82_FR_20425 82 FR 20343 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations

82 FR 20343 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 82 (May 1, 2017)

Page Range20343-20345
FR Document2017-08706

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the utility of government information, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on the Study to Explore Early Development, Teen Follow-Up Study (SEED Teen).

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20343-20345]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60Day-17-17ADR; Docket No. CDC-2017-0042]


Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice with comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the 
utility of government information, invites the general public and other 
Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on the Study to 
Explore Early Development, Teen Follow-Up Study (SEED Teen).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 30, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2017-
0042 by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review 
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road 
NE., MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and Docket number. All relevant comments received will be posted 
without change to Regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided. For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the 
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan 
and instruments, contact Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection 
Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 
Road NE., MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 6501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of the 
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires 
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register 
concerning each proposed collection of the information, including each 
new proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection 
of information, and each reinstatement of previously approved 
information collection before submitting the collection to OMB for 
approval. To comply with this requirement, we are publishing this 
notice of a proposed data collection as described below.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) approval. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) 
estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Burden 
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by 
persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information 
to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review 
instructions; to develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and 
systems for the purpose of collecting, validating and verifying 
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and 
providing information; to train personnel and to be able to respond to 
a collection of information, to search data sources, to complete and 
review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise 
disclose the information. Written comments should be received within 60 
days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Study to Explore Early Development, Teen Follow-Up Study (SEED 
Teen)--New--National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental 
Disabilities (NCBDDD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder 
characterized by impairments in social interaction and communication 
and stereotyped behaviors and interests. The U.S. prevalence of ASD is 
estimated at 1% to 2%. In addition to the profound, lifelong impacts on 
individuals' functioning given the core deficits in social-
communication abilities, a high proportion of children with ASD also 
have one or more other developmental impairments such as intellectual 
disability or attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder and children 
with ASDs have higher than expected

[[Page 20344]]

prevalences of health conditions such as obesity, asthma and 
respiratory disorders, eczema and skin allergies, migraine headaches, 
and gastrointestinal symptoms and disorders.
    Historically, young children have been the focus of ASD research: 
Diagnosis and symptom detection at young ages, prenatal or early-life 
risk factors, and the effect of early intervention programs. Meanwhile, 
the number of children diagnosed with ASD each year has steadily 
increased and, as children age, the prevalence of adults diagnosed with 
ASD will likewise increase for several decades. Despite this ongoing 
demographic shift --which some have called ``the autism tsunami''--
there has been relatively little research on ASD in adolescence and 
adulthood.
    While there is research showing that the majority of ASD diagnoses 
made in early childhood are retained in adolescence with mostly stable 
in symptom severity, there are major gaps in our understanding of the 
health, functioning, and experiences of adolescents with ASD and other 
developmental disabilities. Many of these topics are especially 
relevant to public health: Adolescents and adults with ASD have been 
shown to have frequent health problems, high healthcare utilization and 
specialized service needs, high caregiving burden, require substantial 
supports to perform daily activities, are likely to be bullied, or 
isolated from society, and are likely to have food allergies or put on 
restrictive diets of questionable benefit. Many of these problems 
emerge after early childhood, and more studies are needed to estimate 
the frequency, severity, and predictive factors for these important 
outcomes in diverse cohorts of individuals with autism and other 
developmental conditions.
    SEED Teen is a follow-up study of children who participated in the 
first phase of the SEED case-control study (SEED 1) in 2007-2011 when 
they were 2 to 5 years of age. SEED includes one of the largest cohorts 
of children assembled with ASD. Children will be identified from four 
SEED sites in Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. 
Three groups of children will be included: Children with ASD, children 
with other developmental (non-ASD) conditions (DD comparison group), 
and children from the general population who were initially sampled 
from birth records (POP comparison group).
    The children and parents previously enrolled in SEED 1 represent a 
unique opportunity to better understand the long-term trajectory of 
children identified as having ASD at early ages. Mothers or other 
primary caregivers who participated in SEED 1 will be re-contacted when 
their child is 13-17 years of age and asked to complete two self-
administered questionnaires (SEED Teen Health and Development Survey 
and the Social Responsiveness Scale) about their child's health, 
development, education, and current functioning. Information from this 
study will allow researchers to assess the long-term health and 
functioning of children with ASD and other developmental disabilities, 
family impacts associated with ASD and other DDs, and service needs and 
use associated with having and ASD and other DDs, particularly during 
the teen years.
    We estimate that 1,410 SEED families are potentially eligible to 
participate in SEED Teen. Reading the letter and other materials in the 
invitation mailing will take approximately five minutes. We estimate 
that a minimum of 60% of parents/caregivers sent the invitation mailing 
or will be successfully contacted and participate in the invitation 
call (approximately 15 minutes). We estimate that 80% of the families 
who participate in the invitation call will meet the eligibility 
criteria for SEED Teen and 70% of those will enroll in SEED Teen. We 
assume all enrolled families will complete the follow-up call to 
confirm data collection packet receipt (approximately 10 minutes) and 
will review the materials in the data collection packet. Finally, we 
estimate that 90% of enrolled parents/caregivers will complete two 
self-administered questionnaires (SEED Teen Health and Development 
Survey and the Social Responsiveness Scale) and two supplemental 
consent forms. The two questionnaires will take approximately 60 
minutes to complete, plus an additional 5 minutes to read and sign the 
informed consent. Therefore, we estimate the total burden hours are 
911. There are no costs to participants other than their time.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                 Number      Average
                                                                  Number of    responses    burden per    Total
         Type of respondents                   Form name         respondents      per        response    burden
                                                                               respondent   (in hours)    hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eligible families who were enrolled    Invitation Packet.......        1,410            1         5/60       118
 in SEED 1.
Eligible families who were enrolled    Invitation Call Script..          846            1        15/60       212
 in SEED 1.
Families who agreed to participate in  Follow-up Call Checklist          474            1        10/60        79
 SEED Teen.
Families who agreed to participate in  Data Collection Packet..          474            1         5/60        40
 SEED Teen.
Families who agreed to participate in  SEED Teen Health and              427            1        40/60       284
 SEED Teen.                             Development Survey.
Families who agreed to participate in  Social Responsiveness             427            1        20/60       142
 SEED Teen.                             Scale.
Families who agreed to participate in  Supplemental Consent              427            1         5/60        36
 SEED Teen.                             Forms.
                                      --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total............................  ........................  ...........  ...........  ...........       911
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-08706 Filed 4-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Notices 20343 ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued Average Number of Number of burden per Type of respondents Form name responses per respondents response respondent (in hours) DP13–1315 Partners ...................................... Case Study Interview Guide for DP1–1315 2 1 1 Partners. NCCCP and NSBT Program Directors, Staff, Web-based survey ......................................... 780 1 15/60 Coalition Members, and Partners. NCCCP and NSBT Program Directors, Staff, In-Depth Interview Guide ............................... 5 1 0.5 Coalition Members, and Partners. Leroy A. Richardson, Instructions: All submissions received information to be collected; (d) ways to Chief, Information Collection Review Office, must include the agency name and minimize the burden of the collection of Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Docket number. All relevant comments information on respondents, including Associate Director for Science, Office of the received will be posted without change through the use of automated collection Director, Centers for Disease Control and to Regulations.gov, including any techniques or other forms of information Prevention. personal information provided. For technology; and (e) estimates of capital [FR Doc. 2017–08705 Filed 4–28–17; 8:45 am] access to the docket to read background or start-up costs and costs of operation, BILLING CODE 4163–18–P documents or comments received, go to maintenance, and purchase of services Regulations.gov. to provide information. Burden means FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To the total time, effort, or financial DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND resources expended by persons to request more information on the HUMAN SERVICES generate, maintain, retain, disclose or proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and provide information to or for a Federal Centers for Disease Control and agency. This includes the time needed Prevention instruments, contact Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection to review instructions; to develop, Review Office, Centers for Disease acquire, install and utilize technology [60Day–17–17ADR; Docket No. CDC–2017– and systems for the purpose of 0042] Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS–D74, Atlanta, Georgia collecting, validating and verifying 30329; phone: 404–639–7570; Email: information, processing and Proposed Data Collections Submitted omb@cdc.gov. maintaining information, and disclosing for Public Comment and and providing information; to train Recommendations SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the personnel and to be able to respond to Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and a collection of information, to search (44 U.S.C. 6501–3520), Federal agencies data sources, to complete and review Prevention (CDC), Department of Health must obtain approval from the Office of and Human Services (HHS). the collection of information; and to Management and Budget (OMB) for each transmit or otherwise disclose the ACTION: Notice with comment period. collection of the information they information. Written comments should conduct or sponsor. In addition, the be received within 60 days of this SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease PRA also requires Federal agencies to Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of notice. provide a 60-day notice in the Federal its continuing effort to reduce public Register concerning each proposed Proposed Project burden and maximize the utility of collection of the information, including government information, invites the Study to Explore Early Development, each new proposed collection, each Teen Follow-Up Study (SEED Teen)— general public and other Federal proposed extension of existing agencies to take this opportunity to New—National Center on Birth Defects collection of information, and each and Developmental Disabilities comment on proposed and/or reinstatement of previously approved continuing information collections, as (NCBDDD), Centers for Disease Control information collection before submitting and Prevention (CDC). required by the Paperwork Reduction the collection to OMB for approval. To Act of 1995. This notice invites comply with this requirement, we are Background and Brief Description comment on the Study to Explore Early publishing this notice of a proposed Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a Development, Teen Follow-Up Study data collection as described below. neurodevelopmental disorder (SEED Teen). Comments submitted in response to characterized by impairments in social DATES: Written comments must be this notice will be summarized and/or interaction and communication and received on or before June 30, 2017. included in the request for Office of stereotyped behaviors and interests. The ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, Management and Budget (OMB) U.S. prevalence of ASD is estimated at identified by Docket No. CDC–2017– approval. Comments are invited on: (a) 1% to 2%. In addition to the profound, 0042 by any of the following methods: Whether the proposed collection of lifelong impacts on individuals’ • Federal eRulemaking Portal: information is necessary for the proper functioning given the core deficits in srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions performance of the functions of the social-communication abilities, a high for submitting comments. agency, including whether the proportion of children with ASD also • Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, information shall have practical utility; have one or more other developmental Information Collection Review Office, (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate impairments such as intellectual Centers for Disease Control and of the burden of the proposed collection disability or attention-deficit- Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS– of information; (c) ways to enhance the hyperactivity-disorder and children D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329. quality, utility, and clarity of the with ASDs have higher than expected VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:35 Apr 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1

20344 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Notices prevalences of health conditions such as restrictive diets of questionable benefit. health and functioning of children with obesity, asthma and respiratory Many of these problems emerge after ASD and other developmental disorders, eczema and skin allergies, early childhood, and more studies are disabilities, family impacts associated migraine headaches, and needed to estimate the frequency, with ASD and other DDs, and service gastrointestinal symptoms and severity, and predictive factors for these needs and use associated with having disorders. important outcomes in diverse cohorts and ASD and other DDs, particularly Historically, young children have of individuals with autism and other during the teen years. been the focus of ASD research: developmental conditions. We estimate that 1,410 SEED families Diagnosis and symptom detection at SEED Teen is a follow-up study of young ages, prenatal or early-life risk children who participated in the first are potentially eligible to participate in factors, and the effect of early phase of the SEED case-control study SEED Teen. Reading the letter and other intervention programs. Meanwhile, the (SEED 1) in 2007–2011 when they were materials in the invitation mailing will number of children diagnosed with ASD 2 to 5 years of age. SEED includes one take approximately five minutes. We each year has steadily increased and, as of the largest cohorts of children estimate that a minimum of 60% of children age, the prevalence of adults assembled with ASD. Children will be parents/caregivers sent the invitation diagnosed with ASD will likewise identified from four SEED sites in mailing or will be successfully increase for several decades. Despite Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, and contacted and participate in the this ongoing demographic shift —which Pennsylvania. Three groups of children invitation call (approximately 15 some have called ‘‘the autism will be included: Children with ASD, minutes). We estimate that 80% of the tsunami’’—there has been relatively children with other developmental families who participate in the little research on ASD in adolescence (non-ASD) conditions (DD comparison invitation call will meet the eligibility and adulthood. group), and children from the general criteria for SEED Teen and 70% of those While there is research showing that population who were initially sampled will enroll in SEED Teen. We assume all the majority of ASD diagnoses made in from birth records (POP comparison enrolled families will complete the early childhood are retained in group). follow-up call to confirm data collection adolescence with mostly stable in The children and parents previously packet receipt (approximately 10 symptom severity, there are major gaps enrolled in SEED 1 represent a unique minutes) and will review the materials in our understanding of the health, opportunity to better understand the in the data collection packet. Finally, functioning, and experiences of long-term trajectory of children we estimate that 90% of enrolled adolescents with ASD and other identified as having ASD at early ages. parents/caregivers will complete two developmental disabilities. Many of Mothers or other primary caregivers self-administered questionnaires (SEED these topics are especially relevant to who participated in SEED 1 will be re- Teen Health and Development Survey public health: Adolescents and adults contacted when their child is 13–17 and the Social Responsiveness Scale) with ASD have been shown to have years of age and asked to complete two and two supplemental consent forms. frequent health problems, high self-administered questionnaires (SEED The two questionnaires will take healthcare utilization and specialized Teen Health and Development Survey approximately 60 minutes to complete, service needs, high caregiving burden, and the Social Responsiveness Scale) plus an additional 5 minutes to read and require substantial supports to perform about their child’s health, development, sign the informed consent. Therefore, daily activities, are likely to be bullied, education, and current functioning. we estimate the total burden hours are or isolated from society, and are likely Information from this study will allow 911. There are no costs to participants to have food allergies or put on researchers to assess the long-term other than their time. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number Average Total Number of responses burden per Type of respondents Form name burden respondents per response hours respondent (in hours) Eligible families who were enrolled in SEED 1 ........... Invitation Packet ........................... 1,410 1 5/60 118 Eligible families who were enrolled in SEED 1 ........... Invitation Call Script ..................... 846 1 15/60 212 Families who agreed to participate in SEED Teen ..... Follow-up Call Checklist .............. 474 1 10/60 79 Families who agreed to participate in SEED Teen ..... Data Collection Packet ................ 474 1 5/60 40 Families who agreed to participate in SEED Teen ..... SEED Teen Health and Develop- 427 1 40/60 284 ment Survey. Families who agreed to participate in SEED Teen ..... Social Responsiveness Scale ...... 427 1 20/60 142 Families who agreed to participate in SEED Teen ..... Supplemental Consent Forms ..... 427 1 5/60 36 Total ..................................................................... ...................................................... .................... .................... .................... 911 Leroy A. Richardson, srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2017–08706 Filed 4–28–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:57 Apr 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 82 / Monday, May 1, 2017 / Notices 20345 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 1. Implementation Study. The goal of assignment to a subset of the sample. HUMAN SERVICES the implementation study is to provide The survey will gather information on a detailed description of the PJAC participant experiences with the child Administration for Children and programs—how they are implemented, support program and family court, Families their participants, the contexts in which family relationships, parenting and co- they are operated, and their promising parenting, informal child support Proposed Information Collection practices. The implementation study payments, and job characteristics. In an Activity; Comment Request will also assess whether the PJAC effort to enhance response rates, the Proposed Projects interventions are implemented as PJAC survey firm will attempt to track intended (implementation fidelity) as survey sample members at a few points Title: Procedural Justice Informed well as how the treatment implemented over the 12-month follow-up period in Alternatives to Contempt (PJAC). differed from the status quo (treatment order to stay in touch with them and OMB No.: 0970—NEW. contrast). The detailed descriptions will gather updated contact information from Description assist in interpreting program impacts them. and identifying program features and 3. Benefit-Cost Study: The benefit-cost The Office of Child Support conditions necessary for effective study will estimate the costs and Enforcement (OCSE) within the program replication or improvement. benefits associated with the Administration for Children and Key activities of the implementation implementation and impact of the PJAC Families (ACF) is proposing data study will include: (1) A Management interventions. The study will examine collection activity as part of the Information System (MIS) for collection the costs and benefits from the Procedural Justice Informed and analysis of program participation perspective of the government, Alternatives to Contempt Demonstration data to track participant engagement in noncustodial parents, custodial parents (PJAC). In September 2016, OCSE issued PJAC activities; (2) semi-structured and their children, and society. Once grants to six child support agencies to interviews with program staff and staff measured, particular impacts or provide alternative approaches to the from selected community partner expenditures will constitute benefits or contempt process with the goal of organizations; (3) semi-structured costs, depending on which analytical increasing parents’ compliance with interviews with program participants to perspective is considered. For each of child support orders by building trust learn about their experiences in PJAC; the perspectives, pertinent benefits and and confidence in the child support and (4) a staff questionnaire to gather costs will be added together to agency and its processes. PJAC is a five- broader quantitative information on determine the net value of the program. year project (the first year of which is program implementation and staff Key hypothesized benefits and costs to dedicated to planning) that will allow experiences. be assessed include increased PJAC grantees to learn whether incorporating 2. Impact Study: The goal of the intervention costs, reduced costs for principles of procedural justice into impact study is to provide rigorous contempt actions, increased payments child support business practices estimates of the effectiveness of the six from non-custodial parents, reduced increases reliable child support programs using an experimental court costs, and reduced jail time, payments. In addition to increasing research design. Program applicants among others. The benefit-cost study reliable payments, the PJAC who are eligible for PJAC services will will rely on the results of the impact intervention aims to reduce arrears, be randomly assigned to either a study, analysis of participation data minimize the need for continued program group that is offered program from the MIS, and results of a staff time enforcement actions and sanctions, and services or to a control group that is not study in order to quantify various PJAC- reduce the inefficient use of contempt offered those services. The random related costs and benefits. proceedings. assignment process will require child This 60-Day Notice covers the The PJAC evaluation will yield support program staff to complete a following data collection activities: (1) information about the efficacy of brief data entry protocol. The impact Staff data entry for random assignment; applying procedural justice principles study will rely on administrative data (2) Study MIS to track program via a set of alternative services to the from state and county child support participation; (3) Staff and community current contempt process. It will systems, court records, criminal justice partner interview topic guide; (4) generate extensive knowledge regarding records, and data from the National Participant interview topic guide; and how PJAC programs operate, the effects Directory of New Hires. Administrative (5) Participant survey tracking letter. the programs have, and whether their records data will be used to estimate benefits exceed their costs. The impacts on child support payments, Respondents information gathered will be critical to enforcement actions, contempt Respondents for the first information informing future policy decisions proceedings, jail stays, and employment collection phase include study related to contempt. and earnings. The impact study will participants and grantee staff and The PJAC evaluation will include the also include a follow-up survey of community partners. Specific following three interconnected participants that will be administered respondents per instrument are noted in components or ‘‘studies’’: approximately 12 months after random the burden table below. ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Number of Average Number of Total burden Total annual Instrument responses per burden hours respondents hours burden hours respondent per response Staff data entry for random assignment ............................ 120 150 0.05 900 300 VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:57 Apr 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1


Document Created: 2017-04-29 03:16:21
Document Modified: 2017-04-29 03:16:21
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice with comment period.
DatesWritten comments must be received on or before June 30, 2017.
ContactTo request more information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, contact Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email: [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 20343 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR