82_FR_20342 82 FR 20260 - Air Plan Approval; TN: Non-Interference Demonstration for Federal Low-Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement in Middle Tennessee

82 FR 20260 - Air Plan Approval; TN: Non-Interference Demonstration for Federal Low-Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement in Middle Tennessee

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 82 (May 1, 2017)

Page Range20260-20262
FR Document2017-08646

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the State of Tennessee's November 21, 2016, revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), in support of the State's request that EPA change the federal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) requirements for Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties (hereinafter referred to as the ``Middle Tennessee Area'' or ``Area''). Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP submittal revises its maintenance plan for the Middle Tennessee Area for the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and demonstrates that relaxing the federal RVP requirements in this Area would not interfere with the Area's ability to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). Specifically, Tennessee's SIP revision concludes that relaxing the federal RVP requirement from 7.8 pounds per square inch (psi) to 9.0 psi for gasoline sold between June 1 and September 15 of each year in the Area would not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS or with any other CAA requirement. EPA has determined that Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP revision is consistent with the applicable provisions of the CAA.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20260-20262]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0615; FRL-9961-48-Region 4]


Air Plan Approval; TN: Non-Interference Demonstration for Federal 
Low-Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement in Middle Tennessee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the 
State of Tennessee's November 21, 2016, revision to its State 
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted through the Tennessee Department 
of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), in support of the State's 
request that EPA change the federal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) 
requirements for Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson 
Counties (hereinafter referred to as the ``Middle Tennessee Area'' or 
``Area''). Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP submittal revises its 
maintenance plan for the Middle Tennessee Area for the 1997 8-hour 
ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and demonstrates 
that relaxing the federal RVP requirements in this Area would not 
interfere with the Area's ability to meet the requirements of the Clean 
Air Act (CAA or Act). Specifically, Tennessee's SIP revision concludes 
that relaxing the federal RVP requirement from 7.8 pounds per square 
inch (psi) to 9.0 psi for gasoline sold between June 1 and September 15 
of each year in the Area would not interfere with attainment or 
maintenance of the NAAQS or with any other CAA requirement. EPA has 
determined that Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP revision is 
consistent with the applicable provisions of the CAA.

DATES: This rule is effective May 1, 2017.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket 
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0615. All documents in the docket 
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the 
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., 
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure 
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard 
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and 
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official 
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 
excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory 
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, 
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 
30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or 
via electronic mail at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What is the background for this final action?

    On November 21, 2016, Tennessee submitted a SIP revision consisting 
of a revision to its 110(a)(1) maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS for the Middle Tennessee Area and the technical 
noninterference demonstration supporting the State's request to change 
the federal RVP requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in the Area. In a 
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) published on February 24, 2017 (82 
FR 11517), EPA proposed to approve the State's noninterference 
demonstration and the updates to updated emissions inventory and 
projections associated with the mobile source modeling used in the 
State's noninterference demonstration related to RVP. The details of 
Tennessee's submittal and the rationale for EPA's actions are explained 
in the NPR. EPA did not receive any adverse comments on the proposed 
action.

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP revision 
consisting of a revision to its 110(a)(1) maintenance plan for the 1997 
8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Middle Tennessee Area and the technical 
noninterference demonstration supporting the State's request to change 
the federal RVP requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in the Area. 
Specifically, EPA is finalizing updated emissions inventory and 
projections associated with the mobile source modeling used in the 
State's noninterference demonstration related to RVP. EPA has 
determined that the change in the RVP requirements for Davidson, 
Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties will

[[Page 20261]]

not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any NAAQS or with any 
other applicable requirement of the CAA.
    EPA has determined that Tennessee's November 21, 2016, RVP-related 
SIP revision is consistent with the applicable provisions of the CAA 
for the reasons provided in the NPR. Through this action, EPA is not 
removing the federal 7.8 psi RVP requirement for Davidson, Rutherford, 
Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties. Any such action would occur in 
a separate rulemaking.
    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds that there is good 
cause for this action to become effective immediately upon publication. 
This is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary because today's 
action approves a noninterference demonstration that will serve as the 
basis of a subsequent action to relieve the Area from certain CAA 
requirements that would otherwise apply to it. The immediate effective 
date for this action is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which 
provides that rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days 
after publication if the rule grants or recognizes an exemption or 
relieves a restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which allows an 
effective date less than 30 days after publication as otherwise 
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the 
rule. The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in section 
553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their 
behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. This rule, 
however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that 
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes 
effect. Rather, this rule will serve as a basis for a subsequent action 
to relieve the Area from certain CAA requirements. For these reasons, 
EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this action to become 
effective on the date of publication of this action.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submittal that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, October 7, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) nor will it 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by June 30, 2017. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements and 
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 31, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart RR--Tennessee

0
2. Section 52.2220(e) is amended by adding a new entry for ``1997 8-
hour ozone maintenance plan update for the Middle Tennessee Area and 
RVP standard'' at the end of the table to read as follows:


Sec.  52.2220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

[[Page 20262]]



                                EPA-Approved Tennessee Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Applicable
  Name of non-regulatory  SIP     geographic  or        State        EPA approval
           provision              nonattainment    effective date        date                Explanation
                                       area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
1997 8-hour ozone maintenance   Davidson,              11/21/2016  5/1/2017,         ...........................
 plan update for the Middle      Rutherford,                        [Insert Federal
 Tennessee Area and RVP          Sumner,                            Register
 standard.                       Williamson, and                    citation].
                                 Wilson Counties.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-08646 Filed 4-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                20260                       Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                                                                                               EPA-APPROVED MAINE REGULATIONS
                                                                                                                                         EPA approval date
                                                                                                                    State effective
                                                           State citation                   Title/subject                               EPA approval date and                                  Explanations
                                                                                                                         date                 citation 1


                                                         *                            *                   *                              *                   *                          *                     *
                                                Chapter 137 .................      Emission Statements ..              11/08/2008     05/01/2017 [Insert Federal         The entire chapter is approved with the excep-
                                                                                                                                        Register citation].                tion of HAP and greenhouse gas reporting
                                                                                                                                                                           requirements which were withdrawn from
                                                                                                                                                                           the State’s SIP revision: Sections 1(C), (E),
                                                                                                                                                                           and (F); Definitions 2(A) through (F) and (I);
                                                                                                                                                                           Sections 3(B) and (C); the last sentence of
                                                                                                                                                                           Section 4(D)(5); and Appendix A and B.

                                                               *                        *                       *                           *                       *                      *                  *
                                                    1 In
                                                     order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this col-
                                                umn for the particular provision.


                                                *          *       *        *     *                           attainment or maintenance of the                           562–9089 or via electronic mail at
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–08648 Filed 4–28–17; 8:45 am]                   NAAQS or with any other CAA                                akers.brad@epa.gov.
                                                BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                        requirement. EPA has determined that                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                              Tennessee’s November 21, 2016, SIP
                                                                                                              revision is consistent with the                            I. What is the background for this final
                                                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                      applicable provisions of the CAA.                          action?
                                                AGENCY                                                        DATES: This rule is effective May 1,                          On November 21, 2016, Tennessee
                                                                                                              2017.                                                      submitted a SIP revision consisting of a
                                                40 CFR Part 52                                                                                                           revision to its 110(a)(1) maintenance
                                                [EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0615; FRL–9961–48–                          ADDRESSES:    EPA has established a                        plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
                                                Region 4]                                                     docket for this action under Docket                        for the Middle Tennessee Area and the
                                                                                                              Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–                            technical noninterference
                                                Air Plan Approval; TN: Non-                                   2016–0615. All documents in the docket                     demonstration supporting the State’s
                                                Interference Demonstration for Federal                        are listed on the www.regulations.gov                      request to change the federal RVP
                                                Low-Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement                           Web site. Although listed in the index,                    requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in
                                                in Middle Tennessee                                           some information may not be publicly                       the Area. In a notice of proposed
                                                                                                              available, i.e., Confidential Business                     rulemaking (NPR) published on
                                                AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                                                                                              Information or other information whose                     February 24, 2017 (82 FR 11517), EPA
                                                Agency (EPA).
                                                                                                              disclosure is restricted by statute.                       proposed to approve the State’s
                                                ACTION: Final rule.
                                                                                                              Certain other material, such as                            noninterference demonstration and the
                                                SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection                       copyrighted material, is not placed on                     updates to updated emissions inventory
                                                Agency (EPA) is approving the State of                        the Internet and will be publicly                          and projections associated with the
                                                Tennessee’s November 21, 2016,                                available only in hard copy form.                          mobile source modeling used in the
                                                revision to its State Implementation                          Publicly available docket materials are                    State’s noninterference demonstration
                                                Plan (SIP), submitted through the                             available either electronically through                    related to RVP. The details of
                                                Tennessee Department of Environment                           www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at                     Tennessee’s submittal and the rationale
                                                and Conservation (TDEC), in support of                        the Air Regulatory Management Section,                     for EPA’s actions are explained in the
                                                the State’s request that EPA change the                       Air Planning and Implementation                            NPR. EPA did not receive any adverse
                                                federal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP)                             Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics                         comments on the proposed action.
                                                requirements for Davidson, Rutherford,                        Management Division, U.S.
                                                Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson                                Environmental Protection Agency,                           II. Final Action
                                                Counties (hereinafter referred to as the                      Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,                             EPA is approving Tennessee’s
                                                ‘‘Middle Tennessee Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’).                       Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA                           November 21, 2016, SIP revision
                                                Tennessee’s November 21, 2016, SIP                            requests that if at all possible, you                      consisting of a revision to its 110(a)(1)
                                                submittal revises its maintenance plan                        contact the person listed in the FOR                       maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour
                                                for the Middle Tennessee Area for the                         FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to                     ozone NAAQS for the Middle Tennessee
                                                1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air                        schedule your inspection. The Regional                     Area and the technical noninterference
                                                quality standard (NAAQS) and                                  Office’s official hours of business are                    demonstration supporting the State’s
                                                demonstrates that relaxing the federal                        Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to                        request to change the federal RVP
                                                RVP requirements in this Area would                           4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.                     requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in
                                                not interfere with the Area’s ability to                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.                        the Area. Specifically, EPA is finalizing
                                                meet the requirements of the Clean Air                        Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management                      updated emissions inventory and
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                                Act (CAA or Act). Specifically,                               Section, Air Planning and                                  projections associated with the mobile
                                                Tennessee’s SIP revision concludes that                       Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides                     source modeling used in the State’s
                                                relaxing the federal RVP requirement                          and Toxics Management Division, U.S.                       noninterference demonstration related
                                                from 7.8 pounds per square inch (psi) to                      Environmental Protection Agency,                           to RVP. EPA has determined that the
                                                9.0 psi for gasoline sold between June 1                      Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,                           change in the RVP requirements for
                                                and September 15 of each year in the                          Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers                     Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner,
                                                Area would not interfere with                                 can be reached via telephone at (404)                      Williamson, and Wilson Counties will


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014         16:41 Apr 28, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000    Frm 00020   Fmt 4700       Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM   01MYR1


                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                                20261

                                                not interfere with attainment or                        merely approves state law as meeting                  submit a rule report, which includes a
                                                maintenance of any NAAQS or with any                    federal requirements and does not                     copy of the rule, to each House of the
                                                other applicable requirement of the                     impose additional requirements beyond                 Congress and to the Comptroller General
                                                CAA.                                                    those imposed by state law. For that                  of the United States. EPA will submit a
                                                   EPA has determined that Tennessee’s                  reason, this action:                                  report containing this action and other
                                                November 21, 2016, RVP-related SIP                         • Is not a significant regulatory action           required information to the U.S. Senate,
                                                revision is consistent with the                         subject to review by the Office of                    the U.S. House of Representatives, and
                                                applicable provisions of the CAA for the                Management and Budget under                           the Comptroller General of the United
                                                reasons provided in the NPR. Through                    Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,                  States prior to publication of the rule in
                                                this action, EPA is not removing the                    October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,               the Federal Register. A major rule
                                                federal 7.8 psi RVP requirement for                     January 21, 2011);                                    cannot take effect until 60 days after it
                                                Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner,                              • does not impose an information                   is published in the Federal Register.
                                                Williamson, and Wilson Counties. Any                    collection burden under the provisions                This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
                                                such action would occur in a separate                   of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44                    defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
                                                rulemaking.                                             U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);                                    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
                                                   In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d),                     • is certified as not having a                     petitions for judicial review of this
                                                EPA finds that there is good cause for                  significant economic impact on a                      action must be filed in the United States
                                                this action to become effective                         substantial number of small entities                  Court of Appeals for the appropriate
                                                immediately upon publication. This is                   under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5               circuit by June 30, 2017. Filing a
                                                because a delayed effective date is                     U.S.C. 601 et seq.);                                  petition for reconsideration by the
                                                unnecessary because today’s action                         • does not contain any unfunded
                                                approves a noninterference                                                                                    Administrator of this final rule does not
                                                                                                        mandate or significantly or uniquely
                                                demonstration that will serve as the                                                                          affect the finality of this action for the
                                                                                                        affect small governments, as described
                                                basis of a subsequent action to relieve                                                                       purposes of judicial review nor does it
                                                                                                        in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                                                the Area from certain CAA requirements                                                                        extend the time within which a petition
                                                                                                        of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
                                                that would otherwise apply to it. The                      • does not have Federalism                         for judicial review may be filed, and
                                                immediate effective date for this action                implications as specified in Executive                shall not postpone the effectiveness of
                                                is authorized under both 5 U.S.C.                       Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, October 7,                  such rule or action. This action may not
                                                553(d)(1), which provides that                          1999);                                                be challenged later in proceedings to
                                                rulemaking actions may become                              • is not an economically significant               enforce its requirements. See section
                                                effective less than 30 days after                       regulatory action based on health or                  307(b)(2).
                                                publication if the rule grants or                       safety risks subject to Executive Order               List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                                recognizes an exemption or relieves a                   13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                                                restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which                  • is not a significant regulatory action             Environmental protection, Air
                                                allows an effective date less than 30                   subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR               pollution control, Incorporation by
                                                days after publication as otherwise                     28355, May 22, 2001);                                 reference, Intergovernmental relations,
                                                provided by the agency for good cause                      • is not subject to requirements of                Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
                                                found and published with the rule. The                  Section 12(d) of the National                         matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
                                                purpose of the 30-day waiting period                    Technology Transfer and Advancement                   requirements and Volatile organic
                                                prescribed in section 553(d) is to give                 Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because              compounds.
                                                affected parties a reasonable time to                   application of those requirements would                 Dated: March 31, 2017.
                                                adjust their behavior and prepare before                be inconsistent with the CAA; and                     V. Anne Heard,
                                                the final rule takes effect. This rule,                    • does not provide EPA with the                    Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
                                                however, does not create any new                        discretionary authority to address, as
                                                regulatory requirements such that                       appropriate, disproportionate human                       40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
                                                affected parties would need time to                     health or environmental effects, using
                                                prepare before the rule takes effect.                   practicable and legally permissible                   PART 52—APPROVAL AND
                                                Rather, this rule will serve as a basis for             methods, under Executive Order 12898                  PROMULGATION OF
                                                a subsequent action to relieve the Area                 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).                      IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
                                                from certain CAA requirements. For                         In addition, the SIP is not approved
                                                these reasons, EPA finds good cause                     to apply on any Indian reservation land               ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
                                                under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this action                or in any other area where EPA or an                  continues to read as follows:
                                                to become effective on the date of                      Indian tribe has demonstrated that a                      Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
                                                publication of this action.                             tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
                                                                                                        Indian country, the rule does not have                Subpart RR—Tennessee
                                                III. Statutory and Executive Order                      tribal implications as specified by
                                                Reviews                                                 Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,                   ■ 2. Section 52.2220(e) is amended by
                                                   Under the CAA, the Administrator is                  November 9, 2000) nor will it impose                  adding a new entry for ‘‘1997 8-hour
                                                required to approve a SIP submittal that                substantial direct costs on tribal                    ozone maintenance plan update for the
                                                complies with the provisions of the Act                 governments or preempt tribal law.                    Middle Tennessee Area and RVP
                                                and applicable federal regulations. See                    The Congressional Review Act, 5                    standard’’ at the end of the table to read
                                                42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).                     U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small             as follows:
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                                Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,                     Business Regulatory Enforcement
                                                                                                        Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides              § 52.2220    Identification of plan.
                                                EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
                                                provided that they meet the criteria of                 that before a rule may take effect, the               *       *    *      *     *
                                                the CAA. Accordingly, this action                       agency promulgating the rule must                         (e) * * *




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:41 Apr 28, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00021   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM   01MYR1


                                                20262                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                                                                          EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
                                                     Name of non-regulatory                    Applicable geographic            State effective                EPA approval date             Explanation
                                                        SIP provision                          or nonattainment area                 date


                                                         *                   *                         *                             *                       *                   *                  *
                                                1997 8-hour ozone maintenance           Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner,                    11/21/2016     5/1/2017, [Insert Federal Reg-
                                                  plan update for the Middle              Williamson, and Wilson Coun-                                    ister citation].
                                                  Tennessee Area and RVP                  ties.
                                                  standard.



                                                [FR Doc. 2017–08646 Filed 4–28–17; 8:45 am]             restricted by statute. Multimedia                         VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
                                                BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                  submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be                  I. Background and Purpose
                                                                                                        accompanied by a written comment.
                                                                                                        The written comment is considered the                        The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires
                                                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                official comment and should include                       states in the Ozone Transport Region
                                                AGENCY                                                  discussion of all points you wish to                      (OTR), as well as moderate and above
                                                                                                        make. The EPA will generally not                          ozone nonattainment areas, to
                                                40 CFR Part 52                                          consider comments or comment                              implement RACT for major sources of
                                                                                                        contents located outside of the primary                   volatile organic compounds.
                                                [EPA–R01–OAR–2016–0648; A–1–FRL–
                                                9958–37–Region 1]                                       submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or                    Connecticut is in the OTR and the state
                                                                                                        other file sharing system). For                           is currently designated nonattainment
                                                Air Plan Approval; CT; Approval of                      additional submission methods, please                     and classified as moderate for the 2008
                                                Single Source Orders                                    contact the person identified in the FOR                  ozone standard. See 40 CFR 81.307.
                                                                                                        FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.                         The Connecticut Department of
                                                AGENCY: Environmental Protection                        For the full EPA public comment policy,                   Energy and Environmental Protection
                                                Agency (EPA).                                           information about CBI or multimedia                       (CT DEEP) submitted to EPA two single
                                                ACTION: Direct final rule.                              submissions, and general guidance on                      source orders establishing RACT for
                                                                                                        making effective comments, please visit                   sources of VOCs for incorporation into
                                                SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection                                                                           the Connecticut State Implementation
                                                                                                        http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
                                                Agency (EPA) is approving State                                                                                   Plan (SIP), and also submitted requests
                                                                                                        commenting-epa-dockets.
                                                Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions                                                                               to withdraw from the SIP seven
                                                                                                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
                                                submitted by the State of Connecticut.                                                                            previously-approved orders. The two
                                                The revisions establish reasonably                      McConnell, Environmental Engineer,
                                                                                                        Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs                   orders submitted for approval are
                                                available control technology (RACT) for                                                                           Consent Order 8001, issued to Mallace
                                                two facilities that emit volatile organic               Branch (Mail Code OEP05–02), U.S.
                                                                                                        Environmental Protection Agency,                          Industries, located in Clinton,
                                                compounds (VOCs) in the state.                                                                                    Connecticut, submitted to EPA on
                                                Additionally, we are also approving                     Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite
                                                                                                        100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109–                        January 13, 2006, and Consent Order
                                                Connecticut’s request to withdraw seven                                                                           8029, issued to Hamilton Sundstrand,
                                                previously-approved single source                       3912; (617) 918–1046;
                                                                                                        mcconnell.robert@epa.gov.                                 located in Windsor Locks, Connecticut,
                                                orders from the SIP. This action is being                                                                         submitted to EPA on November 15,
                                                taken in accordance with the Clean Air                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                                                                                  2011. The seven withdrawal requests
                                                Act.                                                    Throughout this document whenever                         are for the following previously-
                                                                                                        ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean               approved Consent Orders: Order 8021
                                                DATES: This direct final rule will be
                                                                                                        EPA.                                                      issued to Pfizer Global Manufacturing;
                                                effective June 30, 2017, unless EPA                        Organization of this document. The
                                                receives adverse comments by May 31,                                                                              Order 8032 issued to Heminway and
                                                                                                        following outline is provided to aid in
                                                2017. If adverse comments are received,                                                                           Bartlett Company (which was
                                                                                                        locating information in this preamble.
                                                EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of                                                                           subsequently renamed Coats North
                                                the direct final rule in the Federal                    I. Background and Purpose                                 America); Order 8009 issued to Uniroyal
                                                Register informing the public that the                  II. Description and Evaluation of VOC RACT                Chemical Company; Order 8200 issued
                                                                                                              Order Submittals
                                                rule will not take effect.                                 1. Order for Mallace Industries
                                                                                                                                                                  to Watson Laboratories; Order 8014
                                                ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,                           2. Order for Hamilton Sundstrand                       issued to Pratt & Whitney Aircraft;
                                                identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–                    III. Description and Evaluation of VOC RACT               Order 8011 issued to the Dow Chemical
                                                OAR–2016–0648 at http://                                      Order Withdrawal Requests                           Company; and Order 8010 issued to
                                                www.regulations.gov, or via email Anne                     1. Withdrawal Request for Pfizer Global                Sikorsky Aircraft.
                                                                                                              Manufacturing                                          A description of these submittals and
                                                Arnold at: arnold.anne@epa.gov. For                        2. Withdrawal Request for Coats North
                                                comments submitted at Regulations.gov,                                                                            our evaluation of them appears below in
                                                                                                              America                                             Section II of this document.
                                                follow the online instructions for                         3. Withdrawal Request for Uniroyal
                                                submitting comments. Once submitted,                          Chemical Company                                    II. Description and Evaluation of VOC
                                                comments cannot be edited or removed                       4. Withdrawal Request for Watson                       RACT Order Submittals
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                                from Regulations.gov. For either manner                       Laboratories
                                                of submission, the EPA may publish any                     5. Withdrawal Request for Pratt & Whitney              1. Order for Mallace Industries
                                                comment received to its public docket.                        Aircraft                                               Consent Order 8001 was issued to
                                                                                                           6. Withdrawal Request for Dow Chemical
                                                Do not submit electronically any                           7. Withdrawal Request for Sikorsky                     Frismar, Incorporated, located in
                                                information you consider to be                                Aircraft                                            Clinton, Connecticut, on October 19,
                                                Confidential Business Information (CBI)                 IV. Final Action                                          1987, pursuant to section 22a–174–
                                                or other information whose disclosure is                V. Incorporation by Reference                             20(cc) of the Regulations of Connecticut


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:41 Apr 28, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00022   Fmt 4700       Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM   01MYR1



Document Created: 2017-04-29 03:16:04
Document Modified: 2017-04-29 03:16:04
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis rule is effective May 1, 2017.
ContactD. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or via electronic mail at [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 20260 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR