82 FR 11674 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rules 6.62, 6.73 and Make a Conforming Change to Rule 6.47A
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 36 (February 24, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 36 (February 24, 2017)
| Page Range | 11674-11676 | |
| FR Document | 2017-03572 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 36 (Friday, February 24, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 11674-11676] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-03572] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-80059; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2017-16] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rules 6.62, 6.73 and Make a Conforming Change to Rule 6.47A February 17, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on February 10, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.62 to eliminate Price Improving Orders and Quotes, and amend Rule 6.73 to eliminate the electronic and open outcry bidding and offering requirements associated with a Price Improving Order or Quote, and make a conforming change to Rule 6.47A. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.62 to eliminate Price Improving Orders and Quotes, and amend Rule 6.73 to eliminate the electronic and open outcry bidding and offering requirements associated with a Price Improving Order or Quote, and make a conforming change to Rule 6.47A. The Exchange proposes to eliminate these order types in order to streamline its rules and reduce complexity among its order type offerings.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See e.g., Mary Jo White, Chair, Securities and Exchange Commission, Speech at the Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. Global Exchange and Brokerage Conference (June 5, 2014) (available at www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370542004312#.U5HI-fmwJiw) (``I am asking the exchanges to conduct a comprehensive review of their order types and how they operate in practice. As part of this review, I expect that the exchanges will consider appropriate rule changes to help clarify the nature of their order types and how they interact with each other, and how they support fair, orderly, and efficient markets.'' Id.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Elimination of Price Improving Orders and Quotes The Exchange proposes to eliminate, and thus delete from its rules, Price Improving Orders and Quotes, as defined in Rule 6.62(s). A Price Improving Order or Price Improving Quote is an order or quote to buy or sell an option at a specified price at an increment smaller than the minimum price variation in the security. Price Improving Orders and Quotes may be entered in increments as small as one cent. Because the Exchange has not implemented this functionality, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to delete the functionality from its rules.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Though originally adopted as a competitive response to another options market introducing price improving orders, the Exchange never implemented this functionality for a variety of reasons, including technology and because most options volume was concentrated in Penny Pilot issues where price improving orders would be of little or no value. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To reflect this elimination, the Exchange proposes to delete all references to Price Improving Orders and Quotes in Rule 6.62(s), and to the electronic and open outcry bidding and offering requirements associated with a Price Improving Order or Quote in the second introductory paragraph of Rule 6.73 and Rules 6.73(a), 6.73(b) and 6.73(c), and to delete in the Commentary to Rule 6.47A references to Rule 6.62(s) and 6.73, as follows: \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58079 (July 2, 2008), 73 FR 39365 (July 9, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-69) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to permit use of a new order type known as Price Improving Orders and Quotes). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 11675]]Delete Rule 6.62(s), which defines Price Improving Orders and Quotes; delete the second introductory paragraph of Rule 6.73, which describes which options may be designated for penny price improvement; delete Rule 6.73(a), which describes the electronic submission process in connection with a Price Improving Order or Quote; delete Rule 6.73(b), which describes the open outcry submission process in connection with a Price Improving Order or Quote; delete Rule 6.73(c), which describes the requirement to electronically ``sweep'' any penny pricing interest in the Exchange's System; and delete in the Commentary to Rule 6.47A references to Rules 6.62(s) and 6.73.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ An affiliated Exchange recently eliminated Price Improving Orders and Quotes. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-79875 (January 30, 2017), 82 FR 9256 (February 3, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017- 03) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change amending rules). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \8\ of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specifically, the Exchange believes that eliminating Price Improving Orders and Quotes would remove impediments to and perfect a national market system by simplifying the functionality and complexity of its order types. The Exchange believes that eliminating these order types would be consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors because investors will not be harmed and in fact would benefit from the removal of complex functionality. The Exchange also believes that eliminating Price Improving Orders and Quotes would benefit investors and add transparency and clarity to the Exchange's rules because the functionality of those order types was not implemented and therefore is not available. The Exchange further believes that deleting a corresponding reference in Exchange rules to deleted order types, and the associated bidding and offering process in connection with a deleted order type, also removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by ensuring that members, regulators and the public can more easily navigate the Exchange's rulebook and better understand the order types available for trading on the Exchange. Removing an obsolete cross reference also furthers the goal of transparency and adds clarity to the Exchange's rules. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not designed to address any competitive issue but would rather eliminate complex functionality and references to functionality that is not available, thereby reducing confusion and making the Exchange's rules easier to understand and navigate. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\ Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b- 4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\13\ the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \14\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-16 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-16. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public [[Page 11676]] Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-16 and should be submitted on or before March 17, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-03572 Filed 2-23-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![11674 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Notices
of P.M.-settled S&P 500 Index options SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
with expirations every Friday of the COMMISSION Statement of the Purpose of, and the
month.20 The Commission believes that Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
the proposal can thus benefit investors [Release No. 34–80059; File No. SR– Change
by providing them with additional NYSEArca–2017–16] 1. Purpose
trading flexibility for both simple and
complex orders. Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE The Exchange proposes to amend
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Rule 6.62 to eliminate Price Improving
Further, the Exchange represents that
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Orders and Quotes, and amend Rule
there are minimal differences in the
Rule Change Amending Rules 6.62, 6.73 to eliminate the electronic and
trading parameters of the two options
6.73 and Make a Conforming Change open outcry bidding and offering
classes.21 Although the appointment
to Rule 6.47A requirements associated with a Price
costs for SPXPM and SPX are different,
Improving Order or Quote, and make a
the Exchange represents that market
February 17, 2017. conforming change to Rule 6.47A. The
makers should not be adversely
Exchange proposes to eliminate these
impacted by this proposal because all Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
order types in order to streamline its
market-makers currently appointed in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 rules and reduce complexity among its
SPXPM also are appointed in SPX, (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 order type offerings.4
which confers the right to trade SPXW notice is hereby given that, on February
options.22 The Commission believes 10, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ Elimination of Price Improving Orders
that, to the extent the trading parameters or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the and Quotes
of the two classes are substantively Securities and Exchange Commission The Exchange proposes to eliminate,
similar, the Exchange’s proposal to (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule and thus delete from its rules, Price
move SPXPM options into the SPX change as described in Items I, II, and Improving Orders and Quotes, as
options class does not raise novel III below, which Items have been defined in Rule 6.62(s).
issues. prepared by the self-regulatory A Price Improving Order or Price
Finally, SPXPM options currently are organization. The Commission is Improving Quote is an order or quote to
listed on a pilot basis. As part of the publishing this notice to solicit buy or sell an option at a specified price
pilot, the Exchange has been required to comments on the proposed rule change at an increment smaller than the
submit to the Commission quarterly from interested persons. minimum price variation in the
reports and annual reports that analyze security. Price Improving Orders and
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the market impact and trading patterns Quotes may be entered in increments as
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
of third-Friday P.M.-settled S&P 500 small as one cent. Because the Exchange
the Proposed Rule Change
options. The Exchange represents that it has not implemented this functionality,
will continue to provide this data in The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange believes it is appropriate
exactly the same scope and format.23 Rule 6.62 to eliminate Price Improving to delete the functionality from its
The Commission believes that the Orders and Quotes, and amend Rule rules.5
continued pilot and reports will allow 6.73 to eliminate the electronic and To reflect this elimination, the
the Exchange and the Commission to open outcry bidding and offering Exchange proposes to delete all
monitor for and assess any potential requirements associated with a Price references to Price Improving Orders
adverse market impact caused by these Improving Order or Quote, and make a and Quotes in Rule 6.62(s), and to the
P.M.-settled options. conforming change to Rule 6.47A. The electronic and open outcry bidding and
Based on the Exchange’s proposed rule change is available on the offering requirements associated with a
representations discussed above, and for Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, Price Improving Order or Quote in the
the reasons noted above, the at the principal office of the Exchange, second introductory paragraph of Rule
Commission believes that the proposal and at the Commission’s Public 6.73 and Rules 6.73(a), 6.73(b) and
to move SPXPM options into the SPX Reference Room. 6.73(c), and to delete in the
options class is consistent with the Act. Commentary to Rule 6.47A references to
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Rule 6.62(s) and 6.73, as follows: 6
IV. Conclusion Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 4 See e.g., Mary Jo White, Chair, Securities and
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Change Exchange Commission, Speech at the Sandler
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 24, that the O’Neill & Partners, L.P. Global Exchange and
proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2016– Brokerage Conference (June 5, 2014) (available at
In its filing with the Commission, the www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/
091) be, and hereby is, approved. self-regulatory organization included 1370542004312#.U5HI-fmwJiw) (‘‘I am asking the
For the Commission, by the Division of statements concerning the purpose of, exchanges to conduct a comprehensive review of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated and basis for, the proposed rule change their order types and how they operate in practice.
As part of this review, I expect that the exchanges
authority.25 and discussed any comments it received will consider appropriate rule changes to help
Eduardo A. Aleman, on the proposed rule change. The text clarify the nature of their order types and how they
Assistant Secretary. of those statements may be examined at interact with each other, and how they support fair,
orderly, and efficient markets.’’ Id.)
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2017–03573 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am] the places specified in Item IV below. 5 Though originally adopted as a competitive
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
The Exchange has prepared summaries, response to another options market introducing
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, price improving orders, the Exchange never
20 See Notice, supra note 3, at 1386.
of the most significant parts of such implemented this functionality for a variety of
21 See statements. reasons, including technology and because most
id. at 1384–85. options volume was concentrated in Penny Pilot
22 See id. at 1385.
issues where price improving orders would be of
23 See id. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). little or no value.
24 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58079
25 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. (July 2, 2008), 73 FR 39365 (July 9, 2009) (SR–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00152 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_11710/page/1.svg)
![11676 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 36 / Friday, February 24, 2017 / Notices
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., registered under Section 6 of the Act 3 reference to the relevant Exchange Rule.
Washington, DC 20549 on official on February 6, 2017.4 The Exchange The Exchange notes that other
business days between the hours of proposes to establish its Fee Schedule. exchanges have Definitions sections in
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the The Exchange initially filed the their respective fee schedule,5 and the
filing also will be available for proposal on February 3, 2017 (SR– Exchange believes that including a
inspection and copying at the principal PEARL–2017–08). That filing has been Definitions section in the front of the
office of the Exchange. All comments withdrawn and replaced with the Exchange’s Fee Schedule makes the Fee
received will be posted without change; current filing (SR–PEARL–2017–10). Schedule more user-friendly.
the Commission does not edit personal The text of the proposed rule change i. Transaction Rebates/Fees
identifying information from is available on the Exchange’s Web site
submissions. You should submit only at http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule- The proposed Fee Schedule sets forth
information that you wish to make filings/pearl, at MIAX PEARL’s transaction rebates and fees for all
available publicly. All submissions principal office, and at the options traded on the Exchange in
should refer to File Number SR– Commission’s Public Reference Room. amounts that vary depending upon
NYSEArca–2017–16 and should be certain factors, including the type of
submitted on or before March 17, 2017. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s market participant for whom the
Statement of the Purpose of, and transaction is executed (e.g. Market
For the Commission, by the Division of Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Maker or Priority Customer) and the
authority.15 Change amount of volume executed by the
Eduardo A. Aleman, In its filing with the Commission, the Member, as described more fully below.
Assistant Secretary. Exchange included statements Exchange Add/Remove Tiered Rebates/
[FR Doc. 2017–03572 Filed 2–23–17; 8:45 am] concerning the purpose of and basis for Fees
the proposed rule change and discussed
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
any comments it received on the In general, the Exchange proposes that
proposed rule change. The text of these Add/Remove Tiered Rebates/Fees
statements may be examined at the applicable to all market participants
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE will be based upon the total monthly
COMMISSION places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set volume executed by the Member 6 on
[Release No. 34–80061; File No. SR–
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of MIAX PEARL in the relevant origin type
PEARL–2017–10] (not including Excluded Contracts) 7
the most significant aspects of such
statements. expressed as a percentage of total
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX consolidated volume (‘‘TCV’’). TCV,
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s which is defined in the Definitions
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Statement of the Purpose of, and section of the Fee Schedule, means total
Rule Change To Establish the MIAX Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule consolidated volume calculated as the
PEARL Fee Schedule Change total national volume in those classes
February 17, 2017. 1. Purpose listed on MIAX PEARL for the month
Pursuant to the provisions of Section for which the fees apply, excluding
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act The purpose of the proposed rule consolidated volume executed during
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 change is to establish transaction rebates the period time in which the Exchange
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that and fees, regulatory fees, and certain experiences an ‘‘Exchange System
on February 13, 2017, MIAX PEARL, non-transaction fees applicable to Disruption’’ (solely in the option classes
LLC (‘‘MIAX PEARL’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) market participants trading options on of the affected Matching Engine (as
filed with the Securities and Exchange and/or using services provided by the defined below)). The term Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a Exchange. These rebates and fees will System Disruption, which is defined in
proposed rule change as described in apply to all market participants trading the Definitions section of the Fee
Items I, II, and III below, which Items options on and/or using services Schedule, means an outage of a
have been prepared by the Exchange. provided by MIAX PEARL. Matching Engine or collective Matching
The Commission is publishing this Definitions Engines for a period of two consecutive
notice to solicit comments on the hours or more, during trading hours.
The Exchange has included a The term Matching Engine, which is
proposed rule change from interested
Definitions section at the beginning of also defined in the Definitions section of
persons.
the Fee Schedule. The purpose of the the Fee Schedule, is a part of the MIAX
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Definitions section is to streamline the PEARL electronic system that processes
Statement of the Terms of Substance of Fee Schedule by placing many of the options orders and trades on a symbol-
the Proposed Rule Change defined terms used in the Fee Schedule by-symbol basis. Some Matching
The Exchange is filing a proposal to in one location at the beginning of the Engines will process option classes with
establish the MIAX PEARL Fee Fee Schedule. Many of the defined
Schedule (the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’) by terms are also defined in Exchange 5 See Exchange Act Release Nos. 70200 (August
adopting rebates and fees applicable to Rules, particularly in Exchange Rule 14, 2013), 78 FR 51242 (August 20, 2013) (SR–
100. Any defined terms that are also Topaz–2013–10); 76453 (November 17, 2015), 80 FR
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
participants trading options on and/or 72999 (November 23, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–56).
using services provided by MIAX defined or otherwise explained in 6 ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or organization
PEARL. Exchange Rules contain a cross that is registered with the Exchange pursuant to
MIAX PEARL commenced operations Chapter II of the Exchange Rules for purposes of
3 15 U.S.C. 78f. trading on the Exchange as an ‘‘Electronic Exchange
as a national securities exchange 4 See Member’’ or ‘‘Market Maker.’’ Members are deemed
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79543
(December 13, 2016), 81 FR 92901 (December 20, ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See Exchange
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 2016) (File No. 10–227) (order approving Rule 100.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). application of MIAX PEARL, LLC for registration as 7 ‘‘Excluded Contracts’’ means any contracts
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. a national securities exchange). routed to an away market for execution.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_11710/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-02-24 01:17:08
Document Modified: 2017-02-24 01:17:08
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 11674 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR