible while continuing to protect
                                               techniques to the advisory committee                    represented on a Negotiated Rulemaking                submitted information claimed as
                                               setting.                                                Committee, unless the Negotiated                      confidential business information.
                                                  If a regulatory negotiation advisory                 Rulemaking Committee itself                             Manufacturers of inorganic chemical
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                               committee reaches consensus on the                      unanimously agrees to use a different                 substances first reported under the IUR
                                               provisions of a proposed rule, the                      definition. In addition, experience has               in 2006. They also reported under the
                                               Agency, consistent with its legal                       demonstrated that using a trained                     CDR in 2012 and 2016. Specific
                                               obligations, would use such consensus                   mediator to facilitate this process will              reporting requirements for these
                                               as the basis of a proposed rule, to be                  assist all potential parties, including               manufacturers were phased in, to allow
                                               published in the Federal Register. This                 EPA, to identify their interests in the               for the industry to better understand the
                                               provides the required public notice and                 rule and so to be able to reevaluate                  reporting requirements and for EPA to


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:19 Dec 14, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00074   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM   15DEN1


                                               90846                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices

                                               gain a better understanding of the                      Instructions for the 2016 TSCA CDR                    comment on a proposal would likely be
                                               industry. In recent years, the regulatory               (Ref. 1); CDR Byproduct and Recycling                 simplified if that proposal is itself the
                                               requirement to report byproduct                         Scenarios (Ref. 2); TSCA CDR Fact Sheet               result of a previously negotiated
                                               chemical substances (and the                            for the Printed Circuit Board Industry                consensus. For the reasons described
                                               availability of exemptions from that                    (Ref. 3); and TSCA CDR Fact Sheet for                 above, if consensus cannot be reached,
                                               requirement) has been a frequent topic                  Reporting Manufactured Chemical                       and there is no agreement upon which
                                               of discussion.                                          Substances from Metal Mining and                      to base a proposal, then there is no
                                                                                                       Related Activities (Ref. 4).                          further statutory obligation to issue a
                                               B. Inorganic Byproduct Chemical                            On June 22, 2016, TSCA was
                                               Substances Under CDR                                                                                          proposal or a final rule.
                                                                                                       amended by the Lautenberg Act. TSCA
                                                 A byproduct chemical substance is a                   now includes a requirement that EPA                   V. Proposed Negotiating Procedures
                                               chemical substance produced without a                   enter into a negotiated rulemaking,                   A. Interests Involved
                                               separate commercial intent during the                   pursuant to the NRA, to develop and
                                               manufacture, processing, use, or                        publish a proposed rule to limit the                    Section 562 of the NRA defines the
                                               disposal of another chemical substance                  reporting requirements under TSCA                     term ‘‘interest’’ as one of ‘‘multiple
                                               or mixture. Such byproduct chemical                     section 8(a), for manufacturers of any                parties which have a similar point of
                                               substances may, or may not, in                          inorganic byproduct chemical                          view or which are likely to be affected
                                               themselves have commercial value.                       substances, when such byproduct                       in a similar manner.’’ We anticipate that
                                               They are nonetheless produced for the                   chemical substances, whether by the                   the following key interests are likely to
                                               purpose of obtaining a commercial                       byproduct chemical substance                          be significantly affected by the rule to be
                                               advantage. Because byproduct chemical                   manufacturer or by any other person,                  addressed by the Negotiated
                                               substances are manufactured for a                       are subsequently recycled, reused, or                 Rulemaking Committee while
                                               commercial purpose, such                                reprocessed. The objective of the                     negotiating how to limit CDR
                                               manufacturing is reportable under CDR                   negotiated rulemaking process is to                   requirements for manufacturers of any
                                               unless covered by a specific reporting                  develop and publish a proposed rule by                inorganic byproduct chemical
                                               exemption. CDR contains a specific                      June 22, 2019. In the event a proposed                substances, when such byproduct
                                               reporting exemption for the                             rule is developed through the negotiated              chemical substances are subsequently
                                               manufacture of byproduct chemical                       rulemaking process, a final rule                      recycled, reused, or reprocessed:
                                               substances, limited to cases where those                ‘‘resulting from such negotiated                        D Inorganic chemical manufacturers
                                               byproduct chemical substances are not                   rulemaking’’ must be issued by                        and processors, including metal mining
                                               used for any commercial purposes (or                    December 22, 2019. 15 U.S.C.                          and related activities;
                                               are only used for certain limited                       2607(a)(6).                                             D Recyclers, including scrap
                                               commercial purposes) after they are                        EPA construes its obligation to                    recyclers;
                                               manufactured. 40 CFR 711.10(c).                         propose and finalize a rule under TSCA                  D Industry advocacy groups;
                                               Inorganic byproduct chemical                            section 8(a)(6) as being contingent on                  D Environmental advocacy groups;
                                               substances are often recycled. The                      the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee                     D Federal, State, or Tribal
                                               recycling of a byproduct chemical                       reaching a consensus. EPA’s                           governments; and
                                               substance may qualify as a commercial                   interpretation is based on several                      D Employee advocacy groups, such as
                                               purpose beyond the limited commercial                   factors. First, TSCA section 8(a)(6)(A)               labor unions.
                                               purposes encompassed by 40 CFR                          does not give any direction on how CDR                B. Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
                                               711.10(c). If so, then the CDR exemption                reporting requirements for the specified              Formation
                                               for the manufacturer of a byproduct                     byproduct chemical substance
                                               chemical substance is unavailable.                      manufacturers should be limited, other                  The Negotiated Rulemaking
                                                 Beginning in 2006, EPA became aware                   than directing that the particular                    Committee will be formed and operated
                                               of a variety of questions raised by the                 limitations should be negotiated.                     in full compliance with the
                                               manufacturers of inorganic byproduct                    Second, EPA’s obligation to finalize a                requirements of FACA in a manner
                                               chemical substances about their                         rule under TSCA section 8(a)(6)(B)                    consistent with the requirements of the
                                               obligations to report their manufacture                 presupposes that such rule would be                   NRA.
                                               of those byproduct chemical substances.                 one ‘‘resulting from such negotiated                  C. Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
                                               EPA has since provided detailed                         rulemaking.’’ While EPA would have                    Membership
                                               guidance to address a variety of                        authority to issue an amendment to the
                                               questions that have been raised. See 75                 CDR even if negotiation failed to                        The Agency intends to conduct the
                                               FR 49675–6 (2010); 76 FR 50832–3,                       achieve a consensus, such a rule would                negotiated rulemaking proceedings with
                                               50849–50851 (2011). In 2011, EPA also                   not be a rule resulting from the                      particular attention to ensuring full and
                                               stated that it would examine CDR                        negotiated rulemaking. Accordingly,                   adequate representation of those
                                               information related to byproduct                        TSCA section 8(a)(6)(B) presupposes                   interests that may be significantly
                                               chemical substances to identify whether                 that the negotiated rulemaking process                affected by a rule providing for limiting
                                               there are segments of byproduct                         reached a consensus in directing EPA to               CDR requirements for inorganic
                                               chemical substance manufacturing for                    issue a final rule. If the obligation to              byproduct chemical substances. We
                                               which EPA can determine that there is                   issue a final rule is so contingent, then             have listed those interests likely to be
                                               no need for the CDR information to                      it stands to reason that the prior                    significantly affected by a rule in Unit
                                               continue to be collected, either for 2016               obligation to issue a proposal is                     V.A., and the following list identifies
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                               or for future reporting cycles. 76 FR                   similarly contingent. Third, the time                 the parties that the Agency has initially
                                               50832–3 (2011). EPA did not amend the                   allotted for issuing a final rule (i.e., six          identified as representing interests
                                               CDR requirements for the 2016 reporting                 months) is relatively short, consistent               likely to be significantly affected by a
                                               cycle. Documents providing information                  with a presupposition that the proposal               rule:
                                               to assist inorganic byproduct chemical                  in question would be the product of a                 • Aluminum Association
                                               substance manufacturers with reporting                  successful negotiation. As noted in Unit              • American Chemistry Council
                                               under CDR requirements include:                         III., the process of responding to                    • American Coal Ash Association


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:19 Dec 14, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00075   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM   15DEN1


                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices                                            90847

                                               • Environmental Defense Fund                            that may be significantly affected by any             summaries of the technical literature or
                                               • Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries               rule resulting from the negotiation, are              comments on particular matters such as
                                               • IPC—Association Connecting                            represented.                                          economic issues) so as to facilitate
                                                  Electronics Industries                                  This document affords potential                    Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
                                               • North American Metals Council                         participants the opportunity to request               deliberations. They also might assist in
                                               • National Mining Association                           representation in the negotiations.                   estimating costs and drafting regulatory
                                               • U.S. Environmental Protection                         Request such representation by                        text on issues associated with the
                                                  Agency                                               submitting a comment as described                     analysis of the affordability and benefits
                                               • Utility Solid Waste Activities Group                  under ADDRESSES in this notice.                       addressed, and formulating drafts of the
                                                  The listed parties have been                            Section 565(b) of the NRA requires                 various provisions and their
                                               preliminarily identified by EPA as being                the Agency to limit membership on a                   justification previously developed by
                                               either a potential member of the                        Negotiated Rulemaking Committee to 25                 the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee.
                                                                                                       members, unless the Agency determines                 Given their staffing function,
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, or a
                                                                                                       that more members are necessary in                    workgroups usually consist of
                                               potential member of a coalition that
                                                                                                       order for the Negotiated Rulemaking                   participants who have expertise or
                                               would in turn nominate a candidate to
                                                                                                       Committee to function or to achieve                   particular interest in the technical
                                               represent one of the significantly
                                                                                                       balanced membership. The Agency                       matter(s) being studied. Because it
                                               affected interests listed in Unit V.A.
                                                                                                       believes that the negotiating group                   recognizes the importance of this
                                               This list is not presented as a complete
                                                                                                       should not exceed 25 members, which                   staffing work for the Negotiated
                                               or exclusive list from which Negotiated
                                                                                                       would make it difficult to conduct                    Rulemaking Committee, EPA will
                                               Rulemaking Committee members will be
                                                                                                       effective negotiations. EPA is aware that             provide appropriate administrative and
                                               selected, nor does inclusion on the list
                                                                                                       there are many more than 25 potential                 technical expertise for such workgroups.
                                               mean that a party on the list has agreed                participants to consider for the                        EPA requests comment regarding
                                               to participate as a member of the                       Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. The                  particular appointments to membership
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee or as                   Agency does not believe, nor does the                 on the Negotiated Rulemaking
                                               a member of a coalition. This list merely               NRA contemplate, that each                            Committee. Members can be individuals
                                               indicates those parties that represent                  significantly affected interest must                  or organizations. If the effort is to be
                                               interests that EPA has tentatively                      participate directly in the negotiations;             successful, participants should be able
                                               identified as being significantly affected              however, each significantly affected                  to fully and adequately represent the
                                               by a rule providing for limiting CDR                    interest can be adequately represented.               viewpoints of their respective interests.
                                               requirements for inorganic byproduct                    To have a successful negotiation, it is               Those who wish to be appointed as
                                               chemical substances.                                    important for significantly affected                  members of the Negotiated Rulemaking
                                                  EPA anticipates that the Negotiated                  interests to identify and form coalitions             Committee should submit a request to
                                               Rulemaking Committee will be                            that adequately represent those                       EPA by submitting a comment as
                                               comprised of approximately 10–25                        interests. These coalitions, to provide               described under ADDRESSES in this
                                               members representing significantly                      adequate representation, must agree to                notice. The list of potential Negotiated
                                               affected interests. The EPA                             support, both financially and                         Rulemaking Committee members
                                               Administrator will select members                       technically, a member to the Negotiated               provided earlier in this document
                                               carefully to ensure that there is a                     Rulemaking Committee whom they will                   includes those who have been initially
                                               balanced representation of such                         choose to represent their interest. The               identified by EPA as being either a
                                               interests on the Negotiated Rulemaking                  Agency believes it is very important to               potential member of the Negotiated
                                               Committee. EPA anticipates that the                     recognize that interested parties who are             Rulemaking Committee, or a potential
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee will                    not selected to membership on the                     member of a coalition that would in
                                               contain representatives from industry,                  Negotiated Rulemaking Committee can                   turn nominate a candidate to represent
                                               environmental groups, and state, local,                 still make valuable contributions to this             one of the significantly affected interests
                                               and tribal governments.                                 negotiated rulemaking effort in any of                on the Negotiated Rulemaking
                                                  One purpose of this document is to                   several ways:                                         Committee.
                                               determine whether the negotiated                           • The party could request to be                      EPA values and welcomes diversity.
                                               rulemaking will significantly affect                    placed on the Negotiated Rulemaking                   In an effort to obtain nominations of
                                               interests that are not listed in Unit V.A.,             Committee mailing list, submitting                    diverse candidates, EPA encourages
                                               as well as whether the list of parties the              written comments, as appropriate;                     nominations of women and men of all
                                               Agency has listed identifies accurately                    • The party could attend the                       racial and ethnic groups.
                                               and comprehensively a group of                          Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
                                               stakeholders representing the                                                                                 D. Good Faith Negotiation
                                                                                                       meetings, which are open to the public,
                                               significantly affected interests listed in              caucus with his or her interest’s member                 Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
                                               Unit V.A. EPA requests comment and                      on the Negotiated Rulemaking                          members should be willing to negotiate
                                               suggestions on the list of significantly                Committee, or even address the                        in good faith and have the authority,
                                               affected interests, as well as the list of              Negotiated Rulemaking Committee                       from her or his constituency, to do so.
                                               proposed representatives of those                       (usually allowed at the end of an issue’s             The first step is to ensure that each
                                               interests. EPA recognizes that any                      discussion or the end of the session, as              member has good communications with
                                               regulatory actions it takes under this                  time permits); or                                     her or his constituencies. An intra-
                                               program may at times affect various                        • The party could assist a workgroup               interest network of communication
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                               segments of society in different ways,                  that might be established by the                      should be established to bring
                                               and that this may in some cases produce                 Negotiated Rulemaking Committee.                      information from the support
                                               unique interests in a rule based on                        An advisory committee may convene                  organization to the member at the table,
                                               demographic factors. Particular                         informal workgroups to assist the                     and to take information from the table
                                               attention will be given by the Agency to                Negotiated Rulemaking Committee in                    back to the support organization.
                                               ensure that any unique interests that                   ‘‘staffing’’ various discrete and technical           Second, each organization or coalition
                                               have been identified in this regard, and                matters (e.g., researching or preparing               should, therefore, designate as its


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:19 Dec 14, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00076   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM   15DEN1


                                               90848                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices

                                               representative an official with                         VI. Comments Requested                                to revise/modify its EPA Administered
                                               credibility and authority to insure that                  EPA requests comment on the extent                  Permit Programs: The National Pollutant
                                               needed information is provided and                      to which the issues, interests,                       Discharge Elimination System EPA-
                                               decisions are made in a timely fashion.                 Negotiated Rulemaking Committee                       authorized program to allow electronic
                                                  Negotiated rulemaking efforts can                    representatives, and procedures                       reporting.
                                               require a very significant contribution of              described in this document are adequate               DATES: EPA’s approval is effective
                                               time by the appointed members. The                      and appropriate.                                      December 15, 2016.
                                               convening meeting of the Negotiated                                                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                       VII. References                                       Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental
                                               Rulemaking Committee is expected to
                                               be held in March 2017, and the work of                     The following is a listing of the                  Protection Agency, Office of
                                                                                                       documents that are specifically                       Environmental Information, Mail Stop
                                               the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
                                                                                                       referenced in this document. The docket               2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
                                               is expected to conclude approximately
                                                                                                       includes these documents and other                    Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175,
                                               in September 2017.
                                                                                                       information considered by EPA,                        seeh.karen@epa.gov.
                                                  Other qualities that can be very                     including documents referenced within                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
                                               helpful are negotiating experience and                  the documents that are included in the                October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
                                               skills, as well as sufficient technical                 docket, even if the referenced document               Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR)
                                               knowledge to participate in substantive                 is not physically located in the docket.              was published in the Federal Register
                                               negotiations. Certain concepts are                      For assistance in locating these other                (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of
                                               central to negotiating in good faith. One               documents, please consult the technical               title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR
                                               is the willingness to bring key issues to               person listed under FOR FURTHER                       establishes electronic reporting as an
                                               the bargaining table in an attempt to                   INFORMATION CONTACT.                                  acceptable regulatory alternative to
                                               reach a consensus, instead of keeping                   1. EPA (2016). Instructions for Reporting             paper reporting and establishes
                                               issues in reserve. The second is a                          2016 TSCA CDR, https://www.epa.gov/               requirements to assure that electronic
                                               willingness to keep the issues at the                       sites/production/files/2016-05/
                                                                                                                                                             documents are as legally dependable as
                                               table and not take them to other forums.                    documents/instructions_for_reporting_
                                                                                                           2016_tsca_cdr_13may2016.pdf.                      their paper counterparts. Subpart D of
                                               Finally, good faith includes a                              Retrieved October 21, 2016.                       CROMERR requires that state, tribal or
                                               willingness to move away from the type                  2. EPA (2012). CDR Byproduct and Recycling            local government agencies that receive,
                                               of positions usually taken in a more                        Scenarios, https://www.epa.gov/sites/             or wish to begin receiving, electronic
                                               traditional rulemaking process, and                         production/files/documents/2012_cdr_              reports under their EPA-authorized
                                               instead explore openly with other                           byproducts_scenaros_0.pdf. Retrieved              programs must apply to EPA for a
                                               parties all ideas that may emerge from                      October 21, 2016.                                 revision or modification of those
                                                                                                       3. EPA (2016). TSCA CDR Fact Sheet:
                                               the discussions of the Negotiated                           Byproducts Reporting for the Printed              programs and obtain EPA approval.
                                               Rulemaking Committee.                                       Circuit Board Industry, https://                  Subpart D provides standards for such
                                                                                                           www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/               approvals based on consideration of the
                                               E. Facilitator
                                                                                                           2016-02/documents/final_cdr_fact_                 electronic document receiving systems
                                                 The facilitator will not be involved                      sheet_printed_circuit_board_2_22_                 that the state, tribe, or local government
                                                                                                           16.pdf. Retrieved October 21, 2016.               will use to implement the electronic
                                               with the substantive development of                     4. EPA (2016). TSCA CDR Fact Sheet:
                                               any proposed rule. Rather, the                                                                                reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b)
                                                                                                           Reporting Manufactured Chemical
                                               facilitator’s role generally includes                       Substances from Metal Mining and
                                                                                                                                                             through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D
                                               facilitating the meetings of the                            Related Activities, https://www.epa.gov/          provides special procedures for program
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee in an                       sites/production/files/2016-05/                   revisions and modifications to allow
                                               impartial manner and impartially                            documents/cdr_fact_sheet_metal_                   electronic reporting, to be used at the
                                               assisting the members of the Negotiated                     mining_5may2016.pdf. Retrieved                    option of the state, tribe or local
                                                                                                           October 21, 2016.                                 government in place of procedures
                                               Rulemaking Committee in conducting
                                               discussions and negotiations.                             Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.                   available under existing program-
                                                                                                         Dated: December 7, 2016.                            specific authorization regulations. An
                                               F. EPA Representative                                                                                         application submitted under the subpart
                                                                                                       Jim Jones,
                                                                                                                                                             D procedures must show that the state,
                                                  The EPA representative will be a full                Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
                                                                                                       Safety and Pollution Prevention.
                                                                                                                                                             tribe or local government has sufficient
                                               and active participant in the consensus                                                                       legal authority to implement the
                                               building negotiations. The Agency’s                     [FR Doc. 2016–30177 Filed 12–14–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                             electronic reporting components of the
                                               representative will meet regularly with                 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                                                                                                                             programs covered by the application
                                               various senior Agency officials, briefing                                                                     and will use electronic document
                                               them on the negotiations and receiving                                                                        receiving systems that meet the
                                               their suggestions and advice, in order to               ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                                                                       AGENCY                                                applicable subpart D requirements.
                                               effectively represent the Agency’s views                                                                         On November 3, 2016, the Oregon
                                               regarding the issues before the                         [9956–91–OEI]                                         Department of Environmental Quality
                                               Negotiated Rulemaking Committee.                                                                              (OR DEQ) submitted an application
                                               EPA’s representative also will ensure                   Cross-Media Electronic Reporting:                     titled ‘‘National Pollutant Discharge
                                               that the entire spectrum of federal                     Authorized Program Revision                           Elimination System’’ for revision/
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                               governmental interests affected by the                  Approval, State of Oregon                             modification to its EPA-approved
                                               rulemaking, including the Office of                     AGENCY: Environmental Protection                      program under title 40 CFR to allow
                                               Management and Budget (OMB) and                         Agency (EPA).                                         new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed
                                               other Departments and agencies, are                     ACTION: Notice.
                                                                                                                                                             OR DEQ’s request to revise/modify its
                                               kept informed of the negotiations and                                                                         EPA-authorized programs and, based on
                                               encouraged to make their concerns                       SUMMARY:  This notice announces EPA’s                 this review, EPA determined that the
                                               known in a timely fashion.                              approval of the State of Oregon’s request             application met the standards for


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:19 Dec 14, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00077   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM   15DEN1



Document Created: 2016-12-15 01:10:21
Document Modified: 2016-12-15 01:10:21
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of Intent to Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee and Negotiate a Proposed Rule.
DatesComments must be received on or before January 17, 2017.
ContactFor technical information contact: Susan Sharkey, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
FR Citation81 FR 90843 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR