82 FR 16349 - Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate From Japan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 63 (April 4, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 63 (April 4, 2017)
| Page Range | 16349-16351 | |
| FR Document | 2017-06629 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 4, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 16349-16351] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-06629] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-875] Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate From Japan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL plate) from Japan is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. The final weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are listed below in the ``Final Determination'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective April 4, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kabir Archuletta or Ryan Mullen, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2593 and (202) 482-5260, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 14, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Determination of sales at LTFV of CTL plate from Japan.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since the Department published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Japan: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 79427 (November 14, 2016) (Preliminary Determination). \2\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than- Fair-Value Investigation of Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- Length Plate from Japan,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The scope of the investigation covers CTL plate from Japan. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix I. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix II. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B-8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), in November and December 2016, we verified the sales and cost information submitted by Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Tokyo Steel) for use in our final determination. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original source documents provided by Tokyo Steel.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ For discussion of our verification findings, see the following memoranda: Memorandum to the File through Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, Office V, from Kabir Archuletta, Senior International Trade Analyst, and Ryan Mullen, International Trade Analyst, entitled ``Verification of Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Japan,'' dated January 17, 2017; Memorandum to the File through Neal M. Halper, Director, Office of Accounting and Michael P. Martin, Lead Accountant, Office of Accounting from Kristin L. Case, Senior Accountant, entitled ``Verification of the Cost Response of Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. in the Less-Than-Fair Value Investigation of Certain Alloy and Carbon Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Japan,'' dated January 9, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for Tokyo Steel. For a discussion of these changes, see the ``Margin Calculations'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Adverse Facts Available In the Preliminary Determination, because mandatory respondents JFE Steel Corporation (JFE) and Shimabun Corporation (Shimabun) failed to respond to the Department's questionnaire and informed the Department that they would not participate in this investigation,\4\ we applied adverse facts available (AFA) to these respondents, in accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.308. Because we could not corroborate the petition dumping margin of 179.2 percent, we assigned to JFE and Shimabun, as AFA, a dumping margin based on the highest transaction-specific dumping margin calculated for Tokyo Steel.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from JFE ``Advisement of Non-Participation in Investigation'' (June 20, 2016); Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from Shimabun ``Shimabun's Notification of Non-Participation'' (July 29, 2016). \5\ See Preliminary Determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department received no comments regarding its preliminary application of the AFA dumping margin to JFE and Shimabun. For the final [[Page 16350]] determination, the Department has not altered its analysis or its decision to apply the AFA dumping margin to JFE and Shimabun. In making this final determination, the Department relied, in part, on facts available for Tokyo Steel. Furthermore, because Tokyo Steel did not act to the best of its ability in responding to certain of the Department's requests for information, we drew an adverse inference, where appropriate, in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\6\ For further information, see the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All-Others Rate Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated all- others rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. Tokyo Steel is the only respondent for which the Department calculated a company-specific margin. Therefore, for purposes of determining the ``all-others'' rate and pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we are using the dumping margin calculated for Tokyo Steel, as referenced in the ``Final Determination'' section below. Final Determination The final weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/manufacturer dumping margins (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.......................... 14.79 JFE Steel Corporation....................................... 48.67 Shimabun Corporation........................................ 48.67 All Others.................................................. 14.79 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of CTL plate from Japan, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after November 14, 2016, the date of publication of the preliminary determination of this investigation in the Federal Register. Further, the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the estimated amount by which the normal value exceeds the U.S. price as shown above. International Trade Comission (ITC) Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the ITC of the final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of CTL plate from Japan no later than 45 days after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APO) This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This determination and this notice are issued and published pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: March 29, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The products covered by this investigation are certain carbon and alloy steel hot-rolled or forged flat plate products not in coils, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances (cut-to-length plate). Subject merchandise includes plate that is produced by being cut-to-length from coils or from other discrete length plate and plate that is rolled or forged into a discrete length. The products covered include (1) Universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness of not less than 4 mm, which are not in coils and without patterns in relief), and (2) hot- rolled or forged flat steel products of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness, and which are not in coils, whether or not with patterns in relief. The covered products described above may be rectangular, square, circular or other shapes and include products of either rectangular or non-rectangular cross-section where such non-rectangular cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been ``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced above, the following rules apply: (1) Except where otherwise stated where the nominal and actual thickness or width measurements vary, a product from a given subject country is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth above unless the product is already covered by an order existing on that specific country (i.e., Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 2016).); and (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product (e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross- section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies. Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less by weight. Subject merchandise includes cut-to-length plate that has been further processed in the subject country or a third country, including but not limited to pickling, oiling, levelling, annealing, tempering, temper rolling, skin passing, painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching, beveling, and/or slitting, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the cut-to-length plate. All products that meet the written physical description, are within the scope of this [[Page 16351]] investigation unless specifically excluded or covered by the scope of an existing order. The following products are outside of, and/or specifically excluded from, the scope of this investigation: (1) Products clad, plated, or coated with metal, whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastic or other non-metallic substances; (2) military grade armor plate certified to one of the following specifications or to a specification that references and incorporates one of the following specifications:MIL-A-12560, MIL-DTL-12560H, MIL-DTL-12560J, MIL-DTL-12560K, MIL-DTL-32332, MIL-A-46100D, MIL-DTL-46100-E, MIL-46177C, MIL-S-16216K Grade HY80, MIL-S-16216K Grade HY100, MIL-S-24645A HSLA-80; MIL-S-24645A HSLA-100, T9074-BD-GIB-010/0300 Grade HY80, T9074-BD-GIB-010/0300 Grade HY100, T9074-BD-GIB-010/0300 Grade HSLA80, T9074-BD-GIB-010/0300 Grade HSLA100, and T9074-BD-GIB-010/0300 Mod. Grade HSLA115, except that any cut-to-length plate certified to one of the above specifications, or to a military grade armor specification that references and incorporates one of the above specifications, will not be excluded from the scope if it is also dual- or multiple- certified to any other non-armor specification that otherwise would fall within the scope of this investigation; (3) stainless steel plate, containing 10.5 percent or more of chromium by weight and not more than 1.2 percent of carbon by weight; (4) CTL plate meeting the requirements of ASTM A-829, Grade E 4340 that are over 305 mm in actual thickness; (5) Alloy forged and rolled CTL plate greater than or equal to 152.4 mm in actual thickness meeting each of the following requirements: (a) Electric furnace melted, ladle refined & vacuum degassed and having a chemical composition (expressed in weight percentages): Carbon 0.23-0.28, Silicon 0.05-0.20, Manganese 1.20-1.60, Nickel not greater than 1.0, Sulfur not greater than 0.007, Phosphorus not greater than 0.020, Chromium 1.0-2.5, Molybdenum 0.35-0.80, Boron 0.002-0.004, Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm, Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm; (b) With a Brinell hardness measured in all parts of the product including mid thickness falling within one of the following ranges: (i) 270-300 HBW, (ii) 290-320 HBW, or (iii) 320-350 HBW; (c) Having cleanliness in accordance with ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A not exceeding 1.5, B not exceeding 1.0, C not exceeding 0.5, D not exceeding 1.5; and (d) Conforming to ASTM A578-S9 ultrasonic testing requirements with acceptance criteria 2 mm flat bottom hole; (6) Alloy forged and rolled steel CTL plate over 407 mm in actual thickness and meeting the following requirements: (a) Made from Electric Arc Furnace melted, Ladle refined & vacuum degassed, alloy steel with the following chemical composition (expressed in weight percentages): Carbon 0.23-0.28, Silicon 0.05-0.15, Manganese 1.20-1.50, Nickel not greater than 0.4, Sulfur not greater than 0.010, Phosphorus not greater than 0.020, Chromium 1.20-1.50, Molybdenum 0.35-0.55, Boron 0.002-0.004, Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm, Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm; (b) Having cleanliness in accordance with ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A not exceeding 1.5, B not exceeding 1.5, C not exceeding 1.0, D not exceeding 1.5; (c) Having the following mechanical properties: (i) With a Brinell hardness not more than 237 HBW measured in all parts of the product including mid thickness; and having a Yield Strength of 75ksi min and UTS 95ksi or more, Elongation of 18% or more and Reduction of area 35% or more; having charpy V at -75 degrees F in the longitudinal direction equal or greater than 15 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater than 20 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens) and conforming to the requirements of NACE MR01-75; or (ii) With a Brinell hardness not less than 240 HBW measured in all parts of the product including mid thickness; and having a Yield Strength of 90 ksi min and UTS 110 ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more and Reduction of area 30% or more; having charpy V at -40 degrees F in the longitudinal direction equal or greater than 21 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater than 31 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens); (d) Conforming to ASTM A578-S9 ultrasonic testing requirements with acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole; and (e) Conforming to magnetic particle inspection in accordance with AMS 2301; (7) Alloy forged and rolled steel CTL plate over 407 mm in actual thickness and meeting the following requirements: (a) Made from Electric Arc Furnace melted, ladle refined & vacuum degassed, alloy steel with the following chemical composition (expressed in weight percentages): Carbon 0.25-0.30, Silicon not greater than 0.25, Manganese not greater than 0.50, Nickel 3.0-3.5, Sulfur not greater than 0.010, Phosphorus not greater than 0.020, Chromium 1.0-1.5, Molybdenum 0.6-0.9, Vanadium 0.08 to 0.12 Boron 0.002-0.004, Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm, Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm. (b) Having cleanliness in accordance with ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A not exceeding 1.0(t) and 0.5(h), B not exceeding 1.5(t) and 1.0(h), C not exceeding 1.0(t) and 0.5(h), and D not exceeding 1.5(t) and 1.0(h); (c) Having the following mechanical properties: A Brinell hardness not less than 350 HBW measured in all parts of the product including mid thickness; and having a Yield Strength of 145ksi or more and UTS 160ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more and Reduction of area 35% or more; having charpy V at -40 degrees F in the transverse direction equal or greater than 20 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater than 25 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens); (d) Conforming to ASTM A578-S9 ultrasonic testing requirements with acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole; and (e) Conforming to magnetic particle inspection in accordance with AMS 2301. The products subject to the investigation are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110, 7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 7225.40.3050, 7226.20.0000, and 7226.91.5000. The products subject to the investigation may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.4500, 7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7590, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7214.10.0000, 7214.30.0010, 7214.30.0080, 7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090, 7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.40.5110, 7225.40.5130, 7225.40.5160, 7225.40.7000, 7225.99.0010, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000, 7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000, 7226.91.0500, 7226.91.1530, 7226.91.1560, 7226.91.2530, 7226.91.2560, 7226.91.7000, 7226.91.8000, and 7226.99.0180. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Scope Comments V. Margin Calculations VI. Discussion of Issues a. Comment 1: Unreported Bank Transfer Fees b. Comment 2: Cost Adjustments Based on Verification Findings c. Comment 3: Expenses Identified at Verification VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-06629 Filed 4-3-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Notices 16349
period. Failure to comply with this CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement Verification
requirement could result in the and Compliance, International Trade As provided in section 782(i) of the
Department’s presumption that Administration, U.S. Department of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
reimbursement of antidumping and/or Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue in November and December 2016, we
countervailing duties occurred and the NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: verified the sales and cost information
subsequent assessment of doubled (202) 482–2593 and (202) 482–5260, submitted by Tokyo Steel
antidumping and/or countervailing respectively. Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Tokyo Steel)
duties. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: for use in our final determination. We
Notification Regarding Administrative used standard verification procedures,
Background including an examination of relevant
Protective Order
On November 14, 2016, the accounting and production records, and
This notice serves as a final reminder
Department published the Preliminary original source documents provided by
to parties subject to an administrative
Determination of sales at LTFV of CTL Tokyo Steel.3
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
plate from Japan.1 A summary of the
responsibility concerning the return or Changes Since the Preliminary
events that occurred since the
destruction of proprietary information Determination
Department published the Preliminary
disclosed under an APO in accordance Based on our analysis of the
Determination, as well as a full
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues comments received and our findings at
discussion of the issues raised by parties
to govern business proprietary verification, we made certain changes to
for this final determination, may be
information in this segment of the the margin calculations for Tokyo Steel.
found in the Issues and Decision
proceeding. Timely written notification For a discussion of these changes, see
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
of the return/destruction of APO the ‘‘Margin Calculations’’ section of the
by this notice.2
materials or conversion to judicial Issues and Decision Memorandum.
protective order is hereby requested. Scope of the Investigation
Failure to comply with the regulations Adverse Facts Available
The scope of the investigation covers
and terms of an APO is a violation CTL plate from Japan. For a complete In the Preliminary Determination,
which is subject to sanction. description of the scope of the because mandatory respondents JFE
This notice is issued and published in investigation, see Appendix I. Steel Corporation (JFE) and Shimabun
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and Corporation (Shimabun) failed to
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR Analysis of Comments Received respond to the Department’s
351.213(d)(4). All issues raised in the case and questionnaire and informed the
Date: March 29, 2017. rebuttal briefs by parties in this Department that they would not
Gary Taverman, investigation are addressed in the Issues participate in this investigation,4 we
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for and Decision Memorandum. A list of applied adverse facts available (AFA) to
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty the issues raised is attached to this these respondents, in accordance with
Operations. notice as Appendix II. The Issues and sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act and 19
[FR Doc. 2017–06619 Filed 4–3–17; 8:45 am] Decision Memorandum is a public CFR 351.308. Because we could not
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P document and is on file electronically corroborate the petition dumping
via Enforcement and Compliance’s margin of 179.2 percent, we assigned to
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty JFE and Shimabun, as AFA, a dumping
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Centralized Electronic Service System margin based on the highest transaction-
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to specific dumping margin calculated for
International Trade Administration registered users at https:// Tokyo Steel.5
access.trade.gov and it is available to all The Department received no
[A–588–875]
parties in the Central Records Unit, comments regarding its preliminary
Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- room B–8024 of the main Department of application of the AFA dumping margin
Length Plate From Japan: Final Commerce building. In addition, a to JFE and Shimabun. For the final
Determination of Sales at Less Than complete version of the Issues and
3 For discussion of our verification findings, see
Fair Value Decision Memorandum can be accessed
the following memoranda: Memorandum to the File
directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ through Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, frn/index.html. The signed and Office V, from Kabir Archuletta, Senior
International Trade Administration, electronic versions of the Issues and International Trade Analyst, and Ryan Mullen,
Department of Commerce. Decision Memorandum are identical in International Trade Analyst, entitled ‘‘Verification
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce of Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., in the
content. Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Carbon
(the Department) determines that certain
and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Japan,’’
carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length 1 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- dated January 17, 2017; Memorandum to the File
plate (CTL plate) from Japan is being, or Length Plate from Japan: Preliminary Determination through Neal M. Halper, Director, Office of
is likely to be, sold in the United States of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement Accounting and Michael P. Martin, Lead
at less than fair value (LTFV). The of Final Determination, 81 FR 79427 (November 14, Accountant, Office of Accounting from Kristin L.
2016) (Preliminary Determination). Case, Senior Accountant, entitled ‘‘Verification of
period of investigation (POI) is April 1, the Cost Response of Tokyo Steel Manufacturing
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman,
2015, through March 31, 2016. The final Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Co., Ltd. in the Less-Than-Fair Value Investigation
weighted-average dumping margins of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, of Certain Alloy and Carbon Steel Cut-to-Length
sales at LTFV are listed below in the to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary Plate from Japan,’’ dated January 9, 2017.
4 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from
‘‘Final Determination’’ section of this for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ‘‘Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final JFE ‘‘Advisement of Non-Participation in
notice. Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair- Investigation’’ (June 20, 2016); Letter to the
DATES: Effective April 4, 2017. Value Investigation of Certain Carbon and Alloy Secretary of Commerce from Shimabun
Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Japan,’’ dated ‘‘Shimabun’s Notification of Non-Participation’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision (July 29, 2016).
Kabir Archuletta or Ryan Mullen, AD/ Memorandum). 5 See Preliminary Determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_16412/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Notices 16351
investigation unless specifically excluded or not exceeding 1.5, B not exceeding 1.0, C not • Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and
covered by the scope of an existing order. exceeding 0.5, D not exceeding 1.5; and • Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm.
The following products are outside of, and/ (d) Conforming to ASTM A578–S9 (b) Having cleanliness in accordance with
or specifically excluded from, the scope of ultrasonic testing requirements with ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A
this investigation: acceptance criteria 2 mm flat bottom hole; not exceeding 1.0(t) and 0.5(h), B not
(1) Products clad, plated, or coated with (6) Alloy forged and rolled steel CTL plate exceeding 1.5(t) and 1.0(h), C not exceeding
metal, whether or not painted, varnished or over 407 mm in actual thickness and meeting 1.0(t) and 0.5(h), and D not exceeding 1.5(t)
coated with plastic or other non-metallic the following requirements: and 1.0(h);
substances; (a) Made from Electric Arc Furnace melted, (c) Having the following mechanical
(2) military grade armor plate certified to Ladle refined & vacuum degassed, alloy steel properties: A Brinell hardness not less than
one of the following specifications or to a with the following chemical composition
specification that references and incorporates 350 HBW measured in all parts of the
(expressed in weight percentages):
product including mid thickness; and having
one of the following specifications: • Carbon 0.23–0.28,
• MIL–A–12560, a Yield Strength of 145ksi or more and UTS
• Silicon 0.05–0.15,
• MIL–DTL–12560H, • Manganese 1.20–1.50, 160ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more
• MIL–DTL–12560J, • Nickel not greater than 0.4, and Reduction of area 35% or more; having
• MIL–DTL–12560K, • Sulfur not greater than 0.010, charpy V at ¥40 degrees F in the transverse
• MIL–DTL–32332, • Phosphorus not greater than 0.020, direction equal or greater than 20 ft. lbs
• MIL–A–46100D, • Chromium 1.20–1.50, (single value) and equal or greater than 25 ft.
• MIL–DTL–46100–E, • Molybdenum 0.35–0.55, lbs (average of 3 specimens);
• MIL–46177C, • Boron 0.002–0.004, (d) Conforming to ASTM A578–S9
• MIL–S–16216K Grade HY80, • Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm, ultrasonic testing requirements with
• MIL–S–16216K Grade HY100, • Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole;
• MIL–S–24645A HSLA–80; • Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm; and
• MIL–S–24645A HSLA–100, (b) Having cleanliness in accordance with (e) Conforming to magnetic particle
• T9074–BD–GIB–010/0300 Grade HY80, ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A inspection in accordance with AMS 2301.
• T9074–BD–GIB–010/0300 Grade HY100, not exceeding 1.5, B not exceeding 1.5, C not The products subject to the investigation
• T9074–BD–GIB–010/0300 Grade exceeding 1.0, D not exceeding 1.5; are currently classified in the Harmonized
HSLA80, (c) Having the following mechanical Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
• T9074–BD–GIB–010/0300 Grade properties: under item numbers: 7208.40.3030,
HSLA100, and (i) With a Brinell hardness not more than 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
• T9074–BD–GIB–010/0300 Mod. Grade
237 HBW measured in all parts of the 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7211.13.0000,
HSLA115,
product including mid thickness; and having 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110,
except that any cut-to-length plate certified to a Yield Strength of 75ksi min and UTS 95ksi 7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 7225.40.3050,
one of the above specifications, or to a or more, Elongation of 18% or more and 7226.20.0000, and 7226.91.5000.
military grade armor specification that Reduction of area 35% or more; having The products subject to the investigation
references and incorporates one of the above charpy V at ¥75 degrees F in the may also enter under the following HTSUS
specifications, will not be excluded from the longitudinal direction equal or greater than item numbers: 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000,
scope if it is also dual- or multiple-certified 15 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater
to any other non-armor specification that 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000,
than 20 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens) and 7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.4500,
otherwise would fall within the scope of this conforming to the requirements of NACE
investigation; 7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7590, 7211.90.0000,
MR01–75; or 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000,
(3) stainless steel plate, containing 10.5 (ii) With a Brinell hardness not less than 7214.10.0000, 7214.30.0010, 7214.30.0080,
percent or more of chromium by weight and 240 HBW measured in all parts of the
not more than 1.2 percent of carbon by 7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090,
product including mid thickness; and having 7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.40.5110,
weight; a Yield Strength of 90 ksi min and UTS 110
(4) CTL plate meeting the requirements of 7225.40.5130, 7225.40.5160, 7225.40.7000,
ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more and 7225.99.0010, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000,
ASTM A–829, Grade E 4340 that are over 305 Reduction of area 30% or more; having
mm in actual thickness; 7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000,
charpy V at ¥40 degrees F in the 7226.91.0500, 7226.91.1530, 7226.91.1560,
(5) Alloy forged and rolled CTL plate longitudinal direction equal or greater than
greater than or equal to 152.4 mm in actual 7226.91.2530, 7226.91.2560, 7226.91.7000,
21 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater
thickness meeting each of the following 7226.91.8000, and 7226.99.0180.
than 31 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens);
requirements: The HTSUS subheadings above are
(d) Conforming to ASTM A578–S9
(a) Electric furnace melted, ladle refined & provided for convenience and customs
ultrasonic testing requirements with
vacuum degassed and having a chemical purposes only. The written description of the
acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole;
composition (expressed in weight scope of the investigation is dispositive.
percentages): and
• Carbon 0.23–0.28, (e) Conforming to magnetic particle Appendix II
• Silicon 0.05–0.20, inspection in accordance with AMS 2301;
(7) Alloy forged and rolled steel CTL plate List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
• Manganese 1.20–1.60, Decision Memorandum
• Nickel not greater than 1.0, over 407 mm in actual thickness and meeting
• Sulfur not greater than 0.007, the following requirements: I. Summary
• Phosphorus not greater than 0.020, (a) Made from Electric Arc Furnace melted, II. Background
• Chromium 1.0–2.5, ladle refined & vacuum degassed, alloy steel III. Scope of the Investigation
• Molybdenum 0.35–0.80, with the following chemical composition IV. Scope Comments
• Boron 0.002–0.004, (expressed in weight percentages): V. Margin Calculations
• Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm, • Carbon 0.25–0.30, VI. Discussion of Issues
• Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and • Silicon not greater than 0.25,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
a. Comment 1: Unreported Bank Transfer
• Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm; • Manganese not greater than 0.50, Fees
(b) With a Brinell hardness measured in all • Nickel 3.0–3.5, b. Comment 2: Cost Adjustments Based on
parts of the product including mid thickness • Sulfur not greater than 0.010, Verification Findings
falling within one of the following ranges: • Phosphorus not greater than 0.020, c. Comment 3: Expenses Identified at
(i) 270–300 HBW, • Chromium 1.0–1.5, Verification
(ii) 290–320 HBW, or • Molybdenum 0.6–0.9, VII. Recommendation
(iii) 320–350 HBW; • Vanadium 0.08 to 0.12
(c) Having cleanliness in accordance with • Boron 0.002–0.004, [FR Doc. 2017–06629 Filed 4–3–17; 8:45 am]
ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A • Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_16412/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-03 23:54:06
Document Modified: 2017-04-03 23:54:06
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective April 4, 2017. | |
| Contact | Kabir Archuletta or Ryan Mullen, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2593 and (202) 482-5260, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 16349 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR