82 FR 18061 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Amending the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Its Ultimate Parent Company, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 71 (April 14, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 71 (April 14, 2017)
| Page Range | 18061-18067 | |
| FR Document | 2017-07530 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 71 (Friday, April 14, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 18061-18067] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-07530] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-80417; File No. SR-NYSENAT-2017-01] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Amending the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Its Ultimate Parent Company, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. April 10, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on March 28, 2017, NYSE National, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE National'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self- regulatory organization. On April 6, 2017, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposal.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \4\ Amendment No. 1 clarifies that ICE is a public company listed on the NYSE and that the word ``indirect'' is proposed to be deleted from clause (iii)(y) of the first sentence of Section 2.13(b) of ICE's bylaws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of its ultimate parent company, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (``ICE''), to (1) update and streamline references to ICE subsidiaries that either are or control national securities exchanges and delete references to other subsidiaries of ICE; (2) eliminate an obsolete cross-reference in ICE's certificate of incorporation to its bylaws and make a technical correction to a cross-reference within the bylaws; (3) make certain simplifying or clarifying changes in ICE's bylaws relating to the location of stockholder meetings, quorum requirements, and requirements applicable to persons entitled to nominate directors or make proposals at a meeting of ICE's stockholders; and (4) replace obsolete references in the bylaws to the Vice Chair with references to the lead independent director. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend ICE's Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the ``ICE Certificate'') and Seventh Amended and Restated Bylaws (the ``ICE Bylaws'') to (1) update and streamline references to ICE subsidiaries that either are or control national securities exchanges and delete references to other subsidiaries of ICE; (2) eliminate an obsolete cross-reference in the ICE [[Page 18062]] Certificate to the ICE Bylaws and make a technical correction to a cross-reference within the ICE Bylaws; (3) make certain simplifying or clarifying changes in the ICE Bylaws relating to the location of stockholder meetings, quorum requirements, and requirements applicable to persons entitled to nominate directors or make proposals at a meeting of ICE's stockholders; and (4) replace obsolete references in the ICE Bylaws to the Vice Chair with references to the lead independent director. ICE owns 100% of the equity interest in Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. (``ICE Holdings''), which in turn owns 100% of the equity interest in NYSE Holdings LLC (``NYSE Holdings''). NYSE Holdings owns 100% of the equity interest of NYSE Group, Inc. (``NYSE Group''), which in turn directly owns 100% of the equity interest of the Exchange and its national securities exchange affiliates, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''), NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca''), and NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT'').\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ ICE is a publicly traded company listed on the NYSE. The Exchange's affiliates NYSE, NYSE MKT, and NYSE Arca have each submitted substantially the same proposed rule change to propose the changes described herein. See SR-NYSE-2017-13, SR-NYSEMKT-2017-17, and SR-NYSEArca-2017-29. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ICE Certificate The Exchange proposes to amend the limitations on voting and ownership in Article V of the ICE Certificate to update and streamline references to ICE subsidiaries that are national securities exchanges or that control national securities exchanges, as well as to delete references to other subsidiaries of ICE. In addition, it proposes to revise the amendment provision in Article X of the ICE Certificate to remove an obsolete reference. Limitations on Voting and Ownership Article V of the ICE Certificate establishes voting limitations and ownership concentration limitations on owners of ICE common stock above certain thresholds for so long as ICE owns any U.S. Regulated Subsidiary. By reference to the ICE Bylaws, ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' is defined to mean the four national securities exchanges owned by ICE (the Exchange, NYSE, NYSE Arca, and NYSE MKT), NYSE Arca, LLC, and NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca Equities''), or their successors, in each case to the extent that such entities continue to be controlled, directly or indirectly, by ICE.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ ICE Certificate, Article V, Section A.10; ICE Bylaws, Article III, Section 3.15. NYSE Arca, LLC, is a subsidiary of NYSE Group, and NYSE Arca Equities is a subsidiary of NYSE Arca. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article V of the ICE Certificate also authorizes ICE's Board of Directors to grant exceptions to the voting and ownership concentration limitations if the Board of Directors makes certain determinations. Those include determinations that such an exception would not impair the ability of ICE, the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries, ICE Holdings, NYSE Holdings, and NYSE Group to perform their respective responsibilities under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, and that such an exception is otherwise in the best interests of ICE, its stockholders and the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries. NYSE National proposes to amend Article V to replace references to the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries with references to the ``Exchanges.'' An ``Exchange'' would be defined as a national securities exchange registered under Section 6 of the Exchange Act \7\ that is directly or indirectly controlled by ICE.\8\ Accordingly, Article V would no longer include references to NYSE Arca, LLC or NYSE Arca Equities. NYSE National believes omitting such entities is appropriate because the Exchange Act definition of ``exchange'' states that ``exchange'' ``includes the market place and the market facilities maintained by such exchange.'' \9\ In addition, NYSE Arca, as the national securities exchange, has the regulatory and self-regulatory responsibility for the NYSE Arca options and equities markets.\10\ Moreover, the proposed change would align Article V with voting and ownership concentration limits in the certificates of incorporation of other publicly traded companies that own one or more national securities exchanges, which do not include references to subsidiaries other than national securities exchanges.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. \8\ See proposed Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (``Proposed ICE Certificate''), Article V, Section A.3(a). \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(1). \10\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 3.4 (``The NYSE Arca, Inc. (`NYSE Arca Parent'), as a self-regulatory organization registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 6 of the Exchange Act, shall have ultimate responsibility in the administration and enforcement of rules governing the operation of its subsidiary, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (`Corporation')''). See also NYSE Arca Equities Rule 14.1. \11\ See Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of CBOE Holdings, Inc. (``CBOE Certificate''), Article Sixth, Sections (a)(ii)(A) and (b)(ii)(A) (referencing ``Regulated Securities Exchange Subsidiaries''); and Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Bats Global Markets, Inc. (``Bats Certificate''), Article Fifth, Section (b)(i) and (ii) (referencing ``Exchanges''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As noted above, Article V of the ICE Certificate authorizes ICE's Board of Directors to grant exceptions to the voting and ownership concentration limitations if it makes certain determinations. Such determinations include that the proposed exception would not impair the ability of ICE Holdings, NYSE Holdings and NYSE Group to perform their respective responsibilities under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.\12\ NYSE National proposes to amend Article V to replace the references to ICE Holdings, NYSE Holdings and NYSE Group with the defined term ``Intermediate Holding Companies.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ ICE Certificate, Article V, Sections A.3(a)(i) and B.3(a)(i). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, Article V includes lengthy provisions listing the different categories of members and permit holders of each of the NYSE, NYSE MKT and NYSE Arca.\13\ NYSE National proposes to use a new defined term, ``Member,'' to mean a person that is a ``member'' of an Exchange within the meaning of Section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act.\14\ NYSE National believes that using ``Member'' in place of the list of categories of members and permit holders would simplify the provisions and avoid Exchange-by-Exchange descriptions without substantive change. Each of the categories listed--an ETP Holder of NYSE Arca Equities (as defined in the NYSE Arca Equities rules of NYSE Arca); an OTP Holder or OTP Firm of NYSE Arca (each as defined in the rules of NYSE Arca); a ``member'' or ``member organization'' of NYSE (as defined in the rules of the NYSE) and NYSE MKT \15\--is a ``member'' of an exchange within the meaning of Section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See ICE Certificate, Article V, Section A.3(c)(ii) and (d)(ii) and Section A.9. \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(3)(A). \15\ See id. \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(3)(A). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- More specifically, the revised ICE Certificate would require, in the case of a person seeking approval to exercise voting rights in excess of 20% of the outstanding votes, that neither such person nor any of its related persons be a Member of an Exchange, instead of referring to the different categories of membership recognized by each Exchange.\17\ Similarly, the conditions relating to a person seeking approval to exceed the ownership concentration limitation would be rephrased in the same way.\18\ Use of ``Member'' would [[Page 18063]] permit a simplification, without substantive change, of the portion of the definition of the term ``Related Persons'' relating to members and trading permit holders.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Proposed ICE Certificate, Article V, Section A.3(c)(ii) and (d)(ii). \18\ See Proposed ICE Certificate, Article V, Section B.3(d). \19\ See Proposed ICE Certificate, Article V, Section A.10. For the current definition of ``Related Persons,'' see ICE Certificate, Article V, Section A.9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NYSE National believes that the use of ``Member'' and the changes to remove the Exchange-by-Exchange lists of categories of Members would be appropriate because it would align the provision in the ICE Certificate with voting and ownership concentration limits in the certificates of incorporation of other publicly traded companies that own one or more national securities exchanges, which use a similar description of membership.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See Bats Certificate, Article Fifth, Sections (a)(ii)(D) and (E) (defining an ``Exchange Member'' as ``a Person that is a registered broker or dealer that has been admitted to membership in any national securities exchange registered under Section 6 of the Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission . . . that is a direct or indirect subsidiary of'' Bats Global Markets, Inc.); and CBOE Certificate, Article Sixth, Sections (a)(ii)(C)(y) and (b)(ii)(D) (defining a ``Trading Permit Holder'' ``as defined in the Bylaws of any Regulated Securities Exchange Subsidiary as they may be amended from time to time''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To implement the proposed changes, NYSE National proposes the following amendments to Article V of the ICE Certificate:In Article V, Section A.1, the text ``any U.S. Regulated Subsidiary (as defined below)'' would be replaced with ``a national securities exchange registered under Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the `Exchange Act').'' In Article V, Section A.2, the text ``Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the `Exchange Act'),'' would be replaced with ``Exchange Act.'' In Article V, Section A.3(a), the text ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiary'' would be replaced with the text ``national securities exchange registered under Section 6 of the Exchange Act that is directly or indirectly controlled by the Corporation (each such national securities exchange so controlled, an `Exchange'), any entity controlled by the Corporation that is not itself an Exchange but that directly or indirectly controls an Exchange (each such controlling entity, an `Intermediate Holding Company') or''; the text ``, Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. (`ICE Holdings'), NYSE Holdings LLC (`NYSE Holdings') or NYSE Group, Inc. (`NYSE Group') (if and to the extent that NYSE Group continues to exist as a separate entity)'' would be deleted; and ``the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' would be replaced with ``each Exchange.'' In Article V, Section A.3(c), ``and'' would be added between (i) and (ii); the text ``NYSE Arca, Inc. (`NYSE Arca') or NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (`NYSE Arca Equities') or any facility of NYSE Arca'' would be replaced with ``one or more Exchanges''; and the text ``a Member (as defined below) of any Exchange'' would replace the text from ``an ETP Holder (as defined in the NYSE Arca Equities rules of NYSE Arca'' through the end of the paragraph. In Article V, Section A.3(d), ``and'' would be added between (i) and (ii); the text ``NYSE Arca or NYSE Arca Equities or any facility of NYSE Arca'' would be replaced with ``one or more Exchanges''; and the text ``a Member of any Exchange'' would replace the text from ``an ETP Holder'' through the end of the paragraph. The definition of ``Member'' would be added as new Article V, Section A.8, defined to ``mean a Person that is a `member' of an Exchange within the meaning of Section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act.'' Article V, Sections A.8 and A.9 would be renumbered as Sections A.9 and A.10, respectively. In Article V, Section A.9 (which would be renumbered A.10), the definition of the term ``Related Person'' would be simplified to eliminate the Exchange-by-Exchange definition, as follows: [cir] In Section A.10(d), the text ```member organization' (as defined in the rules of New York Stock Exchange, as such rules may be in effect from time to time), any `member' (as defined in the rules of New York Stock Exchange, as such rules may be in effect from time to time)'' would be replaced with ``Member, any Person''; [cir] In Section A.10(e), the text ``an OTP Firm, any OTP Holder that is associated with such Person'' would be replaced with ``natural person and is a Member, any broker or dealer that is also a Member with which such Person is associated''; [cir] ``and'' would be added between Sections A.10(g) and (h); and [cir] Sections A.10(i) through (l) would be deleted. The definition of ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiary'' and ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' in Article V, Section A.10 would be deleted. In Article V, Section B.1, the term ``Exchange'' would replace the term ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiary.'' In Article V, Section B.3(a), the text ``Exchange, Intermediate Holding Company or'' would replace the text ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries,''; the text ``ICE Holdings, NYSE Holdings or NYSE Group (if and to the extent that NYSE Group continues to exist as a separate entity)'' would be deleted; and ``each Exchange'' would replace ``the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries.'' In Article V, Section B.3(d), the text ``NYSE Arca or NYSE Arca Equities or any facility of NYSE Arca'' would be replaced with ``any Exchange''; and the text ``an ETP Holder'' through the end of the paragraph would be replaced with ``a Member of any Exchange.'' The word ``and'' would be added between Article V, Section B.3(c) and (d); and Article V, Section B.3(e) and (f) would be deleted. Amendments In addition to the amendments to Article V, NYSE National proposes to amend Article X (Amendments) of the ICE Certificate. Clause (A) of Article X requires the vote of 80% of all outstanding shares entitled to vote in order to reduce the voting requirement set forth in Section 11.2(b) of the ICE Bylaws. However, Section 11.2(b) of the ICE Bylaws was deleted in 2015 after the sale by ICE of the Euronext business.\21\ Accordingly, NYSE National proposes to delete the requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74928 (May 12, 2015), 80 FR 28331 (May 18, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-18). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clause (B) of Article X currently requires that, so long as ICE controls any of the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries, any proposed amendment or repeal of any provision of the ICE Certificate must be submitted to the boards of the NYSE, NYSE Market, NYSE Regulation, NYSE Arca, NYSE Arca Equities, and NYSE MKT for a determination as to whether such amendment or repeal must be filed with the Commission under Section 19 of the Exchange Act.\22\ NYSE National proposes that, in Clause (B) of Article X, the text ``of the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' would be replaced with ``Exchange''; and ``New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Market, NYSE Regulation, Inc., NYSE Arca, NYSE Arca Equities and NYSE MKT'' would be replaced with ``each Exchange.'' NYSE National believes that the use of ``Exchange'' is appropriate for the reasons discussed above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional Changes The ICE Certificate includes references to NYSE Market (DE), Inc., defined as ``NYSE Market,'' and NYSE Regulation, Inc. (``NYSE Regulation''). NYSE Market and NYSE Regulation were previously parties to a Delegation Agreement whereby the NYSE delegated certain regulatory functions to NYSE Regulation and certain market functions [[Page 18064]] to NYSE Market. The Delegation Agreement was terminated when the NYSE re-integrated its regulatory and market functions. As a result, the two entities ceased being regulated subsidiaries.\23\ NYSE Regulation was subsequently merged out of existence. The proposed changes described above would delete all references to NYSE Market and NYSE Regulation from the ICE Certificate.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75991 (September 28, 2015), 80 FR 59837 (October 2, 2015 (SR-NYSE-2015-27). \24\ See ICE Certificate Article V, Sections A.3(c)(iii) and (d)(iii) and Section B.3(e), and Article X, clause (B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, conforming changes would be made to the title, recitals and signature line of the ICE Certificate. ICE Bylaws The Exchange proposes to make certain amendments to the ICE Bylaws to correspond to the proposed amendments to the ICE Certificate. In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend the ICE Bylaws to make certain changes relating to the location of stockholder meetings, quorum requirements, and requirements applicable to persons entitled to nominate directors or make proposals at a meeting of ICE's stockholders. Finally, it proposes to replace obsolete references to the Vice Chair with references to the lead independent director. Changes Corresponding to the Proposed Amendments to the ICE Certificate The Exchange proposes to make changes to the ICE Bylaws corresponding to the proposed amendments to the ICE Certificate, as described above. First, NYSE National proposes to use ``Exchanges'' in place of ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries,'' as in the proposed changes to the ICE Certificate. Accordingly, it proposes to make the following changes: The definition of ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiary'' in Section 3.15 would be deleted and replaced with a definition of ``Exchange'' that is the same as the definition in the proposed amended ICE Certificate. In Section 3.14(a)(2), the text ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries, NYSE Group, Inc. (``NYSE Group'') (if and to the extent that NYSE Group continues to exist as a separate entity), NYSE Holdings LLC (``NYSE Holdings''), Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. (`ICE Holdings')'' would be replaced with ``Exchanges, any entity controlled by the Corporation that is not itself an Exchange but that directly or indirectly controls an Exchange (each such controlling entity, an `Intermediate Holding Company')''; and the text ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries, NYSE Group (if and to the extent that NYSE Group continues to exist as a separate entity), NYSE Holdings, ICE Holdings'' would be replaced with ``Exchanges, Intermediate Holding Companies.'' In Section 3.14(b)(3), the text ``the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' and ``their'' would be replaced with ``each Exchange'' and ``its,'' respectively. In Article VII, ``the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' would be replaced with ``any Exchange.'' In Sections 3.14(a)(1), 8.1, 8.2, 8.3(b), 8.4, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 11.3, the text ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiary'' and ``of the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' would be replaced with ``Exchange'' and the text ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' would be replaced with ``Exchanges.'' In Sections 8.2(b), 8.4, 9.1, and 9.3, the text ``the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' and ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' would be replaced with ``an Exchange.'' In Section 9.3, the text ``the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries'' would be replaced with ``each Exchange''; ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiary's'' would be replaced with ``Exchange's''; and ``their respective'' would be replaced with ``its.'' In Section 8.1, the text ``New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Arca Equities, Inc., NYSE MKT LLC and NYSE National, Inc. or their successors'' would be replaced with ``any Exchange.'' Similarly, in Section 11.3, the text ``New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Arca Equities, Inc., NYSE MKT LLC and NYSE National, Inc. or the boards of directors of their successors'' would be replaced with ``each Exchange.'' In Sections 8.1 and 8.2, the defined term ``U.S. Subsidiaries' Confidential Information'' would be replaced with ``Exchange Confidential Information,'' with the same meaning except limited to Exchanges. In Section 8.3(b), the text ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiary or any other U.S. Regulated Subsidiary over which such U.S. Regulated Subsidiary has regulatory authority or oversight'' would be replaced with ``Exchange.'' The proposed change would remove the current provision that allows any U.S. Regulated Subsidiary to inspect the books and records of another U.S. Regulated Subsidiary over which the first has regulatory authority or oversight. As a result, the ICE Bylaws would no longer provide that NYSE Arca may inspect the books and records of NYSE Arca Equities or NYSE Arca, LLC. However, the proposed change would have no substantive effect, because NYSE Arca would retain its authority pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rules 14.1 and 14.3.\25\ The national securities exchanges NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca and NYSE National do not have regulatory authority or oversight over each other. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule 14.1(b) provides, among other things, that the books and records of NYSE Arca Equities are subject to the oversight of the NYSE Arca pursuant to the Act, and that the books and records of NYSE Arca Equities shall be subject at all times to inspection and copying by NYSE Arca. NYSE Arca Equities Rule 14.3(a) provides, among other things, that the books and records of NYSE Arca, LLC are deemed to be the books and records of NYSE Arca and NYSE Arca Equities for purposes of and subject to oversight pursuant to the Exchange Act. See also CBOE Holdings, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation, Article Fifteenth (providing that the books and records of a Regulated Securities Exchange Subsidiary shall be subject at all times to inspection by such subsidiary). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article XII of the ICE Bylaws was added in connection with the acquisition of NYSE National, previously National Stock Exchange, Inc., in 2016.\26\ The Exchange proposes to delete Article XII of the ICE Bylaws in its entirety. Because the substance of Article XII would be addressed by the proposed amendments to the ICE Certificate, Article XII would no longer be necessary. Specifically, --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Releases No. 79902 (January 30, 2017) 82 FR 9258 (February 3, 2017) (SR-NSX-2016-16); and 79901 (January 30, 2017), 82 FR 9251 (February 3, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2016-90, SR-NYSEArca2016-167, SR-NYSEMKT-2016-122). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- the substance of Section 12.1(a)(1) of the ICE Bylaws would be addressed in revised Article V, Section A.3.(c)(ii) of the ICE Certificate; the substance of Section 12.1(a)(2) of the ICE Bylaws would be addressed in revised Article V, Section A.3.(d)(ii) of the ICE Certificate; the substance of Section 12.1(b) of the ICE Bylaws would be addressed in revised Article V, Section B.3.(d) of the ICE Certificate; and the substance of Section 12.2 of the ICE Bylaws would be addressed in revised Article X(B) of the ICE Certificate. Meetings of Stockholders In addition to the proposed changes corresponding to the proposed amendments to the ICE Certificate, the Exchange proposes to amend several sections of Article II (Meetings of Stockholders). The Exchange proposes to simplify Section 2.1 of the ICE Bylaws, which relates to the location of stockholder meetings. The revised provision would provide that, as is true now, the [[Page 18065]] location, if any, as well as the decision to hold a stockholder meeting solely by remote communication, would be determined by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of meeting. The proposed changes are as follow: The first sentence would be revised to remove the text ``for the election of directors'', ``in the City of Atlanta, State of Georgia,'' and ``as may be fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors, or at such other place.'' The text ``as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of the meeting.'' would be deleted and ``or may'' would be added in its place. The second sentence would be deleted in its entirety. In the third sentence, the text ``The Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, determine that any meeting of stockholders shall'' and ``as authorized by law'' would be deleted. The word ``solely'' would be added after ``instead be held'' and the text ``, in each case as may be designated by the Board of Directors from time to time and stated in the notice of meeting'' added to the end of the sentence. Section 2.7 relates to the quorum for stockholder meetings. The Exchange proposes to conform the quorum requirements in the ICE Bylaws to those in the ICE Certificate. To do so, it proposes to delete the first three sentences of Section 2.7 and replace it with the sentence ``Section B of Article IX of the certificate of incorporation sets forth the requirements for establishing a quorum at meetings of stockholders of the Corporation.'' Section 2.13(b) sets forth the advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals. The Exchange proposes to make the following changes to Section 2.13(b). In addition to stockholders of record, the ICE Bylaws permit certain beneficial holders (defined as ``Nominee Holders'') to nominate directors or bring other matters for consideration before the Board of Directors meeting. The Exchange proposes to make simplifying wording changes in clause (iii) of the first sentence of Section 2.13(b), as follows: [cir] In clause (x), the text ``stockholder that holds of record stock of the Corporation'' would be amended so that it read [sic] ``stockholder of record.'' [cir] In clause (y), the following text would be deleted: ``holds such''; ```street name'''; ``of such stock and can demonstrate to''; ``indirect''; ``of, and such Nominee Holder's''; and the comma before ``such stock on such matter.'' The revised clause would read as follows: ``is a person (a `Nominee Holder') that beneficially owns stock of the Corporation through a nominee or other holder of record and provides the Corporation with proof of such beneficial ownership, including the entitlement to vote such stock on such matter.'' [cir] In the current third and fourth sentences of Section 2.13(b), the term ``indirect ownership'' would be changed to ``beneficial ownership'' for consistency. The Exchange proposes to add a new defined term, ``Proponent,'' to capture both stockholders and Nominee Holders. Accordingly: [cir] A new sentence would be added to Section 2.13(b)(iii) between the first and second sentences, stating that ``Stockholders and Nominee Holders who bring matters before the annual meeting pursuant to Section 2.13(b)(iii) are hereinafter referred to as `Proponents'.'' [cir] Throughout Section 2.13(b), ``stockholder,'' ``stockholders'' and ``stockholder's'' would be replaced with ``Proponent,'' ``Proponents'' and ``Proponent's,'' respectively. [cir] Throughout Section 2.13(b), ``Proponent'' would replace the phrases ``stockholder or beneficial owner,'' ``stockholder, by such beneficial owner,'' ``stockholder, such beneficial owner,'' ``stockholder and by such beneficial owner, if any,'' and ``stockholder or any beneficial owner on whose behalf a nomination or nominations are being made or business or matter is being proposed.'' The word ``Proponent's'' would replace the phrase ``stockholder's or such beneficial owner's.'' Presently, the requirement for disclosing share ownership appears three times: in the current third sentence, which sets forth the provisions for stockholder notices relating to director nominations, the current fourth sentence, which sets forth the provisions for stockholder notices relating to other matters, and the current fifth sentence, which sets forth the information that a shareholder must include in any stockholder notice. Rather than keep the duplication, Exchange proposes to remove the requirement from the third and fourth sentences and retain the requirement in clause (i) of the fifth sentence. Accordingly, the text ``, the number and class of all shares of each class of stock of the Corporation owned of record and beneficially by such stockholder'' would be deleted from the current third and fourth sentences. In the current fourth sentence, the requirement that a stockholder notice include information regarding any material interest in the matter proposed ``(other than as a stockholder)'' would be clarified by adding ``or beneficial owner of stock'' after ``stockholder'' within the parenthetical, because a Proponent who is a nominee holder is not a stockholder. In clause (i) of the current fifth sentence, the text ``such Proponent or'' would be added before ``any Associated Person.'' Clause (i) of the current sixth sentence sets forth the meaning of ``Associated Person.'' The Exchange proposes to narrow the text to eliminate all beneficial owners of stock held of record or beneficially by the Proponent from the definition, and instead to cover only those beneficial owners on whose behalf the stockholder notice is being delivered. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to replace the text ``stockholder or any beneficial owner on whose behalf a nomination or nominations are being made or business or matter is being proposed,'' with ``Proponent'' and, in clause (i)(x), replace the text ``owned of record or beneficially by such stockholder or by such beneficial owner'' with ``on whose behalf such Proponent is delivering a Stockholder Notice.'' Additional Proposed Changes In addition to the changes proposed above, the Exchange proposes to amend several additional sections of the ICE Bylaws. The ICE Bylaws refer to a ``Vice Chairman of the Board.'' However, the Board of Directors of ICE has not had a Vice Chairman since the sale of the Euronext business in 2014. Accordingly, in Sections 2.9, 3.6(b) and 3.8, the Exchange proposes to replace ``Vice Chairman of the Board'' with ``lead independent director.'' As a result, the lead independent director would preside over meetings of stockholders in the absence of the Chairman of the Board (Section 2.9), have the authority to call a special meeting of the Board of Directors (Section 3.6(b)) and would preside over meetings of the Board of Directors in the absence of the Chairman of the Board (Section 3.8). In Section 3.12, relating to the conduct of meetings of committees of the Board of Directors of ICE, a reference to ``Article II of these Bylaws'' would be corrected to read ``this Article III of these Bylaws.'' Section 3.14 sets forth considerations directors must take into account in discharging their responsibilities as members of the board of directors. The Exchange proposes to amend the last sentence of Section 3.14(c), which limits claims against directors, officers and employees of ICE and against ICE. The [[Page 18066]] revised text would be expanded in scope to apply to any ``past or present stockholder, employee, beneficiary, agent, customer, creditor, community or regulatory authority or member thereof or other person or entity,'' and to protect agents of ICE as well as directors, officers and employees. These changes would conform the provision to the analogous statement in the governing documents of other holding companies of national securities exchanges, which are substantially similar.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ See Amended and Restated Bylaws of Bats Global Markets, Inc., Article XII, Section 12.01; Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of BOX Holdings Group LLC, Article 4, Section 4.12; Bylaws of IEX Group, Inc., Section 34; and Amended and Restated Bylaws of Miami International Holdings, Inc., Article VII, Section 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, conforming changes would be made to the title and date of the ICE Bylaws. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Exchange Act \28\ in general, and with Section 6(b)(1) \29\ in particular, in that it enables the Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its exchange members and persons associated with its exchange members, with the provisions of the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to replace references to the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries and to the NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca, NYSE Arca Equities and NYSE Arca, LLC with references to an ``Exchange'' or the ``Exchanges,'' as appropriate, would contribute to the orderly operation of the Exchange by adding clarity and transparency to the Exchange's rules by eliminating references to entities that are not national securities exchanges in the ICE Certificate and ICE Bylaws. The Exchange Act definition of ``exchange'' states that ``exchange'' ``includes the market place and the market facilities maintained by such exchange.'' \30\ Accordingly, all market places and market facilities maintained by an Exchange would fall within the definition of Exchange and therefore would fall within the scope of the ICE Certificate and ICE Bylaws. The Exchange notes that the proposed change would align Article V of the ICE Certificate with voting and ownership concentration limits in the certificates of incorporation of other publicly traded companies that own one or more national securities exchanges, which do not include references to subsidiaries other than national securities exchanges.\31\ NYSE Arca, as the national securities exchange, would retain the regulatory and self-regulatory responsibility for the NYSE Arca options and equities markets. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(1). \31\ See note 11, supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Similarly, as a result of the proposed use of ``Exchanges'' instead of ``U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries,'' ICE Bylaws Section 8.3 would no longer provide that any U.S. Regulated Subsidiary is authorized to inspect the books and records of another U.S. Regulated Subsidiary over which the first has regulatory authority or oversight, adding further clarity and transparency to the Exchange's rules.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ As noted above, the ICE Bylaws would no longer provide that NYSE Arca may inspect the books and records of NYSE Arca Equities or NYSE Arca, LLC. However, the proposed change would have no substantive effect, because NYSE Arca would retain its authority pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rules 14.1 and 14.3. NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca and NYSE National do not have regulatory authority or oversight over each other, and so the proposed change would have no effect on those entities' rights. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, the proposed use of the defined term ``Member'' in place of the lists of categories of members and permit holders in Article V of the ICE Certificate would simplify the provisions without substantive change, thereby further adding clarity and transparency to the Exchange's rules and aligning the provision in the ICE Certificate with the voting and ownership concentration limits in the certificates of incorporation of other publicly traded companies that own one or more national securities exchanges, which use a similar description of membership.\33\ Similarly, the proposed use of the defined term ``Intermediate Holding Company'' in place of the list of intermediate holding companies in Article V of the ICE Certificate and Section 3.14 of the ICE Bylaws would simplify the provisions without substantive change, thereby further adding clarity and transparency to the Exchange's rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ See note 20, supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For similar reasons, the Exchange also believes that this filing furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act \34\ because the proposed rule change would be consistent with and would create a governance and regulatory structure that is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specifically, the proposed amendments (1) replacing references to the U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries and to the NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca, NYSE Arca Equities and NYSE Arca, LLC with references to an ``Exchange'' or the ``Exchanges,'' as appropriate; (2) using ``Member'' in place of the lists of categories of members and permit holders in Article V of the ICE Certificate; (3) using ``Intermediate Holding Company'' in place of the list of intermediate holding companies in Article V of the ICE Certificate and Section 3.14 of the ICE Bylaws; and (4) removing the ability of a U.S. Regulated Subsidiary to inspect the books and records of other U.S. Regulated Subsidiaries in ICE Bylaws Section 8.3 would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market by simplifying and streamlining the Exchange's rules, thereby ensuring that persons subject to the Exchange's jurisdiction, regulators, and the investing public can more easily navigate and understand the ICE governing documents. The Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to the last sentence of Section 3.14(c) of the ICE Bylaws, which limits claims against directors, officers and employees of ICE and against ICE, would remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest because the proposed changes would conform the provision to the analogous statement in the governing documents of other holding companies of national securities exchanges, which are substantially similar.\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ See Amended and Restated Bylaws of Bats Global Markets, Inc., Article XII, Section 12.01; Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of BOX Holdings Group LLC, Article 4, Section 4.12; Bylaws of IEX Group, Inc., Section 34; and Amended and Restated Bylaws of Miami International Holdings, Inc., Article VII, Section 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to remove references to NYSE Market, NYSE Regulation and the Vice Chairman and to remove the cross reference to Section 11.2(b) of the ICE Bylaws from Article X of the ICE Certificate would remove impediments to, and perfect the [[Page 18067]] mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest because the changes would eliminate obsolete references, thereby reducing potential confusion. Market participants and investors would not be harmed and in fact could benefit from the increased clarity and transparency in the ICE Certificate and ICE Bylaws. Such increased clarity and transparency would ensure that persons subject to the Exchange's jurisdiction, regulators, and the investing public can more easily navigate and understand the ICE governing documents. The Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to Article II of the ICE Bylaws, regarding meetings of stockholders, would also remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest because the changes would increase the clarity of the relevant sections of Article II, thereby reducing potential confusion. Market participants and investors would not be harmed and in fact could benefit from the increased clarity and transparency regarding the location of stockholder meetings and advance notice requirements, and the conformance of the quorum requirements with those in the ICE Certificate, and so would more easily navigate and understand the ICE Bylaws. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. The proposed rule change is not designed to address any competitive issue but rather update and streamline the ICE Certificate and Bylaws, delete obsolete or unnecessary references and make other simplifying or clarifying changes to the ICE governing documents. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will serve to promote clarity and consistency, thereby reducing burdens on the marketplace and facilitating investor protection. The proposed rule change would result in no concentration or other changes of ownership of exchanges. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NYSENAT-2017-01 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSENAT-2017-01. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSENAT-2017-01 and should be submitted on or before May 5, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\36\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-07530 Filed 4-13-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 71 / Friday, April 14, 2017 / Notices 18061
case of an option, its strike price, (c) the For the foregoing reasons, the as modified by Amendment No. 1, from
value of each Oil Interest (in U.S. Commission finds that the proposed interested persons.
dollars), (d) the type (including rule change, as modified by
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
maturity, ticker symbol, or other Amendments No. 2 and No. 3 thereto,
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
identifier) and value of each Treasury is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
the Proposed Rule Change
security and cash equivalent; and (e) the Act 28 and the rules and regulations
amount of cash held in each Fund’s thereunder applicable to a national The Exchange proposes to amend the
portfolio. securities exchange. certificate of incorporation and bylaws
(7) Not more than 10% of the net of its ultimate parent company,
assets of a Fund in the aggregate IV. Conclusion Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ICE’’),
invested in futures contracts shall It is therefore ordered, pursuant to to (1) update and streamline references
consist of futures contracts whose Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,29 to ICE subsidiaries that either are or
principal market is not a member of the that the proposed rule change (SR– control national securities exchanges
ISG or is a market with which the NYSEArca–2016–173), as modified by and delete references to other
Exchange does not have a CSSA. Amendments No. 2 and No. 3 thereto, subsidiaries of ICE; (2) eliminate an
(8) Web site disclosure of each Fund’s obsolete cross-reference in ICE’s
be, and it hereby is, approved.
daily holdings will occur at the same certificate of incorporation to its bylaws
time as the disclosure by the Trust of For the Commission, by the Division of and make a technical correction to a
the daily holdings to Authorized Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.30
cross-reference within the bylaws; (3)
Participants so that all market make certain simplifying or clarifying
participants are provided daily holdings Eduardo A. Aleman,
changes in ICE’s bylaws relating to the
information at the same time.26 Assistant Secretary. location of stockholder meetings,
(9) A minimum of 100,000 Shares of [FR Doc. 2017–07598 Filed 4–13–17; 8:45 am] quorum requirements, and requirements
each Fund will be outstanding at the BILLING CODE 8011–01–P applicable to persons entitled to
commencement of trading on the nominate directors or make proposals at
Exchange. a meeting of ICE’s stockholders; and (4)
(10) All statements and SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE replace obsolete references in the
representations made in the filing COMMISSION bylaws to the Vice Chair with references
regarding (a) the description of the to the lead independent director. The
portfolios of the Funds, (b) limitations [Release No. 34–80417; File No. SR– proposed rule change is available on the
on portfolio holdings or reference assets, NYSENAT–2017–01] Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
or (c) applicability of Exchange listing at the principal office of the Exchange,
rules specified in this filing shall Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE and at the Commission’s Public
constitute continued listing National, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Reference Room.
requirements for listing the Shares on Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
the Exchange. Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Amending II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
(11) The issuer has represented to the the Certificate of Incorporation and Statement of the Purpose of, and
Exchange that it will advise the Bylaws of Its Ultimate Parent Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Exchange of any failure by a Fund to Company, Intercontinental Exchange, Change
comply with the continued listing Inc. In its filing with the Commission, the
requirements. self-regulatory organization included
(12) Pursuant to its obligations under April 10, 2017.
statements concerning the purpose of,
Section 19(g)(1) of the Act, the Exchange Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the and basis for, the proposed rule change
will monitor for compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the and discussed any comments it received
continued listing requirements.27 ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
(13) If a Fund is not in compliance on the proposed rule change. The text
notice is hereby given that, on March of those statements may be examined at
with the applicable listing requirements, 28, 2017, NYSE National, Inc. (the
the Exchange will commence delisting the places specified in Item IV below.
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE National’’) filed The Exchange has prepared summaries,
procedures under NYSE Arca Equities with the Securities and Exchange
Rule 5.5(m). set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the of the most significant parts of such
This approval order is based on all of proposed rule change as described in
the Exchange’s statements and statements.
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
representations, including those set have been prepared by the self- A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
forth above and in Amendments No. 2 regulatory organization. On April 6, Statement of the Purpose of, and the
and No. 3. 2017, the Exchange filed Amendment Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
No. 1 to the proposal.4 The Commission Change
26 See Amendment No. 3, supra note 8.
27 The
is publishing this notice to solicit 1. Purpose
Commission notes that certain other
proposals for the listing and trading of exchange comments on the proposed rule change,
traded products include a representation that the
The Exchange proposes to amend
listing exchange will ‘‘surveil’’ for compliance with 28 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
ICE’s Third Amended and Restated
the continued listing requirements. See, e.g., 29 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Certificate of Incorporation (the ‘‘ICE
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77499 (April Certificate’’) and Seventh Amended and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
30 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1, 2016), 81 FR 20428 (April 7, 2016) (SR–BATS–
2016–04). In the context of this representation, it is
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Restated Bylaws (the ‘‘ICE Bylaws’’) to
the Commission’s view that ‘‘monitor’’ and
2 15 U.S.C. 78a. (1) update and streamline references to
‘‘surveil’’ both mean ongoing oversight of the 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
ICE subsidiaries that either are or
Fund’s compliance with the continued listing 4 Amendment No. 1 clarifies that ICE is a public
control national securities exchanges
requirements. Therefore, the Commission does not company listed on the NYSE and that the word
view ‘‘monitor’’ as a more or less stringent ‘‘indirect’’ is proposed to be deleted from clause
and delete references to other
obligation than ‘‘surveil’’ with respect to the (iii)(y) of the first sentence of Section 2.13(b) of subsidiaries of ICE; (2) eliminate an
continued listing requirements. ICE’s bylaws. obsolete cross-reference in the ICE
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Apr 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM 14APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_18132/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 71 / Friday, April 14, 2017 / Notices 18065
location, if any, as well as the decision the Corporation through a nominee or ‘‘(other than as a stockholder)’’ would
to hold a stockholder meeting solely by other holder of record and provides the be clarified by adding ‘‘or beneficial
remote communication, would be Corporation with proof of such owner of stock’’ after ‘‘stockholder’’
determined by the Board of Directors beneficial ownership, including the within the parenthetical, because a
and stated in the notice of meeting. The entitlement to vote such stock on such Proponent who is a nominee holder is
proposed changes are as follow: matter.’’ not a stockholder.
• The first sentence would be revised Æ In the current third and fourth • In clause (i) of the current fifth
to remove the text ‘‘for the election of sentences of Section 2.13(b), the term sentence, the text ‘‘such Proponent or’’
directors’’, ‘‘in the City of Atlanta, State ‘‘indirect ownership’’ would be changed would be added before ‘‘any Associated
of Georgia,’’ and ‘‘as may be fixed from to ‘‘beneficial ownership’’ for Person.’’
time to time by the Board of Directors, consistency. • Clause (i) of the current sixth
or at such other place.’’ The text ‘‘as • The Exchange proposes to add a sentence sets forth the meaning of
shall be designated from time to time by new defined term, ‘‘Proponent,’’ to ‘‘Associated Person.’’ The Exchange
the Board of Directors and stated in the capture both stockholders and Nominee proposes to narrow the text to eliminate
notice of the meeting.’’ would be Holders. Accordingly: all beneficial owners of stock held of
deleted and ‘‘or may’’ would be added Æ A new sentence would be added to record or beneficially by the Proponent
in its place. The second sentence would Section 2.13(b)(iii) between the first and from the definition, and instead to cover
be deleted in its entirety. second sentences, stating that only those beneficial owners on whose
• In the third sentence, the text ‘‘The ‘‘Stockholders and Nominee Holders behalf the stockholder notice is being
Board of Directors may, in its sole who bring matters before the annual delivered. Accordingly, the Exchange
discretion, determine that any meeting meeting pursuant to Section 2.13(b)(iii) proposes to replace the text
of stockholders shall’’ and ‘‘as are hereinafter referred to as ‘‘stockholder or any beneficial owner on
authorized by law’’ would be deleted. ‘Proponents’.’’ whose behalf a nomination or
The word ‘‘solely’’ would be added after Æ Throughout Section 2.13(b), nominations are being made or business
‘‘instead be held’’ and the text ‘‘, in each ‘‘stockholder,’’ ‘‘stockholders’’ and or matter is being proposed,’’ with
case as may be designated by the Board ‘‘stockholder’s’’ would be replaced with ‘‘Proponent’’ and, in clause (i)(x),
of Directors from time to time and stated ‘‘Proponent,’’ ‘‘Proponents’’ and replace the text ‘‘owned of record or
in the notice of meeting’’ added to the ‘‘Proponent’s,’’ respectively. beneficially by such stockholder or by
end of the sentence. Æ Throughout Section 2.13(b), such beneficial owner’’ with ‘‘on whose
Section 2.7 relates to the quorum for ‘‘Proponent’’ would replace the phrases behalf such Proponent is delivering a
stockholder meetings. The Exchange ‘‘stockholder or beneficial owner,’’ Stockholder Notice.’’
proposes to conform the quorum ‘‘stockholder, by such beneficial
requirements in the ICE Bylaws to those owner,’’ ‘‘stockholder, such beneficial Additional Proposed Changes
in the ICE Certificate. To do so, it owner,’’ ‘‘stockholder and by such In addition to the changes proposed
proposes to delete the first three beneficial owner, if any,’’ and above, the Exchange proposes to amend
sentences of Section 2.7 and replace it ‘‘stockholder or any beneficial owner on several additional sections of the ICE
with the sentence ‘‘Section B of Article whose behalf a nomination or Bylaws.
IX of the certificate of incorporation sets nominations are being made or business The ICE Bylaws refer to a ‘‘Vice
forth the requirements for establishing a or matter is being proposed.’’ The word Chairman of the Board.’’ However, the
quorum at meetings of stockholders of ‘‘Proponent’s’’ would replace the phrase Board of Directors of ICE has not had a
the Corporation.’’ ‘‘stockholder’s or such beneficial Vice Chairman since the sale of the
Section 2.13(b) sets forth the advance owner’s.’’ Euronext business in 2014. Accordingly,
notice requirements for stockholder • Presently, the requirement for in Sections 2.9, 3.6(b) and 3.8, the
proposals. The Exchange proposes to disclosing share ownership appears Exchange proposes to replace ‘‘Vice
make the following changes to Section three times: in the current third Chairman of the Board’’ with ‘‘lead
2.13(b). sentence, which sets forth the independent director.’’ As a result, the
• In addition to stockholders of provisions for stockholder notices lead independent director would
record, the ICE Bylaws permit certain relating to director nominations, the preside over meetings of stockholders in
beneficial holders (defined as ‘‘Nominee current fourth sentence, which sets forth the absence of the Chairman of the
Holders’’) to nominate directors or bring the provisions for stockholder notices Board (Section 2.9), have the authority
other matters for consideration before relating to other matters, and the current to call a special meeting of the Board of
the Board of Directors meeting. The fifth sentence, which sets forth the Directors (Section 3.6(b)) and would
Exchange proposes to make simplifying information that a shareholder must preside over meetings of the Board of
wording changes in clause (iii) of the include in any stockholder notice. Directors in the absence of the Chairman
first sentence of Section 2.13(b), as Rather than keep the duplication, of the Board (Section 3.8).
follows: Exchange proposes to remove the In Section 3.12, relating to the
Æ In clause (x), the text ‘‘stockholder requirement from the third and fourth conduct of meetings of committees of
that holds of record stock of the sentences and retain the requirement in the Board of Directors of ICE, a reference
Corporation’’ would be amended so that clause (i) of the fifth sentence. to ‘‘Article II of these Bylaws’’ would be
it read [sic] ‘‘stockholder of record.’’ Accordingly, the text ‘‘, the number and corrected to read ‘‘this Article III of
Æ In clause (y), the following text class of all shares of each class of stock these Bylaws.’’
would be deleted: ‘‘holds such’’; ‘‘‘street Section 3.14 sets forth considerations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
of the Corporation owned of record and
name’’’; ‘‘of such stock and can beneficially by such stockholder’’ would directors must take into account in
demonstrate to’’; ‘‘indirect’’; ‘‘of, and be deleted from the current third and discharging their responsibilities as
such Nominee Holder’s’’; and the fourth sentences. members of the board of directors. The
comma before ‘‘such stock on such • In the current fourth sentence, the Exchange proposes to amend the last
matter.’’ The revised clause would read requirement that a stockholder notice sentence of Section 3.14(c), which limits
as follows: ‘‘is a person (a ‘Nominee include information regarding any claims against directors, officers and
Holder’) that beneficially owns stock of material interest in the matter proposed employees of ICE and against ICE. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Apr 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM 14APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_18132/page/5.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 71 / Friday, April 14, 2017 / Notices 18067
mechanism of a free and open market C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s public in accordance with the
and a national market system and, in Statement on Comments on the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
general, protect investors and the public Proposed Rule Change Received From available for Web site viewing and
interest because the changes would Members, Participants, or Others printing in the Commission’s Public
eliminate obsolete references, thereby No written comments were solicited Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
reducing potential confusion. Market or received with respect to the proposed Washington, DC 20549 on official
participants and investors would not be rule change. business days between the hours of
harmed and in fact could benefit from 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
the increased clarity and transparency III. Date of Effectiveness of the filing also will be available for
in the ICE Certificate and ICE Bylaws. Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
inspection and copying at the principal
Commission Action
Such increased clarity and transparency office of the Exchange. All comments
would ensure that persons subject to the Within 45 days of the date of received will be posted without change;
Exchange’s jurisdiction, regulators, and publication of this notice in the Federal the Commission does not edit personal
the investing public can more easily Register or up to 90 days (i) as the identifying information from
navigate and understand the ICE Commission may designate if it finds submissions. You should submit only
governing documents. such longer period to be appropriate information that you wish to make
and publishes its reasons for so finding available publicly. All submissions
The Exchange believes that the or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory
proposed amendments to Article II of should refer to File Number SR–
organization consents, the Commission NYSENAT–2017–01 and should be
the ICE Bylaws, regarding meetings of will:
stockholders, would also remove submitted on or before May 5, 2017.
(A) By order approve or disapprove
impediments to, and perfect the the proposed rule change, or For the Commission, by the Division of
mechanism of a free and open market (B) institute proceedings to determine Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
and a national market system and, in whether the proposed rule change authority.36
general, protect investors and the public should be disapproved. Eduardo A. Aleman,
interest because the changes would Assistant Secretary.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
increase the clarity of the relevant [FR Doc. 2017–07530 Filed 4–13–17; 8:45 am]
sections of Article II, thereby reducing Interested persons are invited to
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
potential confusion. Market participants submit written data, views, and
and investors would not be harmed and arguments concerning the foregoing,
in fact could benefit from the increased including whether the proposed rule SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
clarity and transparency regarding the change, as modified by Amendment No.
COMMISSION
location of stockholder meetings and 1, is consistent with the Act. Comments
advance notice requirements, and the may be submitted by any of the
following methods: [Release No. 34–80415; File No. SR–
conformance of the quorum NYSEArca–2017–30]
requirements with those in the ICE Electronic Comments
Certificate, and so would more easily • Use the Commission’s Internet Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
navigate and understand the ICE comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Bylaws. rules/sro.shtml); or Rule Change To Amend Commentary
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s • Send an email to rule-comments@ .01 and Commentary .02 to NYSE Arca
Statement on Burden on Competition sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) To Provide for
NYSENAT–2017–01 on the subject line. the Inclusion of Cash in an Index
The Exchange does not believe that Underlying a Series of Investment
Paper Comments Company Units
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not • Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange April 10, 2017.
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Exchange Act. Commission, 100 F Street NE., Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
The proposed rule change is not Washington, DC 20549–1090. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
designed to address any competitive All submissions should refer to File ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
issue but rather update and streamline Number SR–NYSENAT–2017–01. This notice is hereby given that, on March
the ICE Certificate and Bylaws, delete file number should be included on the 29, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the
obsolete or unnecessary references and subject line if email is used. To help the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
make other simplifying or clarifying Commission process and review your the Securities and Exchange
changes to the ICE governing comments more efficiently, please use Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
documents. The Exchange believes that only one method. The Commission will proposed rule change as described in
the proposed rule change will serve to post all comments on the Commission’s Items I and II below, which Items have
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ been prepared by the self-regulatory
promote clarity and consistency,
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the organization. The Commission is
thereby reducing burdens on the
submission, all subsequent publishing this notice to solicit
marketplace and facilitating investor
amendments, all written statements
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
protection. The proposed rule change comments on the proposed rule change
with respect to the proposed rule
would result in no concentration or from interested persons.
change that are filed with the
other changes of ownership of Commission, and all written
exchanges. communications relating to the 36 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
proposed rule change between the 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Commission and any person, other than 2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
those that may be withheld from the 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Apr 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM 14APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_18132/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-14 00:56:29
Document Modified: 2017-04-14 00:56:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 18061 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR