82_FR_20639 82 FR 20555 - Bonding Requirements for Recipients

82 FR 20555 - Bonding Requirements for Recipients

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 84 (May 3, 2017)

Page Range20555-20558
FR Document2017-08857

This proposed rule would revise the Legal Services Corporation's (LSC or Corporation) regulation about bonding requirements for LSC recipients. It would require recipients to bond all their employees and to ensure that third parties who handle recipients' funds have bond coverage, allow recipients to use other forms of insurance similar to fidelity bonds, raise the minimum level of coverage, and allow recipients to use LSC funds to pay for bonding costs. This proposed rule will update part 1629 to reflect current insurance practices and simplify the language in the rule to reduce confusion.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 84 (Wednesday, May 3, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 3, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20555-20558]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08857]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

45 CFR Part 1629


Bonding Requirements for Recipients

AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would revise the Legal Services 
Corporation's (LSC or Corporation) regulation about bonding 
requirements for LSC

[[Page 20556]]

recipients. It would require recipients to bond all their employees and 
to ensure that third parties who handle recipients' funds have bond 
coverage, allow recipients to use other forms of insurance similar to 
fidelity bonds, raise the minimum level of coverage, and allow 
recipients to use LSC funds to pay for bonding costs. This proposed 
rule will update part 1629 to reflect current insurance practices and 
simplify the language in the rule to reduce confusion.

DATES: Comments must be received by June 2, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: Follow the instructions for 
submitting comments.
     Email: [email protected]. Include ``Part 1629 
Rulemaking'' in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: (202) 337-6519.
     Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal 
Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: 
Part 1629 Rulemaking.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant 
General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Part 1629 Rulemaking.
     Instructions: LSC prefers electronic submissions via email 
with attachments in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not consider written 
comments sent to any other address or received after the end of the 
comment period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General 
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC 
20007; (202) 295-1563 (phone), (202) 337-6519 (fax), or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Regulatory Background

    LSC created part 1629 in 1984 after several instances in which 
recipients lost LSC funds through the dishonest behavior of persons 
associated with the recipient. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984. While the 
recipient recovered the funds in some cases, in others, the recipient 
had to absorb the loss. Id.
    Before enacting part 1629, LSC recommended that recipients have 
fidelity coverage as a basic internal control. See LSC Audit and 
Accounting Guide for Recipients and Auditors, revised June 1977, p. 3-
3. LSC intended part 1629 to ``make mandatory [this] important 
protection for the limited funds available to serve eligible clients.'' 
49 FR 23396, June 6, 1984. LSC originally proposed requiring programs 
to obtain fidelity bond coverage at a minimum level equal to 25% of the 
recipient's annualized LSC funding. Id. Based on comments received in 
response to the proposed rule, LSC decreased the required coverage 
level to 10%. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984. LSC also set a $50,000 
minimum coverage level ``in response to the recognition that a loss to 
a small program is proportionally greater in effect than a similar one 
to a large program.'' Id.
    LSC added rulemaking on part 1629 to its annual rulemaking agenda 
in April 2016. Regulatory action is justified for three reasons. First, 
the regulation is outdated. LSC has not revised part 1629 since it was 
adopted in 1984, and LSC should update it to reflect current insurance 
practices.
    Second, the regulation was derived from a source that does not 
provide the optimal model for a federally funded grant-making entity 
today. The original rule was based on fidelity bonding provisions found 
in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). See 
Section 412 of Public Law 93-406, and related regulations at 29 CFR 
2550.412-1 and 29 CFR part 2580. ERISA concerns minimum standards for 
retirement plans in private industry. LSC no longer believes that this 
is an appropriate model for LSC to follow, and that instead LSC should 
look to current regulations governing similar grant-making entities and 
to reflect current insurance practices.
    Third, the current regulation is in some respects unclear or 
ambiguous. LSC has received requests for guidance on how to interpret 
certain provisions in part 1629, particularly those sections about the 
form and extent of coverage required by the rule. LSC does not believe 
that the language in part 1629 provides sufficiently clear guidance to 
LSC recipients or to LSC staff. LSC proposes crafting an approach that 
is tailored to LSC's needs and that simplifies the language in the rule 
to reduce confusion.
    On October 17, 2016, the Operations and Regulations Committee 
(Committee) of LSC's Board of Directors (Board) voted to recommend that 
the Board authorize rulemaking on part 1629. On October 19, 2016, the 
Board authorized LSC to begin rulemaking. On April 23, 2017, the 
Committee voted to recommend that the Board approve publication of this 
NPRM in the Federal Register for notice and public comment. On April 
24, 2017, the Board accepted the Committee's recommendation and voted 
to approve publication of this NPRM with a 30-day comment period.

II. Discussion of the Proposed Changes

Section 1629.1 Purpose

    LSC proposes to add a purpose section stating who must be covered 
under the bond and what losses the bond must protect against. Part 1629 
currently does not have a purpose section.

Section 1629.2 Definitions

    LSC proposes to define annualized funding level to include the 
amount of the Basic Field Grant and special purpose grant funds a 
recipient receives annually from LSC. LSC believes it is necessary to 
include ``special purpose grants'' of LSC funds, such as Technology 
Initiative Grants, Pro Bono Innovation Fund grants, and emergency 
relief grants, in the definition of ``annualized funding level'' to 
ensure that the maximum amount of LSC funds are protected.

Section 1629.3 Who must be bonded?

    LSC currently requires recipients to bond ``[e]very director, 
officer, employee and agent of a program who handles funds or property 
of the program . . . .'' 45 CFR 1629.2(a) (emphasis added). LSC 
considers the term ``handles'' to include access to funds or other 
recipient property or ``decision-making powers with respect to funds or 
property which can give rise to [] risk of loss.'' Id. Through a review 
of recipient insurance policies, LSC has found that most grantees have 
fidelity coverage for all their employees. This common practice exceeds 
the current minimum requirements of part 1629. When employees who were 
not required to be bonded under part 1629 have misappropriated LSC 
funds, grantees that exceeded the minimum part 1629 coverage have 
typically been protected from loss. LSC believes this common practice 
is desirable and proposes to require that recipients carry coverage for 
all employees, regardless of whether the employees ``handle'' program 
funds.
    LSC currently requires grantees to bond ``agents'' who handle funds 
or property of the program. 45 CFR 1629.2(a). But LSC has found that 
most recipients' policies do not cover the dishonest or fraudulent 
actions of agents and independent contractors. In fact, many policies 
explicitly exclude agents and independent contractors from the 
definition of ``covered employee.'' This exclusion is problematic, as 
LSC recipients often turn to third parties to handle payroll functions. 
See Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors, Operations and 
Regulations Committee, Transcript of Rulemaking Workshop, Wednesday, 
May 18, 2016, pp. 82-84

[[Page 20557]]

(comments of Diana White). This means that LSC funds are handled by 
persons outside of the recipient's control and insurance coverage. In 
areas where there are few insurers to choose from, it may be impossible 
for recipients to get insurance that covers ``agents'' or ``independent 
contractors.''
    To address these issues and adequately protect LSC funds from 
misappropriation by recipients and third parties, LSC proposes three 
changes to the existing rule. First, LSC proposes to require that 
recipients' bonds cover volunteers, in addition to directors, officers, 
employees, and agents of the recipient. Second, LSC proposes to require 
that recipients ensure that third parties who provide payroll, billing, 
and collection services to the recipient have fidelity bond coverage or 
similar insurance. The recipient may accomplish this either by 
extending its own insurance to the third party or by ensuring that the 
third party has its own fidelity bond coverage sufficient to protect 
LSC funds in the third party's hands. Finally, LSC proposes to include 
language allowing recipients to either cover subrecipients through 
their own fidelity policies or ensure that the subrecipients have 
policies adequate to protect subgranted funds.

Section 1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients use?

    Current Sec.  1629.5 allows recipients to choose different forms of 
bonds, such as individual, blanket, or schedule. 45 CFR 1629.5. Section 
1629.5 currently does not address whether recipients may choose types 
of insurance other than a fidelity bond that achieve the same purpose 
as a fidelity bond. Most LSC recipients now protect against employee 
dishonesty through riders to their standard commercial crime policies. 
Few grantees obtain separate fidelity bonds.
    In 1999, LSC issued an external opinion permitting recipients to 
use employee dishonesty insurance to satisfy the bonding requirements 
of part 1629 if the recipient could show that the policy gives the same 
level of protection as a fidelity bond. See External Opinion 1999-10-
26, part 1629 Purchase of Employee Dishonesty Insurance in Lieu of a 
Fidelity Bond (October 26, 1999). To reflect this long-standing LSC 
policy, LSC proposes revising part 1629 to expressly allow recipients 
to substitute employee dishonesty policies or other methods of coverage 
for fidelity bonds. This revision gives recipients greater flexibility 
to choose the most readily available and cost-effective methods of 
insuring LSC funds. The revision also will make clear that the 
substance and amount of coverage is more important than the form.

Section 1629.5 What losses must the bond cover?

    Current Sec.  1629.4 requires recipients to have bonds that protect 
them against ``all those risks of loss that might arise through 
dishonest or fraudulent acts in the handling of funds [.]'' The strict 
language--``all those risks of loss''--implies that recipients must be 
completely covered in the event of a loss, and that policies with 
deductibles would not be acceptable under current part 1629. That is 
because if a recipient has LSC funds stolen, and the policy requires 
the recipient to absorb a portion of that loss by paying a deductible, 
then the recipient's policy did not cover against ``all those risks of 
loss.'' Such strict language makes sense under ERISA statutes and 
regulations, as they are designed to protect retirees' pension funds. 
But such language may prevent recipients from obtaining policies that 
will protect LSC funds adequately if policies without deductibles are 
prohibitively expensive.
    LSC proposes to simplify the language about the types of losses 
that the bond must cover and to revise the rule to allow recipients to 
purchase policies that require payment of deductibles. LSC proposes 
revising the definition to state simply that the ``bond must provide 
recovery for loss caused by such acts as: Fraud, dishonesty, larceny, 
theft, embezzlement, forgery, misappropriation, wrongful abstraction, 
wrongful conversion, willful misapplication, or any other fraudulent or 
dishonest act committed by an employee, officer, director, agent, or 
volunteer.''

Section 1629.6 What is the required minimum level of coverage?

    Under the existing rule, recipients must maintain bond coverage 
equal to at least 10% of the recipient's annualized LSC funding or of 
the initial grant if the program is a new grantee. 45 CFR 1629.1(a). 
The minimum level of coverage may never be less than $50,000. Id. LSC 
proposes to increase the minimum coverage level, which has remained 
unchanged since 1984. Based on a sampling of current recipients' 
policies, the majority of recipients already exceed the $50,000 minimum 
level of coverage. In fact, most policies provided coverage in excess 
of $100,000. Because the common practice among recipients already is to 
insure recipient funds above the minimum amount required by current 
Sec.  1629.1(a), LSC believes it is reasonable for LSC to raise the 
minimum coverage level to $100,000. LSC does not propose to change the 
minimum percentage for coverage.

Section 1629.7 May LSC funds be used to cover bonding costs?

    Part 1629 currently is silent as to which costs associated with 
fidelity bond coverage--deductibles, premiums, rates, and single loss 
retention--are allowable using LSC funds. To improve clarity on this 
point, LSC proposes to allow recipients to use LSC funds to pay for the 
costs of bonding under this part if they are (1) consistent with 45 CFR 
part 1630, (2) in accordance with sound business practice, and (3) 
reasonable. This proposed rule is based on the Uniform Guidance, which 
allows for such costs. See 2 CFR 200.427.
    LSC considered limiting the amount of deductibles that LSC would 
consider reasonable in the proposed rule. During the process of 
drafting this proposed rule, LSC examined a sample of recipients' 
current fidelity bonds and found that most of those recipients' 
policies have deductibles ranging from $1,000 to $5,000. LSC could not 
determine, based on research of external sources, whether there are 
current best practices in the nonprofit insurance world that would help 
LSC establish a reasonable limit on deductibles. LSC determined that it 
would need more data to set deductible limits and has therefore chosen 
to allow recipients the flexibility to consider the losses they are 
willing to absorb when deciding the appropriate deductibles.

List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1629

    Fidelity bond, Grant programs--law, Insurance, Legal services, 
Surety bonds.

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Legal Services 
Corporation proposes to revise 45 CFR part 1629 as follows:

PART 1629--BONDING REQUIREMENTS FOR RECIPIENTS

Sec.
1629.1 Purpose.
1629.2 Definitions.
1629.3 Who must be bonded?
1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients use?
1629.5 What losses must the bond cover?
1629.6 What is the required minimum level of coverage?
1629.7 Can LSC funds be used to cover bonding costs?

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996e(1)(A) and 2996f(3).


Sec.  1629.1  Purpose.

    This part is intended to protect LSC funds by requiring that 
recipients be

[[Page 20558]]

bonded or have similar insurance coverage to indemnify recipients 
against losses resulting from fraudulent or dishonest acts committed by 
one or more employees, officers, directors, agents, volunteers, and 
third-party contractors who handle LSC funds.


Sec.  1629.2  Definitions.

    Annualized funding level means the amount of:

(1) Basic Field Grant funds (including Agricultural Worker and Native 
American) and
(2) Special grants of LSC funds, including Technology Initiative 
Grants, Pro Bono Innovation Fund grants, and emergency relief grants, 
awarded by LSC to the recipient for the fiscal year included in the 
recipient's annual audited financial statements.


Sec.  1629.3  Who must be bonded?

    (a) A recipient must supply fidelity bond coverage for all 
employees, officers, directors, agents, and volunteers.
    (b) If a recipient uses a third party for payroll, billing, or 
collection services, the recipient must either supply coverage covering 
the third party or ensure that the third party has a fidelity bond or 
similar insurance coverage.
    (c) For recipients with subgrants:
    (1) The recipient must extend its fidelity bond coverage to supply 
identical coverage to the subrecipient and the subrecipient's 
directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers to the extent 
required to comply with this Part; or
    (2) The subrecipient must supply proof of its own fidelity bond 
coverage that meets the requirements of this Part for the 
subrecipient's directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.


Sec.  1629.4  What forms of bonds can recipients use?

    (a) A recipient may use any form of bond, such as individual, name 
schedule, position schedule, blanket, or any combination of such forms 
of bonds, as long as the type or combination of bonds secured 
adequately protects LSC funds.
    (b) A recipient may use similar forms of insurance that essentially 
fulfill the same purpose as a fidelity bond.


Sec.  1629.5  What losses must the bond cover?

    The bond must provide recovery for loss caused by such acts as 
fraud, dishonesty, larceny, theft, embezzlement, forgery, 
misappropriation, wrongful abstraction, wrongful conversion, willful 
misapplication, or any other fraudulent or dishonest act committed by 
an employee, officer, director, agent, or volunteer.


Sec.  1629.6  What is the required minimum level of coverage?

    (a) A recipient must carry fidelity bond coverage or similar 
coverage at a minimum level of at least ten percent of its annualized 
funding level for the previous fiscal year.
    (b) If a recipient is a new recipient, the coverage must be at a 
minimum level of at least ten percent of the initial grant.
    (c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, 
recipients must not carry coverage under this part at a level less than 
$100,000.


Sec.  1629.7  Can LSC funds be used to cover bonding costs?

    Costs of bonding required by this part are allowable if expended 
consistent with 45 CFR part 1630. Costs of bonding such as rates, 
deductibles, single loss retention, and premiums, are allowable as an 
indirect cost if such bonding is in accordance with sound business 
practice and is reasonable.

    Dated: April 27, 2017.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-08857 Filed 5-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7050-01-P



                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                                  20555

                                                 September 15, 2016. FAA Order                           incorporated by reference in 14 CFR                   Paragraph 5000        Class D Airspace Areas.
                                                 7400.11A is publicly available as listed                71.1. The Class E airspace designations               AGL MI D Battle Creek, MI [Amended]
                                                 in the ADDRESSES section of this                        listed in this document will be
                                                                                                                                                               Battle Creek, W.K. Kellogg Airport, MI
                                                 document. FAA Order 7400.11A lists                      published subsequently in the Order.                     (Lat. 42°18′23″ N., long. 85°15′00″ W.)
                                                 Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
                                                                                                         Regulatory Notices and Analyses                          That airspace extending upward from the
                                                 air traffic service routes, and reporting                                                                     surface to and including 3,500 feet MSL
                                                 points.                                                    The FAA has determined that this                   within a 4.5-mile radius of W.K. Kellogg
                                                 The Proposal                                            regulation only involves an established               Airport. This Class D airspace area is
                                                                                                         body of technical regulations for which               effective during the specific dates and times
                                                    The FAA is proposing an amendment                    frequent and routine amendments are                   established in advance by a Notice to
                                                 to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations                 necessary to keep them operationally                  Airmen. The effective dates and times will
                                                 (14 CFR) part 71 by amending Class D                    current, is non-controversial and                     thereafter be continuously published in the
                                                 airspace, Class E airspace designated as                unlikely to result in adverse or negative             Chart Supplement.
                                                 an extension, and Class E Airspace                      comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a                 *        *       *    *     *
                                                 extending upward from 700 feet above                    ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
                                                 the surface at W.K. Kellogg Airport                                                                           Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas
                                                                                                         Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a                   Designated as an Extension to a Class D or
                                                 (formerly W.K. Kellogg Field), Battle                   ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT                        Class E Surface Area.
                                                 Creek, MI.                                              Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
                                                    The airport name change to W.K.                                                                            *        *       *    *     *
                                                                                                         FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
                                                 Kellogg Airport from W.K. Kellogg Field                                                                       AGL MI E4 Battle Creek, MI [Amended]
                                                                                                         does not warrant preparation of a
                                                 and the airport’s geographic coordinates                                                                      Battle Creek, W.K. Kellogg Airport, MI
                                                                                                         regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
                                                 would be amended in the associated                                                                               (Lat. 42°18′23″ N., long. 85°15′00″ W.)
                                                                                                         impact is so minimal. Since this is a
                                                 Class D and Class E airspace listed in                                                                           That airspace extending upward from the
                                                                                                         routine matter that will only affect air
                                                 this proposal.                                                                                                surface within the 4.5-mile radius of W.K.
                                                    Class E extension area airspace would                traffic procedures and air navigation, it
                                                                                                         is certified that this rule, when                     Kellogg Airport. This Class E airspace area is
                                                 be amended by removing the Battle                                                                             effective during the specific dates and times
                                                 Creek VORTAC from the airspace                          promulgated, would not have a
                                                                                                                                                               established in advance by a Notice to
                                                 description due to its decommissioning.                 significant economic impact on a                      Airmen. The effective dates and times will
                                                    Also, Class E airspace extending                     substantial number of small entities                  thereafter be continuously published in the
                                                 upward from 700 feet above the surface                  under the criteria of the Regulatory                  Chart Supplement.
                                                 would be amended by removing the                        Flexibility Act.                                      *        *       *    *     *
                                                 southwest segment, and the segment 7                    Environmental Review                                  Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
                                                 miles northwest and 4.4 miles southeast                                                                       Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
                                                 of the Battle Creek ILS localizer                          This proposal will be subject to an
                                                                                                                                                               Above the Surface of the Earth.
                                                 northeast course extending 10.4 miles                   environmental analysis in accordance
                                                                                                         with FAA Order 1050.1F,                               *        *       *    *     *
                                                 northeast of the localizer outer marker/
                                                 nondirectional radio beacon. The                        ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and                 AGL MI E5 Battle Creek, MI [Amended]
                                                 northeast segment would be amended to                   Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final                   Battle Creek, W.K. Kellogg Airport, MI
                                                 within 2 miles each side of the 047°                    regulatory action.                                      (Lat. 42°18′23″ N., long. 85°15′00″ W.)
                                                 bearing (from 4 miles each side of the                  List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71                      That airspace extending upward from 700
                                                 049° bearing) from the airport extending                                                                      feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
                                                 from 7-mile radius of the airport to 10                  Airspace, Incorporation by reference,                of W.K. Kellogg Airport, and within 2 miles
                                                 miles northeast (from 10.9 miles) of the                Navigation (air).                                     each side of the 047° bearing from the airport
                                                 airport, and southeast segment would be                                                                       extending from the 7-mile radius to 10 miles
                                                                                                         The Proposed Amendment                                northeast of the airport, and within 2 miles
                                                 amended to within 2 miles each side of                                                                        each side of the 126° bearing from the airport
                                                 the 126° bearing from the airport                         Accordingly, pursuant to the
                                                                                                                                                               extending from the 7-mile radius to 7.4 miles
                                                 extending from the 7-mile radius to 7.4                 authority delegated to me, the Federal                southeast of the airport.
                                                 miles (from 11.1 miles) southeast of the                Aviation Administration proposes to
                                                                                                         amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:                        Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on April 25,
                                                 airport. This action would enhance the                                                                        2017.
                                                 safety and management of the standard
                                                                                                         PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,                       Walter Tweedy,
                                                 instrument approach procedures for IFR
                                                 operations at the airport. Additionally,                B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR                    Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
                                                                                                         TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND                           ATO Central Service Center.
                                                 this action would amend Class E
                                                 airspace extending upward from 700                      REPORTING POINTS                                      [FR Doc. 2017–08856 Filed 5–2–17; 8:45 am]
                                                 feet above the surface by removing                                                                            BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

                                                 reference to the BATOL navigation aid                   ■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
                                                 and Battle Creek ILS localizer. This                    part 71 continues to read as follows:
                                                 action would enhance the safety and                       Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,         LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
                                                 management of the standard instrument                   40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
                                                 approach procedures for IFR operations                  1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.                              45 CFR Part 1629
                                                 at the airport.                                         § 71.1   [Amended]                                    Bonding Requirements for Recipients
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                    Lastly, this action would replace the
                                                 outdated term Airport/Facility directory                ■ 2. The incorporation by reference in                AGENCY:       Legal Services Corporation.
                                                 with the term Chart Supplement.                         14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11A,
                                                                                                                                                               ACTION:       Notice of proposed rulemaking.
                                                    Class D and E airspace designations                  Airspace Designations and Reporting
                                                 are published in paragraph 5000, 6004                   Points, dated August 3, 2016, and                     SUMMARY:   This proposed rule would
                                                 and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order                    effective September 15, 2016, is                      revise the Legal Services Corporation’s
                                                 7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016, and                     amended as follows:                                   (LSC or Corporation) regulation about
                                                 effective September 15, 2016, which is                  *     *     *   *     *                               bonding requirements for LSC


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:34 May 02, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM       03MYP1


                                                 20556                   Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                 recipients. It would require recipients to              to obtain fidelity bond coverage at a                 II. Discussion of the Proposed Changes
                                                 bond all their employees and to ensure                  minimum level equal to 25% of the
                                                                                                                                                               Section 1629.1 Purpose
                                                 that third parties who handle recipients’               recipient’s annualized LSC funding. Id.
                                                 funds have bond coverage, allow                         Based on comments received in                           LSC proposes to add a purpose
                                                 recipients to use other forms of                        response to the proposed rule, LSC                    section stating who must be covered
                                                 insurance similar to fidelity bonds, raise              decreased the required coverage level to              under the bond and what losses the
                                                 the minimum level of coverage, and                      10%. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984. LSC                  bond must protect against. Part 1629
                                                 allow recipients to use LSC funds to pay                also set a $50,000 minimum coverage                   currently does not have a purpose
                                                 for bonding costs. This proposed rule                   level ‘‘in response to the recognition                section.
                                                 will update part 1629 to reflect current                that a loss to a small program is                     Section 1629.2 Definitions
                                                 insurance practices and simplify the                    proportionally greater in effect than a
                                                                                                                                                                  LSC proposes to define annualized
                                                 language in the rule to reduce                          similar one to a large program.’’ Id.
                                                                                                                                                               funding level to include the amount of
                                                 confusion.                                                 LSC added rulemaking on part 1629                  the Basic Field Grant and special
                                                 DATES: Comments must be received by                     to its annual rulemaking agenda in April              purpose grant funds a recipient receives
                                                 June 2, 2017.                                           2016. Regulatory action is justified for              annually from LSC. LSC believes it is
                                                 ADDRESSES: You may submit comments                      three reasons. First, the regulation is               necessary to include ‘‘special purpose
                                                 by any of the following methods:                        outdated. LSC has not revised part 1629               grants’’ of LSC funds, such as
                                                    • Federal Rulemaking Portal: Follow                  since it was adopted in 1984, and LSC                 Technology Initiative Grants, Pro Bono
                                                 the instructions for submitting                         should update it to reflect current                   Innovation Fund grants, and emergency
                                                 comments.                                               insurance practices.                                  relief grants, in the definition of
                                                    • Email: lscrulemaking@lsc.gov.                         Second, the regulation was derived                 ‘‘annualized funding level’’ to ensure
                                                 Include ‘‘Part 1629 Rulemaking’’ in the                 from a source that does not provide the               that the maximum amount of LSC funds
                                                 subject line of the message.                            optimal model for a federally funded                  are protected.
                                                    • Fax: (202) 337–6519.                               grant-making entity today. The original
                                                    • Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant                                                                       Section 1629.3 Who must be bonded?
                                                                                                         rule was based on fidelity bonding
                                                 General Counsel, Legal Services                         provisions found in the Employee                         LSC currently requires recipients to
                                                 Corporation, 3333 K Street NW.,                         Retirement Income Security Act of 1974                bond ‘‘[e]very director, officer,
                                                 Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Part                        (ERISA). See Section 412 of Public Law                employee and agent of a program who
                                                 1629 Rulemaking.                                        93–406, and related regulations at 29                 handles funds or property of the
                                                    • Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K.                 CFR 2550.412–1 and 29 CFR part 2580.                  program . . . .’’ 45 CFR 1629.2(a)
                                                 Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal                 ERISA concerns minimum standards for                  (emphasis added). LSC considers the
                                                 Services Corporation, 3333 K Street                     retirement plans in private industry.                 term ‘‘handles’’ to include access to
                                                 NW., Washington, DC 20007, ATTN:                        LSC no longer believes that this is an                funds or other recipient property or
                                                 Part 1629 Rulemaking.                                   appropriate model for LSC to follow,                  ‘‘decision-making powers with respect
                                                    • Instructions: LSC prefers electronic                                                                     to funds or property which can give rise
                                                                                                         and that instead LSC should look to
                                                 submissions via email with attachments                                                                        to [] risk of loss.’’ Id. Through a review
                                                                                                         current regulations governing similar
                                                 in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not                                                                           of recipient insurance policies, LSC has
                                                                                                         grant-making entities and to reflect
                                                 consider written comments sent to any                                                                         found that most grantees have fidelity
                                                                                                         current insurance practices.
                                                 other address or received after the end                                                                       coverage for all their employees. This
                                                 of the comment period.                                     Third, the current regulation is in                common practice exceeds the current
                                                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        some respects unclear or ambiguous.                   minimum requirements of part 1629.
                                                 Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General                    LSC has received requests for guidance                When employees who were not required
                                                 Counsel, Legal Services Corporation,                    on how to interpret certain provisions in             to be bonded under part 1629 have
                                                 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC                       part 1629, particularly those sections                misappropriated LSC funds, grantees
                                                 20007; (202) 295–1563 (phone), (202)                    about the form and extent of coverage                 that exceeded the minimum part 1629
                                                 337–6519 (fax), or sdavis@lsc.gov.                      required by the rule. LSC does not                    coverage have typically been protected
                                                                                                         believe that the language in part 1629                from loss. LSC believes this common
                                                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                         provides sufficiently clear guidance to               practice is desirable and proposes to
                                                 I. Regulatory Background                                LSC recipients or to LSC staff. LSC                   require that recipients carry coverage for
                                                    LSC created part 1629 in 1984 after                  proposes crafting an approach that is                 all employees, regardless of whether the
                                                 several instances in which recipients                   tailored to LSC’s needs and that                      employees ‘‘handle’’ program funds.
                                                 lost LSC funds through the dishonest                    simplifies the language in the rule to                   LSC currently requires grantees to
                                                 behavior of persons associated with the                 reduce confusion.                                     bond ‘‘agents’’ who handle funds or
                                                 recipient. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984.                     On October 17, 2016, the Operations                property of the program. 45 CFR
                                                 While the recipient recovered the funds                 and Regulations Committee (Committee)                 1629.2(a). But LSC has found that most
                                                 in some cases, in others, the recipient                 of LSC’s Board of Directors (Board)                   recipients’ policies do not cover the
                                                 had to absorb the loss. Id.                             voted to recommend that the Board                     dishonest or fraudulent actions of agents
                                                    Before enacting part 1629, LSC                       authorize rulemaking on part 1629. On                 and independent contractors. In fact,
                                                 recommended that recipients have                        October 19, 2016, the Board authorized                many policies explicitly exclude agents
                                                 fidelity coverage as a basic internal                   LSC to begin rulemaking. On April 23,                 and independent contractors from the
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 control. See LSC Audit and Accounting                   2017, the Committee voted to                          definition of ‘‘covered employee.’’ This
                                                 Guide for Recipients and Auditors,                      recommend that the Board approve                      exclusion is problematic, as LSC
                                                 revised June 1977, p. 3–3. LSC intended                 publication of this NPRM in the Federal               recipients often turn to third parties to
                                                 part 1629 to ‘‘make mandatory [this]                    Register for notice and public comment.               handle payroll functions. See Legal
                                                 important protection for the limited                    On April 24, 2017, the Board accepted                 Services Corporation Board of Directors,
                                                 funds available to serve eligible clients.’’            the Committee’s recommendation and                    Operations and Regulations Committee,
                                                 49 FR 23396, June 6, 1984. LSC                          voted to approve publication of this                  Transcript of Rulemaking Workshop,
                                                 originally proposed requiring programs                  NPRM with a 30-day comment period.                    Wednesday, May 18, 2016, pp. 82–84


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:34 May 02, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM   03MYP1


                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                              20557

                                                 (comments of Diana White). This means                   will make clear that the substance and                raise the minimum coverage level to
                                                 that LSC funds are handled by persons                   amount of coverage is more important                  $100,000. LSC does not propose to
                                                 outside of the recipient’s control and                  than the form.                                        change the minimum percentage for
                                                 insurance coverage. In areas where there                                                                      coverage.
                                                                                                         Section 1629.5 What losses must the
                                                 are few insurers to choose from, it may
                                                                                                         bond cover?                                           Section 1629.7 May LSC funds be used
                                                 be impossible for recipients to get
                                                 insurance that covers ‘‘agents’’ or                        Current § 1629.4 requires recipients to            to cover bonding costs?
                                                 ‘‘independent contractors.’’                            have bonds that protect them against                     Part 1629 currently is silent as to
                                                    To address these issues and                          ‘‘all those risks of loss that might arise            which costs associated with fidelity
                                                 adequately protect LSC funds from                       through dishonest or fraudulent acts in               bond coverage—deductibles, premiums,
                                                 misappropriation by recipients and                      the handling of funds [.]’’ The strict                rates, and single loss retention—are
                                                 third parties, LSC proposes three                       language—‘‘all those risks of loss’’—                 allowable using LSC funds. To improve
                                                 changes to the existing rule. First, LSC                implies that recipients must be                       clarity on this point, LSC proposes to
                                                 proposes to require that recipients’                    completely covered in the event of a                  allow recipients to use LSC funds to pay
                                                 bonds cover volunteers, in addition to                  loss, and that policies with deductibles              for the costs of bonding under this part
                                                 directors, officers, employees, and                     would not be acceptable under current                 if they are (1) consistent with 45 CFR
                                                 agents of the recipient. Second, LSC                    part 1629. That is because if a recipient             part 1630, (2) in accordance with sound
                                                 proposes to require that recipients                     has LSC funds stolen, and the policy                  business practice, and (3) reasonable.
                                                 ensure that third parties who provide                   requires the recipient to absorb a                    This proposed rule is based on the
                                                 payroll, billing, and collection services               portion of that loss by paying a                      Uniform Guidance, which allows for
                                                 to the recipient have fidelity bond                     deductible, then the recipient’s policy               such costs. See 2 CFR 200.427.
                                                 coverage or similar insurance. The                      did not cover against ‘‘all those risks of               LSC considered limiting the amount
                                                 recipient may accomplish this either by                 loss.’’ Such strict language makes sense              of deductibles that LSC would consider
                                                 extending its own insurance to the third                under ERISA statutes and regulations, as              reasonable in the proposed rule. During
                                                 party or by ensuring that the third party               they are designed to protect retirees’                the process of drafting this proposed
                                                 has its own fidelity bond coverage                      pension funds. But such language may                  rule, LSC examined a sample of
                                                 sufficient to protect LSC funds in the                  prevent recipients from obtaining                     recipients’ current fidelity bonds and
                                                 third party’s hands. Finally, LSC                       policies that will protect LSC funds                  found that most of those recipients’
                                                 proposes to include language allowing                   adequately if policies without                        policies have deductibles ranging from
                                                 recipients to either cover subrecipients                deductibles are prohibitively expensive.              $1,000 to $5,000. LSC could not
                                                 through their own fidelity policies or                     LSC proposes to simplify the language              determine, based on research of external
                                                 ensure that the subrecipients have                      about the types of losses that the bond               sources, whether there are current best
                                                 policies adequate to protect subgranted                 must cover and to revise the rule to                  practices in the nonprofit insurance
                                                 funds.                                                  allow recipients to purchase policies                 world that would help LSC establish a
                                                                                                         that require payment of deductibles.                  reasonable limit on deductibles. LSC
                                                 Section 1629.4 What forms of bonds                      LSC proposes revising the definition to
                                                 can recipients use?                                                                                           determined that it would need more
                                                                                                         state simply that the ‘‘bond must                     data to set deductible limits and has
                                                    Current § 1629.5 allows recipients to                provide recovery for loss caused by such              therefore chosen to allow recipients the
                                                 choose different forms of bonds, such as                acts as: Fraud, dishonesty, larceny,                  flexibility to consider the losses they are
                                                 individual, blanket, or schedule. 45 CFR                theft, embezzlement, forgery,                         willing to absorb when deciding the
                                                 1629.5. Section 1629.5 currently does                   misappropriation, wrongful abstraction,               appropriate deductibles.
                                                 not address whether recipients may                      wrongful conversion, willful
                                                 choose types of insurance other than a                  misapplication, or any other fraudulent               List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1629
                                                 fidelity bond that achieve the same                     or dishonest act committed by an                        Fidelity bond, Grant programs—law,
                                                 purpose as a fidelity bond. Most LSC                    employee, officer, director, agent, or                Insurance, Legal services, Surety bonds.
                                                 recipients now protect against employee                 volunteer.’’                                          ■ For the reasons set forth in the
                                                 dishonesty through riders to their
                                                 standard commercial crime policies.                     Section 1629.6 What is the required                   preamble, the Legal Services
                                                 Few grantees obtain separate fidelity                   minimum level of coverage?                            Corporation proposes to revise 45 CFR
                                                 bonds.                                                    Under the existing rule, recipients                 part 1629 as follows:
                                                    In 1999, LSC issued an external                      must maintain bond coverage equal to at               PART 1629—BONDING
                                                 opinion permitting recipients to use                    least 10% of the recipient’s annualized               REQUIREMENTS FOR RECIPIENTS
                                                 employee dishonesty insurance to                        LSC funding or of the initial grant if the
                                                 satisfy the bonding requirements of part                program is a new grantee. 45 CFR                      Sec.
                                                 1629 if the recipient could show that the               1629.1(a). The minimum level of                       1629.1 Purpose.
                                                 policy gives the same level of protection               coverage may never be less than                       1629.2 Definitions.
                                                 as a fidelity bond. See External Opinion                $50,000. Id. LSC proposes to increase                 1629.3 Who must be bonded?
                                                 1999–10–26, part 1629 Purchase of                       the minimum coverage level, which has                 1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients
                                                                                                                                                                    use?
                                                 Employee Dishonesty Insurance in Lieu                   remained unchanged since 1984. Based                  1629.5 What losses must the bond cover?
                                                 of a Fidelity Bond (October 26, 1999).                  on a sampling of current recipients’                  1629.6 What is the required minimum level
                                                 To reflect this long-standing LSC policy,               policies, the majority of recipients                       of coverage?
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 LSC proposes revising part 1629 to                      already exceed the $50,000 minimum                    1629.7 Can LSC funds be used to cover
                                                 expressly allow recipients to substitute                level of coverage. In fact, most policies                  bonding costs?
                                                 employee dishonesty policies or other                   provided coverage in excess of                          Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996e(1)(A) and
                                                 methods of coverage for fidelity bonds.                 $100,000. Because the common practice                 2996f(3).
                                                 This revision gives recipients greater                  among recipients already is to insure
                                                 flexibility to choose the most readily                  recipient funds above the minimum                     § 1629.1   Purpose.
                                                 available and cost-effective methods of                 amount required by current § 1629.1(a),                 This part is intended to protect LSC
                                                 insuring LSC funds. The revision also                   LSC believes it is reasonable for LSC to              funds by requiring that recipients be


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:34 May 02, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00004   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM   03MYP1


                                                 20558                   Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                 bonded or have similar insurance                        § 1629.5   What losses must the bond                  SUMMARY:   Petitions for Reconsideration
                                                 coverage to indemnify recipients against                cover?                                                (Petitions) have been filed in the
                                                 losses resulting from fraudulent or                       The bond must provide recovery for                  Commission’s rulemaking proceeding
                                                 dishonest acts committed by one or                      loss caused by such acts as fraud,                    by Jennifer A. Manner, on behalf of
                                                 more employees, officers, directors,                    dishonesty, larceny, theft,                           HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,
                                                 agents, volunteers, and third-party                     embezzlement, forgery,                                Bohdan R. Pankiw, on behalf of
                                                 contractors who handle LSC funds.                       misappropriation, wrongful abstraction,               Pennsylvania Public Utility
                                                                                                         wrongful conversion, willful                          Commission, and Arthur F. McNulty, on
                                                 § 1629.2   Definitions.                                 misapplication, or any other fraudulent               behalf of Pennsylvania Department of
                                                   Annualized funding level means the                    or dishonest act committed by an                      Community and Economic
                                                 amount of:                                              employee, officer, director, agent, or                Development.
                                                 (1) Basic Field Grant funds (including                  volunteer.
                                                      Agricultural Worker and Native                                                                           DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions
                                                      American) and                                      § 1629.6 What is the required minimum
                                                                                                         level of coverage?                                    must be filed on or before May 18, 2017.
                                                 (2) Special grants of LSC funds,                                                                              Replies to an opposition must be filed
                                                      including Technology Initiative                       (a) A recipient must carry fidelity
                                                                                                         bond coverage or similar coverage at a                on or before May 30, 2017.
                                                      Grants, Pro Bono Innovation Fund
                                                      grants, and emergency relief grants,               minimum level of at least ten percent of              ADDRESSES:Federal Communications
                                                      awarded by LSC to the recipient for                its annualized funding level for the                  Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
                                                      the fiscal year included in the                    previous fiscal year.                                 Washington, DC 20554.
                                                      recipient’s annual audited financial                  (b) If a recipient is a new recipient,
                                                                                                         the coverage must be at a minimum                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                      statements.                                                                                              Alexander Minard, Telecommunications
                                                                                                         level of at least ten percent of the initial
                                                 § 1629.3   Who must be bonded?                          grant.                                                Access Policy Division, Wireline
                                                    (a) A recipient must supply fidelity                    (c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)                 Competition Bureau, at (202) 418–7400
                                                 bond coverage for all employees,                        and (b) of this section, recipients must              or email: Alexander.Minard@fcc.gov.
                                                 officers, directors, agents, and                        not carry coverage under this part at a               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:     This is a
                                                 volunteers.                                             level less than $100,000.                             summary of the Commission’s
                                                    (b) If a recipient uses a third party for                                                                  document, Report No. 3075, released
                                                                                                         § 1629.7 Can LSC funds be used to cover
                                                 payroll, billing, or collection services,               bonding costs?                                        April 25, 2017. The full text of the
                                                 the recipient must either supply                                                                              Petitions is available for viewing and
                                                 coverage covering the third party or                      Costs of bonding required by this part
                                                                                                         are allowable if expended consistent                  copying at the FCC Reference
                                                 ensure that the third party has a fidelity                                                                    Information Center, 445 12th Street SW.,
                                                 bond or similar insurance coverage.                     with 45 CFR part 1630. Costs of bonding
                                                                                                         such as rates, deductibles, single loss               Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
                                                    (c) For recipients with subgrants:
                                                    (1) The recipient must extend its                    retention, and premiums, are allowable                They also may be accessed online via
                                                 fidelity bond coverage to supply                        as an indirect cost if such bonding is in             the Commission’s Electronic Comment
                                                 identical coverage to the subrecipient                  accordance with sound business                        Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/
                                                 and the subrecipient’s directors,                       practice and is reasonable.                           ecfs/. The Commission will not send a
                                                 officers, employees, agents, and                          Dated: April 27, 2017.                              copy of this document pursuant to the
                                                 volunteers to the extent required to                    Stefanie K. Davis,
                                                                                                                                                               Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
                                                 comply with this Part; or                                                                                     801(a)(1)(A), because this document
                                                                                                         Assistant General Counsel.
                                                    (2) The subrecipient must supply                                                                           does not have an impact on any rules of
                                                                                                         [FR Doc. 2017–08857 Filed 5–2–17; 8:45 am]
                                                 proof of its own fidelity bond coverage                                                                       particular applicability.
                                                                                                         BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
                                                 that meets the requirements of this Part                                                                        Subject: In the Matter of Connect
                                                 for the subrecipient’s directors, officers,                                                                   America Fund, ETC Annual Reports and
                                                 employees, agents, and volunteers.                                                                            Certifications, FCC 17–12, published at
                                                                                                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
                                                 § 1629.4 What forms of bonds can                        COMMISSION                                            82 FR 14466, March 21, 2017, in WC
                                                 recipients use?                                                                                               Docket Nos. 10–90, 14–58. This
                                                   (a) A recipient may use any form of                   47 CFR Part 54                                        document is being published pursuant
                                                 bond, such as individual, name                                                                                to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR
                                                                                                         [WC Docket Nos. 10–90, 14–58; Report No.
                                                 schedule, position schedule, blanket, or                3075]
                                                                                                                                                               1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
                                                 any combination of such forms of                                                                                Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
                                                 bonds, as long as the type or                           Petitions for Reconsideration of Action
                                                                                                                                                               Federal Communications Commission.
                                                 combination of bonds secured                            in Rulemaking Proceeding
                                                                                                                                                               Marlene H. Dortch,
                                                 adequately protects LSC funds.                          AGENCY:  Federal Communications
                                                   (b) A recipient may use similar forms                                                                       Secretary.
                                                                                                         Commission.
                                                 of insurance that essentially fulfill the                                                                     [FR Doc. 2017–08858 Filed 5–2–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                         ACTION: Petitions for reconsideration.
                                                 same purpose as a fidelity bond.                                                                              BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:34 May 02, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00005   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM   03MYP1



Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:36:31
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:36:31
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of proposed rulemaking.
DatesComments must be received by June 2, 2017.
ContactStefanie K. Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20007; (202) 295-1563 (phone), (202) 337-6519 (fax), or [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 20555 
CFR AssociatedFidelity Bond; Grant Programs-Law; Insurance; Legal Services and Surety Bonds

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR