82 FR 13019 - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 44 (March 8, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 44 (March 8, 2017)
| Page Range | 13019-13026 | |
| FR Document | 2017-04502 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 8, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 13019-13026] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-04502] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2017-0047] Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: License amendment request; notice of opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene; order imposing procedures. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received and is considering approval of three amendment requests. The amendment requests are for LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3; and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4. For each amendment request, the NRC proposes to determine that they involve no significant hazards consideration. Because each amendment request contains sensitive unclassified non- safeguards information (SUNSI), an order imposes procedures to obtain access to SUNSI for contention preparation. DATES: Comments must be filed by April 7, 2017. A request for a hearing must be filed by May 8, 2017. Any potential party as defined in Sec. 2.4 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), who believes access to SUNSI is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by March 20, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods (unless this document describes a different method for submitting comments on a specific subject):Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0047. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER [[Page 13020]] INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Burkhardt, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1384, email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0047, facility name, unit number(s), plant docket number, application date, and subject when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods: Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0047. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in this document. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2017-0047, facility name, unit number(s), plant docket number, application date, and subject in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS. II. Background Pursuant to Section 189a.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the NRC is publishing this notice. The Act requires the Commission to publish notice of any amendments issued, or proposed to be issued and grants the Commission the authority to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or combined license, as applicable, upon a determination by the Commission that such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, notwithstanding the pendency before the Commission of a request for a hearing from any person. This notice includes notices of amendments containing SUNSI. III. Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing The Commission has made a proposed determination that the following amendment requests involve no significant hazards consideration. Under the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The basis for this proposed determination for each amendment request is shown below. The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination. Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60- day period provided that its final determination is that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. In addition, the Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30- day comment period if circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility. If the Commission takes action prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish a notice of issuance in the Federal Register. If the Commission makes a final no significant hazards consideration determination, any hearing will take place after issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very infrequently. A. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To Intervene Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any persons (petitioner) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene (petition) with respect to the action. Petitions shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309. The NRC's regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. Alternatively, a copy of the regulations is available at the NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, Room O1-F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. If a petition is filed, the Commission or a presiding officer will rule on the petition and, if appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be issued. As required by 10 CFR 2.309(d) the petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following general requirements for standing: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; (2) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the [[Page 13021]] proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f), the petition must also set forth the specific contentions which the petitioner seeks to have litigated in the proceeding. Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner must provide a brief explanation of the bases for the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references to the specific sources and documents on which the petitioner intends to rely to support its position on the issue. The petition must include sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant or licensee on a material issue of law or fact. Contentions must be limited to matters within the scope of the proceeding. The contention must be one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who fails to satisfy the requirements at 10 CFR 2.309(f) with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party. Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene. Parties have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing with respect to resolution of that party's admitted contentions, including the opportunity to present evidence, consistent with the NRC's regulations, policies, and procedures. Petitions must be filed no later than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice. Petitions and motions for leave to file new or amended contentions that are filed after the deadline will not be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii). The petition must be filed in accordance with the filing instructions in the ``Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)'' section of this document. If a hearing is requested, and the Commission has not made a final determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration, the Commission will make a final determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The final determination will serve to establish when the hearing is held. If the final determination is that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the request for a hearing. Any hearing would take place after issuance of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a significant hazards consideration, then any hearing held would take place before the issuance of the amendment unless the Commission finds an imminent danger to the health or safety of the public, in which case it will issue an appropriate order or rule under 10 CFR part 2. A State, local governmental body, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof, may submit a petition to the Commission to participate as a party under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(1). The petition should state the nature and extent of the petitioner's interest in the proceeding. The petition should be submitted to the Commission by May 8, 2017. The petition must be filed in accordance with the filing instructions in the ``Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)'' section of this document, and should meet the requirements for petitions set forth in this section, except that under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(2) a State, local governmental body, or Federally recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof does not need to address the standing requirements in 10 CFR 2.309(d) if the facility is located within its boundaries. Alternatively, a State, local governmental body, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof may participate as a non-party under 10 CFR 2.315(c). If a hearing is granted, any person who is not a party to the proceeding and is not affiliated with or represented by a party may, at the discretion of the presiding officer, be permitted to make a limited appearance pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.315(a). A person making a limited appearance may make an oral or written statement of his or her position on the issues but may not otherwise participate in the proceeding. A limited appearance may be made at any session of the hearing or at any prehearing conference, subject to the limits and conditions as may be imposed by the presiding officer. Details regarding the opportunity to make a limited appearance will be provided by the presiding officer if such sessions are scheduled. B. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a request for hearing and petition for leave to intervene (petition), any motion or other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by interested governmental entities that request to participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in accordance with the NRC's E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 46562; August 3, 2012). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the Internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions may be found in the Guidance for Electronic Submissions to the NRC and on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in accordance with the procedures described below. To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to (1) request a digital identification (ID) certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign submissions and access the E-Filing system for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition or other adjudicatory document (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC- issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic docket. Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then submit adjudicatory documents. Submissions must be in Portable Document Format (PDF). Additional guidance on PDF submissions is available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the document is submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 [[Page 13022]] p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the document on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before adjudicatory documents are filed so that they can obtain access to the documents via the E-Filing system. A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E- Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC's Electronic Filing Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email to [email protected], or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672- 7640. The NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing adjudicatory documents in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at https://adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission or the presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC-issued digital ID certificate as described above, click cancel when the link requests certificates and you will be automatically directed to the NRC's electronic hearing dockets where you will be able to access any publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket. Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or personal phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of such information. For example, in some instances, individuals provide home addresses in order to demonstrate proximity to a facility or site. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted materials in their submission. Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, LaSalle County Station (LSCS), Units 1 and 2, LaSalle County, Illinois Date of amendment request: October 27, 2016. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16305A291. Description of amendment request: This amendment request contains sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI). The proposed changes revise the suppression pool swell design analysis. The new analysis utilizes a different computer code and incorporates different analysis assumptions than the current analysis. The changes are necessary because the current design analysis determining the suppression pool swell response to a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) was determined to be non-conservative. These changes to the suppression pool swell design analysis do not require any changes to the LSCS Technical Specifications. Changes to the LSCS' updated final safety analysis report related to changes to the suppression pool swell design analysis will be made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e). Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below: 1. Do the proposed changes involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed changes involve the reanalysis of the suppression pool swell phenomenon that results from the postulated DBA [design- basis accident] LOCA. The proposed changes resolve a non-conforming condition involving historical design analyses performed to demonstrate the adequacy of items subject to loads resulting from the suppression pool swell phenomena. The proposed changes do not affect plant operations or any design function. The probability of the DBA LOCA or any other accident occurring is not altered as the pool swell phenomenon occurs after a design basis accident or transient and therefore does not impact any accident initiators. The changes revising the suppression pool swell design analysis will not affect radiological dose consequence analyses. The consequences of accidents previously evaluated will not be increased by the proposed changes. The consequences of the pool swell event remain within acceptable margins. Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. 2. Do the proposed changes create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated because they do not involve the addition of any new components or systems. The proposed changes do not alter the design function of components or systems that could initiate a new or different kind of accident. The proposed changes do not alter how components or systems are controlled or utilized. The suppression pool swell phenomenon is one transient that results from the postulated LOCA event, which has previously been evaluated. The impact upon analyses is limited to those associated with the pool swell phenomena. Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. 3. Do the proposed changes involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? Response: No. The changes revising the suppression pool swell design analysis do not represent a significant change in a margin of safety. Following main vent clearing, an air/steam bubble forms at the vent exit. This causes a hydrostatic pressure increase in the pool water resulting in a loading condition on the pool boundaries. The steam condenses in the pool. However, the continued addition and expansion of the drywell air causes the pool [[Page 13023]] volume to swell, resulting in the rise of the pool surface and associated drag and impact loads on surrounding structures. The proposed changes to the suppression pool swell design analysis do not alter any design basis or safety limit established in the license. The proposed changes to the suppression pool swell design analysis were evaluated to the NRC acceptance criteria, and the changes comply with established criteria and do not significantly reduce a margin of safety. Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the requested amendments involve no significant hazards consideration. Attorney for licensee: Tamra Domeyer, Associate General Counsel, Exelon Generation Company, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, Illinois 60555. NRC Branch Chief: David J. Wrona. South Carolina Electric & Gas Company and South Carolina Public Service Authority, Docket Nos. 52-027 and 52-028, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3, Fairfield County, South Carolina Date of amendment request: November 21, 2016. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16326A394. Description of amendment request: This amendment request contains sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI). The amendment request proposes changes to plant-specific Tier 1 information and corresponding changes to Combined License (COL) Appendix C, plant- specific Design Control Document (DCD) Tier 2* and associated Tier 2 material incorporated into the updated final safety analysis report, by revising the design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets and removing tie rods. An exemption request relating to the proposed changes to the AP1000 DCD Tier 1 is included with the request. Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below: 1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The design functions of the nuclear island structures are to provide support, protection, and separation for the seismic Category I mechanical and electrical equipment located in the nuclear island. The nuclear island structures are structurally designed to meet seismic Category I requirements as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.29. The change of the design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets and removal of the tie rods do not have an adverse impact on the response of the nuclear island structures to safely shutdown earthquake ground motions or loads due to anticipated transients or postulated accident conditions. The changes do not impact the support, design, or operation of mechanical and fluid systems. There is no change to plant systems or the response of systems to postulated accident conditions. There is no change to the predicted radioactive releases due to normal operation or postulated accident conditions. The plant response to previously evaluated accidents or external events is not adversely affected, nor does the change described create any new accident precursors. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated. 2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed change is to revise design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets and remove tie rods. The clarification and changes to the design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets do not change the design requirements of the nuclear island structures. The changes do not change the design function, support, design, or operation of mechanical and fluid systems. The changes do not result in a new failure mechanism for the nuclear island structures or new accident precursors. As a result, the design function of the nuclear island structures is not adversely affected by the proposed change. Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different type of accident from any accident previously evaluated. 3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? Response: No. No safety analysis or design basis acceptance limit/criterion is challenged or exceeded by the proposed changes, thus, no margin of safety is reduced. The acceptance limits for the design of seismic Category I structures are included in the codes and standards used for the design, analysis, and construction of the structures. The two primary codes for the seismic Category I structures are American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) N690 and American Concrete Institute (ACI) 349. The design of the shield building roof with the changes to the reinforcement and roof beams satisfies applicable provisions of AISC N690 and ACI 349. The welding of the plate girders used for roof beams meets the requirements of AISC N690 and [American Welding Society (AWS)] D1.1. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Attorney for licensee: Kathryn M. Sutton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLC, 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004-2514. NRC Branch Chief: Jennifer Dixon-Herrity. Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52- 026, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, Burke County, Georgia Date of amendment request: November 30, 2016. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16335A453. Description of amendment request: This amendment request contains sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI). The amendment request proposes changes to plant-specific Tier 1 information and corresponding changes to Combined License (COL) Appendix C, plant- specific Design Control Document (DCD) Tier 2* and associated Tier 2 material incorporated into the updated final safety analysis report, by revising the design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets and removing tie rods. An exemption request relating to the proposed changes to the AP1000 DCD Tier 1 is included with the request. Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below: 1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The design functions of the nuclear island structures are to provide support, protection, and separation for the seismic Category I mechanical and electrical equipment located in the nuclear island. The nuclear island structures are structurally designed to meet seismic Category I requirements as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.29. The change of the design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets and removal of the tie rods do not have an adverse impact on the response of the nuclear island structures to safely shutdown earthquake ground motions or loads due to anticipated transients or [[Page 13024]] postulated accident conditions. The changes do not impact the support, design, or operation of mechanical and fluid systems. There is no change to plant systems or the response of systems to postulated accident conditions. There is no change to the predicted radioactive releases due to normal operation or postulated accident conditions. The plant response to previously evaluated accidents or external events is not adversely affected, nor does the change described create any new accident precursors. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated. 2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed change is to revise design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets and remove tie rods. The clarification and changes to the design details for the shield building roof, tension ring, and air inlets do not change the design requirements of the nuclear island structures. The changes do not change the design function, support, design, or operation of mechanical and fluid systems. The changes do not result in a new failure mechanism for the nuclear island structures or new accident precursors. As a result, the design function of the nuclear island structures is not adversely affected by the proposed change. Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different type of accident from any accident previously evaluated. 3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? Response: No. No safety analysis or design basis acceptance limit/criterion is challenged or exceeded by the proposed changes, thus, no margin of safety is reduced. The acceptance limits for the design of seismic Category I structures are included in the codes and standards used for the design, analysis, and construction of the structures. The two primary codes for the seismic Category I structures are American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) N690 and American Concrete Institute (ACI) 349. The design of the shield building roof with the changes to the reinforcement and roof beams satisfies applicable provisions of AISC N690 and ACI 349. The welding of the plate girders used for roof beams meets the requirements of AISC N690 and [American Welding Society (AWS)] D1.1. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Attorney for licensee: M. Stanford Blanton, Balch & Bingham LLP, 1710 Sixth Avenue North, Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2015. NRC Branch Chief: Jennifer Dixon-Herrity. Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non- Safeguards Information for Contention Preparation Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, LaSalle County, Illinois South Carolina Electric & Gas Company and South Carolina Public Service Authority, Docket Nos. 52-027 and 52-028, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3, Fairfield County, South Carolina Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52- 026, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, Burke County, Georgia A. This Order contains instructions regarding how potential parties to this proceeding may request access to documents containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI). B. Within 10 days after publication of this notice of hearing and opportunity to petition for leave to intervene, any potential party who believes access to SUNSI is necessary to respond to this notice may request access to SUNSI. A ``potential party'' is any person who intends to participate as a party by demonstrating standing and filing an admissible contention under 10 CFR 2.309. Requests for access to SUNSI submitted later than 10 days after publication of this notice will not be considered absent a showing of good cause for the late filing, addressing why the request could not have been filed earlier. C. The requester shall submit a letter requesting permission to access SUNSI to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, and provide a copy to the Associate General Counsel for Hearings, Enforcement and Administration, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The expedited delivery or courier mail address for both offices is: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The email address for the Office of the Secretary and the Office of the General Counsel are [email protected] and [email protected], respectively.\1\ The request must include the following information: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ While a request for hearing or petition to intervene in this proceeding must comply with the filing requirements of the NRC's ``E-Filing Rule,'' the initial request to access SUNSI under these procedures should be submitted as described in this paragraph. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) A description of the licensing action with a citation to this Federal Register notice; (2) The name and address of the potential party and a description of the potential party's particularized interest that could be harmed by the action identified in C.(1); and (3) The identity of the individual or entity requesting access to SUNSI and the requester's basis for the need for the information in order to meaningfully participate in this adjudicatory proceeding. In particular, the request must explain why publicly available versions of the information requested would not be sufficient to provide the basis and specificity for a proffered contention. D. Based on an evaluation of the information submitted under paragraph C.(3) the NRC staff will determine within 10 days of receipt of the request whether: (1) There is a reasonable basis to believe the petitioner is likely to establish standing to participate in this NRC proceeding; and (2) The requestor has established a legitimate need for access to SUNSI. E. If the NRC staff determines that the requestor satisfies both D.(1) and D.(2) above, the NRC staff will notify the requestor in writing that access to SUNSI has been granted. The written notification will contain instructions on how the requestor may obtain copies of the requested documents, and any other conditions that may apply to access to those documents. These conditions may include, but are not limited to, the signing of a Non-Disclosure Agreement or Affidavit, or Protective Order \2\ setting forth terms and conditions to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of SUNSI by each individual who will be granted access to SUNSI. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Any motion for Protective Order or draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit or Agreement for SUNSI must be filed with the presiding officer or the Chief Administrative Judge if the presiding officer has not yet been designated, within 30 days of the deadline for the receipt of the written access request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- F. Filing of Contentions. Any contentions in these proceedings that are based upon the information received as a result of the request made for SUNSI must be filed by the requestor no later than 25 days after receipt of (or access to) that information. However, if more than 25 days remain between the [[Page 13025]] petitioner's receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline. G. Review of Denials of Access. (1) If the request for access to SUNSI is denied by the NRC staff after a determination on standing and requisite need, the NRC staff shall immediately notify the requestor in writing, briefly stating the reason or reasons for the denial. (2) The requester may challenge the NRC staff's adverse determination by filing a challenge within 5 days of receipt of that determination with: (a) The presiding officer designated in this proceeding; (b) if no presiding officer has been appointed, the Chief Administrative Judge, or if he or she is unavailable, another administrative judge, or an Administrative Law Judge with jurisdiction pursuant to 10 CFR 2.318(a); or (c) if another officer has been designated to rule on information access issues, with that officer. (3) Further appeals of decisions under this paragraph must be made pursuant to 10 CFR 2.311. H. Review of Grants of Access. A party other than the requester may challenge an NRC staff determination granting access to SUNSI whose release would harm that party's interest independent of the proceeding. Such a challenge must be filed within 5 days of the notification by the NRC staff of its grant of access and must be filed with: (a) The presiding officer designated in this proceeding; (b) if no presiding officer has been appointed, the Chief Administrative Judge, or if he or she is unavailable, another administrative judge, or an Administrative Law Judge with jurisdiction pursuant to 10 CFR 2.318(a); or (c) if another officer has been designated to rule on information access issues, with that officer. If challenges to the NRC staff determinations are filed, these procedures give way to the normal process for litigating disputes concerning access to information. The availability of interlocutory review by the Commission of orders ruling on such NRC staff determinations (whether granting or denying access) is governed by 10 CFR 2.311.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Requesters should note that the filing requirements of the NRC's E-Filing Rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 46562; August 3, 2012) apply to appeals of NRC staff determinations (because they must be served on a presiding officer or the Commission, as applicable), but not to the initial SUNSI request submitted to the NRC staff under these procedures. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. The Commission expects that the NRC staff and presiding officers (and any other reviewing officers) will consider and resolve requests for access to SUNSI, and motions for protective orders, in a timely fashion in order to minimize any unnecessary delays in identifying those petitioners who have standing and who have propounded contentions meeting the specificity and basis requirements in 10 CFR part 2. The attachment to this Order summarizes the general target schedule for processing and resolving requests under these procedures. It is so ordered. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd of March 2017. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. Attachment 1--General Target Schedule for Processing and Resolving Requests for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information in this Proceeding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Day Event/activity ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0...................... Publication of Federal Register notice of hearing and opportunity to petition for leave to intervene, including order with instructions for access requests. 10..................... Deadline for submitting requests for access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) with information: Supporting the standing of a potential party identified by name and address; describing the need for the information in order for the potential party to participate meaningfully in an adjudicatory proceeding. 60..................... Deadline for submitting petition for intervention containing: (i) Demonstration of standing; and (ii) all contentions whose formulation does not require access to SUNSI (+25 Answers to petition for intervention; +7 petitioner/requestor reply). 20..................... U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff informs the requester of the staff's determination whether the request for access provides a reasonable basis to believe standing can be established and shows need for SUNSI. (NRC staff also informs any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information.) If NRC staff makes the finding of need for SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins document processing (preparation of redactions or review of redacted documents). 25..................... If NRC staff finds no ``need'' or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for petitioner/ requester to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff's denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief Administrative Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ``need'' for SUNSI, the deadline for any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff's grant of access. 30..................... Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s). 40..................... (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and file motion for Protective Order and draft Non- Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/ licensee to file Non-Disclosure Agreement for SUNSI. A...................... If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access to sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse determination by the NRC staff. A + 3.................. Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective order. A + 28................. Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days remain between the petitioner's receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in the notice of opportunity to request a hearing and petition for leave to intervene), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline. A + 53................. (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. A + 60................. (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. >A + 60................ Decision on contention admission. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 13026]] [FR Doc. 2017-04502 Filed 3-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices 13019
in the Federal Register on September the proposed direct license transfer is Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
15, 2016 (81 FR 63500). The NRC approved, subject to the following Regulation.
received 22 comments and no hearing condition: [FR Doc. 2017–04537 Filed 3–7–17; 8:45 am]
requests. All comments were in support Prior to the completion of the license BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
of the proposed action. transfer, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Under 10 CFR 50.80, no license, or shall provide satisfactory documentary
any right thereunder, shall be evidence to the Director of the Office of NUCLEAR REGULATORY
transferred, directly or indirectly, Nuclear Reactor Regulation that it has COMMISSION
through transfer of control of the obtained the appropriate amount of
insurance required of a licensee under 10 [NRC–2017–0047]
license, unless the NRC shall give its
consent in writing. Upon review of the CFR part 140 and 10 CFR part 50.
Applications and Amendments to
information in the application, and It is further ordered that, consistent Facility Operating Licenses and
other information before the NRC, and with 10 CFR 2.1315(b), the license Combined Licenses Involving
relying upon the representations and amendment that makes changes, as Proposed No Significant Hazards
agreements contained in the indicated in Enclosure 2 to the cover Considerations and Containing
application, the NRC staff has letter forwarding this Order, to conform Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards
determined that Exelon is qualified to the license to reflect the subject direct Information and Order Imposing
hold the FitzPatrick renewed facility license transfer is approved. The Procedures for Access to Sensitive
operating license and the FitzPatrick amendment shall be issued and made Unclassified Non-Safeguards
ISFSI general license. The NRC staff has effective at the time the proposed direct Information
also determined that the transfer of license transfer is completed.
these licenses is otherwise consistent It is further ordered that, after receipt AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
with the applicable provisions of law, of all required regulatory approvals of Commission.
regulations, and orders issued by the the proposed direct license transfer, ACTION: License amendment request;
NRC, pursuant thereto, subject to the Exelon shall inform the Director of the notice of opportunity to comment,
condition set forth below. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation in request a hearing, and petition for leave
Upon review of the application for a writing of such receipt, and of the date to intervene; order imposing
conforming license amendment to of closing of the transfer, no later than procedures.
reflect this transfer, the NRC staff has 2 business days prior to the date of the
determined that the application for the closing of the direct license transfer. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
conforming license amendment Should the proposed direct license Commission (NRC) received and is
complies with the standards and transfer not be completed within 1 year considering approval of three
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of this Order’s date of issuance, this amendment requests. The amendment
of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Order shall become null and void, requests are for LaSalle County Station,
Commission’s rules and regulations set provided, however, upon written Units 1 and 2; Virgil C. Summer Nuclear
forth in 10 CFR chapter I; the facility application and for good cause shown, Station, Units 2 and 3; and Vogtle
will operate in conformity with the such date may be extended by order. Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4.
application, the provisions of the Act, This Order is effective upon issuance. For each amendment request, the NRC
and the rules and regulations of the For further details with respect to this proposes to determine that they involve
Commission; there is reasonable Order, see the application dated August no significant hazards consideration.
assurance that the activities authorized 18, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. Because each amendment request
by this amendment can be conducted ML16235A081), as supplemented by contains sensitive unclassified non-
without endangering the health and letter dated November 29, 2016 safeguards information (SUNSI), an
safety of the public and that such (ADAMS Accession No. ML16335A104), order imposes procedures to obtain
activities will be conducted in and the NRC’s nonproprietary Safety access to SUNSI for contention
compliance with the Commission’s Evaluation dated March 1, 2017 preparation.
regulations; the issuance of this (ADAMS Accession No. ML17041A196), DATES: Comments must be filed by April
amendment will not be inimical to the which are available for public 7, 2017. A request for a hearing must be
common defense and security or to the inspection at the Commission’s Public filed by May 8, 2017. Any potential
health and safety of the public; and the Document Room (PDR), located at One party as defined in § 2.4 of title 10 of the
issuance of this amendment will be in White Flint North, Public File Area O1 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
accordance with 10 CFR part 51 of the F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), who believes access to SUNSI is
Commission’s regulations and all Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available necessary to respond to this notice must
applicable requirements will have been documents created or received at the request document access by March 20,
satisfied. NRC are accessible electronically
The findings set forth above are 2017.
through ADAMS in the NRC Library at ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
supported by an NRC safety evaluation http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
dated March 1, 2017, and available by any of the following methods (unless
adams.html. Persons who do not have this document describes a different
under Agencywide Documents Access access to ADAMS, or who encounter
and Management System (ADAMS) method for submitting comments on a
problems in accessing the documents specific subject):
Accession No. ML17041A196. located in ADAMS, should contact the • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
III. NRC PDR reference staff by telephone at http://www.regulations.gov and search
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or for Docket ID NRC–2017–0047. Address
161b, 161i, and 184 of the Atomic by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
Act), 42 USC §§ 2201(b), 2201(i), and of March 2017. email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
2234; and 10 CFR 50.80, it is hereby For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. technical questions, contact the
ordered that the application regarding William M. Dean, individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM 08MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_13063/page/1.svg)
![13022 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices
p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. reason for granting the exemption from issue of no significant hazards
Upon receipt of a transmission, the use of E-Filing no longer exists. consideration, which is presented
E-Filing system time-stamps the Documents submitted in adjudicatory below:
document and sends the submitter an proceedings will appear in the NRC’s 1. Do the proposed changes involve a
email notice confirming receipt of the electronic hearing docket which is significant increase in the probability or
document. The E-Filing system also available to the public at https:// consequences of an accident previously
distributes an email notice that provides adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded evaluated?
access to the document to the NRC’s pursuant to an order of the Commission Response: No.
Office of the General Counsel and any or the presiding officer. If you do not The proposed changes involve the
others who have advised the Office of have an NRC-issued digital ID certificate reanalysis of the suppression pool swell
the Secretary that they wish to as described above, click cancel when phenomenon that results from the postulated
participate in the proceeding, so that the the link requests certificates and you DBA [design-basis accident] LOCA. The
proposed changes resolve a non-conforming
filer need not serve the document on will be automatically directed to the
condition involving historical design
those participants separately. Therefore, NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where analyses performed to demonstrate the
applicants and other participants (or you will be able to access any publicly adequacy of items subject to loads resulting
their counsel or representative) must available documents in a particular from the suppression pool swell phenomena.
apply for and receive a digital ID hearing docket. Participants are The proposed changes do not affect plant
certificate before adjudicatory requested not to include personal operations or any design function. The
documents are filed so that they can privacy information, such as social probability of the DBA LOCA or any other
obtain access to the documents via the security numbers, home addresses, or accident occurring is not altered as the pool
E-Filing system. personal phone numbers in their filings, swell phenomenon occurs after a design basis
A person filing electronically using unless an NRC regulation or other law accident or transient and therefore does not
impact any accident initiators.
the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system requires submission of such
The changes revising the suppression pool
may seek assistance by contacting the information. For example, in some swell design analysis will not affect
NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk instances, individuals provide home radiological dose consequence analyses. The
through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located addresses in order to demonstrate consequences of accidents previously
on the NRC’s public Web site at http:// proximity to a facility or site. With evaluated will not be increased by the
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e- respect to copyrighted works, except for proposed changes. The consequences of the
submittals.html, by email to limited excerpts that serve the purpose pool swell event remain within acceptable
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll- of the adjudicatory filings and would margins.
free call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC constitute a Fair Use application, Therefore, the proposed changes do not
Electronic Filing Help Desk is available participants are requested not to include involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an accident
between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern copyrighted materials in their
previously evaluated.
Time, Monday through Friday, submission. 2. Do the proposed changes create the
excluding government holidays. possibility of a new or different kind of
Participants who believe that they Exelon Generation Company, LLC,
Docket Nos. 50–373 and 50–374, LaSalle accident from any accident previously
have a good cause for not submitting evaluated?
documents electronically must file an County Station (LSCS), Units 1 and 2,
Response: No.
exemption request, in accordance with LaSalle County, Illinois
The proposed changes do not create the
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper Date of amendment request: October possibility of a new or different kind of
filing stating why there is good cause for 27, 2016. A publicly-available version is accident from any accident previously
not filing electronically and requesting in ADAMS under Accession No. evaluated because they do not involve the
authorization to continue to submit ML16305A291. addition of any new components or systems.
Description of amendment request: The proposed changes do not alter the design
documents in paper format. Such filings
This amendment request contains function of components or systems that could
must be submitted by: (1) First class initiate a new or different kind of accident.
mail addressed to the Office of the sensitive unclassified non-safeguards The proposed changes do not alter how
Secretary of the Commission, U.S. information (SUNSI). The proposed components or systems are controlled or
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, changes revise the suppression pool utilized.
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention: swell design analysis. The new analysis The suppression pool swell phenomenon
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or utilizes a different computer code and is one transient that results from the
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited incorporates different analysis postulated LOCA event, which has
delivery service to the Office of the assumptions than the current analysis. previously been evaluated. The impact upon
Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, The changes are necessary because the analyses is limited to those associated with
current design analysis determining the the pool swell phenomena.
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Therefore, the proposed changes do not
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. suppression pool swell response to a create the possibility of a new or different
Participants filing adjudicatory loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) was kind of accident from any previously
documents in this manner are determined to be non-conservative. evaluated.
responsible for serving the document on These changes to the suppression pool 3. Do the proposed changes involve a
all other participants. Filing is swell design analysis do not require any significant reduction in a margin of safety?
considered complete by first-class mail changes to the LSCS Technical Response: No.
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or Specifications. Changes to the LSCS’ The changes revising the suppression pool
by courier, express mail, or expedited updated final safety analysis report swell design analysis do not represent a
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
delivery service upon depositing the related to changes to the suppression significant change in a margin of safety.
Following main vent clearing, an air/steam
document with the provider of the pool swell design analysis will be made bubble forms at the vent exit. This causes a
service. A presiding officer, having in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e). hydrostatic pressure increase in the pool
granted an exemption request from Basis for proposed no significant water resulting in a loading condition on the
using E-Filing, may require a participant hazards consideration determination: pool boundaries. The steam condenses in the
or party to use E-Filing if the presiding As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the pool. However, the continued addition and
officer subsequently determines that the licensee has provided its analysis of the expansion of the drywell air causes the pool
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM 08MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_13063/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices 13023
volume to swell, resulting in the rise of the and separation for the seismic Category I Therefore, the proposed amendment does
pool surface and associated drag and impact mechanical and electrical equipment located not involve a significant reduction in a
loads on surrounding structures. in the nuclear island. The nuclear island margin of safety.
The proposed changes to the suppression structures are structurally designed to meet
pool swell design analysis do not alter any The NRC staff has reviewed the
seismic Category I requirements as defined in
design basis or safety limit established in the Regulatory Guide 1.29. licensee’s analysis and, based on this
license. The proposed changes to the The change of the design details for the review, it appears that the three
suppression pool swell design analysis were shield building roof, tension ring, and air standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
evaluated to the NRC acceptance criteria, and inlets and removal of the tie rods do not have satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff
the changes comply with established criteria an adverse impact on the response of the proposes to determine that the
and do not significantly reduce a margin of nuclear island structures to safely shutdown amendment request involves no
safety. earthquake ground motions or loads due to
Therefore, the proposed changes do not
significant hazards consideration.
anticipated transients or postulated accident Attorney for licensee: Kathryn M.
involve a significant reduction in a margin of conditions. The changes do not impact the
safety. Sutton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLC,
support, design, or operation of mechanical 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
The NRC staff has reviewed the and fluid systems. There is no change to
Washington, DC 20004–2514.
licensee’s analysis and, based on this plant systems or the response of systems to
postulated accident conditions. There is no
NRC Branch Chief: Jennifer Dixon-
review, it appears that the three Herrity.
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are change to the predicted radioactive releases
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff due to normal operation or postulated Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
proposes to determine that the accident conditions. The plant response to Inc., Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026,
previously evaluated accidents or external
requested amendments involve no Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3
events is not adversely affected, nor does the
significant hazards consideration. change described create any new accident and 4, Burke County, Georgia
Attorney for licensee: Tamra Domeyer, precursors. Date of amendment request:
Associate General Counsel, Exelon Therefore, the proposed amendment does November 30, 2016. A publicly-
Generation Company, 4300 Winfield not involve a significant increase in the available version is in ADAMS under
Road, Warrenville, Illinois 60555. consequences of an accident previously Accession No. ML16335A453.
NRC Branch Chief: David J. Wrona. evaluated. Description of amendment request:
2. Does the proposed amendment create
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company the possibility of a new or different kind of
This amendment request contains
and South Carolina Public Service accident from any accident previously sensitive unclassified non-safeguards
Authority, Docket Nos. 52–027 and 52– evaluated? information (SUNSI). The amendment
028, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Response: No. request proposes changes to plant-
Units 2 and 3, Fairfield County, South The proposed change is to revise design specific Tier 1 information and
Carolina details for the shield building roof, tension corresponding changes to Combined
Date of amendment request: ring, and air inlets and remove tie rods. The License (COL) Appendix C, plant-
clarification and changes to the design details specific Design Control Document
November 21, 2016. A publicly- for the shield building roof, tension ring, and
available version is in ADAMS under (DCD) Tier 2* and associated Tier 2
air inlets do not change the design material incorporated into the updated
Accession No. ML16326A394. requirements of the nuclear island structures.
Description of amendment request: The changes do not change the design
final safety analysis report, by revising
This amendment request contains function, support, design, or operation of the design details for the shield building
sensitive unclassified non-safeguards mechanical and fluid systems. The changes roof, tension ring, and air inlets and
information (SUNSI). The amendment do not result in a new failure mechanism for removing tie rods. An exemption
request proposes changes to plant- the nuclear island structures or new accident request relating to the proposed changes
specific Tier 1 information and precursors. As a result, the design function to the AP1000 DCD Tier 1 is included
corresponding changes to Combined of the nuclear island structures is not with the request.
License (COL) Appendix C, plant- adversely affected by the proposed change. Basis for proposed no significant
specific Design Control Document Therefore, the proposed changes do not hazards consideration determination:
create the possibility of a new or different As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the
(DCD) Tier 2* and associated Tier 2
type of accident from any accident
material incorporated into the updated licensee has provided its analysis of the
previously evaluated.
final safety analysis report, by revising 3. Does the proposed amendment involve
issue of no significant hazards
the design details for the shield building a significant reduction in a margin of safety? consideration, which is presented
roof, tension ring, and air inlets and Response: No. below:
removing tie rods. An exemption No safety analysis or design basis 1. Does the proposed amendment involve
request relating to the proposed changes acceptance limit/criterion is challenged or a significant increase in the probability or
to the AP1000 DCD Tier 1 is included exceeded by the proposed changes, thus, no consequences of an accident previously
with the request. margin of safety is reduced. The acceptance evaluated?
Basis for proposed no significant limits for the design of seismic Category I Response: No.
hazards consideration determination: structures are included in the codes and The design functions of the nuclear island
As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the standards used for the design, analysis, and structures are to provide support, protection,
construction of the structures. The two and separation for the seismic Category I
licensee has provided its analysis of the
primary codes for the seismic Category I mechanical and electrical equipment located
issue of no significant hazards structures are American Institute of Steel in the nuclear island. The nuclear island
consideration, which is presented Construction (AISC) N690 and American structures are structurally designed to meet
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
below: Concrete Institute (ACI) 349. The design of seismic Category I requirements as defined in
1. Does the proposed amendment involve the shield building roof with the changes to Regulatory Guide 1.29. The change of the
a significant increase in the probability or the reinforcement and roof beams satisfies design details for the shield building roof,
consequences of an accident previously applicable provisions of AISC N690 and ACI tension ring, and air inlets and removal of the
evaluated? 349. The welding of the plate girders used for tie rods do not have an adverse impact on the
Response: No. roof beams meets the requirements of AISC response of the nuclear island structures to
The design functions of the nuclear island N690 and [American Welding Society safely shutdown earthquake ground motions
structures are to provide support, protection, (AWS)] D1.1. or loads due to anticipated transients or
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM 08MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_13063/page/5.svg)
![13024 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices
postulated accident conditions. The changes Sixth Avenue North, Birmingham, OGCmailcenter@nrc.gov, respectively.1
do not impact the support, design, or Alabama 35203–2015. The request must include the following
operation of mechanical and fluid systems. information:
There is no change to plant systems or the NRC Branch Chief: Jennifer Dixon-
Herrity. (1) A description of the licensing
response of systems to postulated accident
conditions. There is no change to the
action with a citation to this Federal
predicted radioactive releases due to normal Order Imposing Procedures for Access Register notice;
operation or postulated accident conditions. to Sensitive Unclassified Non- (2) The name and address of the
The plant response to previously evaluated Safeguards Information for Contention potential party and a description of the
accidents or external events is not adversely Preparation potential party’s particularized interest
affected, nor does the change described that could be harmed by the action
create any new accident precursors. Exelon Generation Company, LLC, identified in C.(1); and
Therefore, the proposed amendment does Docket Nos. 50–373 and 50–374, LaSalle (3) The identity of the individual or
not involve a significant increase in the County Station, Units 1 and 2, LaSalle entity requesting access to SUNSI and
consequences of an accident previously County, Illinois the requester’s basis for the need for the
evaluated.
2. Does the proposed amendment create South Carolina Electric & Gas Company information in order to meaningfully
the possibility of a new or different kind of and South Carolina Public Service participate in this adjudicatory
accident from any accident previously Authority, Docket Nos. 52–027 and 52– proceeding. In particular, the request
evaluated? 028, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, must explain why publicly available
Response: No. Units 2 and 3, Fairfield County, South versions of the information requested
The proposed change is to revise design would not be sufficient to provide the
details for the shield building roof, tension Carolina
basis and specificity for a proffered
ring, and air inlets and remove tie rods. The Southern Nuclear Operating Company, contention.
clarification and changes to the design details Inc., Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026, D. Based on an evaluation of the
for the shield building roof, tension ring, and
air inlets do not change the design
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 information submitted under paragraph
requirements of the nuclear island structures. and 4, Burke County, Georgia C.(3) the NRC staff will determine
The changes do not change the design within 10 days of receipt of the request
function, support, design, or operation of A. This Order contains instructions whether:
mechanical and fluid systems. The changes regarding how potential parties to this (1) There is a reasonable basis to
do not result in a new failure mechanism for proceeding may request access to believe the petitioner is likely to
the nuclear island structures or new accident documents containing Sensitive establish standing to participate in this
precursors. As a result, the design function Unclassified Non-Safeguards NRC proceeding; and
of the nuclear island structures is not Information (SUNSI). (2) The requestor has established a
adversely affected by the proposed change.
Therefore, the proposed changes do not B. Within 10 days after publication of legitimate need for access to SUNSI.
create the possibility of a new or different this notice of hearing and opportunity to E. If the NRC staff determines that the
type of accident from any accident petition for leave to intervene, any requestor satisfies both D.(1) and D.(2)
previously evaluated. potential party who believes access to above, the NRC staff will notify the
3. Does the proposed amendment involve SUNSI is necessary to respond to this requestor in writing that access to
a significant reduction in a margin of safety? notice may request access to SUNSI. A SUNSI has been granted. The written
Response: No. notification will contain instructions on
‘‘potential party’’ is any person who
No safety analysis or design basis how the requestor may obtain copies of
acceptance limit/criterion is challenged or intends to participate as a party by
demonstrating standing and filing an the requested documents, and any other
exceeded by the proposed changes, thus, no
margin of safety is reduced. The acceptance admissible contention under 10 CFR conditions that may apply to access to
limits for the design of seismic Category I 2.309. Requests for access to SUNSI those documents. These conditions may
structures are included in the codes and submitted later than 10 days after include, but are not limited to, the
standards used for the design, analysis, and publication of this notice will not be signing of a Non-Disclosure Agreement
construction of the structures. The two considered absent a showing of good or Affidavit, or Protective Order 2 setting
primary codes for the seismic Category I forth terms and conditions to prevent
cause for the late filing, addressing why
structures are American Institute of Steel the unauthorized or inadvertent
Construction (AISC) N690 and American the request could not have been filed
earlier. disclosure of SUNSI by each individual
Concrete Institute (ACI) 349. The design of
the shield building roof with the changes to
who will be granted access to SUNSI.
C. The requester shall submit a letter F. Filing of Contentions. Any
the reinforcement and roof beams satisfies requesting permission to access SUNSI
applicable provisions of AISC N690 and ACI contentions in these proceedings that
to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. are based upon the information received
349. The welding of the plate girders used for
roof beams meets the requirements of AISC
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as a result of the request made for
N690 and [American Welding Society Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention: SUNSI must be filed by the requestor no
(AWS)] D1.1. Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, later than 25 days after receipt of (or
Therefore, the proposed amendment does and provide a copy to the Associate access to) that information. However, if
not involve a significant reduction in a General Counsel for Hearings, more than 25 days remain between the
margin of safety. Enforcement and Administration, Office
The NRC staff has reviewed the of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear 1 While a request for hearing or petition to
licensee’s analysis and, based on this Regulatory Commission, Washington, intervene in this proceeding must comply with the
review, it appears that the three DC 20555–0001. The expedited delivery filing requirements of the NRC’s ‘‘E-Filing Rule,’’
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
or courier mail address for both offices the initial request to access SUNSI under these
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are procedures should be submitted as described in this
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff is: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, paragraph.
proposes to determine that the 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 2 Any motion for Protective Order or draft Non-
amendment request involves no Maryland 20852. The email address for Disclosure Affidavit or Agreement for SUNSI must
the Office of the Secretary and the be filed with the presiding officer or the Chief
significant hazards consideration. Administrative Judge if the presiding officer has not
Attorney for licensee: M. Stanford Office of the General Counsel are yet been designated, within 30 days of the deadline
Blanton, Balch & Bingham LLP, 1710 Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov and for the receipt of the written access request.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM 08MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_13063/page/6.svg)
![13026 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2017–04502 Filed 3–7–17; 8:45 am] published in the Federal Register on described in Items I, II and III below,
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P October 17, 2016, (81 FR 71543). which Items have been primarily
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting prepared by the clearing agency.3 The
transcripts are available on the NRC Commission is publishing this notice to
NUCLEAR REGULATORY Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- solicit comments on the Advance Notice
COMMISSION rm/doc-collections/acrs. Information from interested persons.
regarding topics to be discussed,
Advisory Committee on Reactor I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
changes to the agenda, whether the
Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the Terms of Substance of the Advance
meeting has been canceled or
ACRS Subcommittee on APR1400; Notice
rescheduled, and the time allotted to
Notice of Meeting present oral statements can be obtained This Advance Notice consists of
from the Web site cited above or by amendments to the FICC Government
The ACRS Subcommittee on APR1400 Securities Division (‘‘GSD’’) Rulebook
contacting the identified DFO.
will hold a meeting on March 21–23, (‘‘GSD Rules’’) 4 in order to include a
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
2017, 11545 Rockville Pike, Room T– minimum volatility calculation called
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
2B1, Rockville, Maryland 20852. the ‘‘Margin Proxy.’’ Under the
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
The meeting will be open to public to facilitate the conduct of the meeting, proposed rule change, FICC would
attendance with the exception of persons planning to attend should check apply the greater of the amount
portions that may be closed to protect with these references if such calculated by the current model-based
information that is proprietary pursuant rescheduling would result in a major volatility (‘‘Current Volatility
to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4). The agenda for inconvenience. Calculation’’) calculation and the
the subject meeting shall be as follows: If attending this meeting, please enter Margin Proxy when determining a GSD
Tuesday, March 21, 2017—1:00 p.m. through the One White Flint North Netting Member’s (‘‘Netting Member’s’’)
until 5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, March building, 11555 Rockville Pike, daily VaR Charge,5 as further described
22, 2017—8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.; Rockville, Maryland. After registering below. In addition, FICC would modify
Thursday, March 23, 2017—8:30 a.m. with Security, please contact Mr. the calculation of the Coverage Charge 6
until 12:00 p.m. Theron Brown (Telephone 240–888– in circumstances where the Margin
9835) to be escorted to the meeting Proxy applies, as further described
The Subcommittee will review the below.
APR1400 Design Control Document and room.
In order to effectuate the proposed
Safety Evaluation Report with Open Dated: March 1, 2017. rule changes described above, FICC
Items Chapter 6 (‘‘Engineered Safety Mark L. Banks, proposes to (1) add a new defined term
Features’’), Chapter 13 (‘‘Conduct of Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory for Margin Proxy in Rule 1 (Definitions);
Operations’’), and Chapter 16 Committee on Reactor Safeguards. (2) amend the definition of VaR Charge
(‘‘Technical Specifications’’). The [FR Doc. 2017–04541 Filed 3–7–17; 8:45 am] in Rule 1 to reference the Margin Proxy;
Subcommittee will hear presentations BILLING CODE 7590–01–P and (3) amend Section 1b of Rule 4
by and hold discussions with the NRC (Clearing Fund and Loss Allocation) to
staff and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power modify the calculation of the Coverage
Company regarding this matter. The Charge when the Margin Proxy is
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Subcommittee will gather information, applied.
COMMISSION
analyze relevant issues and facts, and
formulate proposed positions and [Release No. 34–80139; File No. SR–FICC– II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation 2017–801] Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
by the Full Committee. Advance Notice
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed In its filing with the Commission, the
Members of the public desiring to
Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of clearing agency included statements
provide oral statements and/or written
Filing of Advance Notice To (1) concerning the purpose of and basis for
comments should notify the Designated
Implement the Margin Proxy and (2) the Advance Notice and discussed any
Federal Official (DFO), Christopher
Modify the Calculation of the Coverage comments it received on the Advance
Brown (Telephone 301–415–7111 or
Charge in Circumstances Where the Notice. The text of these statements may
Email: Christopher.Brown@nrc.gov) five
Margin Proxy Applies be examined at the places specified in
days prior to the meeting, if possible, so
that appropriate arrangements can be March 2, 2017. Item IV below. The clearing agency has
made. Thirty-five hard copies of each Pursuant to Section 806(e)(1) of Title prepared summaries, set forth in
presentation or handout should be VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street sections A and B below, of the most
provided to the DFO thirty minutes Reform and Consumer Protection Act significant aspects of such statements.
before the meeting. In addition, one entitled the Payment, Clearing, and
3 On February 2, 2017, FICC filed this Advance
electronic copy of each presentation Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 Notice as a proposed rule change (SR–FICC–2017–
should be emailed to the DFO one day (‘‘Clearing Supervision Act’’) 1 and Rule 001) with the Commission pursuant to Section
before the meeting. If an electronic copy 19b–4(n)(1)(i) under the Securities 19(b)(1) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), and Rule
cannot be provided within this Exchange Act of 1934, as amended 19b–4, 17 CFR 240.19b–4. A copy of the proposed
timeframe, presenters should provide rule change is available at.
(‘‘Act’’),2 notice is hereby given that on 4 Capitalized terms used herein and not defined
the DFO with a CD containing each
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
February 2, 2017, Fixed Income Clearing shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in
presentation at least thirty minutes Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed with the U.S. the GSD Rules available at www.dtcc.com/legal/
before the meeting. Electronic Securities and Exchange Commission rules-and-procedures.aspx.
recordings will be permitted only (‘‘Commission’’) the advance notice SR– 5 The Margin Proxy would be calculated as part
during those portions of the meeting of the determination of the VaR Charge that occurs
FICC–2017–801 (‘‘Advance Notice’’) as twice daily, based on start-of-day positions and
that are open to the public. Detailed noon positions.
procedures for the conduct of and 1 See 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1). 6 See description of Coverage Charge in GSD Rule
participation in ACRS meetings were 2 See 17 CFR 240.19b–4(n)(1)(i). 1, Definitions, supra note 4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Mar 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM 08MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_13063/page/8.svg)
Document Created: 2017-03-08 05:06:35
Document Modified: 2017-03-08 05:06:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | License amendment request; notice of opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene; order imposing procedures. | |
| Dates | Comments must be filed by April 7, 2017. A request for a hearing must be filed by May 8, 2017. Any potential party as defined in Sec. 2.4 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), who believes access to SUNSI is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by March 20, 2017. | |
| Contact | Janet Burkhardt, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1384, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 13019 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR