82 FR 11534 - Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber From Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 36 (February 24, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 36 (February 24, 2017)
| Page Range | 11534-11536 | |
| FR Document | 2017-03625 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 36 (Friday, February 24, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 11534-11536] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-03625] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-201-848] Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber From Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily determines that emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber (ESB rubber) from Mexico is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. DATES: Effective February 24, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Hancock or Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1394 or (202) 482-2243, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department published the notice of initiation of this investigation on August 19, 2016.\1\ The Department postponed the preliminary determination of this investigation until February 16, 2017.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and Poland: Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81 FR 55438 (August 19, 2016) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and Poland: Postponement of Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81 FR 85208 (November 25, 2016). \3\ See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcment and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the Less Than Fair Value Investigation Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Mexico,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is ESB rubber from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. Scope Comments In accordance with the preamble to the Department's regulations,\4\ the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).\5\ No interested party commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. The Department is not preliminarily modifying the scope language as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). \5\ See Initiation Notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with section 731 of the Act. Constructed export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772(b) of the Act. Normal value (NV) is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. All-Others Rate Sections 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that in the preliminary determination the Department shall determine an estimated all-others rate for all exporters and producers not individually investigated, which shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, [[Page 11535]] excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. The Department calculated a company-specific rate for Industrias Negromex S.A. de C.V.--Planta Altamira (Negromex) that is not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. Therefore, for purposes of determining the ``all-others'' rate and pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we are using the weighted- average dumping margin calculated for Negromex as the estimated weighted-average dumping margin assigned to all other producers and exporters of the merchandise under consideration. Preliminary Determination The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margins (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Industrias Negromex S.A. de C.V.--Planta Altamira........... 13.77 All-Others.................................................. 13.77 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, the Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of subject merchandise as described in the scope of the investigation section entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, as discussed below. Further, pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the weighted-average amount by which normal value exceeds U.S. price. These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed to interested parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we intend to verify information relied upon in making our final determination. Public Comment Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven days after the date on which the final verification report is issued in this proceeding, and rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\6\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides that a final determination may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of an affirmative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is made by exporters who account for a significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise, or in the event of a negative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is made by the petitioners. Section 351.210(e)(2) of the Department's regulations requires that requests by respondents for postponement of a final antidumping determination be accompanied by a request for extension of provisional measures from a four-month period to a period not more than six months in duration. On January 24, 2017, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.210(e), Negromex requested that the Department postpone the final determination and that provisional measures be extended to a period not to exceed six months.\7\ In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), because: (1) Our preliminary determination is affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter accounts for a significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise; and (3) no compelling reasons for denial exist, we are postponing the final determination and extending the provisional measures from a four-month period to a period not greater than six months. Accordingly, we will make our final determination no later than 135 days after the date of publication of this preliminary determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from Negromex entitled, ``Negromex's Request for Extension of Final Determination and Provisional Measures,'' dated January 24, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we are notifying the International Trade Commission (ITC) of our preliminary determination. If our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after our final determination whether these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry. This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: February 16, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation For purposes of this investigation, the product covered is cold- polymerized emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber (ESB rubber). The scope of the investigation includes, but is not limited to, ESB rubber in primary forms, bales, granules, crumbs, pellets, powders, plates, sheets, strip, etc. ESB rubber consists of non-pigmented rubbers and oil-extended non-pigmented rubbers, both of which contain at least one percent of organic acids from the emulsion polymerization process. ESB rubber is produced and sold in accordance with a generally accepted set of product specifications issued by the International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers (IISRP). The scope of the investigation covers grades of ESB rubber included in the IISRP 1500 and 1700 series of synthetic rubbers. The 1500 grades are light in color and are often described as ``Clear'' or ``White Rubber.'' The 1700 grades [[Page 11536]] are oil-extended and thus darker in color, and are often called ``Brown Rubber.'' Specifically excluded from the scope of this investigation are products which are manufactured by blending ESB rubber with other polymers, high styrene resin master batch, carbon black master batch (i.e., IISRP 1600 series and 1800 series) and latex (an intermediate product). The products subject to this investigation are currently classifiable under subheadings 4002.19.0015 and 4002.19.0019 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). ESB rubber is described by Chemical Abstract Services (CAS) Registry No. 9003- 55-8. This CAS number also refers to other types of styrene butadiene rubber. Although the HTSUS subheadings and CAS registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Investigation IV. Scope Comments V. Discussion of the Methodology A. Determination of the Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis VI. Date of Sale VII. Product Comparisons VIII. Constructed Export Price IX. Normal Value A. Home Market Viability B. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arms'-Length Test C. Level of Trade D. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis 1. Calculation of COP 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test E. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison Market Prices X. Currency Conversion [FR Doc. 2017-03625 Filed 2-23-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![11534 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Notices
States falls within the scope of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Memorandum is included as Appendix
order.6 II to this notice. The Preliminary
International Trade Administration Decision Memorandum is a public
Continuation of the Order document and is on file electronically
[A–201–848]
As a result of the determinations by via Enforcement and Compliance’s
the Department and the ITC that Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
revocation of the AD duty order would From Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Centralized Electronic Service System
Determination of Sales at Less Than (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
likely lead to a continuation or
Fair Value, Postponement of Final registered users at https://
recurrence of dumping and material
Determination, and Extension of access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
injury to an industry in the United
Provisional Measures Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of main Department of Commerce
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, building. In addition, a complete
Department hereby orders the International Trade Administration, version of the Preliminary Decision
continuation of the AD duty order on Department of Commerce. Memorandum can be accessed directly
wooden bedroom furniture from the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
PRC. U.S. Customs and Border (the Department) preliminarily The signed Preliminary Decision
Protection will continue to collect AD determines that emulsion styrene- Memorandum and the electronic
duty cash deposits at the rates in effect butadiene rubber (ESB rubber) from version are identical in content.
at the time of entry for all imports of Mexico is being, or is likely to be, sold
subject merchandise. The effective date Scope of the Investigation
in the United States at less than fair
of the continuation of the order will be value (LTFV). The period of The product covered by this
the date of publication in the Federal investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015, investigation is ESB rubber from
Register of this notice of continuation. through June 30, 2016. Mexico. For a complete description of
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act DATES: Effective February 24, 2017. the scope of this investigation, see
and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), the Appendix I.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Department intends to initiate the next Hancock or Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Scope Comments
five-year review of the order not later Operations, Office V, Enforcement and In accordance with the preamble to
than 30 days prior to the fifth Compliance, International Trade the Department’s regulations,4 the
anniversary of the effective date of Administration, U.S. Department of
Initiation Notice set aside a period of
continuation. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
time for parties to raise issues regarding
This five-year sunset review and this NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
product coverage (i.e., scope).5 No
notice are in accordance with section (202) 482–1394 or (202) 482–2243,
interested party commented on the
751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and respectively.
scope of the investigation as it appeared
published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: in the Initiation Notice. The Department
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). is not preliminarily modifying the scope
Background
language as it appeared in the Initiation
Administrative Protective Order This preliminary determination is Notice.
made in accordance with section 733(b)
This notice also serves as the only Methodology
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
reminder to parties subject to
(the Act). The Department published the The Department is conducting this
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) notice of initiation of this investigation investigation in accordance with section
of their responsibility concerning the on August 19, 2016.1 The Department 731 of the Act. Constructed export
return/destruction or conversion to postponed the preliminary prices have been calculated in
judicial protective order of proprietary determination of this investigation until accordance with section 772(b) of the
information disclosed under APO in February 16, 2017.2 For a complete Act. Normal value (NV) is calculated in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). description of the events that followed accordance with section 773 of the Act.
Failure to comply is a violation of the the initiation of this investigation, see For a full description of the
APO which may be subject to sanctions. the Preliminary Decision methodology underlying our
Dated: February 17, 2017. Memorandum.3 A list of topics included preliminary conclusions, see the
Ronald K. Lorentzen, in the Preliminary Decision Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 1 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from All-Others Rate
and Compliance. Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and Poland: Sections 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and
[FR Doc. 2017–03639 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am] Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81
FR 55438 (August 19, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that in
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 2 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the preliminary determination the
Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and Poland: Department shall determine an
Postponement of Preliminary Determination of estimated all-others rate for all exporters
Sales at Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81 FR and producers not individually
85208 (November 25, 2016).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6 For a full description of the scope of the order,
3 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, investigated, which shall be an amount
including exclusions, see Final Results and the
accompanying ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcment and equal to the weighted average of the
for the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate estimated weighted-average dumping
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and margins established for exporters and
Antidumping Duty Order on Wooden Bedroom
Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ‘‘Decision
Furniture from the People’s Republic of China’’ Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in
producers individually investigated,
from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary the Less Than Fair Value Investigation Emulsion
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Mexico,’’ dated 4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
Enforcement and Compliance. notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 5 See Initiation Notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_11570/page/1.svg)
![11536 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Notices
are oil-extended and thus darker in color, determines that emulsion styrene- Memorandum and the electronic
and are often called ‘‘Brown Rubber.’’ butadiene rubber (ESB rubber) from the version are identical in content.
Specifically excluded from the scope of Republic of Korea (Korea) is being, or is
this investigation are products which are Scope of the Investigation
likely to be, sold in the United States at
manufactured by blending ESB rubber with The product covered by this
other polymers, high styrene resin master
less than fair value (LTFV). The period
of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015, investigation is ESB rubber from Korea.
batch, carbon black master batch (i.e., IISRP
1600 series and 1800 series) and latex (an through June 30, 2016. For a complete description of the scope
intermediate product). DATES: Effective February 24, 2017.
of this investigation, see Appendix I.
The products subject to this investigation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scope Comments
are currently classifiable under subheadings
4002.19.0015 and 4002.19.0019 of the
Carrie Bethea or Kabir Archuletta, AD/ In accordance with the preamble to
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement the Department’s regulations,4 the
States (HTSUS). ESB rubber is described by and Compliance, International Trade Initiation Notice set aside a period of
Chemical Abstract Services (CAS) Registry Administration, U.S. Department of time for interested parties to raise issues
No. 9003–55–8. This CAS number also refers Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).5
to other types of styrene butadiene rubber. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: No interested party commented on the
Although the HTSUS subheadings and CAS (202) 482–1491 or (202) 482–2593, scope of the investigation as it appeared
registry number are provided for convenience respectively. in the Initiation Notice. The Department
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this investigation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: is not preliminarily modifying the scope
is dispositive. language as it appeared in the Initiation
Background Notice.
Appendix II This preliminary determination is Methodology
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary made in accordance with section 733(b)
Decision Memorandum of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
I. Summary (the Act). The Department published the
731 of the Act. The Department has
II. Background notice of initiation of this investigation
III. Period of Investigation calculated export prices in accordance
on August 19, 2016.1 The Department
IV. Scope Comments with section 772(a) of the Act.
postponed the preliminary
V. Discussion of the Methodology Constructed export prices have been
determination of this investigation until
A. Determination of the Comparison calculated in accordance with section
February 16, 2017.2 For a complete
Method 773 of the Act. Normal value (NV) For
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
description of the events that followed
a full description of the methodology
Analysis the initiation of this investigation, see
underlying our preliminary conclusions,
VI. Date of Sale the Preliminary Decision
see the Preliminary Decision
VII. Product Comparisons Memorandum.3 A list of topics included
Memorandum.
VIII. Constructed Export Price in the Preliminary Decision
IX. Normal Value Memorandum is included as Appendix Preliminary Affirmative Determination
A. Home Market Viability II to this notice. The Preliminary of Critical Circumstances, in Part
B. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arms’- Decision Memorandum is a public
Length Test In accordance with section 733(e) of
document and is on file electronically the Act and 19 CFR 351.206, we
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
via Enforcement and Compliance’s preliminarily find that critical
1. Calculation of COP Antidumping and Countervailing Duty circumstances do not exist for LG Chem,
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices Centralized Electronic Service System Ltd. (LG Chem). However, because
3. Results of the COP Test (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to Daewoo International Corporation
E. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison registered users at https:// (Daewoo) and Kumho Petrochemical Co,
Market Prices access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Ltd (Kumho) did not respond to the
X. Currency Conversion Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the Department’s questionnaires, we have
[FR Doc. 2017–03625 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am] main Department of Commerce determined pursuant to sections 776(a)
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P building. In addition, a complete and (b) of the Act, that critical
version of the Preliminary Decision circumstances exist for both Daewoo
Memorandum can be accessed directly and Kumho as adverse facts available
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. (AFA). For a full description of the
International Trade Administration The signed Preliminary Decision methodology and results of our critical
circumstances analysis, see the
[A–580–890] 1 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and Poland:
Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81 Adverse Facts Available
FR 55438 (August 19, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
From the Republic of Korea: 2 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Daewoo and Kumho were each
Preliminary Affirmative Determination Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and Poland: selected as a mandatory respondent, but
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Preliminary Determination of each failed to respond to the
Affirmative Determination of Critical Sales at Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81 FR Department’s questionnaires.
85208 (November 25, 2016).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Circumstances, in Part, Postponement 3 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Accordingly, we preliminarily
of Final Determination, and Extension Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and determine to based their dumping
of Provisional Measures Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate margins on AFA, in accordance with
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act and 19
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ‘‘Decision
CFR 351.308. As AFA, we applied the
International Trade Administration, Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in
Department of Commerce. the Less Than Fair Value Investigation of Emulsion
4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Korea,’’ dated
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
(the Department) preliminarily notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 5 See Initiation Notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_11570/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-02-24 01:17:31
Document Modified: 2017-02-24 01:17:31
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective February 24, 2017. | |
| Contact | Julia Hancock or Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1394 or (202) 482-2243, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 11534 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR