81 FR 96435 - Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 251 (December 30, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 251 (December 30, 2016)
| Page Range | 96435-96437 | |
| FR Document | 2016-31728 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 251 (Friday, December 30, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 96435-96437] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-31728] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-810] Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded ASTM A- 312 stainless steel pipe from Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2014, through November 30, 2015. The review covers two exporters and/or producers of the subject merchandise: SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH) and LS Metal Co., Ltd. (LS Metal). The Department preliminarily determines that during the POR SeAH made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value and LS Metal had no shipments. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective December 30, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2316. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 9, 2016, the Department published a notice of initiation of this review.\1\ On January 27, 2016, the Department exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines by four [[Page 96436]] business days.\2\ On May 3, 2016 and December 13, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results to December 20, 2016.\3\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 6832 (February 9, 2016). \2\ See the Department's January 27, 2016 memorandum, ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure during Snowstorm `Jonas.' '' \3\ See the Department's August 15, 2016 memorandum, ``Certain Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;'' see also, the Department's December 13, 2016 memorandum, ``Certain Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.'' \4\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; 2014-2015,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are shipments of welded austenitic stainless steel pipe (WSSP) from Korea that meets the standards and specifications set forth by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) for the welded form of chromium-nickel pipe designated ASTM A-312. Imports of these products are currently classifiable under the following United States Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) subheadings: 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5015, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5065, and 7306.40.5085.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For a full description of the scope of the Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments LS Metal, in its questionnaire response, claimed that it made no sales or shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We issued a no shipments inquiry to, and received no contradictory information from, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). As there is no record information contrary to LS Metal's claim, we preliminarily determine that LS Metal had no shipments of the subject merchandise and, therefore, no reviewable transactions during the POR. The Department intends to complete the review with respect to LS Metal and will issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review. See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum for further discussion of this issue. Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export prices or export prices are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the Department's main building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the weighted-average dumping margin for the POR is as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Producer and/or exporter (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SeAH Steel Corporation..................................... 1.91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rate Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\6\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review where applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on May 6, 2003.\7\ This clarification applies to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by a respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review except if that rate is de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the [[Page 96437]] rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the ``all-others'' rate of 7.00 percent established in the Amended Final Determination and Order.\8\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, 60 FR 10064 (February 23, 1995) (Amended Final Determination and Order). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days after the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the publication date of this notice.\9\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\10\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\11\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.\12\ All briefs must be filed electronically via ACCESS.\13\ An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the on which it is due.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \12\ Id. \13\ See 19 CFR 351.303. \14\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the publication date of this notice, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\15\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue the final results of this review within 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless otherwise extended.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results of this review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: December 20, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. No Shipments V. Discussion of Methodology A. Comparisons to Normal Value B. Date of Sale C. Product Comparisons D. Constructed Export Price E. Normal Value F. Cost of Production Analysis G. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices H. Currency Conversion VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-31728 Filed 12-29-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2016 / Notices 96435
On March 1, 1999, the Department received a submission from the Ministry response to appropriately filed requests
initiated sunset reviews on these orders of Economic Development and Trade of for review.
and later published its notice of Ukraine regarding its position on this We are issuing and publishing the
continuation of the antidumping duty matter.10 final determination in these five-year
orders for certain countries.3 On (sunset) reviews and notice in
Scope of the Orders
October 1, 2004, the Department accordance with sections 751(c) and
initiated the second sunset reviews of The merchandise subject to the orders 777(i)(1) of the Act.
these orders and later published its is solid urea, a high-nitrogen content
Dated: December 23, 2016.
notice of continuation of the fertilizer which is produced by reacting
ammonia with carbon dioxide. The Paul Piquado,
antidumping duty orders on solid urea
product is currently classified under the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
from the Russian Federation and
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Compliance.
Ukraine.4 On December 1, 2010, the
United States (HTSUS) item number [FR Doc. 2016–31719 Filed 12–29–16; 8:45 am]
Department initiated the third sunset
reviews of these orders and later 3102.10.00.00. Previously such BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
published its notice of continuation of merchandise was classified under item
the antidumping duty orders.5 On number 480.3000 of the Tariff
November 1, 2016, the Department Schedules of the United States. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
initiated the fourth sunset reviews of Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs International Trade Administration
these orders.6
We did not receive a notice of intent purposes, the written description of the [A–580–810]
to participate from domestic interested merchandise subject to the orders is
parties in these fourth sunset reviews by dispositive. Welded ASTM A–312 Stainless Steel
the deadline date.7 As a result, the Pipe From the Republic of Korea:
Determination To Revoke Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Department determined that no
domestic interested party intends to Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
participate in the sunset reviews,8 and Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 2015
on November 21, 2016, we notified the and 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), if no
domestic interested party files a notice AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Commission, in International Trade Administration,
writing, that we intended to issue a final of intent to participate, the Department
shall, within 90 days after the initiation Department of Commerce.
determination revoking these
of the review, issue a final SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
antidumping duty orders.9 On
December 1, 2016, the Department determination revoking the order. (Department) is conducting an
Because the domestic interested parties administrative review of the
Duty Order on Solid Urea from the Union of Soviet did not file a notice of intent to antidumping duty order on welded
Socialist Republics to the Commonwealth of participate in these sunset reviews, the ASTM A–312 stainless steel pipe from
Independent States and the Baltic States and Department finds that no domestic Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of
Opportunity to Comment, 57 FR 28828 (June 29, review (POR) is December 1, 2014,
1992).
interested party is participating in these
3 See Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders: sunset reviews. Therefore, consistent through November 30, 2015. The review
Solid Urea from Belarus, Estonia, Lithuania, with 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i) we are covers two exporters and/or producers
Romania, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, revoking these antidumping duty orders of the subject merchandise: SeAH Steel
Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, 64 FR 62653 (November effective December 20, 2016, the fifth Corporation (SeAH) and LS Metal Co.,
17, 1999); see also Antidumping Duty Order; Urea
from the Socialist Republic of Romania, 52 FR 2636 anniversary of the date the Department Ltd. (LS Metal). The Department
(July 14, 1987) and Final Results of Expedited published its most recent notice of preliminarily determines that during the
Sunset Review: Solid Urea from Romania, 64 FR continuation of the antidumping duty POR SeAH made sales of subject
48360 (September 3, 1999) (Because Romania was orders. merchandise at less than normal value
not part of the USSR, the initial investigation and
the first five-year review on urea from Romania and LS Metal had no shipments. We
Effective Date of Revocation
were conducted separately, but the continuation invite interested parties to comment on
order combined the remaining former Soviet Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the these preliminary results.
Socialist Republics and Romania together.); Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the
Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order: Solid Urea DATES: Effective December 30, 2016.
from Armenia, 64 FR 62654 (November 17, 1999);
Department will instruct U.S. Customs
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
March 1999 Sunset Reviews: Final Results and and Border Protection to terminate the
Revocations, 64 FR 24137 (May 5, 1999) (revoking suspension of liquidation of the Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations,
the antidumping duty orders on solid urea from merchandise subject to these orders Office VII, Enforcement and
Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Compliance, International Trade
Moldova); and March and April 1999 Sunset Administration, U.S. Department of
Reviews: Final Results and Revocations, 64 FR on or after December 20, 2016. Entries
28974 (May 28, 1999) (revoking the antidumping of subject merchandise prior to the Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
duty order on solid urea from Latvia). effective date of revocation will NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
4 See Notice of Continuation of Antidumping
continue to be subject to suspension of (202) 482–2316.
Duty Orders: Solid Urea from the Russian SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federation and Ukraine, 71 FR 581 (January 5, liquidation and antidumping duty
2006); see also Solid Urea from Belarus, Estonia, deposit requirements. The Department Background
Lithuania, Romania, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and will complete any pending
Uzbekistan: Final Results and Revocation of Orders, administrative reviews of these orders On February 9, 2016, the Department
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
69 FR 77993 (December 29, 2004). published a notice of initiation of this
5 Solid Urea from the Russian Federation and and will conduct administrative reviews
Ukraine: Continuation of Antidumping Duty of subject merchandise entered prior to review.1 On January 27, 2016, the
Orders, 76 FR 78885 (December 20, 2011). the effective date of revocation in Department exercised its discretion to
6 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, toll all administrative deadlines by four
81 FR 75808 (November 1, 2016). 10 See Letter from Ministry of Economic
7 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
Development and Trade of Ukraine, ‘‘Solid Urea 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
8 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A).
from Ukraine, 4th Sunset Review: A–823–801,’’ Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
9 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2). dated December 1, 2016. 6832 (February 9, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:18 Dec 29, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_96686/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2016 / Notices 96437
rate established for the most recently Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
completed segment of this proceeding Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at
for the manufacturer of the a date and time to be determined.15 National Oceanic and Atmospheric
merchandise; and (4) if neither the Parties should confirm by telephone the Administration
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm date, time, and location of the hearing RIN 0648–XF068
covered in this or any previously two days before the scheduled date.
completed segment of this proceeding, Fisheries Off West Coast States;
We intend to issue the final results of
then the cash deposit rate will be the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
‘‘all-others’’ rate of 7.00 percent this review within 120 days after the
Application for an Exempted Fishing
established in the Amended Final date of publication of this notice, unless
Permit (EFP)
Determination and Order.8 These otherwise extended.16
deposit requirements, when imposed, AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Notification to Importers Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
shall remain in effect until further
notice. This notice serves as a preliminary Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
reminder to importers of their Commerce.
Disclosure and Public Comment ACTION: Notice; receipt of EFP
responsibility under 19 CFR
The Department intends to disclose 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate application; request for comments.
the calculations performed in regarding the reimbursement of SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt
connection with these preliminary antidumping duties prior to liquidation of an exempted fishing permit (EFP)
results within five days after the date of of the relevant entries during this application from the West Coast Seafood
publication of this notice in accordance review period. Failure to comply with Processors Association, Environmental
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). this requirement could result in the Defense Fund, Oregon Trawl
Interested parties may submit case Department’s presumption that Commission, and Pacific Seafoods for
briefs no later than 30 days after the reimbursement of antidumping duties an EFP Program to monitor and
publication date of this notice.9 Rebuttal minimize salmon bycatch when vessels
occurred and the subsequent assessment
briefs, limited to issues raised in the target rockfish in the shorebased
of doubled antidumping duties.
case briefs, may be filed not later than individual fishing quota (IFQ) fishery.
five days after the date for filing case Notification to Interested Parties The NMFS West Coast Region’s
briefs.10 Parties who submit case briefs Assistant Regional Administrator for
or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit These preliminary results of this
Sustainable Fisheries has made a
with each argument: (1) A statement of review are issued and published in
preliminary determination that the
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
subject EFP application contains all the
argument; and (3) a table of 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR required information and the EFP
authorities.11 Executive summaries 351.213(h). Program warrants further consideration.
should be limited to five pages total, Dated: December 20, 2016. Therefore, NMFS announces that the
including footnotes.12 All briefs must be Assistant Regional Administrator for
Paul Piquado,
filed electronically via ACCESS.13 An Sustainable Fisheries proposes to
electronically filed document must be Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance. recommend that EFPs be issued under
received successfully in its entirety by an EFP Program that would allow as
ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in many as 50 commercial fishing vessels
the on which it is due.14 the Preliminary Decision to conduct fishing operations that are
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), Memorandum: otherwise restricted by the regulations
interested parties who wish to request a governing the fisheries of the west coast
hearing must submit a written request to I. Summary
II. Background
of the United States. If awarded, the EFP
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Program would exempt participating
and Compliance within 30 days of the III. Scope of the Order
IV. No Shipments limited entry bottom trawl vessels from
publication date of this notice, filed the requirement to use selective flatfish
electronically via ACCESS. Requests V. Discussion of Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value trawl gear shoreward of the Trawl
should contain: (1) The party’s name, Rockfish Conservation Area (RCA) north
address and telephone number; (2) the B. Date of Sale
C. Product Comparisons of 40°10′ N. latitude in waters off the
number of participants; and (3) a list of west coast. In addition, if awarded, the
issues parties intend to discuss. Issues D. Constructed Export Price
E. Normal Value EFP Program would also allow
raised in the hearing will be limited to participating bottom trawl vessels that
those raised in the respective case and F. Cost of Production Analysis
G. Calculation of Normal Value Based on fish any place along the west coast an
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing exemption to the minimum mesh size
Comparison Market Prices
is made, the Department intends to hold requirement of 4.5 inches.
H. Currency Conversion
the hearing at the U.S. Department of The EFP Program is intended to
VI. Recommendation
8 See Notice of Amended Final Determination and [FR Doc. 2016–31728 Filed 12–29–16; 8:45 am]
provide additional flexibility in the
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Welded Stainless
configuration and use of bottom trawl
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, 60 FR 10064 gear for the vessels, as well as provide
additional information on potential
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(February 23, 1995) (Amended Final Determination
and Order). impacts to protected resources,
9 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
particularly Chinook salmon bycatch,
requirements).
10 See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d). resulting from this added flexibility.
11 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). The additional information would be
12 Id. 15 See19 CFR 351.310(d). used to enhance the management of the
13 See 19 CFR 351.303. 16 Seesection 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR groundfish fishery and promote the
14 See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). 351.213(h)(1). objectives of the Pacific Coast
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:18 Dec 29, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_96686/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-30 05:16:32
Document Modified: 2016-12-30 05:16:32
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective December 30, 2016. | |
| Contact | Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2316. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 96435 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR