82 FR 14555 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX Market LLC (“BOX”) Options Facility

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 53 (March 21, 2017)

Page Range		14555-14556
FR Document		2017-05496
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 53 (Tuesday, March 21, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14555-14556]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80246; File No. SR-BOX-2017-09]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX Market LLC (``BOX'') Options Facility

March 15, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on March 7, 2017, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the 
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\ 
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal 
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule on 
the BOX Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility. While changes to the fee 
schedule pursuant to this proposal will be effective upon filing, the 
changes will become operative on March 8, 2017. The text of the 
proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the 
Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the 
Exchange's Internet Web site at http://boxexchange.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX. 
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to revise certain qualification 
thresholds in Sections I.B.1 of the BOX Fee Schedule, Primary 
Improvement Order and I.B.2 of the BOX Fee Schedule, the BOX Volume 
Rebate (``BVR'').
Primary Improvement Order
    Under the tiered fee schedule for Primary Improvement Orders, the 
Exchange assesses a per contract execution fee to all Primary 
Improvement Order executions where the corresponding PIP or COPIP Order 
is from the account of a Public Customer. Percentage thresholds are 
calculated on a monthly basis by totaling the Initiating Participant's 
Primary Improvement Order volume submitted to BOX, relative to the 
total national Customer volume in multiply-listed options classes. The 
Exchange proposes to delete current Tier 4 in its entirety and renumber 
the tiers accordingly. The Exchange also proposes to adjust the 
percentage threshold in proposed Tier 4. Specifically, the Exchange 
proposes to change proposed Tier 4 from ``0.800% and Above'' to 
``0.500% and Above.'' The Exchange notes that it is not proposing any 
changes to the fees within the Primary Improvement Order fee structure 
and the quantity submitted will continue to be calculated on a monthly 
basis by totaling the Initiating Participant's Primary Improvement 
Order volume submitted to BOX, relative to the total national Customer 
volume in multiply-listed options classes.
BVR
    Next, the Exchange proposes to adjust certain percentage thresholds 
within the BVR. Under the BVR, the Exchange offers a tiered per 
contract rebate for all Public Customer PIP Orders and COPIP Orders of 
100 and under contracts that do not trade solely with their contra 
order. Percentage thresholds are calculated on a monthly basis by 
totaling the Participant's PIP and COPIP volume submitted to BOX, 
relative to the total national Customer volume in multiply-listed 
options classes. The Exchange proposes to adjust the percentage 
thresholds in Tiers 3 and 4. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to 
change Tier 3 from ``0.340% to 0.799%'' to ``0.340% to 0.499%'' and 
Tier 4 from ``0.800% and Above'' to ``0.500% and Above.'' The Exchange 
notes that is it not proposing any changes to the fees within the BVR. 
The quantity submitted will continue to be calculated on a monthly 
basis by totaling the Participant's PIP and COPIP volume submitted to 
BOX, relative to the total national Customer volume in multiply-listed 
options classes.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section 
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it provides 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other 
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities 
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers 
or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BOX believes it is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory to adjust the monthly Percentage Thresholds of National 
Customer Volume in Multiply-Listed Options Classes. The volume 
thresholds with their tiered fees and rebates are meant to incentivize 
Participants to direct order flow to the Exchange to obtain the benefit 
of the lower fee or higher rebate, which in turn benefits all market 
participants by increasing liquidity on the Exchange.
    The Exchange believes the proposed amendments to the Primary 
Improvement Order percentage thresholds are reasonable, equitable and 
not unfairly discriminatory. The proposed changes to the thresholds are 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as they are available to all 
BOX Participants that initiate Auction Transactions, and Participants 
may choose whether or not to take

[[Page 14556]]

advantage of the percentage thresholds and their applicable discounted 
fees. Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes are 
reasonable and competitive as they will further incentivize 
Participants to direct order flow to the Exchange, benefiting all 
market participants.
    The Exchange also believes the proposed amendments to the BVR in 
Section I.B.2 of the BOX Fee Schedule are reasonable, equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory. The BVR was adopted to attract Public Customer 
order flow to the Exchange by offering these Participants incentives to 
submit their Public Customer PIP and COPIP Orders to the Exchange and 
the Exchange believes it is appropriate to now amend the BVR. The 
Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to 
amend the BVR, as all Participants have the ability to qualify for a 
rebate, and rebates are provided equally to qualifying Participants. 
Other exchanges employ similar incentive programs; \6\ and the Exchange 
believes that the proposed changes to the volume thresholds are 
reasonable and competitive when compared to incentive structures at 
other exchanges. Finally, the Exchange believes it is reasonable and 
appropriate to continue to provide incentives for Public Customers, 
which will result in greater liquidity and ultimately benefit all 
Participants trading on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Section B of the PHLX Pricing Schedule entitled 
``Customer Rebate Program;'' ISE Gemini's Qualifying Tier Thresholds 
(page 6 of the ISE Gemini Fee Schedule); and CBOE's Volume Incentive 
Program (VIP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange is simply 
proposing to amend certain percentage thresholds for Auction 
Transaction fees and rebates in the BOX Fee Schedule. The Exchange 
believes that the volume based rebates and fees increase intermarket 
and intramarket competition by incenting Participants to direct their 
order flow to the exchange, which benefits all participants by 
providing more trading opportunities and improves competition on the 
Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) 
thereunder,\8\ because it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-BOX-2017-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2017-09. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2017-09, and should be 
submitted on or before April 11, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-05496 Filed 3-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 21, 2017 / Notices 14555

For the Commission, by the Division of II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s BVR
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Statement of the Purpose of, and Next, the Exchange proposes to adjust
authority.15 Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule certain percentage thresholds within the
Eduardo A. Aleman, Change BVR. Under the BVR, the Exchange
Assistant Secretary. offers a tiered per contract rebate for all
In its filing with the Commission, the
[FR Doc. 2017–05501 Filed 3–20–17; 8:45 am]
Exchange included statements Public Customer PIP Orders and COPIP
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Orders of 100 and under contracts that
concerning the purpose of and basis for
do not trade solely with their contra
the proposed rule change and discussed
order. Percentage thresholds are
any comments it received on the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE calculated on a monthly basis by
proposed rule change. The text of these totaling the Participant’s PIP and COPIP
COMMISSION
statements may be examined at the volume submitted to BOX, relative to
places specified in Item IV below. The the total national Customer volume in
[Release No. 34–80246; File No. SR–BOX– Exchange has prepared summaries, set
2017–09] multiply-listed options classes. The
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of Exchange proposes to adjust the
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX the most significant aspects of such percentage thresholds in Tiers 3 and 4.
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of statements. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s change Tier 3 from ‘‘0.340% to 0.799%’’
a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Statement of the Purpose of, and to ‘‘0.340% to 0.499%’’ and Tier 4 from
the Fee Schedule on the BOX Market Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule ‘‘0.800% and Above’’ to ‘‘0.500% and
LLC (‘‘BOX’’) Options Facility Change Above.’’ The Exchange notes that is it
not proposing any changes to the fees
March 15, 2017. 1. Purpose within the BVR. The quantity submitted
will continue to be calculated on a
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the The Exchange proposes to amend the monthly basis by totaling the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX. Participant’s PIP and COPIP volume
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Specifically, the Exchange proposes to submitted to BOX, relative to the total
notice is hereby given that on March 7, revise certain qualification thresholds in national Customer volume in multiply-
2017, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the Sections I.B.1 of the BOX Fee Schedule, listed options classes.
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities Primary Improvement Order and I.B.2 of
and Exchange Commission the BOX Fee Schedule, the BOX Volume 2. Statutory Basis
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule Rebate (‘‘BVR’’). The Exchange believes that the
change as described in Items I, II, and proposal is consistent with the
III below, which Items have been Primary Improvement Order requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,
prepared by the Exchange. The Under the tiered fee schedule for in general, and Section 6(b)(4) and
Exchange filed the proposed rule change Primary Improvement Orders, the 6(b)(5)of the Act,5 in particular, in that
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange assesses a per contract it provides for the equitable allocation
Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 execution fee to all Primary of reasonable dues, fees, and other
which renders the proposal effective Improvement Order executions where charges among BOX Participants and
upon filing with the Commission. The the corresponding PIP or COPIP Order other persons using its facilities and
Commission is publishing this notice to is from the account of a Public does not unfairly discriminate between
solicit comments on the proposed rule Customer. Percentage thresholds are customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
change from interested persons. calculated on a monthly basis by BOX believes it is reasonable,
totaling the Initiating Participant’s equitable and not unfairly
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s discriminatory to adjust the monthly
Statement of the Terms of the Substance Primary Improvement Order volume
Percentage Thresholds of National
submitted to BOX, relative to the total
of the Proposed Rule Change Customer Volume in Multiply-Listed
national Customer volume in multiply-
Options Classes. The volume thresholds
The Exchange is filing with the listed options classes. The Exchange
with their tiered fees and rebates are
Securities and Exchange Commission proposes to delete current Tier 4 in its
meant to incentivize Participants to
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change entirety and renumber the tiers direct order flow to the Exchange to
to amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX accordingly. The Exchange also obtain the benefit of the lower fee or
Market LLC (‘‘BOX’’) options facility. proposes to adjust the percentage higher rebate, which in turn benefits all
While changes to the fee schedule threshold in proposed Tier 4. market participants by increasing
pursuant to this proposal will be Specifically, the Exchange proposes to liquidity on the Exchange.
effective upon filing, the changes will change proposed Tier 4 from ‘‘0.800% The Exchange believes the proposed
become operative on March 8, 2017. The and Above’’ to ‘‘0.500% and Above.’’ amendments to the Primary
text of the proposed rule change is The Exchange notes that it is not Improvement Order percentage
available from the principal office of the proposing any changes to the fees thresholds are reasonable, equitable and
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public within the Primary Improvement Order not unfairly discriminatory. The
fee structure and the quantity submitted
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Reference Room and also on the proposed changes to the thresholds are
Exchange’s Internet Web site at http:// will continue to be calculated on a equitable and not unfairly
boxexchange.com. monthly basis by totaling the Initiating discriminatory as they are available to
Participant’s Primary Improvement all BOX Participants that initiate
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Order volume submitted to BOX, Auction Transactions, and Participants
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. relative to the total national Customer may choose whether or not to take
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). volume in multiply-listed options
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). classes. 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Mar 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1
14556 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 21, 2017 / Notices

advantage of the percentage thresholds III. Date of Effectiveness of the printing in the Commission’s Public
and their applicable discounted fees. Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Further, the Exchange believes that the Commission Action Washington, DC 20549 on official
proposed changes are reasonable and The foregoing rule change has become business days between the hours of
competitive as they will further effective pursuant to Section 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
incentivize Participants to direct order 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act 7 and filing also will be available for
flow to the Exchange, benefiting all Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,8 because it inspection and copying at the principal
market participants. establishes or changes a due, or fee. office of the Exchange. All comments
The Exchange also believes the At any time within 60 days of the received will be posted without change;
proposed amendments to the BVR in filing of the proposed rule change, the the Commission does not edit personal
Section I.B.2 of the BOX Fee Schedule Commission summarily may identifying information from
are reasonable, equitable and not temporarily suspend the rule change if submissions. You should submit only
unfairly discriminatory. The BVR was it appears to the Commission that the information that you wish to make
adopted to attract Public Customer order action is necessary or appropriate in the available publicly. All submissions
flow to the Exchange by offering these public interest, for the protection of should refer to File Number SR–BOX–
Participants incentives to submit their investors, or would otherwise further 2017–09, and should be submitted on or
Public Customer PIP and COPIP Orders the purposes of the Act. If the before April 11, 2017.
to the Exchange and the Exchange Commission takes such action, the For the Commission, by the Division of
believes it is appropriate to now amend Commission shall institute proceedings Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
the BVR. The Exchange believes it is to determine whether the proposed rule authority.9
equitable and not unfairly should be approved or disapproved. Eduardo A. Aleman,
discriminatory to amend the BVR, as all
IV. Solicitation of Comments Assistant Secretary.
Participants have the ability to qualify
for a rebate, and rebates are provided [FR Doc. 2017–05496 Filed 3–20–17; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to
equally to qualifying Participants. Other submit written data, views, and BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
exchanges employ similar incentive arguments concerning the foregoing,
programs; 6 and the Exchange believes including whether the proposed rule
that the proposed changes to the volume SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
change is consistent with the Act.
thresholds are reasonable and COMMISSION
Comments may be submitted by any of
competitive when compared to the following methods: [Release No. 34–80259; File No. 4–707]
incentive structures at other exchanges.
Finally, the Exchange believes it is Electronic Comments Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE
reasonable and appropriate to continue • Use the Commission’s Internet Mercury, LLC; Notice of Filing of
to provide incentives for Public comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Proposed Minor Rule Violation Plan
Customers, which will result in greater rules/sro.shtml); or
liquidity and ultimately benefit all • Send an email to rule-comments@ March 16, 2017.
Participants trading on the Exchange. sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Pursuant to Section 19(d)(1) of the
BOX–2017–09 on the subject line. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19d–1(c)(2)
Statement on Burden on Competition Paper Comments thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
The Exchange does not believe that • Send paper comments in triplicate on March 9, 2017, ISE Mercury, LLC
the proposed rule change will impose to Secretary, Securities and Exchange (‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
any burden on competition not Commission, 100 F Street NE., and Exchange Commission
necessary or appropriate in furtherance Washington, DC 20549–1090. (‘‘Commission’’) a proposed minor rule
of the purposes of the Act. The All submissions should refer to File violation plan (‘‘MRVP’’) with sanctions
Exchange is simply proposing to amend Number SR–BOX–2017–09. This file not exceeding $2,500 which would not
certain percentage thresholds for number should be included on the be subject to the provisions of Rule 19d–
Auction Transaction fees and rebates in subject line if email is used. To help the 1(c)(1) of the Act 3 requiring that a self-
the BOX Fee Schedule. The Exchange Commission process and review your regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’)
believes that the volume based rebates comments more efficiently, please use promptly file notice with the
and fees increase intermarket and only one method. The Commission will Commission of any final disciplinary
intramarket competition by incenting post all comments on the Commission’s action taken with respect to any person
Participants to direct their order flow to Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ or organization.4 In accordance with
the exchange, which benefits all rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
participants by providing more trading submission, all subsequent 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(d)(1).
opportunities and improves competition amendments, all written statements
2 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2).
on the Exchange. with respect to the proposed rule 3 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(1).

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s change that are filed with the 4 The Commission adopted amendments to

Statement on Comments on the Commission, and all written paragraph (c) of Rule 19d–1 to allow SROs to
Proposed Rule Change Received From communications relating to the submit for Commission approval plans for the
proposed rule change between the abbreviated reporting of minor disciplinary
Members, Participants, or Others infractions. See Securities Exchange Act Release
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Commission and any person, other than No. 21013 (June 1, 1984), 49 FR 23828 (June 8,
No written comments were either those that may be withheld from the 1984). Any disciplinary action taken by an SRO
solicited or received. public in accordance with the against any person for violation of a rule of the SRO
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be which has been designated as a minor rule violation
6 See Section B of the PHLX Pricing Schedule pursuant to such a plan filed with and declared
entitled ‘‘Customer Rebate Program;’’ ISE Gemini’s
available for Web site viewing and effective by the Commission shall not be considered
Qualifying Tier Thresholds (page 6 of the ISE ‘‘final’’ for purposes of Section 19(d)(1) of the Act
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
Gemini Fee Schedule); and CBOE’s Volume if the sanction imposed consists of a fine not
Incentive Program (VIP). 8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). exceeding $2,500 and the sanctioned person has not

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Mar 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1
Document Created: 2017-03-21 01:09:22
Document Modified: 2017-03-21 01:09:22
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		82 FR 14555