82 FR 10842 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 30 (February 15, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10842-10844]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission; Office of FOIA Services; 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 
20549-2736.

Extension:

[[Page 10843]]

    Rule 17a-10; SEC File No. 270-507, OMB Control No. 3235-0563.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(``OMB'') a request for extension of the previously approved collection 
of information discussed below.
    Section 17(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act''), 
generally prohibits affiliated persons of a registered investment 
company (``fund'') from borrowing money or other property from, or 
selling or buying securities or other property to or from, the fund or 
any company that the fund controls.\1\ Section 2(a)(3) of the Act 
defines ``affiliated person'' of a fund to include its investment 
advisers.\2\ Rule 17a-10 (17 CFR 270.17a-10) permits (i) a subadviser 
\3\ of a fund to enter into transactions with funds the subadviser does 
not advise but that are affiliated persons of a fund that it does 
advise (e.g., other funds in the fund complex), and (ii) a subadviser 
(and its affiliated persons) to enter into transactions and 
arrangements with funds the subadviser does advise, but only with 
respect to discrete portions of the subadvised fund for which the 
subadviser does not provide investment advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(a).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(3)(E).
    \3\ As defined in rule 17a-10(b)(2). 17 CFR 270.17a-10(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To qualify for the exemptions in rule 17a-10, the subadvisory 
relationship must be the sole reason why section 17(a) prohibits the 
transaction. In addition, the advisory contracts of the subadviser 
entering into the transaction, and any subadviser that is advising the 
purchasing portion of the fund, must prohibit the subadvisers from 
consulting with each other concerning securities transactions of the 
fund, and limit their responsibility to providing advice with respect 
to discrete portions of the fund's portfolio.\4\ Section 17(a) of the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act''), generally prohibits 
affiliated persons of a registered investment company (``fund'') from 
borrowing money or other property from, or selling or buying securities 
or other property to or from, the fund or any company that the fund 
controls. Section 2(a)(3) of the Act defines ``affiliated person'' of a 
fund to include its investment advisers. Rule 17a-10 permits (i) a 
subadviser of a fund to enter into transactions with funds the 
subadviser does not advise but that are affiliated persons of a fund 
that it does advise (e.g., other funds in the fund complex), and (ii) a 
subadviser (and its affiliated persons) to enter into transactions and 
arrangements with funds the subadviser does advise, but only with 
respect to discrete portions of the subadvised fund for which the 
subadviser does not provide investment advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 270.17a-10(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To qualify for the exemptions in rule 17a-10, the subadvisory 
relationship must be the sole reason why section 17(a) prohibits the 
transaction. In addition, the advisory contracts of the subadviser 
entering into the transaction, and any subadviser that is advising the 
purchasing portion of the fund, must prohibit the subadvisers from 
consulting with each other concerning securities transactions of the 
fund, and limit their responsibility to providing advice with respect 
to discrete portions of the fund's portfolio. This requirement 
regarding the prohibitions and limitations in advisory contracts of 
subadvisors relying on the rule constitutes a collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 44 U.S.C. 3501.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The staff assumes that all existing funds with subadvisory 
contracts amended those contracts to comply with the adoption of rule 
17a-10 in 2003, which conditioned certain exemptions upon these 
contractual alterations, and therefore there is no continuing burden 
for those funds.\6\ However, the staff assumes that all newly formed 
subadvised funds, and funds that enter into new contracts with 
subadvisers, will incur the one-time burden by amending their contracts 
to add the terms required by the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Transactions of Investment Companies With Portfolio and 
Subadviser Affiliates, Investment Company Act Release No. 25888 
(Jan. 14, 2003) [68 FR 3153, (Jan. 22, 2003)]. We assume that funds 
formed after 2003 that intended to rely on rule 17a-10 would have 
included the required provision as a standard element in their 
initial subadvisory contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on an analysis of fund filings, the staff estimates that 
approximately 319 funds enter into new subadvisory agreements each 
year.\7\ Based on discussions with industry representatives, the staff 
estimates that it will require approximately 3 attorney hours to draft 
and execute additional clauses in new subadvisory contracts in order 
for funds and subadvisers to be able to rely on the exemptions in rule 
17a-10. Because these additional clauses are identical to the clauses 
that a fund would need to insert in their subadvisory contracts to rely 
on rules 10f-3, 12d3-1, and 17e-1, and because we believe that funds 
that use one such rule generally use all of these rules, we apportion 
this 3 hour time burden equally among all four rules. Therefore, we 
estimate that the burden allocated to rule 17a-10 for this contract 
change would be 0.75 hours.\8\ Assuming that all 319 funds that enter 
into new subadvisory contracts each year make the modification to their 
contract required by the rule, we estimate that the rule's contract 
modification requirement will result in 239 burden hours annually, with 
an associated cost of approximately $90,820.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Based on data from Morningstar, as of June 2016, there are 
12,485 registered funds (open-end funds, closed-end funds, and 
exchange-traded funds), 4,629 funds of which have subadvisory 
relationships (approximately 37%). Based on data from the 2016 ICI 
Factbook, 862 new funds were established in 2015 (594 open-end funds 
+ 258 exchange-traded funds + 10 closed-end funds (from the ICI 
Research Perspective, April 2016)). 862 new funds x 37% = 319 funds.
    \8\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 3 hours 
/ 4 rules = 0.75 hours.
    \9\ These estimates are based on the following calculations: 
(0.75 hours x 319 portfolios = 239 burden hours); ($380 per hour x 
239 hours = $90,820 total cost). The Commission's estimates 
concerning the wage rates for attorney time are based on salary 
information for the securities industry compiled by the Securities 
Industry and Financial Markets Association. The estimated wage 
figure is based on published rates for in-house attorneys, modified 
to account for a 1,800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to 
account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits, and overhead, 
yielding an effective hourly rate of $380. See Securities Industry 
and Financial Markets Association, Report on Management & 
Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the 
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived 
from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the 
costs of Commission rules. Complying with this collection of 
information requirement is necessary to obtain the benefit of relying 
on rule 17a-10. Responses will not be kept confidential. An agency may 
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control 
number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this 
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov. 
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: 
[email protected]; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549

[[Page 10844]]

or send an email to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to 
OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: February 8, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-02974 Filed 2-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P