82_FR_10359 82 FR 10332 - Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Correction to the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Rescission of Review, in Part

82 FR 10332 - Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Correction to the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Rescission of Review, in Part

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 27 (February 10, 2017)

Page Range10332-10333
FR Document2017-02789

The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is amending the final results of the third administrative review of the antidumping duty (``AD'') order on Multilayered Wood Flooring (``MLWF'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') to correct a ministerial error. The Department has reviewed Linyi Anying's allegation and determined that there was an error in the review of Linyi Anying's No Shipment Certification.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 27 (Friday, February 10, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 27 (Friday, February 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10332-10333]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02789]



[[Page 10332]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-970]


Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: 
Correction to the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, Rescission of Review, in Part

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is amending the 
final results of the third administrative review of the antidumping 
duty (``AD'') order on Multilayered Wood Flooring (``MLWF'') from the 
People's Republic of China (``PRC'') to correct a ministerial error. 
The Department has reviewed Linyi Anying's allegation and determined 
that there was an error in the review of Linyi Anying's No Shipment 
Certification.

DATES: Effective Date: July 19, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  William Horn, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2615.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 19, 2016, the Department published the final results of the 
third administrative review of the AD order on MLWF from the PRC.\1\ On 
August 11, 2016, the Department published a correction to the Final 
Results to include a list of PRC-wide entity companies omitted from the 
Final Results.\2\ Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd. (``Anying'') was included 
within the PRC-wide entity. The period of review (``POR'') is December 
1, 2013, through November 30, 2014. On August 12, 2016, the Department 
received a ministerial error allegation on behalf of Anying.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
2013-2014, 81 FR 46899 (July 19, 2016).
    \2\ Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Correction to the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 81 FR 53120 (August 11, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order includes MLWF, subject to 
certain exceptions.\3\ Imports of the subject merchandise are provided 
for under the following subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (``HTSUS''): 4412.31.0520; 4412.31.0540; 
4412.31.0560; 4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 4412.31.3175; 4412.31.4040; 
4412.31.4050; 4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 4412.31.4075; 4412.31.4080; 
4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135; 4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.5175; 
4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; 4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; 4412.32.0560; 
4412.32.0565; 4412.32.0570; 4412.32.2510; 4412.32.2520; 4412.32.2525; 
4412.32.2530; 4412.32.3125; 4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 4412.32.3165; 
4412.32.3175; 4412.32.3185; 4412.32.5600; 4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 
4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; 4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 4412.39.4032; 
4412.39.4039; 4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 
4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; 4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 4412.39.5050; 
4412.94.1030; 4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 
4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141; 4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 4412.94.4100; 
4412.94.5100; 4412.94.6000; 4412.94.7000; 4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 
4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600; 4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 4412.99.1040; 
4412.99.3110; 4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 
4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; 4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 4412.99.5105; 
4412.99.5115; 4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; 4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 
4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; 4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; 4418.72.2000; 
4418.72.9500; and 9801.00.2500. While HTSUS subheadings are provided 
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 
subject merchandise is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to 
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, regarding ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final 
Results of the 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China,'' 
(``Final Results IDM''), dated July 12, 2016 for a complete 
description of the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ministerial Error

    The Department will, if appropriate, correct any ministerial errors 
by amending the final results of review. Section 751(h) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a 
``ministerial error'' as an error ``in addition, subtraction, or other 
arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, 
duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional 
error which the Secretary considers ministerial.''
    On August 12, 2016, Anying submitted a ministerial error 
allegation. On August 18, 2016, Anying filed a complaint with the U.S. 
Court of International Trade (``CIT'') contesting the application of 
the PRC-entity rate on the same grounds as the ministerial error 
allegation.\4\ On November 10, 2016, the CIT granted the Department 
leave to consider the ministerial error allegation filed by Anying and, 
if necessary, to publish amended final results.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd and Lumber Liquidators 
Services, LLC vs. United States, Court No. 16-00159 (ECF Dkt. No. 
6).
    \5\ See id. (ECF Dkt. No. 25, dated November 10, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Anying alleges that, although the it submitted a ``no shipments'' 
certificate in the third administrative review, the Department failed 
to rescind the administrative review for Anying. As a result, it was 
incorrectly included within the PRC-entity and subject to the PRC-wide 
rate. We have determined that we made a ministerial error and we have 
determined that Anying had no shipments during the POR.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a full discussion see Memorandum from Gary Taverman, 
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance re: Third 
Antidumping Administrative Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from 
the People's Republic of China: Ministerial Error Memorandum 
(``Ministerial Error Memo'') dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    Because the Department has determined that Anying had no shipments 
during the POR, we hereby rescind the review with respect to Anying. As 
a result, Anying will maintain its cash deposit rate from the most 
recently completed review in which it participated. This correction to 
the final results of administrative review is issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(2)(i) of the Act.

Instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), the Department determines, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise, 
where applicable, in

[[Page 10333]]

accordance with the amended final results of this review. If the 
Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of 
subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that 
exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\7\ The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the date of publication of these amended final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirement will be effective July 19, 
2016, for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after that date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. For Anying, which had 
no reviewable transactions during the POR, the cash deposit rate will 
remain unchanged from the rate assigned in the most recently completed 
review of the company.

Notifications to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 35 1.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This correction to the final results of administrative review is 
issued and published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 
777(i)(2)(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e) of the Department's 
regulations.

    Dated: February 6, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-02789 Filed 2-9-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

10332 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 27 / Friday, February 10, 2017 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE merchandise are provided for under the as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR following subheadings of the 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as International Trade Administration Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or [A–570–970] United States (‘‘HTSUS’’): 4412.31.0520; other arithmetic function, clerical error 4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; resulting from inaccurate copying, Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; duplication, or the like, and any other People’s Republic of China: Correction 4412.31.3175; 4412.31.4040; similar type of unintentional error to the Final Results of Antidumping 4412.31.4050; 4412.31.4060; which the Secretary considers Duty Administrative Review, 4412.31.4070; 4412.31.4075; ministerial.’’ Rescission of Review, in Part 4412.31.4080; 4412.31.5125; On August 12, 2016, Anying 4412.31.5135; 4412.31.5155; submitted a ministerial error allegation. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.5175; On August 18, 2016, Anying filed a International Trade Administration, 4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; complaint with the U.S. Court of Department of Commerce. 4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; International Trade (‘‘CIT’’) contesting SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 4412.32.0560; 4412.32.0565; the application of the PRC-entity rate on (‘‘Department’’) is amending the final 4412.32.0570; 4412.32.2510; the same grounds as the ministerial results of the third administrative 4412.32.2520; 4412.32.2525; error allegation.4 On November 10, review of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) 4412.32.2530; 4412.32.3125; 2016, the CIT granted the Department order on Multilayered Wood Flooring 4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; leave to consider the ministerial error (‘‘MLWF’’) from the People’s Republic 4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; allegation filed by Anying and, if of China (‘‘PRC’’) to correct a ministerial 4412.32.3185; 4412.32.5600; necessary, to publish amended final error. The Department has reviewed 4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; results.5 Linyi Anying’s allegation and 4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; Anying alleges that, although the it determined that there was an error in 4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; submitted a ‘‘no shipments’’ certificate the review of Linyi Anying’s No 4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; in the third administrative review, the Shipment Certification. 4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; Department failed to rescind the DATES: Effective Date: July 19, 2016. 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; administrative review for Anying. As a 4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; result, it was incorrectly included FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; within the PRC-entity and subject to the William Horn, AD/CVD Operations, PRC-wide rate. We have determined that Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; we made a ministerial error and we International Trade Administration, have determined that Anying had no Department of Commerce, 1401 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141; shipments during the POR.6 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2615. 4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; Amended Final Results 4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because the Department has 4412.94.6000; 4412.94.7000; determined that Anying had no Background 4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; shipments during the POR, we hereby On July 19, 2016, the Department 4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600; rescind the review with respect to published the final results of the third 4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; Anying. As a result, Anying will administrative review of the AD order 4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; maintain its cash deposit rate from the on MLWF from the PRC.1 On August 11, 4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; most recently completed review in 2016, the Department published a 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; which it participated. This correction to correction to the Final Results to 4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; the final results of administrative review include a list of PRC-wide entity 4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; is issued and published in accordance companies omitted from the Final 4412.99.5105; 4412.99.5115; with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(2)(i) of Results.2 Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd. 4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; the Act. (‘‘Anying’’) was included within the 4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; Instructions to U.S. Customs and PRC-wide entity. The period of review 4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; Border Protection (‘‘POR’’) is December 1, 2013, through November 30, 2014. On August 12, 4418.72.2000; 4418.72.9500; and Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 2016, the Department received a 9801.00.2500. While HTSUS Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the ministerial error allegation on behalf of subheadings are provided for Department determines, and CBP shall Anying. convenience and customs purposes, the assess, antidumping duties on all written description of the subject appropriate entries of subject Scope of the Order merchandise is dispositive. merchandise, where applicable, in The merchandise covered by the order Ministerial Error 4 See Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd and Lumber includes MLWF, subject to certain The Department will, if appropriate, Liquidators Services, LLC vs. United States, Court exceptions.3 Imports of the subject No. 16–00159 (ECF Dkt. No. 6). correct any ministerial errors by 5 See id. (ECF Dkt. No. 25, dated November 10, 1 Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s amending the final results of review. 2016). Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 6 For a full discussion see Memorandum from mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Duty Administrative Review, 2013–2014, 81 FR Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant 46899 (July 19, 2016). Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 2 Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ‘‘Issues Operations to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Republic of China: Correction to the Final Results and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 81 the 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Compliance re: Third Antidumping Administrative FR 53120 (August 11, 2016). Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 3 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy People’s Republic of China,’’ (‘‘Final Results IDM’’), People’s Republic of China: Ministerial Error Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and dated July 12, 2016 for a complete description of Memorandum (‘‘Ministerial Error Memo’’) dated Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. the Scope of the Order. concurrently with this notice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Feb 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 27 / Friday, February 10, 2017 / Notices 10333 accordance with the amended final CFR 351.224(e) of the Department’s surrogate value (SV) used to value the results of this review. If the Department regulations. mandatory respondents’ 3 anthracite determines that an exporter under Dated: February 6, 2017. coal. Carbon Activated challenged review had no shipments of subject Ronald K. Lorentzen, several aspects of the Department’s final merchandise, any suspended entries results as they pertained to Shanxi DMD Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement that entered under that exporter’s case Corporation (Shanxi DMD), which and Compliance. number will be liquidated at the PRC- supplied Carbon Activated’s imports of [FR Doc. 2017–02789 Filed 2–9–17; 8:45 am] wide rate.7 The Department intends to subject merchandise and was found to BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 be part of the PRC-wide entity in AR6 days after the date of publication of Final Results. On January 20, 2016, the these amended final results of review. Court in Calgon I remanded the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Cash Deposit Requirements Department’s AR6 Final Results and International Trade Administration instructed the Department to reconsider The following cash deposit its selection of the anthracite coal SV, requirement will be effective July 19, [A–570–904] and directed the Department to ‘‘assign 2016, for all shipments of the subject Shanxi DMD the all-others rate.’’ 4 merchandise entered, or withdrawn Certain Activated Carbon From the On May 25, 2016, the Department from warehouse, for consumption on or People’s Republic of China: Notice of filed Remand I with the Court.5 Based after that date, as provided for by Court Decision Not in Harmony With on Calgon I, which had ordered the section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. For Final Results of Administrative Review Department to ‘‘reconsider its selection Anying, which had no reviewable and Notice of Amended Final Results of an SV for anthracite coal’’ in AR6 transactions during the POR, the cash AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Final Results, and based on the deposit rate will remain unchanged International Trade Administration, Department’s finding that there were from the rate assigned in the most Department of Commerce. multiple SVs of equal reliability for recently completed review of the anthracite coal on the record, the SUMMARY: The Court of International company. Department determined to select the Trade (CIT or Court) sustained the Notifications to Importers Department of Commerce’s (the anthracite coal SV based on which This notice also serves as a final Department’s) second remand results secondary surrogate country was the reminder to importers of their pertaining to the sixth administrative most significant producer of comparable responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) review of the antidumping duty order merchandise.6 As a result of relying on to file a certificate regarding the on certain activated carbon from the significant production of comparable reimbursement of antidumping duties People’s Republic of China (PRC) merchandise in Remand I, the prior to liquidation of the relevant covering the period of April 1, 2012, Department valued anthracite coal using entries during this review period. through March 31, 2013. The contemporaneous SV data from Failure to comply with this requirement Department is notifying the public that Thailand.7 Accordingly, the margins for could result in the Secretary’s the final judgment in this case is not in Cherishmet and Jacobi (the mandatory presumption that reimbursement of harmony with the final results of the respondents) were revised to $0.52/ antidumping duties occurred and the administrative review, and that the kilogram (kg) and to $0.51/kg, subsequent assessment of double Department is amending the final respectively.8 antidumping duties. results. Additionally, we recalculated the margin for those separate rate Administrative Protective Order DATES: Effective Date: February 6, 2017. companies whose entries were subject FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: This notice also serves as a reminder to this litigation using the same method Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations we used in AR6 Final Results.9 Thus, to parties subject to administrative Office VIII, Enforcement and we calculated a weighted-average protective orders (APO) of their Compliance, International Trade margin of $0.51/kg based on the responsibility concerning the return or Administration, U.S. Department of publicly ranged U.S. sales quantities of destruction of proprietary information Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue the mandatory respondents.10 The disclosed under APO in accordance NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: with 19 CFR 35 1.305(a)(3), which (202) 482–9068. 3 The mandatory respondents are Jacobi Carbons continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AB (Jacobi) and Ningxia Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (Cherishmet). of the proceeding. Timely written Background 4 See Calgon Carbon Corp. v. United States, 145 notification of the return/destruction of F. Supp. 3d 1312, 1322–23, 1326–29 (CIT 2016) On November 25, 2014, the APO materials, or conversion to judicial (Calgon I). Department issued AR6 Final Results.1 5 See Calgon Carbon Corp. et al. v. United States, protective order, is hereby requested. The petitioners 2 and Carbon Activated Consol. Court No. 14–00326, Slip Op. 16–4, Final Failure to comply with the regulations Corporation (Carbon Activated), a U.S. Results Of Redetermination Pursuant To Court and the terms of an APO is a Remand, dated May 25, 2016, (Remand I). importer of subject merchandise, sanctionable violation. 6 See Remand I at 15–17, 31–36. challenged certain aspects of AR6 Final 7 Id. at 15–17, 31–35. Notification to Interested Parties Results. The petitioners challenged the 8 Id. at 49. This correction to the final results of Department’s final results regarding the 9 Id. at 50–51. Specifically, in AR6 Final Results, mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES administrative review is issued and we calculated the separate rate by using the ranged 1 Certain Activated Carbon from the People’s total sales quantities reported by the mandatory published in accordance with sections Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping respondents from the public versions of their 751(h) and 777(i)(2)(i) of the Act, and 19 Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR submissions to calculate a weighted-average margin 70163 (November 25, 2014) (AR6 Final Results) and because we found that methodology is more 7 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- accompanying Issues and Decisions Memorandum appropriate than calculating a simple average of the Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: (IDM). mandatory respondents’ margins. See AR6 Final Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 2 Calgon Carbon Corporation and Cabot Norit Results, 79 FR at 70164. (October 24, 2011). Americas (collectively, the petitioners). 10 See Remand I at 50–51. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Feb 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1


Document Created: 2017-02-11 18:15:06
Document Modified: 2017-02-11 18:15:06
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective Date: July 19, 2016.
ContactWilliam Horn, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2615.
FR Citation82 FR 10332 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR