82 FR 1696 - Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 4 (January 6, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 4 (January 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 1696-1698 | |
| FR Document | 2017-00036 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 1696-1698] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-00036] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-896] Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), covering the period April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. The Department preliminarily determines that Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (``TMI'') and Tianjin Magnesium Metal, Co., Ltd. (``TMM'') did not have reviewable entries during the period of review (``POR''). We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. [[Page 1697]] DATES: Effective January 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Brendan Quinn, AD/ CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3965 or (202) 482-5848, respectively. Background On April 1, 2016, the Department published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the PRC for the POR.\1\ On April 29, 2016, in response to a timely request from Petitioner,\2\ and in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the PRC with respect to TMI and TMM.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 18826 (April 1, 2016). \2\ See letter from U.S. Magnesium LLC (``Petitioner''), ``Magnesium Metal from the People's Republic of China: Request for Administrative Review,'' dated April 29, 2016. \3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 36268 (June 6, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by this order is magnesium metal from the PRC, which includes primary and secondary alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form, shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is produced by decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary magnesium is produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium metal. The magnesium covered by this order includes blends of primary and secondary magnesium. The subject merchandise includes the following alloy magnesium metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium including, without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other shapes; magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, or machined into rasping, granules, turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and other shapes; and products that contain 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, magnesium, by weight, and that have been entered into the United States as conforming to an ``ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy''\4\ and are thus outside the scope of the existing antidumping orders on magnesium from the PRC (generally referred to as ``alloy'' magnesium). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ The meaning of this term is the same as that used by the American Society for Testing and Materials in its Annual Book for ASTM Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The scope of this order excludes: (1) All forms of pure magnesium, including chemical combinations of magnesium and other material(s) in which the pure magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, by weight, that do not conform to an ``ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy'' \5\; (2) magnesium that is in liquid or molten form; and (3) mixtures containing 90 percent or less magnesium in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of certain non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based reagent mixtures, including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/ mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and colemanite.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The material is already covered by existing antidumping orders. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001). \6\ This third exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000-2001 investigations of magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form From the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 (September 27, 2001); Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001); Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys, because they are not combined in liquid form and cast into the same ingot. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under items 8104.19.00, and 8104.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS items are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments We received timely submissions from TMM and TMI certifying that they did not have sales, shipments, or exports of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\7\ On July 11, 2016, we requested the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data file of entries of subject merchandise imported into the United States during the POR, and exported by TMM and/or TMI. This query returned no entries during the POR.\8\ Additionally, in order to examine TMM's and TMI's claim, we sent an inquiry to CBP requesting that it provide any information contrary to these no-shipments claims.\9\ We received no notification from CBP of any entries of subject merchandise concerning these companies. On August 15, 2016, Petitioner, submitted public information it alleged contradicts TMM's and TMI's certifications of no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See letter from TMM, ``Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China; A-570-896; Certification of No Sales by Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd.,'' dated June 24, 2016, at 1. See letter from TMI, ``Magnesium Metal from the People's Republic of China; A- 570-896; Certification of No Sales by Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 1, 2016, at 1. \8\ See Memorandum to the File, ``RE: U.S. Customs and Border Protection Data,'' dated September 29, 2016 (``No Shipments Memo''), at Attachment 1. \9\ See No Shipments Memo, at Attachment 2. See also CBP message 6250303, dated 09/06/2016. \10\ See letter from Petitioner, ``Magnesium Metal from the People's Republic of China: Response to TMM/TMI's No Shipment Certifications,'' dated August 15, 2016, at Exhibits 1-3. We provided the information submitted by Petitioner to CBP on November 4, 2016. See the Department's letter to Alexander Amdur, Director, AD/CVD Policy & Programs Division, Office of International Trade U.S. Customs & Border Protection, from Wendy J. Frankel Director, Customs Liaison Unit, ``Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China and Magnesium Metal from the People's Republic of China,'' dated November 4, 2016, at Attachment II. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because we have not received information to the contrary from CBP, consistent with our practice, we preliminarily determine that TMI and TMM had no shipments and, therefore, no reviewable entries during the POR. In addition, we find it is not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to these companies but, rather, to complete the review with respect to TMI and TMM and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review, consistent with our practice in non-market economy (``NME'') cases.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 2014-2015, 81 FR 72567 (October 20, 2016) and the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 1698]] Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\12\ Rebuttals to case briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the date for filing case briefs.\13\ Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with each argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the argument, and (c) a table of authorities.\14\ Parties submitting briefs should do so pursuant to the Department's electronic filing system: Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'').\15\ ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)(2). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date of the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Unless extended, we intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, including our analysis of all issues raised in any written brief, within 120 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\16\ We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. Pursuant to the Department's practice in NME cases, if we continue to determine in the final results that TMI and TMM had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR from these companies will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \17\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMI, which claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to TMI in the most recently completed review of the company; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate (including TMM, which claimed no shipments, but has not been found to be separate from the PRC-wide entity), the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 141.49 percent; and (4) for all non- PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this period. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: December 29, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017-00036 Filed 1-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![1696 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices
the source of raw materials for the MgO, shall assess, antidumping duties on all 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
with carbon levels ranging from trace appropriate entries in this review, in regarding the reimbursement of
amounts to 30 percent by weight, accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
regardless of enhancements (for the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). The of the relevant entries during this
example, MCBs can be enhanced with Department intends to issue assessment review period. Failure to comply with
coating, grinding, tar impregnation or instructions directly to CBP 15 days this requirement could result in the
coking, high temperature heat after publication in the Federal Register Secretary’s presumption that
treatments, anti-slip treatments or metal of these final results of this reimbursement of antidumping duties
casing) and regardless of whether or not administrative review. occurred and the subsequent assessment
antioxidants are present (for example, In accordance with the Department’s of double antidumping duties.
antioxidants can be added to the mix assessment practice in NME cases, for
from trace amounts to 15 percent by entries that were not reported in the Administrative Protective Order
weight as various metals, metal alloys, U.S. sales data submitted by companies This notice also serves as a reminder
and metal carbides). Certain MCBs that individually examined during the to parties subject to administrative
are the subject of this order are currently administrative review, the Department protective order (APO) of their
classifiable under subheadings will instruct CBP to liquidate such responsibility concerning the return or
6902.10.1000, 6902.10.5000, entries for the PRC-wide entity. destruction of proprietary information
6815.91.0000, 6815.99.2000, and Additionally, if the Department disclosed under APO in accordance
6815.99.4000 of the Harmonized Tariff determines that an exporter had no with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). shipments of the subject merchandise, continues to govern business
While HTSUS subheadings are provided any suspended entries that entered proprietary information in this segment
for convenience and customs purposes, under that exporter’s case number (i.e., of the proceeding. Timely written
the written description is dispositive. at that exporter’s cash deposit rate) will notification of the return/destruction of
be liquidated at the rate for the PRC- APO materials or conversion to judicial
Final Results of Review wide entity.5 protective order is hereby requested.
As noted above, the Department Failure to comply with the regulations
received no comments concerning the Cash Deposit Requirements
and terms of an APO is a violation,
Preliminary Results. As there are no The following cash deposit which is subject to sanction.
changes from, or comments upon, the requirements will be effective upon We are issuing and publishing this
Preliminary Results, the Department publication of the final results of this notice in accordance with sections
finds that there is no reason to modify administrative review for all shipments 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
its analysis. Therefore, in these final of the subject merchandise entered, or CFR 351.213(h).
results of review, we have rescinded the withdrawn from warehouse, for
review with respect to Fedmet consumption on or after the publication Dated: December 29, 2016.
Resources Corporation, continued to date, as provided for by section Paul Piquado,
find that Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For any Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Ltd. of Haicheng City and RHI companies listed that have a separate Compliance.
Refractories Liaoning, Co. Ltd. had no rate, the cash deposit rate will be that [FR Doc. 2017–00027 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am]
reviewable entries, and treated the established in the final results of this BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
remaining companies under review as review (except, if the rate is zero or de
part of the PRC-wide entity.2 The minimis, then zero cash deposit will be
Department’s policy regarding required); (2) for previously investigated DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
conditional review of the PRC-wide or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
entity applies to this administrative not listed that received a separate rate International Trade Administration
review.3 Under this policy, the PRC- in a prior segment of this proceeding, [A–570–896]
wide entity will not be under review the cash deposit rate will continue to be
unless a party specifically requests, or the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for Magnesium Metal From the People’s
the Department self-initiates, a review of all PRC exporters of subject Republic of China: Preliminary Results
the entity. Because the PRC-wide entity merchandise that have not been found of Antidumping Duty Administrative
is not under review, the entity’s rate to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash Review; 2015–2016
(i.e., 236.00 percent) is not subject to deposit rate will be that for the PRC-
change.4 wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
exporters of subject merchandise which International Trade Administration,
Assessment Rates have not received their own rate, the Department of Commerce.
The Department determined, and U.S. cash deposit rate will be the rate SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) applicable to the PRC exporter that (‘‘Department’’) is conducting the
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These administrative review of the
2 For further details of the issues addressed in this
deposit requirements, when imposed, antidumping duty order on magnesium
proceeding, see the Preliminary Results and
accompanying PDM which can be accessed directly
shall remain in effect until further metal from the People’s Republic of
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. notice. China (‘‘PRC’’), covering the period
3 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016.
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Reimbursement of Duties
The Department preliminarily
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and This notice also serves as a final determines that Tianjin Magnesium
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
reminder to importers of their International, Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’) and
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). responsibility under 19 CFR Tianjin Magnesium Metal, Co., Ltd.
4 See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the
(‘‘TMM’’) did not have reviewable
People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final 5 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
entries during the period of review
Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 80 FR 19961, Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, (‘‘POR’’). We invite interested parties to
19962 (April 14, 2015). 65694–95 (October 24, 2011). comment on these preliminary results.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Jan 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_1700/page/1.svg)
![1698 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices
Public Comment this review. Pursuant to the Dated: December 29, 2016.
Interested parties may submit case Department’s practice in NME cases, if Paul Piquado,
briefs no later than 30 days after the we continue to determine in the final Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
date of publication of this notice in the results that TMI and TMM had no Compliance.
Federal Register.12 Rebuttals to case shipments of subject merchandise, any [FR Doc. 2017–00036 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am]
briefs, which must be limited to issues suspended entries of subject BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
raised in the case briefs, must be filed merchandise during the POR from these
within five days after the date for filing companies will be liquidated at the
case briefs.13 Parties who submit PRC-wide rate.17 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
arguments are requested to submit with Cash Deposit Requirements
each argument (a) a statement of the International Trade Administration
The following cash deposit
issue, (b) a brief summary of the [A–570–932]
requirements will be effective upon
argument, and (c) a table of
publication of the final results of this Certain Steel Threaded Rod From the
authorities.14 Parties submitting briefs
administrative review for all shipments People’s Republic of China: Amended
should do so pursuant to the
of the subject merchandise entered, or Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Department’s electronic filing system:
withdrawn from warehouse, for Administrative Review; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance’s
consumption on or after the publication
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty date of the final results of review, as AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Centralized Electronic Service System provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of International Trade Administration,
(‘‘ACCESS’’).15 ACCESS is available to the Act: (1) For TMI, which claimed no Department of Commerce.
registered users at https:// shipments, the cash deposit rate will SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
access.trade.gov, and is available to all remain unchanged from the rate
parties in the Central Records Unit, (the ‘‘Department’’) published the Final
assigned to TMI in the most recently Results of the sixth administrative
Room B8024 of the main Department of completed review of the company; (2)
Commerce building. review of the antidumping duty order
for previously investigated or reviewed on certain steel threaded rod from the
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not
interested parties who wish to request a People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on
under review in this segment of the November 22, 2016. The period of
hearing must submit a written request to proceeding but who have separate rates,
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement review (‘‘POR’’) is April 1, 2014,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be through March 31, 2015. This review
and Compliance, U.S. Department of the exporter-specific rate published for
Commerce within 30 days of the date of covers two PRC exporters of subject
the most recent period; (3) for all PRC merchandise, RMB Fasteners Ltd., IFI &
publication of this notice. Hearing exporters of subject merchandise that
requests should contain the following Morgan Ltd., and Jiaxing Brother
have not been found to be entitled to a Standard Part Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘the
information: (1) The party’s name, separate rate (including TMM, which
address, and telephone number; (2) the RMB/IFI Group’’), and Zhejiang New
claimed no shipments, but has not been Oriental Fastener Co., Ltd. (‘‘New
number of participants; and (3) a list of found to be separate from the PRC-wide
the issues parties intend to discuss. Oriental’’). The amended final dumping
entity), the cash deposit rate will be the margins are listed below in the ‘‘Final
Issues raised in the hearing will be PRC-wide rate of 141.49 percent; and (4)
limited to those raised in the respective Results of Administrative Review’’
for all non-PRC exporters of subject section of this notice.
case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for merchandise which have not received
a hearing is made, parties will be DATES: Effective January 6, 2017.
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
notified of the time and date of the be the rate applicable to the PRC FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
hearing which will be held at the U.S. exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC Walker, AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Department of Commerce, 1401 exporter. These deposit requirements, Enforcement and Compliance,
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, when imposed, shall remain in effect International Trade Administration,
DC 20230. until further notice. U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Unless extended, we intend to issue Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
the final results of this administrative Notification to Importers Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
review, including our analysis of all This notice also serves as a 482–0413.
issues raised in any written brief, within preliminary reminder to importers of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
120 days of publication of this notice in their responsibility under 19 CFR
the Federal Register, pursuant to 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Background
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. regarding the reimbursement of The Department published in the
Assessment Rates antidumping duties prior to liquidation Federal Register the Final Results of
of the relevant entries during this this administrative review on November
Upon issuance of the final results, the period. Failure to comply with this 22, 2016.1 On December 2, 2016, New
Department will determine, and CBP requirement may result in the Oriental filed a timely allegation that
shall assess, antidumping duties on all Secretary’s presumption that the Department made two ministerial
appropriate entries covered by this reimbursement of antidumping duties errors in the Final Results and
review.16 We intend to issue assessment occurred and the subsequent assessment requested, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224,
instructions to CBP 15 days after the of double antidumping duties.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
that the Department correct the alleged
publication date of the final results of This notice is issued in accordance ministerial errors. No other party
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 1 See Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the
13 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)(2). People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
14 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
17 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
15 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 2015, 81 FR 8300 (November 22, 2016) (‘‘Final
requirements). Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Results’’), and accompanying Issues and Decision
16 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). (October 24, 2011). Memorandum (‘‘IDM’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Jan 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_1700/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-01-06 01:30:01
Document Modified: 2017-01-06 01:30:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective January 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | James Terpstra or Brendan Quinn, AD/ CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3965 or (202) 482-5848, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 1696 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR