81_FR_93909 81 FR 93664 - Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's Republic of China and Mexico: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders

81 FR 93664 - Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's Republic of China and Mexico: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 245 (December 21, 2016)

Page Range93664-93665
FR Document2016-30653

As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') and the International Trade Commission (the ``ITC'') that revocation of the antidumping duty (``AD'') orders on seamless refined copper pipe and tube (``copper pipe and tube'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') and Mexico would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing this notice of continuation of the AD orders.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 245 (Wednesday, December 21, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 93664-93665]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-964; A-201-838]


Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's Republic 
of China and Mexico: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of 
Commerce (the ``Department'') and the International Trade Commission 
(the ``ITC'') that revocation of the antidumping duty (``AD'') orders 
on seamless refined copper pipe and tube (``copper pipe and tube'') 
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') and Mexico would likely 
lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to 
an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing this 
notice of continuation of the AD orders.

DATES: Effective December 21, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Galantucci, 202-482-2923, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On November 22, 2010, the Department published the AD orders on 
copper pipe and tube from the PRC and Mexico.\1\ On October 1, 2015, 
the Department initiated \2\ and the ITC instituted \3\ five-year 
(sunset) reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''). As a result of its 
reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the Orders would 
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping.\4\ The 
Department, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the dumping 
margins likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked.\5\ On December 
8, 2016, the ITC published its determination that revocation of the 
Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from Mexico and 
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value from Mexico, 75 
FR 71070 (November 22, 2010) (``Orders'').
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 59133 
(October 1, 2015).
    \3\ See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from China and 
Mexico; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 80 FR 59186 (October 1, 
2015).
    \4\ See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's 
Republic of China and Mexico: Preliminary Results of the Sunset 
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 4252 (January 26, 
2016) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum; Seamless 
Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's Republic of China and 
Mexico: Final Results of the Full Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping 
Duty Orders, 81 FR 38134 (June 13, 2016).
    \5\ Id.
    \6\ See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From China and 
Mexico; Determination, 81 FR 88704 (December 8, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    For the purpose of the Orders, the products covered are all 
seamless circular refined copper pipes and tubes, including redraw 
hollows, greater than or equal to six inches (152.4 mm) in length and 
measuring less than 12.130 inches (308.102 mm) (actual) in outside 
diameter (``OD''), regardless of wall thickness, bore (e.g., smooth, 
enhanced with inner grooves or ridges), manufacturing process (e.g., 
hot finished, cold-drawn, annealed), outer surface (e.g., plain or 
enhanced with grooves, ridges, fins, or gills), end finish (e.g., plain 
end, swaged end, flared end, expanded end, crimped end, threaded), 
coating (e.g., plastic, paint), insulation, attachments (e.g., plain, 
capped, plugged, with compression or other fitting), or physical 
configuration (e.g., straight, coiled, bent, wound on spools).
    The scope of the Orders covers, but is not limited to, seamless 
refined copper pipe and tube produced or comparable to the American 
Society for Testing and Materials (``ASTM'') ASTM-B42, ASTM-B68, ASTM-
B75, ASTM-B88, ASTM-B88M, ASTM-B188, ASTM-B251, ASTM-B251M, ASTM-B280, 
ASTM-B302, ASTM-B306, ASTM-359, ASTM-B743, ASTM-B819, and ASTM-B903 
specifications and meeting the physical parameters described therein. 
Also included within the scope of the Orders are all sets of covered 
products, including ``line sets'' of seamless refined copper tubes 
(with or without fittings or insulation) suitable for connecting an 
outdoor air conditioner or heat pump to an indoor evaporator unit. The 
phrase ``all sets of covered products'' denotes any combination of 
items put up for sale that is comprised of merchandise subject to the 
scope.
    ``Refined copper'' is defined as: (1) Metal containing at least 
99.85 percent by weight of copper; or (2) metal containing at least 
97.5 percent by weight of copper, provided that the content by weight 
of any other element does not exceed the following limits:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Limiting
                                                              Content
                         Element                            Percent by
                                                              Weight
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ag--Silver..............................................            0.25
As--Arsenic.............................................             0.5
Cd--Cadmium.............................................             1.3
Cr--Chromium............................................             1.4
Mg--Magnesium...........................................             0.8
Pb--Lead................................................             1.5
S--Sulfur...............................................             0.7
Sn--Tin.................................................             0.8
Te--Tellurium...........................................             0.8
Zn--Zinc................................................             1.0
Zr--Zirconium...........................................             0.3
Other elements (each)...................................             0.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Excluded from the scope of the Orders are all seamless circular 
hollows of refined copper less than 12 inches in length whose OD 
(actual) exceeds its length. The products subject to the Orders are 
currently classifiable under subheadings 7411.10.1030 and 7411.10.1090 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). 
Products subject to the Orders may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 
7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and 8415.90.8085. Although 
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the scope of the Orders is 
dispositive.

Continuation of the Orders

    As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC 
that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or 
recurrence of

[[Page 93665]]

dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, 
pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the 
Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD orders on copper 
pipe and tube from the PRC and Mexico. United States Customs and Border 
Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in 
effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise.
    The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the 
date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of 
continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department 
intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of the Orders not later 
than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of 
continuation.
    These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance 
with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).

    Dated: December 14, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-30653 Filed 12-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                    93664                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Notices

                                                    specifically related to the delivery of                 copper pipe and tube from the PRC and                      pipe and tube produced or comparable
                                                    services, which is consistent with                      Mexico.1 On October 1, 2015, the                           to the American Society for Testing and
                                                    federal accounting standards.                           Department initiated 2 and the ITC                         Materials (‘‘ASTM’’) ASTM–B42,
                                                                                                            instituted 3 five-year (sunset) reviews of                 ASTM–B68, ASTM–B75, ASTM–B88,
                                                    Conclusion
                                                                                                            the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of                  ASTM–B88M, ASTM–B188, ASTM–
                                                       Based on the information provided                    the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the                    B251, ASTM–B251M, ASTM–B280,
                                                    above, the US&FCS believes its                          ‘‘Act’’). As a result of its reviews, the                  ASTM–B302, ASTM–B306, ASTM–359,
                                                    proposed fees are consistent with both                  Department determined that revocation                      ASTM–B743, ASTM–B819, and ASTM–
                                                    the mission of US&FCS to promote                        of the Orders would likely lead to                         B903 specifications and meeting the
                                                    ‘‘exports of goods and services from the                continuation or recurrence of dumping.4                    physical parameters described therein.
                                                    United States, particularly by small                    The Department, therefore, notified the                    Also included within the scope of the
                                                    businesses and medium-sized                             ITC of the magnitude of the dumping                        Orders are all sets of covered products,
                                                    businesses,’’ and the objective of OMB                  margins likely to prevail should the                       including ‘‘line sets’’ of seamless refined
                                                    Circular A–25 to ‘‘promote efficient                    Orders be revoked.5 On December 8,                         copper tubes (with or without fittings or
                                                    allocation of the nation’s resources by                 2016, the ITC published its                                insulation) suitable for connecting an
                                                    establishing charges for special benefits               determination that revocation of the                       outdoor air conditioner or heat pump to
                                                    provided to the recipient that are at least             Orders would likely lead to                                an indoor evaporator unit. The phrase
                                                    as great as the cost to the U.S.                        continuation or recurrence of material                     ‘‘all sets of covered products’’ denotes
                                                    Government of providing the special                     injury to an industry in the United                        any combination of items put up for sale
                                                    benefits.’’                                             States within a reasonably foreseeable                     that is comprised of merchandise
                                                                                                            time, pursuant to section 751(c) of the                    subject to the scope.
                                                    Frank Spector,
                                                                                                            Act.6                                                         ‘‘Refined copper’’ is defined as: (1)
                                                    Senior Advisor, Office of Trade Promotion                                                                          Metal containing at least 99.85 percent
                                                    Programs.                                               Scope of the Orders
                                                                                                                                                                       by weight of copper; or (2) metal
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–30423 Filed 12–20–16; 8:45 am]               For the purpose of the Orders, the                      containing at least 97.5 percent by
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P                                  products covered are all seamless                          weight of copper, provided that the
                                                                                                            circular refined copper pipes and tubes,                   content by weight of any other element
                                                                                                            including redraw hollows, greater than                     does not exceed the following limits:
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  or equal to six inches (152.4 mm) in
                                                                                                            length and measuring less than 12.130                                                                  Limiting
                                                    International Trade Administration                                                                                                                             Content
                                                                                                            inches (308.102 mm) (actual) in outside                                  Element
                                                    [A–570–964; A–201–838]                                  diameter (‘‘OD’’), regardless of wall                                                                 Percent by
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Weight
                                                                                                            thickness, bore (e.g., smooth, enhanced
                                                    Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and                        with inner grooves or ridges),                             Ag—Silver .............................           0.25
                                                    Tube from the People’s Republic of                      manufacturing process (e.g., hot                           As—Arsenic ..........................              0.5
                                                    China and Mexico: Continuation of                       finished, cold-drawn, annealed), outer                     Cd—Cadmium ......................                  1.3
                                                    Antidumping Duty Orders                                 surface (e.g., plain or enhanced with                      Cr—Chromium ......................                 1.4
                                                                                                            grooves, ridges, fins, or gills), end finish               Mg—Magnesium ...................                   0.8
                                                    AGENCY:    Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                             Pb—Lead ..............................             1.5
                                                    International Trade Administration,                     (e.g., plain end, swaged end, flared end,
                                                                                                                                                                       S—Sulfur ..............................            0.7
                                                    Department of Commerce.                                 expanded end, crimped end, threaded),                      Sn—Tin .................................           0.8
                                                    SUMMARY: As a result of the                             coating (e.g., plastic, paint), insulation,                Te—Tellurium .......................               0.8
                                                    determinations by the Department of                     attachments (e.g., plain, capped,                          Zn—Zinc ...............................            1.0
                                                    Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) and the                   plugged, with compression or other                         Zr—Zirconium .......................               0.3
                                                                                                            fitting), or physical configuration (e.g.,                 Other elements (each) ..........                   0.3
                                                    International Trade Commission (the
                                                    ‘‘ITC’’) that revocation of the                         straight, coiled, bent, wound on spools).
                                                                                                               The scope of the Orders covers, but is                     Excluded from the scope of the Orders
                                                    antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) orders on
                                                                                                            not limited to, seamless refined copper                    are all seamless circular hollows of
                                                    seamless refined copper pipe and tube
                                                                                                                                                                       refined copper less than 12 inches in
                                                    (‘‘copper pipe and tube’’) from the                        1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube             length whose OD (actual) exceeds its
                                                    People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) and                from Mexico and the People’s Republic of China:            length. The products subject to the
                                                    Mexico would likely lead to a                           Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final                  Orders are currently classifiable under
                                                    continuation or recurrence of dumping                   Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
                                                                                                            from Mexico, 75 FR 71070 (November 22, 2010)               subheadings 7411.10.1030 and
                                                    and material injury to an industry in the
                                                                                                            (‘‘Orders’’).                                              7411.10.1090 of the Harmonized Tariff
                                                    United States, the Department is                           2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80   Schedule of the United States
                                                    publishing this notice of continuation of               FR 59133 (October 1, 2015).                                (‘‘HTSUS’’). Products subject to the
                                                    the AD orders.                                             3 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
                                                                                                                                                                       Orders may also enter under HTSUS
                                                    DATES: Effective December 21, 2016.                     from China and Mexico; Institution of Five-Year
                                                                                                            Reviews, 80 FR 59186 (October 1, 2015).                    subheadings 7407.10.1500,
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                           4 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube             7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and
                                                    Robert Galantucci, 202–482–2923, AD/                    from the People’s Republic of China and Mexico:            8415.90.8085. Although the HTSUS
                                                    CVD Operations, Enforcement and                         Preliminary Results of the Sunset Reviews of the           subheadings are provided for
                                                    Compliance, International Trade                         Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 4252 (January 26,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            2016) and accompanying Preliminary Decision
                                                                                                                                                                       convenience and customs purposes, the
                                                    Administration, U.S. Department of                      Memorandum; Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and               written description of the scope of the
                                                    Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution                  Tube from the People’s Republic of China and               Orders is dispositive.
                                                    Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.                       Mexico: Final Results of the Full Sunset Reviews of
                                                                                                            the Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 38134 (June             Continuation of the Orders
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                            13, 2016).
                                                                                                               5 Id.
                                                                                                                                                                         As a result of the determinations by
                                                    Background                                                                                                         the Department and the ITC that
                                                                                                               6 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
                                                      On November 22, 2010, the                             From China and Mexico; Determination, 81 FR                revocation of the Orders would likely
                                                    Department published the AD orders on                   88704 (December 8, 2016).                                  lead to continuation or recurrence of


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:38 Dec 20, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00010   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM        21DEN1


                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 21, 2016 / Notices                                                  93665

                                                    dumping and material injury to an                       the decision of the United States Court               additional information if necessary and
                                                    industry in the United States, pursuant                 of Appeals for the Federal Circuit                    to provide parties an opportunity to
                                                    to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19                  (CAFC) in Timken Co., v United States,                comment on any new additional
                                                    CFR 351.218(a), the Department hereby                   893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken),               information; and (3) explain our change
                                                    orders the continuation of the AD orders                as clarified by Diamond Sawblades                     in the calculation of our by-product
                                                    on copper pipe and tube from the PRC                    Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626                 methodology and to request additional
                                                    and Mexico. United States Customs and                   F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond                   information if necessary, and to provide
                                                    Border Protection will continue to                      Sawblades), the Department of                         parties an opportunity to comment on
                                                    collect AD cash deposits at the rates in                Commerce (the Department) is notifying                any new additional information.3
                                                    effect at the time of entry for all imports             the public that the final judgment in this               Upon consideration of the First
                                                    of subject merchandise.                                 case is not in harmony with the 2010–                 Remand Results,4 on August 20, 2015,
                                                       The effective date of the continuation               2011 AR Final Results,2 and that the                  the Court remanded the 2010–2011 AR
                                                    of the Orders will be the date of                       Department is amending the 2010–2011                  Final Results and First Remand Results
                                                    publication in the Federal Register of                  AR Final Results with respect to the                  to the Department as follows: (1) To
                                                    this notice of continuation. Pursuant to                weighted-average dumping margin                       either remove the labor items identified
                                                    section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the                       assigned to both Juangcheng Kangtai                   among the selling, general and
                                                    Department intends to initiate the next                 Chemical Co. Ltd. (Kangtai), and Hebei                administrative (SG&A) expenses of the
                                                    five-year reviews of the Orders not later               Jiheng Chemical Co., Ltd. (Jiheng).                   financial statements from MVC or
                                                    than 30 days prior to the fifth                         DATES: Effective December 3, 2016.                    explain why adhering to the
                                                    anniversary of the effective date of                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                                                                                  Department’s Labor Methodology policy
                                                    continuation.                                           Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office                is inappropriate in this instance; (2) to
                                                       These five-year sunset reviews and                   VII, Enforcement and Compliance,                      either supply valid reasons to support
                                                    this notice are in accordance with                      International Trade Administration,                   changing the byproduct methodology in
                                                    section 751(c) of the Act and published                 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401                     this proceeding which amounts to a
                                                    pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act                Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,                  ‘‘sufficient, reasoned analysis,’’
                                                    and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).                               DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0176.                   supported by substantial evidence, or to
                                                      Dated: December 14, 2016.
                                                                                                                                                                  revert to the ‘‘former’’ methodology,
                                                                                                            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                                                                                  with any appropriate modification (e.g.,
                                                    Paul Piquado,
                                                                                                            Background                                            capping) to avoid illogical conclusions
                                                    Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and                                                                      that do not match the real world
                                                    Compliance.                                                On January 22, 2013, the Department
                                                                                                            published the 2010–2011 AR Final                      experience of the respondents; (3) to
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–30653 Filed 12–20–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            Results. On July 24, 2014, the Court                  value urea using Philippine domestic
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                                                                        pricing data or explain why GTA import
                                                                                                            remanded the 2010–2011 AR Final
                                                                                                            Results to the Department regarding our               data is superior to the domestic pricing
                                                                                                            primary surrogate country selection as                data on the record; and (4) to select the
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                                                                        best SVs for hydrogen and chlorine that
                                                                                                            follows: (1) Provide a reasonable
                                                    International Trade Administration                      explanation why the range of the GNIs                 reflect a full consideration of the
                                                                                                            listed on the Surrogate Country                       interested parties’ comments and how
                                                    [A–570–898]                                                                                                   these inputs were valued in prior
                                                                                                            Memorandum qualify the countries as
                                                                                                            proximate and ‘‘economically                          administrative reviews.5 On November
                                                    Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the                                                                            23, 2016, the Court sustained the
                                                    People’s Republic of China: Notice of                   comparable’’ to the PRC, including a
                                                                                                            discussion of why the Department                      Department’s Final Second
                                                    Court Decision Not in Harmony With                                                                            Redetermination, and entered final
                                                    the Final Results and Amended Final                     believes India’s GNI does not, if that
                                                                                                            continues to be our determination,                    judgment.6
                                                    Results of the Antidumping Duty
                                                    Administrative Review; 2010–2011                        qualify it as an economically                         Timken Notice
                                                                                                            comparable country, and (2) place the
                                                    AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                             In its decision in Timken, as clarified
                                                                                                            data on the record that the Department
                                                    International Trade Administration,                                                                           by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held
                                                                                                            relied upon to make our determination.
                                                    Department of Commerce.                                                                                       that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
                                                                                                            The Court also accepted the
                                                                                                                                                                  Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
                                                    SUMMARY: On November 23, 2016, the                      Department’s request for a voluntary
                                                                                                                                                                  the Department must publish a notice of
                                                    United States Court of International                    remand of the final results with the
                                                                                                                                                                  a court decision that is not ‘‘in
                                                    Trade (the Court) sustained the final                   following instructions to: (1) Reconsider
                                                                                                                                                                  harmony’’ with a Department
                                                    second remand redetermination                           whether the ILO wage rate used to value
                                                                                                                                                                  determination and must suspend
                                                    pertaining to the administrative review                 the labor FOP includes labor,
                                                                                                                                                                  liquidation of entries pending a
                                                    of the antidumping duty order on                        retirement, and employee benefit
                                                                                                                                                                  ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
                                                    Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the                      expenses, and whether these expenses
                                                    People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the                are double counted if the Department                    3 See Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical
                                                    period of review of June 1, 2010,                       does not adjust the financial ratio to                Corp., et. al. v. United States, Slip Op. 14–88,
                                                    through May 31, 2011.1 Consistent with                  correctly reflect overlapping expenses in             Consolidated Court No. 13–00073 (CIT 2014) (First
                                                                                                            the financial statements; (2) explain the             Redetermination).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                    4 See Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical
                                                      1 See Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical
                                                                                                            Department’s change in methodology for
                                                    Corp., et al. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 13–                                                           Corp., et. al. v. United States, Final Results of
                                                                                                            calculating intra-company                             Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, December
                                                    00073, Slip Op. 16–110 (CIT 2016); see also
                                                    Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative           transportation costs by collecting                    11, 2014 (First Remand Results).
                                                                                                                                                                    5 See Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical
                                                    Review of Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the
                                                    People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Second       2 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the            Corp., et. al. v. United States, Slip Op. 15–91,
                                                    Redetermination Pursuant to Remand,’’ March 22,         People’s Republic of China: Final Results of          Consolidated Court No. 13–00073 (CIT 2015).
                                                    2016 (Final Second Redetermination), and available      Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–           6 See Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical

                                                    here: http://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/15–          2011, 78 FR 4386 (January 22, 2013) (2010–2011 AR     Corp., et. al. v. United States, Slip Op. 16–110,
                                                    91.pdf.                                                 Final Results).                                       Consolidated Court No. 13–00073 (CIT 2016).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:38 Dec 20, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00011   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM   21DEN1



Document Created: 2018-02-14 09:12:05
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 09:12:05
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective December 21, 2016.
ContactRobert Galantucci, 202-482-2923, AD/ CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
FR Citation81 FR 93664 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR