82 FR 10743 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 30 (February 15, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 30 (February 15, 2017)
| Page Range | 10743-10744 | |
| FR Document | 2017-03046 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 15, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 10743-10744] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-03046] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 11, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') published the preliminary results of the eleventh administrative review (``AR'') of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (``WBF'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The period of review (``POR'') is January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. The AR covers 18 PRC exporters of subject merchandise, of which the Department selected one company for individual examination, Nantong Wangzhuang Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Nantong Wangzhuang''). For these final results, we continue to find that WBF has been sold in the United States at less than normal value and that certain companies subject to this administrative review had no shipments during the POR. DATES: Effective February 15, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 11, 2016, the Department published, and invited interested parties to comment on, the Preliminary Results.\1\ We received comments from the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. (collectively ``Petitioners''). No other party commented. We received no requests for a hearing. After consideration of Petitioners' comments, our final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results. For a complete description of the events that followed the publication of the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum \2\ which is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2015, 81 FR 70092 (October 11, 2016) (``Preliminary Results''). \2\ See the Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Eleventh Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, subject to certain exceptions.\3\ Imports of subject merchandise are classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings: 7009.92.1000, 7009.92.5000, 9403.20.0018, 9403.50.9041, 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080, 9403.60.8081, and 9403.90.8041. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (``Order''). \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of the Comments Received Final Results of Review As noted above, only Petitioners submitted comments on the Preliminary Results. The issues raised in Petitioners' case brief are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit of the main Department building, Room B8024. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Separate Rates In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that seven companies under review, including Nantong Wangzhuang, the sole mandatory respondent, did not establish their eligibility for separate rate status and would be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity.\5\ No parties argued against our preliminary separate rates determination.\6\ In these final results of review, we continue to determine that these seven companies should be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity, because they have not established their separate rate eligibility. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity, we are not conducting a review of the PRC-wide entity.\7\ Thus, there is no change to the rate for the PRC-wide entity from the Preliminary Results. The existing rate for the PRC-wide entity is 216.01 percent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Results. The six companies that did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate, besides Nantong Wangzhuang, are: (1) Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Clearwise Co., Ltd.; (3) Passwell Corporation; Pleasant Wave Ltd.; (4) Shanghai JianPu Export & Import Co., Ltd.; (5) Decca Furniture Ltd.; and (6) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd. (Exporter), Haining Changbei Furniture Co., Ltd. (Producer). \6\ See Memorandum from Edward Yang, Senior Director, Office VII for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China,'' dated October 3, 2016 (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''). \7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we determined that 11 companies subject to this AR had no shipments of subject merchandise and, therefore no reviewable transactions, during the POR.\8\ We received no comments [[Page 10744]] concerning our finding of no shipments by these 11 companies. In these final results of review, we continue to determine that these 11 companies had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. For a full discussion of this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ The 11 companies or company groupings with no shipments during the POR are: (1) Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmount Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (3) Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.; (4) Jiangsu Tairui Structure Engineering Co., Ltd.; (5) Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial Ltd. (H.K. Ltd.); (6) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (9) Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; (10) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these final results of review. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate POR entries of subject merchandise from the seven companies, including Nantong Wangzhuang, which failed to establish their eligibility for separate rate status at the rate applicable to the PRC-wide entity. For the 11 companies which the Department determined had no shipments during the POR, if there are any suspended entries under any of those companies' antidumping case numbers, they will be liquidated at the assessment rate for the PRC- wide entity.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date in the Federal Register of the final results of review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, including Nantong Wangzhuang and the six companies noted above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter; (4) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this or any previous review or in the original less-than- fair-value (LTFV) investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash- deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation, which is subject to sanction. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: February 8, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issue Comment: The Department Should Make Determinations Necessary to Address Circumvention and Evasion of the Antidumping Order Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-03046 Filed 2-14-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 15, 2017 / Notices 10743
For further information, contact the American Furniture Manufacturers Records Unit of the main Department
Christopher Kemp at Committee for Legal Trade and building, Room B8024. In addition, a
Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov or (202) Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, complete version of the Issues and
482–0862. Inc. (collectively ‘‘Petitioners’’). No Decision Memorandum can be accessed
Dated: February 9, 2017. other party commented. We received no directly on the internet at http://
requests for a hearing. After enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Andrew McGilvray,
consideration of Petitioners’ comments, and electronic versions of the Issues and
Executive Secretary.
our final results remain unchanged from Decision Memorandum are identical in
[FR Doc. 2017–03074 Filed 2–14–17; 8:45 am] the Preliminary Results. For a complete content.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P description of the events that followed
Separate Rates
the publication of the Preliminary
Results, see the Issues and Decision In the Preliminary Results, the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Memorandum 2 which is dated Department determined that seven
concurrently with, and hereby adopted companies under review, including
International Trade Administration Nantong Wangzhuang, the sole
by, this notice.
[A–570–890] mandatory respondent, did not establish
Scope of the Order their eligibility for separate rate status
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the The product covered by the order is and would be treated as part of the PRC-
People’s Republic of China: Final wooden bedroom furniture, subject to wide entity.5 No parties argued against
Results Antidumping Duty certain exceptions.3 Imports of subject our preliminary separate rates
Administrative Review and Final merchandise are classified under the determination.6 In these final results of
Determination of No Shipments in Part; Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the review, we continue to determine that
2015 United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: these seven companies should be
7009.92.1000, 7009.92.5000, treated as part of the PRC-wide entity,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
9403.20.0018, 9403.50.9041, because they have not established their
International Trade Administration, 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, separate rate eligibility. Because no
Department of Commerce. 9403.50.9080, 9403.60.8081, and party requested a review of the PRC-
SUMMARY: On October 11, 2016, the 9403.90.8041. Although the HTSUS wide entity, we are not conducting a
Department of Commerce (the subheadings are provided for review of the PRC-wide entity.7 Thus,
‘‘Department’’) published the convenience and customs purposes, the there is no change to the rate for the
preliminary results of the eleventh written product description in the Order PRC-wide entity from the Preliminary
administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of the remains dispositive.4 Results. The existing rate for the PRC-
antidumping duty order on wooden wide entity is 216.01 percent.
bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the Analysis of the Comments Received
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). Final Results of Review Final Determination of No Shipments
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is January In the Preliminary Results, we
As noted above, only Petitioners
1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. determined that 11 companies subject to
submitted comments on the Preliminary
The AR covers 18 PRC exporters of this AR had no shipments of subject
Results. The issues raised in Petitioners’
subject merchandise, of which the merchandise and, therefore no
case brief are addressed in the Issues
Department selected one company for reviewable transactions, during the
and Decision Memorandum. A list of
individual examination, Nantong the issues addressed in the Issues and POR.8 We received no comments
Wangzhuang Furniture Co., Ltd. Decision Memorandum is appended to
(‘‘Nantong Wangzhuang’’). For these this notice. The Issues and Decision
5 See Preliminary Results. The six companies that
final results, we continue to find that did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate,
Memorandum is a public document and besides Nantong Wangzhuang, are: (1) Dongguan
WBF has been sold in the United States is on file electronically via Enforcement Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Clearwise Co.,
at less than normal value and that and Compliance’s Antidumping and Ltd.; (3) Passwell Corporation; Pleasant Wave Ltd.;
certain companies subject to this Countervailing Duty Centralized
(4) Shanghai JianPu Export & Import Co., Ltd.; (5)
administrative review had no shipments Decca Furniture Ltd.; and (6) Hangzhou Cadman
Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’). Trading Co., Ltd. (Exporter), Haining Changbei
during the POR. ACCESS is available to registered users Furniture Co., Ltd. (Producer).
DATES: Effective February 15, 2017. at http://access.trade.gov and it is 6 See Memorandum from Edward Yang, Senior
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Office VII for Antidumping and
available to all parties in the Central Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments in Part; Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision
Compliance, International Trade 2015, 81 FR 70092 (October 11, 2016) (‘‘Preliminary Memorandum for the Preliminary results of the
Results’’). Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden
Administration, U.S. Department of 2 See the Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for China,’’ dated October 3, 2016 (‘‘Preliminary
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Decision Memorandum’’).
(202) 482–3147. to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary 7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Wooden of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Background China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Final Results of the Eleventh Antidumping Duty Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
On October 11, 2016, the Department Administrative Review’’ (‘‘Issues and Decision FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013).
published, and invited interested parties Memorandum’’). 8 The 11 companies or company groupings with
3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
to comment on, the Preliminary no shipments during the POR are: (1) Dongguan
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang Sunrise Wood
Results.1 We received comments from Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Industry Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmount Designs
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co.,
1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 2005) (‘‘Order’’). Ltd.; (2) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 4 For a complete description of the scope of the Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (3) Golden Well
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:44 Feb 14, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM 15FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_10773/page/1.svg)
![10744 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 15, 2017 / Notices
concerning our finding of no shipments noted above, the cash deposit rate will Recommendation
by these 11 companies. In these final be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, [FR Doc. 2017–03046 Filed 2–14–17; 8:45 am]
results of review, we continue to which is 216.01 percent; (3) for all non- BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
determine that these 11 companies had PRC exporters of subject merchandise
no shipments of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate,
during the POR. For a full discussion of the cash deposit rate will be the rate DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
this determination, see the Preliminary applicable to the PRC exporter that
Decision Memorandum. supplied that non-PRC exporter; (4) if International Trade Administration
the exporter is not a firm covered in this [A–201–837]
Assessment Rates
or any previous review or in the original
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) Tariff less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), but the manufacturer is, the cash- Mexico: Rescission of Antidumping
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department deposit rate will be the rate established Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
has determined, and U.S. Customs and for the most recent period for the 2016
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, manufacturer of the merchandise. These
antidumping duties on all appropriate deposit requirements, when imposed, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
entries of subject merchandise in shall remain in effect until further International Trade Administration,
accordance with the final results of this notice. Department of Commerce.
review. The Department intends to issue SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days Notification to Importers (the Department) is rescinding its
after the publication date of these final This notice also serves as a final administrative review of the
results of review. We intend to instruct reminder to importers of their antidumping duty order on certain
CBP to liquidate POR entries of subject responsibility under 19 CFR magnesia carbon bricks from Mexico for
merchandise from the seven companies, 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate the period of review (POR) September 1,
including Nantong Wangzhuang, which regarding the reimbursement of 2015, through August 31, 2016.
failed to establish their eligibility for antidumping duties prior to liquidation DATES: Effective February 15, 2017.
separate rate status at the rate applicable of the relevant entries during this FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
to the PRC-wide entity. For the 11 review period. Failure to comply with Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD
companies which the Department this requirement could result in the Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
determined had no shipments during Department’s presumption that Compliance, International Trade
the POR, if there are any suspended reimbursement of antidumping duties Administration, U.S. Department of
entries under any of those companies’ occurred and the subsequent assessment Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
antidumping case numbers, they will be of double antidumping duties. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
liquidated at the assessment rate for the (202) 482–1280.
PRC-wide entity.9 Administrative Protective Order
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Cash Deposit Requirements This notice also serves as a reminder
Background
to parties subject to administrative
The following cash deposit On September 8, 2016, the
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
requirements will be effective for Department published in the Federal
responsibility concerning the return or
shipments of the subject merchandise Register a notice of opportunity to
destruction of proprietary information
from the PRC entered, or withdrawn request an administrative review of the
disclosed under the APO in accordance
from warehouse, for consumption on or antidumping duty order on certain
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
after the publication date in the Federal magnesia carbon bricks from Mexico for
continues to govern business
Register of the final results of review, as the POR.1 The Department received a
proprietary information in this segment
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the timely request from the Magnesia
of the proceeding. Timely written
Act: (1) For previously investigated or Carbon Bricks Fair Trade Committee
notification of the return/destruction of
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters (the petitioner), in accordance with
APO materials or conversion to judicial
which are not under review in this section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
protective order is hereby requested.
segment of the proceeding but which as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
Failure to comply with the regulations
have separate rates, the cash deposit rate 351.213(b), to conduct an administrative
and terms of an APO is a violation,
will continue to be the existing review of this antidumping duty order.2
which is subject to sanction.
exporter-specific rate; (2) for all PRC On November 9, 2016, the Department
exporters of subject merchandise that These final results of review are
issued and published in accordance published in the Federal Register a
have not been found to be entitled to a notice of initiation with respect to RHI-
separate rate, including Nantong with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Refmex S.A. de C.V., Trafinsa S.A. de
Wangzhuang and the six companies C.V., Vesuvius Mexico S.A. de C.V., and
Dated: February 8, 2017. Ferro Alliages & Mineraux Inc.3 On
International (HK) Ltd.; (4) Jiangsu Tairui Structure Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Engineering Co., Ltd.; (5) Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork
February 3, 2017, the petitioner timely
Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial Ltd. (H.K. Ltd.); Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
(6) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (7) and Compliance. 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (9) Appendix to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 62096
Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., (September 8, 2016).
Summary
Ltd.; (10) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.; and (11) 2 See Letter from the petitioner, regarding
Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment
Background ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from Mexico:
Co., Ltd. Scope of the Order Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
9 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Discussion of the Issue Comment: The September 30, 2016.
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Department Should Make Determinations 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Necessary to Address Circumvention and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
(October 24, 2011). Evasion of the Antidumping Order 78778, 78781 (November 9, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:44 Feb 14, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM 15FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_10773/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-02-15 00:55:03
Document Modified: 2017-02-15 00:55:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective February 15, 2017. | |
| Contact | Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 10743 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR