82 FR 12195 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 39 (March 1, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 39 (March 1, 2017)
| Page Range | 12195-12197 | |
| FR Document | 2017-03958 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 39 (Wednesday, March 1, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 12195-12197] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-03958] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-489-830] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey). The period of investigation is January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. DATES: Effective March 1, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3857. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This preliminary determination is issued in accordance with section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department published the notice of initiation of this investigation on October 18, 2016.\1\ On December 1, 2016, the Department postponed the preliminary determination of this investigation until February 21, 2017.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 81 FR 71705 (October 18, 2016) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in Countervailing Duty Investigation, 81 FR 86701 (December 1, 2016). \3\ See Department Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is rebar from Turkey. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix I to this notice. Scope Comments In accordance with the Preamble to the Department's regulations,\4\ the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).\5\ No interested party commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties: Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble). \5\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 71706. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, the Department preliminarily determines that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act (regarding financial contribution); see also section 771(5)(E) of the Act (regarding benefit); section 771(5A) of the Act (regarding specificity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alignment As noted in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4), the Department is aligning the final determination in this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation with the final determination in the companion antidumping duty (AD) investigation of rebar from Turkey based on a request made by the petitioner.\7\ Consequently, the final CVD determination will be issued on the same date as the final AD determination, which is currently scheduled to be issued no later than May 15, 2017, unless postponed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Letter from the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Turkey: Request to Align Countervailing Duty Final Determination with Antidumping Duty Final Determination,'' February 1, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All-Others Rate Sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that, in the preliminary determination, the Department shall determine an estimated all-others rate for companies not individually examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated subsidy rates established for those companies individually examined, excluding any zero and de minimis rates and any rates based entirely on facts otherwise available under section 776 of the Act. The Department calculated an individual estimated countervailable subsidy rate for Haba[scedil] Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal End[uuml]strisi A.[Scedil]. (Habas), the only individually examined exporter/producer in this investigation. Because the only individually calculated rate is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available, the individual estimated rate calculated for Habas is the rate assigned to all other producers and exporters, pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act. Preliminary Determination The Department preliminarily determines that the following estimated countervailable subsidy rates exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Company Subsidy rate ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Haba[scedil] Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal 3.47 percent End[uuml]strisi A.[Scedil]. \8\........................ All-Others.............................................. 3.47 percent ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The scope of this countervailing duty investigation covers only rebar --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the Department has found the following companies to be cross-owned with Habas: Haba[scedil] Elektrik [Uuml]retim A.[Scedil]., Haba[scedil] End[uuml]stri Tesisleri A.[Scedil]., Haba[scedil] Petrol A.[Scedil]., and Merta[scedil] Turizm Nakliyat ve Ticaret A.[Scedil]. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 12196]] produced and/or exported by companies excluded from the existing 2014 Turkey CVD Order. Currently, only Habas is excluded from the existing order and, therefore, no companies will be subject to the all-others rate indicated above at this time, and cash deposits discussed below will apply solely to rebar produced and/or exported by Habas. Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, the Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise, as described in the ``Scope of the Investigation'' section, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(d), the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the rate indicated above for Haba[scedil]. Disclosure The Department intends to disclose the calculations and analysis performed in this preliminary determination to interested parties within five days of its public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Verification As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act, the Department intends to verify the information relied upon in making its final determination. Public Comment For reasons discussed in the Preliminary Determination Memorandum, the Department invites interested parties to submit monthly natural gas price data to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance via ACCESS for purposes of valuing the provision of natural gas for less than adequate remuneration and/or comment on the natural gas price data that is currently on the record within 10 days of the publication of this notice.\9\ Rebuttal comments may be submitted within five days after the deadline for new monthly price data and initial comments. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Preliminary Determination Memorandum at 11-12. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case briefs or other written comments may also be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance via ACCESS no later than seven days after the date on which the last verification report is issued in this investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline for case briefs.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this investigation are encouraged to submit the following with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, limited to issues raised in case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 703(f) of the Act, the Department will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its determination. If the determination is affirmative, the ITC will make its final determination before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after the final determination. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 703(f) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: February 21, 2017. Carole Showers, Executive Director, Office of Policy, Policy & Negotiations. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise subject to this investigation is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack thereof. Subject merchandise includes deformed steel wire with bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and which has been subjected to an elongation test. The subject merchandise includes rebar that has been further processed in the subject country or a third country, including but not limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the rebar. Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or smooth rebar). Also excluded from the scope is deformed steel wire meeting ASTM A1064/A1064M with no bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and without being subject to an elongation test. At the time of the filing of the petition, there was an existing countervailing duty order on steel reinforcing bar from the Republic of Turkey. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey, 79 FR 65,926 (Dep't Commerce Nov. 6, 2014) (2014 Turkey CVD Order). The scope of this countervailing duty investigation with regard to rebar from Turkey covers only rebar produced and/or exported by those companies that are excluded from the 2014 Turkey CVD Order. At the time of the issuance of the 2014 Turkey CVD Order, Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. was the only excluded Turkish rebar producer or exporter. The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope remains dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Alignment VI. Respondent Selection VII. Injury Test [[Page 12197]] VIII. Subsidies Valuation IX. Analysis of Programs X. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017-03958 Filed 2-28-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 39 / Wednesday, March 1, 2017 / Notices 12195
Comment 1: Whether the Department February 21, 2017.2 For a complete Alignment
Correctly Denied Lianzhou and Quhua a description of the events that followed
Separate Rate the initiation of this investigation, see As noted in the Preliminary Decision
Comment 2: Whether the Scope of the
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, in accordance with
Investigation Overlaps With an Existing section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
Order Memorandum.3 A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision 351.210(b)(4), the Department is
Comment 3: Whether Critical aligning the final determination in this
Circumstances Exist for Weitron Memorandum is included as Appendix
Comment 4: Sanmei’s By-Product Offsets II to this notice. The Preliminary countervailing duty (CVD) investigation
Comment 5: Selection of Inland Boat Decision Memorandum is a public with the final determination in the
Freight Surrogate Value document and is on file electronically companion antidumping duty (AD)
Comment 6: Use of the CYDSA Financial via Enforcement and Compliance’s investigation of rebar from Turkey based
Statement in Calculation of Surrogate
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty on a request made by the petitioner.7
Financial Ratios Consequently, the final CVD
Comment 7: Revision of Sanmei’s Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to determination will be issued on the
Producer/Exporter Combinations same date as the final AD
VIII. Recommendation registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all determination, which is currently
[FR Doc. 2017–03961 Filed 2–28–17; 8:45 am] scheduled to be issued no later than
parties in the Central Records Unit,
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
room B8024 of the main Department of May 15, 2017, unless postponed.
Commerce building. In addition, a All-Others Rate
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed Sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of
International Trade Administration directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ the Act provide that, in the preliminary
frn/. The signed and electronic versions determination, the Department shall
[C–489–830] determine an estimated all-others rate
of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content. for companies not individually
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
examined. This rate shall be an amount
the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Scope of the Investigation equal to the weighted average of the
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
The product covered by this estimated subsidy rates established for
Determination and Alignment of Final
investigation is rebar from Turkey. For those companies individually
Countervailing Duty Determination
a complete description of the scope of examined, excluding any zero and de
With Final Antidumping Duty
the investigation, see Appendix I to this minimis rates and any rates based
Determination
notice. entirely on facts otherwise available
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, under section 776 of the Act.
International Trade Administration, Scope Comments
The Department calculated an
Department of Commerce. In accordance with the Preamble to individual estimated countervailable
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce the Department’s regulations,4 the subsidy rate for Habaş Sinai ve Tibbi
(the Department) preliminarily Initiation Notice set aside a period of Gazlar Istihsal Endüstrisi A.Ş. (Habas),
determines that countervailable time for parties to raise issues regarding the only individually examined
subsidies are being provided to product coverage (i.e., scope).5 No exporter/producer in this investigation.
producers and exporters of steel interested party commented on the Because the only individually
concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the scope of the investigation as it appeared calculated rate is not zero, de minimis,
Republic of Turkey (Turkey). The period in the Initiation Notice. or based entirely on facts otherwise
of investigation is January 1, 2015, available, the individual estimated rate
Methodology
through December 31, 2015. calculated for Habas is the rate assigned
DATES: Effective March 1, 2017. The Department is conducting this
to all other producers and exporters,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: investigation in accordance with section
pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the
Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy
Act.
Office VII, Enforcement and programs found countervailable, the
Compliance, International Trade Department preliminarily determines Preliminary Determination
Administration, U.S. Department of that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that The Department preliminarily
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue determines that the following estimated
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.6 countervailable subsidy rates exist:
(202) 482–3857.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the
Company Subsidy rate
Background Republic of Turkey: Postponement of Preliminary
Determination in Countervailing Duty Investigation, Habaş Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar
This preliminary determination is 81 FR 86701 (December 1, 2016). Istihsal Endüstrisi A.Ş. 8 .... 3.47 percent
issued in accordance with section 3 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Decision All-Others .............................. 3.47 percent
703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in
the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Steel
amended (the Act). The Department Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of
The scope of this countervailing duty
published the notice of initiation of this Turkey,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby investigation covers only rebar
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
investigation on October 18, 2016.1 On adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision
7 See Letter from the Rebar Trade Action
December 1, 2016, the Department Memorandum).
4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties: Coalition and its individual members, ‘‘Steel
postponed the preliminary Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Turkey: Request to
determination of this investigation until (Preamble). Align Countervailing Duty Final Determination
5 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 71706. with Antidumping Duty Final Determination,’’
1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the 6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act February 1, 2017.
8 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Countervailing (regarding financial contribution); see also section
Duty Investigation, 81 FR 71705 (October 18, 2016) 771(5)(E) of the Act (regarding benefit); section Memorandum, the Department has found the
(Initiation Notice). 771(5A) of the Act (regarding specificity). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Feb 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_12234/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 39 / Wednesday, March 1, 2017 / Notices 12197
VIII. Subsidies Valuation Tension Steel.3 On January 9, 2017, responsibility concerning the
IX. Analysis of Programs Tension Steel timely withdrew its disposition of proprietary information
X. Conclusion request for an administrative review.4 disclosed under APO in accordance
[FR Doc. 2017–03958 Filed 2–28–17; 8:45 am] No other party requested an with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P administrative review. written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
Rescission of Review
conversion to judicial protective order is
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the hereby requested. Failure to comply
Department will rescind an with the regulations and the terms of an
International Trade Administration administrative review, ‘‘in whole or in APO is a sanctionable violation.
part, if a party that requested a review We intend to issue and publish this
[A–583–850] withdraws the request within 90 days of notice in accordance with sections
the date of publication of notice of 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods initiation of the requested review.’’ CFR 351.213(d)(4).
From Taiwan: Rescission of Tension Steel withdrew its request for Dated: February 21, 2017.
Antidumping Duty Administrative review within the 90-day time limit.
Review; 2015–2016 Gary Taverman,
Because we received no other requests
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
for an administrative review of Tension Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Steel and no other requests for Operations.
International Trade Administration,
administrative review of the order on
Department of Commerce. [FR Doc. 2017–03960 Filed 2–28–17; 8:45 am]
OCTG from Taiwan with respect to
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
other companies subject to the order, we
(the Department) is rescinding the are rescinding the administrative review
administrative review of the of the order in full, in accordance with
antidumping duty order on certain oil DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
country tubular goods from Taiwan for International Trade Administration
the period September 1, 2015, through Assessment
August 31, 2016. The Department will instruct U.S. [A–351–825]
DATES: Effective March 1, 2017. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil:
assess antidumping duties on all
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
appropriate entries of OCTG from
Michael A. Romani or Minoo Hatten, Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
Taiwan during the POR at rates equal to
AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 2016
the cash deposit rate of estimated
Enforcement and Compliance,
antidumping duties required at the time AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
for consumption, in accordance with 19 Department of Commerce.
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0198 or
intends to issue appropriate assessment (the Department) is conducting an
(202) 482–1690, respectively.
instructions to CBP 15 days after administrative review of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: publication of this notice in the Federal antidumping duty order on stainless
Background Register. steel bar (SSB) from Brazil. The period
Notification to Importers of review (POR) is February 1, 2015,
On September 8, 2016, the
through January 31, 2016. The review
Department published a notice of This notice serves as a final reminder covers one producer/exporter of the
opportunity to request an administrative to importers of their responsibility subject merchandise, Villares Metals
review of the antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a S.A. (Villares). We preliminarily find
on certain oil country tubular goods certificate regarding the reimbursement that subject merchandise has not been
(OCTG) from Taiwan for the period of of antidumping duties prior to sold at less than normal value. We
review (POR) September 1, 2015, liquidation of the relevant entries invite interested parties to comment on
through August 31, 2016.1 during this review period. Failure to these preliminary results.
On September 27, 2016, Tension Steel comply with this requirement could DATES: Effective March 1, 2017.
Industries Co., Ltd. (Tension Steel), result in the Department’s presumption
requested an administrative review of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
that reimbursement of antidumping
the order with respect to its entries of duties occurred and the subsequent Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/
subject merchandise during the POR.2 assessment of doubled antidumping CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
On November 9, 2016, in accordance duties. and Compliance, International Trade
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of Administration, U.S. Department of
1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR Notification Regarding Administrative Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an Protective Order NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
administrative review of the order on This notice also serves as a reminder (202) 482–3477, and (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
OCTG from Taiwan with respect to to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Scope of the Order
to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 62096 Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR The merchandise subject to the order
(September 8, 2016). 78778 (November 9, 2016). is SSB. The SSB subject to the order is
2 See Letter from Tension Steel to the Secretary 4 See Letter from the petitioners to the Secretary
of Commerce entitled, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods entitled, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from Taiwan;
currently classifiable under subheadings
from Taiwan; Administrative Review Request,’’ Withdrawal of Administrative Review Request,’’ 7222.1000, 7222.1100, 7222.1900,
dated September 27, 2016. dated January 9, 2017. 7222.2000, 7222.3000 of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:09 Feb 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_12234/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-03-01 03:39:23
Document Modified: 2017-03-01 03:39:23
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective March 1, 2017. | |
| Contact | Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3857. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 12195 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR