81 FR 91646 - Definition of Form I-94 To Include Electronic Format
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 243 (December 19, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 243 (December 19, 2016)
| Page Range | 91646-91670 | |
| FR Document | 2016-30459 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 91646-91670] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-30459] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR PARTS 1, 210, 212, 214, 215, 231, 235, 245, 245a, 247, 253, 264, 274a, and 286 [Docket No. USCBP-2013-0011; CBP Dec. No. 16-27] RIN 1651-AA96 Definition of Form I-94 To Include Electronic Format AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule adopts, without change, interim amendments to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations which were published in the Federal Register on March 27, 2013, as CBP Dec. No. 13-06. These amendments enabled DHS to transition the issuance of the Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) to an automated process. In the automated process, DHS creates a Form I-94 in an electronic format based on passenger, passport and visa information DHS obtains electronically from air and sea carriers and the Department of State (DOS) as well as through the inspection process. This document addresses the comments received in response to the interim rule and discusses some operational modifications to the Form I-94 process that were implemented after publication of the interim rule. DATES: This final rule is effective January 18, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Shepherd, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operations by telephone (202) 344- 2073 or by email, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Abbreviations and Terms Used in This Document ACI-A Airports Council International-North America ACIP American Council on International Personnel ADIS Arrival and Departure Information System AILA American Immigration Lawyers Association APA Administrative Procedure Act APIS Advance Passenger Information Systems CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBSA Canadian Border Services Agency CCD Consular Consolidated Database CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security DIS Deferred Inspection Site DMV Departments of Motor Vehicles DOS Department of State DOT Department of Transportation ESTA Electronic System of Travel Authorization FAQ Frequently Asked Question FNU First Name Unknown FOIA Freedom of Information Act ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICE U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement IFR Interim Final Rule INA Immigration and Nationality Act INM Instituto Nacional de Migraci[oacute]n INS Immigration and Naturalization Service LNU Last Name Unknown MRZ Machine Readable Zone NAFSA NAFSA: Association of International Educators OIS Office of Immigration Statistics OMB Office of Management and Budget OTTI Office of Travel and Tourism Industries PIA Privacy Impact Assessment PII Personally Identifiable Information POE Port of Entry SAVE USCIS's Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program SEVIS Student and Exchange Visitor Information System SEVP Student and Exchange Visitor Information Program SHRM Society for Human Resource Management SSA Social Security Administration USCIS U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture VWP Visa Waiver Program Executive Summary The Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) is issued by DHS to certain nonimmigrant foreign nationals upon arrival in the United States or when they change status in the United States. [[Page 91647]] The Form I-94 is used to document arrival and departure and provides evidence of the terms of admission or parole. The Form I-94 is also used by individuals granted asylum in the United States as a proof of their grant of asylum and by refugees as proof of their refugee status. CBP, a component of DHS, generally issues the Form I-94 to nonimmigrants at the time they lawfully enter the United States. Nonimmigrant travelers use the Form I-94 for various purposes such as completing the Form I-9 to verify employment eligibility, applying for immigration benefits, or presenting to a university to verify eligibility for enrollment. On March 27, 2013, CBP published an interim final rule (IFR) in the Federal Register (78 FR 18457) that added to the regulations a definition of ``Form I-94'' to allow the Form I-94 to be in either paper or electronic format. Prior to the effective date of the IFR, the Form I-94 was a paper form only. The IFR made necessary changes to the regulations to enable CBP to transition from only paper to allow for an electronic form. In the case of air and sea ports of entry, the regulation allowed CBP to transition to an automated process whereby CBP creates an electronic Form I-94 based on information collected via the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) along with visa information transmitted to CBP by the Department of State. The automated process applies only to nonimmigrants arriving at air and sea ports of entry because APIS data is currently collected only for air and sea. The automation of the Form I-94 process for nonimmigrants arriving by air or sea eliminates duplicative information collections and saves time and money for the traveling public, carriers, and CBP. CBP makes the electronic Form I-94 available through a Web site. To access the Form I-94 through the Web site the traveler inputs information from his/her passport. If needed, nonimmigrants may print out a copy of the Form I-94 from the Web site and present it to third parties in lieu of the paper form. CBP continues to provide a paper Form I-94 to certain classes of aliens, such as asylees, certain parolees, and others upon request or whenever CBP determines the issuance of a paper form is appropriate.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ As of September 2015, CBP has automated the Form I-94 process for refugees. Refugees can now access their Form I-94 from the I-94 Web site. CBP no longer provides a paper Form I-94 to refugees unless one is requested or CBP determines that it is appropriate to issue one. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This regulation also is consistent with CBP's enhancements to the I-94 Web site to enable travelers arriving at a land port of entry to submit the Form I-94 information to CBP and pay the required fee prior to arrival. Unlike the automated process for air and sea where CBP creates an electronic Form I-94 based on information collected via APIS and other sources, this I-94 land border process enables travelers to provide the Form I-94 information to CBP electronically prior to arrival to facilitate the land border issuance process. The enhanced I- 94 Web site launched on September 29, 2016. DHS received eighteen submissions in response to the IFR. Most of these submissions contained comments providing support, voicing concerns, highlighting issues, or offering suggestions for modifications to the automation process. After review of the comments, CBP has decided to finalize the interim final rule without change. However, CBP has made some operational changes, primarily to the I-94 Web site, in response to the comments. These changes, which are described in the comment responses, are intended to help travelers retrieve their Form I-94 information and travel history more easily. CBP has completed an updated economic assessment analyzing the effects of the automation of the Form I-94. This rule affects CBP, air and sea carriers that transport foreign nationals to the United States, and the foreign nationals themselves. CBP will incur costs associated with linking its data systems and building and maintaining the I-94 Web site. CBP benefits through lower printing, storage, and contract costs. CBP estimated a net benefit of $15.5 million for CBP in 2013. Carriers benefit as a result of lower printing and storage costs. CBP estimated a net benefit of $1.3 million for carriers in 2013. Foreign nationals traveling to the United States incur opportunity costs associated with logging onto the Web site to access their electronic Form I-94, printing their Form I-94, and, for some travelers, the cost to drive to a location with internet access so they can access and print their electronic Form I-94. Foreign nationals benefit from a reduced opportunity cost associated with filling out a paper Form I-94 and reduced opportunity and fee costs associated with filing a Form I-102 to replace a lost Form I-94. CBP estimates a net benefit of between $4141.1 million and $6565.9 million in 2013 for foreign travelers. In total, CBP estimates that net benefits to all parties ranged from $5757.9 million to $8282.7 million in 2013. Net benefits to U.S. entities (carriers and CBP) totaled $16.8 million in 2013. Net benefits are summarized in table ES-1 below. Exhibit ES-1--Net Benefits [Undiscounted 2012$] * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 15,461,360 15,461,360 15,461,360 16,167,798 20,447,110 Carriers................................................ 0 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 41,109,614 76,986,391 80,597,880 85,173,424 93,439,507 Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 51,503,032 96,140,493 100,696,430 106,131,707 115,548,989 Travelers--High......................................... 0 65,882,967 122,641,373 128,504,014 135,128,784 146,138,820 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grand Total--Low.................................... -1,321,000 57,915,424 93,792,201 97,403,690 102,685,671 115,231,067 Grand Total--Primary................................ -1,321,000 68,308,842 112,946,303 117,502,240 123,643,955 137,340,549 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grand Total--High............................... -1,321,000 82,688,777 139,447,183 145,309,824 152,641,032 167,930,380 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. [[Page 91648]] Background The Form I-94 Prior to the implementation of the IFR, the Form I-94 was generally issued to foreign nationals at ports of entry (POEs) at the time they lawfully enter the United States. See 8 CFR 235.1(h). The Form I-94 is also issued when a foreign national changes immigration status within the United States. The Form I-94 is used to document status in the United States, the authorized length of stay, and departure. The Form I-94 collects biographical information, visa and passport information, and the address and phone number where the traveler can be reached while in the United States. The Form I-94 has been used for approximately 50 years by DHS, its predecessor agencies, and external stakeholders for a variety of purposes. CBP and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), components of DHS, use the form to document arrival and departure, as well as class of admission or duration of parole. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), also a component of DHS, issues Forms I- 94 to foreign nationals extending their authorized length of stay or changing their immigration status while in the United States and to individuals granted asylum or refugee status in the United States as proof of their grant of asylum or refugee status. USCIS also uses Form I-94 information to verify lawful admission or parole when adjudicating immigration benefit requests, confirming employment authorization for employers participating in USCIS's E-Verify program, or verifying immigration status for benefit granting state and federal government agencies participating in USCIS's Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program. The Form I-94 is also used by the Social Security Administration (SSA), state agencies, such as Departments of Motor Vehicles (DMV), and public assistance agencies and organizations, to verify eligibility for benefits. The form is used by certain foreign nationals for evidence of lawful admission or parole, as well as, where applicable, employment eligibility and eligibility for public benefits. For more complete information on the Form I-94, its uses, and the automation, please refer to the background section of the IFR. Automation of the Form I-94 at Airports and Seaports Nearly all of the traveler information collected on the Form I-94 is also collected by CBP in advance of the traveler's arrival via the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS). Using information collected via APIS along with visa information transmitted to CBP by DOS, CBP is now able to generate Forms I-94 electronically, which reduces paperwork burdens for travelers and reduces costs for air and sea carriers and CBP. On March 27, 2013, CBP published an IFR in the Federal Register (78 FR 18457) amending the DHS regulations to include new definitions at 8 CFR 1.4 for the term ``Form I-94'' and other terms when used in relation to the Form I-94. The IFR became effective on April 26, 2013, and on that date, CBP began the transition to an automated Form I-94 process whereby CBP creates an electronic Form I-94 for travelers arriving by air or sea based on the information in its databases. CBP continues to provide a paper Form I-94 to those who request such form, as well as to certain classes of aliens, such as asylees, certain parolees, and whenever CBP determines the issuance of a paper form is appropriate. For these individuals arriving by air and sea carriers, an electronic Form I-94 is also created. Travelers are able to access and print their electronic Form I-94 via the Web site CBP has established for this purpose: www.cbp.gov/I94.\2\ Travelers to whom an electronic Form I-94 has been issued may log on to the Web site using identifying information and print a copy of the electronic Form I-94. In order to access the Form I-94 from the Web site, the traveler is required to enter information from his or her passport; thus, a third party without access to the traveler's passport is not able to access the Form I-94 from the Web site. The printout from the Web site is the equivalent of the departure portion of the paper form and contains the same information as the departure portion of the paper form. CBP continues to stamp the traveler's passport at the time of inspection and will annotate the stamp with the class of admission or parole and duration of admission or parole. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The direct link is: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/request.html. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Enhanced Form I-94 Land Border Process In addition to the automation of the Form I-94 at air and sea ports of entry, on September 29, 2016, CBP modified the process by which a traveler arriving at the land border can provide Form I-94 information and pay the related fee by adding an electronic option. Specifically, CBP enhanced the I-94 Web site to enable travelers arriving at a land port of entry to submit the Form I-94 information to CBP and pay the required fee prior to arrival. CBP expects that these enhancements will result in time savings to travelers who choose this option. Before September 29, 2016, when a traveler requiring a Form I-94 arrived at the land border, he/she provided the I-94 information to a CBP officer who input the data into a CBP computer system. After determining the traveler's admissibility, the CBP officer printed a Form I-94A \3\ for the traveler and referred him/her to the cashier to pay the $6 fee.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The Form I-94A is the version of the Form I-94 that CBP issues at land ports of entry. \4\ The amount of fee for the issuance of the Form I-94 at a land border port of entry is provided for in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(ii)(D). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the new process, a traveler who requires an I-94 and intends to enter the United States at a land port of entry will have the option to either follow the above process or to apply for an I-94 and pay the $6 fee up to seven days in advance of arrival. Using the I-94 Web site, the traveler enters all of the necessary data for I-94 processing that would be collected by CBP at the port of entry. Upon paying the fee, the traveler will receive a ``provisional I-94''. This ``provisional I- 94'' will become effective after the traveler presents it to a CBP officer at a land port of entry and completes the issuance process with a CBP officer. If the ``provisional I-94'' is not processed within 7 days of submitting the application, it will expire and the fee will be forfeited. The I-94 Web site will instruct the traveler to appear at the land port of entry for an interview and biometric collection. When the traveler arrives at the port of entry, he/she completes the issuance process with a CBP officer. The CBP officer will locate the traveler's information by swiping the traveler's passport or other travel document in CBP's database. This will verify that the fee was paid and pre- populate the data fields from the document swipe and the information provided by the traveler in the Web site. If the CBP officer determines that the traveler is admissible, the CBP officer will print out a Form I-94A to give to the traveler. Discussion of Comments Overview Although CBP promulgated the IFR without first soliciting public comment, CBP provided a thirty-day post-promulgation comment period soliciting public comments that CBP would consider before adopting the interim regulations as final. CBP received [[Page 91649]] eighteen submissions in response to the IFR. Commenters included individuals, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), the American Council on International Personnel (ACIP), the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), Feld Entertainment, Inc., the Intel Corporation, NAFSA: Association of International Educators (NAFSA), and the Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA). Many commenters raised multiple issues, and several issues were raised by numerous commenters. Of the eighteen submissions, most included comments seeking clarification of specific issues, highlighting concerns or issues with the Form I-94 automation, or offering solutions to issues or alternatives. Several of the operational issues raised by commenters have already been addressed by CBP, which our responses reflect. CBP has grouped the issues by topic and provides responses below. Benefits of Automation Comment: Many commenters were supportive of the change to an electronic Form I-94, saying that it will provide increased efficiency for passengers, airlines, and CBP. Commenters said that no longer requiring passengers to fill out the paper form on the plane while en route to the United States would not only save passengers time, but would also save air carriers time and money and would free up airline staff to perform other duties. Commenters also anticipated reduced wait times at the POEs, and increased officer efficiency. Response: CBP appreciates this feedback and agrees that the automation of the Form I-94 benefits the traveling public, air and sea carriers, and CBP. Comment: One commenter requested that the Form I-94 be automated for the land ports as well as air and sea, as this will help reduce wait times and improve commerce at the land border. Response: CBP agrees that automating the Form I-94 at land POEs would provide benefits to travelers and is exploring expanding automation to include land border POEs. However, the electronic Form I- 94 relies in large part on information collected via APIS, and APIS data is currently collected only for air and sea. Therefore, CBP cannot fully automate the Form I-94 process at land border POE's at this time. CBP's enhanced Form I-94 land border process, however, is expected to increase the efficiency of the entry process and reduce administrative duties for CBP officers, ultimately resulting in shorter wait times for travelers requiring a Form I-94. Regulatory Amendments Comment: One commenter requested that the Form I-94 printout from the I-94 Web site be added to the list of evidence of registration for purposes of Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 264(e). Response: The list of acceptable registration documents for purposes of INA 264(e) is found in 8 CFR 264.1(b). The Form I-94, Arrival-Departure Record, is already included in the list of evidence of registration in 8 CFR 264.1(b). The IFR added a new provision to the regulations to define ``Form I-94'' and related terms. The new definition makes clear that the Form I-94 now includes information collected electronically, and also defines ``original Form I-94'' to include the printout from the I-94 Web site. Due to the new definition provided for the Form I-94, CBP believes it is clear that the printout constitutes evidence of registration and no further change is needed. Comment: One commenter requested that the definition of ``original document'' in 8 CFR 274a.2(b)(1)(v) be amended to include a Form I-94 printout. Response: CBP believes that the definition of ``original Form I- 94'' included in the IFR accomplishes the desired result, and, therefore, it is not necessary to amend 8 CFR 274a.2(b)(1)(v). That definition provides that the term `original Form I-94' includes, but is not limited to, any printout or electronic transmission of information from DHS systems containing the electronic record of admission or arrival/departure. See 8 CFR 1.4(d). 8 CFR 274a.2 concerns the Form I- 9, which is a USCIS form. USCIS agrees that a printout of the Form I-94 from the Web site constitutes an ``original document'' under this regulation. Comment: One commenter, NAFSA, requested that paragraph (e) of section 1.4 be amended to add ``or electronic transmission'' after the word ``printout.'' The commenter states that the revision would clarify that a traveler may present an electronic version of the Form I-94, such as a PDF or image scan. Response: CBP believes that such amendment is unnecessary and could cause confusion as to what can be presented or submitted in various situations. For example, at this time, a printout of the Form I-94 is still necessary in a number of situations, including the completion of the USCIS Form I-9. However, the current definition specifically states that the terms in question ``are not limited to'' providing a printout, and thus, could be applied more broadly as appropriate by stakeholders. Although CBP is hopeful that the Form I-94 in electronic form will be accepted in the future by all stakeholders to whom these regulations apply and that a printout will not always be required, that is not the case now. Administrative Procedure Act Comment: One commenter, Feld Entertainment, Inc., disagreed that the rulemaking is procedural. The commenter states that because the rule was promulgated without prior notice and comment, it violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The commenter was also concerned that the comments received in response to the IFR would be disregarded. Response: The IFR enabled CBP to transition to an automated process whereby CBP creates a Form I-94 in an electronic format. CBP has not changed the substantive regulations relating to the Form I-94, but only the operational means by which CBP issues the form. Thus, the rule is a procedural rule exempt from prior notice-and-comment requirements under the APA. CBP already has adopted a number of the commenters' operational suggestions, which are described in many of the responses below. Many of the commenters' questions have been addressed on the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site for easy reference. Web Site and Printouts Comment: One commenter noted that the Web site option is helpful for those who lose or misplace their Forms I-94, or when the paper form becomes so worn that it is no longer accepted by agencies. Response: CBP appreciates this feedback, and agrees that the Web site makes it easier for travelers to obtain copies of their Forms I-94 when necessary. Since the implementation of the Form I-94 automation, CBP has expanded the Web site to provide additional benefits, including allowing nonimmigrants to access their five-year travel history. Comment: A few commenters requested that the Web site be updated to reflect changes in status granted by USCIS. Commenters said that, if this is done, nonimmigrants who have had a change of status will not have to file a Form I-102 for a replacement Form I-94 if needed. Response: CBP agrees that providing this information through the Web site would be helpful and would reduce the number of Forms I-102 that would be filed. The Form I-102 is the USCIS form [[Page 91650]] nonimmigrants use to apply for a new or replacement Form I-94. Adding information about changes of status granted by USCIS to the Web site is not currently possible. However, CBP is looking into whether USCIS information can be reliably added to the Web site in the future. Any updates on this issue will be included in the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site. Comment: A few commenters, including AILA, disagreed with the assumption in the economic analysis that B-1/B-2 visa holders would not access the Web site. Commenters said that these visa holders, especially those in the United States for at least six months, would have reason to obtain their Form I-94 records or may wish to obtain a record of their admission for future use. Response: CBP agrees that some B-1/B-2 visa holders, including those who are given a year to stay as a B-1/B-2 visa holder, may have a need to access the I-94 Web site. Accordingly, CBP has revised the assumption in the economic analysis. Based on Web site query history since the interim rule went into effect, we now assume that one percent of B-1/B-2 visa holders will access the I-94 Web site. In addition, CBP agrees that some travelers may wish to obtain a record of their admission for future use. CBP has made changes to the I-94 Web site to allow travelers to access their most recent Form I-94 record as well as a five-year travel history. This can now be accessed by travelers who have already left the United States in addition to those present in the United States. Comment: Some commenters noted that CBP is assuming all travelers will have access to a printer. The commenters stated that it is not as easy as CBP assumes for a foreign national to access public libraries soon after arrival in the United States. They would have to learn that public libraries offer internet, that one can print from them, that there is a library nearby, that public transportation is available, how to navigate public transportation, and explain what library resources are needed. One commenter, the Intel Corporation, was concerned that employees would not be able to access the Web site before they must start work in the United States, which is problematic because the Form I-94 is required to complete the Form I-9. The commenter stated that it has a company policy to complete the Form I-9 during new employee orientation, which requires the employee to have his or her Form I-94 in hand. The company does not allow new hires access to company computers until after the new employee orientation, and due to data privacy protection protocol, the company cannot allow employees to access Personally Identifiable Information (PII) on a computer assigned to someone else. The commenter suggests CBP provide a way for the employer to access the new hire's Form I-94 number directly. Several commenters suggested that CBP print a copy of the departure portion for the traveler and include instructions on how to print more copies, or alternatively, that CBP provide kiosks at the airports where foreign nationals can inspect and print the Form I-94. Response: CBP recognizes that access to the internet and printers is a barrier to many travelers who need their electronic Form I-94, including those who need to present their Form I-94 when completing the Form I-9. For this reason employers, or third parties, may access Form I-94 records when consent is obtained from the record holder. For more information on third party consent visit: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/request.html. In the regulatory assessment for the interim final rule, CBP discussed the difficulties some foreign nationals face when they need to access the I-94 Web site to print their electronic Form I-94. The analysis estimated that approximately 1,028,876 travelers would need to drive 20 miles and that it would take 60 minutes of a traveler's time to access and print their electronic Form I-94. CBP estimated that this cost aliens about $21 million in 2013. We have updated these estimates for this final rule in the economic assessment. For more information, see the below section entitled Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review). CBP now estimates that it cost $17 million in 2014 (the first full year the rule is in effect). CBP acknowledges that this represents a significant negative impact to these travelers and strives to minimize this burden to the extent possible. To that end, CBP continues to provide paper Forms I-94 upon request when the individual arrives in the United States at the port's secondary inspection station and at Deferred Inspection Sites (DISs) once the traveler is in the United States. CBP recognizes the potential usefulness of placing kiosks at ports where foreign nationals could inspect and print their Forms I-94 and has evaluated the merits of placing such kiosks at the busiest 20 airports and the busiest 20 seaports. Based on this analysis, for travelers' benefits to exceed the kiosks costs, greater than one percent of the subset of travelers who would otherwise need to travel to access and print their electronic Form I-94 would instead need to use a kiosk. Based on the few travelers who currently request paper Forms I-94, CBP does not believe there are enough foreign nationals who would take advantage of the kiosks to offset CBP's costs of installing them. In addition, due to budget constraints, CBP does not have the funds to acquire these kiosks at this time. See the Regulatory Alternatives section of the economic assessment below for more information. Comment: One commenter had concerns about what a traveler would do if he or she loses his or her passport and cannot access the necessary information to retrieve the Form I-94 from the Web site. Response: CBP believes that making the Form I-94 available on the Web site will not put travelers who lose their passports in a worse position than they were in prior to the automation of the Form I-94. Paper Forms I-94 were typically stored or stapled into a traveler's passport; thus, prior to automation, loss of a passport would have required the traveler to obtain a new Form I-94 as well. With automation, if the traveler loses his or her passport, but has the passport information documented elsewhere, he or she will be able to obtain the Form I-94 from the Web site. CBP has made various updates to the I-94 Web site to address some of the comments. One of these updates is that a traveler no longer needs to enter the date and class of admission, which will make accessing the Form I-94 record easier for travelers. Comment: Many commenters encouraged CBP to make archival records of Form I-94 records available indefinitely, as this will reduce the administrative burden placed on CBP to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Response: CBP has made changes to the I-94 Web site to allow travelers to access their most recent Form I-94 record, even if the traveler has already departed the United States. Although CBP is not able to make the Form I-94 records available on the Web site indefinitely, CBP has updated the Web site so that Form I-94 records are available dating back five years. The Web site also now allows travelers to request their five-year U.S. border crossing history. Travelers frequently request their five-year travel history from DHS, as this history is often required when they apply for certain benefits. CBP agrees that providing this information through the Web site will [[Page 91651]] help reduce FOIA requests regarding travel history. More details about the benefits CBP anticipates from this change can be found in the economic assessment below, entitled ``Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review).'' Comment: One commenter asked whether nonimmigrants who received paper Forms I-94 would be able to get replacements from the Web site. Response: The Web site now provides access to Forms I-94 issued up to five years prior to the query date. Currently, nonimmigrants who have received paper Forms I-94 since 2009 are able to access their Form I-94 information via the Web site. Comment: Several commenters were concerned that foreign nationals may not be able to access their records on the Web site due to typographical or biographical errors that occur during the creation of the electronic Form I-94 record. In particular, a few commenters noted that information is frequently entered incorrectly on visas, especially incorrect name spellings. Information drawn from visas would then be incorrect, and travelers would not be successful when querying their Form I-94 record. Response: Most of the biographical information CBP uses in creating the electronic Form I-94 is drawn from the traveler's passport. The only information drawn from the visa for the Form I-94 is the visa classification and issuance date. The exact format of the name used in the electronic Form I-94 is found in the Machine Readable Zone (MRZ) of the passport, found at the bottom of the biographical page of the passport. A traveler having trouble finding his or her Form I-94 record should look at the way his or her name is formatted in the passport MRZ. The MRZ shows the traveler's name immediately following the three letter country code, as last/surname and given name separated by chevrons (<<<<). A traveler should not include the country code when querying his or her Form I-94 record. The MRZ does not use punctuation such as hyphens or apostrophes. In some cases, a traveler's name might be truncated in the MRZ; in such cases, the traveler should query the truncated version of the name. CBP has included guidance on this issue on the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site, along with an example passport page for reference. Comment: A few commenters requested that CBP ensure that the Web site is accessible on a variety of platforms and browsers, including mobile devices. Commenters also requested that both www.cbp.gov/I-94 and www.cbp.gov/I-94 [note the hyphen in I-94] direct users to the proper Web site. Response: Although CBP does not have the resources to conduct testing on multiple platforms, CBP has not received any feedback concerning a lack of functionality on any platform. Due to updates that CBP has made to www.cbp.gov as a whole, the full address for the Form I-94 retrieval Web site is now: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I-94/request.html. Both web addresses www.cbp.gov/I-94 and www.cbp.gov/I-94 direct users to a Web site with information about the Form I-94, and includes a link to the Form I-94 retrieval page. Comment: Several commenters, including AILA, ACIP, SHRM, and Feld Entertainment, suggested adding an endorsement or other information on the printout to help educate those stakeholders who are not accustomed to seeing Form I-94 printouts from the Web site, and might be reluctant to accept the printout. Some commenters also suggested including a phone number or email address on the printout. Response: CBP agrees that additional language on the printout would help educate stakeholders, and has added language to the printout indicating that the Form I-94 has now been automated for most nonimmigrants. While CBP has decided not to add a phone number or email to the printout, there is a link on the I-94 retrieval Web site that directs users to the CBP help desk. Comment: A few commenters stated that it was unclear how CBP would prevent fraudulent printouts. Response: CBP does not believe that the printout creates a greater risk of fraud than the paper Forms I-94, which did not contain any security features. CBP continues to encourage stakeholders to verify a traveler's information through SAVE or E-Verify, when registered or enrolled, respectively, in these services, and only as authorized. The SAVE program is a USCIS service that helps federal, state, and local benefit-issuing agencies, institutions, and licensing agencies determine the immigration status of benefit applicants so only those entitled to benefits receive them. More information on SAVE can be found at: http://www.uscis.gov/save. E-Verify is a web-based system that allows businesses to confirm the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States. More information on E-Verify can be found at: http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify. Comment: A few commenters had privacy concerns related to the Web site. One commenter was concerned that CBP will automatically collect information on those persons attempting to access the Form I-94 information from the Web site. Another commenter was concerned that the personal information available on the Web site could be accessed by unauthorized parties, which put refugees or those seeking asylum in the United States at risk. Response: DHS/CBP has issued a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), which describes the I-94 Web site, and posted it online at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/pia-cbp-16-I-94-automation-20130227.pdf. DHS/CBP has also updated and reissued the System of Records Notice (SORN) for the Nonimmigrant and Immigrant Information System (NIIS) at 80 FR 13398, a system for maintaining the arrival and departure records of nonimmigrants, and for APIS at 80 FR 13407. CBP is in the process of updating the PIA, which will discuss how the I-94 Web site will retain information about attempts to access the I-94 Web site (i.e. the search history) for only three months and as part of the Web site's audit log. The search history, as part of the audit log, is part of the Web site's infrastructure. The audit log is only maintained in the Web site's infrastructure, and the search history is retained for only three months, to reduce the risk of improper use or disclosure of the search history. The benefits of keeping an audit log of searches conducted on the I-94 Web site include preventing improper and unauthorized use of the Web site, and holding accountable anyone who uses the I-94 Web site improperly or without authorization. CBP believes that the benefits of having an audit log outweigh the small and limited risks of improper use and disclosure of search histories. The log of search histories allows CBP to conduct audits and uncover when an unauthorized party is attempting to obtain information from the I-94 Web site. For example, if a single access point conducts multiple searches for different individuals, CBP will investigate whether someone or something is conducting searches without the travelers' consent. CBP has included a new security consent page to the Form I-94 retrieval Web site that users must read and accept before querying an Form I-94 record. The security page requires users to affirm that they are authorized to obtain that traveler's history, and to understand [[Page 91652]] that unauthorized or improper use could result in criminal and civil penalties. With respect to information pertaining to persons whose asylee status is prohibited from public disclosure pursuant to 8 CFR 208.6, CBP is taking the added precaution of requiring asylees to manually submit verifiable identity information before they may access their Form I-94 information. Asylees will continue to receive a paper Form I-94. Refugees and certain parolees may access their Form I-94 via the Web site. Automatic Revalidation Comment: Numerous commenters were concerned about how the automation of the Form I-94 would affect automatic revalidation.\5\ Commenters noted that nonimmigrants seeking to use the automatic revalidation provisions will have to demonstrate to carriers that they are legally allowed to board the plane or vessel with an expired visa and a passport stamp that reflects a change or extension of status. Thus, commenters encourage CBP to require air and sea carriers to provide instructions to their personnel regarding the documentation for such persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Automatic revalidation allows certain persons to seek readmission to the United States for the duration of an unexpired period of a previous admission. Pursuant to 8 CFR 214.1 and 22 CFR 41.112, automatic revalidation allows readmittance of certain aliens who have been out of the United States for thirty days or less in a contiguous territory and who have an unexpired nonimmigrant visa. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specifically, commenters suggested that CBP officers would need to override a nonimmigrant's automated departure record when a nonimmigrant seeks readmission under 22 CFR 41.112(d). Commenters also recommended that CBP emphasize in training that CBP officers will be expected to reactivate previously closed Form I-94 records for automatic revalidation. Commenters were concerned that admission errors are common in automatic revalidation and that nonimmigrants without a paper Form I-94 may experience challenges during the inspection process. Commenters additionally noted that for nonimmigrants to print Forms I-94 to retain in the event they go to Canada or Mexico and wish to use the automatic revalidation provisions upon return to the United States would be very burdensome on those with limited internet and printing capabilities. Response: The IFR expanded the definition of a Form I-94 to include electronic means. It did not change the requirements for the issuance and use of the Form I-94. Automatic revalidation requirements are outlined in 8 CFR 214.1(b) and 22 CFR 41.112(d). Under the automatic revalidation provisions, certain temporary visitors holding expired nonimmigrant visas who seek to return to the United States may be admitted at a U.S. port of entry by CBP if they meet certain requirements including, but not limited to certain nonimmigrants with a valid, unexpired admission stamp on the Form I-94 or an electronic Form I-94. CBP maintains the electronic Form I-94 record in CBP systems and will use the electronic format to revalidate a previous, unexpired admission or extension of stay if all other revalidation requirements are met. CBP has provided guidance to CBP officers at POEs regarding automatic revalidation. The primary processing system allows a CBP officer to re-use an existing Form I-94 when automatic revalidation requirements are met. CBP has also conducted outreach with the travel industry about the new documentary requirements. CBP has updated the Carrier Information Guide to assist carriers in recognizing acceptable documents and to ensure that carriers are informed of the Form I-94 automation. The Carrier Information Guide now includes an example of the electronic Form I-94 Web site printout and guidance to carriers on automatic revalidation. An air carrier or vessel may require evidence of an unexpired admission by a traveler prior to embarkation. The Form I-94 Web site printout is evidence of that admission and can be presented to a carrier if requested. CBP has made changes to the I-94 Web site to allow travelers to access their Form I-94 records after departure. This allows travelers who have already departed the United States, but who may need the printout for automatic revalidation purposes to obtain the printout to present to a carrier. CBP has included guidance on automatic revalidation in the FAQs on the I-94 Web site. Departure Comment: Some commenters stated that it was unclear what procedures were to be followed at the time of departure. Commenters were particularly concerned about the procedures that should be followed in the case of a nonimmigrant arriving by air or sea but departing by land. The commenters were concerned that CBP's database would record the arrival information, but would not record the departure, which could create difficulties for nonimmigrants seeking to travel to the United States in the future. Commenters wanted to know whether nonimmigrants departing by land have any affirmative duties to ensure that departures by land are recorded correctly. Response: CBP has added information concerning departure by land to the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site. CBP and the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) have partnered to create an entry/exit system that exchanges entry information at land border ports of entry for certain individuals. Information collected on entry to one country is shared in order to electronically record as exit from the other. Thus, entry into Canada from the United States now creates a departure record for the United States. CBP does not currently have a system for automatically recording departures by land to Mexico. If a traveler departs the United States by land to Mexico, the traveler may wish to retain evidence of departure to Mexico. Evidence of departure can include, but is not limited to, entry stamps in a passport, transportation tickets, pay stubs and/or other receipts. A traveler can request an entry stamp from the Instituto Nacional de Migraci[oacute]n (INM) when entering Mexico. CBP is not, however, placing any affirmative duty on the travelers to carry such evidence. Travelers departing the United States by air or sea will have their departures recorded automatically when the air or sea carrier sends CBP departure manifests. Comment: One commenter was concerned that airlines do not always timely update their departure manifests when travelers cancel and rebook flights. Where CBP relies on carrier data, CBP might document inaccurate departure data, which could result in denial of benefits. The traveler would have no means to seek redress. Response: APIS reports whether a person is ``on board'' or ``not on board'' in order to accurately reflect changes in reservations. CBP relies on confirmed departure information, and has updated the I-94 Web site to ensure that only confirmed departures are reflected. DHS is able to independently verify departures through DHS law enforcement databases, and overstay records are reviewed before any adverse action is taken.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ According to confirmation studies conducted by CBP and outside studies conducted by contractors and GAO, CBP estimates that 99% of APIS departure data is accurate. CBP also confirms departure data independently by using information travelers send from outside the U.S., visa information from the State Department, or subsequent arrival data. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 91653]] The DHS TRIP program is an established means for a traveler to inquire to seek resolution to any difficulties experienced during travel into or departure from the United States. A traveler can submit evidence of a timely departure in DHS TRIP. If a traveler believes that CBP maintains incorrect departure information, the traveler can apply for redress at http://www.dhs.gov/dhs-trip. Visa Classification Comment: A number of commenters requested clarification on how visa classification data will populate an automated Form I-94 when a nonimmigrant has more than one visa. Response: CBP receives visa information from DOS. There may be instances where a traveler has multiple eligible visa classifications. In these cases, the CBP officer determines at the time of entry which visa classification the traveler qualifies for and admits the traveler under that class of admission. The electronic Form I-94 record will reflect the class of admission chosen by the CBP officer at the time of entry. This process is substantially the same as the process followed during issuance of a paper Form I-94. Comment: Commenters asked how nonimmigrants seeking to enter the United States from Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries would be handled in view of the Form I-94 automation. Response: Travelers entering the United States under the VWP used to receive a Form I-94W, which is different than the Form I-94. The Form I-94W was automated by the Electronic System for Traveler Authorization (ESTA) in August 2010. VWP visitors no longer receive a Form I-94W when arriving in the United States by air or sea, but rather must apply for and receive an ESTA prior to travel to the United States. For further information about ESTA, see 8 CFR 217.5 and www.cbp.gov/esta/. Upon arrival in the United States, VWP visitors receive an annotated stamp in their passports. This process is not affected by the automation of the Form I-94. Errors and CBP Officer Training Comment: A few commenters were concerned that frequently there are errors in admission records due to CBP officer error or misapplication of periods of stay for the various nonimmigrant visa categories. Commenters believe that more training is necessary for CBP officers on visa categories, automatic revalidation, and creation of the automated Form I-94. Response: CBP officers are trained in all aspects of the inspection process. CBP conducts ongoing training in the form of field guidance, musters, on-the-job training, and online training modules. CBP has provided field guidance and musters to CBP officers at the Ports of Entry (POEs) regarding the Form I-94 automation process. CBP has issued additional guidance to CBP officers to help the officers properly create the electronic Form I-94. CBP continues to instruct officers to verify information and make any needed corrections prior to creating the electronic Form I-94. Comment: Some commenters were concerned that the regulations do not require CBP to stamp the passport, and state that CBP does not currently stamp passports consistently. Thus, there is no way for some travelers to review their admission information at the time of entry. Response: It is CBP's policy to stamp the passport of visitors to the United States, or provide them a receipt, as in the case of Global Entry members.\7\ CBP has provided extensive guidance and training to CBP officers at POEs regarding the documentation of a lawful admission into the United States with a CBP admission stamp. CBP will continue to provide guidance and training to CBP officers at the POEs to ensure that officers are stamping passports consistently. CBP notes, however, that a traveler will be able to find his or her admission record on the I-94 retrieval Web site regardless of whether the passport contains an admission stamp. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Nonimmigrant Global Entry members receive a printed Form I- 94 from the Global Entry kiosk, and can also retrieve the Form I-94 from the I-94 Web site. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment: Some commenters noted that variations on naming conventions and other data occur in travel documents and records. These commenters stated that there are often variations due to inconsistent rules for transliterating non-Latin alphabets, and inconsistent rules for non-standard characters or naming conventions. The systems must be configured so that travelers are not harmed by variations in names and systems. Commenters prefer that CBP use information from the biographical page of the passport rather than information from the visa, as the visa name is often incorrect. The commenters indicated that DOS naming conventions are often not compatible with the conventions of other agencies. In particular, the First Name Unknown (FNU) or Last Name Unknown (LNU) designations create problems for nonimmigrants when the U.S. visa is used as the primary source for an official name. Response: CBP has met with USCIS, DOS, and representatives from ICE's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) to discuss naming conventions and to attempt to resolve inconsistencies. Currently, CBP creates the Form I-94 admission record using the name found in the MRZ of the passport, not the visa. APIS and CBP use standard International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) naming conventions. CBP will use FNU or LNU only when a traveler does not have both a given and surname. Comment: A few commenters suggested that CBP establish additional resources to help address questions and correct errors. Specific suggestions included creating an ombudsman for the electronic Form I- 94, creating a Web site with guidance, and establishing dedicated help lines and email addresses for use by travelers, employers, and other government agencies. Commenters were concerned that there was not a mechanism established for correcting errors in the electronic records and no access to the Web site at the time of entry into the United States. Response: Although CBP does not have the resources to create a dedicated helpline or ombudsman, CBP has included additional guidance on the I-94 Web site under the FAQs tab. Travelers can check the passport admission stamp obtained at the time of entry into the United States to verify the correct date and class of admission, and ask the CBP officer to make corrections if needed. CBP will correct any errors in Form I-94 records that originated with CBP at CBP's Deferred Inspection Sites (DISs). DISs, located at most major airports, will provide assistance to travelers requiring Form I-94 corrections or modifications. In many cases, corrections can be completed through a telephone call to a DIS. However, in some cases, the traveler may be required to appear in person in order to verify identity or to provide additional documentation to CBP. CBP has provided guidance and training to the CBP officers at the DISs about Form I-94 corrections. A list of all DISs can be found at http://www.cbp.gov/document/forms/deferred-inspection-sites. Travelers may also visit the CBP INFO Center at https://help.cbp.gov for assistance. The INFO Center has staff dedicated to responding to Form I-94 issues. CBP has included a link to the CBP INFO Center on the Form I-94 retrieval Web site. [[Page 91654]] Coordination With Other Agencies Comment: Some commenters complained of disparate guidance from various government agencies concerning the automated Form I-94. For example, some commenters stated that the SSA published guidance indicating that either an unexpired admission stamp or a printout from the Form I-94 Web site will be accepted as proof of nonimmigrant status. USCIS, however, has published guidance on its Web site stating that USCIS and state DMVs will require a printout of the Form I-94. Further, one commenter noted that at least one DMV office still required a stamp on the Form I-94 and had not heard of the change to the automated Form I-94. Response: CBP has conducted extensive outreach to other agencies and to DMVs regarding the automation of the Form I-94. The requirements of various federal and state agencies may differ for practical or legal reasons, resulting in some agencies being able to accept the admission stamp while others may still require a printout of the Form I-94. Per commenters' suggestions, CBP has added the following language on the Form I-94 printout to aid in educating stakeholders not familiar with the electronic Form I-94: Effective April 26, 2013, DHS began automating the admission process. An alien lawfully admitted or paroled into the United States is no longer required to be in possession of a preprinted Form I-94. A record of admission printed from the CBP Web site constitutes a lawful record of admission. See 8 CFR 1.4(d). Comment: Some commenters had particular concerns about completing USCIS's Form I-9, as that form requests the Form I-94 number. Commenters suggested that either the period of admission or the passport number and country of issuance serve as the required data fields on the Form I-9. Otherwise, workers without internet access will have trouble completing the Form I-9. Response: USCIS, the owner of the Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification), is reviewing its forms and applicable regulations and policies, but at this time, it is not able to change the required information on Section 1 of the Form I-9. For completion of Section 2 of Form I-9, employees who are aliens authorized for employment with a specific employer incident to their nonimmigrant status may choose to present their foreign passport together with Form I-94 in paper format (which includes a printout from the Web site); admission stamps are not acceptable for Form I-9 purposes. Refugees and asylees may also choose to present Forms I-94 for completion of Section 2 and Section 3 of the Form I-9, although they also have the option to present other documents instead. Refugees may choose to present a Form I-94 printout or a paper Form I-94 with a refugee stamp as an acceptable receipt for Form I-9 purposes that does not need to be paired with any other document. Asylees who wish to show a Form I-94 may present their paper Form I-94 as a List C document in combination with a valid List B document. Comment: A few commenters, including AILA and the Intel Corporation, were concerned that inconsistent rules regarding when a Form I-94 printout is acceptable will materially affect foreign nationals' access to employment and benefits, such as Social Security cards, driver's licenses and extensions or changes of nonimmigrant status. Commenters also said that inconsistent rules could adversely affect U.S. businesses; for example, if DHS continues to require printouts bearing an admission number, employers could be fined by DHS for failure to record this number on the Form I-9. A delay or grace period in any enforcement actions related to the I-9 regarding the entry of admission numbers is encouraged. Response: The requirements to record document numbers on Section 2 of the Form I-9 have not changed. DHS regulations require employers to record the necessary information from documents the employee presents to complete Form I-9 within three days from the date of hire. Section 1 of Form I-9 requires employees who attest to being aliens authorized to work in the United States to record either their alien number (or USCIS number) or Form I-94 admission number. Section 1 of Form I-9 must be completed by the employee at the time of hire (i.e., first day of work for pay). The Form I-94 number can be found on the Form I-94 printout; there is no requirement that the number must come from the Form I-94 itself. The timing requirements for Form I-9 completion are regulatory. DHS may provide more flexibility in the timing requirements in a future rulemaking. Employees are still required to present documents of their choice from the Lists of Acceptable Documents specified in the Form I-9 to show identity and employment authorization on Form I-9. To satisfy 8 CFR 274a.2, original documents must be presented to employers, which employers must examine to make a determination regarding whether the documents appear to be genuine and to reasonably relate to the person presenting them. According to USCIS, which issues the Form I-9, if an employee chooses to present a Form I-94 along with their foreign passport to show identity and employment authorization in Section 2 of the Form I-9, he or she will need to present to his or her employer a Form I-94 in paper format, which includes a Form I-94 printed out from the CBP Web site. If an employee provides the Form I-94 he or she obtained from the CBP Web site with his or her foreign passport as a List A document, the employer should accept these documents if they appear to be genuine and reasonably relate to the person presenting them. Form I-9 rules permit employees to present certain receipts in lieu of the original document(s): 1. A receipt for a replacement of a lost, stolen, or damaged document; 2. the arrival portion of the Form I-94 or Form I-94A containing a Temporary I-551 stamp and photograph; and 3. the departure portion of Form I-94 or I-94A with an unexpired refugee admission stamp. 8 CFR 274a.2(b). USCIS has determined that a Form I-94 printed out from the CBP Web site by a refugee is acceptable for Form I-9 purposes without an unexpired refugee admission stamp as long as the printout provides the class of admission as ``RE'' and duration of admission as ``D/S [duration of status].'' In the benefits-granting context, DHS will continue its outreach to other federal, State, and local agencies to indicate that when a Form I-94 is required as proof of valid admission to the United States, a Form I-94 in either paper or print-out format is acceptable. Comment: Commenters encouraged CBP to continue education outreach to agencies, employers, and other stakeholders that might remain unaware of the change to electronic Forms I-94. Commenters specifically urged education to improve access to and use of DHS verification tools, such as SAVE and E-Verify. Response: CBP has conducted extensive outreach to local, state, and federal agencies, scholarly organizations, and other non-governmental entities both before and after automation. CBP involved all DHS components, DOS, SSA, and the Department of Commerce in the automation process through working groups. CBP in conjunction with USCIS provided guidance and support to all major DMVs that participate in the SAVE program. CBP coordinated with NAFSA and other student organizations to inform academic institutions. CBP has met with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the travel and tourism [[Page 91655]] industry, refugee and asylum groups, local law enforcement representatives, and other interested organizations during planning and development of the electronic Form I-94. Employers seeking employment eligibility verification can do so through the E-Verify program offered by USCIS. Government agencies have access to status verification or other inquiries through a variety of sources, including law enforcement channels and the SAVE program offered by USCIS. SEVIS Comment: One commenter, NAFSA, suggested that CBP should include the SEVIS number in the electronic Form I-94 record for nonimmigrants who are monitored through SEVIS. The commenter stated that this would further DHS's fulfillment of its responsibility to notify educational institutions and exchange program sponsors that the student has been properly admitted into the United States. The commenter noted that CBP officers often write the SEVIS number on the paper Form I-94 of F and M students and J exchange visitors, and that this notation is used by Designated School Officials and Responsible Officers to ensure that the POE information is associated with the correct SEVIS record. Another commenter asked how the admission record will be tied to the proper SEVIS number, if a student has more than one SEVIS record. The commenter stated that this is of particular concern because CBP is no longer stamping the Form I-20 or DS-2019 upon entry in the United States, and there is no way that the student can make sure the correct SEVIS I-20 is getting mapped to the admission number. Response: The Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) is utilized to track and monitor schools, exchange visitor programs, and F, M and J nonimmigrants while they visit the United States and participate in the U.S. education system. The SEVIS number is the number generated when a Form I-20 or Form DS-2019 is issued to an individual to participate in a specific educational or cultural exchange program at a specific institution. CBP currently verifies SEVIS numbers prior to admission into the United States. CBP now requires officers to document SEVIS numbers, if applicable, in the electronic Form I-94 record, but these numbers are not accessible to the public or academic institution. The SEVIS number is not currently documented on the Form I-94 Web site or printout, as it is not a data element required or collected on the paper version of the Form I-94. CBP will explore the feasibility of including the SEVIS number on the Web site and printout. CBP has provided guidance to the field to include the SEVIS number on the foreign travel document with the CBP admission stamp when practical. CBP has updated its systems to help ensure that the correct SEVIS record is mapped to the proper arrival/departure record. The SEVIS information is stored in CBP systems, and the Arrival and Departure Information System (ADIS) feeds information to SEVP for each student. CBP is continuing to work to enhance its systems to do a real-time query of the SEVIS number to prevent admission on an invalid SEVIS number. Comment: One commenter requested that CBP establish a mechanism for Designated School Officials to request a review when there is a problem with a SEVIS record. Response: If there is a problem with the SEVIS record, the Designated School Official should contact SEVP, which oversees SEVIS. SEVP would then work with CBP if SEVP determines that the problem relates to the electronic Form I-94 or is otherwise CBP-related. More information about SEVIS can be found on the SEVIS Web site: www.ice.gov/sevis/. Additional Comments Comment: A few commenters requested that CBP include additional information on the tear sheet that is handed out to travelers at the POEs to include the purposes of the Form I-94 and a help line phone number or email address. Commenters stated that not all foreign nationals understand the importance of the Form I-94 or how soon they might need to print one. Response: CBP designed the tear sheet to fit into the traveler's passport and inform travelers, in 12 languages, how to access their Form I-94 records. Due to the size of the tear sheet and the desirability of including any information in multiple languages, CBP is not able to add additional information. Additionally, as the traveling public becomes more familiar with the Form I-94 automation, CBP plans to phase out distribution of the tear sheets. Comment: One commenter asked when all nonimmigrants arriving in the United States by air or sea will be processed electronically. Response: CBP rolled out the Form I-94 automation over the weeks following the effective date of the IFR, April 26, 2013. The Form I-94 automation for air and sea passengers is now complete. Comment: One commenter asked if the 11 digit admission number from the Form I-94 will continue to be used in the electronic Form I-94 format and whether it will be provided to the traveler at the time of admission. Response: The 11 digit number has not changed and will continue to be issued electronically to travelers. Travelers can use the I-94 Web site to find their Form I-94 number. Comment: One commenter was concerned about travelers having notice of the option to request a paper Form I-94 from CBP. The commenter stated that requesting a paper form is not in the regulations and it is not clear if the traveler should make the request on the plane or at the POE. Response: Travelers may request the paper form at the POE from the CBP officer. CBP has updated information on the Web site, www.cbp.gov/I94, to indicate that a paper form may be requested at the time of inspection. If someone requests a paper form, the person will be given the card stock form, properly annotated, with their electronic Form I- 94 number written on the card. Due to the extra time this process takes, issuance of a paper Form I-94 will be completed in the secondary inspection area. Conclusion Based on the analysis of the comments received, DHS is adopting the interim regulations as a final rule. In response to the comments, CBP has made some operational changes regarding the issuance of the Form I- 94 that are described below. Operational Changes to the Form I-94 Process In response to some public comments received, and after studying usage and common problems of the I-94 Web site, CBP has made some changes to the I-94 Web site since the initial rollout of the Form I-94 automation, including the addition of new features. These changes and new features are summarized below. As described in several of the comment responses, CBP believes these changes make the Web site a better resource for the public and address user concerns. First, the Web site now allows a traveler to retrieve his or her most recent Form I-94 even if he or she has departed the United States. A traveler may retrieve a Form I-94 issued up to five years prior to the request date. Second, a traveler may now retrieve his or her five-year United States border crossing history from the Web site. The border crossing history information is drawn from Form I-94 records. If a traveler has entered and departed the United States with more than one travel [[Page 91656]] document during the five years, for example an old and new passport, he or she will need to query each document to retrieve the complete five- year history. CBP expects that this update to the Web site will provide a convenient alternative to the filing of a FOIA request when a traveler needs his or her five-year border crossing history when applying for certain benefits. Third, the date and class of admission are no longer required to retrieve a Form I-94, as these data points were commonly problematic for travelers attempting to retrieve their Form I-94. This change also allows travelers to input the same information to retrieve both the Form I-94 and the travel history. Additional operational changes include a new security consent page that addresses both privacy and security issues, an endorsement added to the Form I-94 printout indicating that the Form I-94 has been automated, and updates to the FAQs page of the I-94 Web site to reflect these changes and to address additional common questions. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule is an ``economically significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget has reviewed this regulation. 1. Purpose of the Rule This rule amends the definition of the Form I-94, Arrival/Departure Record, to include an electronic format. This revision enables DHS to transition to an automated process for air and sea ports of entry whereby DHS creates a Form I-94 in an electronic format based on passenger, passport, and visa information DHS obtains electronically from air and sea carriers and the Department of State as well as through the inspection process. This rule also is consistent with CBP's transition to accepting I-94 submissions online for use at the land border. This rule results in substantial cost savings (benefits) for travelers, carriers, and CBP. CBP estimates the total net benefits to both domestic and foreign entities in 2013 ranged from $57.9 million to $82.7 million.\8\ Separately, CBP estimates a net benefit in 2013 of between $41.1 million and $65.9 million for foreign travelers, $1.3 million for carriers, and $15.5 million for CBP. Net benefits to U.S. entities (carriers and CBP) in 2013 totaled $16.8 million. In the following regulatory assessment, we present the costs and benefits to CBP, carriers, and travelers from Form I-94 automation using a six-year period of analysis beginning in year 2012. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ OMB Circular A-4 states regulatory analyses should focus on benefits and costs that accrue to citizens and residents of the United States (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/regulatory_matters_pdf/a-4.pdf; see ``Scope of Analysis'' section on page 15). In order to make this distinction clear, CBP has shown the costs and benefits to foreign travelers as well as impacts to U.S. entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Baseline Condition and Affected Parties a. Automation at the Air and Sea Ports of Entry Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule CBP published on March 27, 2013 in the Federal Register (78 FR 18457), CBP required any alien traveling to the United States, other than under the Visa Waiver Program, to complete a paper Form I-94 prior to arrival. When arriving by air and sea, the carrier provided the form to the alien while en route to the United States. The alien typically completed the form while en route to the United States, spending approximately 8 minutes filling out the form.\9\ Upon arrival at the U.S. airport or seaport, the alien presented the completed Form I-94 to the CBP officer for inspection. If permitted to enter the United States, the officer tore the form at the perforation, stamped the lower portion, and returned it to the alien. The officer sent the top portion of the form to a centralized facility where all Forms I-94 were entered into CBP's data systems. Generally, the alien later returned the lower portion of the Form I-94 to the carrier upon departure from the United States, who in turn returned it to CBP. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 78 FR 70570 (November 26, 2013) for the latest burden estimate for the Form I-94's information collection. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to acting as an arrival and departure record, the Form I-94 also serves as evidence of admission or parole into the United States for nonimmigrants. Some third parties, such as universities or local or state government benefit-granting agencies, may require an alien to present evidence of admission or parole to the United States. Prior to the interim final rule, in these cases, the alien could present the bottom portion of the Form I-94, which was returned to them when they were admitted, paroled, or adjusted to an immigration status. Aliens could also choose to present Form I-94 to establish employment eligibility and identity or eligibility for certain public benefits. If an alien loses the bottom portion of the Form I-94, he or she may file Form I-102, Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document, with USCIS to request a replacement. The form has a Paperwork Reduction Act burden of 25 minutes per form and a fee of $330. According to the USCIS, prior to the implementation of this rule, 17,700 Forms I-102 were filed each year. At the time the interim final rule was published, USCIS estimated that the rule would result in a decrease in the number of Forms I-102 filed to 8,804 in 2013 and 5,771 in later years.\10\ Following the implementation of the rule in April 2013, the total number of Forms I-102 filed in 2013 was 13,715. USCIS now expects 6,782 Forms I-102 to be filed each year.\11\ This is a reduction of 10,918 each year due to this rule. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ Communication with USCIS on February 8, 2013. \11\ Supporting Statement for Form I-102. Available at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201402-1615-001. Accessed September 28, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to the Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS),\12\ about 53.9 million aliens entered the United States using a Form I-94 or equivalent (i.e. using a Form I-94W or obtaining an electronic travel authorization when entering under the Visa Waiver Program) in 2012. Of these, about 20.3 million entered under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). These aliens do not use a Form I-94 and are therefore unaffected by this rule,\13\ so we exclude them from this analysis. Additionally, OIS figures include all modes of transportation. I-94 automation affects only aliens [[Page 91657]] arriving by air and sea, so we must exclude those arriving by land. We therefore subtract the number of aliens entering the U.S. at land border ports using a Form I-94 in 2012. According to CBP's Office of Field Operations, about 15.4 million aliens arriving from Mexico and 1.2 million arriving from Canada entered the United States at the land border using a Form I-94 in 2012. We subtract these from the admission total, leaving 16,952,996 non-VWP aliens who arrived in the U.S. by air or sea using a Form I-94 in 2012. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ 2012 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Table 28. https://www.dhs.gov/yearbook-immigration-statistics. Accessed October 26, 2016. \13\ In addition to automating the Form I-94, this final rule adds a valid, unexpired nonimmigrant DHS admission or parole stamp to the list of documents that constitute evidence of registration. Thus, such a stamp can serve as evidence of registration for Visa Waiver Program travelers and for travelers arriving by land who would otherwise be required to comply with any registration requirement under the INA. However, the addition of the passport stamp to the list of documents that constitute evidence of registration does not have an economic impact on travelers. Therefore, this analysis focuses on the changes to the Form I-94. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We next estimate the number of Form I-94 travelers to the United States in the rest of the period of analysis.\14\ For 2013 and 2014, we again use actual data from the Office of Immigration statistics. For 2015 through 2017, we use the traveler projections developed by the Office of Travel and Tourism Industries (OTTI) within the U.S. Department of Commerce.\15\ The OTTI forecasts travel growth through 2020 for the 20 countries with the highest 2014 travel volume. Since the vast majority of travelers from most countries arrive in the United States by air and sea, we assume that OTTI's travel growth rates best reflect air and sea travel growth. For Mexico and Canada, we subtract the number of Form I-94 travelers arriving by land in 2012 before applying the OTTI growth rates.\16\ We apply the OTTI projected growth rates to the number of Forms I-94 by country we obtained from OIS. For countries not separately forecasted by OTTI, we use OTTI's average growth rate for overseas travel for each year to determine overseas travel from these countries. We present the total number of projected Forms I-94 for each year from 2012-2017 absent the rule in Exhibit 1 below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 2013 and 2014 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Table 28. https://www.dhs.gov/yearbook-immigration-statistics. Accessed October 26, 2016. \15\ U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Travel and Tourism Industries ``Forecast of International Travelers to the United States by Top Origin Countries.'' October 2015. Available at http://travel.trade.gov/view/f-2000-99-001/forecast/Forecast-COUNTRIES.pdf. \16\ For the purposes of these projections, we assume that aliens arriving from Mexico and Canada at land borders are Mexican and Canadian citizens. There are a small number of citizens of other countries who enter the U.S. at land borders. Because the number for each country is small, the effect on the projections is minimal. Exhibit 1--Projected Form I-94 Respondents Traveling by Air and Sea [*denotes projection] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2012.................................................... 16,952,996 2013.................................................... 16,832,602 2014.................................................... 20,680,611 2015.................................................... 21,700,329 2016.................................................... 22,628,579 2017.................................................... 23,871,524 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ b. Electronic Implementation at the Land Border This rule affects the process of obtaining a Form I-94 for travelers arriving by air and sea and is consistent with CBP's transition to accepting I-94 submissions online for use at the land border. In addition to the automation at air and sea ports of entry, CBP modified the process by which a traveler arriving at the land border can provide Form I-94 information and pay the related fee by adding an electronic option. The enhanced I-94 Web site launched on September 29, 2016. Due to the differences in documentary requirements for land border entries, the Form I-94 issuance process varies slightly at a land border port of entry than at an air or sea port of entry. Currently when a traveler requiring a Form I-94 arrives at the land border, he/ she goes to secondary inspection where he/she provides the I-94 information to a CBP officer who inputs the data into a computer. The process takes approximately 8 minutes in addition to the time of the actual inspection. After determining the traveler's admissibility, the CBP officer then prints a Form I-94 for the traveler and refers him/her to the cashier to pay the associated $6 fee.\17\ It takes approximately 20 minutes to wait in line to pay the fee and approximately 2 minutes to pay the fee. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ The amount of fee for the issuance of the Form I-94 at a land border port of entry is provided for in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(ii)(D). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Costs We next estimate the costs and benefits of this rule for all affected parties. For the interim final rule, we assumed that the rule would go into effect on January 1, 2013. The rule actually went into effect on April 22, 2013. Because certain key data on arrivals by class of admission is only available publicly on an annual basis, we incorporate some prorated arrivals estimates into this analysis. For the purpose of this analysis, we assume that the rule went into effect on May 1, 2013 and we prorate the 2013 estimates to reflect that the rule was in effect for 8 months of the year. To the extent that travel among various classes of admission is not consistent throughout the year, the 2013 estimates may be overstated or understated. The costs of this rule are borne by both CBP and aliens traveling to the United States. a. Costs to CBP of Automation at the Air and Sea Ports of Entry This rule allows for the automation of the paper Form I-94 in the air and sea environments.\18\ Almost all of the traveler information collected on the Form I-94 prior to the implementation of this rule was redundant in the air and sea environments because CBP already obtained the same information electronically from other sources. In advance of the implementation of this rule, CBP linked its data systems to use the information from these alternate sources to create an electronic Form I-94 during the admission process. CBP creates the electronic Form I-94 by pulling information from the traveler's Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) record and any Consular Consolidated Database (CCD) record and then by entering any additional data obtained during the inspection process. This electronic process allows stakeholders that have access to CBP's databases to continue to have access to traveler information electronically. CBP's Office of Information Technology estimates the cost to link data systems and to fully automate the Form I-94 was about $1 million in calendar year 2012. In addition, it estimates the cost to develop the secure Web site was about $321,000 in 2012. CBP anticipates spending $92,000 per year in operations and maintenance costs for these systems. In total, CBP incurred costs of $1,321,000 in 2012 and will incur costs of $92,000 in following years. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ A small number of paper Forms I-94 are still being used for certain aliens such as aslyees, certain parolees, and those who request a paper Form I-94. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- b. Costs of Electronic Implementation at the Land Border CBP's Office of Information Technology estimates that it cost approximately $540,000 in 2016 to develop the Web site and create the online payment capabilities. CBP will not bear any additional costs to process travelers as a result of this process. Travelers will not face new costs or time burdens under the new optional process at the land border. Under this process, travelers will have the option to use a new CBP Web site to answer the Form I-94 questions and to pay the $6 fee in advance of travel. As the Form I-94 questions are not changing, the time burden to submit the information is not changing. Similarly, we estimate that it will take the traveler 2 minutes to pay the fee online, which is the same as the [[Page 91658]] time it takes if the traveler pays at the border, and the fee itself is not changing. c. Costs Borne by Travelers to the United States From Automation at Air and Sea Ports of Entry Although most travelers do not use the Form I-94 for any reason once they are admitted or paroled to the United States, some aliens do make use of the form to demonstrate lawful admission or parole to the United States to the Social Security Administration, universities, state agencies such as Departments of Motor Vehicles, public assistance agencies and organizations, or some other party. Aliens may also choose to present a Form I-94 to establish employment eligibility and identity, or eligibility for certain public benefits. To accommodate this need for the Form I-94, CBP has made an electronic Form I-94 available to aliens on the secure I-94 Web site. Travelers receive written information on how to access the Web site upon their arrival to the United States. Aliens may log into the Web site using 5 pieces of basic identifying information that is either known to the traveler (e.g. their first name, last/surname, and date of birth) or readily available on their passport (e.g. passport number, country of issuance). CBP estimates that it takes the traveler 4 minutes to log into the Web site using identifying information and to print the electronic form. This is less time than the paper Form I-94's 8 minute time burden for entering 17 data elements. This 4 minute estimate does not include the time it takes to travel to a location with computer and internet access; that cost is treated separately later in this section. In addition, CBP makes the paper Form I-94 available to certain classes of aliens and upon request at the secondary inspection station at ports of entry and at CBP Deferred Inspection Sites (DIS), which are located at most ports of entry and are largely open during regular business hours. Since the interim final rule went into effect, very few travelers have requested the paper form. To estimate the costs to travelers to access their Form I-94 electronically, we must first determine the number of aliens who access the Web site, the number who do not have ready access to the internet, the distance they have to travel to access the internet, and the average wage rate for all aliens entering the United States by air or sea. First, we assess the number of aliens who access the Web site. Exhibit 2 shows the number of travelers who entered the United States by air or sea in 2012 sorted by various categories of admission.\19\ The majority of Form I-94 visitors to the United States--about 76 percent--are tourists and business travelers entering on B-1/B-2 visas. In most cases, these travelers do not have a need for their Form I-94 now that the passport stamp serves as evidence of alien registration. While in the U.S., these B-1/B-2 visa travelers may use their foreign driver's license, so there is generally no need for them to apply for a U.S. driver's license. They are ineligible for employment or enrollment in a university while traveling on a B-1/B-2 visa. They are generally not eligible for public benefits without a change in status. For these reasons, for the analysis for the interim final rule, we assumed that no B-1/B-2 visa holders would need to access the Web site to obtain their electronic Form I-94. However, public comments stated that some B-1/B-2 travelers do in fact need their Form I-94. According to the Web site's query history, approximately 1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers access the Web site.\20\ Therefore, for this analysis, we assume that 1 percent of these travelers will continue to access the Web site in the future. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ CBP analysis of data from 2012 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Table 28. http://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/yearbook.shtm. Accessed June 4, 2014. \20\ Communication with CBP's Office of Field Operations on June 10, 2014. Exhibit 2--2012 Air and Sea Form I-94 Respondents by Class of Admission * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Number Percentage ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tourists and Business Travelers (B-1/B- 12,938,329 76.3 2)..................................... Temporary workers....................... 1,631,683 9.6 Students................................ 1,594,816 9.4 Other/Unknown........................... 461,935 2.7 Diplomats............................... 326,233 1.9 ------------------------------- Total............................... 16,952,996 .............. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Estimates may not total due to rounding. Because so many parties at various levels of government and outside of the government use the Form I-94, prior to the implementation of the interim final rule CBP could not estimate the number of non-B-1/B-2 travelers that would access the Web site. For the analysis of the interim final rule, we assumed that all travelers, other than B-1/B-2 travelers, who previously received a paper Form I-94 would log into the Web site to print off their electronic Form I-94. According to the Web site's query history since the implementation of the interim final rule, approximately 75 percent of non-B-1/B-2 travelers access the Web site. Exhibit 3 shows the number of travelers we estimate will access their electronic Form I-94 via the CBP Web site during the period of analysis. We note that those with a need for a Form I-94 who face obstacles to accessing their Form I-94 electronically may request a paper Form I-94 at the secondary inspection station upon their arrival at the port or at a DIS during their stay in the United States. However, according to CBP subject matter experts, very few aliens have requested paper Forms I-94 at the ports of entry and those who have requested them at DIS have done so primarily to correct erroneous information on their electronic Form I-94. Exhibit 3--Estimated Travelers Needing to Access Electronic Form I-94 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B-1/B-2 Other * Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012............................................................ 0 0 0 [[Page 91659]] 2013 **......................................................... 85,622 1,994,663 2,080,285 2014............................................................ 157,793 3,675,979 3,833,772 2015............................................................ 165,574 3,857,233 4,022,807 2016............................................................ 172,656 4,022,230 4,194,886 2017............................................................ 182,140 4,243,163 4,425,303 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Other includes temporary workers, students, diplomats, and others/unknowns. ** 2013 travelers are estimated based on the rule being in effect for two thirds (8 months) of the year. We next estimate the number of aliens who do not have ready access to the internet while in the United States and would need to travel to access their electronic Form I-94. We assume that students and diplomats have ready access to the internet at their schools or places of business respectively. The 1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers who access their electronic Form I-94 typically need it when staying in the United States for over 6 months. These people likely have other uses for the internet during their stay and could access their electronic Form I-94 when using the internet for another purpose. Therefore, we assume they do not need to travel to access their electronic Form I-94. Also, as noted above, CBP will continue to make the paper Form I-94 available upon request at the secondary inspection station at ports of entry or at DIS to those with a need for a Form I-94 and who face obstacles to accessing their electronic Form I-94. Temporary workers come to the United States for varying lengths of time to fill positions where there is a shortage of labor in the United States. These positions can be in very highly technical occupations, such as computer programming, but they can also be in less technical occupations such as agricultural labor. Because this category of admission includes such a wide range of workers, we cannot say with certainty that all temporary workers have ready access to the internet while in the United States. Similarly, we do not know how accessible the internet is for those in the ``Other/ Unknown'' category. The aliens least likely to have internet access are those working as temporary agricultural laborers. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), approximately 67 percent of farms have internet access.\21\ The primary use for the electronic Form I-94 for these temporary workers is to demonstrate employment eligibility to their employers. Generally, this document will be the only acceptable evidence of employment authorization that such workers will have to satisfy the Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) requirements. Because of the Form I-9 requirements, many employers do not allow their employees to begin working for pay until the workers have presented them with the print- out of their electronic Form I-94. The employers have spent a considerable amount of money bringing these foreign workers to the United States to work. By offering internet access to employees, employees and employers can complete the employment eligibility verification process timely, which allows the employee to begin working sooner. Because this incremental use of the internet is virtually costless to the employer and the employer would benefit from their employee's prompt access to their electronic Form I-94, we assume that employers with internet access allow their employees to use their internet connection to access their electronic Forms I-94.\22\ As stated previously, 67 percent of farms have internet access. For the purposes of this analysis, we assume that 33 percent (100 percent-67 percent) of travelers in the ``Temporary Workers'' and ``Other/ Unknown'' categories (for example, 690,894 in 2012) would need to travel to access their electronic Form I-94. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. ``Farm Computer Usage and Ownership.'' August 2013. Available at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FarmComp/FarmComp-08-20-2013.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014. \22\ It is also possible that some employers without internet access help transport their employees to a location with internet access. Employers have expended considerable effort to sponsor temporary workers and they may view this as part of the cost of using foreign temporary workers. However, as the burden of demonstrating employment eligibility is on the worker, we assume that the worker must bear any travel costs to obtain their electronic Form I-94. To the extent that the employer is able to provide more efficient access to the internet, costs to workers will be lower. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP received several public comments regarding the ability of travelers to obtain their printed electronic Form I-94 before they need it. One employer of temporary workers commented that according to their company policy, employees cannot use company computers to access the internet until they have demonstrated their legal admission to the United States by presenting a copy of their Form I-94. While CBP believes that most employers with internet access allow their employees to use a company computer to access their Form I-94, we acknowledge that a small number of employers may choose not to do so, or company policy may prohibit non-employees from accessing company equipment. These travelers are included in the 33 percent of temporary workers who we assume have to travel to access the internet. One commenter noted that employees sometimes need to start work very soon after arrival and do not have time to travel to a location where they can print their electronic Form I-94. Once again, CBP notes that any traveler, but particularly travelers with an immediate need for their Form I-94 may request a paper Form I-94 at the secondary inspection station at ports of entry or at CBP DIS. Another commenter said that travelers often do not know they need a Form I-94 until after they have left the airport, so requesting a paper Form I-94 at the port is not a practical option. CBP acknowledges that many people may not know that they need their Form I-94 until it is asked of them. As such, CBP has made access to the I-94 Web site as easy as possible and will continue to provide paper Forms I-94 upon request at CBP DIS. Another commenter suggested that CBP provide kiosks at the ports of entry where travelers could print their electronic Form I-94 prior to leaving the airport. CBP has explored the possibility of placing kiosks at the largest airports and seaports to give travelers the opportunity to print their Form I-94 prior to leaving the port of entry. CBP has determined that the benefits to the public do not outweigh the cost to CBP, so it is not proceeding with kiosks at this time. See the Regulatory Alternatives section for more information. Now that we have estimated the number of aliens who do not have ready access to the internet, we need to [[Page 91660]] develop an assumption for how long it takes to travel to a location where they can access the internet. Based on our online review of internet services provided by public libraries, we found that virtually all public libraries provide public access to computers and the internet, though many charge a nominal fee for printing. There are 16,766 public libraries in the United States.\23\ According to the Department of Education, 94 percent of households live within 10 miles of a public library and 83 percent live within 5 miles of one.\24\ Given the large number of library locations nationwide that provide access to the internet and the fact that CBP makes the paper Form I-94 available upon request at ports and DIS, we believe most aliens who travel to access the internet to print their electronic Form I-94 only need to travel a short distance to do so. We estimate that round-trip distance required to access a computer terminal and printing station at a public library is 20 miles. We also assume that traveling to and from a library takes 60 minutes of an aliens' time, which includes travel time and the time to enter the library, locate an available computer, wait to access the computer and print a Form I-94. In this analysis, we assume that users pay $0.25 to print their electronic Form I-94 based on a review of available online printing fees charged at public libraries. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ American Library Association. ``Quotable Facts about America's Libraries.'' September 2012. http://www.ala.org/offices/ola/quotablefacts/quotablefacts/. Accessed Jun 13, 2014. \24\ Department of Education: Households' Use of Public and Other Types of Libraries: 2002. Derived from Table 19. Available at https://harvester.census.gov/imls/pubs/Publications/2007327.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We next estimate the value of time for those travelers affected by this rule. Federal agencies typically estimate a monetary value of time used or saved as a result of their regulatory actions. This allows agencies to estimate the additional costs and benefits of their regulatory actions on affected parties. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) provides guidance on the value of time to use for economic analysis.\25\ This guidance provides point estimates as well as ranges for values of time for travelers based on average wage rate analysis for different categories of travel. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ U.S. Department of Transportation: ``Revised Departmental Guidance on Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis.'' September 28, 2011. Table 5. Available at http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/vot_guidance_092811c.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to DOT estimates, the value of travel time is more than twice as high for air travelers than for those traveling by surface modes, which can be explained by the relatively high cost of air travel. We note that the DOT estimates are intended to be used to analyze actions that will reduce the time spent traveling. A person's value of time while traveling may differ from their value of reducing travel time. In most instances, this rule does not reduce the time spent traveling because an alien typically completes the Form I-94 while en route to the United States, but rather reduces the time spent on paperwork while traveling. The traveler is now able to spend this time on leisure or business activities such as reading or drafting documents. CBP believes that using the DOT values of travel time in this situation is the most appropriate estimate because it reflects the higher values of time for air travelers. Further, we note that to the extent a person's value of time while traveling is different than their value of reducing travel time, this difference is likely encompassed in the DOT plausible range for the value of travel time. The DOT estimates are in 2009 dollars, but the DOT provides a methodology to inflate its estimates for future years. We have inflated the estimates to 2012 dollars, which is the first year of our period of analysis.\26\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ To determine the hourly value of travel time savings in 2012 U.S. dollars, we applied the DOT's suggested growth rate of 1.6 percent per year to the hourly time values listed in 2009 U.S. dollars. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As a primary estimate, we use the DOT's point estimate for the value of time for all-purpose air travel, which includes both personal and business travel. This point estimate is $44.15, when inflated to 2012 dollars. We also use the DOT's range for all-purpose travel to show a range of low and high estimates. This range is from $36.50 to $54.75 when inflated to 2012 dollars. We apply these low, primary, and high values of time to the travelers in our analysis. We use this travel value of time framework to estimate the costs and savings of this rule, since affected aliens previously completed the paper Form I- 94 while traveling. We recognize that those who must travel to access the internet are a special case of travelers and probably have different values of time than the average air traveler. As previously discussed, the aliens least likely to have internet access are those working as temporary agricultural laborers. To estimate the value of time for these aliens, we use the wage rate for H-2A seasonal (temporary) agricultural workers. According to the Department of Labor, H-2A temporary agricultural workers have an average wage rate of 9.79 per hour.\27\ We recognize that there are other classes of temporary workers, notably H-1B visa holders, who likely have higher wage rates; however, these workers are predominantly in specialized occupations such as medicine and computer programming and are likely to have ready access to the internet. Employers of these employees have an incentive to provide this access as it is virtually costless and would allow workers to start working earlier. We note that, notwithstanding the benefits to the employer of providing this access, we received public comments indicating that some employers of H-1B employees may not allow their workers to access computers to print their electronic Form I-94. CBP does not believe this represents a large number of employers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ Calculated from the Office of Foreign Labor Certification's FY 2012 Annual Report using the weighted average of state average wage rates. Available at: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/OFLC-2012_Annual_Report-11-29-2013-Final%20Clean.pdf. Accessed on June 16, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, workers in occupations such as medicine and computer programming are likely to have internet access from other sources, such as their hotel or other place of lodging. Finally, as discussed above, we have assumed that all temporary workers would access their electronic Form I-94 and that 33 percent of them would have to travel to do so. Any H-1B worker who must travel to access their electronic Form I-94 is included in these estimates. But because we do not believe the H-1B workers make up a large portion of the temporary workers who must travel to access their electronic Form I-94, we use the estimated wage of H-2A workers as our estimate for the value of time for those who must travel to access their electronic Form I-94. Now that we have estimated the number of aliens who log into CBP's Web site to print their electronic Form I-94, the time it takes to access that Web site, the number of people who need to travel to access the internet, the time it takes to travel to and from an internet access site, and the values of time for these groups, we can calculate this rule's cost to these travelers. We first address the cost to log into CBP's electronic Form I-94 Web site. Once again, CBP estimates that it takes travelers 4 minutes to access and print their electronic Form I-94, and that it costs them $0.25 per page to print their electronic Form I-94. Exhibit 4 shows the 2013 to 2017 travelers' costs for accessing and printing their electronic Forms I-94.\28\ As shown, in 2013, [[Page 91661]] traveler costs of time to access electronic Forms I-94 and their cost to print them ranged from $5.5 million to $8.1 million with a primary estimate of $6.6 million. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ The annual estimates of Forms I-94 in Exhibit 4 are based on projections for all visa categories using growth rate estimates developed OTTI. We adjust these estimates using our assumptions that 1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers and 75 percent of non-B-1/B-2 travelers access the I-94 Web site. Exhibit 4--Traveler Costs of Time to Access and Cost to Print Electronic Form I-94 [Undiscounted 2012$] * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forms I-94............................................... 2,080,285 3,833,772 4,022,807 4,194,886 4,425,303 DOT--Low ($)............................................. 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 DOT--Primary ($)......................................... 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15 DOT--High ($)............................................ 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75 Time Cost--Low ($)....................................... 5,061,648 9,328,146 9,788,098 10,206,792 10,767,432 Time Cost--Primary ($)................................... 4,730,513 8,147,564 7,990,003 7,786,713 7,677,030 Time Cost--High ($)...................................... 4,914,222 8,792,673 8,957,496 9,068,603 9,288,081 Printing Cost ($)........................................ 520,071 958,443 1,005,702 1,048,722 1,106,326 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Cost--Low ($).................................. 5,581,720 10,286,589 10,793,800 11,255,514 11,873,758 Total Cost--Primary ($).............................. 6,643,502 12,243,356 12,847,050 13,396,594 14,132,443 Total Cost--High ($)................................. 8,112,544 14,950,663 15,687,848 16,358,910 17,257,474 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. We next address the travel costs for those aliens who do not have ready access to the internet. Once again, we assume that 33 percent of travelers in the ``Temporary Workers'' and ``Other/Unknown'' categories (approximately 12 percent of the total, see exhibit 2) would need to travel 20 miles roundtrip and spend 60 minutes of time to access their electronic Form I-94. We also assume that these travelers have a value of time best characterized by the average H-2A wage rate of $9.79 per hour. For the cost of travel, we use the 2012 IRS standard mileage rate for business travel of $0.555 per mile.\29\ Exhibit 5 shows the 2013 to 2017 aliens' travel costs to access the internet. As shown we estimate that the total travel costs were $9.3 million in 2013. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ Internal Revenue Service. IR-2011-116, December 9, 2011. Available at http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=250882,00.html. Exhibit 5--Travel Costs * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Affected Aliens................. 444,381 818,952 859,333 896,092 945,312 H2A Wage Rate ($)............... 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 Time Cost ($)................... 4,350,487 8,017,542 8,412,870 8,772,738 9,254,608 Mileage Cost ($)................ 4,932,626 9,090,369 9,538,597 9,946,618 10,492,967 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Travel Cost ($)........... 9,283,113 17,107,912 17,951,467 18,719,357 19,747,575 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. Undiscounted dollars. To summarize, both CBP and aliens bear costs as a result of this rule. CBP bore the costs to link its data systems and to build a Web site so aliens can access their electronic Forms I-94. CBP continues to incur annual costs to operate and maintain the I-94 Web site. Temporary workers and aliens in the ``Other/Unknown category (see Exhibit 2) bear costs when logging into the Web site, traveling to a location with public internet access and printing a paper copy of their electronic Form I-94. The costs averaged $24.08 per traveler in 2013 for those in the temporary worker and ``Other/Unknown'' categories who have to travel to access their electronic Form I-94. Aliens arriving as B-1/B-2 travelers, diplomats, students, and those temporary workers and aliens in the ``Other/Unknown'' category who do not need to travel to access their Form I-94 bear costs when logging into the Web site and printing electronic Forms I-94. Using the primary estimate for a traveler's value of time, these costs for these groups averaged $3.19 per person. Exhibit 6 summarizes the 2012-2017 costs of this rule. As shown, costs for this rule in 2013 ranged from $15.0 million to $17.5 million. In our primary estimate, costs for this rule are $16.0 million in 2013. Less than one percent of these costs are incurred by the U.S. entities. These are CBP's costs for automating the electronic Form I-94 and developing the Web site travelers use to access their electronic Form I-94. In 2013, CBP's costs were $92,000. Exhibit 6--Cost Summary [Undiscounted 2012$] * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP Costs I-94 Air/Sea Systems Costs.............................. 1,321,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 [[Page 91662]] I-94 Land Systems Costs................................. .............. .............. .............. .............. 540,000 0 Total CBP Costs......................................... 1,321,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 632,000 92,000 Traveler Costs Website Access Costs--Low............................... 0 5,061,648 9,328,146 9,788,098 10,206,792 10,767,432 Website Access Costs--Primary........................... 0 6,123,431 11,284,913 11,841,348 12,347,872 13,026,117 Website Access Costs--High.............................. 0 7,592,473 13,992,220 14,682,147 15,310,188 16,151,148 Travel Time Costs....................................... 0 4,350,487 8,017,542 8,412,870 8,772,738 9,254,608 Mileage Costs........................................... 0 4,932,626 9,090,369 9,538,597 9,946,618 10,492,967 Printing Costs.......................................... 0 520,071 958,443 1,005,702 1,048,722 1,106,326 Total Traveler Costs--Low........................... 0 14,864,832 27,394,501 28,745,266 29,974,870 31,621,333 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Traveler Costs--Primary....................... 0 15,926,615 29,351,267 30,798,517 32,115,950 33,880,018 Total Traveler Costs--High.......................... 0 17,395,656 32,058,574 33,639,315 35,078,266 37,005,049 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grand Total Costs--Low.......................... 1,321,000 14,956,832 27,486,501 28,837,266 30,606,870 31,713,333 Grand Total Costs--Primary...................... 1,321,000 16,018,615 29,443,267 30,890,517 32,747,950 33,972,018 Grand Total Costs--High......................... 1,321,000 17,487,656 32,150,574 33,731,315 35,710,266 37,097,049 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. 4. Benefits a. Benefits of Automation at Air and Sea Ports of Entry This rule has benefits for CBP, carriers, and travelers to the United States. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, CBP returned the bottom portion of the Form I-94 to the traveler and retained the top portion of the form. The information on the top portion of the form was entered into CBP systems for use by CBP and other agencies. CBP also received this information electronically from other sources. In 2012, CBP linked its data systems to create an electronic Form I-94, thus eliminating the need to continue entering the data from the paper Form I-94 for air and sea travelers into CBP systems. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, CBP spent approximately $17.8 million per year on contract support for manual Form I-94 data entry. CBP still must spend approximately $2.4 million in contract expenses to enter data from the paper Forms I-94 collected at the land border and the few that continue to be collected at airports and seaports. We therefore estimate that this rule saves CBP $15.4 million each year in contract costs. It is possible that these savings could grow in future years if large numbers of travelers at the land border opt for the voluntary electronic option. CBP processing has also become more efficient as a result of this rule. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, when the traveler gave the completed Form I-94 to the CBP officer during the inspection, the officer reviewed the form for errors and made corrections as needed. The officer then stamped the top and bottom portions of the form with the admission or parole stamp, notated the alien's classification and duration of admission or parole and stapled it to the traveler's passport. The interim final rule eliminated this process. A study of the processing times at three major U.S. airports immediately following the implementation of the interim final rule yielded mixed results; one airport showed a decrease in processing time following the change in process, another showed an increase, and the third showed no statistically significant difference in processing times. We note that CBP has since resolved some technical issues with the user interface design of the system used by CBP officers during primary inspection that arose with the automated process. CBP has anecdotal evidence that processing times have now dropped nationwide as a result of the transition to the automated Form I-94 process. CBP is conducting a more comprehensive time study that will examine the entire time period following the implementation of the automated process, but results of this study are not yet available. Accordingly, for the purposes of this analysis, we assume that this rule will not affect CBP processing times. To the extent that eliminating the paper Form I-94 reduced processing times, CBP was able to focus its resources on other areas, improving security and expediting the processing of passengers. We next examine the printing savings this rule generates for CBP and carriers. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, both CBP and carriers printed and stored Forms I-94. CBP printed forms for use in primary and secondary passenger inspections when the traveler did not fill out a form in advance or when the traveler made an error in filling out the form. Prior to this rule, CBP spent $153,360 each year printing the Form I-94 for air and sea travelers. Since the interim final rule's implementation, CBP no longer needs to print the Form I-94 for most of these travelers,\30\ which eliminates this expense. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ CBP still prints a small number of forms for use at airports and seaports for certain aliens such as asylees, certain parolees, and those who request a paper Form I-94. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Before the implementation of the interim final rule, carriers printed the Forms I-94 for their passengers to complete before their arrival in the United States. To estimate printing costs for carriers, CBP obtained an estimate of total Form I-94 printing and storage costs from a major airline. We increased this cost proportionally based on annual international inbound passenger volumes to estimate the entire industry's cost to print and store paper Forms I-94. Based on this methodology, CBP estimates that carriers spent $1,344,450 annually to print and store the Form I-94. Since the interim final rule's implementation, carriers no longer need to print or store the Form I- 94, which eliminates these expenses. We next estimate the value of air and sea travelers' time savings resulting from the elimination of the paper Form I-94. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, travelers spent 8 minutes filling out the Form I-94 while in transit to the United States. This rule eliminates the paper Form I-94 for air and sea travelers and, with it, the 8- [[Page 91663]] minute time burden.\31\ We again apply the DOT range of plausible values of time for air travelers, as well as their point estimate for this value, to these aliens to determine the time savings from the Form I-94 automation. Exhibit 7 shows the 2013 to 2017 travelers' reduction in time burden resulting from no longer needing to fill out the paper Form I-94. As shown, in 2013, the value of the reduction in time burden ranged from $54.6 million to $81.9 million. In our primary estimate, the reduction in time burden was $66.1 million in 2013. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ For those with a need to access their electronic Form I-94, this burden relief is partially offset by the 4 minute time burden to access the Web site. The costs for this access are discussed in the costs section above. Exhibit 7--Reduction in Time Burden* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forms I-94............................................... 11,221,734 20,680,611 21,700,329 22,628,579 23,871,524 DOT--Low ($)............................................. 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 DOT--Primary ($)......................................... 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15 DOT--High ($)............................................ 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75 Benefit--Low ($)......................................... 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058 Benefit--Primary ($)..................................... 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225 Benefit--High ($)........................................ 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. We next examine the savings to aliens who need a replacement Form I-94. Prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, if aliens lost the bottom portion of their Form I-94, they could file Form I-102, Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document, with USCIS to request a replacement. The form has a Paperwork Reduction Act burden of 25 minutes per response and a fee of $330. As stated earlier, prior to the implementation of the interim final rule, 17,700 Forms I-102 were filed annually. In 2013, 13,715 Forms I-102 were filed and USCIS expects 6,782 to be filed each year starting in 2014, a reduction of 10,918 each year due to this rule. Now these travelers are able to access their electronic Form I-94, which saves these individuals 25 minutes and $330.\32\ We calculate the value of this time savings using USCIS's hourly wage estimate for Form I-102 filers of $30.74.\33\ Exhibit 8 shows the time and fee cost savings for those who would otherwise have needed to file a Form I-102 from 2013 to 2017. As shown, in 2013 the value of this time and fee savings was $1.4 million. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ As discussed in the costs section, we estimate a 4 minute time burden for travelers who need to access their electronic Form I-94. See the cost section for a complete discussion of the costs of accessing the Web site as well as the cost to travel to a location where they can access the Web site, where necessary. \33\ USCIS estimates are based on U.S. Bureau of Labor data for occupational employment statistics. The latest supporting statement for the I-102 is available at: http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201206-1615-003. Accessed June 4, 2014. This supporting statement uses a wage estimate of $30.74. Exhibit 8--I-102 Cost Savings * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I-102 Reduction.......................................... 3,985 10,918 10,918 10,918 10,918 Time Burden.............................................. 25 25 25 25 25 USCIS hourly wage ($).................................... 30.44 30.44 30.44 30.44 30.44 Time Savings ($)......................................... 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841 Fee Savings ($).......................................... 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Savings ($).................................... 1,366,091 3,742,781 3,742,781 3,742,781 3,742,781 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. Undiscounted dollars. Following the enactment of the interim final rule, travelers could only access their current electronic Form I-94 until they departed the United States. In response to public comments on the interim final rule, CBP has enhanced the Web site to allow travelers to access their most recent Form I-94 for 5 years from the date of issuance. In addition, the Web site now provides foreign travelers with a 5 year record of their travel history. Doing so has reduced Freedom of Information Act requests received by CBP by approximately 2 percent. Accessing the information via the Web site can be done within minutes rather than the months it can take to receive information from a FOIA request, which is a benefit to the traveler. In addition, this saves the CBP FOIA office time, which it can spend processing other FOIA requests. CBP is exploring whether it can expand the Web site to include travel history dating back farther than 5 years. CBP is also considering whether the Web site can be set up to include travel history for non-Form I-94 users such as U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents. CBP estimates that expanding the travel history past 5 years has reduced the number of FOIA requests received by approximately 6 percent and expanding it to include travel history for U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents will reduce FOIA requests by an additional 20 percent. In summary, CBP, carriers, and aliens accrue benefits as a result of this rule. CBP saves on contract and printing costs as well as FOIA processing burdens. Carriers save on printing costs. All aliens save the 8 minute time burden for filling out the paper Form I-94 and certain aliens who lose their Form I-94 save the $330 fee and 25 minute time burden for filling out the Form I-102; and, certain aliens save processing time from the elimination of the FOIA process. Because we only expect one percent of B-1/B-2 travelers to use the Web site to access their electronic Form I-94, the benefits associated with the [[Page 91664]] Form I-102 accrue primarily to non-B-1/B-2 travelers. Using the primary estimate for a traveler's value of time, the time burden savings for all travelers is $5.89 per traveler. In addition, those non-B-1/B-2 travelers who no longer need to use a Form I-102 would achieve an additional time and fee savings of $343.81 per traveler. Exhibit 9 summarizes the benefits of air and sea automation to each party. As shown, total benefits for this rule ranged from $72.9 million to $100.2 million in 2013. In our primary estimate, the benefits of this rule were $84.3 million in 2013. Exhibit 9--Benefit Summary [Undiscounted 2012$] * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP Benefits: CBP Contract Savings........ 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 CBP Printing Savings........ 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 Total CBP Benefits.............. 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 Carrier Printing Savings........ 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 Traveler Benefits: Form I-94 Time Savings--Low. 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058 Form I-94 Time Savings-- 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225 Primary.................... I-94 Time Savings--High..... 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087 Form I-102 Time Savings..... 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841 Form I-102 Fee Savings...... 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 Total Traveler Benefits--Low.... 55,974,446 104,380,892 109,343,146 113,860,294 119,908,839 Total Traveler Benefits--Primary 67,429,647 125,491,760 131,494,947 136,959,658 144,277,007 Total Traveler Benefits--High... 83,278,624 154,699,947 162,143,329 168,919,051 177,991,868 Grand Total Benefits--Low....... 72,872,256 121,278,702 126,240,956 130,758,104 136,806,649 Grand Total Benefits--Primary... 84,327,457 142,389,570 148,392,757 153,857,468 161,174,817 Grand Total Benefits--High...... 100,176,434 171,597,757 179,041,139 185,816,861 194,889,678 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. b. Benefits From Electronic Implementation at the Land Border Under the new voluntary electronic I-94 submission process at the land border, once the traveler arrives at the port, he/she will go through secondary inspection, as they do under the paper process, where the CBP officer will locate the traveler's information through a document swipe in CBP's database. This will indicate that the fee was paid and pre-populate the data fields from the document swipe and the information provided by the traveler in the Web site. Once the CBP officer has determined the traveler's admissibility, the CBP officer will print out a paper I-94 to give to the traveler. The traveler will already have paid the fee, so once he/she has cleared the secondary inspection he/she will be able to enter the United States. This voluntary process is purely beneficial to any traveler who opts into it. By paying the fee online, the traveler avoids an average 20 minute wait to do so at the port of entry. Using our primary estimate for the value of travel time of $44.15, the value of this time savings is $14.72 per traveler. As this process is just a few months old, CBP does not have data on how many travelers will opt to answer the Form I-94 questions and pay the fee online. CBP is engaging in public outreach to notify the public of the option, but only travelers who have access to a computer or other device with internet connectivity will be able to participate. In 2015, nearly 7 million travelers arrived in the United States at the land border using a Form I-94. CBP does not yet have sufficient data on how many travelers will opt for the online fee payment option. For the purposes of this analysis, CBP estimates that 5 percent of these travelers, or approximately 350,000, will opt for the advance I-94 information submission and payment process, for a total savings to travelers of $5,152,000. To the extent that the reduction in CBP officer time inputting data and processing fees results in shorter wait times, travelers would have additional time savings benefits. This process would save CBP 8 minutes of data input time and 2 minutes of fee processing time, a total of 10 minutes of CBP officer time per traveler. Based on the estimate that 350,000 travelers will opt for the advance I-94 information submission and payment, and using the fully loaded wage rate of a CBP Officer of $85.47 per hour,\34\ we estimate that this process would save CBP officers 58,333 hours and $4,985,750. We note that this is a time savings that is monetized for analytical purposes and not a budgetary savings. This time savings could be spent on other priorities including reducing wait times. In addition, this rule would reduce the amount of cash being handled at ports of entry, which would simplify port of entry oversight and auditing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ Source: CBP Position Model. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- c. Aggregate Benefits Exhibit 10 shows the total benefits of the rule--both the benefits of air and sea automation and the land border implementation. Exhibit 10--Benefit Summary [Undiscounted 2012$] * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP Benefits: CBP Contract Savings........ 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 CBP Printing Savings........ 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 [[Page 91665]] CBP Time Savings............ 0 0 0 1,246,438 4,985,750 Total CBP Benefits.............. 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 16,799,798 20,539,110 Carrier Printing Savings........ 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 Traveler Benefits: Form I-94 Time Savings--Low. 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058 Form I-94 Time Savings-- 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225 Primary.................... I-94 Time Savings--High..... 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087 Form I-102 Time Savings..... 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841 Form I-102 Fee Savings...... 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 Land Process Time Savings... 0 0 0 1,288,000 5,152,000 Total Traveler Benefits--Low.... 55,974,446 104,380,892 109,343,146 115,148,294 125,060,839 Total Traveler Benefits--Primary 67,429,647 125,491,760 131,494,947 138,247,658 149,429,007 Total Traveler Benefits--High... 83,278,624 154,699,947 162,143,329 170,207,051 183,143,868 Grand Total Benefits--Low....... 72,872,256 121,278,702 126,240,956 133,292,542 146,944,399 Grand Total Benefits--Primary... 84,327,457 142,389,570 148,392,757 156,391,905 171,312,567 Grand Total Benefits--High...... 100,176,434 171,597,757 179,041,139 188,351,298 205,027,428 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. 5. Net Benefits Exhibit 11 compares the costs of this rule to the benefits, both in total and for each party affected. As shown, in 2013, CBP had a net benefit of $15.5 million, carriers had a net benefit of $1.3 million, and travelers had a net benefit of between $41.1 and $65.9 million. In our primary analysis, the net benefit to travelers was $51.3 million in 2013. Total 2013 net benefits ranged from $57.9 million to $82.7 million. In our primary analysis, the total net benefits were $68.3 million in 2013. Exhibit 11--Net Benefits [Undiscounted 2012$] * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 15,461,360 15,461,360 15,461,360 16,167,798 20,447,110 Carriers................................................ 0 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 41,109,614 76,986,391 80,597,880 85,173,424 93,439,507 Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 51,503,032 96,140,493 100,696,430 106,131,707 115,548,989 Travelers--High......................................... 0 65,882,967 122,641,373 128,504,014 135,128,784 146,138,820 Grand Total--Low........................................ -1,321,000 57,915,424 93,792,201 97,403,690 102,685,671 115,231,067 Grand Total--Primary.................................... -1,321,000 68,308,842 112,946,303 117,502,240 123,643,955 137,340,549 Grand Total--High....................................... -1,321,000 82,688,777 139,447,183 145,309,824 152,641,032 167,930,380 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. Exhibits 12 and 13 present the present value net benefits of this rule, discounted at the 3 and 7 percent discount rates. Exhibit 14 presents annualized net benefits at the 3 and 7 percent discount rates. Total annualized net benefits range from $73.4 million to $111.8 million. In the primary analysis, annualized net benefits range from $88.1 million to $90.9 million, depending on the discount rate used. Exhibit 12--Net Benefits Discounted at a 3 Percent Rate [2012 $] * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 15,011,029 14,573,815 14,149,335 14,364,879 17,637,857 Carriers................................................ 0 1,305,291 1,267,273 1,230,362 1,194,526 1,159,734 Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 39,912,246 72,567,057 73,758,478 75,675,484 80,601,739 Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 50,002,944 90,621,635 92,151,498 94,296,647 99,673,573 Travelers--High......................................... 0 63,964,046 115,601,256 117,599,376 120,060,175 126,060,630 Grand Total--Low........................................ -1,321,000 56,228,567 88,408,145 89,138,174 91,234,889 99,399,330 Grand Total--Primary.................................... -1,321,000 66,319,264 106,462,723 107,531,195 109,856,052 118,471,164 Grand Total--High....................................... -1,321,000 80,280,366 131,442,344 132,979,073 135,619,580 144,858,221 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. [[Page 91666]] Exhibit 13--Net Benefits Discounted at a 7 Percent Rate [2012 $] * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP..................................................... -1,321,000 14,449,869 13,504,551 12,621,075 12,334,335 14,578,507 Carriers................................................ 0 1,256,495 1,174,295 1,097,472 1,025,674 958,574 Travelers--Low.......................................... 0 38,420,200 67,242,895 65,791,878 64,978,397 66,621,077 Travelers--Primary...................................... 0 48,133,675 83,972,830 82,198,282 80,967,371 82,384,832 Travelers--High......................................... 0 61,572,866 107,119,725 104,897,553 103,089,103 104,194,959 Grand Total--Low........................................ -1,321,000 54,126,564 81,921,741 79,510,425 78,338,407 82,158,158 Grand Total--Primary.................................... -1,321,000 63,840,039 98,651,675 95,916,829 94,327,381 97,921,913 Grand Total--High....................................... -1,321,000 77,279,231 121,798,570 118,616,100 116,449,112 119,732,040 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. Exhibit 14--Annualized Net Benefits Discounted at 3 Percent and 7 Percent [2012 $] * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3 Percent 7 Percent ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CBP..................................... 13,336,885 12,973,485 Carriers................................ 1,103,496 1,080,843 Travelers--Low.......................... 61,385,839 59,420,140 Travelers--Primary...................... 76,481,844 74,047,524 Travelers--High......................... 97,368,099 94,285,410 Grand Total--Low........................ 75,826,220 73,474,468 Grand Total--Primary.................... 90,922,226 88,101,852 Grand Total--High....................... 111,808,481 108,339,738 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Estimates may not total due to rounding. While this rule has a large net benefit to travelers as a whole, it is important to note that the net benefits do not accrue uniformly across all travelers. We next examine the effect of this rule on each type of traveler. Exhibit 14 summarizes the costs and benefits per traveler for each class of alien discussed in this analysis. With this rule, no traveler needs to fill out the paper Form I-94 while en route to the United States, saving all travelers 8 minutes, an estimated $5.89 per traveler. The 1 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers and 75 percent of other foreign travelers who need to access the Web site experience a cost of $2.95 per person because of the 4 minute time burden to access the Web site. In addition, those who need to print their Form I-94 incur a $0.25 printing cost. Those temporary workers and aliens in the ``Other/Unknown'' category who need to travel to access the Web site and print their Form I-94 have an additional travel cost. They need to travel an estimated 20 miles and 60 minutes round-trip to reach a location with internet access, at a cost of $20.89 per traveler. We reiterate that those with obstacles to accessing their electronic Forms I-94 may request a paper Form I-94 at secondary inspection stations at ports of entry or at CBP DIS. In addition, any travelers who would otherwise need to file a Form I-102 and pay the $330 fee to obtain a replacement Form I-94 receive an additional benefit of $342.81 as a result of this rule. Travelers who opt for the electronic filing option receive an additional benefit of $14.72. Exhibit 15--Annual Effect of Rule by Class of Alien [Undiscounted 2012$] * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost of time to access & 8 minute time cost to print Travel costs Net impact ** cost savings electronic Form I-94 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Travelers who do not Access Website............. 5.89 0 0 5.89 1 percent of Tourists and Business Travelers (B- 5.89 -3.19 0 2.70 1/B-2)......................................... 75 percent of Students.......................... 5.89 -3.19 0 2.70 75 percent of Temporary workers................. 5.89 -3.19 -20.89 -18.21 75 percent of Other/Unknown..................... 5.89 -3.19 -20.89 -18.21 75 percent of Diplomats......................... 5.89 -3.19 0 2.70 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimates may not total due to rounding. ** In addition to this net impact, a small number of travelers experience savings resulting from no longer needing to file a Form I-102. The primary estimate of Form I-102 cost savings to travelers is $342.81 per traveler. We do not include the Form I-102 cost savings in the net impact column of Exhibit 14 because few travelers benefit from this compared to the overall population of travelers impacted by the rule. Based on data from USCIS, we estimate that 10,918 Form I-102s per year are no longer need to be filed as a result of this rule. This is far less than one percent of the annual population of travelers affected by the rule (10,918 Form I-102s / 20,815,527 travelers in 2014 <1%). Annualized costs and benefits to all entities affected by the rule, whether domestic or foreign, are presented in the following accounting statement. [[Page 91667]] Accounting Statement: Classification of Expenditures for U.S. Entities, 2012-2017 [2012 $] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate ------------------------------------------------------------------------ U.S. Costs: Annualized monetized costs.. $23.5 million..... $21.0 million. Annualized quantified, but None.............. None. non-monetized costs. Qualitative (non-quantified) None.............. None. costs. U.S. Benefits: Annualized monetized $104.1 million.... $101.1 million. benefits. Annualized quantified, but None.............. None. non-monetized benefits. Qualitative (non-quantified) Reduced primary Reduced primary benefits. inspection inspection processing times. processing times. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ We estimate annualized costs to all entities affected by this rule to range from $21.0 million to $23.5 million. Monetized benefits of this rule range from $101.9 million to $104.1 million to all entities. Non-quantified benefits of this rule include the reduced processing time that could result because of the automation of the Form I-94. Annualized costs and benefits to U.S. entities are presented in the following accounting statement, as required by OMB Circular A-4. Accounting Statement: Classification of Expenditures for U.S. Entities, 2012-2017 [2012 $] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate ------------------------------------------------------------------------ U.S. Costs: Annualized monetized costs.. $0.454 million.... $0.466 million. Annualized quantified, but None.............. None. non-monetized costs. Qualitative (non-quantified) None.............. None. costs. U.S. Benefits: Annualized monetized $13.5 million..... $13.3 million. benefits. Annualized quantified, but None.............. None. non-monetized benefits. Qualitative (non-quantified) Reduced primary Reduced primary benefits. inspection inspection processing times. processing times. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ We estimate annualized costs to U.S. entities as a result of this rule to range from $0.454 million to $0.466 million. These are CBP's costs for automating the electronic Form I-94 and developing the Web site travelers use to access their electronic Form I-94. Monetized benefits of this rule of $13.3 million to $13.5 million to U.S. entities (CBP and carriers) represent reduced Form I-94 printing and storage costs, reduced data entry contract costs, and reduced time costs for CBP officers. Non-quantified benefits of this rule include the reduced processing time that could result because of the automation of the Form I-94. 6. Regulatory Alternatives In the analysis for the interim final rule, we considered two alternatives to the rule: (1) Eliminating the paper Form I-94 in the air and sea environments entirely and (2) providing the paper Form I-94 to all travelers who are not B-1/B-2 travelers. As a result of public comments on the interim final rule, we add a third alternative to our analysis: (3) Providing kiosks at major ports of entry where travelers have the option to print their electronic Form I-94 prior to leaving the airport. Under alternative one, if CBP were to eliminate the paper Form I-94 entirely in the air and sea environments, there are certain classes of vulnerable aliens who would be harmed. Under the rule, asylees and certain parolees are provided a paper Form I-94. These aliens have an immediate need for the Form I-94 and cannot wait to access their electronic Form I-94 from the Web site. These aliens represent a very small portion of overall international travel and providing them with a paper Form I-94 and entering the information into CBP data systems is not a significant cost to CBP. In addition, under this rule, CBP has continued to make the paper Form I-94 available to those travelers who request it at secondary inspection stations and at DIS. CBP provides this flexibility as a way to minimize the effect on those who face obstacles to accessing their electronic Form I-94. CBP does not have statistics on the number of travelers who request a paper Form I-94. Anecdotal evidence suggests that few, if any, travelers go to a secondary inspection station or a DIS for the purpose of obtaining a paper Form I-94. This may be because the travelers who need a paper Form I-94 do not know they need it when at the airport or because they find it more efficient to access the I-94 Web site and print the form than to go to secondary inspection or a DIS. Requesting a paper Form I-94 at one of these locations can take longer than the 4 minutes we estimate it takes to access the I-94 Web site and the 60 minutes in travel time we estimate that those with obstacles to internet access spend to obtain their Form I-94. As few aliens request a paper Form I-94 at secondary inspection stations or DIS, the cost to CBP for printing and data entry for these forms is minimal. Eliminating the paper Form I-94 option for asylees, certain parolees, and those travelers who request one would not result in a significant cost savings to CBP and would burden travelers who have an immediate need for an electronic Form I-94 or who face obstacles to accessing their electronic Form I-94. Under alternative two, all non-B-1/B-2 travelers required to complete a Form I-94 would receive and complete the [[Page 91668]] paper Form I-94 during their inspection when they arrive in the United States. The electronic Form I-94 would still be automatically created during inspection, but the CBP officer would need to verify that the information appearing on the form matches the information in CBP's data systems. In addition, CBP would need to write the Form I-94 number on each paper Form I-94 so that their paper form matches the electronic record. As noted earlier, over four million, or 23.7 percent, aliens were non-B-1/B-2 travelers in 2012. Filling out and processing this many paper Forms I-94 at airports and seaports would increase processing times considerably and it would only provide at best small savings to the individual traveler. As noted in the ``Net Benefits'' section, the net cost of this rule to the 75 percent of temporary workers and those in the ``Other/Unknown'' category of aliens who need a printed Form I-94 is only $18.20 per traveler. Conversely, this rule provides net benefits to travelers who do not need a printed Form I-94 and those arriving as students or diplomats. CBP received several public comments related to the obstacles travelers face in accessing a computer to print their electronic Form I-94. Commenters said that many travelers need their Form I-94 very soon after arrival, sometimes within hours of arrival, and they may have difficulty learning that public libraries offer internet access, where public libraries are, and how to travel to a public library. An employer submitted a comment stating that company privacy standards prevent it from allowing new hires to access the internet in order to access the I-94 Web site. Separately, commenters pointed out problems with the accuracy of the Form I-94 information that prevent them from logging into the Web site. Others noted that there is no way to check their Form I-94 for accuracy at time of entry into the United States. One commenter suggested a solution to these problems: That CBP provide kiosks at the airports where foreign nationals can inspect and print their electronic Form I-94. CBP considered this suggestion and made it an additional alternative to the rule. Under alternative three, we consider the costs and benefits of placing kiosks at the busiest U.S. airports and seaports to allow travelers to inspect and print their electronic Form I-94 before leaving the port of entry. For the purposes of this alternative analysis, we examine the impact of placing dedicated kiosks at the busiest 20 airports and the busiest 20 seaports. These locations account for 92 percent of international air travelers and 95 percent of international sea travelers.\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ CBP's Operations Management Reporting database. Accessed June 30, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP uses kiosks at many major airports for the Global Entry program. These kiosks are dedicated for use by members of that program, but similar kiosks could be purchased to allow travelers to access the I-94 Web site and print their Form I-94. According to CBP's Office of Field Operations, kiosks would cost $20,000 each and have an annual operations and maintenance cost of $8,732. Placing a kiosk at each of the busiest 20 airports and the busiest 20 seaports would cost $800,000 the first year and $349,280 in each subsequent years. The benefit of placing kiosks at the busiest airports and seaports depends on the number of people who would use the kiosks if they were available. CBP has no data on the extent to which travelers would choose to use the kiosks if they were available to them. As stated previously, few travelers request paper Forms I-94 upon their arrival in the United States, but that might be because doing so means going to the secondary inspection station, which can take a considerable amount of time. We also do not know how many people find errors on their electronic Forms I-94 that they could correct immediately if they were already at an airport or seaport rather than visiting a Deferred Inspection Site at a later time, though data suggests this could be a large number. In 2013, according to an analysis of data provided by CBP's Office of Field Operations, about 14 percent of unique visitors to the I-94 Web site were not able to locate their electronic Form I- 94. This may have been because of erroneous data on their Form I-94, but it could also be because they did not actually have an Form I-94 on the Web site (for example, if they are a U.S. citizen or if they already departed the country prior to accessing the Web site). Accessing the Web site via a kiosk would take 4 minutes of a traveler's time, the same amount of time as via a personal computer. Therefore, we do not believe that those who do not currently access their electronic Forms I-94 (as stated earlier, this includes the 99 percent of B-1/B-2 travelers and 25 percent of non-B-1/B-2 travelers) would now access them via the kiosks. Similarly, those with easy computer access would experience no time savings by accessing their Form I-94 via the kiosk instead of via the Web site, so we do not include their benefits in the analysis. The travelers who would benefit from the availability of kiosks to access their electronic Form I-94 are those who would otherwise need to travel to access the internet. These travelers would no longer incur the opportunity cost of traveling 60 minutes or the mileage cost of driving 20 miles roundtrip. In our analysis above, we have estimated that 33 percent of travelers in the ``Temporary Workers'' and ``Other/Unknown'' categories of travelers would need to travel to access the internet. In 2014 (the first full year the interim final rule is in effect) this represents approximately 819,000 travelers. Since we do not know how many of these travelers would choose to use the kiosks, we present the costs and benefits (using the primary estimates for travel and mileage costs) that would accrue to these travelers under a wide range of assumptions of their kiosk use. The benefits reflect the total travel costs, including travel time and mileage, derived earlier in the analysis (See Exhibit 5). We present the reduction in travel costs (which is a benefit) that would result if different percentages of travelers use a kiosk rather than travel to a location where they can access the internet. The results of our analysis are presented in Exhibit 16. Exhibit 16--Comparison of Kiosk Costs and Potential Benefits [Undiscounted 2012$] * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kiosk use rate * (%) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benefits................................................ 100 9,283,113 17,107,912 17,951,467 18,719,357 19,747,575 75 6,962,334 12,830,934 13,463,600 14,039,517 14,810,681 50 4,641,556 8,553,956 8,975,733 9,359,678 9,873,788 [[Page 91669]] 25 2,320,778 4,276,978 4,487,867 4,679,839 4,936,894 10 928,311 1,710,791 1,795,147 1,871,936 1,974,758 5 464,156 855,396 897,573 935,968 987,379 1 92,831 171,079 179,515 187,194 197,476 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CBP Costs............................................... .............. .............. 800,000 329,280 329,280 329,280 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Note that Kiosk Use Rate represents the percentage of those who would otherwise need to travel to access a computer, not total Form I-94 travelers. Only approximately 4 percent of total Form I-94 travelers need to travel to access the Web site (12 percent of travelers in the ``Temporary Worker'' or ``Other/Unknown'' categories times 33 percent of those categories who would need to travel to access the internet = 4 percent). As shown in Exhibit 15, kiosks have a large potential for benefits if they are used by a substantial number of travelers. If 100 percent of travelers who would otherwise need to travel to access a computer used the kiosks instead, benefits would outpace the costs of the kiosks by a margin of $17.2 million to $0.8 million in 2014 and by more in later years. Even if only 5 percent of travelers who would otherwise need to travel to access a computer use the kiosks, benefits would exceed costs. However, based on CBP's experience with travelers requesting paper Forms I-94 at the ports of entry, CBP does not believe enough travelers would use the kiosks to merit the expense. Further, due to budget constraints, CBP does not have funds to acquire these kiosks at this time. The Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996, requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of a proposed rule on small entities when the agency is required to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer than 50,000 people). Since a notice of proposed rulemaking was not necessary, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not required. Nonetheless, DHS has considered the impact of this rule on small entities. This rule primarily regulates individuals and individuals are not considered small entities. In addition, the individual travelers may obtain a paper Form I-94 upon request, which would eliminate the impacts of this rule for those travelers. Employers who have internet access may choose to allow their employees to use their internet connection to access the employee's electronic Form I-94, but they are not required to do so and are therefore not directly regulated by this rule. To the extent an employer chooses to assist an employee with accessing the internet and printing a Form I-94, this impact would not rise to being an economically significant impact under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This rule also regulates air and sea carriers by eliminating the need for them to provide the paper Form I-94 to their passengers. This rule would impact all small carriers that transport passengers to the United States. We therefore conclude that this rule has an impact on a substantial number of small entities. As stated in the economic impact analysis above, we estimate that carriers spend $1.3 million a year printing and storing forms for their passengers, based on 2011 passenger volumes. In 2011, 16,586,753 Forms I-94 provided by carriers were filed at airports and seaports. Dividing these figures, we estimate that carriers spent 8 cents per form on printing and storage costs. Under this rule, carriers would no longer need to print and store the Forms I-94, thus eliminating these costs. According to a 2013 study by the Department of Commerce's Office of Travel and Tourism Industries,\36\ the average airline ticket price for an international traveler traveling to the United States is $1,588. The cost to the carrier of printing a Form I-94 is less than one hundredth of one percent of the revenue a carrier receives from the average passenger. We therefore do not believe that this rule has a significant economic impact on small entities. We also note that any impact to small carriers would be purely beneficial. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ Department of Commerce, National Travel and Tourism Office. ``Profile of Overseas Travelers to the United States: 2013 Inbound.'' Available at http://travel.trade.gov/outreachpages/download_data_table/2013_Overseas_Visitor_Profile.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Privacy CBP will ensure that all Privacy Act requirements and policies are adhered to in the implementation of this rule, and will be updating the Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the I-94 Web site. CBP will outline in the updated PIA how CBP will ensure compliance with Privacy Act protections. In the updated PIA, CBP will explain the privacy risks and mitigations CBP has implemented during this phase of the Form I-94 automation process. DHS/CBP will post the updated PIA online at: http://www.dhs.gov/privacy-documents-us-customs-and-border-protection. The PIA that covers the earlier phase of Form I-94 automation, and describes how CBP complies with the Privacy Act, is available at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/pia-cbp-16-I-94-automation-20130227.pdf. Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information regarding the CBP Form I-94 (Arrival/ Departure Record) was previously reviewed and approved by OMB in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) under OMB Control Number 1651-0111. This OMB Control Number also includes the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), ESTA fee, and Form I-94W, all of which are unaffected by this rule. In addition, information for the electronic Form I-94 is comprised of information already collected for APIS under approval 1651-0088. An agency may not conduct, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of [[Page 91670]] information displays a valid control number assigned by OMB. The burden hours associated with the collections of information contained in this Final Rule were previously reviewed and approved by OMB. The automation of the paper Form I-94 for commercial aircraft and vessel passengers in accordance with this Final Rule results in a reduction of 1,278,456 annual burden hours under OMB control number 1651-0111. Also in accordance with this Final Rule, the electronic Form I-94 is available to aliens on a secure Web site. Passengers may log into the Web site using 7 pieces of basic identifying information that is either known to the traveler (their first name, last name and date of birth) or readily available on their passport (passport number, country of issuance, date of entry, and class of admission). The estimated annual burden associated with this Web site, is 254,680 hours under OMB control number 1651-0111. The automation of the paper Form I-94 for commercial aircraft and vessel passengers in accordance with this Final Rule results in an estimated reduction of 10,918 Forms I-102, Application for Replacement/ Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document, filed, and an estimated reduction of 4,541.89 burden hours under OMB control number 1615-0079. Exhibit 16 summarizes the difference in the burden for the previous process and the process under this rule. As OMB Control Number 1651- 0111 includes ESTA and Form I-94W, we include those burden hours for informational purposes. We note that these burden hours are unaffected by this rule. Exhibit 16--PRA Burden Effects of the Rule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Collection Respondents Burden Hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre-IFR.................................... I-94......................... 14,000,000 1,862,000 Website...................... 0 0 I-102........................ 17,700 7,363 ESTA......................... 19,140,000 4,785,000 I-94W........................ 100,000 333,147 Final Rule................................. I-94......................... 4,387,550 583,544 Website...................... 3,858,782 254,680 I-102........................ 6,782 2,821 ESTA......................... 19,140,000 4,785,000 I-94W........................ 100,000 13,333 Difference................................. I-94......................... -9,612,450 -1,278,456 Website...................... 3,858,782 254,680 I-102........................ -10,918 -4,542 ESTA......................... 0 0 I-94W........................ 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amendments to the Regulations For the reasons set forth above, the interim final rule amending 8 CFR parts 1, 210, 212, 214, 215, 231, 235, 245, 245a, 247, 253, 264, 274a, and 286, published at 78 FR 18457 on March 27, 2013, is adopted as a final rule without change. Jeh Charles Johnson, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-30459 Filed 12-16-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
![91646 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
handlers, have to bear the burden of the For the reasons set forth in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
increased assessment rate. preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as Suzanne Shepherd, U.S. Customs and
As previously noted, assessments are follows: Border Protection Office of Field
minimal and uniform on all handlers. Operations by telephone (202) 344–2073
Thus, small handlers bear a PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN or by email, Suzanne.M.Shepherd@
proportional burden compared to larger CALIFORNIA dhs.gov.
handlers. The increase was SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
recommended unanimously by the ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
Board, which is made up of small and part 984 continues to read as follows: Abbreviations and Terms Used in This
large handlers, as well as small and Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. Document
large growers, representing the entire ■ 2. Section 984.347 is revised to read ACI–A Airports Council International-
California walnut industry. The Board as follows: North America
made the unanimous recommendation ACIP American Council on International
based upon deliberations by four of its § 984.347 Assessment rate. Personnel
standing committees: the Market On and after September 1, 2016, an ADIS Arrival and Departure Information
assessment rate of $0.0465 per System
Development Committee, Production
kernelweight pound is established for AILA American Immigration Lawyers
Research Committee, Grades and Association
Standards Committee, and Budget and California merchantable walnuts. APA Administrative Procedure Act
Personnel Committee. All four Dated: December 12, 2016. APIS Advance Passenger Information
committees reviewed the proposed Bruce Summers, Systems
expenses and crop size, and considered Associate Administrator, Agricultural
CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection
alternative assessment rates. All of the CBSA Canadian Border Services Agency
Marketing Service.
committees recommended the increased CCD Consular Consolidated Database
[FR Doc. 2016–30307 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] CFR Code of Federal Regulations
assessment rate and determined that the
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DHS Department of Homeland Security
budget was prudent, resulting in a DIS Deferred Inspection Site
unanimous recommendation from the DMV Departments of Motor Vehicles
Board. DOS Department of State
Accordingly, no changes will be made DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND DOT Department of Transportation
to the rule as proposed, based on the SECURITY ESTA Electronic System of Travel
comments received. Authorization
8 CFR PARTS 1, 210, 212, 214, 215, FAQ Frequently Asked Question
A small business guide on complying 231, 235, 245, 245a, 247, 253, 264, 274a, FNU First Name Unknown
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop and 286 FOIA Freedom of Information Act
marketing agreements and orders may ICAO International Civil Aviation
be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ [Docket No. USCBP–2013–0011; CBP Dec. Organization
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. No. 16–27] ICE U.S. Immigration and Customs
Any questions about the compliance Enforcement
RIN 1651–AA96
guide should be sent to Richard Lower IFR Interim Final Rule
at the previously mentioned address in INA Immigration and Nationality Act
Definition of Form I–94 To Include INM Instituto Nacional de Migración
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Electronic Format
section. INS Immigration and Naturalization Service
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border LNU Last Name Unknown
After consideration of all relevant MRZ Machine Readable Zone
material presented, including the Protection, DHS. NAFSA NAFSA: Association of
information and recommendation ACTION: Final rule. International Educators
submitted by the Board and other OIS Office of Immigration Statistics
available information, it is hereby found SUMMARY: This final rule adopts, OMB Office of Management and Budget
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, without change, interim amendments to OTTI Office of Travel and Tourism
will tend to effectuate the declared the Department of Homeland Security Industries
policy of the Act. (DHS) regulations which were PIA Privacy Impact Assessment
published in the Federal Register on PII Personally Identifiable Information
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also POE Port of Entry
found and determined that good cause March 27, 2013, as CBP Dec. No. 13–06.
SAVE USCIS’s Systematic Alien
exists for not postponing the effective These amendments enabled DHS to
Verification for Entitlements program
date of this rule until 30 days after transition the issuance of the Form I–94 SEVIS Student and Exchange Visitor
publication in the Federal Register (Arrival/Departure Record) to an Information System
because handlers are already receiving automated process. In the automated SEVP Student and Exchange Visitor
2016–17 crop walnuts from growers, the process, DHS creates a Form I–94 in an Information Program
crop year began on September 1, 2016, electronic format based on passenger, SHRM Society for Human Resource
and the assessment rate applies to all passport and visa information DHS Management
obtains electronically from air and sea SSA Social Security Administration
walnuts received during the 2016–17 USCIS U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
and subsequent seasons. Further, carriers and the Department of State
Services
handlers are aware of this rule, which (DOS) as well as through the inspection
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
was recommended at a public meeting. process. This document addresses the VWP Visa Waiver Program
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Also, a 30-day comment period was comments received in response to the
provided for in the proposed rule. interim rule and discusses some Executive Summary
operational modifications to the Form I– The Form I–94 (Arrival/Departure
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984 94 process that were implemented after Record) is issued by DHS to certain
Marketing agreements, Nuts, publication of the interim rule. nonimmigrant foreign nationals upon
Reporting and recordkeeping DATES: This final rule is effective arrival in the United States or when
requirements. January 18, 2017. they change status in the United States.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 91647
The Form I–94 is used to document and money for the traveling public, comments. These changes, which are
arrival and departure and provides carriers, and CBP. described in the comment responses, are
evidence of the terms of admission or CBP makes the electronic Form I–94 intended to help travelers retrieve their
parole. The Form I–94 is also used by available through a Web site. To access Form I–94 information and travel
individuals granted asylum in the the Form I–94 through the Web site the history more easily.
United States as a proof of their grant of traveler inputs information from his/her CBP has completed an updated
asylum and by refugees as proof of their passport. If needed, nonimmigrants may economic assessment analyzing the
refugee status. CBP, a component of print out a copy of the Form I–94 from effects of the automation of the Form I–
DHS, generally issues the Form I–94 to the Web site and present it to third 94. This rule affects CBP, air and sea
nonimmigrants at the time they lawfully parties in lieu of the paper form. CBP carriers that transport foreign nationals
enter the United States. Nonimmigrant continues to provide a paper Form I–94 to the United States, and the foreign
travelers use the Form I–94 for various to certain classes of aliens, such as nationals themselves. CBP will incur
purposes such as completing the Form asylees, certain parolees, and others costs associated with linking its data
I–9 to verify employment eligibility, upon request or whenever CBP systems and building and maintaining
applying for immigration benefits, or determines the issuance of a paper form the I–94 Web site. CBP benefits through
presenting to a university to verify is appropriate.1 lower printing, storage, and contract
eligibility for enrollment. This regulation also is consistent with costs. CBP estimated a net benefit of
On March 27, 2013, CBP published an CBP’s enhancements to the I–94 Web $15.5 million for CBP in 2013. Carriers
interim final rule (IFR) in the Federal site to enable travelers arriving at a land benefit as a result of lower printing and
Register (78 FR 18457) that added to the port of entry to submit the Form I–94 storage costs. CBP estimated a net
regulations a definition of ‘‘Form I–94’’ information to CBP and pay the required benefit of $1.3 million for carriers in
to allow the Form I–94 to be in either fee prior to arrival. Unlike the 2013. Foreign nationals traveling to the
paper or electronic format. Prior to the automated process for air and sea where United States incur opportunity costs
effective date of the IFR, the Form I–94 CBP creates an electronic Form I–94 associated with logging onto the Web
was a paper form only. The IFR made based on information collected via APIS site to access their electronic Form I–94,
necessary changes to the regulations to and other sources, this I–94 land border printing their Form I–94, and, for some
enable CBP to transition from only process enables travelers to provide the travelers, the cost to drive to a location
paper to allow for an electronic form. In Form I–94 information to CBP with internet access so they can access
the case of air and sea ports of entry, the electronically prior to arrival to and print their electronic Form I–94.
regulation allowed CBP to transition to facilitate the land border issuance Foreign nationals benefit from a reduced
an automated process whereby CBP process. The enhanced I–94 Web site opportunity cost associated with filling
creates an electronic Form I–94 based launched on September 29, 2016. out a paper Form I–94 and reduced
on information collected via the DHS received eighteen submissions in opportunity and fee costs associated
Advance Passenger Information System response to the IFR. Most of these with filing a Form I–102 to replace a lost
(APIS) along with visa information submissions contained comments Form I–94. CBP estimates a net benefit
transmitted to CBP by the Department of providing support, voicing concerns, of between $4141.1 million and $6565.9
State. The automated process applies highlighting issues, or offering million in 2013 for foreign travelers. In
only to nonimmigrants arriving at air suggestions for modifications to the total, CBP estimates that net benefits to
and sea ports of entry because APIS data automation process. After review of the all parties ranged from $5757.9 million
is currently collected only for air and comments, CBP has decided to finalize to $8282.7 million in 2013. Net benefits
sea. The automation of the Form I–94 the interim final rule without change. to U.S. entities (carriers and CBP)
process for nonimmigrants arriving by However, CBP has made some totaled $16.8 million in 2013. Net
air or sea eliminates duplicative operational changes, primarily to the I– benefits are summarized in table ES–1
information collections and saves time 94 Web site, in response to the below.
EXHIBIT ES–1—NET BENEFITS
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CBP .......................................................... ¥1,321,000 15,461,360 15,461,360 15,461,360 16,167,798 20,447,110
Carriers .................................................... 0 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Travelers—Low ........................................ 0 41,109,614 76,986,391 80,597,880 85,173,424 93,439,507
Travelers—Primary .................................. 0 51,503,032 96,140,493 100,696,430 106,131,707 115,548,989
Travelers—High ....................................... 0 65,882,967 122,641,373 128,504,014 135,128,784 146,138,820
Grand Total—Low ............................. ¥1,321,000 57,915,424 93,792,201 97,403,690 102,685,671 115,231,067
Grand Total—Primary ....................... ¥1,321,000 68,308,842 112,946,303 117,502,240 123,643,955 137,340,549
Grand Total—High ..................... ¥1,321,000 82,688,777 139,447,183 145,309,824 152,641,032 167,930,380
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1 As of September 2015, CBP has automated the access their Form I–94 from the I–94 Web site. CBP unless one is requested or CBP determines that it
Form I–94 process for refugees. Refugees can now no longer provides a paper Form I–94 to refugees is appropriate to issue one.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 91651
help reduce FOIA requests regarding mobile devices. Commenters also Comment: A few commenters had
travel history. More details about the requested that both www.cbp.gov/I-94 privacy concerns related to the Web site.
benefits CBP anticipates from this and www.cbp.gov/I-94 [note the hyphen One commenter was concerned that
change can be found in the economic in I–94] direct users to the proper Web CBP will automatically collect
assessment below, entitled ‘‘Executive site. information on those persons attempting
Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Response: Although CBP does not to access the Form I–94 information
Review) and Executive Order 13563 have the resources to conduct testing on from the Web site. Another commenter
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory multiple platforms, CBP has not was concerned that the personal
Review).’’ received any feedback concerning a lack information available on the Web site
Comment: One commenter asked of functionality on any platform. Due to could be accessed by unauthorized
whether nonimmigrants who received updates that CBP has made to parties, which put refugees or those
paper Forms I–94 would be able to get www.cbp.gov as a whole, the full seeking asylum in the United States at
replacements from the Web site. address for the Form I–94 retrieval Web risk.
Response: The Web site now provides site is now: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I-94/ Response: DHS/CBP has issued a
access to Forms I–94 issued up to five request.html. Both web addresses Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), which
years prior to the query date. Currently, www.cbp.gov/I-94 and www.cbp.gov/I- describes the I–94 Web site, and posted
nonimmigrants who have received 94 direct users to a Web site with it online at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/
paper Forms I–94 since 2009 are able to information about the Form I–94, and default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/
access their Form I–94 information via includes a link to the Form I–94 pia-cbp-16–I–94-automation-
the Web site. retrieval page. 20130227.pdf. DHS/CBP has also
Comment: Several commenters were Comment: Several commenters, updated and reissued the System of
concerned that foreign nationals may including AILA, ACIP, SHRM, and Feld Records Notice (SORN) for the
not be able to access their records on the Entertainment, suggested adding an Nonimmigrant and Immigrant
Web site due to typographical or endorsement or other information on Information System (NIIS) at 80 FR
biographical errors that occur during the the printout to help educate those 13398, a system for maintaining the
creation of the electronic Form I–94 stakeholders who are not accustomed to arrival and departure records of
record. In particular, a few commenters seeing Form I–94 printouts from the nonimmigrants, and for APIS at 80 FR
noted that information is frequently Web site, and might be reluctant to 13407. CBP is in the process of updating
entered incorrectly on visas, especially accept the printout. Some commenters the PIA, which will discuss how the
incorrect name spellings. Information also suggested including a phone I–94 Web site will retain information
drawn from visas would then be number or email address on the about attempts to access the I–94 Web
incorrect, and travelers would not be printout. site (i.e. the search history) for only
successful when querying their Form Response: CBP agrees that additional three months and as part of the Web
I–94 record. language on the printout would help site’s audit log. The search history, as
Response: Most of the biographical educate stakeholders, and has added part of the audit log, is part of the Web
information CBP uses in creating the language to the printout indicating that site’s infrastructure. The audit log is
electronic Form I–94 is drawn from the the Form I–94 has now been automated only maintained in the Web site’s
traveler’s passport. The only for most nonimmigrants. While CBP has infrastructure, and the search history is
information drawn from the visa for the decided not to add a phone number or retained for only three months, to
Form I–94 is the visa classification and email to the printout, there is a link on reduce the risk of improper use or
issuance date. The exact format of the the I–94 retrieval Web site that directs disclosure of the search history. The
name used in the electronic Form I–94 users to the CBP help desk. benefits of keeping an audit log of
is found in the Machine Readable Zone Comment: A few commenters stated searches conducted on the I–94 Web site
(MRZ) of the passport, found at the that it was unclear how CBP would include preventing improper and
bottom of the biographical page of the prevent fraudulent printouts. unauthorized use of the Web site, and
passport. A traveler having trouble Response: CBP does not believe that holding accountable anyone who uses
finding his or her Form I–94 record the printout creates a greater risk of the I–94 Web site improperly or without
should look at the way his or her name fraud than the paper Forms I–94, which authorization.
is formatted in the passport MRZ. The did not contain any security features. CBP believes that the benefits of
MRZ shows the traveler’s name CBP continues to encourage having an audit log outweigh the small
immediately following the three letter stakeholders to verify a traveler’s and limited risks of improper use and
country code, as last/surname and given information through SAVE or E-Verify, disclosure of search histories. The log of
name separated by chevrons (<<<<). A when registered or enrolled, search histories allows CBP to conduct
traveler should not include the country respectively, in these services, and only audits and uncover when an
code when querying his or her Form as authorized. unauthorized party is attempting to
I–94 record. The MRZ does not use The SAVE program is a USCIS service obtain information from the I–94 Web
punctuation such as hyphens or that helps federal, state, and local site. For example, if a single access
apostrophes. In some cases, a traveler’s benefit-issuing agencies, institutions, point conducts multiple searches for
name might be truncated in the MRZ; in and licensing agencies determine the different individuals, CBP will
such cases, the traveler should query the immigration status of benefit applicants investigate whether someone or
truncated version of the name. CBP has so only those entitled to benefits receive something is conducting searches
included guidance on this issue on the them. More information on SAVE can be without the travelers’ consent. CBP has
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
FAQs page of the I–94 Web site, along found at: http://www.uscis.gov/save. included a new security consent page to
with an example passport page for E-Verify is a web-based system that the Form I–94 retrieval Web site that
reference. allows businesses to confirm the users must read and accept before
Comment: A few commenters eligibility of their employees to work in querying an Form I–94 record. The
requested that CBP ensure that the Web the United States. More information on security page requires users to affirm
site is accessible on a variety of E-Verify can be found at: http:// that they are authorized to obtain that
platforms and browsers, including www.uscis.gov/e-verify. traveler’s history, and to understand
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/6.svg)
![91654 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Coordination With Other Agencies Form I–9 purposes. Refugees and relate to the person presenting them.
Comment: Some commenters asylees may also choose to present According to USCIS, which issues the
complained of disparate guidance from Forms I–94 for completion of Section 2 Form I–9, if an employee chooses to
various government agencies concerning and Section 3 of the Form I–9, although present a Form I–94 along with their
the automated Form I–94. For example, they also have the option to present foreign passport to show identity and
some commenters stated that the SSA other documents instead. Refugees may employment authorization in Section 2
published guidance indicating that choose to present a Form I–94 printout of the Form I–9, he or she will need to
either an unexpired admission stamp or or a paper Form I–94 with a refugee present to his or her employer a Form
a printout from the Form I–94 Web site stamp as an acceptable receipt for Form I–94 in paper format, which includes a
will be accepted as proof of I–9 purposes that does not need to be Form I–94 printed out from the CBP
paired with any other document. Web site. If an employee provides the
nonimmigrant status. USCIS, however,
Asylees who wish to show a Form I–94 Form I–94 he or she obtained from the
has published guidance on its Web site
may present their paper Form I–94 as a CBP Web site with his or her foreign
stating that USCIS and state DMVs will
List C document in combination with a passport as a List A document, the
require a printout of the Form I–94.
valid List B document. employer should accept these
Further, one commenter noted that at Comment: A few commenters, documents if they appear to be genuine
least one DMV office still required a including AILA and the Intel and reasonably relate to the person
stamp on the Form I–94 and had not Corporation, were concerned that presenting them. Form I–9 rules permit
heard of the change to the automated inconsistent rules regarding when a employees to present certain receipts in
Form I–94. Form I–94 printout is acceptable will lieu of the original document(s): 1. A
Response: CBP has conducted materially affect foreign nationals’ receipt for a replacement of a lost,
extensive outreach to other agencies and access to employment and benefits, stolen, or damaged document; 2. the
to DMVs regarding the automation of such as Social Security cards, driver’s arrival portion of the Form I–94 or Form
the Form I–94. The requirements of licenses and extensions or changes of I–94A containing a Temporary I–551
various federal and state agencies may nonimmigrant status. Commenters also stamp and photograph; and 3. the
differ for practical or legal reasons, said that inconsistent rules could departure portion of Form I–94 or I–94A
resulting in some agencies being able to adversely affect U.S. businesses; for with an unexpired refugee admission
accept the admission stamp while example, if DHS continues to require stamp. 8 CFR 274a.2(b). USCIS has
others may still require a printout of the printouts bearing an admission number, determined that a Form I–94 printed out
Form I–94. Per commenters’ employers could be fined by DHS for from the CBP Web site by a refugee is
suggestions, CBP has added the failure to record this number on the acceptable for Form I–9 purposes
following language on the Form I–94 Form I–9. A delay or grace period in any without an unexpired refugee admission
printout to aid in educating enforcement actions related to the I–9 stamp as long as the printout provides
stakeholders not familiar with the regarding the entry of admission the class of admission as ‘‘RE’’ and
electronic Form I–94: numbers is encouraged. duration of admission as ‘‘D/S [duration
Effective April 26, 2013, DHS began Response: The requirements to record of status].’’
automating the admission process. An alien document numbers on Section 2 of the In the benefits-granting context, DHS
lawfully admitted or paroled into the United Form I–9 have not changed. DHS will continue its outreach to other
States is no longer required to be in regulations require employers to record federal, State, and local agencies to
possession of a preprinted Form I–94. A the necessary information from indicate that when a Form I–94 is
record of admission printed from the CBP documents the employee presents to required as proof of valid admission to
Web site constitutes a lawful record of
complete Form I–9 within three days the United States, a Form I–94 in either
admission. See 8 CFR 1.4(d).
from the date of hire. Section 1 of Form paper or print-out format is acceptable.
Comment: Some commenters had I–9 requires employees who attest to Comment: Commenters encouraged
particular concerns about completing being aliens authorized to work in the CBP to continue education outreach to
USCIS’s Form I–9, as that form requests United States to record either their alien agencies, employers, and other
the Form I–94 number. Commenters number (or USCIS number) or Form I– stakeholders that might remain unaware
suggested that either the period of 94 admission number. Section 1 of Form of the change to electronic Forms I–94.
admission or the passport number and I–9 must be completed by the employee Commenters specifically urged
country of issuance serve as the at the time of hire (i.e., first day of work education to improve access to and use
required data fields on the Form I–9. for pay). The Form I–94 number can be of DHS verification tools, such as SAVE
Otherwise, workers without internet found on the Form I–94 printout; there and E-Verify.
access will have trouble completing the is no requirement that the number must Response: CBP has conducted
Form I–9. come from the Form I–94 itself. The extensive outreach to local, state, and
Response: USCIS, the owner of the timing requirements for Form I–9 federal agencies, scholarly
Form I–9 (Employment Eligibility completion are regulatory. DHS may organizations, and other non-
Verification), is reviewing its forms and provide more flexibility in the timing governmental entities both before and
applicable regulations and policies, but requirements in a future rulemaking. after automation. CBP involved all DHS
at this time, it is not able to change the Employees are still required to components, DOS, SSA, and the
required information on Section 1 of the present documents of their choice from Department of Commerce in the
Form I–9. For completion of Section 2 the Lists of Acceptable Documents automation process through working
of Form I–9, employees who are aliens specified in the Form I–9 to show groups. CBP in conjunction with USCIS
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
authorized for employment with a identity and employment authorization provided guidance and support to all
specific employer incident to their on Form I–9. To satisfy 8 CFR 274a.2, major DMVs that participate in the
nonimmigrant status may choose to original documents must be presented SAVE program. CBP coordinated with
present their foreign passport together to employers, which employers must NAFSA and other student organizations
with Form I–94 in paper format (which examine to make a determination to inform academic institutions. CBP
includes a printout from the Web site); regarding whether the documents has met with the U.S. Chamber of
admission stamps are not acceptable for appear to be genuine and to reasonably Commerce, the travel and tourism
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/9.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 91657
arriving by air and sea, so we must EXHIBIT 1—PROJECTED FORM I–94 The costs of this rule are borne by
exclude those arriving by land. We RESPONDENTS TRAVELING BY AIR both CBP and aliens traveling to the
therefore subtract the number of aliens AND SEA—Continued United States.
entering the U.S. at land border ports [*denotes projection] a. Costs to CBP of Automation at the Air
using a Form I–94 in 2012. According to
2016 ................................................ 22,628,579 and Sea Ports of Entry
CBP’s Office of Field Operations, about
2017 ................................................ 23,871,524 This rule allows for the automation of
15.4 million aliens arriving from Mexico
and 1.2 million arriving from Canada the paper Form I–94 in the air and sea
entered the United States at the land b. Electronic Implementation at the environments.18 Almost all of the
border using a Form I–94 in 2012. We Land Border traveler information collected on the
subtract these from the admission total, This rule affects the process of Form I–94 prior to the implementation
leaving 16,952,996 non-VWP aliens who obtaining a Form I–94 for travelers of this rule was redundant in the air and
arrived in the U.S. by air or sea using arriving by air and sea and is consistent sea environments because CBP already
a Form I–94 in 2012. with CBP’s transition to accepting I–94 obtained the same information
We next estimate the number of Form submissions online for use at the land electronically from other sources. In
I–94 travelers to the United States in the border. In addition to the automation at advance of the implementation of this
rest of the period of analysis.14 For 2013 air and sea ports of entry, CBP modified rule, CBP linked its data systems to use
and 2014, we again use actual data from the process by which a traveler arriving the information from these alternate
the Office of Immigration statistics. For at the land border can provide Form I– sources to create an electronic Form I–
2015 through 2017, we use the traveler 94 information and pay the related fee 94 during the admission process. CBP
projections developed by the Office of by adding an electronic option. The creates the electronic Form I–94 by
Travel and Tourism Industries (OTTI) enhanced I–94 Web site launched on pulling information from the traveler’s
within the U.S. Department of September 29, 2016. Advance Passenger Information System
Commerce.15 The OTTI forecasts travel Due to the differences in documentary (APIS) record and any Consular
growth through 2020 for the 20 requirements for land border entries, the Consolidated Database (CCD) record and
countries with the highest 2014 travel Form I–94 issuance process varies then by entering any additional data
volume. Since the vast majority of slightly at a land border port of entry obtained during the inspection process.
travelers from most countries arrive in than at an air or sea port of entry. This electronic process allows
the United States by air and sea, we Currently when a traveler requiring a stakeholders that have access to CBP’s
assume that OTTI’s travel growth rates Form I–94 arrives at the land border, he/ databases to continue to have access to
best reflect air and sea travel growth. she goes to secondary inspection where traveler information electronically.
For Mexico and Canada, we subtract the he/she provides the I–94 information to CBP’s Office of Information Technology
number of Form I–94 travelers arriving a CBP officer who inputs the data into estimates the cost to link data systems
by land in 2012 before applying the a computer. The process takes and to fully automate the Form I–94 was
OTTI growth rates.16 We apply the OTTI approximately 8 minutes in addition to about $1 million in calendar year 2012.
projected growth rates to the number of the time of the actual inspection. After In addition, it estimates the cost to
Forms I–94 by country we obtained determining the traveler’s admissibility, develop the secure Web site was about
from OIS. For countries not separately the CBP officer then prints a Form I–94 $321,000 in 2012. CBP anticipates
forecasted by OTTI, we use OTTI’s for the traveler and refers him/her to the spending $92,000 per year in operations
average growth rate for overseas travel cashier to pay the associated $6 fee.17 It and maintenance costs for these
for each year to determine overseas takes approximately 20 minutes to wait systems. In total, CBP incurred costs of
travel from these countries. We present in line to pay the fee and approximately $1,321,000 in 2012 and will incur costs
the total number of projected Forms I– 2 minutes to pay the fee. of $92,000 in following years.
94 for each year from 2012–2017 absent
the rule in Exhibit 1 below. 3. Costs b. Costs of Electronic Implementation at
We next estimate the costs and the Land Border
EXHIBIT 1—PROJECTED FORM I–94 benefits of this rule for all affected CBP’s Office of Information
RESPONDENTS TRAVELING BY AIR parties. For the interim final rule, we Technology estimates that it cost
AND SEA assumed that the rule would go into approximately $540,000 in 2016 to
[*denotes projection] effect on January 1, 2013. The rule develop the Web site and create the
actually went into effect on April 22, online payment capabilities. CBP will
2012 ................................................ 16,952,996 2013. Because certain key data on not bear any additional costs to process
2013 ................................................ 16,832,602 arrivals by class of admission is only travelers as a result of this process.
2014 ................................................ 20,680,611
2015 ................................................ 21,700,329
available publicly on an annual basis, Travelers will not face new costs or
we incorporate some prorated arrivals time burdens under the new optional
14 2013 and 2014 Yearbook of Immigration estimates into this analysis. For the process at the land border. Under this
Statistics. Table 28. https://www.dhs.gov/yearbook- purpose of this analysis, we assume that process, travelers will have the option to
immigration-statistics. Accessed October 26, 2016. the rule went into effect on May 1, 2013 use a new CBP Web site to answer the
15 U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Travel
and we prorate the 2013 estimates to Form I–94 questions and to pay the $6
and Tourism Industries ‘‘Forecast of International reflect that the rule was in effect for 8
Travelers to the United States by Top Origin
fee in advance of travel. As the Form I–
Countries.’’ October 2015. Available at http:// months of the year. To the extent that 94 questions are not changing, the time
travel among various classes of burden to submit the information is not
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
travel.trade.gov/view/f-2000-99-001/forecast/
Forecast-COUNTRIES.pdf. admission is not consistent throughout changing. Similarly, we estimate that it
16 For the purposes of these projections, we
the year, the 2013 estimates may be will take the traveler 2 minutes to pay
assume that aliens arriving from Mexico and
Canada at land borders are Mexican and Canadian
overstated or understated. the fee online, which is the same as the
citizens. There are a small number of citizens of
other countries who enter the U.S. at land borders. 17 The amount of fee for the issuance of the Form 18 A small number of paper Forms I–94 are still
Because the number for each country is small, the I–94 at a land border port of entry is provided for being used for certain aliens such as aslyees, certain
effect on the projections is minimal. in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(ii)(D). parolees, and those who request a paper Form I–94.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/12.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 91661
traveler costs of time to access $8.1 million with a primary estimate of
electronic Forms I–94 and their cost to $6.6 million.
print them ranged from $5.5 million to
EXHIBIT 4—TRAVELER COSTS OF TIME TO ACCESS AND COST TO PRINT ELECTRONIC FORM I–94
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Forms I–94 ............................................. 2,080,285 3,833,772 4,022,807 4,194,886 4,425,303
DOT—Low ($) ........................................ 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50
DOT—Primary ($) .................................. 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15 44.15
DOT—High ($) ....................................... 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75 54.75
Time Cost—Low ($) ............................... 5,061,648 9,328,146 9,788,098 10,206,792 10,767,432
Time Cost—Primary ($) ......................... 4,730,513 8,147,564 7,990,003 7,786,713 7,677,030
Time Cost—High ($) .............................. 4,914,222 8,792,673 8,957,496 9,068,603 9,288,081
Printing Cost ($) ..................................... 520,071 958,443 1,005,702 1,048,722 1,106,326
Total Cost—Low ($) ........................ 5,581,720 10,286,589 10,793,800 11,255,514 11,873,758
Total Cost—Primary ($) .................. 6,643,502 12,243,356 12,847,050 13,396,594 14,132,443
Total Cost—High ($) ....................... 8,112,544 14,950,663 15,687,848 16,358,910 17,257,474
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
We next address the travel costs for need to travel 20 miles roundtrip and mileage rate for business travel of
those aliens who do not have ready spend 60 minutes of time to access their $0.555 per mile.29 Exhibit 5 shows the
access to the internet. Once again, we electronic Form I–94. We also assume 2013 to 2017 aliens’ travel costs to
assume that 33 percent of travelers in that these travelers have a value of time access the internet. As shown we
the ‘‘Temporary Workers’’ and ‘‘Other/ best characterized by the average H–2A estimate that the total travel costs were
Unknown’’ categories (approximately 12 wage rate of $9.79 per hour. For the cost $9.3 million in 2013.
percent of the total, see exhibit 2) would of travel, we use the 2012 IRS standard
EXHIBIT 5—TRAVEL COSTS *
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Affected Aliens ..................................................................... 444,381 818,952 859,333 896,092 945,312
H2A Wage Rate ($) ............................................................. 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79
Time Cost ($) ....................................................................... 4,350,487 8,017,542 8,412,870 8,772,738 9,254,608
Mileage Cost ($) .................................................................. 4,932,626 9,090,369 9,538,597 9,946,618 10,492,967
Total Travel Cost ($) ............................................................ 9,283,113 17,107,912 17,951,467 18,719,357 19,747,575
* Estimates may not total due to rounding. Undiscounted dollars.
To summarize, both CBP and aliens 2013 for those in the temporary worker Exhibit 6 summarizes the 2012–2017
bear costs as a result of this rule. CBP and ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ categories who costs of this rule. As shown, costs for
bore the costs to link its data systems have to travel to access their electronic this rule in 2013 ranged from $15.0
and to build a Web site so aliens can Form I–94. Aliens arriving as B–1/B–2 million to $17.5 million. In our primary
access their electronic Forms I–94. CBP travelers, diplomats, students, and those estimate, costs for this rule are $16.0
continues to incur annual costs to temporary workers and aliens in the million in 2013. Less than one percent
operate and maintain the I–94 Web site. ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ category who do not of these costs are incurred by the U.S.
Temporary workers and aliens in the need to travel to access their Form I–94 entities. These are CBP’s costs for
‘‘Other/Unknown category (see Exhibit bear costs when logging into the Web automating the electronic Form I–94
2) bear costs when logging into the Web site and printing electronic Forms I–94. and developing the Web site travelers
site, traveling to a location with public
Using the primary estimate for a use to access their electronic Form I–94.
internet access and printing a paper
traveler’s value of time, these costs for In 2013, CBP’s costs were $92,000.
copy of their electronic Form I–94. The
costs averaged $24.08 per traveler in these groups averaged $3.19 per person.
EXHIBIT 6—COST SUMMARY
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
CBP Costs
I–94 Air/Sea Systems Costs .................... 1,321,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 92,000
1 percent of B–1/B–2 travelers and 75 percent of 29 Internal Revenue Service. IR–2011–116,
non-B–1/B–2 travelers access the I–94 Web site. December 9, 2011. Available at http://www.irs.gov/
newsroom/article/0,,id=250882,00.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/16.svg)
![91662 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
EXHIBIT 6—COST SUMMARY—Continued
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
I–94 Land Systems Costs ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 540,000 0
Total CBP Costs ...................................... 1,321,000 92,000 92,000 92,000 632,000 92,000
Traveler Costs
Website Access Costs—Low ................... 0 5,061,648 9,328,146 9,788,098 10,206,792 10,767,432
Website Access Costs—Primary ............. 0 6,123,431 11,284,913 11,841,348 12,347,872 13,026,117
Website Access Costs—High .................. 0 7,592,473 13,992,220 14,682,147 15,310,188 16,151,148
Travel Time Costs .................................... 0 4,350,487 8,017,542 8,412,870 8,772,738 9,254,608
Mileage Costs .......................................... 0 4,932,626 9,090,369 9,538,597 9,946,618 10,492,967
Printing Costs ........................................... 0 520,071 958,443 1,005,702 1,048,722 1,106,326
Total Traveler Costs—Low ............... 0 14,864,832 27,394,501 28,745,266 29,974,870 31,621,333
Total Traveler Costs—Primary ......... 0 15,926,615 29,351,267 30,798,517 32,115,950 33,880,018
Total Traveler Costs—High .............. 0 17,395,656 32,058,574 33,639,315 35,078,266 37,005,049
Grand Total Costs—Low ........... 1,321,000 14,956,832 27,486,501 28,837,266 30,606,870 31,713,333
Grand Total Costs—Primary ..... 1,321,000 16,018,615 29,443,267 30,890,517 32,747,950 33,972,018
Grand Total Costs—High .......... 1,321,000 17,487,656 32,150,574 33,731,315 35,710,266 37,097,049
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
4. Benefits the form with the admission or parole secondary passenger inspections when
a. Benefits of Automation at Air and Sea stamp, notated the alien’s classification the traveler did not fill out a form in
Ports of Entry and duration of admission or parole and advance or when the traveler made an
stapled it to the traveler’s passport. The error in filling out the form. Prior to this
This rule has benefits for CBP, interim final rule eliminated this rule, CBP spent $153,360 each year
carriers, and travelers to the United process. printing the Form I–94 for air and sea
States. Prior to the implementation of A study of the processing times at travelers. Since the interim final rule’s
the interim final rule, CBP returned the three major U.S. airports immediately implementation, CBP no longer needs to
bottom portion of the Form I–94 to the following the implementation of the print the Form I–94 for most of these
traveler and retained the top portion of interim final rule yielded mixed results; travelers,30 which eliminates this
the form. The information on the top one airport showed a decrease in expense.
portion of the form was entered into processing time following the change in
CBP systems for use by CBP and other process, another showed an increase, Before the implementation of the
agencies. CBP also received this and the third showed no statistically interim final rule, carriers printed the
information electronically from other significant difference in processing Forms I–94 for their passengers to
sources. In 2012, CBP linked its data times. We note that CBP has since complete before their arrival in the
systems to create an electronic Form I– resolved some technical issues with the United States. To estimate printing costs
94, thus eliminating the need to user interface design of the system used for carriers, CBP obtained an estimate of
continue entering the data from the by CBP officers during primary total Form I–94 printing and storage
paper Form I–94 for air and sea travelers inspection that arose with the costs from a major airline. We increased
into CBP systems. Prior to the automated process. CBP has anecdotal this cost proportionally based on annual
implementation of the interim final rule, evidence that processing times have international inbound passenger
CBP spent approximately $17.8 million now dropped nationwide as a result of volumes to estimate the entire
per year on contract support for manual the transition to the automated Form I– industry’s cost to print and store paper
Form I–94 data entry. CBP still must 94 process. Forms I–94. Based on this methodology,
spend approximately $2.4 million in CBP is conducting a more CBP estimates that carriers spent
contract expenses to enter data from the comprehensive time study that will $1,344,450 annually to print and store
paper Forms I–94 collected at the land examine the entire time period the Form I–94. Since the interim final
border and the few that continue to be following the implementation of the rule’s implementation, carriers no
collected at airports and seaports. We automated process, but results of this longer need to print or store the Form
therefore estimate that this rule saves study are not yet available. Accordingly, I–94, which eliminates these expenses.
CBP $15.4 million each year in contract for the purposes of this analysis, we We next estimate the value of air and
costs. It is possible that these savings assume that this rule will not affect CBP sea travelers’ time savings resulting
could grow in future years if large processing times. To the extent that from the elimination of the paper Form
numbers of travelers at the land border eliminating the paper Form I–94 I–94. Prior to the implementation of the
opt for the voluntary electronic option. reduced processing times, CBP was able interim final rule, travelers spent 8
CBP processing has also become more to focus its resources on other areas, minutes filling out the Form I–94 while
efficient as a result of this rule. Prior to improving security and expediting the in transit to the United States. This rule
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
the implementation of the interim final processing of passengers. eliminates the paper Form I–94 for air
rule, when the traveler gave the We next examine the printing savings
and sea travelers and, with it, the 8-
completed Form I–94 to the CBP officer this rule generates for CBP and carriers.
during the inspection, the officer Prior to the implementation of the 30 CBP still prints a small number of forms for use
reviewed the form for errors and made interim final rule, both CBP and carriers at airports and seaports for certain aliens such as
corrections as needed. The officer then printed and stored Forms I–94. CBP asylees, certain parolees, and those who request a
stamped the top and bottom portions of printed forms for use in primary and paper Form I–94.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/17.svg)
![91664 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Form I–102 accrue primarily to non-B– non-B–1/B–2 travelers who no longer automation to each party. As shown,
1/B–2 travelers. Using the primary need to use a Form I–102 would achieve total benefits for this rule ranged from
estimate for a traveler’s value of time, an additional time and fee savings of $72.9 million to $100.2 million in 2013.
the time burden savings for all travelers $343.81 per traveler. Exhibit 9 In our primary estimate, the benefits of
is $5.89 per traveler. In addition, those summarizes the benefits of air and sea this rule were $84.3 million in 2013.
EXHIBIT 9—BENEFIT SUMMARY
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CBP Benefits:
CBP Contract Savings .................................................. 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000
CBP Printing Savings ................................................... 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360
Total CBP Benefits .............................................................. 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360
Carrier Printing Savings ....................................................... 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Traveler Benefits:
Form I–94 Time Savings—Low .................................... 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058
Form I–94 Time Savings—Primary .............................. 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225
I–94 Time Savings—High ............................................. 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087
Form I–102 Time Savings ............................................ 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841
Form I–102 Fee Savings .............................................. 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940
Total Traveler Benefits—Low .............................................. 55,974,446 104,380,892 109,343,146 113,860,294 119,908,839
Total Traveler Benefits—Primary ......................................... 67,429,647 125,491,760 131,494,947 136,959,658 144,277,007
Total Traveler Benefits—High .............................................. 83,278,624 154,699,947 162,143,329 168,919,051 177,991,868
Grand Total Benefits—Low .................................................. 72,872,256 121,278,702 126,240,956 130,758,104 136,806,649
Grand Total Benefits—Primary ............................................ 84,327,457 142,389,570 148,392,757 153,857,468 161,174,817
Grand Total Benefits—High ................................................. 100,176,434 171,597,757 179,041,139 185,816,861 194,889,678
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
b. Benefits From Electronic time of $44.15, the value of this time This process would save CBP 8
Implementation at the Land Border savings is $14.72 per traveler. As this minutes of data input time and 2
Under the new voluntary electronic process is just a few months old, CBP minutes of fee processing time, a total
I–94 submission process at the land does not have data on how many of 10 minutes of CBP officer time per
border, once the traveler arrives at the travelers will opt to answer the Form traveler. Based on the estimate that
port, he/she will go through secondary I–94 questions and pay the fee online. 350,000 travelers will opt for the
inspection, as they do under the paper CBP is engaging in public outreach to advance I–94 information submission
process, where the CBP officer will notify the public of the option, but only and payment, and using the fully loaded
locate the traveler’s information through travelers who have access to a computer wage rate of a CBP Officer of $85.47 per
a document swipe in CBP’s database. or other device with internet hour,34 we estimate that this process
This will indicate that the fee was paid connectivity will be able to participate. would save CBP officers 58,333 hours
and pre-populate the data fields from In 2015, nearly 7 million travelers and $4,985,750. We note that this is a
the document swipe and the arrived in the United States at the land time savings that is monetized for
information provided by the traveler in border using a Form I–94. CBP does not analytical purposes and not a budgetary
the Web site. Once the CBP officer has yet have sufficient data on how many savings. This time savings could be
determined the traveler’s admissibility, travelers will opt for the online fee
spent on other priorities including
the CBP officer will print out a paper payment option. For the purposes of
reducing wait times. In addition, this
I–94 to give to the traveler. The traveler this analysis, CBP estimates that 5
rule would reduce the amount of cash
will already have paid the fee, so once percent of these travelers, or
being handled at ports of entry, which
he/she has cleared the secondary approximately 350,000, will opt for the
advance I–94 information submission would simplify port of entry oversight
inspection he/she will be able to enter
and payment process, for a total savings and auditing.
the United States.
This voluntary process is purely to travelers of $5,152,000. To the extent c. Aggregate Benefits
beneficial to any traveler who opts into that the reduction in CBP officer time
it. By paying the fee online, the traveler inputting data and processing fees Exhibit 10 shows the total benefits of
avoids an average 20 minute wait to do results in shorter wait times, travelers the rule—both the benefits of air and sea
so at the port of entry. Using our would have additional time savings automation and the land border
primary estimate for the value of travel benefits. implementation.
EXHIBIT 10—BENEFIT SUMMARY
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CBP Benefits:
CBP Contract Savings .................................................. 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000 15,400,000
CBP Printing Savings ................................................... 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360 153,360
34 Source: CBP Position Model.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/19.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 91665
EXHIBIT 10—BENEFIT SUMMARY—Continued
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CBP Time Savings ....................................................... 0 0 0 1,246,438 4,985,750
Total CBP Benefits .............................................................. 15,553,360 15,553,360 15,553,360 16,799,798 20,539,110
Carrier Printing Savings ....................................................... 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Traveler Benefits:
Form I–94 Time Savings—Low .................................... 54,608,355 100,638,110 105,600,365 110,117,513 116,166,058
Form I–94 Time Savings—Primary .............................. 66,063,556 121,748,978 127,752,166 133,216,876 140,534,225
I–94 Time Savings—High ............................................. 81,912,532 150,957,166 158,400,547 165,176,269 174,249,087
Form I–102 Time Savings ............................................ 51,041 139,841 139,841 139,841 139,841
Form I–102 Fee Savings .............................................. 1,315,050 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940 3,602,940
Land Process Time Savings ......................................... 0 0 0 1,288,000 5,152,000
Total Traveler Benefits—Low .............................................. 55,974,446 104,380,892 109,343,146 115,148,294 125,060,839
Total Traveler Benefits—Primary ......................................... 67,429,647 125,491,760 131,494,947 138,247,658 149,429,007
Total Traveler Benefits—High .............................................. 83,278,624 154,699,947 162,143,329 170,207,051 183,143,868
Grand Total Benefits—Low .................................................. 72,872,256 121,278,702 126,240,956 133,292,542 146,944,399
Grand Total Benefits—Primary ............................................ 84,327,457 142,389,570 148,392,757 156,391,905 171,312,567
Grand Total Benefits—High ................................................. 100,176,434 171,597,757 179,041,139 188,351,298 205,027,428
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
5. Net Benefits CBP had a net benefit of $15.5 million, travelers was $51.3 million in 2013.
carriers had a net benefit of $1.3 Total 2013 net benefits ranged from
Exhibit 11 compares the costs of this million, and travelers had a net benefit $57.9 million to $82.7 million. In our
rule to the benefits, both in total and for of between $41.1 and $65.9 million. In primary analysis, the total net benefits
each party affected. As shown, in 2013, our primary analysis, the net benefit to were $68.3 million in 2013.
EXHIBIT 11—NET BENEFITS
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CBP .......................................................... ¥1,321,000 15,461,360 15,461,360 15,461,360 16,167,798 20,447,110
Carriers .................................................... 0 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450 1,344,450
Travelers—Low ........................................ 0 41,109,614 76,986,391 80,597,880 85,173,424 93,439,507
Travelers—Primary .................................. 0 51,503,032 96,140,493 100,696,430 106,131,707 115,548,989
Travelers—High ....................................... 0 65,882,967 122,641,373 128,504,014 135,128,784 146,138,820
Grand Total—Low .................................... ¥1,321,000 57,915,424 93,792,201 97,403,690 102,685,671 115,231,067
Grand Total—Primary .............................. ¥1,321,000 68,308,842 112,946,303 117,502,240 123,643,955 137,340,549
Grand Total—High ................................... ¥1,321,000 82,688,777 139,447,183 145,309,824 152,641,032 167,930,380
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
Exhibits 12 and 13 present the present annualized net benefits at the 3 and 7 annualized net benefits range from
value net benefits of this rule, percent discount rates. Total annualized $88.1 million to $90.9 million,
discounted at the 3 and 7 percent net benefits range from $73.4 million to depending on the discount rate used.
discount rates. Exhibit 14 presents $111.8 million. In the primary analysis,
EXHIBIT 12—NET BENEFITS DISCOUNTED AT A 3 PERCENT RATE
[2012 $] *
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CBP .......................................................... ¥1,321,000 15,011,029 14,573,815 14,149,335 14,364,879 17,637,857
Carriers .................................................... 0 1,305,291 1,267,273 1,230,362 1,194,526 1,159,734
Travelers—Low ........................................ 0 39,912,246 72,567,057 73,758,478 75,675,484 80,601,739
Travelers—Primary .................................. 0 50,002,944 90,621,635 92,151,498 94,296,647 99,673,573
Travelers—High ....................................... 0 63,964,046 115,601,256 117,599,376 120,060,175 126,060,630
Grand Total—Low .................................... ¥1,321,000 56,228,567 88,408,145 89,138,174 91,234,889 99,399,330
Grand Total—Primary .............................. ¥1,321,000 66,319,264 106,462,723 107,531,195 109,856,052 118,471,164
Grand Total—High ................................... ¥1,321,000 80,280,366 131,442,344 132,979,073 135,619,580 144,858,221
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/20.svg)
![91666 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
EXHIBIT 13—NET BENEFITS DISCOUNTED AT A 7 PERCENT RATE
[2012 $] *
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CBP .......................................................... ¥1,321,000 14,449,869 13,504,551 12,621,075 12,334,335 14,578,507
Carriers .................................................... 0 1,256,495 1,174,295 1,097,472 1,025,674 958,574
Travelers—Low ........................................ 0 38,420,200 67,242,895 65,791,878 64,978,397 66,621,077
Travelers—Primary .................................. 0 48,133,675 83,972,830 82,198,282 80,967,371 82,384,832
Travelers—High ....................................... 0 61,572,866 107,119,725 104,897,553 103,089,103 104,194,959
Grand Total—Low .................................... ¥1,321,000 54,126,564 81,921,741 79,510,425 78,338,407 82,158,158
Grand Total—Primary .............................. ¥1,321,000 63,840,039 98,651,675 95,916,829 94,327,381 97,921,913
Grand Total—High ................................... ¥1,321,000 77,279,231 121,798,570 118,616,100 116,449,112 119,732,040
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
EXHIBIT 14—ANNUALIZED NET BENEFITS DISCOUNTED AT 3 PERCENT AND 7 PERCENT
[2012 $] *
3 Percent 7 Percent
CBP .......................................................................................................................................................................... 13,336,885 12,973,485
Carriers .................................................................................................................................................................... 1,103,496 1,080,843
Travelers—Low ........................................................................................................................................................ 61,385,839 59,420,140
Travelers—Primary .................................................................................................................................................. 76,481,844 74,047,524
Travelers—High ....................................................................................................................................................... 97,368,099 94,285,410
Grand Total—Low .................................................................................................................................................... 75,826,220 73,474,468
Grand Total—Primary .............................................................................................................................................. 90,922,226 88,101,852
Grand Total—High ................................................................................................................................................... 111,808,481 108,339,738
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
While this rule has a large net benefit percent of other foreign travelers who of $20.89 per traveler. We reiterate that
to travelers as a whole, it is important need to access the Web site experience those with obstacles to accessing their
to note that the net benefits do not a cost of $2.95 per person because of the electronic Forms I–94 may request a
accrue uniformly across all travelers. 4 minute time burden to access the Web paper Form I–94 at secondary
We next examine the effect of this rule site. In addition, those who need to inspection stations at ports of entry or
on each type of traveler. Exhibit 14 print their Form I–94 incur a $0.25 at CBP DIS. In addition, any travelers
summarizes the costs and benefits per printing cost. Those temporary workers who would otherwise need to file a
traveler for each class of alien discussed and aliens in the ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ Form I–102 and pay the $330 fee to
in this analysis. With this rule, no category who need to travel to access obtain a replacement Form I–94 receive
traveler needs to fill out the paper Form the Web site and print their Form I–94
an additional benefit of $342.81 as a
I–94 while en route to the United States, have an additional travel cost. They
result of this rule. Travelers who opt for
saving all travelers 8 minutes, an need to travel an estimated 20 miles and
the electronic filing option receive an
estimated $5.89 per traveler. The 1 60 minutes round-trip to reach a
percent of B–1/B–2 travelers and 75 location with internet access, at a cost additional benefit of $14.72.
EXHIBIT 15—ANNUAL EFFECT OF RULE BY CLASS OF ALIEN
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
Cost of time to
access & cost
8 minute time to print Travel costs Net impact **
cost savings electronic
Form I–94
Travelers who do not Access Website ............................................................ 5.89 0 0 5.89
1 percent of Tourists and Business Travelers (B–1/B–2) ............................... 5.89 ¥3.19 0 2.70
75 percent of Students .................................................................................... 5.89 ¥3.19 0 2.70
75 percent of Temporary workers ................................................................... 5.89 ¥3.19 ¥20.89 ¥18.21
75 percent of Other/Unknown ......................................................................... 5.89 ¥3.19 ¥20.89 ¥18.21
75 percent of Diplomats .................................................................................. 5.89 ¥3.19 0 2.70
* Estimates may not total due to rounding.
** In addition to this net impact, a small number of travelers experience savings resulting from no longer needing to file a Form I–102. The pri-
mary estimate of Form I–102 cost savings to travelers is $342.81 per traveler. We do not include the Form I–102 cost savings in the net impact
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
column of Exhibit 14 because few travelers benefit from this compared to the overall population of travelers impacted by the rule. Based on data
from USCIS, we estimate that 10,918 Form I–102s per year are no longer need to be filed as a result of this rule. This is far less than one per-
cent of the annual population of travelers affected by the rule (10,918 Form I–102s ÷ 20,815,527 travelers in 2014 <1%).
Annualized costs and benefits to all domestic or foreign, are presented in the
entities affected by the rule, whether following accounting statement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/21.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 91667
ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES FOR U.S. ENTITIES, 2012–2017
[2012 $]
3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate
U.S. Costs:
Annualized monetized costs ...................... $23.5 million ..................................................... $21.0 million.
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized None ................................................................. None.
costs.
Qualitative (non-quantified) costs ............... None ................................................................. None.
U.S. Benefits:
Annualized monetized benefits .................. $104.1 million ................................................... $101.1 million.
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized None ................................................................. None.
benefits.
Qualitative (non-quantified) benefits .......... Reduced primary inspection processing times Reduced primary inspection processing times.
We estimate annualized costs to all all entities. Non-quantified benefits of Annualized costs and benefits to U.S.
entities affected by this rule to range this rule include the reduced processing entities are presented in the following
from $21.0 million to $23.5 million. time that could result because of the accounting statement, as required by
Monetized benefits of this rule range automation of the Form I–94. OMB Circular A–4.
from $101.9 million to $104.1 million to
ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES FOR U.S. ENTITIES, 2012–2017
[2012 $]
3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate
U.S. Costs:
Annualized monetized costs ...................... $0.454 million ................................................... $0.466 million.
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized None ................................................................. None.
costs.
Qualitative (non-quantified) costs ............... None ................................................................. None.
U.S. Benefits:
Annualized monetized benefits .................. $13.5 million ..................................................... $13.3 million.
Annualized quantified, but non-monetized None ................................................................. None.
benefits.
Qualitative (non-quantified) benefits .......... Reduced primary inspection processing times Reduced primary inspection processing times.
We estimate annualized costs to U.S. print their electronic Form I–94 prior to the purpose of obtaining a paper Form
entities as a result of this rule to range leaving the airport. I–94. This may be because the travelers
from $0.454 million to $0.466 million. Under alternative one, if CBP were to who need a paper Form I–94 do not
These are CBP’s costs for automating the eliminate the paper Form I–94 entirely know they need it when at the airport
electronic Form I–94 and developing the in the air and sea environments, there or because they find it more efficient to
Web site travelers use to access their are certain classes of vulnerable aliens access the I–94 Web site and print the
electronic Form I–94. Monetized who would be harmed. Under the rule, form than to go to secondary inspection
benefits of this rule of $13.3 million to asylees and certain parolees are or a DIS. Requesting a paper Form I–94
$13.5 million to U.S. entities (CBP and provided a paper Form I–94. These at one of these locations can take longer
carriers) represent reduced Form I–94 aliens have an immediate need for the than the 4 minutes we estimate it takes
printing and storage costs, reduced data Form I–94 and cannot wait to access to access the I–94 Web site and the 60
entry contract costs, and reduced time their electronic Form I–94 from the Web minutes in travel time we estimate that
costs for CBP officers. Non-quantified site. These aliens represent a very small those with obstacles to internet access
benefits of this rule include the reduced portion of overall international travel spend to obtain their Form I–94. As few
processing time that could result and providing them with a paper Form aliens request a paper Form I–94 at
because of the automation of the Form I–94 and entering the information into secondary inspection stations or DIS,
I–94. CBP data systems is not a significant the cost to CBP for printing and data
cost to CBP. In addition, under this rule, entry for these forms is minimal.
6. Regulatory Alternatives CBP has continued to make the paper Eliminating the paper Form I–94 option
In the analysis for the interim final Form I–94 available to those travelers for asylees, certain parolees, and those
rule, we considered two alternatives to who request it at secondary inspection travelers who request one would not
the rule: (1) Eliminating the paper Form stations and at DIS. CBP provides this result in a significant cost savings to
I–94 in the air and sea environments flexibility as a way to minimize the CBP and would burden travelers who
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
entirely and (2) providing the paper effect on those who face obstacles to have an immediate need for an
Form I–94 to all travelers who are not accessing their electronic Form I–94. electronic Form I–94 or who face
B–1/B–2 travelers. As a result of public CBP does not have statistics on the obstacles to accessing their electronic
comments on the interim final rule, we number of travelers who request a paper Form I–94.
add a third alternative to our analysis: Form I–94. Anecdotal evidence suggests Under alternative two, all non-B–1/B–
(3) Providing kiosks at major ports of that few, if any, travelers go to a 2 travelers required to complete a Form
entry where travelers have the option to secondary inspection station or a DIS for I–94 would receive and complete the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/22.svg)
![91668 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
paper Form I–94 during their inspection considered this suggestion and made it been because of erroneous data on their
when they arrive in the United States. an additional alternative to the rule. Form I–94, but it could also be because
The electronic Form I–94 would still be Under alternative three, we consider they did not actually have an Form I–
automatically created during inspection, the costs and benefits of placing kiosks 94 on the Web site (for example, if they
but the CBP officer would need to verify at the busiest U.S. airports and seaports are a U.S. citizen or if they already
that the information appearing on the to allow travelers to inspect and print departed the country prior to accessing
form matches the information in CBP’s their electronic Form I–94 before the Web site).
data systems. In addition, CBP would leaving the port of entry. For the
Accessing the Web site via a kiosk
need to write the Form I–94 number on purposes of this alternative analysis, we
would take 4 minutes of a traveler’s
each paper Form I–94 so that their paper examine the impact of placing dedicated
time, the same amount of time as via a
form matches the electronic record. As kiosks at the busiest 20 airports and the
personal computer. Therefore, we do
noted earlier, over four million, or 23.7 busiest 20 seaports. These locations
not believe that those who do not
percent, aliens were non-B–1/B–2 account for 92 percent of international
currently access their electronic Forms
travelers in 2012. Filling out and air travelers and 95 percent of
I–94 (as stated earlier, this includes the
processing this many paper Forms I–94 international sea travelers.35
CBP uses kiosks at many major 99 percent of B–1/B–2 travelers and 25
at airports and seaports would increase percent of non-B–1/B–2 travelers)
processing times considerably and it airports for the Global Entry program.
These kiosks are dedicated for use by would now access them via the kiosks.
would only provide at best small Similarly, those with easy computer
savings to the individual traveler. As members of that program, but similar
kiosks could be purchased to allow access would experience no time
noted in the ‘‘Net Benefits’’ section, the savings by accessing their Form I–94 via
net cost of this rule to the 75 percent of travelers to access the I–94 Web site and
print their Form I–94. According to the kiosk instead of via the Web site, so
temporary workers and those in the we do not include their benefits in the
‘‘Other/Unknown’’ category of aliens CBP’s Office of Field Operations, kiosks
would cost $20,000 each and have an analysis. The travelers who would
who need a printed Form I–94 is only benefit from the availability of kiosks to
$18.20 per traveler. Conversely, this rule annual operations and maintenance cost
of $8,732. Placing a kiosk at each of the access their electronic Form I–94 are
provides net benefits to travelers who those who would otherwise need to
do not need a printed Form I–94 and busiest 20 airports and the busiest 20
seaports would cost $800,000 the first travel to access the internet. These
those arriving as students or diplomats. travelers would no longer incur the
year and $349,280 in each subsequent
CBP received several public years. opportunity cost of traveling 60 minutes
comments related to the obstacles The benefit of placing kiosks at the or the mileage cost of driving 20 miles
travelers face in accessing a computer to busiest airports and seaports depends roundtrip. In our analysis above, we
print their electronic Form I–94. on the number of people who would use have estimated that 33 percent of
Commenters said that many travelers the kiosks if they were available. CBP travelers in the ‘‘Temporary Workers’’
need their Form I–94 very soon after has no data on the extent to which and ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ categories of
arrival, sometimes within hours of travelers would choose to use the kiosks travelers would need to travel to access
arrival, and they may have difficulty if they were available to them. As stated the internet. In 2014 (the first full year
learning that public libraries offer previously, few travelers request paper the interim final rule is in effect) this
internet access, where public libraries Forms I–94 upon their arrival in the represents approximately 819,000
are, and how to travel to a public United States, but that might be because travelers. Since we do not know how
library. An employer submitted a doing so means going to the secondary many of these travelers would choose to
comment stating that company privacy inspection station, which can take a use the kiosks, we present the costs and
standards prevent it from allowing new considerable amount of time. We also benefits (using the primary estimates for
hires to access the internet in order to do not know how many people find travel and mileage costs) that would
access the I–94 Web site. Separately, errors on their electronic Forms I–94 accrue to these travelers under a wide
commenters pointed out problems with that they could correct immediately if range of assumptions of their kiosk use.
the accuracy of the Form I–94 they were already at an airport or The benefits reflect the total travel costs,
information that prevent them from seaport rather than visiting a Deferred including travel time and mileage,
logging into the Web site. Others noted Inspection Site at a later time, though derived earlier in the analysis (See
that there is no way to check their Form data suggests this could be a large Exhibit 5). We present the reduction in
I–94 for accuracy at time of entry into number. In 2013, according to an travel costs (which is a benefit) that
the United States. One commenter analysis of data provided by CBP’s would result if different percentages of
suggested a solution to these problems: Office of Field Operations, about 14 travelers use a kiosk rather than travel
That CBP provide kiosks at the airports percent of unique visitors to the I–94 to a location where they can access the
where foreign nationals can inspect and Web site were not able to locate their internet. The results of our analysis are
print their electronic Form I–94. CBP electronic Form I–94. This may have presented in Exhibit 16.
EXHIBIT 16—COMPARISON OF KIOSK COSTS AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
Kiosk use
rate * 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(%)
Benefits .................................................... 100 9,283,113 17,107,912 17,951,467 18,719,357 19,747,575
75 6,962,334 12,830,934 13,463,600 14,039,517 14,810,681
50 4,641,556 8,553,956 8,975,733 9,359,678 9,873,788
35 CBP’s Operations Management Reporting
database. Accessed June 30, 2014.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/23.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 91669
EXHIBIT 16—COMPARISON OF KIOSK COSTS AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS—Continued
[Undiscounted 2012$] *
Kiosk use
rate * 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
(%)
25 2,320,778 4,276,978 4,487,867 4,679,839 4,936,894
10 928,311 1,710,791 1,795,147 1,871,936 1,974,758
5 464,156 855,396 897,573 935,968 987,379
1 92,831 171,079 179,515 187,194 197,476
CBP Costs ............................................... ........................ ........................ 800,000 329,280 329,280 329,280
* Note that Kiosk Use Rate represents the percentage of those who would otherwise need to travel to access a computer, not total Form I–94
travelers. Only approximately 4 percent of total Form I–94 travelers need to travel to access the Web site (12 percent of travelers in the ‘‘Tem-
porary Worker’’ or ‘‘Other/Unknown’’ categories times 33 percent of those categories who would need to travel to access the internet = 4
percent).
As shown in Exhibit 15, kiosks have for those travelers. Employers who have average passenger. We therefore do not
a large potential for benefits if they are internet access may choose to allow believe that this rule has a significant
used by a substantial number of their employees to use their internet economic impact on small entities. We
travelers. If 100 percent of travelers who connection to access the employee’s also note that any impact to small
would otherwise need to travel to access electronic Form I–94, but they are not carriers would be purely beneficial.
a computer used the kiosks instead, required to do so and are therefore not
benefits would outpace the costs of the directly regulated by this rule. To the Privacy
kiosks by a margin of $17.2 million to extent an employer chooses to assist an CBP will ensure that all Privacy Act
$0.8 million in 2014 and by more in employee with accessing the internet requirements and policies are adhered
later years. Even if only 5 percent of and printing a Form I–94, this impact to in the implementation of this rule,
travelers who would otherwise need to would not rise to being an economically and will be updating the Privacy Impact
travel to access a computer use the significant impact under the Regulatory Assessment (PIA) for the I–94 Web site.
kiosks, benefits would exceed costs. Flexibility Act. CBP will outline in the updated PIA
However, based on CBP’s experience This rule also regulates air and sea how CBP will ensure compliance with
with travelers requesting paper Forms I– carriers by eliminating the need for Privacy Act protections. In the updated
94 at the ports of entry, CBP does not them to provide the paper Form I–94 to PIA, CBP will explain the privacy risks
believe enough travelers would use the their passengers. This rule would and mitigations CBP has implemented
kiosks to merit the expense. Further, impact all small carriers that transport during this phase of the Form I–94
due to budget constraints, CBP does not passengers to the United States. We automation process. DHS/CBP will post
have funds to acquire these kiosks at therefore conclude that this rule has an the updated PIA online at: http://
this time. impact on a substantial number of small www.dhs.gov/privacy-documents-us-
The Regulatory Flexibility Act entities. customs-and-border-protection. The PIA
As stated in the economic impact that covers the earlier phase of Form I–
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 analysis above, we estimate that carriers
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended by the 94 automation, and describes how CBP
spend $1.3 million a year printing and complies with the Privacy Act, is
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement storing forms for their passengers, based
and Fairness Act of 1996, requires an available at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/
on 2011 passenger volumes. In 2011, default/files/publications/privacy/PIAs/
agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility 16,586,753 Forms I–94 provided by
analysis that describes the effect of a pia-cbp-16-I-94-automation-
carriers were filed at airports and 20130227.pdf.
proposed rule on small entities when seaports. Dividing these figures, we
the agency is required to publish a estimate that carriers spent 8 cents per Paperwork Reduction Act
general notice of proposed rulemaking. form on printing and storage costs.
A small entity may be a small business Under this rule, carriers would no The collection of information
(defined as any independently owned longer need to print and store the Forms regarding the CBP Form I–94 (Arrival/
and operated business not dominant in I–94, thus eliminating these costs. Departure Record) was previously
its field that qualifies as a small According to a 2013 study by the reviewed and approved by OMB in
business per the Small Business Act); a Department of Commerce’s Office of accordance with the requirements of the
small not-for-profit organization; or a Travel and Tourism Industries,36 the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
small governmental jurisdiction average airline ticket price for an U.S.C. 3507) under OMB Control
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people). international traveler traveling to the Number 1651–0111. This OMB Control
Since a notice of proposed rulemaking United States is $1,588. The cost to the Number also includes the Electronic
was not necessary, a regulatory carrier of printing a Form I–94 is less System for Travel Authorization
flexibility analysis was not required. than one hundredth of one percent of (ESTA), ESTA fee, and Form I–94W, all
Nonetheless, DHS has considered the the revenue a carrier receives from the of which are unaffected by this rule. In
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
impact of this rule on small entities. addition, information for the electronic
This rule primarily regulates 36 Department of Commerce, National Travel and Form I–94 is comprised of information
individuals and individuals are not Tourism Office. ‘‘Profile of Overseas Travelers to already collected for APIS under
considered small entities. In addition, the United States: 2013 Inbound.’’ Available at approval 1651–0088. An agency may
http://travel.trade.gov/outreachpages/
the individual travelers may obtain a download_data_table/
not conduct, and a person is not
paper Form I–94 upon request, which 2013_Overseas_Visitor_Profile.pdf. Accessed July required to respond to, a collection of
would eliminate the impacts of this rule 10, 2014. information unless the collection of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/24.svg)
![91670 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
information displays a valid control Passengers may log into the Web site 10,918 Forms I–102, Application for
number assigned by OMB. using 7 pieces of basic identifying Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant
The burden hours associated with the information that is either known to the Arrival-Departure Document, filed, and
collections of information contained in traveler (their first name, last name and an estimated reduction of 4,541.89
this Final Rule were previously date of birth) or readily available on burden hours under OMB control
reviewed and approved by OMB. The their passport (passport number, number 1615–0079.
automation of the paper Form I–94 for country of issuance, date of entry, and Exhibit 16 summarizes the difference
commercial aircraft and vessel class of admission). The estimated in the burden for the previous process
passengers in accordance with this Final annual burden associated with this Web and the process under this rule. As
Rule results in a reduction of 1,278,456 site, is 254,680 hours under OMB OMB Control Number 1651–0111
annual burden hours under OMB control number 1651–0111. includes ESTA and Form I–94W, we
control number 1651–0111. The automation of the paper Form include those burden hours for
Also in accordance with this Final I–94 for commercial aircraft and vessel informational purposes. We note that
Rule, the electronic Form I–94 is passengers in accordance with this Final these burden hours are unaffected by
available to aliens on a secure Web site. Rule results in an estimated reduction of this rule.
EXHIBIT 16—PRA BURDEN EFFECTS OF THE RULE
Collection Respondents Burden Hours
Pre-IFR ........................................................................................ I–94 .................................................... 14,000,000 1,862,000
Website .............................................. 0 0
I–102 .................................................. 17,700 7,363
ESTA .................................................. 19,140,000 4,785,000
I–94W ................................................. 100,000 333,147
Final Rule .................................................................................... I–94 .................................................... 4,387,550 583,544
Website .............................................. 3,858,782 254,680
I–102 .................................................. 6,782 2,821
ESTA .................................................. 19,140,000 4,785,000
I–94W ................................................. 100,000 13,333
Difference .................................................................................... I–94 .................................................... ¥9,612,450 ¥1,278,456
Website .............................................. 3,858,782 254,680
I–102 .................................................. ¥10,918 ¥4,542
ESTA .................................................. 0 0
I–94W ................................................. 0 0
Amendments to the Regulations compliance date for new meat and Patriots Plaza 3, 355 E Street SW., Room
For the reasons set forth above, the poultry product labeling regulations that 8–163A, Washington, DC 20250–3700.
interim final rule amending 8 CFR parts are issued between January 1, 2017, and Instructions: All items submitted by
1, 210, 212, 214, 215, 231, 235, 245, December 31, 2018. FSIS periodically mail or electronic mail must include the
245a, 247, 253, 264, 274a, and 286, announces uniform compliance dates Agency name and docket number FSIS–
published at 78 FR 18457 on March 27, for new meat and poultry product 2016–0048. Comments received in
2013, is adopted as a final rule without labeling regulations to minimize the response to this docket will be made
change. economic impact of label changes. available for public inspection and
DATES: This rule is effective December posted without change, including any
Jeh Charles Johnson, 19, 2016. Comments on this final rule personal information, to http://
Secretary. must be received on or before January www.regulations.gov/.
[FR Doc. 2016–30459 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] 18, 2017. Docket: For access to background
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P ADDRESSES: FSIS invites interested documents or comments received, go to
persons to submit relevant comments on the FSIS Docket Room at Patriots Plaza
this final rule. Comments may be 3, 355 E Street SW., Room 8–164,
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE submitted by the following methods: Washington, DC 20250–3700 between
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: This 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
Food Safety and Inspection Service Web site provides the ability to type through Friday.
short comments directly into the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
9 CFR Parts 317 and 381 comment field on this Web page or Rosalyn Murphy-Jenkins, Director,
[Docket No. FSIS–2016–0048] attach a file for lengthier comments. Go Labeling and Program Delivery Division,
to http://www.regulations.gov/. Follow Office of Policy and Program
RIN 0583–AD05 the online instructions at that site for Development, Food Safety and
submitting comments. Inspection Service, U.S. Department of
Uniform Compliance Date for Food
• Mail, including CD–ROMs: Send to Agriculture, Telephone: 301–504–0879.
Labeling Regulations
Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Agriculture (USDA), FSIS, OPPD,
Patriots Plaza 3, 1400 Independence Background
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule. Avenue SW., Mailstop 3782, Room 8– FSIS periodically issues regulations
163A, Washington, DC 20250–3700. that require changes in the labeling of
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and • Hand- or courier-delivered items: meat and poultry food products. Many
Inspection Service (FSIS) is establishing Send to Docket Clerk, U.S. Department meat and poultry establishments also
January 1, 2020, as the uniform of Agriculture (USDA), FSIS, OPPD, produce non-meat and non-poultry food
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:05 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91889/page/25.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-17 03:15:12
Document Modified: 2016-12-17 03:15:12
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective January 18, 2017. | |
| Contact | Suzanne Shepherd, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operations by telephone (202) 344- 2073 or by email, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 91646 | |
| RIN Number | 1651-AA96 | |
| CFR Citation | 8
CFR
1 8 CFR 210 8 CFR 212 8 CFR 214 8 CFR 215 8 CFR 231 8 CFR 235 8 CFR 245 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR