81 FR 90896 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating To Opening and Closing Rotations Under the HOSS System
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 241 (December 15, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 241 (December 15, 2016)
| Page Range | 90896-90903 | |
| FR Document | 2016-30082 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 90896-90903] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-30082] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-79520; File No. SR-CBOE-2016-071] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating To Opening and Closing Rotations Under the HOSS System December 9, 2016. I. Introduction On October 7, 2016, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend its rules relating to the opening of series for trading on the Exchange. The Commission published the proposed rule change for comment in the Federal Register on October 27, 2016.\3\ On November 18, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order provides notice of filing of Amendment No. 1 and approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79133 (October 21, 2016), 81 FR 74828 (October 27, 2016) (``Notice''). \4\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange updated a cross-reference to Rule 6.2B in Rule 6.13. To promote transparency of its proposed amendment, when CBOE filed Amendment No. 1 with the Commission, it also submitted Amendment No. 1 as a comment letter to the file, which the Commission posted on its Web site and placed in the public comment file for SR-CBOE-2016-071 (available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2016-071/cboe2016071.shtml). The Exchange also posted a copy of its Amendment No. 1 on its Web site (http://www.cboe.com/aboutcboe/legal/submittedsecfilings.aspx), when it filed it with the Commission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change CBOE proposes to amend its rules relating to the opening of series for trading on the Exchange. Rule 6.2B describes the process (referred to as ``HOSS'') that the Exchange's Hybrid Trading System (the ``System'') uses to open series on the Exchange each trading day. The Exchange may also use HOSS for closing series or opening [[Page 90897]] series after a trading halt. The Exchange is proposing various changes to reorganize and simplify the rule and to more accurately reflect current System functionality.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74829. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to the Exchange, HOSS generally processes the opening of each series in four stages: \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Pre-Opening Period: During the pre-opening period, the System accepts orders and quotes and disseminates messages that contain information based on resting orders and quotes in the book, which may include the expected opening price (``EOP''), expected opening size (``EOS''), any reason why a series may not open, and imbalance information, including the size and side of an imbalance (collectively, ``expected opening information'' or ``EOIs''). (2) Initiation of the Opening Rotation: The System then initiates the opening rotation procedure and distributes a ``Rotation Notice'' to market participants. (3) Opening Rotation Period: During the opening rotation period, the System matches and executes orders and quotes against each other to establish an opening Exchange best bid and offer (``BBO'') and trade price for each series while continuing to disseminate EOIs. (4) Opening of Trading: The System then opens series for trading, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. According to CBOE, the proposed rule change is designed to more clearly organize Rule 6.2B in this sequential order and makes the additional specific changes discussed in more detail below. Pre-Opening Period Rule 6.2B(a) currently provides that the System accepts orders and quotes, for regular trading hours, for a period of time before the opening of trading in the underlying security or, in the case of index options, prior to 8:30 a.m.,\7\ and for extended trading hours, for a period of time prior to 2:00 a.m.\8\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.2B(a) to provide that, for each trading session, the pre-opening period will begin no later than 15 minutes prior to the expected initiation of an opening rotation and no earlier than 2:00 a.m. for regular trading hours and no earlier than 4:00 p.m. on the previous day for extended trading hours.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ All times set forth in Rule 6.2B are central time. See id. at 74829, n.3. \8\ The precise time periods are determined by the Exchange on a class-by-class basis. See id. at 74829. In addition, since the System begins the pre-opening period at the same time for each class within each type of option (equity, index and exchange-traded products (``ETPs'')), the proposed rule change deletes the provision of the current rule that says the Exchange will determine the time on a class-by-class basis. See id. \9\ The Exchange notes that the pre-opening period currently begins at approximately 6:30 a.m. for regular trading hours and approximately 4:00 p.m. on the previous day for extended trading hours. See id. at 74829, n.4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the proposal, the Exchange generally will not restrict the size or origin code of orders that may be submitted during the pre- opening period. Therefore, the proposed rule change amends Rule 6.2B(a)(i) to add certainty to the rule by deleting the provision that requires the Exchange to designate--on a class-by-class basis--the eligible order size, eligible order type, and eligible order origin code (i.e., public customer orders, non-Market Maker broker-dealer orders, and Market Maker broker-dealer orders) which the System will accept.\10\ Additionally, the proposed rule change clarifies that the System will accept all quotes and all order types during the pre- opening period except for immediate-or-cancel, fill-or-kill, intermarket sweep orders, and Market-Maker trade prevention orders.\11\ The proposed rule change also adds that if an order entered during the pre-opening period for regular trading hours is not eligible for book entry (e.g., minimum volume, not held, and market-if-touched orders), the System will route the order via CBOE's order handling system pursuant to Rule 6.12.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74829. \11\ See id. at 74829-30 for a discussion of these order types, which are defined in Rule 6.53. \12\ See id. at 74830. The Exchange notes that orders not eligible for book entry may only be traded open outcry on the Exchange floor. According to the Exchange, because only electronic trading is permitted during extended trading hours, the System will not accept these orders during the extended hours trading session and therefore, this proposed provision is not applicable during that trading session. See id. at 74830, n.6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change amends Rule 6.2B(a)(ii) in several ways. First, it defines EOIs and specifies the timing of their dissemination. EOIs contain information based on resting orders and quotes in the Book, including the EOP, the EOS, any reason why a series may not open pursuant to paragraph (d) of Rule 6.2B,\13\ and any imbalance information, including the size and side of the imbalance. EOIs will be disseminated to all market participants that have elected to receive them beginning at a time determined by the Exchange, which will be no earlier than three hours prior to the expected initiation of an opening rotation for a series. The System will then disseminate EOI at regular intervals of time, or less frequently if there are no updates since the previously disseminated EOI.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ Proposed paragraph (d) of Rule 6.2B sets forth certain Opening Conditions, which are discussed in greater detail below. \14\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74830. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change further modifies Rule 6.2B(a)(ii) to redefine the terms EOP and EOS and address when that information will be disseminated. Currently, Rule 6.2B(a)(ii) states that the EOP is the price at which the greatest number of orders and quotes in the book are expected to trade and provides that an EOP will only be calculated if (a) there are market orders in the book, or the book is crossed or locked and (b) at least one quote is present. The proposed rule change revises this language to state that the EOP is the price at which any opening trade is expected to execute and adds that the EOS is the size of any expected opening trade. The proposed rule change further states the System will only disseminate EOP and EOS messages: (a) If the width between the highest quote bid and lowest quote offer on the Exchange is no wider than the OEPW range (as defined below), in classes in which the Hybrid Agency Liaison (``HAL'') \15\ is not activated for openings; or (b) if the width between the highest quote bid and lowest quote offer on the Exchange or disseminated by other exchanges is no wider than the OEPW range, in classes in which HAL is activated for openings (``HALO'').\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ HAL provides automated order handling in designated Hybrid classes for electronic orders that are not automatically executed by the System. HAL exposes these orders at the national best bid or offer, and Trading Permit Holders may submit responses to trade with the orders. See Rule 6.14A. \16\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74830, for more detailed discussion of these changes to the pre-opening period. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Rotation Initiation and Notice Rule 6.2B(b) currently provides that, unless unusual circumstances exist, at a randomly selected time within a number of seconds after the opening trade and/or the opening quote is disseminated in the market for the underlying security \17\ (or after 8:30 a.m. for index options) with respect to regular trading hours, or after 2:00 a.m. with respect to extended trading hours, the System initiates the opening rotation [[Page 90898]] procedure and sends a notice (``Rotation Notice'') to market participants.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ The ``market for the underlying security'' is currently the primary listing market, the primary volume market (defined as the market with the most liquidity in that underlying security for the previous two calendar months), or the first market to open the underlying security. Since the Exchange does not designate the primary volume market as the market for the underlying security for any class, the proposed rule change deletes that option. The proposed rule change also changes the term ``market'' to ``exchange'' and clarifies that the Exchange determines on a class- by-class basis which market is the market for the underlying security. See Notice, supra note 3, at 74830, n.10. \18\ See id. at 74830-31. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.2B(b) to provide that the System will initiate the opening rotation procedure and send out a Rotation Notice on a class-by-class basis as follows:For regular trading hours: [cir] With respect to equity and ETP options, after the opening trade or the opening quote is disseminated in the market for the underlying security, or at 8:30 for classes determined by the Exchange (including over-the-counter equity classes); or [cir] with respect to index options, at 8:30 a.m., or at the later of 8:30 a.m. and the time the Exchange receives a disseminated index value for classes determined by the Exchange; and For extended trading hours, at 2:00 a.m.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See id. at 74831 (providing detailed description of the Exchange's changes to initiating the opening rotation). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Rotation Period Rule 6.2B(c) provides that after the Rotation Notice is sent, the System enters into a rotation period, during which the opening price is established for each series. The proposed rule change reorganizes paragraph (c) to more clearly demarcate and further describe (1) when the opening rotation period begins, (2) what happens during the period, (3) the handling of EOIs during the period, and (4) when the period ends.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See proposed Rule 6.2B(c). See also Notice, supra note 3, at 74831. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- During the opening rotation period, the System establishes the opening trade price and the opening BBO by matching and executing resting orders and quotes against each other. The proposed rule change modifies the definition of the opening trade price of a series to be the ``market-clearing'' price, which is the single price at which the largest number of contracts in the book can execute, leaving bids and offers that cannot trade with each other.\21\ The proposed rule change also states that all orders (except complex orders and, in classes in which the Exchange has not activated HALO, all-or-none orders and orders with a stop contingency) and quotes in a series in the book prior to the opening rotation period participate in the opening rotation for a series. The Exchange notes that Contingency Orders that participate in the opening rotation may execute during the opening rotation period only if their contingencies are triggered.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74831. If there are multiple prices at which the same number of contracts would clear, the System will use (a) the price at or nearest to the midpoint of the opening BBO, or the widest offer (bid) point of the OEPW range if the midpoint is higher (lower) than that price point, in classes in which the Exchange has not activated HALO; or (b) the price at or nearest to the midpoint of the range consisting of the higher of the opening NBB and widest bid point of the OEPW range, and the lower of the opening NBO and widest offer point of the OEPW range, in classes in which the Exchange has activated HALO. See id. \22\ See id. at 74831-32. Further, the Exchange notes that the proposed rule change moves the rule provision regarding the priority order of orders and quotes during this matching process from current subparagraph (c)(iv) to proposed subparagraph (c)(i)(C). The System prioritizes orders in the following order: (1) Market orders, (2) limit orders and quotes whose prices are better than the opening price, and (3) resting orders and quotes at the opening price. The proposed rule change also notes contingency orders are prioritized as set forth in Rules 6.45A and 6.45B. See id. at 74832, n.13. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change clarifies that the System will continue to disseminate EOIs (not just the EOP and EOS) during the opening rotation period, which may be disseminated at more frequent intervals closer to the opening.\23\ In addition, the proposed rule change updates the description of the length of the opening rotation period and adds detail to the description of how the System processes series to open following the opening rotation period. Specifically, current subparagraph (c)(ii) states that the System will process the series of a class in a random order and the series will begin opening after a period following the Rotation Notice, which period may not exceed sixty seconds and will be established on a class-by-class basis by the Exchange.\24\ Proposed subparagraph (c)(iii) retains that process, but clarifies that CBOE will determine the length and number of these intervals for all classes.\25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ See id. at 74832. \24\ See id. at 74832. \25\ According to the Exchange, currently, the Exchange has set the period of time that must pass before the System begins processing series to open at two seconds, and the Exchange has set the number of intervals to two and the length of the intervals to one second. As a result, the opening rotation period currently lasts two to four seconds. See Regulatory Circular RG11-072; see also Notice, supra note 3, at 74832 n.14. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Quote and Trade Price In its filing, the Exchange represented that, pursuant to the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') Plan, once a series opens, the System disseminates all quote and trade price information to OPRA, including opening quote and trade price information.\26\ Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to delete text in current paragraph (d) of Rule 6.2B stating that the opening price is determined by series and that CBOE disseminates opening quote and trade information through OPRA because the Exchange already disseminates such information pursuant to the OPRA Plan, and therefore believes that this provision is unnecessarily repetitive.\27\ Despite the deletion of that language from the rule concerning reporting data through OPRA, the Exchange is not proposing a substantive change to reporting this information through OPRA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74832. \27\ See id. at 74832. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Conditions Current Rule 6.2B(e) provides that the System will not open a series if one of a number of specified conditions is met, including the absence of a quote that complies with the bid/ask differential requirements or if the opening price would not be within an acceptable range or would leave a market order imbalance.\28\ The proposed rule change amends these conditions to provide that, in classes in which the Exchange has not activated HALO: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ See id. at 74832. The final provision of current paragraph (e) provides the following: If the first or second condition is present, the senior official in the Control Room may authorize the opening of the affected series where necessary to ensure a fair and orderly market; if the second condition is present, the System will not open the series but will send a notification to market participants indicating the reason; if the third condition is present, a notification will be sent to market participants indicating the size and direction of the market order imbalance. In this case, the System will not open the series until the condition causing the delay is satisfied, and the System will repeat this process until the series is open. The proposed rule change combines the exceptions in current paragraph (e) with the applicable opening conditions in current subparagraphs (e)(i) through (iii) into proposed paragraph (d)(i). See id. at n.16. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) If there are no quotes in the series on the Exchange, the System will not open the series; (2) if the width between the Exchange's best quote bid and best quote offer is wider than an acceptable opening price range (as determined by the Exchange on a class-by-class and premium basis) (the ``Opening Exchange Prescribed Width range'' or ``OEPW range'') \29\ and there are orders or quotes marketable against each other, the System will not open the series. However, if the opening quote width is no wider than the intraday acceptable price range for the series (``IEPW range'') \30\ and there are no orders or quotes marketable against each other, the System will open the series. If the opening quote width is wider than the IEPW range, the System will not open the series. Additionally, according to [[Page 90899]] the Exchange, because all quotes entered by Market-Makers (including quotes entered during the pre-opening period and opening rotation period) must satisfy bid/ask differentials,\31\ the Exchange proposes to delete the reference to bid/ask differential requirements in this provision; --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ Current OEPW settings are set forth in Regulatory Circular RG 13-025. See Notice, supra note 3, at 74832, n.18. \30\ See Rule 6.13(b)(v). \31\ See Rule 8.7(d). The Exchange may set different bid/ask differential requirements for a Market-Maker's opening quotes than for its intraday quotes (which it currently does). The proposed rule change specifies this in Interpretation and Policy .02 regarding Market-Maker quotes, which currently provides that the Exchange may also set a different minimum number of contracts for a Market- Maker's opening quotes. See Notice, supra note 3, at 74833, n.20. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) if the opening trade price would be outside of the OEPW range, the System will not open the series. The Exchange states that the proposed rule change also deletes the language from the current provision regarding sending a notification when this condition is present because notifications are sent when a series does not open for any reason; or (4) if the opening trade would leave a market order imbalance, the System will not open the series. However, if a sell market order imbalance exists, there is no bid in the series, and the best offer is $0.50 or less, the System will open the series; if there is no bid in the series and the best offer is greater than $0.50, the System will not open the series. The proposed rule change deletes the language regarding the exception for series that will open at a minimum increment.\32\ The proposed rule change also deletes the language from the current provision regarding sending a notification when this condition is present, because, as stated above, notifications go out when a series does not open for any reason.\33\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ Pursuant to Rule 6.13(b)(vi), in the situation in which there is no bid in the series and the best offer is $0.50 or less, the System considers these market orders to be limit orders for the minimum increment applicable to the series and enter these orders in the book (behind limit orders to sell at the minimum increment already resting in the book). Essentially, this creates a situation in which a series opens at a minimum price increment (i.e. $0.00- $0.05). In the situation in which there is no bid in the series and the best offer is greater than $0.50, if the no-bid series were to open while the best offer is greater than $0.50, under the rules, a market order to sell will be handled via the order handling system pursuant to Rule 6.12 rather than route to the book. See Notice, supra note 3, at 74833. \33\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74832-33 (describing in greater detail opening conditions set forth in proposed Rule 6.2B(d)(i)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separately, current Interpretation and Policy .03 to Rule 6.2B describes opening conditions that apply to classes in which the Exchange has activated HALO.\34\ Among other things, the current conditions take into consideration whether the opening trade would be at a price that is not the national best bid or offer.\35\ Current Interpretation and Policy .03(b) further describes what happens when each of these conditions is present, including exposure of marketable orders at the NBBO under certain conditions. The proposed rule change would amend the opening conditions applicable to classes in which the Exchange has activated HALO to provide as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ See id. at 74833-34 (providing a detailed description of the current opening conditions that apply to classes in which HALO is activated). The Exchange proposes to reorganize Rule 6.2B to keep the description of the applicable opening conditions for all classes in a single location within the rules. Therefore, the proposed rule change moves these opening conditions to proposed subparagraph (d)(ii) of Rule 6.2B. See id. at 74834, n.23. \35\ See id. at 74833. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) If there are no quotes on the Exchange or disseminated from at least one away exchange present in the series, the System will not open the series; (2) if the width between the best quote bid and best quote offer, which may consist of Market-Makers quotes or bids and offers disseminated from an away exchange, is wider than the OEPW range and there are orders or quotes marketable against each other or that lock or cross the OEPW range, the System will not open the series. However, if the opening quote width is no wider than the IEPW range and there are no orders or quotes marketable against each other or that lock or cross the OEPW range, the System will open the series. If the opening quote width is wider than the IEPW range, the System will not open the series. If the opening quote for a series consists solely of bids and offers disseminated from an away exchange(s), the System will open the series by matching orders and quotes to the extent they can trade and will report the opening trade, if any, at the opening trade price. The System will then exposes any remaining marketable buy (sell) orders at the widest offer (bid) point of the OEPW range or NBO (NBB), whichever is lower (higher).\36\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ Additionally, according to the Exchange, because all quotes entered by Market-Makers (including quotes entered during the pre- opening period and opening rotation period) must satisfy bid/ask differentials, the Exchange proposes to delete the reference to bid/ ask differential requirements from Rule 6.2B. See id. at 74834, n.24 and accompanying text. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) if the opening trade price would be outside the OEPW range or the NBBO, the System will open the series by matching orders and quotes to the extent they can trade and will report the opening trade, if any, at an opening trade price not outside either the OEPW range or NBBO. The System will then expose any remaining marketable buy (sell) orders at the widest offer (bid) point of the OEPW range or NBO (NBB), whichever is lower (higher); (4) if the opening trade would leave a market order imbalance, the System will open the series by matching orders and quotes to the extent they can trade and will report the opening trade, if any, at the opening trade price. The System will then expose any remaining marketable buy (sell) orders at the widest offer (bid) point of the OEPW range or NBO (NBB), whichever is lower (higher); or (5) if the opening quote bid (offer) or the NBB (NBO) crosses the opening quote offer (bid) or the NBO (NBB) by more than an amount determined by the Exchange on a class-by-class and premium basis, the System will not open the series.\37\ If the opening quote bid (offer) or NBO (NBO) crosses the opening quote offer (bid) or NBO (NBB) by no more than the specified amount, the System will open the series by matching orders and quotes to the extent they can trade and will report the opening trade, if any, at the opening trade price. The System then exposes any remaining marketable buy (sell) orders at the widest offer (bid) point of the OEPW range or NBO (NBB), whichever is lower (higher). If the best away market bid and offer are inverted by no more than the specified amount, there is a marketable order on each side of the series, and the System opens the series, the System will expose the order on the side with the larger size and route for execution the order on the side with the smaller size to an away exchange that is at the NBBO.\38\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ Currently, this amount is $0.25 for options with prices less than $3.00 and $0.50 for options with prices of $3.00 or more. See id. at 74835, n.26. \38\ See id. at 74834-35. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, the proposed rule change makes other changes to current Interpretation and Policy .03, while retaining and moving around certain other provisions.\39\ Among other things, for example, because the Exchange no longer uses an allocation period, it proposes to delete the provision regarding the allocation period of the HAL openings.\40\ In addition, the proposed rule change deletes Interpretation and Policy .03(c)(i) regarding the priority of orders and quotes during the open for classes in which the Exchange has activated HAL [[Page 90900]] for openings, as it is the same as the priority in proposed subparagraph (c)(i)(C).\41\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \39\ The proposed rule change stipulates that any remaining balances of orders not executed after the exposure period will enter the book at their limit prices (to the extent consistent with Rule 6.53) or route via the order handling system pursuant to Rule 6.12 in accordance with their routing instructions. See Notice, supra note 3, at 74835, n.27. \40\ See id. at 74835. \41\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also proposes to add subparagraph (d)(iii), which provides that if the System does not open a series pursuant subparagraphs (i) or (ii), notwithstanding proposed paragraph (c) (which states the opening rotation period may not last more than 60 seconds), the opening rotation period continues (including the dissemination of EOIs) until the condition causing the delay is satisfied or the Exchange otherwise determines it is necessary to open a series in accordance with proposed paragraph (e).\42\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \42\ Current Rule 6.2B(h) and proposed Rule 6.2B(g) provide that the opening procedures described in the rule may also be used after the close of a trading session for series that open pursuant to HOSS. The proposed rule change makes non-substantive changes to proposed paragraph (g) to more clearly and simply state the potential applicability of the opening procedures to a closing rotation for series that open pursuant to HOSS and to include additional detail regarding the notification to Trading Permit Holders regarding the decision to conduct a closing rotation. The proposed rule change also amends the name of Rule 6.2B to indicate that the procedures may also be used for closing rotations. See id. at 74835, n.28. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hybrid 3.0 Classes The proposed rule change moves Rule 6.2B, Interpretation and Policy .01(a), which establishes a modified opening procedure for classes that trade on the Hybrid 3.0 platform, into the body of the rule in proposed paragraph (h). Interpretation and Policy .01 generally describes the modified opening procedures for Hybrid 3.0 series that are used to calculate volatility indexes.\43\ The Exchange noted in its filing that current paragraph (a), however, applies to Hybrid 3.0 classes on all trading days, not just the days on which the Exchange uses the modified opening procedures.\44\ The proposed rule change therefore moves this provision to proposed paragraph (h) within the body of the rule, rather than the Interpretation and Policy. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \43\ The only series trading on Hybrid 3.0 are SPX index options. See, e.g., CBOE FAQs, available at: https://www.cboe.org/publish/mmfaq/mmfaq.pdf (``All option classes on CBOE are Hybrid classes, except SPX, which contains both Hybrid series (SPX Weeklys under trading symbol SPXW) and Hybrid 3.0 series (all other SPX series under trading symbol SPX).''). \44\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74835-36. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The introduction to proposed paragraph (h) states that all the provisions set forth in Rule 6.2B apply to the opening of Hybrid 3.0 series except as follows in subparagraphs (i) and (ii). Proposed paragraph (h)(i) provides that only the LMM or DPM with an appointment or allocation, respectively, to the class or series may enter quotes prior to the opening of trading, subject to the obligation set forth in Rule 8.15 or 8.85, respectively. Proposed paragraph (h)(ii) states that during the pre-opening period, the System will accept all order types eligible for entry from public customers (consistent with current paragraph (a) in Interpretation and Policy .01), but adds that the System only accepts opening rotation orders from non-public customers.\45\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \45\ See id. at 74836. Pursuant to Rule 7.4(a), public customer orders are eligible for entry into the electronic book. While non- public customers may submit orders in Hybrid classes for entry into the book, the Exchange may determine on a class-by-class basis that non-public customers may also submit orders in Hybrid 3.0 classes for entry into the book; currently, the Exchange has determined not to permit this. See id. at 74836, n.31. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Modified Opening Procedures on Volatility Index Settlement Dates The proposed rule change amends the modified opening procedures for classes and series used to calculate volatility indexes on the exercise and final settlement dates. Current Interpretation and Policy .01(b) requires the DPM or LMM to enter opening quotes in all series in a Hybrid 3.0 class during a modified opening procedure. The proposed rule change deletes this obligation. As a result, the opening quoting obligations in Rules 8.15 and 8.85, as applicable, would apply to LMMs and DPMs, respectively, in Hybrid 3.0 classes on volatility settlement days.\46\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ See id. at 74836. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Rule 6.2B, Interpretation and Policy .01(c) describes a modified opening procedure that applies to series in Hybrid 3.0 classes that are used to calculate a volatility index on expiration and final settlement dates for those indexes.\47\ The introductory paragraph of current paragraph (c) states that to facilitate the calculation of exercise or final settlement values for options or futures contracts on volatility indexes, the Exchange will utilize a modified HOSS opening procedure for any Hybrid 3.0 series with respect to which a volatility index is calculated. This modified opening procedure will be utilized only on the expiration and final settlement dates of the options or futures contracts on the applicable volatility index for each expiration. The Exchange states that the proposed introductory paragraph to Interpretation and Policy .01 simplifies these two sentences, which CBOE believes are redundant, and states that on the dates on which the exercise and final settlement values are calculated for options \48\ or (security) futures contracts on a volatility index (i.e., expiration and final settlement dates), the Exchange will utilize the modified opening procedure described in that Interpretation and Policy for all series used to calculate the exercise/final settlement value of the volatility index for expiring options and (security) futures contracts (i.e., constituent options).\49\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \47\ Interpretation and Policy .08 has a substantially similar procedure for series in Hybrid classes that are used to calculate volatility indexes on settlement dates. As discussed below, the proposed rule change deletes Interpretation and Policy .08 and applies Interpretation and Policy .01 to all classes. All proposed changes to Interpretation and Policy .01 described in this section of the rule filing will thus apply to the modified opening procedure for both Hybrid and Hybrid 3.0 classes. See id. at 74836, n.34. \48\ The proposed rule references Rules 24.9(a)(5) and (6) (which references are also included in current Rule 6.2B, Interpretation and Policy .08), which describe the method of determining the day on which the exercise settlement value will be calculated for volatility indexes with a 30-day volatility period and VXST, respectively. See id. at 74836, n.35. \49\ See id. at 74836. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Interpretation and Policy .01(c)(i) states that all orders, other than spread or non-OPG contingency orders, will be eligible to be placed on the electronic book for those option contract expirations whose prices are used to derive the volatility indexes on which options and futures are traded, for the purpose of permitting those orders to participate in the opening price calculation for the applicable series. Since the Exchange permits the same order types during the modified opening procedure as it does during the standard procedure, the proposed rule change deletes this paragraph.\50\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \50\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74836-37. The Exchange requires, and will continue to require, LMMs (or DPMs) in Hybrid 3.0 classes to enter opening quotes in series that may be used to calculate the exercise and final settlement values of options or futures on the volatility index on expiration and final settlement dates. Additionally, LMMs and DPMs must enter quotes within a certain timeframe on all trading days. See id. at 74832. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exchange Determinations Current Rule 6.2B provides in various places, including paragraphs (b)(ii), (e) and (f) and Interpretations and Policies .01 and .08, that Exchange Floor Officials may determine whether to modify the opening procedures when they deem necessary. The Exchange proposes to delete these references and combine them into current paragraph (f) and proposed paragraph (e). Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend proposed paragraph (e) to state that senior Help Desk personnel make these determinations.\51\ The proposed [[Page 90901]] rule change lists examples of actions Senior Help Desk personnel may take in the interests of commencing or maintaining a fair and orderly market, in the event of unusual market conditions, or in the public interest, including delaying or compelling the opening of any series in any options class, modifying timers or settings described in Rule 6.2B, and not using the modified opening procedure set forth in proposed Interpretation and Policy .01. The proposed rule change adds that the Exchange will make and maintain records to document all determinations to deviate from the standard manner of the opening procedure, and periodically review these determinations.\52\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \51\ Current paragraph (b)(ii) references the Exchange Control Room. The Control Room is now referred to as the Help Desk, so the Exchange proposes to delete the references to the Control Room. See id. at 74837, n.37. \52\ See id. at 74837. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, there are various provisions throughout Rule 6.2B that allow the Exchange to make certain determinations on a class-by-class basis. However, pursuant to Rule 8.14, Interpretation and Policy .01,\53\ the Exchange may authorize groups of series of a class to trade on different trading platforms, and thus, the Exchange would make determinations for each group rather than the class as a whole. Proposed Interpretation and Policy .05 provides that, for these groups, the Exchange may make determinations pursuant to Rule 6.2B and the Interpretations and Policies thereunder on a group-by-group basis that would otherwise be made on a class-by-class basis. The proposed rule change also adds to proposed Interpretation and Policy .05 that it will announce via Regulatory Circular with appropriate advance notice any determinations it makes under Rule 6.2B, to ensure Trading Permit Holders are aware of these determinations and have sufficient time to make any necessary changes in response to the determinations.\54\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \53\ Rule 8.14, Interpretation and Policy .01, provides that the Exchange may determine to authorize a group of series of a Hybrid 3.0 class to trade on the Hybrid system, in which case the Exchange would establish trading parameters on a group basis to the extent rules otherwise provide for such parameters to be established on a class basis. See id. at 74838, n.39. \54\ See id. at 74838. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Obsolete and Duplicate Language The proposed rule change proposes to delete certain provisions because it believes the language is obsolete or duplicative. Those changes include the following: Current Rule 6.2B(b)(ii) describes how a DPM or LMM, as applicable, takes part in determining the cause of a delay in the opening of an underlying security, and that the Exchange may consider such information when deciding whether to open a series despite the delay in the opening of the underlying. According to CBOE, the CBOE Help Desk generally is aware of delayed openings in the underlying securities and thus this provision is no longer necessary. Additionally, the Exchange's Help Desk would have the ability to compel the opening of a series pursuant to proposed Rule 6.2B(f) and therefore proposes to delete this provision.\55\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \55\ See id. at 74837. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also proposes to delete current Interpretation and Policy .01(c)(v), which states the HOSS system will automatically generate cancels immediately prior to the opening of the applicable index option series for broker-dealer, Market-Maker, away market-maker, and specialist (i.e., non-public customer) orders that remain on the book following the modified HOSS opening procedures. Since the System will cancel opening rotation orders that do not execute during the opening rotation of a series, the Exchange believes this provision is redundant. Further, the Exchange proposes to delete current Interpretation and Policy .01(c)(vi) regarding publication of an imbalance of contracts, as this is covered by proposed Rule 6.2B(d)(iii) regarding dissemination of expected opening messages if a series does not open. The proposed rule change deletes Interpretation and Policy .08. The modified opening procedures described in Interpretations and Policies .01 and .08 are nearly identical for Hybrid and Hybrid 3.0 classes. Therefore, the proposed rule change applies Interpretation and Policy .01 (as amended by this proposed rule change) to all classes.\56\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \56\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74838. The proposed rule change deletes references to VXST, the CBOE Short-Term Volatility Index, in Interpretation and Policy .01, as VXST is only one type of volatility index and is not unique in its treatment under this rule. See id. at n.38. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-Substantive Changes The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, makes numerous non-substantive and clerical changes throughout Rule 6.2B and in Rules 6.1A(e)(iii)(C), 6.13(b)(v)(B)(V), 6.53(l), 8.15(b)(v), 8.85(a)(xi), and 17.50(g)(14), including adding or amending headings and defined terms, updating cross-references, adding introductory and clarifying language, using consistent language and punctuation, and replacing terms such as ``option series'' with series.\57\ The proposed rule change also amends current Rule 6.2B(g) and proposed Rule 6.2B(f) to clarify that the procedure described in Rule 6.2B may be used to reopen a series, in addition to a class, after a trading halt to address a potential situation in which only certain series are subjected to halt. The proposed rule change also adds detail regarding notice of use of this opening procedure following a trading halt and clarifies that the procedure would be the same, though depending on facts and circumstances, there may be no pre-opening period or a shorter pre-opening period. Proposed paragraph (f) further states the Exchange will announce the reopening of a class or series after a trading halt as soon as practicable via verbal message to the trading floor and electronic message to Trading Permit Holders that request to receive such messages.\58\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \57\ The Exchange notes that all series listed for trading on the Exchange are for options, therefore it does not believe that including the word ``option'' is necessary. See id. at 74838. \58\ See id. at 74838. CBOE also notes that the Exchange may reopen a class after a trading halt as otherwise set forth in the Rules, including Rules 6.3, 6.3B, and 6.3C. See id. at n.40. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also proposes to amend Interpretation and Policy .04, which states the Exchange may determine on a class-by-class basis which electronic algorithm from Rule 6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable, applies to the class during rotations. The proposed rule change makes the electronic algorithm that applies to a class intraday the default algorithm during rotations, but leaves the Exchange flexibility to apply a different algorithm to a class during rotations if it deems necessary or appropriate.\59\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \59\ See id. at 74838. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion and Commission Findings After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act,\60\ and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\61\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\62\ which requires, among other things, that a national securities exchange have rules designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of [[Page 90902]] trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \60\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. \61\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). \62\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the proposed rule change reorganizes and attempts to clarify the description of the opening (and sometimes closing) procedures, deletes text that the Exchange believes is either obsolete or unnecessary, removes certain discretion for the Exchange to make determinations under the rule on a class-by-class basis where CBOE no longer needs that discretion, and is intended to promote greater consistency across Rule 6.2B. The Commission notes that these changes may offer market participants a better understanding of how the Exchange's opening (and sometimes closing) procedures operate. To the extent the changes achieve that goal, they may promote transparency, reduce the potential for investor confusion, and assist market participants in deciding whether to participate in CBOE's trading rotations and, if they do participate, have confidence and certainty as to how their orders will be processed by the CBOE System. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade by seeking to ensure that series open in a fair and orderly manner with sufficient liquidity and opportunities for execution at prices that are determined by market forces. In particular, the Exchange notes that the proposed rule change is designed to ensure that market participants are aware of the circumstances under which the System may not open a series.\63\ Further, although the proposed rule change deletes the obligation for LMMs in Hybrid 3.0 classes to enter opening orders and quotes on volatility settlement dates, the Exchange has represented that it does not believe that this change will impact the balance of LMM obligations and benefits, as this obligation has been applied only to a brief period of time on a limited number of days.\64\ In addition, LMMs in Hybrid 3.0 must enter opening quotes in accordance with the obligation in Rule 8.15, including in series of classes that may be used to calculate the exercise and final settlement values of options or futures on the volatility index on settlement dates.\65\ The Exchange believes that the standard opening quoting obligation, in addition to other general obligations applicable to LMMs, provides sufficient liquidity in these series on the volatility settlement days.\66\ Thus, CBOE does not believe it is necessary to impose additional opening quoting obligations on LMMs on those days. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \63\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 74839. \64\ See id. \65\ See id. \66\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, the proposed change more clearly specifies the situations in which the modified opening procedures replace the opening procedures on settlement dates for certain series. The proposed rule change also sets out the circumstances when the Exchange may exercise discretion and strives to narrow that discretion within certain established parameters.\67\ The proposed rule change further requires the Exchange to document and periodically review Exchange decisions made under the rule, including any deviations from the standard opening procedures, and specifies that only senior Exchange officials can make those determinations and must do so in limited specified circumstances with specific regard to the public interest.\68\ In this manner, Exchange determinations made under the rule should be transparent and made with due regard to the Exchange's obligations under the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \67\ Exchange determinations, including the establishment of parameters governing the opening process, will be set forth in Regulatory Circulars (or as otherwise specified by the Exchange under the proposed rule). On account of the critical importance of this information to investors' understanding of how the Exchange's System operates, CBOE should ensure that such information is prominently displayed, readily searchable and retrievable, up-to- date, and comprehensive. \68\ See proposed Rule 6.2B(e). See also Notice, supra note 3, at 74837. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. IV. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-CBOE-2016-071 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2016-071. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2016-071, and should be submitted on or before January 5, 2017. V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 The Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice of the amended proposal in the Federal Register. In Amendment No. 1,\69\ CBOE updated a cross- reference to Rule 6.2B in Rule 6.13. This change is consistent with the proposal as initially filed, and corrects [[Page 90903]] a now-obsolete rule reference. The change does not introduce material, new, or novel concepts. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\70\ to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \69\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 4. \70\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VI. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\71\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-2016-071), as modified by Amendment No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \71\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). \72\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\72\ Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-30082 Filed 12-14-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![90896 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices
competitive response to analogous Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
programs offered by other options COMMISSION
exchanges. The Exchange believes this • Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ [Release No. 34–79520; File No. SR–CBOE–
proposed rule change is necessary to 2016–071]
permit fair competition among the rules/sro.shtml); or
options exchanges. • Send an email to rule-comments@ Self-Regulatory Organizations;
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Statement on Comments on the BatsBZX–2016–84 on the subject line. Incorporated; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Received From Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting
Paper Comments
Members, Participants or Others Accelerated Approval of a Proposed
• Send paper comments in triplicate Rule Change, as Modified by
The Exchange has not solicited, and Amendment No. 1, Relating To
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
does not intend to solicit, comments on Opening and Closing Rotations Under
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
this proposed rule change. The the HOSS System
Exchange has not received any written Washington, DC 20549–1090.
comments from members or other All submissions should refer to File No. December 9, 2016.
interested parties. SR–BatsBZX–2016–84. This file number I. Introduction
III. Date of Effectiveness of the should be included on the subject line
On October 7, 2016, Chicago Board
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for if email is used. To help the Options Exchange, Incorporated
Commission Action Commission process and review your (‘‘CBOE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
comments more efficiently, please use Securities and Exchange Commission
Because the foregoing proposed rule only one method. The Commission will
change does not: (A) Significantly affect (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
post all comments on the Commission’s 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
the protection of investors or the public Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
interest; (B) impose any significant of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
burden on competition; and (C) by its
submission, all subsequent amend its rules relating to the opening
terms, become operative for 30 days
amendments, all written statements of series for trading on the Exchange.
from the date on which it was filed or
such shorter time as the Commission with respect to the proposed rule The Commission published the
may designate it has become effective change that are filed with the proposed rule change for comment in
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Commission, and all written the Federal Register on October 27,
Act 8 and paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b– communications relating to the 2016.3 On November 18, 2016, the
4 thereunder,9 the Exchange has proposed rule change between the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
designated this rule filing as non- Commission and any person, other than proposed rule change.4 The Commission
controversial. The Exchange has given those that may be withheld from the received no comments on the proposal.
the Commission written notice of its public in accordance with the This order provides notice of filing of
intent to file the proposed rule change, provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Amendment No. 1 and approves the
along with a brief description and text available for Web site viewing and proposed rule change, as modified by
of the proposed rule change at least five printing in the Commission’s Public Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated
business days prior to the date of filing Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., basis.
of the proposed rule change, or such Washington, DC 20549, on official II. Description of the Proposed Rule
shorter time as designated by the business days between the hours of Change
Commission. 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such CBOE proposes to amend its rules
At any time within 60 days of the filing will also be available for relating to the opening of series for
filing of the proposed rule change, the inspection and copying at the principal trading on the Exchange. Rule 6.2B
Commission summarily may office of the Exchange. All comments describes the process (referred to as
temporarily suspend such rule change if received will be posted without change; ‘‘HOSS’’) that the Exchange’s Hybrid
it appears to the Commission that such the Commission does not edit personal Trading System (the ‘‘System’’) uses to
action is: (1) Necessary or appropriate in identifying information from open series on the Exchange each
the public interest; (2) for the protection submissions. You should submit only trading day. The Exchange may also use
of investors; or (3) otherwise in information that you wish to make HOSS for closing series or opening
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. available publicly. All submissions
If the Commission takes such action, the should refer to File No. SR–BatsBZX– 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Commission shall institute proceedings 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2016–84 and should be submitted on or
to determine whether the proposed rule 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79133
before January 5, 2017.
should be approved or disapproved. (October 21, 2016), 81 FR 74828 (October 27, 2016)
For the Commission, by the Division of (‘‘Notice’’).
IV. Solicitation of Comments Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
4 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange updated a
cross-reference to Rule 6.2B in Rule 6.13. To
Interested persons are invited to authority.10 promote transparency of its proposed amendment,
submit written data, views and Eduardo A. Aleman, when CBOE filed Amendment No. 1 with the
arguments concerning the foregoing, Commission, it also submitted Amendment No. 1 as
Assistant Secretary.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
a comment letter to the file, which the Commission
including whether the proposal is [FR Doc. 2016–30095 Filed 12–14–16; 8:45 am] posted on its Web site and placed in the public
consistent with the Act. Comments may BILLING CODE 8011–01–P comment file for SR–CBOE–2016–071 (available at
be submitted by any of the following https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2016-071/
methods: cboe2016071.shtml). The Exchange also posted a
copy of its Amendment No. 1 on its Web site
(http://www.cboe.com/aboutcboe/legal/
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). submittedsecfilings.aspx), when it filed it with the
9 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:19 Dec 14, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM 15DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91137/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices 90903
a now-obsolete rule reference. The Notice 9329; and 80 FR 73865, Public 49 CFR part 236. FRA assigned the
change does not introduce material, Notice 9358). petition Docket Number FRA–2016–
new, or novel concepts. Accordingly, On July 5, 2016, the United States 0118. BRC seeks relief from the
the Commission finds good cause, Government published a notice requirements of 49 CFR 236.109 Time
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the announcing the imposition of measures releases, timing relays and timing
Act,70 to approve the proposed rule including the following against devices. BRC requests relief from
change, as modified by Amendment No. Rosoboronexport (ROE) (Russia) and § 236.109 as it applies to variable timers
1, on an accelerated basis. any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary within the program logic of the
thereof: ‘‘No department or agency of operating software of microprocessor-
VI. Conclusion based equipment.
the United States Government may
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to procure or enter into any contract for BRC states that timing devices
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,71 that the the procurement of any goods, contained within microprocessor-based
proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2016– technology, or services from equipment are typically non-variable
071), as modified by Amendment No. 1, Rosoboronexport (ROE) (Russia) and and are within the program logic of the
be, and hereby is, approved on an any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary operating software. BRC notes, however,
accelerated basis. thereof, except to the extent that the that some microprocessor-based
For the Commission, by the Division of Secretary of State otherwise may equipment have variable timers. BRC is
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated determine. . . .’’ (See 81 FR 43696, requesting relief from the requirement of
authority.72 Public Notice 9624). checking the actual time interval of
Eduardo A. Aleman, The United States Government has microprocessor-based variable timers.
Assistant Secretary. decided to modify the measures Such variable timers will use
described above against ROE and any verification of the CRC/Check Sum/UCN
[FR Doc. 2016–30082 Filed 12–14–16; 8:45 am]
successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary of the existing location specific
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
thereof as follows: The measures application logic to the previously
described above shall not apply to tested version. A copy of the petition, as
United States Government procurement well as any written communications
DEPARTMENT OF STATE of goods, technology, and services for concerning the petition, is available for
the purchase, maintenance or review online at www.regulations.gov
[Public Notice: 9818]
sustainment of the Digital Electro and in person at the Department of
Modification of Iran, North Korea, and Optical Sensor OSDCAM4060, to Transportation’s (DOT) Docket
Syria Nonproliferation Act Measures improve the U.S. ability to monitor and Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Against a Russian Entity verify Russia’s Open Skies Treaty Avenue SE., W12–140, Washington, DC
compliance. 20590. The Docket Operations Facility
SUMMARY: A decision has been made, Such subcontracts include the is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
pursuant to the Iran, North Korea, and purchase of spare parts, supplies, and through Friday, except Federal
Syria Nonproliferation Act, to modify related services. Holidays.
nonproliferation measures pursuant to This modification does not apply to Interested parties are invited to
this Act on a Russian foreign person. any other measures imposed pursuant to participate in these proceedings by
DATES: Effective Date: December 15, the INKSNA and announced in Public submitting written views, data, or
2016. Notice 9251 published on September 2, comments. FRA does not anticipate
2015 (80 FR 53222) or Public Notice scheduling a public hearing in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
9624 published on July 5, 2016 (81 FR connection with these proceedings since
Jeffrey G. McCoy, Office of Euro- the facts do not appear to warrant a
Atlantic Security Affairs, Bureau of 43696).
hearing. If any interested party desires
Arms Control, Verification and Frank Rose, an opportunity for oral comment, they
Compliance, Department of State, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Arms Control, should notify FRA, in writing, before
Telephone (202) 647–4940. Verification and Compliance, Department of the end of the comment period and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On State. specify the basis for their request.
September 2, 2015, the United States [FR Doc. 2016–30158 Filed 12–14–16; 8:45 am] All communications concerning these
Government published a notice BILLING CODE 4710–35–P proceedings should identify the
announcing the imposition of measures appropriate docket number and may be
including the following against submitted by any of the following
Rosoboronexport (ROE) (Russia) and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION methods:
any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary • Web site: http://
thereof: ‘‘No department or agency of Federal Railroad Administration www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
the United States Government may [Docket Number FRA–2016–0118] instructions for submitting comments.
procure or enter into any contract for • Fax: 202–493–2251.
the procurement of any goods, Petition for Waiver of Compliance • Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
technology, or services from US Department of Transportation, 1200
Rosoboronexport (ROE) (Russia) and In accordance with part 211 of Title New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Washington, DC 20590.
thereof, except to the extent that the this document provides the public • Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Secretary of State otherwise may notice that by a document dated Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
determine. . . .’’ (See 80 FR 53222, November 14, 2016, The Beltway Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
Public Notice 9251; 80 FR 65844, Public Railway of Chicago (BRC) has petitioned and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
the Federal Railroad Administration except Federal Holidays.
70 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). (FRA) for a waiver of compliance from Communications received by January
71 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). certain provisions of the Federal 30, 2017 will be considered by FRA
72 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). railroad safety regulations contained at before final action is taken. Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:19 Dec 14, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM 15DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91137/page/8.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-15 01:10:32
Document Modified: 2016-12-15 01:10:32
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 90896 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR