82 FR 18395 - Safety Zone; Unexploded Ordnance Detonation; Naval Base Kitsap, Elwood Point; Bremerton, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 74 (April 19, 2017)

Page Range		18395-18397
FR Document		2017-07883

The Coast Guard is establishing a 500-yard temporary safety zone on in vicinity of Naval Base Kitsap, Elwood Point; Bremerton, WA. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by the unexploded ordnance detonation being conducted by the U.S. Navy. The safety zone will prohibit any person or vessel from entering or remaining in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a Designated Representative.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 74 (Wednesday, April 19, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 19, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18395-18397]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0313]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Unexploded Ordnance Detonation; Naval Base Kitsap, 
Elwood Point; Bremerton, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a 500-yard temporary safety 
zone on in vicinity of Naval Base Kitsap, Elwood Point; Bremerton, WA. 
The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine 
environment from potential hazards created by the unexploded ordnance 
detonation being conducted by the U.S. Navy. The safety zone will 
prohibit any person or vessel from entering or remaining in the safety 
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a Designated 
Representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. on April 19, 2017 to 8 p.m. 
on April 20, 2017. It will only be enforced during two periods: from 8 
a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 19, 2017, and from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 
20, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0313 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email CWO Jeffrey Zappen, Waterways Management Division, U.S. 
Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, email 
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM would be 
impracticable as delayed promulgation may result in injury or damage to 
the maritime public as a result of the detonation of ordnance. The 
Captain of the Port, Sector Puget Sound received notice of the date of 
the planned detonation on April 12, 2017.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard also finds that good 
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of 
this rule would be impracticable because the danger associated with 
detonating ordnance will occur on April 19, 2017, and this rule must be 
effective to protect against those hazards on that date.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port, Puget Sound has determined that 
potential hazards associated with the detonation will be a safety 
concern for anyone transiting through the location of the operation. 
This rule is needed to ensure the safety of the maritime public from 
hazards associated with the unexploded ordnance detonation in the 
vicinity of Naval Base Kitsap, Elwood Point, Bremerton, WA.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone from 8 a.m. on April 
19, 2017 to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017. It will only be enforced during 
two periods: From 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 19, 2017, and from 8 a.m. 
to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017. The safety zone will cover all navigable 
waters within 500 yards of 47[deg]35'30.8'' N. 122[deg]41'11.1'' W., 
which is located at Point Elwood on Naval Base Kitsap, located in 
Ostrich Bay, southern end of Dyes Inlet. The duration of the zone is 
intended to protect personnel,

[[Page 18396]]

vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by 
the unexploded ordnance detonation being conducted by the U.S. Navy. 
The Captain of the Port may use Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant 
general permission to enter the zone within the effective period of 
this rule once the detonation is complete and the zone is no longer 
needed.
    No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone 
without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated 
representative. Vessels wishing to enter the safety zone must request 
permission to do so from the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound by 
contacting the Joint Harbor Operations Center at 206-217-6001 or the 
on-scene patrol craft, if any, via VHF-FM Channel 16. If permission for 
entry is granted, vessels must proceed at a minimum speed for safe 
navigation.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the limited nature 
of the size and duration of the temporary safety zone. Moreover, the 
Coast Guard will issue a Special Marine Information Broadcast via VHF-
FM Channel 16 about the safety zone and the rule allows vessels to seek 
permission to enter the safety zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V 
above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator, because the zone established in this rule is 
limited in nature of size and duration.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175, 
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because 
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian 
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian 
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has 
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person 
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a temporary safety zone that is limited in duration that 
will prohibit entry within 500 yards of the designated area. It is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. We seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping

[[Page 18397]]

requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-0313 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T13-0313  Safety Zone; Unexploded Ordnance Detonation; Naval 
Base Kitsap; Elwood Point; Bremerton, WA.

    (a) Location. The following area is designated as a safety zone: 
all waters within 500-yard radius of the unexploded ordnance 
detonation, Naval Base Kitsap, Elwood Point (47[deg]35'30.8'' N, 
122[deg]41'11.1'' W); Bremerton, WA.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 
subpart C of this part no person or vessel may enter or remain in the 
safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound 
or a designated representative. To request permission to enter the 
safety zone, contact the Joint Harbor Operations Center at 206-217-
6001, or the on-scene patrol craft, if any, via VHF-FM Channel 16. If 
permission for entry into the safety zone is granted, vessels or 
persons must proceed at the minimum speed for safe navigation and in 
compliance with any other directions given by the Captain of the Port, 
Puget Sound or a designated representative.
    (c) Effective period. This section is effective from 8 a.m. on 
April 19, 2017 to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017. It will only be enforced 
during two periods: From 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 19, 2017, and from 8 
a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017.

    Dated: April 13, 2017.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017-07883 Filed 4-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

18396 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

vessels, and the marine environment with populations of less than 50,000. Indian Tribal Governments, because it
from potential hazards created by the The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. does not have a substantial direct effect
unexploded ordnance detonation being 605(b) that this rule will not have a on one or more Indian tribes, on the
conducted by the U.S. Navy. The significant economic impact on a relationship between the Federal
Captain of the Port may use Broadcast substantial number of small entities. Government and Indian tribes, or on the
Notice to Mariners to grant general While some owners or operators of distribution of power and
permission to enter the zone within the vessels intending to transit the safety responsibilities between the Federal
effective period of this rule once the zone may be small entities, for the Government and Indian tribes. If you
detonation is complete and the zone is reasons stated in section V above, this believe this rule has implications for
no longer needed. rule will not have a significant federalism or Indian tribes, please
No vessel or person will be permitted economic impact on any vessel owner contact the person listed in the FOR
to enter the safety zone without or operator, because the zone FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
obtaining permission from the COTP or established in this rule is limited in above.
a designated representative. Vessels nature of size and duration.
wishing to enter the safety zone must Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
request permission to do so from the Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound by Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
contacting the Joint Harbor Operations we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Center at 206–217–6001 or the on-scene understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
patrol craft, if any, via VHF–FM would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
Channel 16. If permission for entry is organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
granted, vessels must proceed at a jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
minimum speed for safe navigation. concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
V. Regulatory Analyses listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
We developed this rule after CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
considering numerous statutes and Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
executive orders (E.O.s) related to on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
rulemaking. Below we summarize our who enforce, or otherwise determine
analyses based on a number of these compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
Amendment rights of protestors. Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies Ombudsman evaluates these actions
to assess the costs and benefits of which guide the Coast Guard in
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National
available regulatory alternatives and, if responsiveness to small business. If you
regulation is necessary, to select Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
regulatory approaches that maximize employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the determined that this action is one of a
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not
importance of quantifying both costs Coast Guard will not retaliate against
and benefits, of reducing costs, of individually or cumulatively have a
small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
harmonizing rules, and of promoting about this rule or any policy or action
flexibility. This rule has not been environment. This rule involves a
of the Coast Guard. temporary safety zone that is limited in
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, C. Collection of Information duration that will prohibit entry within
it has not been reviewed by the Office This rule will not call for a new 500 yards of the designated area. It is
of Management and Budget. collection of information under the categorically excluded from further
This regulatory action determination Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
is based on the limited nature of the size U.S.C. 3501–3520). 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. We
and duration of the temporary safety seek any comments or information that
zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard will D. Federalism and Indian Tribal may lead to the discovery of a
issue a Special Marine Information Governments significant environmental impact from
Broadcast via VHF–FM Channel 16 A rule has implications for federalism this rule.
about the safety zone and the rule under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has G. Protest Activities
allows vessels to seek permission to a substantial direct effect on the States,
enter the safety zone. on the relationship between the national The Coast Guard respects the First
government and the States, or on the Amendment rights of protesters.
B. Impact on Small Entities distribution of power and Protesters are asked to contact the
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of responsibilities among the various person listed in the FOR FURTHER
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, levels of government. We have analyzed INFORMATION CONTACT section to
requires Federal agencies to consider this rule under that Order and have coordinate protest activities so that your
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES

the potential impact of regulations on determined that it is consistent with the message can be received without
small entities during rulemaking. The fundamental federalism principles and jeopardizing the safety or security of
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small preemption requirements described in people, places or vessels.
businesses, not-for-profit organizations E.O. 13132. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
that are independently owned and Also, this rule does not have tribal
operated and are not dominant in their implications under E.O. 13175, Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Consultation and Coordination with (water), Reporting and recordkeeping

VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:38 Apr 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM 19APR1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 18397

requirements, Security measures, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I. Executive Order 13609 and International
Waterways. Trade Analysis
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials J. Privacy Act
For the reasons discussed in the Safety Administration K. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 List of Subjects
CFR part 165 as follows: 49 CFR Parts 107 and 171 I. Civil Penalty Amendments
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION [Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0041 (HM–258D)] Section 701 of the Federal Civil
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS RIN 2137–AF23 Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Hazardous Materials: Revision of Act), Public Law 114–74, which
continues to read as follows: Maximum and Minimum Civil Penalties amended the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (the
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Inflation Adjustment Act), Public Law
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Materials Safety Administration 101–410, required that the Agency make
Department of Homeland Security Delegation (PHMSA), DOT.
No. 0170.1.
an initial catch-up adjustment with
ACTION: Final rule. subsequent annual adjustments to the
■ 2. Add § 165.T13–0313 to read as maximum and minimum civil penalties
SUMMARY: PHMSA is revising the
follows: set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5123(a) for a
maximum and minimum civil penalties
knowing violation of the Federal
§ 165.T13–0313 Safety Zone; Unexploded for a knowing violation of the Federal
hazardous material transportation law
Ordnance Detonation; Naval Base Kitsap; hazardous material transportation law
or a regulation, order, special permit, or
Elwood Point; Bremerton, WA. or a regulation, order, special permit, or
approval issued under that law. These
approval issued under that law. The
(a) Location. The following area is changes to the maximum and minimum
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
designated as a safety zone: all waters civil penalty amounts apply to
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
within 500-yard radius of the violations assessed on or after the
2015, which amended the Federal Civil
unexploded ordnance detonation, Naval effective date of August 1, 2016. The
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
Base Kitsap, Elwood Point (47°35′30.8″ 2015 Act also requires that the Agency
1990, required Agencies to update their
N, 122°41′11.1″ W); Bremerton, WA. make subsequent annual adjustments
civil monetary penalties in August 2016
for inflation beginning in 2017, which
(b) Regulations. In accordance with through an interim final rulemaking.
are to be published no later than January
the general regulations in subpart C of PHMSA has elected to do the 2017
15th of each subsequent year.
this part no person or vessel may enter update in a final rulemaking. Per this
final rule, the maximum civil penalty The Office of Management and
or remain in the safety zone unless
for a knowing violation is now $78,376, Budget’s (OMB) ‘‘Memorandum for the
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Heads of Executive Departments and
Puget Sound or a designated except for violations that result in death,
serious illness, or severe injury to any Agencies, Implementation of the Federal
representative. To request permission to Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
enter the safety zone, contact the Joint person or substantial destruction of
property, for which the maximum civil Improvements Act of 2015,’’ M–17–11,
Harbor Operations Center at 206–217– provides guidance on how to update
penalty is $182,877. In addition, the
6001, or the on-scene patrol craft, if any, agencies’ civil penalties pursuant to the
minimum civil penalty amount for a
via VHF–FM Channel 16. If permission violation relating to training is now 2015 Act. In order to complete the 2017
for entry into the safety zone is granted, $471. annual adjustment, agencies should
vessels or persons must proceed at the multiply each applicable penalty by the
minimum speed for safe navigation and DATES: Effective Date: April 19, 2017. multiplier (1.01636) and round to the
in compliance with any other directions FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: nearest dollar. The multiplier should be
given by the Captain of the Port, Puget Shawn Wolsey, Office of Chief Counsel, applied to the most recent penalty
Sound or a designated representative. (202) 366–4400, Pipeline and Hazardous amount, i.e., the one that includes the
Materials Safety Administration, U.S. catch-up adjustment that the 2015 Act
(c) Effective period. This section is Department of Transportation, 1200
effective from 8 a.m. on April 19, 2017 required agencies to issue no later than
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, July 1, 2016.
to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017. It will only DC 20590–0001.
be enforced during two periods: From 8 Accordingly, PHMSA is revising the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: references to the maximum and
a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 19, 2017, and
from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017. Table of Contents: minimum civil penalty amounts in 49
CFR 107.329, appendix A to subpart D
Dated: April 13, 2017. I. Civil Penalty Amendments of 49 CFR part 107, and 49 CFR 171.1
L.A. Sturgis, II. Justification for Final Rule to reflect the changes required by the
III. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
2015 Act:
Port Puget Sound. Rulemaking • Revising the maximum civil penalty
[FR Doc. 2017–07883 Filed 4–18–17; 8:45 am] B. Executive Order 12866, Executive Order from $77,114 to $78,376 for a person who
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 13563, and DOT Regulatory Policies and knowingly violates the Federal hazardous
Procedures material transportation law or a regulation,
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES

C. Executive Order 13132 order, special permit, or approval issued
D. Executive Order 13175 under that law.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive • Revising the maximum civil penalty
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and from $179,933 to $182,877 for a person who
Policies knowingly violates the Federal hazardous
F. Paperwork Reduction Act material transportation law or a regulation,
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 order, special permit, or approval issued
H. Environmental Assessment under that law that results in death, serious

VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:38 Apr 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM 19APR1

Document Created: 2018-11-14 09:44:19
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 09:44:19

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 8 a.m. on April 19, 2017 to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017. It will only be enforced during two periods: from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 19, 2017, and from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on April 20, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email CWO Jeffrey Zappen, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 18395
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 18395 - Safety Zone; Unexploded Ordnance Detonation; Naval Base Kitsap, Elwood Point; Bremerton, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 74 (April 19, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard