82_FR_1771 82 FR 1767 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE MKT Equities Price List and the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule To Modify the Fees Related to Four Bundles of Co-Location Services in Connection With the Exchange's Co-Location Services

82 FR 1767 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE MKT Equities Price List and the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule To Modify the Fees Related to Four Bundles of Co-Location Services in Connection With the Exchange's Co-Location Services

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 4 (January 6, 2017)

Page Range1767-1770
FR Document2016-32040

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 4 (Friday, January 6, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1767-1770]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-32040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79717; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-123]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE MKT 
Equities Price List and the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule To Modify 
the Fees Related to Four Bundles of Co-Location Services in Connection 
With the Exchange's Co-Location Services

December 30, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on December 19, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or 
``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE MKT Equities Price List 
(``Price List'') and the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule (``Fee 
Schedule'') to modify the fees related to four bundles of co-location 
services (``Partial Cabinet Solution bundles'') in connection with the 
Exchange's co-location services. The Exchange proposes to implement the 
fee changes effective January 1, 2017. The proposed change is available 
on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of 
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Price List and Fee 
Schedule to modify the fees related to Partial Cabinet Solution bundles 
in connection with the Exchange's co-location services.\4\ Currently, 
the Exchange offers Users \5\ that purchase a Partial Cabinet Solution 
bundle on or before December 31, 2016 a 50% reduction in the monthly 
recurring charges (``MRC'') for the first 12 months.\6\ The Exchange 
now proposes to extend that 50% reduction until December 31, 2017. The 
Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective January 1, 
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its 
co-location services with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') in 2010. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
62961 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR 59299 (September 27, 2010) (SR-
NYSEAmex-2010-80) (the ``Original Co-location Filing''). The 
Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah, New Jersey (the ``data 
center'') from which it provides co-location services to Users.
    \5\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a 
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co-
location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 76009 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60213 
(October 5, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2015-67). As specified in the Price 
List and Fee Schedule, a User that incurs co-location fees for a 
particular co-location service pursuant thereto would not be subject 
to co-location fees for the same co-location service charged by the 
Exchange's affiliates New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE LLC'') and 
NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' and, together with NYSE LLC, the 
``Affiliate SROs''). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70176 
(August 13, 2013), 78 FR 50471 (August 19, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-
67).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77071 (Feb. 5, 
2016), 81 FR 7382 (Feb. 11, 2016) (SR-NYSEMKT-2015-89).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange offers the four Partial Cabinet Solution bundles in 
order to attract smaller Users, including those with minimal power or 
cabinet space demands or those for which the costs attendant with 
having a dedicated

[[Page 1768]]

cabinet or greater network connection bandwidth are too burdensome.\7\ 
Under the proposed change, such smaller Users will be able to avail 
themselves of the reduction until December 31, 2017. Specifically, the 
Exchange proposes to modify its Price List and Fee Schedule so that 
they read as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See id at 7384.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Type of service            Description        Amount of charge
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Cabinet Solution        Option A: 1 kW     $7,500 initial charge
 bundles.                        partial cabinet,   per bundle plus
Note: A User and its             1 LCN connection   monthly charge per
 Affiliates are limited to one   (1 Gb), 1 IP       bundle as follows:
 Partial Cabinet Solution        network            For Users
 bundle at a time. A User and    connection (1      that order on or
 its Affiliates must have an     Gb), 2 fiber       before December 31,
 Aggregate Cabinet Footprint     cross              2017: $3,000 monthly
 of 2 kW or less to qualify      connections and    for first 12 months
 for a Partial Cabinet           either the         of service, and
 Solution bundle. See Note 2     Network Time       $6,000 monthly
 under ``General Notes''.        Protocol Feed or   thereafter.
                                 Precision Timing   For Users
                                 Protocol.          that order after
                                Option B: 2 kW      December 31, 2017:
                                 partial cabinet,   $6,000 monthly.
                                 1 LCN connection  $7,500 initial charge
                                 (1 Gb), 1 IP       per bundle plus
                                 network            monthly charge per
                                 connection (1      bundle as follows:
                                 Gb), 2 fiber       For Users
                                 cross              that order on or
                                 connections and    before December 31,
                                 either the         2017: $3,500 monthly
                                 Network Time       for first 12 months
                                 Protocol Feed or   of service, and
                                 Precision Timing   $7,000 monthly
                                 Protocol.          thereafter.
                                                    For Users
                                                    that order after
                                                    December 31, 2017:
                                                    $7,000 monthly.
                                Option C: 1 kW     $10,000 initial
                                 partial cabinet,   charge per bundle
                                 1 LCN connection   plus monthly charge
                                 (10 Gb), 1 IP      per bundle as
                                 network            follows:
                                 connection (10     For Users
                                 Gb), 2 fiber       that order on or
                                 cross              before December 31,
                                 connections and    2017: $7,000 monthly
                                 either the         for first 12 months
                                 Network Time       of service, and
                                 Protocol Feed or   $14,000 monthly
                                 Precision Timing   thereafter.
                                 Protocol.          For Users
                                                    that order after
                                                    December 31, 2017:
                                                    $14,000 monthly.
                                Option D: 2 kW     $10,000 initial
                                 partial cabinet,   charge per bundle
                                 1 LCN connection   plus monthly charge
                                 (10 Gb), 1 IP      per bundle as
                                 network            follows:
                                 connection (10     For Users
                                 Gb), 2 fiber       that order on or
                                 cross              before December 31,
                                 connections and    2017: $7,500 monthly
                                 either the         for first 12 months
                                 Network Time       of service, and
                                 Protocol Feed or   $15,000 monthly
                                 Precision Timing   thereafter.
                                 Protocol.          For Users
                                                    that order after
                                                    December 31, 2017:
                                                    $15,000 monthly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is not proposing any other changes to the Partial 
Cabinet Solution bundles other than this proposed extension of the 50% 
reduction in the MRC. Users that purchase a Partial Cabinet Solution 
bundle would still be subject to a 90-day minimum commitment, after 
which period they are subject to a 60-day rolling time period.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As is the case with all Exchange co-location arrangements, (i) 
neither a User nor any of the User's customers would be permitted to 
submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is 
a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof 
(e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of 
the co-location services proposed herein would be completely voluntary 
and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory basis; \9\ and (iii) 
a User would only incur one charge for the particular co-location 
service described herein, regardless of whether the User connects only 
to the Exchange or to the Exchange and one or both of its 
affiliates.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ As is currently the case, Users that receive co-location 
services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to 
the Exchange's trading and execution systems that is separate from, 
or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent 
to the Exchange enter the Exchange's trading and execution systems 
through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is 
co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users 
do not receive any market data or data service product that is not 
available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location 
services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders 
to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange.
    \10\ See SR-NYSEMKT-2013-67, supra note 5, at 50471. The 
Exchange's affiliates have also submitted substantially the same 
proposed rule change to propose the changes described herein. See 
SR-NYSE-2016-91 and SR-NYSEArca-2016-168.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\11\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, because 
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and 
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market 
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest 
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes provide for 
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 
among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities, and 
are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers, because the Exchange proposes to offer 
the 50% reduction in the MRC to all Users equally. As is currently the 
case, the purchase of any colocation service (including Partial Cabinet 
Solution bundles) is completely voluntary. All Users that order a 
bundle on or before December 31, 2017 would have their MRC reduced by 
50% for the first 12 months.
    The Exchange believes that extending the 50% reduction in the MRC 
for Partial Cabinet Solution bundles is not designed to permit unfair 
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers because 
the Partial Cabinet Solution bundles would continue to offer four 
different Partial Cabinet Solution bundles with options with respect to 
cabinet footprint and network connections. Users that require

[[Page 1769]]

other sizes or combinations of cabinets, network connections and cross 
connects could still request them.
    In addition, the Exchange believes that its proposal would remove 
impediments to, and perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market 
and a national market system and, in general, protects investors and 
the public interest because the proposed extension of the 50% reduction 
in MRC would continue to make it more cost effective for Users to 
utilize co-location by creating a convenient way to create a colocation 
environment, through four Partial Cabinet Solution bundles with options 
with respect to cabinet footprint and network connections. The Exchange 
expects that such Users would include those with minimal power or 
cabinet space demands and Users for which the costs attendant with 
having a dedicated cabinet or greater network connection bandwidth are 
too burdensome.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\13\ in particular, because 
it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and 
other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its 
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, 
issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable that Users that order a 
Partial Cabinet Solution bundle on or before December 31, 2017 would 
have their MRC reduced by 50% for the first 12 months because it is 
reasonable to continue to offer such reduction as an incentive to Users 
to utilize the service. As noted above, the Exchange anticipates that 
Users of the Partial Cabinet Solution bundles would include those with 
minimum power or cabinet space demands and Users for which the costs 
attendant with having a dedicated cabinet or greater network connection 
bandwidth are too burdensome. The Exchange believes that it is 
reasonable to continue to have a reduced minimum commitment period for 
the Partial Cabinet Solution bundle to further reduce the cost 
commitment for such Users as a continued incentive to Users to utilize 
the new service.
    For the reasons above, the proposed changes do not unfairly 
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise 
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements, 
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.
    For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is 
consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\14\ 26 the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act because, in addition to the proposed services being 
completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis 
(i.e. the same products and services are available to all Users, and 
the extension of the 50% reduction for the MRC for the Partial Cabinet 
Solution bundles would apply to all Users).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that extending the 50% reduction in the MRC 
will not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because such 
access will continue to satisfy User demand for cost effective options 
for smaller Users that choose to utilize co-location. All Users that 
order a bundle on or before December 31, 2017 would have their MRC 
reduced by 50% for the first 12 months. Providing entities with the 
additional option of the Partial Cabinet Solution bundle will allow 
them to select the relationship and type of service that better 
corresponds to their needs and resources.
    The proposed changes will also enhance competition by making it 
more cost effective for Users that purchase a Partial Cabinet Solution 
bundle to utilize co-location by creating a convenient way to create a 
colocation environment, through Partial Cabinet Solution bundles with 
options with respect to cabinet footprint and network connections at a 
reduced MRC for the first 12 months. Such Users may choose to pass on 
such cost savings to their customers.
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which 
exchanges offer co-location services as a means to facilitate the 
trading and other market activities of those market participants who 
believe that co-location enhances the efficiency of their operations. 
Accordingly, fees charged for co-location services are constrained by 
the active competition for the order flow of, and other business from, 
such market participants. If a particular exchange charges excessive 
fees for co-location services, affected market participants will opt to 
terminate their co-location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt 
a possible range of alternative strategies, including placing their 
servers in a physically proximate location outside the exchange's data 
center (which could be a competing exchange), or pursuing strategies 
less dependent upon the lower exchange-to-participant latency 
associated with co-location. Accordingly, the exchange charging 
excessive fees would stand to lose not only co-location revenues but 
also the liquidity of the formerly co-located trading firms, which 
could have additional follow-on effects on the market share and revenue 
of the affected exchange. In such an environment, the Exchange must 
continually review, and consider adjusting, its services and related 
fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \15\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \16\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \17\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act.

[[Page 1770]]

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-123 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-123. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-123, and should be 
submitted on or before January 27, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-32040 Filed 1-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices                                                       1767

                                                the Regulation NMS Plan to Address                        For the Commission, by the Division of               II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                Extraordinary Market Volatility.12                      Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated             Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                                   Moreover, according to the Exchange,                 authority.20                                           Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                                the proposal would permit it to widen                   Eduardo A. Aleman,                                     Change
                                                Auction Collars under the ‘‘fair and                    Assistant Secretary.                                      In its filing with the Commission, the
                                                orderly’’ provision when the E-Mini                     [FR Doc. 2016–32037 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am]             self-regulatory organization included
                                                S&P 500 Futures are not +/-2% from the
                                                                                                        BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                 statements concerning the purpose of,
                                                prior day’s closing price as of 9:00 a.m.
                                                                                                                                                               and basis for, the proposed rule change
                                                Eastern Time, but widening the Auction
                                                                                                                                                               and discussed any comments it received
                                                Collars would otherwise be warranted.13
                                                                                                        SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                on the proposed rule change. The text
                                                The Exchange also states that the ‘‘fair
                                                                                                        COMMISSION                                             of those statements may be examined at
                                                and orderly’’ provision would be
                                                invoked for unusual circumstances.14                                                                           the places specified in Item IV below.
                                                According to the Exchange, using 2016                   [Release No. 34–79717; File No. SR–                    The Exchange has prepared summaries,
                                                as an example, if the proposed rule had                 NYSEMKT–2016–123]                                      set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
                                                been in place, the Exchange would have                                                                         of the most significant parts of such
                                                widened Auction Collars on only two                     Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE                    statements.
                                                days (i.e., June 24, 2016, the day after                MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and                          A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                the ‘‘Brexit’’ vote, and November 9,                    Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed                    Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                                2016, the day after the U.S. Presidential               Rule Change To Amend the NYSE MKT                      Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                                election).15 Of these two days, the                     Equities Price List and the NYSE Amex                  Change
                                                Exchange would have invoked the ‘‘fair                  Options Fee Schedule To Modify the
                                                and orderly’’ provision only for                        Fees Related to Four Bundles of Co-                    1. Purpose
                                                November 9 because, by 9:00 a.m., the                   Location Services in Connection With                      The Exchange proposes to amend the
                                                futures markets had returned to within                  the Exchange’s Co-Location Services                    Exchange’s Price List and Fee Schedule
                                                2% of the prior day’s closing price.16                                                                         to modify the fees related to Partial
                                                However, because of the overall volume                  December 30, 2016.                                     Cabinet Solution bundles in connection
                                                of trading and uncertainty in the market                   Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the               with the Exchange’s co-location
                                                that day, the Exchange believed it was                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the                   services.4 Currently, the Exchange offers
                                                appropriate to widen the Auction                        ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3                 Users 5 that purchase a Partial Cabinet
                                                Collars.17                                              notice is hereby given that, on December               Solution bundle on or before December
                                                   Based on the Exchange’s                                                                                     31, 2016 a 50% reduction in the
                                                                                                        19, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (the
                                                representations, the Commission                                                                                monthly recurring charges (‘‘MRC’’) for
                                                                                                        ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with
                                                believes that the proposed rule change,                                                                        the first 12 months.6 The Exchange now
                                                as modified by Amendment No. 1,                         the Securities and Exchange
                                                                                                                                                               proposes to extend that 50% reduction
                                                would help to promote orderly and                       Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the                    until December 31, 2017. The Exchange
                                                efficient Core Open Auctions on volatile                proposed rule change as described in                   proposes to implement the fee changes
                                                days and would provide transparency                     Items I, II, and III below, which Items                effective January 1, 2017.
                                                on such days regarding the Core Open                    have been prepared by the self-                           The Exchange offers the four Partial
                                                Auction parameters. Based on the                        regulatory organization. The                           Cabinet Solution bundles in order to
                                                foregoing, the Commission finds that the                Commission is publishing this notice to                attract smaller Users, including those
                                                proposed rule change, as modified by                    solicit comments on the proposed rule                  with minimal power or cabinet space
                                                Amendment No. 1, is consistent with                     change from interested persons.                        demands or those for which the costs
                                                Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 18 and the                                                                          attendant with having a dedicated
                                                                                                        I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                rules and regulations thereunder
                                                                                                        Statement of the Terms of the Substance
                                                applicable to a national securities                                                                               4 The Exchange initially filed rule changes
                                                                                                        of the Proposed Rule Change                            relating to its co-location services with the
                                                exchange.
                                                                                                                                                               Securities and Exchange Commission
                                                IV. Conclusion                                             The Exchange proposes to amend the                  (‘‘Commission’’) in 2010. See Securities Exchange
                                                                                                        NYSE MKT Equities Price List (‘‘Price                  Act Release No. 62961 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR
                                                  It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to                                                                         59299 (September 27, 2010) (SR–NYSEAmex–2010–
                                                                                                        List’’) and the NYSE Amex Options Fee
                                                Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,19 that the                                                                        80) (the ‘‘Original Co-location Filing’’). The
                                                proposed rule change (SR–NYSEArca–                      Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to modify                  Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah, New
                                                2016–136), as modified by Amendment                     the fees related to four bundles of co-                Jersey (the ‘‘data center’’) from which it provides
                                                                                                        location services (‘‘Partial Cabinet                   co-location services to Users.
                                                No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved.                                                                               5 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
                                                                                                        Solution bundles’’) in connection with                 services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant
                                                  12 See id. at 71128.                                  the Exchange’s co-location services. The               that requests to receive co-location services directly
                                                  13 See Amendment No. 1, supra note 5.                 Exchange proposes to implement the fee                 from the Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act
                                                                                                                                                               Release No. 76009 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR
                                                  14 See id.
                                                                                                        changes effective January 1, 2017. The                 60213 (October 5, 2015) (SR–NYSEMKT–2015–67).
                                                  15 See id. The Exchange filed proposed rule
                                                                                                        proposed change is available on the                    As specified in the Price List and Fee Schedule, a
                                                changes to temporarily widen Auction Collars for
                                                the Core Open Auction on these two days. See            Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,                   User that incurs co-location fees for a particular co-
                                                                                                        at the principal office of the Exchange,               location service pursuant thereto would not be
                                                Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 78152 (June
                                                                                                                                                               subject to co-location fees for the same co-location
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                24, 2016), 81 FR 42781 (June 30, 2016) (SR–             and at the Commission’s Public                         service charged by the Exchange’s affiliates New
                                                NYSEArca–2016–90) and 79275 (November 9,
                                                2016), 81 FR 80703 (November 16, 2016) (SR–
                                                                                                        Reference Room.                                        York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE LLC’’) and NYSE
                                                                                                                                                               Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ and, together with NYSE
                                                NYSEArca–2016–146).
                                                  16 See Amendment No. 1, supra note 5.
                                                                                                                                                               LLC, the ‘‘Affiliate SROs’’). See Securities Exchange
                                                                                                                                                               Act Release No. 70176 (August 13, 2013), 78 FR
                                                  17 See id.
                                                                                                                                                               50471 (August 19, 2013) (SR–NYSEMKT–2013–67).
                                                  18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).                                 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                  6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77071
                                                  19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                                 2 15 U.S.C. 78a.                                     (Feb. 5, 2016), 81 FR 7382 (Feb. 11, 2016) (SR–
                                                  20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                              3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                  NYSEMKT–2015–89).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:06 Jan 05, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00083   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM   06JAN1


                                                1768                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices

                                                cabinet or greater network connection                      Users will be able to avail themselves of                 modify its Price List and Fee Schedule
                                                bandwidth are too burdensome.7 Under                       the reduction until December 31, 2017.                    so that they read as follows:
                                                the proposed change, such smaller                          Specifically, the Exchange proposes to

                                                            Type of service                                 Description                                                 Amount of charge

                                                Partial Cabinet Solution bundles .....        Option A: 1 kW partial cabinet, 1           $7,500 initial charge per bundle plus monthly charge per bundle as
                                                Note: A User and its Affiliates are            LCN connection (1 Gb), 1 IP                  follows:
                                                  limited to one Partial Cabinet So-           network connection (1 Gb), 2                    • For Users that order on or before December 31, 2017: $3,000
                                                  lution bundle at a time. A User              fiber cross connections and ei-                   monthly for first 12 months of service, and $6,000 monthly
                                                  and its Affiliates must have an              ther the Network Time Protocol                    thereafter.
                                                  Aggregate Cabinet Footprint of 2             Feed or Precision Timing Pro-                   • For Users that order after December 31, 2017: $6,000 month-
                                                  kW or less to qualify for a Partial          tocol.                                            ly.
                                                  Cabinet Solution bundle. See                Option B: 2 kW partial cabinet, 1           $7,500 initial charge per bundle plus monthly charge per bundle as
                                                  Note 2 under ‘‘General Notes’’.              LCN connection (1 Gb), 1 IP                  follows:
                                                                                               network connection (1 Gb), 2                    • For Users that order on or before December 31, 2017: $3,500
                                                                                               fiber cross connections and ei-                   monthly for first 12 months of service, and $7,000 monthly
                                                                                               ther the Network Time Protocol                    thereafter.
                                                                                               Feed or Precision Timing Pro-                   • For Users that order after December 31, 2017: $7,000 month-
                                                                                               tocol.                                            ly.
                                                                                              Option C: 1 kW partial cabinet, 1           $10,000 initial charge per bundle plus monthly charge per bundle as
                                                                                               LCN connection (10 Gb), 1 IP                 follows:
                                                                                               network connection (10 Gb), 2                   • For Users that order on or before December 31, 2017: $7,000
                                                                                               fiber cross connections and ei-                   monthly for first 12 months of service, and $14,000 monthly
                                                                                               ther the Network Time Protocol                    thereafter.
                                                                                               Feed or Precision Timing Pro-                   • For Users that order after December 31, 2017: $14,000
                                                                                               tocol.                                            monthly.
                                                                                              Option D: 2 kW partial cabinet, 1           $10,000 initial charge per bundle plus monthly charge per bundle as
                                                                                               LCN connection (10 Gb), 1 IP                 follows:
                                                                                               network connection (10 Gb), 2                   • For Users that order on or before December 31, 2017: $7,500
                                                                                               fiber cross connections and ei-                   monthly for first 12 months of service, and $15,000 monthly
                                                                                               ther the Network Time Protocol                    thereafter.
                                                                                               Feed or Precision Timing Pro-                   • For Users that order after December 31, 2017: $15,000
                                                                                               tocol.                                            monthly.



                                                  The Exchange is not proposing any                        Exchange or to the Exchange and one or                    equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
                                                other changes to the Partial Cabinet                       both of its affiliates.10                                 fees, and other charges among its
                                                Solution bundles other than this                                                                                     members, issuers and other persons
                                                                                                           2. Statutory Basis
                                                proposed extension of the 50%                                                                                        using its facilities, and are not designed
                                                reduction in the MRC. Users that                              The Exchange believes that the                         to permit unfair discrimination between
                                                purchase a Partial Cabinet Solution                        proposed rule change is consistent with                   customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers,
                                                bundle would still be subject to a 90-day                  Section 6(b) of the Act,11 in general, and                because the Exchange proposes to offer
                                                minimum commitment, after which                            furthers the objectives of Sections                       the 50% reduction in the MRC to all
                                                period they are subject to a 60-day                        6(b)(5) of the Act,12 in particular,                      Users equally. As is currently the case,
                                                rolling time period.8                                      because it is designed to prevent                         the purchase of any colocation service
                                                                                                           fraudulent and manipulative acts and                      (including Partial Cabinet Solution
                                                  As is the case with all Exchange co-                     practices, to promote just and equitable                  bundles) is completely voluntary. All
                                                location arrangements, (i) neither a User                  principles of trade, to foster cooperation                Users that order a bundle on or before
                                                nor any of the User’s customers would                      and coordination with persons engaged                     December 31, 2017 would have their
                                                be permitted to submit orders directly to                  in regulating, clearing, settling,                        MRC reduced by 50% for the first 12
                                                the Exchange unless such User or                           processing information with respect to,                   months.
                                                customer is a member organization, a                       and facilitating transactions in                             The Exchange believes that extending
                                                Sponsored Participant or an agent                          securities, to remove impediments to,                     the 50% reduction in the MRC for
                                                thereof (e.g., a service bureau providing                  and perfect the mechanisms of, a free                     Partial Cabinet Solution bundles is not
                                                order entry services); (ii) use of the co-                 and open market and a national market                     designed to permit unfair
                                                location services proposed herein would                    system and, in general, to protect                        discrimination between customers,
                                                be completely voluntary and available                      investors and the public interest and                     issuers, brokers, or dealers because the
                                                to all Users on a non-discriminatory                       because it is not designed to permit                      Partial Cabinet Solution bundles would
                                                basis; 9 and (iii) a User would only incur                 unfair discrimination between                             continue to offer four different Partial
                                                one charge for the particular co-location                  customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.                  Cabinet Solution bundles with options
                                                service described herein, regardless of                       The Exchange believes that the                         with respect to cabinet footprint and
                                                whether the User connects only to the                      proposed rule changes provide for the                     network connections. Users that require
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  7 See  id at 7384.                                       execution systems through the same order gateway,           10 See SR–NYSEMKT–2013–67, supra note 5, at

                                                  8 See  id.                                               regardless of whether the sender is co-located in the     50471. The Exchange’s affiliates have also
                                                  9 As is currently the case, Users that receive co-       data center or not. In addition, co-located Users do      submitted substantially the same proposed rule
                                                location services from the Exchange will not receive       not receive any market data or data service product       change to propose the changes described herein.
                                                any means of access to the Exchange’s trading and          that is not available to all Users, although Users that   See SR–NYSE–2016–91 and SR–NYSEArca–2016–
                                                execution systems that is separate from, or superior       receive co-location services normally would expect        168.
                                                                                                                                                                       11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
                                                to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent   reduced latencies in sending orders to, and
                                                to the Exchange enter the Exchange’s trading and           receiving market data from, the Exchange.                   12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014    18:06 Jan 05, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000    Frm 00084   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM     06JAN1


                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices                                               1769

                                                other sizes or combinations of cabinets,                   forces, as described below in the                        services, affected market participants
                                                network connections and cross connects                     Exchange’s statement regarding the                       will opt to terminate their co-location
                                                could still request them.                                  burden on competition.                                   arrangements with that exchange, and
                                                   In addition, the Exchange believes                        For these reasons, the Exchange                        adopt a possible range of alternative
                                                that its proposal would remove                             believes that the proposal is consistent                 strategies, including placing their
                                                impediments to, and perfects the                           with the Act.                                            servers in a physically proximate
                                                mechanisms of, a free and open market                                                                               location outside the exchange’s data
                                                                                                           B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                and a national market system and, in                                                                                center (which could be a competing
                                                                                                           Statement on Burden on Competition
                                                general, protects investors and the                                                                                 exchange), or pursuing strategies less
                                                public interest because the proposed                          In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of                 dependent upon the lower exchange-to-
                                                extension of the 50% reduction in MRC                      the Act,14 26 the Exchange believes that                 participant latency associated with co-
                                                would continue to make it more cost                        the proposed rule change will not                        location. Accordingly, the exchange
                                                effective for Users to utilize co-location                 impose any burden on competition that                    charging excessive fees would stand to
                                                by creating a convenient way to create                     is not necessary or appropriate in                       lose not only co-location revenues but
                                                a colocation environment, through four                     furtherance of the purposes of the Act                   also the liquidity of the formerly co-
                                                Partial Cabinet Solution bundles with                      because, in addition to the proposed                     located trading firms, which could have
                                                options with respect to cabinet footprint                  services being completely voluntary,                     additional follow-on effects on the
                                                and network connections. The Exchange                      they are available to all Users on an                    market share and revenue of the affected
                                                expects that such Users would include                      equal basis (i.e. the same products and                  exchange. In such an environment, the
                                                those with minimal power or cabinet                        services are available to all Users, and                 Exchange must continually review, and
                                                space demands and Users for which the                      the extension of the 50% reduction for                   consider adjusting, its services and
                                                costs attendant with having a dedicated                    the MRC for the Partial Cabinet Solution                 related fees and credits to remain
                                                cabinet or greater network connection                      bundles would apply to all Users).
                                                                                                                                                                    competitive with other exchanges.
                                                bandwidth are too burdensome.                                 The Exchange believes that extending
                                                   The Exchange also believes that the                     the 50% reduction in the MRC will not                    C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                proposed rule change is consistent with                    impose any burden on competition that                    Statement on Comments on the
                                                Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,13 in                           is not necessary or appropriate in                       Proposed Rule Change Received From
                                                particular, because it provides for the                    furtherance of the purposes of the Act                   Members, Participants, or Others
                                                equitable allocation of reasonable dues,                   because such access will continue to
                                                                                                           satisfy User demand for cost effective                     No written comments were solicited
                                                fees, and other charges among its
                                                                                                           options for smaller Users that choose to                 or received with respect to the proposed
                                                members, issuers and other persons
                                                                                                           utilize co-location. All Users that order                rule change.
                                                using its facilities and does not unfairly
                                                discriminate between customers,                            a bundle on or before December 31,                       III. Date of Effectiveness of the
                                                issuers, brokers or dealers.                               2017 would have their MRC reduced by                     Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
                                                   The Exchange believes that it is                        50% for the first 12 months. Providing                   Commission Action
                                                reasonable that Users that order a Partial                 entities with the additional option of the
                                                Cabinet Solution bundle on or before                       Partial Cabinet Solution bundle will                        The foregoing rule change is effective
                                                December 31, 2017 would have their                         allow them to select the relationship                    upon filing pursuant to Section
                                                MRC reduced by 50% for the first 12                        and type of service that better                          19(b)(3)(A) 15 of the Act and
                                                months because it is reasonable to                         corresponds to their needs and                           subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 16
                                                continue to offer such reduction as an                     resources.                                               thereunder, because it establishes a due,
                                                incentive to Users to utilize the service.                    The proposed changes will also                        fee, or other charge imposed by the
                                                As noted above, the Exchange                               enhance competition by making it more                    Exchange.
                                                anticipates that Users of the Partial                      cost effective for Users that purchase a                    At any time within 60 days of the
                                                Cabinet Solution bundles would include                     Partial Cabinet Solution bundle to                       filing of such proposed rule change, the
                                                those with minimum power or cabinet                        utilize co-location by creating a                        Commission summarily may
                                                space demands and Users for which the                      convenient way to create a colocation                    temporarily suspend such rule change if
                                                costs attendant with having a dedicated                    environment, through Partial Cabinet                     it appears to the Commission that such
                                                cabinet or greater network connection                      Solution bundles with options with                       action is necessary or appropriate in the
                                                bandwidth are too burdensome. The                          respect to cabinet footprint and network                 public interest, for the protection of
                                                Exchange believes that it is reasonable                    connections at a reduced MRC for the                     investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
                                                to continue to have a reduced minimum                      first 12 months. Such Users may choose                   the purposes of the Act. If the
                                                commitment period for the Partial                          to pass on such cost savings to their                    Commission takes such action, the
                                                Cabinet Solution bundle to further                         customers.                                               Commission shall institute proceedings
                                                reduce the cost commitment for such                           The Exchange operates in a highly                     under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 17 of the Act to
                                                Users as a continued incentive to Users                    competitive market in which exchanges                    determine whether the proposed rule
                                                to utilize the new service.                                offer co-location services as a means to                 change should be approved or
                                                   For the reasons above, the proposed                     facilitate the trading and other market                  disapproved.
                                                changes do not unfairly discriminate                       activities of those market participants
                                                                                                                                                                    IV. Solicitation of Comments
                                                between or among market participants                       who believe that co-location enhances
                                                that are otherwise capable of satisfying                   the efficiency of their operations.                        Interested persons are invited to
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                any applicable co-location fees,                           Accordingly, fees charged for co-                        submit written data, views, and
                                                requirements, terms and conditions                         location services are constrained by the                 arguments concerning the foregoing,
                                                established from time to time by the                       active competition for the order flow of,                including whether the proposed rule
                                                Exchange.                                                  and other business from, such market                     change is consistent with the Act.
                                                   Finally, the Exchange believes that it                  participants. If a particular exchange
                                                is subject to significant competitive                      charges excessive fees for co-location                     15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                                                                                                                                      16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
                                                  13 15   U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).                                  14 15   U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).                                17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014      18:06 Jan 05, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00085     Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM     06JAN1


                                                1770                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices

                                                Comments may be submitted by any of                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                  Applicant’s Address: 44 River Road,
                                                the following methods:                                    COMMISSION                                             Suite A, Wayland, Massachusetts 01778.
                                                Electronic Comments                                                                                              AllianceBernstein Income Fund, Inc.
                                                                                                          [Release No. IC–32407]                                 [File No. 811–05207]
                                                   • Use the Commission’s Internet
                                                                                                          Notice of Applications For                                Summary: Applicant, a closed-end
                                                comment form (http://www.sec.gov/                                                                                investment company, seeks an order
                                                rules/sro.shtml); or                                      Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of the
                                                                                                          Investment Company Act of 1940                         declaring that it has ceased to be an
                                                   • Send an email to rule-comments@                                                                             investment company. Applicant has
                                                sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–                      December 30, 2016.                                     transferred its assets to AB Income
                                                NYSEMKT–2016–123 on the subject                             The following is a notice of                         Fund, a series of AB Bond Fund, Inc.,
                                                line.                                                     applications for deregistration under                  and, on April 22, 2016, made a final
                                                                                                          section 8(f) of the Investment Company                 distribution to its shareholders based on
                                                Paper Comments                                                                                                   net asset value. Expenses of $723,279
                                                                                                          Act of 1940 for the month of December
                                                  • Send paper comments in triplicate                     2016. A copy of each application may be                incurred in connection with the
                                                to Secretary, Securities and Exchange                     obtained via the Commission’s Web site                 reorganization were paid by applicant
                                                Commission, 100 F Street NE.,                             by searching for the file number, or for               and applicant’s investment adviser.
                                                                                                          an applicant using the Company name                       Filing Date: The application was filed
                                                Washington, DC 20549–1090.
                                                                                                          box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/                     on November 18, 2016.
                                                All submissions should refer to File No.                  search.htm or by calling (202) 551–                       Applicant’s Address: 1345 Avenue of
                                                SR–NYSEMKT–2016–123. This file                            8090. An order granting each                           the Americas, New York, NY 10105.
                                                number should be included on the                          application will be issued unless the                  Destra Investment Trust II [File No.
                                                subject line if email is used. To help the                SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons               811–22523]
                                                Commission process and review your                        may request a hearing on any
                                                comments more efficiently, please use                                                                               Summary: Applicant seeks an order
                                                                                                          application by writing to the SEC’s                    declaring that it has ceased to be an
                                                only one method. The Commission will                      Secretary at the address below and                     investment company. Applicant has
                                                post all comments on the Commission’s                     serving the relevant applicant with a                  transferred its assets to Destra
                                                Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/                    copy of the request, personally or by                  Investment Trust, and, on September 30,
                                                rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the                           mail. Hearing requests should be                       2016, made a final distribution to its
                                                submission, all subsequent                                received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on                    shareholders based on net asset value.
                                                amendments, all written statements                        January 24, 2017, and should be                        Expenses of $32,000 incurred in
                                                with respect to the proposed rule                         accompanied by proof of service on                     connection with the reorganization were
                                                change that are filed with the                            applicants, in the form of an affidavit or,            paid by applicant’s investment adviser.
                                                Commission, and all written                               for lawyers, a certificate of service.                    Filing Date: The application was filed
                                                communications relating to the                            Pursuant to Rule 0–5 under the Act,                    on November 22, 2016.
                                                proposed rule change between the                          hearing requests should state the nature                  Applicant’s Address: One North
                                                Commission and any person, other than                     of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing            Wacker Drive, 48th Floor, Chicago, IL
                                                those that may be withheld from the                       upon the desirability of a hearing on the              60606.
                                                public in accordance with the                             matter, the reason for the request, and
                                                                                                          the issues contested. Persons who wish                 Realty Capital Income Funds Trust
                                                provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
                                                                                                          to be notified of a hearing may request                [File No. 811–22785]
                                                available for Web site viewing and
                                                printing in the Commission’s Public                       notification by writing to the                            Summary: Applicant seeks an order
                                                Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,                         Commission’s Secretary.                                declaring that it has ceased to be an
                                                Washington, DC 20549 on official                          ADDRESS: The Commission: Secretary,                    investment company. Applicant has
                                                business days between the hours of                        U.S. Securities and Exchange                           transferred its assets to SCM Trust, and,
                                                10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such                   Commission, 100 F Street NE.,                          on November 7, 2016, made a final
                                                filing also will be available for                         Washington, DC 20549–1090.                             distribution to its shareholders based on
                                                inspection and copying at the principal                                                                          net asset value. Expenses of $82,000
                                                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                office of the Exchange. All comments                                                                             incurred in connection with the
                                                                                                          Hae-Sung Lee, Attorney-Adviser, at                     reorganization were paid by applicant’s
                                                received will be posted without change;                   (202) 551–7345 or Chief Counsel’s
                                                the Commission does not edit personal                                                                            investment adviser.
                                                                                                          Office at (202) 551–6821; SEC, Division                   Filing Date: The application was filed
                                                identifying information from                              of Investment Management, Chief                        on November 22, 2016.
                                                submissions. You should submit only                       Counsel’s Office, 100 F Street NE.,                       Applicant’s Address: 405 Park
                                                information that you wish to make                         Washington, DC 20549–8010.                             Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY
                                                available publicly. All submissions                                                                              10022.
                                                should refer to File No. SR–NYSEMKT–                      Davlin Philanthropic Funds [File No.
                                                2016–123, and should be submitted on                      811–22178]                                             AIP Series Trust [File No. 811–22789]
                                                or before January 27, 2017.                                  Summary: Applicant seeks an order                      Summary: Applicant seeks an order
                                                  For the Commission, by the Division of                  declaring that it has ceased to be an                  declaring that it has ceased to be an
                                                Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated                investment company. On September 30,                   investment company. On May 25, 2016,
                                                                                                          2016, applicant made a liquidating
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                authority.18                                                                                                     applicant made a liquidating
                                                                                                          distribution to its shareholders, based                distribution to its shareholders, based
                                                Eduardo A. Aleman,
                                                                                                          on net asset value. Expenses of $5,159                 on net asset value. Expenses of $9,264
                                                Assistant Secretary.                                      incurred in connection with the                        incurred in connection with the
                                                [FR Doc. 2016–32040 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am]                liquidation were paid by applicant’s                   liquidation were paid by applicant.
                                                BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                    investment adviser.                                       Filing Dates: The application was
                                                                                                             Filing Date: The application was filed              filed on October 28, 2016, and amended
                                                  18 17   CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                            on October 18, 2016.                                   on November 28, 2016.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014     18:06 Jan 05, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00086   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM   06JAN1



Document Created: 2017-01-06 01:30:22
Document Modified: 2017-01-06 01:30:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation82 FR 1767 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR