82 FR 14494 - Special Local Regulation; Corsica River, Queen Anne's County, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 53 (March 21, 2017)

Page Range		14494-14496
FR Document		2017-05544
The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local regulations for certain waters of the Corsica River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters located in Queen Anne's County, MD during a rowing event on April 22, 2017. If necessary, due to inclement weather, the event will be rescheduled to April 23, 2017. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 53 (Tuesday, March 21, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 21, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14494-14496]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05544]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0168]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Corsica River, Queen Anne's County, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local 
regulations for certain waters of the Corsica River. This action is 
necessary to provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters 
located in Queen Anne's County, MD during a rowing event on April 22, 
2017. If necessary, due to inclement weather, the event will be 
rescheduled to April 23, 2017. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit 
persons and vessels from entering the regulated area unless authorized 
by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or the 
Coast Guard Patrol Commander. We invite your comments on this proposed 
rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before April 20, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0168 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard 
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 410-576-2674, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On February 16, 2017, The Gunston School of Centreville, MD 
notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a rowing regatta 
from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m. on April 22, 2017, and if necessary, due to 
inclement weather, from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m. on April 23, 2017. The high 
school rowing event consists of approximately 30 participants competing 
on a designated 1500-meter distance course in the Corsica River that 
starts at Rocky Point and finishes at Jacobs Nose near Centreville, MD. 
Hazards from the rowing competition include participants operating 
within and adjacent to the designated navigation channel and 
interfering with vessels intending to operate within that channel, as 
well as rowing within approaches to local public and private marinas 
and boat facilities. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region has 
determined that potential hazards associated with the rowing event 
would be a safety concern for anyone intending to participate in this 
event or for vessels that operate within specified waters of the 
Corsica River in Queen Anne's County, MD.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect event participants, 
spectators and transiting vessels on specified waters of the Corsica 
River before, during, and after the scheduled event.
    The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 
U.S.C. 1233, which authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define 
special local regulations.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region proposes to establish 
special local regulations from 7:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. on April 22, 
2017, and if necessary, due to inclement weather, from 7:30 a.m. until 
2:30 p.m. on April 23, 2017. The regulated area would include all 
navigable waters of the Corsica River, from shoreline to shoreline, 
within an area bounded on the east by a line drawn from latitude 
39[deg]04'32'' N., longitude 076[deg]05'20'' W., thence south to 
latitude 39[deg]04'07'' N., longitude 076[deg]05'20'' W., and bounded 
on the west by a line drawn from latitude 39[deg]04'59'' N., longitude 
076[deg]06'30'' W., thence south to latitude 39[deg]04'44'' N., 
longitude 076[deg]06'30'' W., located near Centreville, MD. The 
duration of the regulated area is intended to ensure the safety of 
event participants and vessels within the specified navigable waters 
before, during, and after the scheduled 8 a.m. until 2 p.m. rowing 
competition. Except for The Gunston Invitational participants, no 
vessel or person would be permitted to enter the regulated area without 
obtaining permission from the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or 
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The regulatory text we are proposing 
appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize 
our analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,

[[Page 14495]]

the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size and 
duration of the regulated area, which would impact a small designated 
area of the Corsica River for 7 hours. The Coast Guard would issue a 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the 
status of the regulated area. Moreover, the rule would allow vessel 
operators to request permission to enter the regulated area for the 
purpose of safely transiting the regulated area if deemed safe to do so 
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves 
implementation of regulations within 33 CFR part 100 applicable to 
organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United States 
that may negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore side 
activities within the event area. This category of marine event water 
activities includes but is not limited to sail boat regattas, boat 
parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew racing, canoe and 
sail board racing. Normally such actions are categorically excluded 
from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist 
and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information 
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact 
from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online

[[Page 14496]]

docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following 
that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online 
docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments 
are posted or a final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.35-T05-0168 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.501-T05-0168  Special Local Regulation; Corsica River, Queen 
Anne's County, MD.

    (a) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital 
Region means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National 
Capital Region or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty 
officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on 
his behalf.
    (2) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or 
petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the 
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    (3) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by 
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region with a 
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast 
Guard ensign.
    (4) Participant means all persons and vessels participating in The 
Gunston Invitational event under the auspices of the Marine Event 
Permit issued to the event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast 
Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    (b) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All 
navigable waters of the Corsica River, from shoreline to shoreline, 
within an area bounded on the east by a line drawn from latitude 
39[deg]04'32'' N., longitude 076[deg]05'20'' W., thence south to 
latitude 39[deg]04'07'' N., longitude 076[deg]05'20'' W., and bounded 
on the west by a line drawn from latitude 39[deg]04'59'' N., longitude 
076[deg]06'30'' W., thence south to latitude 39[deg]04'44'' N., 
longitude 076[deg]06'30'' W., located near Centreville, MD. All 
coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
    (c) Special local regulations. (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander 
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons, 
including event participants, in the regulated area. When hailed or 
signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the regulated 
area shall immediately comply with the directions given. Failure to do 
so may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to 
comply, or both. The Coast Guard Patrol Commander may terminate the 
event, or the operation of any support vessel participating in the 
event, at any time it is deemed necessary for the protection of life or 
property.
    (2) Except for participants and vessels already at berth, all 
persons and vessels within the regulated area at the time it is 
implemented shall depart the regulated area.
    (3) Persons and vessels desiring to transit, moor, or anchor within 
the regulated area must obtain authorization from Captain of the Port 
Maryland-National Capital Region or Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Prior 
to the enforcement period, vessel operators may request permission to 
transit, moor, or anchor within the regulated area from Captain of the 
Port Maryland-National Capital Region at telephone number 410-576-2693 
or on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). During the 
enforcement period, persons or vessel operators may request permission 
to transit, moor, or anchor within the regulated area from the Coast 
Guard Patrol Commander on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 
MHz).
    (4) The Coast Guard may be assisted with marine event patrol and 
enforcement of the regulated area by other Federal, State, and local 
agencies. The Coast Guard Patrol Commander and official patrol vessels 
enforcing this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio 
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 MHz).
    (5) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard 
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information 
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date 
and times.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7:30 
a.m. until 2:30 p.m. on April 22, 2017, and if necessary, due to 
inclement weather, from 7:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. on April 23, 2017.

    Dated: March 15, 2017.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National 
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2017-05544 Filed 3-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
14494 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules

necessary under the provisions of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region The purpose of this rulemaking is to
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of or the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. protect event participants, spectators
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532. We invite your comments on this and transiting vessels on specified
proposed rulemaking. waters of the Corsica River before,
Regulatory Flexibility Act
DATES: Comments and related material during, and after the scheduled event.
The Administrator, in accordance must be received by the Coast Guard on The Coast Guard proposes this
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 or before April 20, 2017. rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
U.S.C. 601–612) (RFA), has reviewed 1233, which authorize the Coast Guard
this proposed rule and by approving it ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to establish and define special local
certifies that the rule will not, if identified by docket number USCG– regulations.
promulgated, have a significant 2017–0168 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http:// III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. There are www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public The COTP Maryland-National Capital
nearly 1.7 million DEA registrations, of Participation and Request for Region proposes to establish special
which, a large majority either are held Comments’’ portion of the local regulations from 7:30 a.m. until
by small entities or are those employed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for 2:30 p.m. on April 22, 2017, and if
by small entities. As discussed above, further instructions on submitting necessary, due to inclement weather,
the DEA estimates the estimated annual comments. from 7:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. on April
cost of $3.8 million is offset by FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 23, 2017. The regulated area would
reprioritization of other DCFA you have questions about this proposed include all navigable waters of the
expenditures, resulting in a net zero rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Corsica River, from shoreline to
economic effect and no impact on Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector shoreline, within an area bounded on
registration fees for any registrants. Maryland-National Capital Region; the east by a line drawn from latitude
Therefore, the DEA estimates that the telephone 410–576–2674, email 39°04′32″ N., longitude 076°05′20″ W.,
rule will not, if promulgated, have a Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. thence south to latitude 39°04′07″ N.,
significant effect on a substantial longitude 076°05′20″ W., and bounded
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
number of these small entities. on the west by a line drawn from
I. Table of Abbreviations latitude 39°04′59″ N., longitude
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 076°06′30″ W., thence south to latitude
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
This action does not impose a new COTP Captain of the Port 39°04′44″ N., longitude 076°06′30″ W.,
collection of information requirement DHS Department of Homeland Security located near Centreville, MD. The
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of E.O. Executive order duration of the regulated area is
1995. 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521 FR Federal Register intended to ensure the safety of event
Dated: March 11, 2017. NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking participants and vessels within the
Pub. L. Public Law specified navigable waters before,
Chuck Rosenberg, § Section during, and after the scheduled 8 a.m.
Acting Administrator. U.S.C. United States Code until 2 p.m. rowing competition. Except
[FR Doc. 2017–05396 Filed 3–20–17; 8:45 am]
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal for The Gunston Invitational
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P participants, no vessel or person would
Basis
be permitted to enter the regulated area
On February 16, 2017, The Gunston without obtaining permission from the
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND School of Centreville, MD notified the COTP Maryland-National Capital
SECURITY Coast Guard that it will be conducting Region or the Coast Guard Patrol
a rowing regatta from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m. Commander. The regulatory text we are
Coast Guard on April 22, 2017, and if necessary, due proposing appears at the end of this
to inclement weather, from 8 a.m. until document.
33 CFR Part 100 2 p.m. on April 23, 2017. The high
school rowing event consists of IV. Regulatory Analyses
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0168]
approximately 30 participants We developed this proposed rule after
RIN 1625–AA08 competing on a designated 1500-meter considering numerous statutes and
distance course in the Corsica River that Executive orders (E.O.s) related to
Special Local Regulation; Corsica starts at Rocky Point and finishes at rulemaking. Below we summarize our
River, Queen Anne’s County, MD Jacobs Nose near Centreville, MD. analyses based on a number of these
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. Hazards from the rowing competition statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. include participants operating within Amendment rights of protestors.
and adjacent to the designated
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to navigation channel and interfering with A. Regulatory Planning and Review
establish special local regulations for vessels intending to operate within that E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
certain waters of the Corsica River. This channel, as well as rowing within to assess the costs and benefits of
action is necessary to provide for the approaches to local public and private available regulatory alternatives and, if
safety of life on the navigable waters marinas and boat facilities. The COTP regulation is necessary, to select
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS

located in Queen Anne’s County, MD Maryland-National Capital Region has regulatory approaches that maximize
during a rowing event on April 22, determined that potential hazards net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
2017. If necessary, due to inclement associated with the rowing event would importance of quantifying both costs
weather, the event will be rescheduled be a safety concern for anyone intending and benefits, of reducing costs, of
to April 23, 2017. This proposed to participate in this event or for vessels harmonizing rules, and of promoting
rulemaking would prohibit persons and that operate within specified waters of flexibility. This NPRM has not been
vessels from entering the regulated area the Corsica River in Queen Anne’s designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
unless authorized by the Captain of the County, MD. action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Mar 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM 21MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules 14495

the NPRM has not been reviewed by the the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 that may negatively impact the safety of
Office of Management and Budget. (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). waterway users and shore side activities
This regulatory action determination within the event area. This category of
is based on the size and duration of the D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
marine event water activities includes
regulated area, which would impact a Governments
but is not limited to sail boat regattas,
small designated area of the Corsica A rule has implications for federalism boat parades, power boat racing,
River for 7 hours. The Coast Guard under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has swimming events, crew racing, canoe
would issue a Broadcast Notice to a substantial direct effect on the States, and sail board racing. Normally such
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel on the relationship between the national actions are categorically excluded from
16 about the status of the regulated area. government and the States, or on the further review under paragraph 34(h) of
Moreover, the rule would allow vessel distribution of power and Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
operators to request permission to enter responsibilities among the various M16475.lD. A preliminary
the regulated area for the purpose of levels of government. We have analyzed environmental analysis checklist and
safely transiting the regulated area if this proposed rule under that Order and Categorical Exclusion Determination are
deemed safe to do so by the Coast Guard have determined that it is consistent available in the docket where indicated
Patrol Commander. with the fundamental federalism under ADDRESSES. We seek any
principles and preemption requirements comments or information that may lead
B. Impact on Small Entities described in E.O. 13132. to the discovery of a significant
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Also, this proposed rule does not have environmental impact from this
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, tribal implications under E.O. 13175, proposed rule.
requires Federal agencies to consider Consultation and Coordination with
the potential impact of regulations on Indian Tribal Governments, because it G. Protest Activities
small entities during rulemaking. The would not have a substantial direct The Coast Guard respects the First
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small effect on one or more Indian tribes, on Amendment rights of protesters.
businesses, not-for-profit organizations the relationship between the Federal Protesters are asked to contact the
that are independently owned and Government and Indian tribes, or on the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
operated and are not dominant in their distribution of power and INFORMATION CONTACT section to
fields, and governmental jurisdictions responsibilities between the Federal coordinate protest activities so that your
with populations of less than 50,000. Government and Indian tribes. If you message can be received without
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. believe this proposed rule has jeopardizing the safety or security of
605(b) that this proposed rule would not implications for federalism or Indian people, places, or vessels.
have a significant economic impact on tribes, please contact the person listed
V. Public Participation and Request for
a substantial number of small entities. in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
While some owners or operators of Comments
CONTACT section above.
vessels intending to transit the regulated We view public participation as
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act essential to effective rulemaking, and
area may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act will consider all comments and material
proposed rule would not have a of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires received during the comment period.
significant economic impact on any Federal agencies to assess the effects of Your comment can help shape the
vessel owner or operator. their discretionary regulatory actions. In outcome of this rulemaking. If you
If you think that your business, particular, the Act addresses actions submit a comment, please include the
organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a docket number for this rulemaking,
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity State, local, or tribal government, in the indicate the specific section of this
and that this rule would have a aggregate, or by the private sector of document to which each comment
significant economic impact on it, $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or applies, and provide a reason for
please submit a comment (see more in any one year. Though this each suggestion or recommendation.
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it proposed rule would not result in such We encourage you to submit
qualifies and how and to what degree an expenditure, we do discuss the comments through the Federal
this rule would economically affect it. effects of this rule elsewhere in this eRulemaking Portal at http://
Under section 213(a) of the Small preamble. www.regulations.gov. If your material
Business Regulatory Enforcement cannot be submitted using http://
F. Environment
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), www.regulations.gov, contact the person
we want to assist small entities in We have analyzed this proposed rule in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
understanding this proposed rule. If the under Department of Homeland CONTACT section of this document for
rule would affect your small business, Security Management Directive 023–01 alternate instructions.
organization, or governmental and Commandant Instruction We accept anonymous comments. All
jurisdiction and you have questions M16475.lD, which guide the Coast comments received will be posted
concerning its provisions or options for Guard in complying with the National without change to http://
compliance, please contact the person Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 www.regulations.gov and will include
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a any personal information you have
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will preliminary determination that this provided. For more about privacy and
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS

not retaliate against small entities that action is one of a category of actions that the docket, you may review a Privacy
question or complain about this do not individually or cumulatively Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
proposed rule or any policy or action of have a significant effect on the human Management System in the March 24,
the Coast Guard. environment. This proposed rule 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
involves implementation of regulations FR 15086).
C. Collection of Information within 33 CFR part 100 applicable to Documents mentioned in this NPRM
This proposed rule would not call for organized marine events on the as being available in the docket, and all
a new collection of information under navigable waters of the United States public comments, will be in our online

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Mar 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM 21MRP1
Document Created: 2017-03-21 01:09:27
Document Modified: 2017-03-21 01:09:27
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before April 20, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 14494
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways
82 FR 14494 - Special Local Regulation; Corsica River, Queen Anne's County, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 53 (March 21, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
