82 FR 12192 - 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) From the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 39 (March 1, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 39 (March 1, 2017)
| Page Range | 12192-12195 | |
| FR Document | 2017-03961 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 39 (Wednesday, March 1, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 12192-12195] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-03961] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-044] 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) From the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') determines that 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) (``R134a'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (``LTFV''). The final weighted- average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are listed below in the ``Final Determination Margins'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective March 1, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Stolz or Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4474, and (202) 482- 5139, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 7, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Determination of this antidumping duty (``AD'') investigation.\1\ In the Preliminary Determination, we postponed the final determination until no later than 135 days after the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in accordance with section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and invited interested parties to comment on our preliminary findings. A summary of the events that occurred since the Department published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less-Than- Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 69786 (October 7, 2016) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, as later amended by 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People's Republic of China; Amended Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, 81 FR 86699 (December 1, 2016) (collectively, ``Preliminary Determination''). \2\ See Memorandum to Carole Showers, Executive Director, Office of Policy, Policy & Negotiations, (insert Carole's title), ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part,'' dated concurrently with this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Period of Investigation The period of investigation (``POI'') is July 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. This period corresponds to the two most recent fiscal quarters prior to the month of the filing of the petition, which was March, 2016.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1) and the Initiation Notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope Comments In the Initiation Notice, the Department set aside a period of time for parties to address scope issues in case briefs or other written comments on scope issues.\4\ No interested party provided comments on scope issues for the Preliminary Determination; however, certain parties did submit comments on the scope of the investigation in the case and rebuttal briefs. The Department addresses these comments in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, but the scope of this investigation remains unchanged for this final determination.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 1, 1, 1, 2-Tetrafluoroethane from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigation, 81 FR 18830 (April 1, 2016) (``Initiation Notice''). \5\ See the Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the PRC. For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in Appendix I of this notice. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested parties in this investigation that are not related to the scope of this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is incorporated by reference by, and hereby adopted by, this notice.\6\ A list of these issues is attached to this notice at Appendix II. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized [[Page 12193]] Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum is available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, from November 9, 2016, through November 16, 2016, we conducted a verification of the sales and cost responses submitted by Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (``Sanmei''). We issued a verification report on December 19, 2016.\7\ The Department used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records and original source documents provided by respondents.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See the Department's memorandum, ``Verification of the Sales and Factors of Production Questionnaire Responses of Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Investigation of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People's Republic of China,'' dated December 19, 2016 (``Verification Report''). \8\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on the Department's analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to Sanmei's margin calculations. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Combination Rates In the Initiation Notice, the Department stated that it would calculate combination rates for the respondents that are eligible for a separate rate in this investigation.\9\ Policy Bulletin 05.1 describes this practice.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at18834. \10\ See Enforcement and Compliance's Policy Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy Countries,'' dated April 5, 2005 (``Policy Bulletin 05.1''), available on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part In the Preliminary Determination, the Department found that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of R134a from the PRC produced or exported by the PRC-wide entity and non-individually reviewed producers/exporters entitled to a separate rate.\11\ We are not modifying our findings for this final determination. Thus, pursuant to section 735(a)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206(h)(1)-(2), we find that critical circumstances exist with respect to subject merchandise produced or exported by the PRC-wide entity and non- individually reviewed producers/exporters entitled to a separate rate.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See the memorandum, ``Less Than Fair Value Investigation of 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (``R-134a'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''): Critical Circumstances Import Data,'' dated September 29, 2016. \12\ For a full description of the methodology and results of our analysis, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum and see the memorandum, ``Analysis for the Final Determination of the Less-Than- Fair-Value Investigation of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R 134a) from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rate Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the rate for all other companies that have not been individually examined is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely on the basis of facts available. In this final determination, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for Sanmei (the only mandatory respondent eligible for a separate rate) which is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Accordingly, we determine to use Sanmei's weighted-average dumping margin as the margin for the separate rate companies. PRC-Wide Rate In our Preliminary Determination, we found that, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, the PRC-wide entity did not respond to the Department's requests for information, failed to provide necessary information, withheld information requested by the Department, failed to provide information in a timely manner, and significantly impeded this proceeding by not submitting the requested information. As a result, we preliminarily determined to calculate the PRC-wide rate on the basis of adverse facts available (``AFA''). For the final determination, we continue to calculate the PRC-wide rate on the basis of AFA, in accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. We are applying Sanmei's highest calculated transaction-specific dumping rate of 167.02 percent, as AFA, to the PRC-wide entity for this final determination.\13\ The transaction underlying this dumping margin is neither unusual in terms of transaction quantities nor otherwise atypical, and does not reveal any of Sanmei's proprietary data.\14\ There is no need to corroborate the selected margin because it is based on information submitted by Sanmei in the course of this investigation, i.e., it is not secondary information.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See, e.g., Silica Bricks and Shapes from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation and Postponement of Final Determination, 78 FR 37203 (June 20, 2013), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Comment 3. \14\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 52065 (September 12, 2007) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. \15\ See 19 CFR 351.308(c) and (d) and section 776(c) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination The Department determines that the estimated final weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- Exporter Producer average margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Zhejiang Sanmei 148.79 Industry Co., Ltd. Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Sanmei Chemicals Co., Ltd. Jiangsu Bluestar Green Jiangsu Bluestar Green 148.79 Technology Co., Ltd. Technology Co., Ltd. T.T. International Co., Ltd.... Electrochemical Factory 148.79 of Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd. T.T. International Co., Ltd.... Sinochem Environmental 148.79 Protection Chemicals (Taicang) Co., Ltd. T.T. International Co., Ltd.... Zhejiang Quzhou 148.79 Lianzhou Refrigerants Co., Ltd. [[Page 12194]] T.T. International Co., Ltd.... Zhejiang Sanmei 148.79 Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. T.T. International Co., Ltd.... Zhejiang Zhonglan 148.79 Refrigeration Technology Co., Ltd. Weitron International Sinochem Environmental 148.79 Refrigeration Equipment Co., Protection Chemicals Ltd. (Taicang) Co., Ltd. Weitron International Weitron International 148.79 Refrigeration Equipment Co., Refrigeration Ltd. Equipment Co., Ltd. Weitron International Zhejiang Organic Fluor- 148.79 Refrigeration Equipment Co., Chemistry Plant, Ltd. Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd. Weitron International Zhejiang Quhua Fluor- 148.79 Refrigeration Equipment Co., Chemistry Co., Ltd. Ltd. Weitron International Zhejiang Quhua Juxin 148.79 Refrigeration Equipment Co., Fluorochemical Ltd. Industry Co., Ltd. Weitron International Zhejiang Sanmei 148.79 Refrigeration Equipment Co., Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Ltd. PRC-Wide Entity\16\............ ....................... 167.02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We intend to disclose to parties the calculations performed in this proceeding within five days of the public announcement of this final determination in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ The PRC-Wide Entity includes Zhejiang Quzhou Lianzhou Refrigerants Co., Ltd., a mandatory respondent, as well as separate rate applicants Zhejiang Quhua Fluor-Chemistry Co., Ltd., and Sinochem Environmental Protection Chemicals (Taicang) Co. Ltd. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at comment 1 and Preliminary Determination at 17. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to continue to suspend liquidation of all entries of R134a from the PRC, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after July 9, 2016 (for those entities for which we found critical circumstances exist) or on or after October 7, 2016, the date of publication in the Federal Register of the affirmative Preliminary Determination (for all entities for which we did not find critical circumstances exist). Further, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit \17\ equal to the weighted-average amount by which the normal value exceeds U.S. price, as follows: (1) For the exporter/producer combinations listed in the table above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the dumping margin which the Department determined in this final determination; (2) for all combinations of PRC exporters/producers of merchandise under consideration which have not received their own separate rate above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the dumping margin established for the PRC-wide entity; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of merchandise under consideration which have not received their own separate rate above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the cash deposit rate applicable to the PRC exporter/producer combination that supplied that non-PRC exporter. The suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042 (October 3, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the International Trade Commission (``ITC'') of the final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will determine, within 45 days, whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of R134a from the PRC, or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation, of R134a from the PRC. If the ITC determines that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated and all securities posted will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue an AD order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to the parties subject to administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the disposition of propriety information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: February 21, 2017. Carole Showers, Executive Director, Office of Policy, Policy & Negotiations. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The product subject to this investigation is 1,1,1,2- Tetrafluoroethane, R-134a, or its chemical equivalent, regardless of form, type, or purity level. The chemical formula for 1,1,1,2- Tetrafluoroethane is CF3 -CH2 F, and the Chemical Abstracts Service registry number is CAS 811-97-2.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane is sold under a number of trade names including Klea 134a and Zephex 134a (Mexichem Fluor); Genetron 134a (Honeywell); FreonTM 134a, Suva 134a, Dymel 134a, and Dymel P134a (Chemours); Solkane 134a (Solvay); and Forane 134a (Arkema). Generically, 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane has been sold as Fluorocarbon 134a, R-134a, HFC-134a, HF A-134a, Refrigerant 134a, and UN3159. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Merchandise covered by the scope of this investigation is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') at subheading 2903.39.2020. Although the HTSUS subheading and CAS registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part V. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination VI. Use of Adverse Facts Available VII. Discussion of the Issues [[Page 12195]] Comment 1: Whether the Department Correctly Denied Lianzhou and Quhua a Separate Rate Comment 2: Whether the Scope of the Investigation Overlaps With an Existing Order Comment 3: Whether Critical Circumstances Exist for Weitron Comment 4: Sanmei's By-Product Offsets Comment 5: Selection of Inland Boat Freight Surrogate Value Comment 6: Use of the CYDSA Financial Statement in Calculation of Surrogate Financial Ratios Comment 7: Revision of Sanmei's Producer/Exporter Combinations VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-03961 Filed 2-28-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![12192 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 39 / Wednesday, March 1, 2017 / Notices
completed segment for the most recent DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE for this final determination, may be
period for each company; (2) for other found in the accompanying Issues and
producers and exporters covered in a International Trade Administration Decision Memorandum.2
prior segment of the proceeding, the [A–570–044] Period of Investigation
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is
completed segment for the most recent From the People’s Republic of China: July 1, 2015, through December 31,
Final Determination of Sales at Less 2015. This period corresponds to the
period of this proceeding in which that
Than Fair Value and Affirmative two most recent fiscal quarters prior to
producer or exporter participated; (3) if
Determination of Critical the month of the filing of the petition,
the exporter is not a firm covered in this which was March, 2016.3
review, a prior review, or the original Circumstances, in Part
investigation, but the producer is, then AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Scope Comments
the cash deposit rate will be the rate International Trade Administration, In the Initiation Notice, the
established for the completed segment Department of Commerce. Department set aside a period of time
for the most recent period of this SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce for parties to address scope issues in
proceeding for the producer of subject (‘‘Department’’) determines that 1,1,1,2 case briefs or other written comments
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) (‘‘R134a’’) on scope issues.4 No interested party
rate for all other producers or exporters from the People’s Republic of China provided comments on scope issues for
will continue to be 12.45 percent, the (‘‘PRC’’) is being, or is likely to be, sold the Preliminary Determination;
all-others rate established in the in the United States at less than fair however, certain parties did submit
investigation.15 These cash deposit value (‘‘LTFV’’). The final weighted- comments on the scope of the
requirements, when imposed, shall average dumping margins of sales at investigation in the case and rebuttal
remain in effect until further notice. LTFV are listed below in the ‘‘Final briefs. The Department addresses these
Determination Margins’’ section of this comments in the accompanying Issues
Notification to Importers and Decision Memorandum, but the
notice.
scope of this investigation remains
This notice serves as a preliminary DATES: Effective March 1, 2017.
unchanged for this final determination.5
reminder to importers of their FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
responsibility under 19 CFR Stolz or Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Scope of the Investigation
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Operations, Office III, Enforcement and The product covered by this
regarding the reimbursement of Compliance, International Trade investigation is 1,1,1,2
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Administration, U.S. Department of Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) from the
of the relevant entries during this Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue PRC. For a full description of the scope
review period. Failure to comply with NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: of this investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of
this requirement could result in the (202) 482–4474, and (202) 482–5139, the Investigation,’’ in Appendix I of this
Secretary’s presumption that respectively. notice.
reimbursement of antidumping duties SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Analysis of Comments Received
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties. Background All issues raised in the case and
On October 7, 2016, the Department rebuttal briefs by interested parties in
Notification to Interested Parties published the Preliminary this investigation that are not related to
Determination of this antidumping duty the scope of this investigation are
We are issuing and publishing these addressed in the Issues and Decision
preliminary results of administrative (‘‘AD’’) investigation.1 In the
Preliminary Determination, we Memorandum, which is incorporated by
review in accordance with sections reference by, and hereby adopted by,
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. postponed the final determination until
no later than 135 days after the date of this notice.6 A list of these issues is
Dated: February 22, 2017. publication of the Preliminary attached to this notice at Appendix II.
Carole Showers, Determination in accordance with The Issues and Decision Memorandum
section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of is a public document and is on file
Executive Director, Office of Policy, Policy
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) and electronically via Enforcement and
& Negotiations.
invited interested parties to comment on Compliance’s Antidumping and
[FR Doc. 2017–03959 Filed 2–28–17; 8:45 am]
our preliminary findings. A summary of Countervailing Duty Centralized
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
the events that occurred since the 2 See Memorandum to Carole Showers, Executive
Department published the Preliminary Director, Office of Policy, Policy & Negotiations,
Determination, as well as a full (insert Carole’s title), ‘‘Issues and Decision
discussion of the issues raised by parties Memorandum for the 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane
(R–134a) from the People’s Republic of China: Final
1 See 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) from the Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Determination of Critical
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Circumstances, in Part,’’ dated concurrently with
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value and
this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’).
Affirmative Determination of Critical 3 See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1) and the Initiation
Circumstances, in Part, and Postponement of Final
Determination, 81 FR 69786 (October 7, 2016) and Notice.
4 See 1, 1, 1, 2-Tetrafluoroethane from the
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
as later amended by 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less Than
(R–134a) from the People’s Republic of China; Fair Value Investigation, 81 FR 18830 (April 1,
Amended Preliminary Affirmative Determination of 2016) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
15 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 5 See the Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, 81 FR 86699
Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from (December 1, 2016) (collectively, ‘‘Preliminary Comment 2.
India, 59 FR 66915, 66921 (December 28, 1994). Determination’’). 6 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:09 Feb 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_12231/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 39 / Wednesday, March 1, 2017 / Notices 12195
Comment 1: Whether the Department February 21, 2017.2 For a complete Alignment
Correctly Denied Lianzhou and Quhua a description of the events that followed
Separate Rate the initiation of this investigation, see As noted in the Preliminary Decision
Comment 2: Whether the Scope of the
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, in accordance with
Investigation Overlaps With an Existing section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
Order Memorandum.3 A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision 351.210(b)(4), the Department is
Comment 3: Whether Critical aligning the final determination in this
Circumstances Exist for Weitron Memorandum is included as Appendix
Comment 4: Sanmei’s By-Product Offsets II to this notice. The Preliminary countervailing duty (CVD) investigation
Comment 5: Selection of Inland Boat Decision Memorandum is a public with the final determination in the
Freight Surrogate Value document and is on file electronically companion antidumping duty (AD)
Comment 6: Use of the CYDSA Financial via Enforcement and Compliance’s investigation of rebar from Turkey based
Statement in Calculation of Surrogate
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty on a request made by the petitioner.7
Financial Ratios Consequently, the final CVD
Comment 7: Revision of Sanmei’s Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to determination will be issued on the
Producer/Exporter Combinations same date as the final AD
VIII. Recommendation registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all determination, which is currently
[FR Doc. 2017–03961 Filed 2–28–17; 8:45 am] scheduled to be issued no later than
parties in the Central Records Unit,
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
room B8024 of the main Department of May 15, 2017, unless postponed.
Commerce building. In addition, a All-Others Rate
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed Sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of
International Trade Administration directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ the Act provide that, in the preliminary
frn/. The signed and electronic versions determination, the Department shall
[C–489–830] determine an estimated all-others rate
of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content. for companies not individually
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
examined. This rate shall be an amount
the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Scope of the Investigation equal to the weighted average of the
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
The product covered by this estimated subsidy rates established for
Determination and Alignment of Final
investigation is rebar from Turkey. For those companies individually
Countervailing Duty Determination
a complete description of the scope of examined, excluding any zero and de
With Final Antidumping Duty
the investigation, see Appendix I to this minimis rates and any rates based
Determination
notice. entirely on facts otherwise available
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, under section 776 of the Act.
International Trade Administration, Scope Comments
The Department calculated an
Department of Commerce. In accordance with the Preamble to individual estimated countervailable
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce the Department’s regulations,4 the subsidy rate for Habaş Sinai ve Tibbi
(the Department) preliminarily Initiation Notice set aside a period of Gazlar Istihsal Endüstrisi A.Ş. (Habas),
determines that countervailable time for parties to raise issues regarding the only individually examined
subsidies are being provided to product coverage (i.e., scope).5 No exporter/producer in this investigation.
producers and exporters of steel interested party commented on the Because the only individually
concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the scope of the investigation as it appeared calculated rate is not zero, de minimis,
Republic of Turkey (Turkey). The period in the Initiation Notice. or based entirely on facts otherwise
of investigation is January 1, 2015, available, the individual estimated rate
Methodology
through December 31, 2015. calculated for Habas is the rate assigned
DATES: Effective March 1, 2017. The Department is conducting this
to all other producers and exporters,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: investigation in accordance with section
pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the
Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy
Act.
Office VII, Enforcement and programs found countervailable, the
Compliance, International Trade Department preliminarily determines Preliminary Determination
Administration, U.S. Department of that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that The Department preliminarily
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue determines that the following estimated
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.6 countervailable subsidy rates exist:
(202) 482–3857.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the
Company Subsidy rate
Background Republic of Turkey: Postponement of Preliminary
Determination in Countervailing Duty Investigation, Habaş Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar
This preliminary determination is 81 FR 86701 (December 1, 2016). Istihsal Endüstrisi A.Ş. 8 .... 3.47 percent
issued in accordance with section 3 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Decision All-Others .............................. 3.47 percent
703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in
the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Steel
amended (the Act). The Department Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of
The scope of this countervailing duty
published the notice of initiation of this Turkey,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby investigation covers only rebar
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
investigation on October 18, 2016.1 On adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision
7 See Letter from the Rebar Trade Action
December 1, 2016, the Department Memorandum).
4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties: Coalition and its individual members, ‘‘Steel
postponed the preliminary Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Turkey: Request to
determination of this investigation until (Preamble). Align Countervailing Duty Final Determination
5 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 71706. with Antidumping Duty Final Determination,’’
1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the 6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act February 1, 2017.
8 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Countervailing (regarding financial contribution); see also section
Duty Investigation, 81 FR 71705 (October 18, 2016) 771(5)(E) of the Act (regarding benefit); section Memorandum, the Department has found the
(Initiation Notice). 771(5A) of the Act (regarding specificity). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Feb 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_12231/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-03-01 03:39:07
Document Modified: 2017-03-01 03:39:07
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective March 1, 2017. | |
| Contact | Paul Stolz or Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4474, and (202) 482- 5139, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 12192 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR