81 FR 91898 - Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 243 (December 19, 2016)

Page Range		91898-91899
FR Document		2016-30199

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve administrative revisions for incorporation into the Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP). The submittal, by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on December 21, 2015, makes minor corrections to Michigan's Air Pollution Control Rules entitled ``Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous.''

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 243 (Monday, December 19, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 91898-91899]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0845; FRL-9956-61-Region 5]


Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve administrative revisions for incorporation into the Michigan's 
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The submittal, by the Michigan 
Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on December 21, 2015, makes 
minor corrections to Michigan's Air Pollution Control Rules entitled 
``Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous.''

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2015-0845 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to 
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the 
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental 
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6031, hatten.charles@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving Michigan's SIP submittal as a direct final 
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If EPA does not receive adverse comments in response to this 
rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 
comments, EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and will

[[Page 91899]]

address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule based 
on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. 
Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at 
this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an 
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule, and if that provision 
can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final 
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse 
comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: December 2, 2016.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2016-30199 Filed 12-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

91898 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules

submitted to the Office of Management Executive Order. This action is not Implementation Plan (SIP). The
and Budget (OMB) for review. subject to Executive Order 13045 submittal, by the Michigan Department
because it does not impose additional of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
requirements beyond those imposed by December 21, 2015, makes minor
This action does not impose an state law. corrections to Michigan’s Air Pollution
information collection burden under the Control Rules entitled ‘‘Emission
PRA because this action does not H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Limitations and Prohibitions—
impose additional requirements beyond Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Miscellaneous.’’
those imposed by state law. Distribution, or Use
DATES: Comments must be received on
This action is not subject to Executive or before January 18, 2017.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) Order 13211, because it is not a
I certify that this action will not have ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
significant regulatory action under
a significant economic impact on a identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
Executive Order 12866.
substantial number of small entities OAR–2015–0845 at http://
under the RFA. This action will not I. National Technology Transfer and www.regulations.gov or via email to
impose any requirements on small Advancement Act (NTTAA) blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments
entities beyond those imposed by state Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
law. the EPA to use voluntary consensus online instructions for submitting
standards in its regulatory activities comments. Once submitted, comments
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act unless to do so would be inconsistent cannot be edited or removed from
(UMRA) with applicable law or otherwise Regulations.gov. For either manner of
This action does not contain any impractical. The EPA believes that this submission, EPA may publish any
unfunded mandate as described in action is not subject to the requirements comment received to its public docket.
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because Do not submit electronically any
not significantly or uniquely affect small application of those requirements would information you consider to be
governments. This action does not be inconsistent with the CAA. Confidential Business Information (CBI)
impose additional requirements beyond or other information whose disclosure is
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal restricted by statute. Multimedia
those imposed by state law.
Actions To Address Environmental submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
Accordingly, no additional costs to
Justice in Minority Populations and accompanied by a written comment.
State, local, or tribal governments, or to
Low-Income Population The written comment is considered the
the private sector, will result from this
action. The EPA lacks the discretionary official comment and should include
authority to address environmental discussion of all points you wish to
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism justice in this rulemaking. make. EPA will generally not consider
This action does not have federalism comments or comment contents located
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 outside of the primary submission (i.e.
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the Environmental protection, Air on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
relationship between the national pollution control, Incorporation by system). For additional submission
government and the states, or on the reference, Intergovernmental relations, methods, please contact the person
distribution of power and New Source Review, Ozone, Particulate identified in the ‘‘For Further
responsibilities among the various matter, Reporting and recordkeeping Information Contact’’ section. For the
levels of government. requirements, Volatile organic full EPA public comment policy,
compounds. information about CBI or multimedia
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination submissions, and general guidance on
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
With Indian Tribal Governments making effective comments, please visit
Dated: December 8, 2016. http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
This action does not have tribal
Alexis Strauss, commenting-epa-dockets.
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the SIP is not Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
approved to apply on any Indian [FR Doc. 2016–30327 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] Charles Hatten, Environmental
reservation land or in any other area BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has Programs Branch (AR–18J),
demonstrated that a tribe has Environmental Protection Agency,
jurisdiction, and will not impose ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
substantial direct costs on tribal AGENCY Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031,
governments or preempt tribal law. hatten.charles@epa.gov.
40 CFR Part 52 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action. [EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0845; FRL–9956–61– Final Rules section of this Federal
Region 5] Register, EPA is approving Michigan’s
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of SIP submittal as a direct final rule
Children From Environmental Health Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 9 without prior proposal because the
Risks and Safety Risks Miscellaneous Rules Agency views this as a noncontroversial
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

The EPA interprets Executive Order AGENCY: Environmental Protection submittal and anticipates no adverse
13045 as applying only to those Agency (EPA). comments. A detailed rationale for the
regulatory actions that concern ACTION: Proposed rule. approval is set forth in the direct final
environmental health or safety risks that rule. If EPA does not receive adverse
the EPA has reason to believe may SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection comments in response to this rule, no
disproportionately affect children, per Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve further activity is contemplated. If EPA
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory administrative revisions for receives adverse comments, EPA will
action’’ in section 2–202 of the incorporation into the Michigan’s State withdraw the direct final rule and will

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:29 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM 19DEP1

$Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules 91899 address all public comments received in FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS December 8, 2016. The full text of the a subsequent final rule based on this COMMISSION Petition is available for viewing and proposed rule. EPA will not institute a copying at the FCC Reference second comment period. Any parties 47 CFR Parts 10 and 11 Information Center, 445 12th Street SW., interested in commenting on this action [PS Docket No. 15–91, PS Docket No. 15– Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. should do so at this time. Please note 94; Report No. 3061] It also may be accessed online via the that if EPA receives adverse comment Commission’s Electronic Comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section Petition for Reconsideration of Action Filing System at: https://www.fcc.gov/ of this rule, and if that provision can be in Rulemaking Proceeding ecfs/filing/10919110011734/document/ severed from the remainder of the rule, AGENCY: Federal Communications 10919110011734e7d2. The Commission EPA may adopt as final those provisions Commission. will not send a copy of this document of the rule that are not the subject of an pursuant to the Congressional Review ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. adverse comment. For additional Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this information, see the direct final rule SUMMARY: A Petition for Reconsideration document does not have an impact on which is located in the Rules section of (Petition) has been filed in the any rules of particular applicability. this Federal Register. Commission’s rulemaking proceeding Subject: Wireless Emergency Alerts; by Brian M. Josef, on behalf of CTIA. Amendments to part 11 of the Dated: December 2, 2016. DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must Commission’s Rules Regarding the Robert A. Kaplan, be filed on or before January 3, 2017. Emergency Alert System, FCC 16–127, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. Replies to an opposition must be filed Report and Order, in PS Docket Nos. [FR Doc. 2016–30199 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] on or before January 13, 2017. 15–91 and 15–94, published at 81 FR BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 75710, November 1, 2016. This Commission, 445 12th Street SW., document is being published pursuant Washington, DC 20554. to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g). James Wiley, Public Safety and Number of Petitions Filed: 1. Homeland Security Bureau, phone: (202) 418–1678; email: James.Wiley@ Federal Communications Commission. fcc.gov. Marlene H. Dortch, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a Secretary. summary of the Commission’s [FR Doc. 2016–30168 Filed 12–16–16; 8:45 am] document, Report No. 3061, released BILLING CODE 6712–01–P sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:29 Dec 16, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM 19DEP1$

Document Created: 2016-12-17 03:15:05
Document Modified: 2016-12-17 03:15:05

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Proposed rule.
Dates		Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2017.
Contact		Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6031, [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 91898