82_FR_15380 82 FR 15322 - Tonto National Forest; Gila County, AZ; Pinto Valley Mine Environmental Impact Statement

82 FR 15322 - Tonto National Forest; Gila County, AZ; Pinto Valley Mine Environmental Impact Statement

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 58 (March 28, 2017)

Page Range15322-15324
FR Document2017-06020

The Tonto National Forest (TNF) is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate and disclose the potential environmental effects from approval of the Mining Plan of Operations (MPO) submitted by Pinto Valley Mining Corp. (PVMC), for operations on National Forest System (NFS) land associated with expansion of an existing open pit copper and molybdenum mine, the Pinto Valley Mine. An amendment to the Tonto National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan, 1985, as amended) may be required.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 58 (Tuesday, March 28, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15322-15324]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Tonto National Forest; Gila County, AZ; Pinto Valley Mine 
Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement 
for approval of a mining plan of operations for the Pinto Valley Mine, 
notice of public scoping, and request for scoping comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Tonto National Forest (TNF) is preparing an Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate and disclose the potential 
environmental effects from approval of the Mining Plan of Operations 
(MPO) submitted by Pinto Valley Mining Corp. (PVMC), for operations on 
National Forest System (NFS) land associated with expansion of an 
existing open pit copper and molybdenum mine, the Pinto Valley Mine. An 
amendment to the Tonto National Forest Land and Resource Management 
Plan (Forest Plan, 1985, as amended) may be required.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
no later than April 27, 2017. Public scoping meetings will be held on 
April 18 at Superior Junior/Senior High School, 100 Mary Drive, 
Superior, Arizona and April 20 at Miami Junior/Senior High School, 4739 
S. Ragus Rd., Miami, Arizona from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Pinto Valley Mine EIS Comments, 
2324 E McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85006. Comments may also be sent via 
email to [email protected], or via facsimile to (602) 225-
5302, ATTN: Pinto Valley Mine EIS Comments. Written and oral comments 
may also be submitted during scoping meetings that will be held by the 
U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service) on April 18 and 20. Additional 
details may be found at the Pinto Valley Mine EIS Web site at http://www.pintovalleymineeis.us.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judd Sampson, Interim Project Manager, 
at 602-225-5272 or [email protected] during normal business hours. 
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PVMC submitted the proposed MPO for approval 
by the Forest Service in May 2016. The proposed MPO was submitted in 
accordance with Forest Service

[[Page 15323]]

regulations for locatable minerals set forth at Title 36 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR), part 228 (36 CFR part 228), subpart A, 
Locatable Minerals.
    The proposed action would consolidate prior permitted activities 
reasonably incident to extraction, transportation, and processing of 
copper and molybdenum on NFS lands and expand existing mining 
operations from private lands on to NFS lands primarily for tailings 
disposal and pit expansion.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The purpose of this project is to analyze the proposed action as 
required by the regulations at 36 CFR 228.5(a). Approval of the 
proposed MPO would be a major federal action subject to National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Accordingly, the Forest 
Service must prepare an EIS to identify the scope of issues associated 
with the MPO, identify and assess reasonable alternatives to the MPO in 
order to avoid or minimize adverse effects of MPO actions and evaluate 
and disclose the potential environmental effects. An amendment to the 
Tonto National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan, 
1985, as amended) may be required.
    The need for this project is to comply with the regulations of the 
Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, that govern the use of 
surface resources in conjunction with mining operations on NFS lands as 
set forth under 36 CFR part 228. These regulations require that the 
Forest Service respond to parties who submit proposed mining plans for 
approval to conduct mining operations on or otherwise use NFS lands in 
conjunction with mining for part or all of their planned actions. In 
accordance with regulations at 36 CFR 228.5, the submittal of the 
proposed MPO by PVMC requires the Forest Service to consider whether to 
approve the proposed MPO or to require changes or additions deemed 
necessary to meet the purpose of the regulations for locatable mineral 
operations at 36 CFR part 228, subpart A. Forest Service cannot 
categorically prohibit mining operations that are reasonably incident 
to mining of locatable minerals on NFS lands in the area of the 
proposed action.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action is to approve the MPO as submitted by PVMC. 
Pinto Valley Mine expansion would affect federal lands administered by 
TNF and private lands owned by PVMC. The proposed action by the Forest 
Service would only approve mining operations on NFS lands, since the 
Forest Service does not have jurisdiction to regulate mining operations 
that occur on private land. However, the EIS will consider and disclose 
environmental effects associated with the MPO. Connected actions 
related to the MPO and potential amendment of the forest plan, if 
required, would be analyzed in the EIS. Impacts from past, present, and 
reasonably foreseeable future actions will be considered in combination 
with impacts of the proposed project to estimate potential cumulative 
impacts.

Existing and Proposed Mining Operations

    Pinto Valley Mine is an existing open pit copper and molybdenum 
mine with adjacent milling and processing operations, tailings disposal 
areas, and waste rock disposal, all operated by PVMC. The majority of 
Pinto Valley Mine is located on PVMC property. However, certain 
facilities and operations are located on TNF, and were authorized by 
the Forest Service or the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management (BLM) through Rights-of-Way, Plans of Operations, Special 
Use Permits, and a Letter Agreement. The authorizations date from as 
early as the 1940s, and have been amended, updated, and re-authorized 
over the years.
    Existing surface disturbance associated with the Pinto Valley Mine 
currently encompasses an estimated 3,845 acres, of which 3,389 acres 
are on private and 456 acres are on NFS lands. The proposed disturbance 
acreage would be an additional 1,011 acres of surface disturbance (766 
acres on private land, 245 acres on NFS lands) for a total estimated 
surface disturbance of 4,856 acres (4,155 on private land, 701 acres on 
NFS lands).
    Each of the past, present, and proposed future uses of NFS lands is 
addressed in the MPO. Existing or proposed mining use of NFS lands 
includes portions of the Open Pit, 19 Dump, portions of three tailings 
storage facilities, transportation on Forest Roads and temporary access 
roads, use of existing powerlines and water pipelines, existing water 
supply, stormwater management facilities, and a sign.
    In summary, at the end of the current planned life of the mine, 
PVMC would use approximately 701 acres of NFS lands and 42.45 miles of 
Forest Roads and temporary access roads to access mine facilities and/
or as alignments for linear utility infrastructure.

Possible Alternatives

    The Pinto Valley Mine EIS will analyze the No Action Alternative, 
which would not approve of the proposed MPO. For the No Action 
Alternative, mining operations, reclamation, and closure would continue 
under current authorizations. The responsible official does not have 
discretion to select the No Action alternative, because it would not be 
consistent with requirements of 36 CFR 228.5.
    The EIS may evaluate additional alternatives that could include 
application of design features and other measures that address issues 
identified during scoping, that would meet the purpose and need for the 
project, and are reasonable and practicable. These alternatives may 
require changes to the proposed MPO, which are necessary to meet Forest 
Service regulations for locatable minerals set forth at 36 CFR part 
228, subpart A.

Lead and Cooperating Agencies

    The Forest Service will be the lead agency preparing the EIS. 
Cooperating agencies have not yet been confirmed, but may include 
agencies within the Department of the Interior, as well as other state 
and Federal agencies with regulatory and/or enforcement jurisdiction 
over the project.

Responsible Official

    The Forest Supervisor of the TNF will be the responsible official 
who prepares the Record of Decision (ROD) and approves the MPO.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    TNF Forest Supervisor will consider beneficial and adverse impacts 
of each alternative analyzed in the EIS. TNF Forest Supervisor has 
discretion to determine whether changes in the proposed MPO will be 
required prior to approval.

Plan of Operations

    Using the analysis in the EIS and supporting documentation, the TNF 
Forest Supervisor will make the following decisions regarding the 
proposed MPO:
    1. Decide whether to approve the proposed MPO submitted by PVMC, or 
require changes in, or additions to, the proposed MPO to meet the 
purpose of the regulations, including those for environmental 
protection and reclamation set forth at 36 CFR part 228, subpart A 
before approving a final MPO. The alternative that is selected for 
approval in the final MPO must minimize adverse impacts on NFS surface 
resources where feasible.
    2. If Forest Service determines that any amendment(s) is (are) 
required to the Forest Plan, then decide whether to approve amendments 
to the Forest Plan,

[[Page 15324]]

which would be necessary to approve the final MPO.

Final EIS and Record of Decision

    The Forest Supervisor plans to release a draft ROD in conjunction 
with the final EIS. The draft ROD would address the decision on 
approval of the MPO. The decision would be subject to 36 CFR part 218, 
Project-Level Pre-decisional Administrative Review Process. If forest 
plan amendments are required, then the draft decision may also be 
subject to 36 CFR part 219, subpart B, Pre-decisional Administrative 
Review Process.
    Following resolution of objections to the draft ROD, a final ROD 
would be issued. PVMC would have an opportunity to appeal the decision 
as set forth at 36 CFR part 214, Postdecisional Administrative Review 
Process for Occupancy or Use of National Forest System Lands and 
Resources.
    Prior to approval of the MPO, PVMC may be required to modify the 
proposed MPO to align it with the description of the selected 
alternative in the final ROD. In addition, the TNF Forest Supervisor 
would require PVMC to submit a reclamation bond or other acceptable 
financial assurance to ensure that NFS lands and resources involved 
with the mining operation are reclaimed in accordance with the approved 
MPO and Forest Service requirements for environmental protection (36 
CFR 228.8 and 228.13). After the Forest Service has determined that the 
MPO conforms to the ROD and that the reclamation bond is acceptable, 
the TNF Forest Supervisor would approve the MPO. Implementation of 
mining operations that affect NFS lands and resources may not commence 
until the MPO is approved and the reclamation bond or other financial 
assurance is in place.

Preliminary Issues

    Issues to be analyzed in the EIS will be developed during the 
scoping process. Preliminary issues expected to be analyzed include 
potential impacts to: Groundwater and surface water quantity and 
quality; riparian and aquatic areas and springs; biological resources, 
including threatened and endangered species and Forest Service 
sensitive species; historical and cultural resources; air quality; 
socioeconomics; transportation and traffic; noise; visual resources; 
and recreation. This list is subject to change based on comments 
received from the public and resource agencies.

Permits or Licenses Required

    The following is a list of permits for Pinto Valley Mine: Permits 
associated with groundwater withdrawal and dam safety permits (Arizona 
Department of Water Resources); air quality Class II synthetic minor 
permit (Arizona Department of Environmental Quality), Arizona Pollutant 
Discharge Elimination System process and stormwater permits, Aquifer 
Protection Permit, and public water supply permit (Arizona Department 
of Environmental Quality); Mined Land Reclamation Plan (Arizona State 
Mine Inspector); letter agreement for a commercial vehicle staging area 
(Arizona Department of Transportation); and other required permits. 
Because the Pinto Valley Mine is an operating mine, PVMC already holds 
required permits. PVMC would update and amend permits for additional 
activities proposed in the MPO, as required.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides 
the development of the Pinto Valley Mine EIS. Public comments may be 
submitted to TNF in a variety of ways, including: By email, via the 
project Web site, by mail, and by facsimile. In addition, TNF will 
conduct two open houses during the scoping process through which 
members of the public can learn about the proposed action and the NEPA 
review process, and submit comments. Comments sought by TNF include 
specific comments related to the proposed action, appropriate 
information that could be pertinent to the description of baseline 
resource conditions and analysis of environmental effects, 
identification of significant issues, identification of reasonably 
foreseeable actions that should be considered in the cumulative 
analysis, and identification of potential design features and 
alternatives.
    Written comments may be sent to: Pinto Valley Mine EIS Comments, 
2324 E McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85006. Comments may also be sent by 
email to: [email protected], or sent by facsimile to (602) 
225-5302.
    It is important that reviewers provide comments at such times and 
in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of the 
environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided 
prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate 
the reviewer's concerns and contentions and specific recommendations 
wherever possible. When submitting comments, please keep them specific 
to this proposal only. Comments which are not specific to the project 
and project area will be deemed outside the scope of the analysis and 
will not be considered. If you are including references, citations, or 
additional information to be considered for this project, please 
provide a copy and specify exactly how the material relates to the 
project. Also indicate exactly what part of the material you would like 
us to consider (such as page or figure number). Comments received in 
response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those 
who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed 
action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; 
however, anonymous comments will not provide the agency with the 
ability to provide the respondent with subsequent environmental 
documents.

     Dated: March 21, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017-06020 Filed 3-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P



                                                15322                         Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 28, 2017 / Notices

                                                and must be treated in accordance with                  Health Protection). After OMB approves                DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
                                                the regulations.                                        this combined information collection
                                                   As part of its swine health protection               package (0579–0065), APHIS will retire                Forest Service
                                                program, APHIS conducts a                               OMB control number 0579–0137.
                                                pseudorabies (PRV) eradication program                                                                        Tonto National Forest; Gila County,
                                                                                                           We are asking OMB to approve our                   AZ; Pinto Valley Mine Environmental
                                                in cooperation with State governments,                  use of these information collection
                                                swine producers, swine shippers, herd                                                                         Impact Statement
                                                                                                        activities, as described, for an additional
                                                owners, and accredited veterinarians.                   3 years.                                              AGENCY:  Forest Service, USDA.
                                                The program identifies PRV-affected                                                                           ACTION:  Notice of intent to prepare an
                                                swine, provides herd management                            The purpose of this notice is to solicit
                                                                                                        comments from the public (as well as                  environmental impact statement for
                                                techniques, and has eliminated PRV in                                                                         approval of a mining plan of operations
                                                commercial production herds. However,                   affected agencies) concerning our
                                                                                                        information collection. These comments                for the Pinto Valley Mine, notice of
                                                APHIS periodically finds infected swine                                                                       public scoping, and request for scoping
                                                when swine are exposed to feral swine                   will help us:
                                                                                                           (1) Evaluate whether the collection of             comments.
                                                or other swine that have had exposure
                                                to feral swine.                                         information is necessary for the proper               SUMMARY:   The Tonto National Forest
                                                   The regulations in 9 CFR parts 71 and                performance of the functions of the                   (TNF) is preparing an Environmental
                                                85 facilitate the PRV eradication                       Agency, including whether the                         Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate and
                                                program and general swine health by                     information will have practical utility;              disclose the potential environmental
                                                providing requirements for moving                          (2) Evaluate the accuracy of our                   effects from approval of the Mining Plan
                                                swine interstate within a swine                         estimate of the burden of the collection              of Operations (MPO) submitted by Pinto
                                                production system. (A production                        of information, including the validity of             Valley Mining Corp. (PVMC), for
                                                system consists of separate farms that                  the methodology and assumptions used;                 operations on National Forest System
                                                each specialize in a different phase of                    (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and              (NFS) land associated with expansion of
                                                swine production such as sow herds,                     clarity of the information to be                      an existing open pit copper and
                                                nursery herds, and finishing herds.                     collected; and                                        molybdenum mine, the Pinto Valley
                                                These separate farms, all members of the                                                                      Mine. An amendment to the Tonto
                                                same production system, may be located                     (4) Minimize the burden of the
                                                                                                                                                              National Forest Land and Resource
                                                in more than one State.)                                collection of information on those who
                                                                                                                                                              Management Plan (Forest Plan, 1985, as
                                                   The regulations for the feeding of                   are to respond, through use, as
                                                                                                                                                              amended) may be required.
                                                garbage to swine and for the PRV                        appropriate, of automated, electronic,
                                                                                                                                                              DATES: Comments concerning the scope
                                                eradication program require the use of a                mechanical, and other collection
                                                                                                        technologies; e.g., permitting electronic             of the analysis must be received no later
                                                number of information collection                                                                              than April 27, 2017. Public scoping
                                                activities, including the creation of food              submission of responses.
                                                                                                                                                              meetings will be held on April 18 at
                                                waste reports; the completion of                           Estimate of burden: The public                     Superior Junior/Senior High School, 100
                                                applications to operate garbage                         reporting burden for this collection of               Mary Drive, Superior, Arizona and April
                                                treatment facilities and                                information is estimated to average 1.89              20 at Miami Junior/Senior High School,
                                                acknowledgement of the Act and                          hours per response.                                   4739 S. Ragus Rd., Miami, Arizona from
                                                regulations; garbage treatment facility                    Respondents: Owners/operators                      5:00 to 8:00 p.m.
                                                inspection; cancellation of license by                  (licensees) of garbage treatment                      ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
                                                State animal health officials; request for              facilities, herd owners, food
                                                a hearing; cancellation of license by                                                                         Pinto Valley Mine EIS Comments, 2324
                                                                                                        establishments, accredited                            E McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85006.
                                                licensee; notification by licensee of sick              veterinarians, and State animal health
                                                or dead animals; notification by licensee                                                                     Comments may also be sent via email to
                                                                                                        authorities.                                          Comment@pintovalleymineeis.us, or via
                                                of changes to name, address, or
                                                                                                           Estimated annual number of                         facsimile to (602) 225–5302, ATTN:
                                                management; swine health protection
                                                program inspection summary; permit to                   respondents: 27,050.                                  Pinto Valley Mine EIS Comments.
                                                move restricted animals; owner-shipper                     Estimated annual number of                         Written and oral comments may also be
                                                statement; certificate of veterinary                    responses per respondent: 31.55.                      submitted during scoping meetings that
                                                inspection; accredited veterinarian’s                      Estimated annual number of                         will be held by the U.S. Forest Service
                                                statement; embryo and semen                             responses: 853,318.                                   (Forest Service) on April 18 and 20.
                                                shipments; identification for swine                                                                           Additional details may be found at the
                                                                                                           Estimated total annual burden on
                                                moving interstate; swine production                                                                           Pinto Valley Mine EIS Web site at
                                                                                                        respondents: 1,614,460 hours. (Due to
                                                system health plan; interstate movement                                                                       http://www.pintovalleymineeis.us.
                                                                                                        averaging, the total annual burden hours
                                                report and notification; cancellation or                                                                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judd
                                                                                                        may not equal the product of the annual
                                                withdrawal of a swine production                        number of responses multiplied by the                 Sampson, Interim Project Manager, at
                                                system health plan; appeal of                           reporting burden per response.)                       602–225–5272 or juddsampson@
                                                cancellation of a swine production                                                                            fs.fed.us during normal business hours.
                                                                                                           All responses to this notice will be               Individuals who use telecommunication
                                                system health plan; shipment to                         summarized and included in the request
                                                slaughter seal; appraisal and indemnity                                                                       devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
                                                                                                        for OMB approval. All comments will                   Federal Information Relay Service
                                                claim form; report of net salvage                       also become a matter of public record.                (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                proceeds; herd management plans; and
                                                recordkeeping.                                            Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of            a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
                                                   The information collection                           March 2017.                                           through Friday.
                                                requirements above are currently                        Jere L. Dick,                                         SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PVMC
                                                approved by the Office of Management                    Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant                submitted the proposed MPO for
                                                and Budget (OMB) under OMB control                      Health Inspection Service.                            approval by the Forest Service in May
                                                numbers 0579–0137 (Swine Health                         [FR Doc. 2017–06217 Filed 3–27–17; 8:45 am]           2016. The proposed MPO was submitted
                                                Protection) and 0579–0065 (Swine                        BILLING CODE 3410–34–P                                in accordance with Forest Service


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:14 Mar 27, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00009   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM   28MRN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 28, 2017 / Notices                                           15323

                                                regulations for locatable minerals set                  mining operations that occur on private               Alternative, mining operations,
                                                forth at Title 36 of the Code of Federal                land. However, the EIS will consider                  reclamation, and closure would
                                                Regulations (CFR), part 228 (36 CFR part                and disclose environmental effects                    continue under current authorizations.
                                                228), subpart A, Locatable Minerals.                    associated with the MPO. Connected                    The responsible official does not have
                                                   The proposed action would                            actions related to the MPO and potential              discretion to select the No Action
                                                consolidate prior permitted activities                  amendment of the forest plan, if                      alternative, because it would not be
                                                reasonably incident to extraction,                      required, would be analyzed in the EIS.               consistent with requirements of 36 CFR
                                                transportation, and processing of copper                Impacts from past, present, and                       228.5.
                                                and molybdenum on NFS lands and                         reasonably foreseeable future actions                    The EIS may evaluate additional
                                                expand existing mining operations from                  will be considered in combination with                alternatives that could include
                                                private lands on to NFS lands primarily                 impacts of the proposed project to                    application of design features and other
                                                for tailings disposal and pit expansion.                estimate potential cumulative impacts.                measures that address issues identified
                                                Purpose and Need for Action                             Existing and Proposed Mining                          during scoping, that would meet the
                                                                                                        Operations                                            purpose and need for the project, and
                                                   The purpose of this project is to
                                                                                                                                                              are reasonable and practicable. These
                                                analyze the proposed action as required                    Pinto Valley Mine is an existing open              alternatives may require changes to the
                                                by the regulations at 36 CFR 228.5(a).                  pit copper and molybdenum mine with                   proposed MPO, which are necessary to
                                                Approval of the proposed MPO would                      adjacent milling and processing                       meet Forest Service regulations for
                                                be a major federal action subject to                    operations, tailings disposal areas, and              locatable minerals set forth at 36 CFR
                                                National Environmental Policy Act of                    waste rock disposal, all operated by                  part 228, subpart A.
                                                1969 (NEPA). Accordingly, the Forest                    PVMC. The majority of Pinto Valley
                                                Service must prepare an EIS to identify                 Mine is located on PVMC property.                     Lead and Cooperating Agencies
                                                the scope of issues associated with the                 However, certain facilities and                         The Forest Service will be the lead
                                                MPO, identify and assess reasonable                     operations are located on TNF, and were               agency preparing the EIS. Cooperating
                                                alternatives to the MPO in order to                     authorized by the Forest Service or the
                                                avoid or minimize adverse effects of                                                                          agencies have not yet been confirmed,
                                                                                                        U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of                but may include agencies within the
                                                MPO actions and evaluate and disclose                   Land Management (BLM) through
                                                the potential environmental effects. An                                                                       Department of the Interior, as well as
                                                                                                        Rights-of-Way, Plans of Operations,                   other state and Federal agencies with
                                                amendment to the Tonto National Forest                  Special Use Permits, and a Letter
                                                Land and Resource Management Plan                                                                             regulatory and/or enforcement
                                                                                                        Agreement. The authorizations date                    jurisdiction over the project.
                                                (Forest Plan, 1985, as amended) may be                  from as early as the 1940s, and have
                                                required.                                               been amended, updated, and re-                        Responsible Official
                                                   The need for this project is to comply               authorized over the years.
                                                with the regulations of the Forest                                                                              The Forest Supervisor of the TNF will
                                                                                                           Existing surface disturbance
                                                Service, Department of Agriculture, that                                                                      be the responsible official who prepares
                                                                                                        associated with the Pinto Valley Mine
                                                govern the use of surface resources in                                                                        the Record of Decision (ROD) and
                                                                                                        currently encompasses an estimated
                                                conjunction with mining operations on                                                                         approves the MPO.
                                                                                                        3,845 acres, of which 3,389 acres are on
                                                NFS lands as set forth under 36 CFR                     private and 456 acres are on NFS lands.               Nature of Decision To Be Made
                                                part 228. These regulations require that                The proposed disturbance acreage
                                                the Forest Service respond to parties                                                                            TNF Forest Supervisor will consider
                                                                                                        would be an additional 1,011 acres of
                                                who submit proposed mining plans for                                                                          beneficial and adverse impacts of each
                                                                                                        surface disturbance (766 acres on
                                                approval to conduct mining operations                                                                         alternative analyzed in the EIS. TNF
                                                                                                        private land, 245 acres on NFS lands)
                                                on or otherwise use NFS lands in                                                                              Forest Supervisor has discretion to
                                                                                                        for a total estimated surface disturbance
                                                conjunction with mining for part or all                                                                       determine whether changes in the
                                                                                                        of 4,856 acres (4,155 on private land,
                                                of their planned actions. In accordance                                                                       proposed MPO will be required prior to
                                                                                                        701 acres on NFS lands).
                                                with regulations at 36 CFR 228.5, the                      Each of the past, present, and                     approval.
                                                submittal of the proposed MPO by                        proposed future uses of NFS lands is                  Plan of Operations
                                                PVMC requires the Forest Service to                     addressed in the MPO. Existing or
                                                consider whether to approve the                         proposed mining use of NFS lands                        Using the analysis in the EIS and
                                                proposed MPO or to require changes or                   includes portions of the Open Pit, 19                 supporting documentation, the TNF
                                                additions deemed necessary to meet the                  Dump, portions of three tailings storage              Forest Supervisor will make the
                                                purpose of the regulations for locatable                facilities, transportation on Forest Roads            following decisions regarding the
                                                mineral operations at 36 CFR part 228,                  and temporary access roads, use of                    proposed MPO:
                                                subpart A. Forest Service cannot                        existing powerlines and water pipelines,                1. Decide whether to approve the
                                                categorically prohibit mining operations                existing water supply, stormwater                     proposed MPO submitted by PVMC, or
                                                that are reasonably incident to mining of               management facilities, and a sign.                    require changes in, or additions to, the
                                                locatable minerals on NFS lands in the                     In summary, at the end of the current              proposed MPO to meet the purpose of
                                                area of the proposed action.                            planned life of the mine, PVMC would                  the regulations, including those for
                                                                                                        use approximately 701 acres of NFS                    environmental protection and
                                                Proposed Action                                                                                               reclamation set forth at 36 CFR part 228,
                                                                                                        lands and 42.45 miles of Forest Roads
                                                  The proposed action is to approve the                 and temporary access roads to access                  subpart A before approving a final MPO.
                                                MPO as submitted by PVMC. Pinto                                                                               The alternative that is selected for
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                        mine facilities and/or as alignments for
                                                Valley Mine expansion would affect                      linear utility infrastructure.                        approval in the final MPO must
                                                federal lands administered by TNF and                                                                         minimize adverse impacts on NFS
                                                private lands owned by PVMC. The                        Possible Alternatives                                 surface resources where feasible.
                                                proposed action by the Forest Service                     The Pinto Valley Mine EIS will                        2. If Forest Service determines that
                                                would only approve mining operations                    analyze the No Action Alternative,                    any amendment(s) is (are) required to
                                                on NFS lands, since the Forest Service                  which would not approve of the                        the Forest Plan, then decide whether to
                                                does not have jurisdiction to regulate                  proposed MPO. For the No Action                       approve amendments to the Forest Plan,


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:14 Mar 27, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00010   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM   28MRN1


                                                15324                         Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 28, 2017 / Notices

                                                which would be necessary to approve                     with groundwater withdrawal and dam                   including references, citations, or
                                                the final MPO.                                          safety permits (Arizona Department of                 additional information to be considered
                                                                                                        Water Resources); air quality Class II                for this project, please provide a copy
                                                Final EIS and Record of Decision
                                                                                                        synthetic minor permit (Arizona                       and specify exactly how the material
                                                   The Forest Supervisor plans to release               Department of Environmental Quality),                 relates to the project. Also indicate
                                                a draft ROD in conjunction with the                     Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination               exactly what part of the material you
                                                final EIS. The draft ROD would address                  System process and stormwater permits,                would like us to consider (such as page
                                                the decision on approval of the MPO.                    Aquifer Protection Permit, and public                 or figure number). Comments received
                                                The decision would be subject to 36                     water supply permit (Arizona                          in response to this solicitation,
                                                CFR part 218, Project-Level Pre-                        Department of Environmental Quality);                 including names and addresses of those
                                                decisional Administrative Review                        Mined Land Reclamation Plan (Arizona                  who comment, will be part of the public
                                                Process. If forest plan amendments are                  State Mine Inspector); letter agreement               record for this proposed action.
                                                required, then the draft decision may                   for a commercial vehicle staging area                 Comments submitted anonymously will
                                                also be subject to 36 CFR part 219,                     (Arizona Department of Transportation);               be accepted and considered; however,
                                                subpart B, Pre-decisional Administrative                and other required permits. Because the               anonymous comments will not provide
                                                Review Process.                                         Pinto Valley Mine is an operating mine,               the agency with the ability to provide
                                                   Following resolution of objections to                PVMC already holds required permits.                  the respondent with subsequent
                                                the draft ROD, a final ROD would be                     PVMC would update and amend                           environmental documents.
                                                issued. PVMC would have an                              permits for additional activities                       Dated: March 21, 2017.
                                                opportunity to appeal the decision as set               proposed in the MPO, as required.                     Jeanne M. Higgins,
                                                forth at 36 CFR part 214, Postdecisional
                                                Administrative Review Process for                       Scoping Process                                       Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
                                                                                                                                                              System.
                                                Occupancy or Use of National Forest                       This notice of intent initiates the
                                                                                                        scoping process, which guides the                     [FR Doc. 2017–06020 Filed 3–27–17; 8:45 am]
                                                System Lands and Resources.
                                                   Prior to approval of the MPO, PVMC                   development of the Pinto Valley Mine                  BILLING CODE 3411–15–P

                                                may be required to modify the proposed                  EIS. Public comments may be submitted
                                                MPO to align it with the description of                 to TNF in a variety of ways, including:
                                                the selected alternative in the final ROD.              By email, via the project Web site, by                DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
                                                In addition, the TNF Forest Supervisor                  mail, and by facsimile. In addition, TNF              Rural Utilities Service
                                                would require PVMC to submit a                          will conduct two open houses during
                                                reclamation bond or other acceptable                    the scoping process through which                     Information Collection Activity;
                                                financial assurance to ensure that NFS                  members of the public can learn about                 Comment Request
                                                lands and resources involved with the                   the proposed action and the NEPA
                                                mining operation are reclaimed in                       review process, and submit comments.                        Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
                                                                                                                                                              AGENCY:
                                                accordance with the approved MPO and                    Comments sought by TNF include                              Notice and request for
                                                                                                                                                              ACTION:
                                                Forest Service requirements for                         specific comments related to the                      comments.
                                                environmental protection (36 CFR 228.8                  proposed action, appropriate
                                                                                                                                                              SUMMARY:  In accordance with the
                                                and 228.13). After the Forest Service has               information that could be pertinent to
                                                                                                                                                              Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
                                                determined that the MPO conforms to                     the description of baseline resource
                                                                                                                                                              United States Department of
                                                the ROD and that the reclamation bond                   conditions and analysis of
                                                                                                                                                              Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service
                                                is acceptable, the TNF Forest Supervisor                environmental effects, identification of
                                                                                                                                                              (RUS) invites comments on this
                                                would approve the MPO.                                  significant issues, identification of
                                                                                                                                                              information collection for which
                                                Implementation of mining operations                     reasonably foreseeable actions that
                                                                                                                                                              approval from the Office of Management
                                                that affect NFS lands and resources may                 should be considered in the cumulative
                                                                                                                                                              and Budget (OMB) will be requested.
                                                not commence until the MPO is                           analysis, and identification of potential
                                                                                                        design features and alternatives.                     DATES: Comments on this notice must be
                                                approved and the reclamation bond or                                                                          received by May 30, 2017.
                                                other financial assurance is in place.                    Written comments may be sent to:
                                                                                                        Pinto Valley Mine EIS Comments, 2324                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                Preliminary Issues                                      E McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85006.                    Thomas P. Dickson, Acting Director,
                                                   Issues to be analyzed in the EIS will                Comments may also be sent by email to:                Program Development and Regulatory
                                                be developed during the scoping                         Comment@pintovalleymineeis.us, or                     Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, 1400
                                                process. Preliminary issues expected to                 sent by facsimile to (602) 225–5302.                  Independence Avenue SW., STOP 1522,
                                                be analyzed include potential impacts                     It is important that reviewers provide              Room 5164 South Building,
                                                to: Groundwater and surface water                       comments at such times and in such                    Washington, DC 20250–1522.
                                                quantity and quality; riparian and                      manner that they are useful to the                    Telephone: (202) 690–4492. Email:
                                                aquatic areas and springs; biological                   agency’s preparation of the                           thomas.dickson@wdc.usda.gov.
                                                resources, including threatened and                     environmental impact statement.                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
                                                endangered species and Forest Service                   Therefore, comments should be                         of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
                                                sensitive species; historical and cultural              provided prior to the close of the                    regulation (5 CFR part 1320)
                                                resources; air quality; socioeconomics;                 comment period and should clearly                     implementing provisions of the
                                                transportation and traffic; noise; visual               articulate the reviewer’s concerns and                Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
                                                                                                        contentions and specific                              L. 104–13) requires that interested
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                resources; and recreation. This list is
                                                subject to change based on comments                     recommendations wherever possible.                    members of the public and affected
                                                received from the public and resource                   When submitting comments, please                      agencies have an opportunity to
                                                agencies.                                               keep them specific to this proposal only.             comment on information collection and
                                                                                                        Comments which are not specific to the                recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR
                                                Permits or Licenses Required                            project and project area will be deemed               1320.8(d)). This notice identifies an
                                                  The following is a list of permits for                outside the scope of the analysis and                 information collection that RUS is
                                                Pinto Valley Mine: Permits associated                   will not be considered. If you are                    submitting to OMB for approval.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:14 Mar 27, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00011   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM   28MRN1



Document Created: 2017-03-28 00:32:03
Document Modified: 2017-03-28 00:32:03
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for approval of a mining plan of operations for the Pinto Valley Mine, notice of public scoping, and request for scoping comments.
DatesComments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received no later than April 27, 2017. Public scoping meetings will be held on April 18 at Superior Junior/Senior High School, 100 Mary Drive, Superior, Arizona and April 20 at Miami Junior/Senior High School, 4739 S. Ragus Rd., Miami, Arizona from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m.
ContactJudd Sampson, Interim Project Manager, at 602-225-5272 or [email protected] during normal business hours. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
FR Citation82 FR 15322 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR