82_FR_18358 82 FR 18285 - Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2014

82 FR 18285 - Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 73 (April 18, 2017)

Page Range18285-18287
FR Document2017-07807

On October 14, 2016, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR Tires) from People's Republic of China (PRC). This review covers 47 companies, only two of which were selected as mandatory respondents: Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. (Guizhou Tyre) and Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co. Ltd. (Xuzhou Xugong). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. Based on an analysis of the comments received, the Department has made changes to the subsidy rates that were preliminary determined for Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. The final subsidy rates are listed in the ``Final Results of Administrative Review'' section below.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 73 (Tuesday, April 18, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18285-18287]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-913]


Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review; 2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On October 14, 2016, the Department published the preliminary 
results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty order 
on certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR Tires) from People's 
Republic of China (PRC). This review covers 47 companies, only two of 
which were selected as mandatory respondents: Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. 
(Guizhou Tyre) and Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co. Ltd. (Xuzhou Xugong). The 
period of review (POR) is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. 
Based on an analysis of the comments received, the Department has made 
changes to the subsidy rates that were preliminary determined for 
Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. The final subsidy rates are listed in 
the ``Final Results of Administrative Review'' section below.

DATES: Effective April 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chien-Min Yang or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department 
of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 
telephone: (202) 482-5484 or (202) 482-1396.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the scope are new pneumatic tires designed 
for off-the-road (OTR) and off-highway use. The subject merchandise is 
currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4011.20.10.25, 4011.20.10.35, 
4011.20.50.30, 4011.20.50.50, 4011.70.0010, 4011.62.00.00, 
4011.80.1020, 4011.90.10, 4011.70.0050, 4011.80.1010, 4011.80.1020, 
4011.80.2010, 4011.80.2020, 4011.80.8010, and 4011.80.8020. While HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our 
written description of the scope, which is contained in the 
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, is dispositive.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see 
Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald 
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance,'' Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results 
in the Countervailing Duty Review of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-
Road Tires from the People's Republic of China; 2014,'' dated 
concurrently with this notice and herein incorporated by reference 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    The issues raised by Guizhou Tyre, Xuzhou Xugong, Tianjin United 
Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. (TUTRIC), the Government of the 
People's Republic of China (GOC), and Titan Tire Corporation (Titan) 
and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-
CIO-CLC (the USW) (collectively, the petitioners) in their case and 
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ 
The issues are identified in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues 
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and 
in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    The Department published the preliminary results of this 
administrative review of OTR Tires from

[[Page 18286]]

PRC on October 14, 2016.\3\ Based on the comments received from all 
interested parties, we made revisions to some of our benchmark and 
benefit calculations for both Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. For a 
discussion of these issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing 
Duty Administrative Review; 2014, 81 FR 71056 (October 14, 2016) 
(Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each 
of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a 
subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives 
rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 
specific.\4\ For a description of the methodology underlying all of the 
Department's conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and, section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Administrative Review

    In accordance with section 777A(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(5), we determine the total net countervailable subsidy rates 
for the period January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014 for each of 
the mandatory respondents, Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. For the non-
selected respondents, we followed the Department's practice, which is 
to base the subsidy rates on an average of the subsidy rates calculated 
for those companies selected for individual review, excluding de 
minimis rates or rates based on entirely on adverse facts available.\5\ 
In this case, we assigned to the non-selected respondents the simple 
average of the rates calculated for Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. We 
are using a simple, rather than a weighted, average due to inconsistent 
units of measure in the publicly ranged quantity and value data 
provided by Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. For a list of the non-
selected companies, please see Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of 
the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
18806, 18811 (April 13, 2010) unchanged in Certain Pasta from Italy: 
Final Results of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty Adminstrative 
Review, 75 FR 37386 (June 29, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We find the countervaible subsidy rates for the producers/exporters 
under review to be as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                  Manufacturer/exporter                     (percent ad
                                                             valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd...................................           34.46
Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd............................           46.01
Non Selected Companies..................................           40.24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to 
issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. 
The Department will instruct CBP to liquidate shipments of subject 
merchandise produced and/or exported by the companies listed above, 
entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption from January 1, 
2014, through December 31, 2014, at the percent rates, as listed above 
for each of the respective companies, of the entered value.
    The Department intends also to instruct CBP to collect cash 
deposits of estimated countervailing duties, in the amounts shown above 
for each of the respective companies shown above, on shipments of 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of 
this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to 
continue to collect cash deposits at the most-recent company-specific 
or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. 
Accordingly, the cash deposit requirements that will be applied to 
companies covered by this order, but not examined in this 
administrative review, are those established in the most recently 
completed segment of the proceeding for each company. These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    These final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: April 12, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
    A. Allocation Period
    B. Attribution of Subsidies
    C. Denominator
    D. Creditworthiness
V. Benchmarks and Discount Rates
VI. Analysis of Programs
    A. Programs Determined To Be Countervailable
    B. Programs Determined To Be Not Used
    C. Programs Determined To Provide No Benefit During the POR
VII. Analysis of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether to Make Changes in LTAR Calculations
    Comment 2: Whether to Change the Benchmark for Synthetic Rubber
    Comment 3: Whether Brokerage and Handling Costs Should be 
Included in LTAR Benchmarks for Nylon Cord and Carbon Black
    Comment 4: Whether the Department Should Continue To Rely on a 
Tier 2 Benchmark for Nylon Cord
    Comment 5: Whether the ``Well-Know Brand Reward'' Benefit Should 
be Calculated Using Xuzhou Xugong's Total Sales or Export Sales
    Comment 6: Whether the Department Should Make Changes to Land 
Purchases From Affiliates and Calculate a Benefit for Land Parcel #7 
for Guizhou Tyre
    Comment 7: Whether the VAT and Import Duty Exemptions Should be 
Countervailable
    Comment 8: The Sales Denominator Used To Calculate Guizhou Tyre 
and Xuzhou Xugong
    Comment 9: Whether to Countervail Additional Grants to Guizhou 
Tyre
    Comment 10: Whether the Department Should Find the Export 
Buyer's Credit Program Used in This Case
VIII. Conclusion

Appendix II--Companies Not Selected for This Review

1. Air Sea Transport Inc.
2. Beijing Kang Jie Kong Intl Cargo Agent Co Ltd.
3. C&D Intl Freight Forward Inc.
4. Caesar Intl Logistics Co Ltd.
5. CD Intl Freight Forwarding.
6. Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind Ltd.
7. China Intl Freight Co Ltd.
8. Chonche Auto Double Happiness Tyre Corp Ltd.
9. City Ocean Logistics Co Ltd.
10. Consolidator Intl Co Ltd.
11. CTS Intl Logistics Corp.

[[Page 18287]]

12. De Well Container Shipping Inc.
13. England Logistics (Qingdao) Co Ltd.
14. Extra Type Co Ltd.
15. Fedex International Freight Forwarding Services Shanghai Co Ltd.
16. FG Intl Logistic Ltd.
17. JHJ Intl Transportation Co.
18. Kendra Rubber (China) Co Ltd.
19. Landmax Intl Co Ltd.
20. Orient Express Container Co Ltd.
21. Pudong Prime Intl Logistics Inc.
22. Qingdao Aotai Rubber Co Ltd.
23. Qingdao Chengtai Handtruck Co Ltd.
24. Qingdao Chuangtong Founding Co Ltd.
25. Qingdao Ftz Full-World Intl Trading Co Ltd.
26. Qingdao Haomai Hongyi Mold Co Ltd.
27. Qingdao Kaoyoung Intl Logistics Co Ltd.
28. Qingdao Milestone Tyres Co Ltd.
29. Qingdao Nexten Co Ltd.
30. Qingdao Wonderland.
31. Schenker China Ltd.
32. SGL Logistics South China Ltd.
33. Shanghai Grand South Intl Transportation Co Ltd.
34. Shanghai Hua Shen Imp & Exp Co Ltd.
35. Shanghai Part-Rich Auto Parts Co Ltd.
36. Thi Group (Shanghai) Ltd.
37. Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd.
38. Toll Global Forwarding China Ltd.
39. Translink Shipping Inc.
40. Trelleborg Wheel Systems Hebei Co.
41. Universal Shipping Inc.
42. UTI China Ltd.
43. Weiss-Rohlig China Co Ltd.
44. World Bridge Logistics Co Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2017-07807 Filed 4-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 18, 2017 / Notices 18285 instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate of APO materials or conversion to classifiable under Harmonized Tariff entries without regard to antidumping judicial protective order is hereby Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) duties. requested. Failure to comply with the subheadings: 4011.20.10.25, The Department intends to issue the regulations and terms of an APO is a 4011.20.10.35, 4011.20.50.30, appropriate assessment instructions to violation subject to sanction. 4011.20.50.50, 4011.70.0010, CBP 41 days after the date of 4011.62.00.00, 4011.80.1020, publication of these final results of Notification to Interested Parties 4011.90.10, 4011.70.0050, 4011.80.1010, review, in accordance with 19 CFR We intend to issue and publish these 4011.80.1020, 4011.80.2010, 356.8(a). results in accordance with sections 4011.80.2020, 4011.80.8010, and 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 4011.80.8020. While HTSUS Cash Deposit Requirements CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). subheadings are provided for The following deposit requirements convenience and customs purposes, our Dated: April 13, 2017. will be effective upon publication of the written description of the scope, which notice of these final results for all Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement is contained in the accompanying Issues shipments of citric acid and certain and Decision Memorandum, is citrate salts from Canada entered, or and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017–07805 Filed 4–17–17; 8:45 am] dispositive.1 withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Analysis of Comments Received date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of The issues raised by Guizhou Tyre, the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for JBL Xuzhou Xugong, Tianjin United Tire & Canada will be zero; (2) for merchandise DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rubber International Co., Ltd. (TUTRIC), exported by manufacturers or exporters the Government of the People’s International Trade Administration not covered in this review but covered Republic of China (GOC), and Titan Tire in a completed prior segment of the [C–570–913] Corporation (Titan) and the United proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, continue to be the company-specific rate Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Manufacturing, Energy, Allied published for the most recently Tires From the People’s Republic of Industrial and Service Workers completed segment; (3) if the exporter is China: Final Results of Countervailing International Union, AFL–CIO–CLC (the not a firm covered in this review, a prior Duty Administrative Review; 2014 USW) (collectively, the petitioners) in review, or the original investigation but AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, their case and rebuttal briefs are the manufacturer is, the cash deposit International Trade Administration, addressed in the Issues and Decision rate will be the rate established for the Department of Commerce. Memorandum.2 The issues are most recently completed segment for the SUMMARY: On October 14, 2016, the identified in the Appendix to this manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) Department published the preliminary notice. The Issues and Decision the cash deposit rate for all other results of the administrative review of Memorandum is a public document and manufacturers or exporters will the countervailing duty order on certain is on file electronically via Enforcement continue to be 23.21 percent, the all- new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR and Compliance’s Antidumping and others rate established in the Order. Tires) from People’s Republic of China Countervailing Duty Centralized These cash deposit requirements, when (PRC). This review covers 47 Electronic Service System (ACCESS). imposed, shall remain in effect until companies, only two of which were ACCESS is available to registered users further notice. selected as mandatory respondents: at http://access.trade.gov and in the Notification to Importers Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. (Guizhou Tyre) Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the and Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co. Ltd. main Department of Commerce This notice also serves as a final building. In addition, a complete reminder to importers of their (Xuzhou Xugong). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2014, through version of the Issues and Decision responsibility under 19 CFR Memorandum can be accessed directly 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate December 31, 2014. Based on an analysis of the comments received, the on the Internet at http://trade.gov/ regarding the reimbursement of enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed antidumping duties prior to liquidation Department has made changes to the subsidy rates that were preliminary Issues and Decision Memorandum and of the relevant entries during this POR. electronic versions of the Issues and Failure to comply with this requirement determined for Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. The final subsidy rates Decision Memorandum are identical in could result in the Department’s content. presumption that reimbursement of are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of antidumping duties has occurred and Administrative Review’’ section below. Changes Since the Preliminary Results the subsequent assessment of double DATES: Effective April 18, 2017. The Department published the antidumping duties. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: preliminary results of this Chien-Min Yang or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/ administrative review of OTR Tires from Administrative Protective Order CVD Operations, Office VII, In accordance with 19 CFR Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 1 For a full description of the scope of the order, 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as Department of Commerce, 1401 see Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate a reminder to parties subject to Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and administrative protective order (APO) of Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5484 or Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for their responsibility concerning the (202) 482–1396. Enforcement and Compliance,’’ Issues and Decision return or destruction of proprietary Memorandum for the Final Results in the information disclosed under the APO, Scope of the Order Countervailing Duty Review of Certain New which continues to govern business The products covered by the scope are Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People’s Republic of China; 2014,’’ dated concurrently with proprietary information in this segment new pneumatic tires designed for off- this notice and herein incorporated by reference of the proceeding. Timely written the-road (OTR) and off-highway use. (Issues and Decision Memorandum). notification of the return or destruction The subject merchandise is currently 2 Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Apr 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1

18286 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 18, 2017 / Notices PRC on October 14, 2016.3 Based on the Subsidy rate These final results are issued and comments received from all interested Manufacturer/exporter (percent ad published in accordance with sections parties, we made revisions to some of valorem) 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. our benchmark and benefit calculations Dated: April 12, 2017. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd .......... 34.46 for both Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ronald K. Lorentzen, Xugong. For a discussion of these Ltd ..................................... 46.01 Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement issues, see the Issues and Decision Non Selected Companies ..... 40.24 and Compliance. Memorandum. Assessment and Cash Deposit Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in Methodology the Issues and Decision Memorandum Requirements The Department conducted this In accordance with 19 CFR I. Summary review in accordance with section 351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to II. Background 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as issue appropriate instructions to U.S. III. Scope of the Investigation amended (the Act). For each of the IV. Subsidies Valuation Information Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 A. Allocation Period subsidy programs found days after publication of the final results countervailable, we find that there is a B. Attribution of Subsidies of this review. The Department will C. Denominator subsidy, i.e., a government-provided instruct CBP to liquidate shipments of D. Creditworthiness financial contribution that gives rise to subject merchandise produced and/or V. Benchmarks and Discount Rates a benefit to the recipient, and that the exported by the companies listed above, VI. Analysis of Programs subsidy is specific.4 For a description of entered or withdrawn from warehouse, A. Programs Determined To Be the methodology underlying all of the for consumption from January 1, 2014, Countervailable Department’s conclusions, see the Issues through December 31, 2014, at the B. Programs Determined To Be Not Used and Decision Memorandum. C. Programs Determined To Provide No percent rates, as listed above for each of Benefit During the POR Final Results of Administrative Review the respective companies, of the entered VII. Analysis of Comments value. Comment 1: Whether to Make Changes in In accordance with section 777A(e)(1) The Department intends also to LTAR Calculations of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of Comment 2: Whether to Change the determine the total net countervailable estimated countervailing duties, in the Benchmark for Synthetic Rubber subsidy rates for the period January 1, amounts shown above for each of the Comment 3: Whether Brokerage and Handling Costs Should be Included in 2014, through December 31, 2014 for respective companies shown above, on LTAR Benchmarks for Nylon Cord and each of the mandatory respondents, shipments of subject merchandise Carbon Black Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou Xugong. For entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Comment 4: Whether the Department the non-selected respondents, we for consumption on or after the date of Should Continue To Rely on a Tier 2 followed the Department’s practice, publication of the final results of this Benchmark for Nylon Cord which is to base the subsidy rates on an review. For all non-reviewed firms, we Comment 5: Whether the ‘‘Well-Know average of the subsidy rates calculated will instruct CBP to continue to collect Brand Reward’’ Benefit Should be for those companies selected for cash deposits at the most-recent Calculated Using Xuzhou Xugong’s Total company-specific or all-others rate Sales or Export Sales individual review, excluding de Comment 6: Whether the Department minimis rates or rates based on entirely applicable to the company, as Should Make Changes to Land Purchases on adverse facts available.5 In this case, appropriate. Accordingly, the cash From Affiliates and Calculate a Benefit we assigned to the non-selected deposit requirements that will be for Land Parcel #7 for Guizhou Tyre respondents the simple average of the applied to companies covered by this Comment 7: Whether the VAT and Import rates calculated for Guizhou Tyre and order, but not examined in this Duty Exemptions Should be Xuzhou Xugong. We are using a simple, administrative review, are those Countervailable established in the most recently Comment 8: The Sales Denominator Used rather than a weighted, average due to completed segment of the proceeding To Calculate Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou inconsistent units of measure in the Xugong publicly ranged quantity and value data for each company. These cash deposit Comment 9: Whether to Countervail provided by Guizhou Tyre and Xuzhou requirements, when imposed, shall Additional Grants to Guizhou Tyre Xugong. For a list of the non-selected remain in effect until further notice. Comment 10: Whether the Department companies, please see Appendix II. Administrative Protective Order Should Find the Export Buyer’s Credit Program Used in This Case We find the countervaible subsidy This notice also serves as a final VIII. Conclusion rates for the producers/exporters under reminder to parties subject to an review to be as follows: Appendix II—Companies Not Selected administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the for This Review 3 See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary return or destruction of proprietary 1. Air Sea Transport Inc. Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative information disclosed under APO in 2. Beijing Kang Jie Kong Intl Cargo Agent Co Review; 2014, 81 FR 71056 (October 14, 2016) accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), Ltd. (Preliminary Results). which continues to govern business 3. C&D Intl Freight Forward Inc. 4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act proprietary information in this segment 4. Caesar Intl Logistics Co Ltd. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 5. CD Intl Freight Forwarding. of the Act regarding benefit; and, section 771(5A) of proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 6. Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind Ltd. of the Act regarding specificity. 7. China Intl Freight Co Ltd. 5 See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary APO materials or conversion to judicial 8. Chonche Auto Double Happiness Tyre Results of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty protective order is hereby requested. Administrative Review, 75 FR 18806, 18811 (April Corp Ltd. 13, 2010) unchanged in Certain Pasta from Italy: Failure to comply with the regulations 9. City Ocean Logistics Co Ltd. Final Results of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty and terms of an APO is a violation 10. Consolidator Intl Co Ltd. Adminstrative Review, 75 FR 37386 (June 29, 2010). which is subject to sanction. 11. CTS Intl Logistics Corp. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Apr 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 18, 2017 / Notices 18287 12. De Well Container Shipping Inc. Needs and Uses: This request is for action will be effective the date 13. England Logistics (Qingdao) Co Ltd. extension of a currently approved following the end of the comment 14. Extra Type Co Ltd. information collection. The Large period unless comments are received 15. Fedex International Freight Forwarding Pelagic Fishing Survey consists of which result in a contrary Services Shanghai Co Ltd. 16. FG Intl Logistic Ltd. dockside and telephone surveys of determination. The specific date when 17. JHJ Intl Transportation Co. recreational anglers for large pelagic fish this system ceased to be a Privacy Act 18. Kendra Rubber (China) Co Ltd. (tunas, sharks, and billfish) in the System of Records is unknown. 19. Landmax Intl Co Ltd. Atlantic Ocean. The survey provides the ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 20. Orient Express Container Co Ltd. National Marine Fisheries Service identified by docket number and title, 21. Pudong Prime Intl Logistics Inc. (NMFS) with information to monitor by any of the following methods: 22. Qingdao Aotai Rubber Co Ltd. catch of bluefin tuna, marlin and other * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http:// 23. Qingdao Chengtai Handtruck Co Ltd. federally managed species. Catch www.regulations.gov. 24. Qingdao Chuangtong Founding Co Ltd. monitoring in these fisheries and Follow the instructions for submitting 25. Qingdao Ftz Full-World Intl Trading Co comments. Ltd. collection of catch and effort statistics for all pelagic fish is required under the * Mail: Department of Defense, Office 26. Qingdao Haomai Hongyi Mold Co Ltd. 27. Qingdao Kaoyoung Intl Logistics Co Ltd. Atlantic Tunas Convention Act and the of the Deputy Chief Management 28. Qingdao Milestone Tyres Co Ltd. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Officer, Directorate for Oversight and 29. Qingdao Nexten Co Ltd. Conservation and Management Act. The Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 30. Qingdao Wonderland. information collected is essential for the Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09B, Alexandria, 31. Schenker China Ltd. United States (U.S.) to meet its reporting VA 22350–1700. 32. SGL Logistics South China Ltd. obligations to the International Instructions: All submissions received 33. Shanghai Grand South Intl Commission for the Conservation of must include the agency name and Transportation Co Ltd. docket number for this Federal Register 34. Shanghai Hua Shen Imp & Exp Co Ltd. Atlantic Tuna. Affected Public: Business or other for- document. The general policy for 35. Shanghai Part-Rich Auto Parts Co Ltd. comments and other submissions from 36. Thi Group (Shanghai) Ltd. profit organizations. Frequency: Annually, weekly or on members of the public is to make these 37. Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. occasion. submissions available for public 38. Toll Global Forwarding China Ltd. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. viewing on the Internet at http:// 39. Translink Shipping Inc. This information collection request www.regulations.gov as they are 40. Trelleborg Wheel Systems Hebei Co. may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow received without change, including any 41. Universal Shipping Inc. the instructions to view Department of personal identifiers or contact 42. UTI China Ltd. Commerce collections currently under information. 43. Weiss-Rohlig China Co Ltd. review by OMB. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 44. World Bridge Logistics Co Ltd. Written comments and submit general questions about the [FR Doc. 2017–07807 Filed 4–17–17; 8:45 am] recommendations for the proposed rescinded system, please contact Mrs. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P information collection should be sent Luz D. Ortiz, Chief, Records, Privacy within 30 days of publication of this and Declassification Division (RPDD), notice to OIRA_Submission@ 1155 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 20301–1155, or by phone at (571) 372– National Oceanic and Atmospheric Dated: April 12, 2017. 0478. Administration Sarah Brabson, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Based on a NOAA PRA Clearance Officer. recent program review, it was Submission for OMB Review; [FR Doc. 2017–07756 Filed 4–17–17; 8:45 am] determined that these records are Comment Request presently retrieved by company and BILLING CODE 3510–22–P sales representative name, rather than The Department of Commerce will the personal identifier of the service submit to the Office of Management and member. Budget (OMB) for clearance the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE The Office of the Secretary systems of following proposal for collection of records notices subject to the Privacy information under the provisions of the Office of the Secretary Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. [Docket ID: DOD–2017–OS–0016] have been published in the Federal Chapter 35). Register and are available from the Agency: National Oceanic and Privacy Act of 1974; System of address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Records CONTACT or at the Defense Privacy, Civil Title: Large Pelagic Fishing Survey. OMB Control Number: 0648–0380. AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Liberties and Transparency Division Form Number(s): None. Defense, DoD. Web site at http://defense.gov/privacy. Type of Request: Regular (extension of ACTION: Rescindment of a System of The proposed rescindment is not a currently approved information Records notice. within the purview of subsection (r) of collection). the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), Number of Respondents: 15,024. SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of as amended, which requires the Defense is rescinding a system of submission of a new or altered system sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Average Hours per Response: 11 minutes for a telephone interview; 5 records, DPR 31, Personal Commercial report. minutes for a dockside interview; 11⁄2 Solicitation Evaluation. These files SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER: minutes to respond to a follow-up document service member experiences Personal Commercial Solicitation validation call for dockside interviews; with sales representatives soliciting on Evaluation, DPR 31. 1 minute for a biological sampling of DoD installations. catch. DATES: Comments will be accepted on or HISTORY: Burden Hours: 3,608. before May 18, 2017. This proposed July 19, 2006, 71 FR 41000. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Apr 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1


Document Created: 2017-04-18 00:00:02
Document Modified: 2017-04-18 00:00:02
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective April 18, 2017.
ContactChien-Min Yang or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5484 or (202) 482-1396.
FR Citation82 FR 18285 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR