82_FR_20393 82 FR 20311 - State Inspection Programs for Passenger-Carrier Vehicles; Withdrawal

82 FR 20311 - State Inspection Programs for Passenger-Carrier Vehicles; Withdrawal

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 82 (May 1, 2017)

Page Range20311-20312
FR Document2017-08724

FMCSA withdraws its April 27, 2016, advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) concerning the establishment of requirements for States to implement annual inspection programs for commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) designed or used to transport passengers (passenger- carrying CMVs). FMCSA sought information from all interested parties that would enable the Agency to assess the risks associated with improperly maintained or inspected passenger-carrying CMVs. The ANPRM also sought public comments concerning the effectiveness of the current FMCSA annual inspection standards, and data on the potential costs and benefits of a Federal requirement for each State to implement a mandatory inspection program. FMCSA inquired about how the Agency might incentivize States to adopt such programs. After reviewing all the public comments, and in consideration of the comments provided by individuals attending the three public listening sessions held in 2015, FMCSA has determined there is not enough data and information available to support moving forward with a rulemaking action.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20311-20312]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08724]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 350

[Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0470]
RIN 2126-AB84


State Inspection Programs for Passenger-Carrier Vehicles; 
Withdrawal

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA withdraws its April 27, 2016, advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking (ANPRM) concerning the establishment of requirements for 
States to implement annual inspection programs for commercial motor 
vehicles (CMVs) designed or used to transport passengers (passenger-
carrying CMVs). FMCSA sought information from all interested parties 
that would enable the Agency to assess the risks associated with 
improperly maintained or inspected passenger-carrying CMVs. The ANPRM 
also sought public comments concerning the effectiveness of the current 
FMCSA annual inspection standards, and data on the potential costs and 
benefits of a Federal requirement for each State to implement a 
mandatory inspection program. FMCSA inquired about how the Agency might 
incentivize States to adopt such programs. After reviewing all the 
public comments, and in consideration of the comments provided by 
individuals attending the three public listening sessions held in 2015, 
FMCSA has determined there is not enough data and information available 
to support moving forward with a rulemaking action.

DATES: The ANPRM ``State Inspection Programs for Passenger-Carrier 
Vehicles,'' published on April 27, 2016 (81 FR 24769), is withdrawn as 
of May 1, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Loretta Bitner, Chief, Commercial 
Passenger Carrier Safety Division at 202-385-2428, or via email at 
[email protected], Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,

[[Page 20312]]

DC 20590-0001. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material 
to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background/Topics Addressed During the Comment Period

    In accordance with Sec.  32710 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in 
the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 815), 
FMCSA published an ANPRM in the Federal Register on April 27, 2016 (81 
FR 24769). The Agency sought information from industry and other 
stakeholders on the maintenance and inspection of passenger-carrying 
CMVs that would help FMCSA decide whether to propose a rule that 
mandates States to impose an annual inspection process.
    FMCSA requested information from commercial passenger carriers and 
other stakeholders in order to consider proposing a rule that would 
require the States to establish annual inspection programs for 
passenger-carrying CMVs. The requested information was necessary to 
assist FMCSA in quantifying the economic benefits and costs of 
potentially moving forward with establishing an inspection program and 
in assessing risks associated with improperly maintained or inspected 
passenger-carrying CMVs. The ANPRM also was intended to provide 
information on the effectiveness of existing Federal inspection 
requirements in mitigating risks and ensuring safe and proper 
operations.\1\ In the effort to gather relevant data, FMCSA posed a 
series of questions addressing the following matters:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Subsequent to publication of the ANPRM, FMCSA issued a rule 
that eliminated the option of relying on roadside inspections as 
satisfying the periodic inspection requirement. See 81 FR 47722 
(July 22, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Existing State Mandatory Vehicle Inspection Programs for 
Passenger-Carrying CMVs.
     Measuring Effectiveness of Inspection Programs.
     Inspection Facilities and Locations.
     Costs.
     Uniformity of Mandatory Vehicle Inspections Programs.
     Current Federal Standards.
     Federal Authority.

Discussion of Comments

    The Agency received 22 public comments, with 10 commenters 
expressing general opposition to the mandatory State inspection 
requirement discussed in the ANPRM. Seven commenters supported the 
establishment of such a requirement; four commenters neither supported 
nor opposed a possible requirement, and one commenter's issue was out-
of-scope. Many commenters indicated that the existing standards for 
annual inspections prescribed in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Regulations (FMCSRs) or their own programs were sufficient. Commenters 
also indicated that current standards are effective at mitigating risk 
when properly enforced. Several commenters made their support 
contingent on factors such as uniformity in inspection standards, 
standardization of inspector training, a self-inspection option, and 
required reciprocity, whereby States would be required to recognize 
inspections conducted outside their States.
    Several commenters, including State agencies in Michigan, 
Pennsylvania, and Texas, addressed questions aimed at measuring the 
effectiveness of inspection programs. However, none of these commenters 
was able to determine whether the establishment of an inspection 
program reduced the number of safety violations detected. Michigan's 
Department of Motor Vehicles indicated it improved its inspection 
process by educating carriers on the required State inspection criteria 
in 2013; it has since observed a 10% increase in vehicles passing their 
initial safety inspection.
    Few commenters addressed how FMCSA might incentivize the States to 
establish mandatory inspection programs. The South Carolina Transport 
Police noted that a mandate would be a strain on its resources. The 
Michigan Department of Transportation noted that a program should be 
subsidized with Federal funding. A representative from Pennsylvania 
suggested providing additional Federal highway funding to those States 
with well-defined programs.

FMCSA Decision

    FMCSA withdraws the April 2016 ANPRM because the Agency is not 
aware of data or information that supports the development of a notice 
of proposed rulemaking to require the States to establish mandatory 
annual inspection programs for passenger-carrying vehicles.
    The Agency held a series public listening sessions \2\ concerning 
this subject prior to publication of the ANPRM. Those sessions provided 
interested parties with the opportunity to share their views on the 
merits of requiring State inspections of passenger CMVs. Transcripts of 
the sessions are available in the public docket noted above. 
Stakeholders' remarks and comments proved valuable in developing the 
questions posed in the ANPRM, but the information they provided was not 
sufficient to support moving beyond the ANPRM. The Agency received a 
broad range of comments identifying issues FMCSA would need to consider 
in a rulemaking, such as the costs of mandatory inspection programs, 
the value of a nation-wide uniform inspection standard, and the need 
for national training of inspectors to eliminate inconsistencies in how 
inspection standards are applied. Both industry and the enforcement 
community expressed concerns about the cost of an inspection program. 
Stakeholders' estimates of costs for program administration and 
individual inspections varied significantly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The listening sessions were conducted at the American Bus 
Association Marketplace in St. Louis, Missouri on January 13, 2015, 
a United Motor Coach Association meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana 
on January 18, 2015, and a Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance 
workshop in Jacksonville, Florida on April 14, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency does not foresee the availability of Federal funding to 
incentivize the States to adopt such programs under its existing grant 
programs.

    Issued under the authority of delegation in 49 CFR 1.87 on: 
April 25, 2017.
Daphne Y. Jefferson,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-08724 Filed 4-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P



                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                                  20311

                                                    recordkeeping. This document reopens                    commercial paint and coating removal;                   Dated: April 18, 2017.
                                                    and extends the comment periods for                     to prohibit the use of methylene                      Wendy Cleland-Hamnett,
                                                    each proposed rule for an additional 30                 chloride and NMP in these commercial                  Acting Assistant Administrator for Chemical
                                                    days. Commenters requested additional                   uses; to require manufacturers                        Safety and Pollution Prevention.
                                                    time to submit written comments for the                 (including importers), processors, and                [FR Doc. 2017–08772 Filed 4–28–17; 8:45 am]
                                                    proposed rules.                                         distributors, except for retailers, of                BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                    DATES: Comments, identified by docket                   methylene chloride and NMP for any
                                                    identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–                      use to provide downstream notification
                                                    OPPT–2016–0387 and by docket                            of these prohibitions throughout the                  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                                    identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–                      supply chain; and to require
                                                    OPPT–2016–0231 must be received on                      recordkeeping. EPA is hereby reopening                Federal Motor Carrier Safety
                                                    or before May 19, 2017.                                 the comment periods for 30 days, to                   Administration
                                                    ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed
                                                                                                            May 19, 2017.
                                                    instructions provided under ADDRESSES                      Even though EPA received requests                  49 CFR Parts 350
                                                    in the Federal Register documents of                    for a lengthier extension of the comment              [Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0470]
                                                    January 19, 2017, (82 FR 7432) (FRL–                    periods, the Agency has concluded that
                                                                                                            a 30-day reopening of the comment                     RIN 2126–AB84
                                                    9950–08) or (82 FR 7464) (FRL–9958–
                                                    57).                                                    period is sufficient. EPA has already
                                                                                                            provided for a substantial comment                    State Inspection Programs for
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        period, now totaling 90 days, for each of             Passenger-Carrier Vehicles;
                                                       For technical information contact:                   the two proposals. EPA has already                    Withdrawal
                                                    Cindy Wheeler, Chemical Control                         extended the original 60-day comment                  AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
                                                    Division (7405M), Office of Pollution                   period for the proposed rule in TCE in                Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
                                                    Prevention and Toxics, Environmental                    vapor degreasing for 30 days, from                    ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
                                                    Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania                    March 20, 2017, to April 19, 2017 (82                 rulemaking; withdrawal.
                                                    Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001;                    FR 10732, February 15, 2017). This
                                                    telephone number: 202–566–0484;                         notice provides the second extension of               SUMMARY:   FMCSA withdraws its April
                                                    email address: wheeler.cindy@epa.gov                    the comment period for that proposed                  27, 2016, advance notice of proposed
                                                    or Ana Corado, Chemical Control                         rule. EPA proposed the rule on                        rulemaking (ANPRM) concerning the
                                                    Division (7405M), Office of Pollution                   methylene chloride and NMP in paint                   establishment of requirements for States
                                                    Prevention and Toxics, Environmental                    and coating removal with a 90-day                     to implement annual inspection
                                                    Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania                    comment period, ending on April 19,                   programs for commercial motor vehicles
                                                    Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001;                    2017. Additionally, much of the                       (CMVs) designed or used to transport
                                                    telephone number: 202–564–0140;                         technical bases for the proposals has                 passengers (passenger-carrying CMVs).
                                                    email address: corado.ana@epa.gov.                      been available to the public since the                FMCSA sought information from all
                                                       For general information contact: The                 risk assessments for methylene chloride               interested parties that would enable the
                                                    TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422                        and TCE were published in 2014 and                    Agency to assess the risks associated
                                                    South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY                       the risk assessment for NMP was                       with improperly maintained or
                                                    14620; telephone number: (202) 554–                     published in 2015, and the commenters’                inspected passenger-carrying CMVs.
                                                    1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@                      expressed need for further extension                  The ANPRM also sought public
                                                    epa.gov.                                                was general in nature (e.g., the                      comments concerning the effectiveness
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:      This                    complexity and importance of the                      of the current FMCSA annual inspection
                                                    document reopens public comment                         subject matter, and prospective                       standards, and data on the potential
                                                    periods established in the two proposed                 commenters’ desire to continue                        costs and benefits of a Federal
                                                    rules issued in the Federal Register of                 conferring and reviewing the technical                requirement for each State to implement
                                                    January 19, 2017 (82 FR 7432) (FRL–                     basis for EPA’s proposal). The Agency,                a mandatory inspection program.
                                                    9950–08) and (82 FR 7464) (FRL–9958–                    therefore, is extending the comment                   FMCSA inquired about how the Agency
                                                    57). In the first action, EPA proposed a                period at its own discretion, in the                  might incentivize States to adopt such
                                                    rule under section 6 of the Toxic                       interest of receiving comprehensive                   programs. After reviewing all the public
                                                    Substances Control Act (TSCA) to                        public comment for the benefit of the                 comments, and in consideration of the
                                                    prohibit the manufacture (including                     current rules.                                        comments provided by individuals
                                                    import), processing, and distribution in                   To submit comments, or access a                    attending the three public listening
                                                    commerce of trichloroethylene (TCE) for                 docket, please follow the detailed                    sessions held in 2015, FMCSA has
                                                    use in vapor degreasing; to prohibit the                instructions provided under ADDRESSES                 determined there is not enough data and
                                                    use of TCE in vapor degreasing; to                      in the Federal Register documents of                  information available to support moving
                                                    require manufacturers (including                        January 19, 2017, (82 FR 7432) (FRL–                  forward with a rulemaking action.
                                                    importers), processors, and distributors,               9950–08) or (82 FR 7464) (FRL–9958–                   DATES: The ANPRM ‘‘State Inspection
                                                    except for retailers, of TCE for any use                57). If you have questions, consult the               Programs for Passenger-Carrier
                                                    to provide downstream notification of                   technical person listed under FOR                     Vehicles,’’ published on April 27, 2016
                                                    these prohibitions throughout the                       FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.                          (81 FR 24769), is withdrawn as of May
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                    supply chain; and to require limited                                                                          1, 2017.
                                                                                                            List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 751
                                                    recordkeeping. In the second notice,                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
                                                    EPA proposed a rule under section 6 of                    Environmental protection, Chemicals,                Loretta Bitner, Chief, Commercial
                                                    TSCA to prohibit the manufacture                        Export notification, Hazardous                        Passenger Carrier Safety Division at
                                                    (including import), processing, and                     substances, Import certification,                     202–385–2428, or via email at
                                                    distribution in commerce of methylene                   Methylene Chloride, N-                                Loretta.Bitner@dot.gov, Federal Motor
                                                    chloride and N-methylpyrrolidone                        Methylpyrrolidone, Trichloroethylene,                 Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
                                                    (NMP) for consumer and most types of                    Recordkeeping.                                        New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:54 Apr 28, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00024   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM   01MYP1


                                                    20312                      Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                    DC 20590–0001. If you have questions                    Discussion of Comments                                aware of data or information that
                                                    on viewing or submitting material to the                   The Agency received 22 public                      supports the development of a notice of
                                                    docket, contact Docket Services,                        comments, with 10 commenters                          proposed rulemaking to require the
                                                    telephone (202) 366–9826.                               expressing general opposition to the                  States to establish mandatory annual
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              mandatory State inspection requirement                inspection programs for passenger-
                                                    Background/Topics Addressed During                      discussed in the ANPRM. Seven                         carrying vehicles.
                                                    the Comment Period                                      commenters supported the                                 The Agency held a series public
                                                                                                            establishment of such a requirement;                  listening sessions 2 concerning this
                                                       In accordance with § 32710 of the                    four commenters neither supported nor
                                                    Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st                                                                         subject prior to publication of the
                                                                                                            opposed a possible requirement, and                   ANPRM. Those sessions provided
                                                    Century Act (MAP–21) (Pub. L. 112–                      one commenter’s issue was out-of-
                                                    141, 126 Stat. 405, 815), FMCSA                                                                               interested parties with the opportunity
                                                                                                            scope. Many commenters indicated that
                                                    published an ANPRM in the Federal                                                                             to share their views on the merits of
                                                                                                            the existing standards for annual
                                                    Register on April 27, 2016 (81 FR                       inspections prescribed in the Federal                 requiring State inspections of passenger
                                                    24769). The Agency sought information                   Motor Carrier Safety Regulations                      CMVs. Transcripts of the sessions are
                                                    from industry and other stakeholders on                 (FMCSRs) or their own programs were                   available in the public docket noted
                                                    the maintenance and inspection of                       sufficient. Commenters also indicated                 above. Stakeholders’ remarks and
                                                    passenger-carrying CMVs that would                      that current standards are effective at               comments proved valuable in
                                                    help FMCSA decide whether to propose                    mitigating risk when properly enforced.               developing the questions posed in the
                                                    a rule that mandates States to impose an                Several commenters made their support                 ANPRM, but the information they
                                                    annual inspection process.                              contingent on factors such as uniformity              provided was not sufficient to support
                                                       FMCSA requested information from                     in inspection standards, standardization              moving beyond the ANPRM. The
                                                    commercial passenger carriers and other                 of inspector training, a self-inspection              Agency received a broad range of
                                                    stakeholders in order to consider                       option, and required reciprocity,                     comments identifying issues FMCSA
                                                    proposing a rule that would require the                 whereby States would be required to                   would need to consider in a rulemaking,
                                                    States to establish annual inspection                   recognize inspections conducted                       such as the costs of mandatory
                                                    programs for passenger-carrying CMVs.                   outside their States.                                 inspection programs, the value of a
                                                    The requested information was                              Several commenters, including State                nation-wide uniform inspection
                                                    necessary to assist FMCSA in                            agencies in Michigan, Pennsylvania,                   standard, and the need for national
                                                    quantifying the economic benefits and                   and Texas, addressed questions aimed
                                                    costs of potentially moving forward                                                                           training of inspectors to eliminate
                                                                                                            at measuring the effectiveness of
                                                    with establishing an inspection program                                                                       inconsistencies in how inspection
                                                                                                            inspection programs. However, none of
                                                    and in assessing risks associated with                  these commenters was able to determine                standards are applied. Both industry
                                                    improperly maintained or inspected                      whether the establishment of an                       and the enforcement community
                                                    passenger-carrying CMVs. The ANPRM                      inspection program reduced the number                 expressed concerns about the cost of an
                                                    also was intended to provide                            of safety violations detected. Michigan’s             inspection program. Stakeholders’
                                                    information on the effectiveness of                     Department of Motor Vehicles indicated                estimates of costs for program
                                                    existing Federal inspection                             it improved its inspection process by                 administration and individual
                                                    requirements in mitigating risks and                    educating carriers on the required State              inspections varied significantly.
                                                    ensuring safe and proper operations.1 In                inspection criteria in 2013; it has since                The Agency does not foresee the
                                                    the effort to gather relevant data,                     observed a 10% increase in vehicles                   availability of Federal funding to
                                                    FMCSA posed a series of questions                       passing their initial safety inspection.              incentivize the States to adopt such
                                                    addressing the following matters:                          Few commenters addressed how                       programs under its existing grant
                                                       • Existing State Mandatory Vehicle                   FMCSA might incentivize the States to
                                                                                                                                                                  programs.
                                                    Inspection Programs for Passenger-                      establish mandatory inspection
                                                    Carrying CMVs.                                          programs. The South Carolina Transport                  Issued under the authority of delegation in
                                                       • Measuring Effectiveness of                         Police noted that a mandate would be a                49 CFR 1.87 on: April 25, 2017.
                                                    Inspection Programs.                                    strain on its resources. The Michigan                 Daphne Y. Jefferson,
                                                       • Inspection Facilities and Locations.               Department of Transportation noted that               Deputy Administrator.
                                                       • Costs.                                             a program should be subsidized with                   [FR Doc. 2017–08724 Filed 4–28–17; 8:45 am]
                                                       • Uniformity of Mandatory Vehicle                    Federal funding. A representative from
                                                    Inspections Programs.                                                                                         BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
                                                                                                            Pennsylvania suggested providing
                                                       • Current Federal Standards.                         additional Federal highway funding to
                                                       • Federal Authority.                                 those States with well-defined                          2 The listening sessions were conducted at the


                                                       1 Subsequent to publication of the ANPRM,
                                                                                                            programs.                                             American Bus Association Marketplace in St. Louis,
                                                                                                                                                                  Missouri on January 13, 2015, a United Motor
                                                    FMCSA issued a rule that eliminated the option of       FMCSA Decision                                        Coach Association meeting in New Orleans,
                                                    relying on roadside inspections as satisfying the                                                             Louisiana on January 18, 2015, and a Commercial
                                                    periodic inspection requirement. See 81 FR 47722         FMCSA withdraws the April 2016
                                                                                                                                                                  Vehicle Safety Alliance workshop in Jacksonville,
                                                    (July 22, 2016).                                        ANPRM because the Agency is not
                                                                                                                                                                  Florida on April 14, 2015.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:54 Apr 28, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00025   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM   01MYP1



Document Created: 2017-04-29 03:16:15
Document Modified: 2017-04-29 03:16:15
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionAdvance notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.
DatesThe ANPRM ``State Inspection Programs for Passenger-Carrier Vehicles,'' published on April 27, 2016 (81 FR 24769), is withdrawn as of May 1, 2017.
ContactMs. Loretta Bitner, Chief, Commercial Passenger Carrier Safety Division at 202-385-2428, or via email at [email protected], Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation82 FR 20311 
RIN Number2126-AB84

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR