82 FR 11513 - VNT1 Protein in Potato; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 36 (February 24, 2017)

Page Range		11513-11515
FR Document		2017-03580

This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of VNT1 protein in potato when used as a plant-incorporated protectant. J.R. Simplot Company submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting a permanent exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of VNT1 protein in potato under FFDCA.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 36 (Friday, February 24, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 36 (Friday, February 24, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11513-11515]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03580]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 174

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457; FRL-9957-97]


VNT1 Protein in Potato; Exemption From the Requirement of a 
Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of VNT1 protein in potato when used as a 
plant-incorporated protectant. J.R. Simplot Company submitted a 
petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 
requesting a permanent exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. 
This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible 
level for residues of VNT1 protein in potato under FFDCA.

DATES: This regulation is effective February 24, 2017. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 25, 2017 and 
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR 
part 178 (see also

[[Page 11514]]

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and 
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email 
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
April 25, 2017. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and 
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional 
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more 
information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background

    In the Federal Register of April 25, 2016 (81 FR 24047) (FRL-9944-
86), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance 
petition (PP 5F8425) by J.R. Simplot Co., 5369 W. Irving St., Boise, ID 
83706. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 174 be amended by 
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for 
residues of VNT1 protein in potato. That document referenced a summary 
of the petition prepared by the petitioner J.R. Simplot Company, which 
is available in the docket via http://www.regulations.gov. There were 
no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
    EPA previously established a temporary exemption from tolerance for 
VNT1 protein in potato (40 CFR 174.534; 80 FR 9387) in conjunction with 
an Experimental Use Permit (8917-EUP-2) in 2015. This temporary 
exemption was subsequently amended (extended) on December 17, 2015 and 
expires on April 1, 2017.

III. Final Rule

A. EPA's Safety Determination

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include 
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in 
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in 
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption, 
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide 
chemical residue . . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) 
requires that EPA consider ``available information concerning the 
cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and 
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on VNT1 
protein and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability, as 
well as the relationship of this information to human risk. A full 
explanation of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment 
based on that data can be found within the December 6, 2016, document 
entitled ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations 
for VNT1 protein.'' This document, as well as other relevant 
information, is available in the docket

[[Page 11515]]

for this action as described under ADDRESSES. Based upon its 
evaluation, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no 
harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and 
children, from aggregate exposure to residues of VNT1 protein. 
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is 
established for residues of VNT1 protein in potato when used as a 
plant-incorporated protectant in accordance with the terms of 
registration.

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    EPA has determined that an analytical method is not required for 
enforcement purposes since the Agency is establishing an exemption from 
the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation. 
Nonetheless, an analytical method was provided by J.R. Simplot for the 
detection of VNT1 protein in potato. This method utilizes a 
quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect the presence of 
the Rpi-vntl gene in pSIM1678 transformed plants (pSIM1678 is the 
transformation vector used by the registrant to incorporate the Rpi-
vntl gene into potato varieties). There are numerous homologs of Rpi-
vnt1 present in potato and tomato varieties and other wild Solanum 
species that may result in non-specific amplification when using 
primers designed to amplify Rpi-vnt1. To distinguish between plants 
that naturally contain homologous sequences and those transformed with 
pSIM1678, a second method amplifies a unique junction between the Rpi-
vnt1 terminator and the AGP promoter present in the pSIM1678 T-DNA. 
This second method is intended to confirm the presence or absence of 
pSIM1678 if there are false positive detection of Rpi-vnt1 homologs.

C. Revisions to Requested Tolerance Exemption

    The current temporary tolerance exemption for VNT1 protein in 
potato (40 CFR 174.534) approved by EPA on December 17, 2015, will be 
changed to a permanent tolerance exemption.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 
408(d) in response to a petition submitted to EPA. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any 
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal 
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and 
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance 
exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed 
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes. As a result, this 
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this 
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal 
governments, on the relationship between the national government and 
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the 
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that 
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and 
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not 
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as 
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 18, 2017.
Jack Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 174--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 174 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7. U.S.C. 136-136y; 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. Revise Sec.  174.534 to read as follows:


Sec.  174.534   VNT1 protein; exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance.

    Residues of VNT1 protein in potato are exempt from the requirement 
of a tolerance when the Rpi-vnt1 gene that express the VNT1 protein is 
used as a plant-incorporated protectant in potato.

[FR Doc. 2017-03580 Filed 2-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

11514 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY objection to any aspect of this regulation the docket via http://
INFORMATION). and may also request a hearing on those www.regulations.gov. There were no
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, objections. You must file your objection comments received in response to the
identified by docket identification (ID) or request a hearing on this regulation notice of filing.
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0457, is in accordance with the instructions EPA previously established a
available at http://www.regulations.gov provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure temporary exemption from tolerance for
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs proper receipt by EPA, you must VNT1 protein in potato (40 CFR
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 174.534; 80 FR 9387) in conjunction
in the Environmental Protection Agency OPP–2014–0457 in the subject line on with an Experimental Use Permit (8917–
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William the first page of your submission. All EUP–2) in 2015. This temporary
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 objections and requests for a hearing exemption was subsequently amended
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC must be in writing, and must be (extended) on December 17, 2015 and
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room received by the Hearing Clerk on or expires on April 1, 2017.
before April 25, 2017. Addresses for
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., III. Final Rule
mail and hand delivery of objections
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
and hearing requests are provided in 40 A. EPA’s Safety Determination
holidays. The telephone number for the
CFR 178.25(b). Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, In addition to filing an objection or
and the telephone number for the OPP allows EPA to establish an exemption
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review from the requirement for a tolerance (the
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
the visitor instructions and additional legal limit for a pesticide chemical
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
information about the docket available residue in or on a food) only if EPA
any Confidential Business Information
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information not marked confidential Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), disclosed publicly by EPA without prior reasonable certainty that no harm will
Office of Pesticide Programs, notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your result from aggregate exposure to the
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 objection or hearing request, identified pesticide chemical residue, including
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– all anticipated dietary exposures and all
DC 20460–0001; main telephone 2014–0457, by one of the following other exposures for which there is
number: (703) 305–7090; email address: methods: reliable information.’’ This includes
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// exposure through drinking water and in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: www.regulations.gov. Follow the online residential settings but does not include
instructions for submitting comments. occupational exposure. Pursuant to
I. General Information FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
Do not submit electronically any
A. Does this action apply to me? information you consider to be CBI or establishing or maintaining in effect an
other information whose disclosure is exemption from the requirement of a
You may be potentially affected by tolerance, EPA must take into account
this action if you are an agricultural restricted by statute.
producer, food manufacturer, or • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental the factors set forth in FFDCA section
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give
pesticide manufacturer. The following special consideration to exposure of
list of North American Industrial DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. infants and children to the pesticide
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
• Hand Delivery: To make special chemical residue in establishing a
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather tolerance or tolerance exemption, and to
arrangements for hand delivery or
provides a guide to help readers ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable
delivery of boxed information, please
determine whether this document certainty that no harm will result to
follow the instructions at http://
applies to them. Potentially affected infants and children from aggregate
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
entities may include: exposure to the pesticide chemical
• Crop production (NAICS code 111). Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more residue . . . .’’ Additionally, FFDCA
• Animal production (NAICS code
information about dockets generally, is section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that EPA
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code available at http://www.epa.gov/ consider ‘‘available information
311). dockets. concerning the cumulative effects of [a
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS particular pesticide’s] . . . residues and
II. Background other substances that have a common
code 32532).
In the Federal Register of April 25, mechanism of toxicity.’’
B. How can I get electronic access to 2016 (81 FR 24047) (FRL–9944–86), EPA evaluated the available toxicity
other related information? EPA issued a document pursuant to and exposure data on VNT1 protein and
You may access a frequently updated FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. considered its validity, completeness,
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a and reliability, as well as the
through the Government Printing pesticide tolerance petition (PP 5F8425) relationship of this information to
Office’s e-CFR site at http:// by J.R. Simplot Co., 5369 W. Irving St., human risk. A full explanation of the
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- Boise, ID 83706. The petition requested data upon which EPA relied and its risk
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES

idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/ that 40 CFR part 174 be amended by assessment based on that data can be
40tab_02.tpl. establishing an exemption from the found within the December 6, 2016,
requirement of a tolerance for residues document entitled ‘‘Federal Food, Drug,
C. How can I file an objection or hearing of VNT1 protein in potato. That and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
request? document referenced a summary of the Considerations for VNT1 protein.’’ This
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 petition prepared by the petitioner J.R. document, as well as other relevant
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an Simplot Company, which is available in information, is available in the docket

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:13 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM 24FER1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 11515

for this action as described under not subject to Executive Order 13211, submit a report containing this rule and
ADDRESSES. Based upon its evaluation, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning other required information to the U.S.
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable Regulations That Significantly Affect Senate, the U.S. House of
certainty that no harm will result to the Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 Representatives, and the Comptroller
U.S. population, including infants and FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive General of the United States prior to
children, from aggregate exposure to Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of publication of the rule in the Federal
residues of VNT1 protein. Therefore, an Children from Environmental Health Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
exemption from the requirement of a Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
tolerance is established for residues of April 23, 1997). This action does not
VNT1 protein in potato when used as a contain any information collections List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174
plant-incorporated protectant in subject to OMB approval under the Environmental protection,
accordance with the terms of Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 Administrative practice and procedure,
registration. U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements.
EPA has determined that an analytical ‘‘Federal Actions to Address
method is not required for enforcement Dated: January 18, 2017.
Environmental Justice in Minority
purposes since the Agency is Populations and Low-Income Jack Housenger,
establishing an exemption from the Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
requirement of a tolerance without any 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
numerical limitation. Nonetheless, an Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows:
analytical method was provided by J.R. are established on the basis of a petition
Simplot for the detection of VNT1 under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 174—[AMENDED]
protein in potato. This method utilizes the tolerance exemption in this action,
a quantitative polymerase chain reaction do not require the issuance of a ■ 1. The authority citation for part 174
(qPCR) to detect the presence of the Rpi- proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows:
vntl gene in pSIM1678 transformed Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 Authority: 7. U.S.C. 136–136y; 21 U.S.C.
plants (pSIM1678 is the transformation U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. 321(q), 346a and 371.
vector used by the registrant to This action directly regulates growers,
incorporate the Rpi-vntl gene into potato food processors, food handlers, and food ■ 2. Revise § 174.534 to read as follows:
varieties). There are numerous retailers, not States or tribes. As a result,
§ 174.534 VNT1 protein; exemption from
homologs of Rpi-vnt1 present in potato this action does not alter the
the requirement of a tolerance.
and tomato varieties and other wild relationships or distribution of power
Solanum species that may result in non- and responsibilities established by Residues of VNT1 protein in potato
specific amplification when using Congress in the preemption provisions are exempt from the requirement of a
primers designed to amplify Rpi-vnt1. of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, tolerance when the Rpi-vnt1 gene that
To distinguish between plants that EPA has determined that this action will express the VNT1 protein is used as a
naturally contain homologous not have a substantial direct effect on plant-incorporated protectant in potato.
sequences and those transformed with States or tribal governments, on the [FR Doc. 2017–03580 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am]
pSIM1678, a second method amplifies a relationship between the national BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
unique junction between the Rpi-vnt1 government and the States or tribal
terminator and the AGP promoter governments, or on the distribution of
present in the pSIM1678 T–DNA. This power and responsibilities among the
second method is intended to confirm various levels of government or between SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
the presence or absence of pSIM1678 if the Federal Government and Indian
there are false positive detection of Rpi- tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that 49 CFR Part 1250
vnt1 homologs. Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, [Docket No. EP 724 (Sub-No. 4)]
C. Revisions to Requested Tolerance 1999), and Executive Order 13175,
Exemption entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination United States Rail Service Issues—
The current temporary tolerance with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR Performance Data Reporting
exemption for VNT1 protein in potato 67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply Correction
(40 CFR 174.534) approved by EPA on to this action. In addition, this action
December 17, 2015, will be changed to does not impose any enforceable duty or In rule document 2017–02492,
a permanent tolerance exemption. contain any unfunded mandate as appearing on pages 9529–9529, in the
IV. Statutory and Executive Order described under Title II of the Unfunded issue of Tuesday, February 7, 2017,
Reviews Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. make the following correction:
1501 et seq.). On page 9529, in the third column,
This action establishes a tolerance This action does not involve any the signature block should read as
exemption under FFDCA section 408(d) technical standards that would require follows:
in response to a petition submitted to EPA’s consideration of voluntary
EPA. The Office of Management and Decided: January 27, 2017.
consensus standards pursuant to section
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 12(d) of the National Technology By the Board, Acting Chairman Begeman,
of actions from review under Executive Vice Chairman Miller, and Commissioner
Transfer and Advancement Act Elliott.
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, Brendetta S. Jones,
October 4, 1993). Because this action V. Congressional Review Act Clearance Clerk.
has been exempted from review under Pursuant to the Congressional Review [FR Doc. C1–2017–02492 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am]
Executive Order 12866, this action is Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will BILLING CODE 1301–00–D

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:13 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM 24FER1

Document Created: 2017-02-24 01:17:10
Document Modified: 2017-02-24 01:17:10

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This regulation is effective February 24, 2017. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before April 25, 2017 and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
Contact		Robert McNally, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email
FR Citation		82 FR 11513
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements