82 FR 17067 - Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 66 (April 7, 2017)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 66 (April 7, 2017)
| Page Range | 17067-17068 | |
| FR Document | 2017-06952 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 66 (Friday, April 7, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 17067-17068] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-06952] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0066; Notice 2] Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Grant of petition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (BATO), has determined that certain Bridgestone VSB heavy-duty radial truck tires do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles. BATO filed a noncompliance report dated April 7, 2016. BATO then petitioned NHTSA on May 5, 2016, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. ADDRESSES: For further information on this decision contact Abraham Diaz, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5310, facsimile (202) 366-5930. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Overview: Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (BATO), has determined that certain Bridgestone VSB heavy-duty radial truck tires do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(d) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles. BATO filed a report dated April 7, 2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. BATO then petitioned NHTSA on May 5, 2016, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and their implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 556, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the petition was published, with a 30-day public comment period, on June 29, 2016, in the Federal Register (81 FR 42394). No comments were received. To view the petition and all supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2016-0066.'' II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 1,167 Bridgestone VSB heavy-duty radial truck tires used mainly in a military application. Other instances include a few off-road logging applications and a single on-road snow plow vehicle for single load application. The affected tires were manufactured between April 5, 2015, and March 30, 2016. III. Noncompliance: BATO stated that the subject tires are rated for both a single and a dual load and are marked with the proper maximum load rating and inflation pressure for a single load. However, they are not marked with the dual load information. As a result, the tires do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(d) of FMVSS No. 119. IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S6.5(d) of FMVSS No. 119 provides, in pertinent part: S6.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on each sidewall with the information specified in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this section . . . (d) The maximum load rating and corresponding inflation pressure of the tire, shown as follows: (Mark on tires rated for single and dual load): Max load single _ kg (_ lb) at _ Pa (_ psi) cold. Max load dual _ kg (_ lb) at _ kPa (_ psi) cold. (Mark on tires rated only for single load): Max load _ kg (_ lb) at _ kPa (_ psi) cold. . . V. Summary of BATO's Petition: BATO described the subject noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. BATO states that the subject tires meet or exceed all of the performance requirements of FMVSS No. 119. BATO also contends that the missing dual load information has no effect on the performance of the subject tires and that the subject tires were tested and passed at the single tire load, which is higher and more punishing than that of the dual tire load. BATO asserted that NHTSA has previously granted inconsequential noncompliance petitions similar to the subject noncompliance. BATO submitted a supplemental letter to the agency dated September 23, 2016, which provided information about the use of the affected tires. BATO accounted for 100% of the affected tires as follows: 1. BATO stated that approximately 90% of all affected tires were sold to a customer using the tires on an M911 Heavy Equipment Transporter (HET) used by the U.S. Army. The M911 HET uses the subject tires in dual-load configuration. The dual-load configuration is used on the third and fourth axles. BATO provided an excerpt of the U.S. Army Technical Manual for vehicle M911. In the manual, the vehicle manufacturer specifies the maximum load for the third and fourth tandem axles as 65,000 lbs. Because there are 8 tires total on these two axles, this corresponds to 8,125 lbs per tire. BATO further states that from the Tire and Rim Association (TRA) Year Book, the subject tires are rated for 9,410 lbs in dual-load applications when inflated to 85 psi. Thus, in a maximum-load condition, the subject tires each have 1,285 lbs of reserve load (nearly 14%) when used in the only known on- road [[Page 17068]] dual-application positions on Axles 3 and 4 as stated by BATO. 2. BATO stated that two tires were sent to a customer using the affected tires in a single-load application on a heavy-duty snowplow and that the proper maximum loading information for single-load is marked on the sidewall of the tire. 3. BATO stated that about 10% of the subject tires were sold to customers that use these tires on private or unpaved roads. These customers are using the tires on logging trailers at forestry sites and on equipment trailers at oil exploration sites. In both cases, these off-road trailers are operated almost exclusively on unpaved, private roads, and are not considered to be ``motor vehicles'' as defined by the Motor Vehicle Safety Act. See 49 U.S.C. 30102(a)(6) which defines a ``motor vehicle'' as one that is ``manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads and highways''. BATO added that the subject tires are performing extremely well in the field. The subject tires have been in the market for up to 17 months (manufactured dates range from April 5, 2015, to March 30, 2016), and there is no indication of problems related to potential overload. BATO included that there have been no claims, lawsuits, adjustments, accidents, collisions or losses of control related to the subject tires. 4. BATO states that NHTSA has previously granted petitions in which the ``dual'' maximum load information was marked incorrectly on the subject tires. BATO specifically cited Michelin 69 FR 62512; October 26, 2004, and Michelin 71 FR 77092; December 22, 2006. BATO concluded by expressing the belief that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. NHTSA's Decision NHTSA's Analysis: NHTSA agrees that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. However, NHTSA has some reservations about BATO's petition. NHTSA's analysis of BATO's points are described below: BATO asserted that NHTSA has previously granted inconsequential noncompliance petitions that are similar to the subject noncompliance. NHTSA responds that those petitions are not similar because they are cases involving specific conditions in which both the ``Single'' and ``Dual'' loads were marked on the sidewall of the tire and the ``Dual'' loads were within the safety factor range associated for similar tires of its size. (See Michelin 71 FR 77092; Dec. 22, 2006, and Michelin 69 FR 62512; October 26, 2004.) BATO states that the subject tires meet or exceed all of the performance requirements of FMVSS No. 119 which were tested and passed at the single tire load, which is higher and more punishing than that of the dual tire load. NHTSA does not find this to be a compelling argument. NHTSA does not agree that complying to the standard when tested in the manufacturer's single load specification negates the necessity for the tire to be properly marked with the correct dual load rating which, intentionally, is lower than the single load rating. The dual load rating is necessary to ensure a factor of safety during on road use conditions involving a dual-load configuration. What NHTSA finds relevant to a decision of inconsequential noncompliance is that the use of the subject tires is restricted to three specific cases: vehicles using the tires only in a single-load configuration; Vehicles the agency has determined to be off-road vehicles; and military vehicles. The analysis of each of these scenarios follows: First, BATO indicated that two of the subject tires were sold for use on a heavy-duty snowplow. The heavy-duty snowplow that uses these tires uses them exclusively in a single load application. The subject tires are marked properly on the sidewall for single load application and thus an end-user would be able to load the vehicle properly. Therefore, NHTSA agrees that in this specific case, the noncompliance is inconsequential to safety. Second, approximately 10% of the subject tires are used exclusively for off-road forestry logging and oil site exploration. In a letter dated July 25, 2011, NHTSA's Office of Chief Counsel communicated to the Michigan Association of Timbermen the following: ``NHTSA has issued several interpretations of this language. We have stated that vehicles equipped with tracks, agricultural equipment, and other vehicles incapable of highway travel are not motor vehicles. We have also determined that certain vehicles designed and sold solely for off-road use (e.g., airport runway vehicles and underground mining vehicles) are not motor vehicles, even if they may be operationally capable of highway travel.'' In light of this, NHTSA agrees that in the case of the subject tires, the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety because the tires are not used on public roads. Finally, approximately 90% of the subject tires were sold to the U.S. Army for use on M911 HET military vehicles. In this application, the M911 HET technical manual specifies the tire inflation pressure to be 85 psi and limits the tire loading to 8,125 lbs per tire due to the vehicle's axle design. BATO claims that the subject tires were designed and certified to meet a dual-load limit of 9,410 lbs at 85 psi, a fact corroborated by the TRA year book, and that each tire would have 1,285 lbs of reserve load (nearly 14%). For these reasons, NHTSA believes that the subject tires have sufficient capacity for the expected loads during usage on the M911 HET military vehicles. Based on the restrictions within the military manual, the culture of the military to comply with such documentation, and the high level of maintenance that military vehicles receive, NHTSA further believes that these tires will not be used in an overloaded configuration. Therefore, the noncompliance is inconsequential to vehicle safety in this instance. NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that BATO has met its burden of persuasion that in these specific vehicle applications, the FMVSS No. 119 noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, BATO's petition is hereby granted and BATO is exempted from the obligation of providing notification of, and remedy for, the noncompliance. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8. Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017-06952 Filed 4-6-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Notices 17067
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and tires do not fully comply with paragraph
Ronda Thompson by email at: Motorcycles. BATO filed a S6.5(d) of FMVSS No. 119.
Ronda.Thompson@faa.gov. noncompliance report dated April 7, IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S6.5(d) of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2016. BATO then petitioned NHTSA on FMVSS No. 119 provides, in pertinent
OMB Control Number: 2120–0021. May 5, 2016, for a decision that the part:
Title: Certification: Pilots and Flight subject noncompliance is S6.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in
Instructors. inconsequential as it relates to motor this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on
Form Numbers: FAA Forms 8710–1. vehicle safety. each sidewall with the information specified
Type of Review: Reinstatement of an ADDRESSES: For further information on in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this
information collection. this decision contact Abraham Diaz, section . . .
Background: Title 14 of the Code of (d) The maximum load rating and
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the corresponding inflation pressure of the tire,
Federal Regulations part 61 (14 CFR part
National Highway Traffic Safety shown as follows:
61) Certification: Pilots, Flight
Administration (NHTSA), telephone (Mark on tires rated for single and dual
Instructors, and Ground Instructors
(202) 366–5310, facsimile (202) 366– load): Max load single l kg (l lb) at l Pa
prescribes minimum standards and
5930. (l psi) cold. Max load dual l kg (l lb) at
requirements for the issuance of airman l kPa (l psi) cold.
certificates, and establishes procedures SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (Mark on tires rated only for single load):
for applying for airman certificates. The I. Overview: Bridgestone Americas Max load l kg (l lb) at l kPa (l psi)
Airman Certificate and/or Rating Tire Operations, LLC (BATO), has cold. . .
Application form and the required determined that certain Bridgestone V. Summary of BATO’s Petition:
records, logbooks and statements VSB heavy-duty radial truck tires do not BATO described the subject
required by the federal regulations are fully comply with paragraph S6.5(d) of noncompliance and stated its belief that
submitted to Federal Aviation Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard the noncompliance is inconsequential
Administration (FAA) Flight Standards (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
District Offices or its representatives to for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of BATO states that the subject tires meet
determine qualifications of the more than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 or exceed all of the performance
applicant for issuance of a pilot or pounds) and Motorcycles. BATO filed a requirements of FMVSS No. 119. BATO
instructor certificate, or rating or report dated April 7, 2016, pursuant to also contends that the missing dual load
authorization. 49 CFR part 573, Defect and information has no effect on the
Respondents: Approximately Noncompliance Responsibility and performance of the subject tires and that
1,196,653 responses. Reports. BATO then petitioned NHTSA
Frequency: On occasion. the subject tires were tested and passed
on May 5, 2016, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. at the single tire load, which is higher
Estimated Average Burden per 30118(d) and 30120(h) and their
Response: 25 minutes. and more punishing than that of the
implementing regulations at 49 CFR part dual tire load.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 556, for an exemption from the
330,501 hours. BATO asserted that NHTSA has
notification and remedy requirements of previously granted inconsequential
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 3, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that noncompliance petitions similar to the
2017. this noncompliance is inconsequential subject noncompliance.
Ronda L. Thompson, as it relates to motor vehicle safety. BATO submitted a supplemental
FAA Information Collection Clearance Notice of receipt of the petition was letter to the agency dated September 23,
Officer, Performance, Policy, and Records published, with a 30-day public 2016, which provided information about
Management Branch, ASP–110. comment period, on June 29, 2016, in the use of the affected tires. BATO
[FR Doc. 2017–07011 Filed 4–6–17; 8:45 am] the Federal Register (81 FR 42394). No accounted for 100% of the affected tires
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P comments were received. To view the as follows:
petition and all supporting documents 1. BATO stated that approximately
log onto the Federal Docket 90% of all affected tires were sold to a
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Management System (FDMS) Web site customer using the tires on an M911
at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then Heavy Equipment Transporter (HET)
National Highway Traffic Safety follow the online search instructions to
Administration used by the U.S. Army. The M911 HET
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2016– uses the subject tires in dual-load
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0066; Notice 2] 0066.’’ configuration. The dual-load
II. Tires Involved: Affected are configuration is used on the third and
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, approximately 1,167 Bridgestone VSB fourth axles. BATO provided an excerpt
LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of heavy-duty radial truck tires used of the U.S. Army Technical Manual for
Inconsequential Noncompliance mainly in a military application. Other vehicle M911. In the manual, the
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic instances include a few off-road logging vehicle manufacturer specifies the
Safety Administration (NHTSA), applications and a single on-road snow maximum load for the third and fourth
Department of Transportation (DOT). plow vehicle for single load application. tandem axles as 65,000 lbs. Because
ACTION: Grant of petition.
The affected tires were manufactured there are 8 tires total on these two axles,
between April 5, 2015, and March 30, this corresponds to 8,125 lbs per tire.
SUMMARY: Bridgestone Americas Tire 2016. BATO further states that from the Tire
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
Operations, LLC (BATO), has III. Noncompliance: BATO stated that and Rim Association (TRA) Year Book,
determined that certain Bridgestone the subject tires are rated for both a the subject tires are rated for 9,410 lbs
VSB heavy-duty radial truck tires do not single and a dual load and are marked in dual-load applications when inflated
fully comply with Federal Motor with the proper maximum load rating to 85 psi. Thus, in a maximum-load
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. and inflation pressure for a single load. condition, the subject tires each have
119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor However, they are not marked with the 1,285 lbs of reserve load (nearly 14%)
Vehicles with a GVWR of more than dual load information. As a result, the when used in the only known on-road
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Apr 06, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17133/page/1.svg)
![17068 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Notices
dual-application positions on Axles 3 specific conditions in which both the noncompliance is inconsequential as it
and 4 as stated by BATO. ‘‘Single’’ and ‘‘Dual’’ loads were marked relates to motor vehicle safety because
2. BATO stated that two tires were on the sidewall of the tire and the the tires are not used on public roads.
sent to a customer using the affected ‘‘Dual’’ loads were within the safety Finally, approximately 90% of the
tires in a single-load application on a factor range associated for similar tires subject tires were sold to the U.S. Army
heavy-duty snowplow and that the of its size. (See Michelin 71 FR 77092; for use on M911 HET military vehicles.
proper maximum loading information Dec. 22, 2006, and Michelin 69 FR In this application, the M911 HET
for single-load is marked on the 62512; October 26, 2004.) technical manual specifies the tire
sidewall of the tire. BATO states that the subject tires inflation pressure to be 85 psi and limits
3. BATO stated that about 10% of the meet or exceed all of the performance the tire loading to 8,125 lbs per tire due
subject tires were sold to customers that requirements of FMVSS No. 119 which to the vehicle’s axle design. BATO
use these tires on private or unpaved were tested and passed at the single tire claims that the subject tires were
roads. These customers are using the load, which is higher and more designed and certified to meet a dual-
tires on logging trailers at forestry sites punishing than that of the dual tire load. load limit of 9,410 lbs at 85 psi, a fact
and on equipment trailers at oil NHTSA does not find this to be a corroborated by the TRA year book, and
exploration sites. In both cases, these compelling argument. NHTSA does not that each tire would have 1,285 lbs of
off-road trailers are operated almost agree that complying to the standard reserve load (nearly 14%). For these
exclusively on unpaved, private roads, when tested in the manufacturer’s single reasons, NHTSA believes that the
and are not considered to be ‘‘motor load specification negates the necessity subject tires have sufficient capacity for
vehicles’’ as defined by the Motor for the tire to be properly marked with the expected loads during usage on the
Vehicle Safety Act. See 49 U.S.C. the correct dual load rating which, M911 HET military vehicles. Based on
30102(a)(6) which defines a ‘‘motor intentionally, is lower than the single the restrictions within the military
vehicle’’ as one that is ‘‘manufactured load rating. The dual load rating is manual, the culture of the military to
primarily for use on public streets, roads necessary to ensure a factor of safety comply with such documentation, and
and highways’’. during on road use conditions involving the high level of maintenance that
BATO added that the subject tires are a dual-load configuration. military vehicles receive, NHTSA
performing extremely well in the field. What NHTSA finds relevant to a further believes that these tires will not
The subject tires have been in the decision of inconsequential be used in an overloaded configuration.
market for up to 17 months noncompliance is that the use of the Therefore, the noncompliance is
(manufactured dates range from April 5, subject tires is restricted to three inconsequential to vehicle safety in this
2015, to March 30, 2016), and there is specific cases: vehicles using the tires instance.
no indication of problems related to only in a single-load configuration; NHTSA’s Decision: In consideration
potential overload. BATO included that Vehicles the agency has determined to
of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that
there have been no claims, lawsuits, be off-road vehicles; and military
BATO has met its burden of persuasion
adjustments, accidents, collisions or vehicles. The analysis of each of these
that in these specific vehicle
losses of control related to the subject scenarios follows:
First, BATO indicated that two of the applications, the FMVSS No. 119
tires. noncompliance is inconsequential to
4. BATO states that NHTSA has subject tires were sold for use on a
heavy-duty snowplow. The heavy-duty motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
previously granted petitions in which BATO’s petition is hereby granted and
the ‘‘dual’’ maximum load information snowplow that uses these tires uses
them exclusively in a single load BATO is exempted from the obligation
was marked incorrectly on the subject of providing notification of, and remedy
tires. BATO specifically cited Michelin application. The subject tires are
marked properly on the sidewall for for, the noncompliance.
69 FR 62512; October 26, 2004, and
Michelin 71 FR 77092; December 22, single load application and thus an end- Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
2006. user would be able to load the vehicle delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
BATO concluded by expressing the properly. Therefore, NHTSA agrees that 501.8.
belief that the subject noncompliance is in this specific case, the noncompliance Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
inconsequential as it relates to motor is inconsequential to safety. Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be Second, approximately 10% of the
[FR Doc. 2017–06952 Filed 4–6–17; 8:45 am]
exempted from providing notification of subject tires are used exclusively for off-
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
the noncompliance, as required by 49 road forestry logging and oil site
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the exploration. In a letter dated July 25,
noncompliance, as required by 49 2011, NHTSA’s Office of Chief Counsel
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. communicated to the Michigan
Association of Timbermen the National Highway Traffic Safety
NHTSA’s Decision following: ‘‘NHTSA has issued several Administration
NHTSA’s Analysis: NHTSA agrees interpretations of this language. We
that the noncompliance is have stated that vehicles equipped with [Docket No. NHTSA- 2016–0130; Notice 1]
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. tracks, agricultural equipment, and
However, NHTSA has some reservations other vehicles incapable of highway Notice of Receipt of Petition for
about BATO’s petition. NHTSA’s travel are not motor vehicles. We have Decision That Nonconforming Model
analysis of BATO’s points are described also determined that certain vehicles Year 2014 EMU Camper Trailer 4x4
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
below: designed and sold solely for off-road use Extreme Adventure Trailers Are
BATO asserted that NHTSA has (e.g., airport runway vehicles and Eligible for Importation
previously granted inconsequential underground mining vehicles) are not AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
noncompliance petitions that are similar motor vehicles, even if they may be Safety Administration (NHTSA),
to the subject noncompliance. NHTSA operationally capable of highway Department of Transportation (DOT).
responds that those petitions are not travel.’’ In light of this, NHTSA agrees
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
similar because they are cases involving that in the case of the subject tires, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Apr 06, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17133/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-06 23:49:51
Document Modified: 2017-04-06 23:49:51
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Grant of petition. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 17067 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR